Turnover intention among operating room nurses during the COVID-19 outbreak and its association with perceived safety climate

Middle East Nurses Turnover Intention and its Correlates Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review

Global nursing scarcity was more evident during COVID-19. This study investigated the rates and contributing factors of turnover intention in the middle east through meta-analysis. Medline EMCARE, Cochrane, CINAHL, EMBASE, Ovid, Psych Info, PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Web of Science databases searched, Protocol PROSPERO Registration Number was CRD42022337686. The turnover intention rate was 42.3% [CI: 40%, 44.6%]. Working environment, stress, deployment to COVID, fear of infection, long working hours, shift duties, and lack of social support were the major contributing factors.

Predictors of anxiety and depression in operating room nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A multi-center cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Operating room nurses (ORNs) who directly deal with the treatment and care of COVID-19 patients during the pandemic are at risk in terms of psychological stress and other mental health problems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the anxiety and depression levels of ORNs working in different countries in the COVID-19 outbreak, and to determine the predictors and the difference between countries.

METHODS

This was a descriptive and cross-sectional study. Data were collected online using a google form between February 2021-February 2022. The universe of the research is nurses who are members of national Perioperative Nurses Association (USA, Türkiye, Australia, England, India, Israel) and 1127 ORNs participated the study. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of anxiety and depression status were examined by binary logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The rate of anxiety is 5.46 times higher in nurses in the USA, 5.07 times higher among nurses in Australia, and 4.49 times higher for nurses in England. It was determined that the rate of depression in ORNs working in Türkiye was 5.97 times higher. It was found that the rate of depression is 1.59 times higher in ORNs living away from the family after care of COVID-19 patient.

CONCLUSION

Despite some differences between countries in terms of health system, patient potential, economic and the opportunities offered, generally high levels of anxiety and/or depression indicate that all ORNs need urgent support. Identifying risk factors will help recognize anxiety and depression in ORNs and take measures to protect their mental health during the pandemic.

Working through a pandemic: The mediating effect of nurses' health on the relationship between working conditions and turnover intent

AIM

While research has demonstrated that nurses' health and working conditions are important predictors of turnover in COVID-19, the relationship between these factors is not well understood. Our study investigated the mechanism through which working conditions and nurses' physical and mental health could impact intent to leave the nursing profession.

DESIGN

Secondary data from a cross-sectional survey of 3478 nurses in British Columbia administered in May 2021 were analysed using structural equation modelling.

METHODS

Two models were assessed utilizing workplace conditions as the predictor, nurses' health as the mediator, and reported turnover intent (Model 1), and anticipated time to turnover (Model 2) as the outcomes.

RESULTS

Nurses' health partially mediated the relationship between working conditions and turnover intent, where poorer workplace conditions were directly and indirectly associated with greater likelihood of leaving the profession. Nurses' health fully mediated the relationship between working conditions and nurses' anticipated time to turnover, after controlling for age. The findings from this study underscore the importance of enhancing working conditions and improving nurses' mental health and safety on the job.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

The British Columbia Nurses' Union provided the data for this study; survey data from 3478 nurses were utilized in our study.

Assessment of psychological and physical stressors among nurses in different functional areas before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic placed a great burden on all health-care resources, especially nurses. The prevalence and underlying risk factors of affective symptoms related to the COVID-19 pandemic have been studied primarily among nurses in intensive care units (ICU) and emergency departments. The aim of this study was to identify at-risk nursing areas by examining the psychological and physical stress values of nurses in different functional areas.

METHODS

A questionnaire with standardized items was developed to assess psychological and physical stress values. At least 50 nurses with a minimum work experience of 3 years were recruited from the ward, outpatient clinic (OC), intermediate care (IMC) unit, and operating room (OR) of the University Hospital RWTH Aachen. The participants answered the questionnaire by referring to their perceptions before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Absolute differences and relative trends in psychological and physical stress values were compared within and across functional areas.

RESULTS

The ward and OR nurses experienced significant increases in workload (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively) and time stressors (p < 0.001 and p = 0.043, respectively) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Regardless of functional area, the nurses showed strong tendencies toward increases in subclinical affective symptoms. After adjustments for age, sex, working in a shift system, the treatment of patients with COVID-19, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on personal life, the values for working with pleasure decreased significantly among the ward (p = 0.001) and OR nurses (p = 0.009) compared with the OC nurses. In addition, the ward (p < 0.001) and OR nurses (p = 0.024) were significantly more likely to express intent to leave their profession than OC nurses.

CONCLUSIONS

The IMC nurses showed good adaptation to the exacerbated situation caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The ward nurses, followed by the OR nurses, were the most vulnerable to mental and physical exhaustion, which threatened the nurses' resilience and retention in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, intervention programs must specifically address the professional and emotional needs of ward and OR nurses to prepare the health-care system for future crises.

A global overview of healthcare workers' turnover intention amid COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review with future directions

BACKGROUND

Globally, the health workforce has long suffered from labour shortages. This has been exacerbated by the workload increase caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Major collapses in healthcare systems across the world during the peak of the pandemic led to calls for strategies to alleviate the increasing job attrition problem within the healthcare sector. This turnover may worsen given the overwhelming pressures experienced by the health workforce during the pandemic, and proactive measures should be taken to retain healthcare workers. This review aims to examine the factors affecting turnover intention among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

A mixed studies systematic review was conducted. The PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO databases were searched from January 2020 to March 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Tools and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool version 2018 were applied by two independent researchers to critically appraise the methodological quality. Findings were synthesised using a convergent integrated approach and categorised thematically.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies, including 39 quantitative, two qualitative and two mixed methods studies were included in this review. Eighteen were conducted in the Middle East, ten in the Americas, nine in the Asia-Pacific region and six in Europe. Nurses (n = 35) were included in the majority of the studies, while physicians (n = 13), allied health workers (n = 11) and healthcare administrative or management staff (n = 7) were included in a smaller proportion. Five themes emerged from the data synthesis: (1) fear of COVID-19 exposure, (2) psychological responses to stress, (3) socio-demographic characteristics, (4) adverse working conditions, and (5) organisational support.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of factors influence healthcare workers' turnover intention in times of pandemic. Future research should be more focused on specific factors, such as working conditions or burnout, and specific vulnerable groups, including migrant healthcare workers and healthcare profession minorities, to aid policymakers in adopting strategies to support and incentivise them to retain them in their healthcare jobs.