Excellent cosmetic result of daylight photodynamic therapy for facial flat warts in a child

Anti-aging Effects of Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment: A Real-Life Experience

INTRODUCTION

Tirbanibulin 1% ointment has been licensed to treat non-hyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AKs) on the face and scalp in adults to ensure excellent patient tolerability due to the mild side effects and the brief application time compared to other topical therapies on the market. A growing body of evidence suggests that, beyond their primary function, the treatments for AKs and the cancerization field may inadvertently confer substantial cosmetic benefits to patients.

METHODS

We report a single-center retrospective case series of patients referred to the Dermatology Unit of the University Hospital of Messina, Italy, between February and December 2023 seeking treatment for AKs in the context of photodamaged areas in which the application of tirbanibulin 1% ointment induced, besides clearance of AKs, anti-aging effects on both skin texture and solar lentigos.

RESULTS

Seven patients affected by Olsen grade 1-2 AKs experienced a powerful rejuvenating effect in the treated areas, with a marked efficacy in skin lightening and clearance of solar lentigo.

CONCLUSIONS

Tirbanibulin 1% ointment seems able to improve skin aging as a desirable side effect at the site of application for AKs on chronic photodamaged skin. Such preliminary observation needs further confirmation in real-life studies on larger cohorts of patients, to explain the pathogenic mechanisms responsible for such aesthetically relevant results.

Photodynamic therapy for intergluteal warts in a child affected by Rett syndrome

Genital warts (GWs) are the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide, caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). The increasing prevalence of GWs in children has renewed the interest in therapeutic management which still presents a unique challenge, being influenced by many variables including size, quantity, and location of warts, as well as the presence of comorbidities. Conventional photodynamic therapy (C-PDT) has already shown encouraging results in the treatment of viral warts in adult patients, but its use is still not standardized in the pediatric population. On this topic, we report our experience with C-PDT in a difficult-to-treat area like the perianal region in a 12-year-old girl affected by Rett syndrome, an X-linked dominant neurological disorder, with a 10-month history of florid genital condylomatosis. After the third session of C-PDT, complete clearance of the lesions was achieved. Our case is paradigmatic of the potentiality of PDT to treat difficult lesions in difficult patients. Despite being expensive and time-consuming, this procedure has been demonstrated to be safe and well-tolerated. Lastly, the therapy is also well accepted by parents, due to its minimal invasiveness and the few side effects, compared to the other therapeutic options.

Photodynamic therapy in pediatric age: Current applications and future trends

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a photochemotherapy based on local application of a photosensitive compound and subsequent exposure to a light source of adequate wavelength. It is a non-invasive therapeutic procedure widely used in oncodermatology for treatment of numerous skin cancers, but in the last years its use has been gradually extended to an increasing list of skin diseases of both infectious and inflammatory nature. Although PDT is proven as a safe and effective therapeutic option in adults, its use is not well standardized in the pediatric population. In this review, we will focus on clinical applications, mechanisms of action, protocols, and adverse events in children and adolescents. Most of pediatric experiences concerned treatment of skin cancers in Gorlin syndrome and xeroderma pigmentosum, acne vulgaris, and viral warts, but other applications emerged, such as cutaneous lymphoma and pseudo-lymphomas, necrobiosis lipoidica, hidradenitis suppurativa, dissecting cellulitis, leishmaniasis, angiofibromas, verrucous epidermal nevus, and linear porokeratosis. In these pediatric diseases, PDT appeared as an effective therapeutic alternative. The results on vitiligo were limited and not fully encouraging. Although highly versatile, PDT is not a therapy for all skin diseases, and a deeper knowledge of its mechanisms of action is required to better define its spectrum of action and safety in pediatric patients.

Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Disease in Children—A Review of the Literature

Photodynamic therapy is a mode of treatment whereby local irradiation of an administered photosensitizer with light of a specific wavelength generates cytotoxic reactive oxygen species. Despite the upward trend in the popularity of this method in adults, it is not yet commonly used in the treatment of children. Due to certain limitations, underdeveloped treatment regimens and potential side effects, the use of photodynamic therapy in the pediatric population is still in the initial phases of evaluation in clinical trials. Method: This study is a review of articles in English from the databases PubMed and Web of Science retrieved by applying the search term “photodynamic therapy in children” from 2000–2020. Results: Based on the literature review, we analyze selected pediatric clinical cases in which photodynamic therapy was used for treatment in children. Examples of photodynamic therapy for treatment of dermatological diseases, diseases of the mucosa of the upper respiratory tract, halitosis, eye diseases and brain tumors are described. The paper describes the effectiveness of anti-cancer photodynamic therapy, including its use in antibacterial therapy. Conclusions: The results of the analysis suggest the potential of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of various diseases in children.

Management of Difficult-to-Treat Warts: Traditional and New Approaches

Warts are regularly treated by dermatologists, and while many respond readily to first-line treatments, others may represent a therapeutic challenge. Large, deep, numerous, and extensive warts; treatment-resistant lesions with higher risk for side effects, such as hypopigmentation; or patients unable to tolerate or comply with our treatment regimen, may need alternative treatment options. In this work we review the characteristics of select modalities that should be considered for difficult-to-treat warts. We discuss efficacy and tolerability data as well as practical features that can guide us to select the best treatment for every scenario. Novel approaches, still in an investigational phase, are also discussed to illustrate potential future directions of wart treatment.

Efficacy and safety of conventional versus daylight photodynamic therapy in children affected by multiple facial flat warts

BACKGROUND

facial flat warts (FFWs) are a superficial viral skin disease, extremely common in childhood. Recently, conventional photodynamic therapy (C-PDT) has been used for the treatment of FFWs with good outcome. The efficacy of daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) has not yet been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

to investigate and assess the efficacy and safety of C-PDT versus DL-PDT using 10% aminolevulinic acid (ALA) in the treatment of recalcitrant FFWs in a paediatric setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

30 consecutive patients aged <18 years with FFWs of the face were included and randomly divided into two groups: group A (15 patients) was treated with C-PDT and group B (15 patients) with DL-PDT. Patients underwent treatments for three times with 1-month intervals. The response was assessed on week 4,812 and 24 (T4,T8,T12,T24) and scored as excellent (75-100% reduction of total wart count), very good (74-50% reduction), good (49-25% reduction), poor (<25% reduction or no response). Any adverse event occurring during/after ALA application/irradiation as well as pain intensity were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

at T4 and T8 no excellent response was achieved in both groups. At week 12, excellent response was observed in 53.3% of group A patients vs 0% of group B patients, although in the latter 66.7% of patients achieved a very good response. Excellent outcome raised to 73.3% and 80% in group A and B, respectively, at week 24. Poor response to therapy was observed in 26.7% of patients in group A and 20% in group B. Both treatment modalities were well tolerated, with transient pain, irritation and hyperpigmentation as main side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

ALA-PDT is effective and safe for FFWs, with striking cosmetic results and no recurrence. Compared with conventional modality, DL-PDT is better tolerated, time-saving, nearly painless and greatly appreciated by young patients.