1
|
Carter H, Beard D, Leighton P, Moffatt F, Smith BE, Webster KE, Logan P. Development of an intervention for patients following an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an online nominal group technique consensus study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e082387. [PMID: 39025812 PMCID: PMC11261705 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To develop an intervention for to support patients diagnosed with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture with decision-making regarding treatment. (2) To define evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following an ACL rupture. DESIGN Nominal group technique consensus study. SETTING Online meetings with patients and key stakeholders working and receiving treatment in the National Health Service, UK. PARTICIPANTS Consensus meetings composed of eight voting participants and five non-voting facilitators. Voting participants included five clinicians, one outpatient therapy manager and two patients with experience in an ACL rupture and reconstructive surgery. Non-voting facilitators supported group discussions and/or observed study procedures. This included a clinical academic expert, two methodology experts and two patient representatives. METHOD Two online meetings were held. Pre-elicitation material was distributed ahead of the first meeting. Premeeting voting was conducted ahead of both meetings. A draft of the shared decision-making intervention and recommendations were shared ahead of the second meeting. Components were discussed and ranked for inclusion based on a 70% agreement threshold. RESULTS The meetings led to the development of a shared decision-making intervention to support treatment decision-making following an ACL rupture. The intervention includes two components: (1) a patient information leaflet and key questions diagram and (2) option grid. The evidence-based recommendations encompass core components of treatment reaching the 70% threshold agreed by the group. The recommendations cover: (1) advice and education, (2) exercise guidance, (3) intervention delivery, (4) outcome measure use and (5) shared decision-making. CONCLUSION This study has successfully developed a shared decision-making intervention to support ACL treatment decision-making, ready for testing in a future feasibility study. Evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of patients following ACL injury, ready for testing in a National Health Service (UK) setting, are also presented. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05529511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Carter
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Beard
- Surgical Intervention Trials Unit, Botnar Research Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Paul Leighton
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Fiona Moffatt
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Benjamin E Smith
- Physiotherapy Outpatients, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kate E Webster
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phillipa Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aref HAT, Turk T, Dhanani R, Xiao A, Olson J, Paul P, Dennett L, Yacyshyn E, Sadowski CA. Development and evaluation of shared decision-making tools in rheumatology: A scoping review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 66:152432. [PMID: 38554593 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared decision-making (SDM) tools are facilitators of decision-making through a collaborative process between patients/caregivers and clinicians. These tools help clinicians understand patient's perspectives and help patients in making informed decisions based on their preferences. Despite their usefulness for both patients and clinicians, SDM tools are not widely implemented in everyday practice. One barrier is the lack of clarity on the development and evaluation processes of these tools. Such processes have not been previously described in the field of rheumatology. OBJECTIVE To describe the development and evaluation processes of shared decision-making (SDM) tools used in rheumatology. METHODS Bibliographic databases (e.g., EMBASE and CINAHL) were searched for relevant articles. Guidelines for the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews were followed. Studies included were: addressing SDM among adults in rheumatology, focusing on development and/or evaluation of SDM tool, full texts, empirical research, and in the English language. RESULTS Of the 2030 records screened, forty-six reports addressing 36 SDM tools were included. Development basis and evaluation measures varied across the studies. The most commonly reported development basis was the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) criteria (19/36, 53 %). Other developmental foundations reported were: The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) (6/36, 16 %), Informed Medical Decision Foundation elements (3/36, 8 %), edutainment principles (2/36, 5.5 %), and others (e.g. DISCERN and MARKOV Model) (9/31,29 %). The most commonly used evaluation measures were the Decisional Conflict Scale (18/46, 39 %), acceptability and knowledge (7/46, 15 %), and the preparation for decision-making scale (5/46,11 %). CONCLUSION For better quality and wider implementation of such tools, there is a need for detailed, transparent, systematic, and consistent reporting of development methods and evaluation measures. Using established checklists for reporting development and evaluation is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba A T Aref
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tarek Turk
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ruhee Dhanani
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Andrew Xiao
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Joanne Olson
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Pauline Paul
- Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Liz Dennett
- Geoffrey and Robyn Sperber Health Sciences Library, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elaine Yacyshyn
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Cheryl A Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Neuman MD, Elwyn G, Graff V, Schmitz V, Politi MC. My anesthesia Choice-HF: development and preliminary testing of a tool to facilitate conversations about anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. BMC Anesthesiol 2024; 24:165. [PMID: 38693498 PMCID: PMC11061990 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02547-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients often desire involvement in anesthesia decisions, yet clinicians rarely explain anesthesia options or elicit preferences. We developed My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture, a conversation aid about anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery and tested its preliminary efficacy and acceptability. METHODS We developed a 1-page, tabular format, plain-language conversation aid with feedback from anesthesiologists, decision scientists, and community advisors. We conducted an online survey of English-speaking adults aged 50 and older. Participants imagined choosing between spinal and general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery. Before and after viewing the aid, participants answered a series of questions regarding key outcomes, including decisional conflict, knowledge about anesthesia options, and acceptability of the aid. RESULTS Of 364/409 valid respondents, mean age was 64 (SD 8.9) and 59% were female. The proportion indicating decisional conflict decreased after reviewing the aid (63-34%, P < 0.001). Median knowledge scores increased from 50% correct to 67% correct (P < 0.001). 83% agreed that the aid would help them discuss options and preferences. 76.4% would approve of doctors using it. CONCLUSION My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture decreased decisional conflict and increased knowledge about anesthesia choices for hip fracture surgery. Respondents assessed it as acceptable for use in clinical settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Use of clinical decision aids may increase shared decision-making; further testing is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark D Neuman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 308 Blockley Hall 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, USA.
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.
| | | | - Veena Graff
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, 308 Blockley Hall 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
- Center for Perioperative Outcomes Research and Transformation, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Viktoria Schmitz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| | - Mary C Politi
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naye F, Toupin-April K, de Wit M, LeBlanc A, Dubois O, Boonen A, Barton JL, Fraenkel L, Li LC, Stacey D, March L, Barber CEH, Hazlewood GS, Guillemin F, Bartlett SJ, Berthelsen DB, Mather K, Arnaud L, Akpabio A, Adebajo A, Schultz G, Sloan VS, Gill TK, Sharma S, Scholte-Voshaar M, Caso F, Nikiphorou E, Nasef SI, Campbell W, Meara A, Christensen R, Suarez-Almazor ME, Jull JE, Alten R, Morgan EM, El-Miedany Y, Singh JA, Burt J, Jayatilleke A, Hmamouchi I, Blanco FJ, Fernandez AP, Mackie S, Jones A, Strand V, Monti S, Stones SR, Lee RR, Nielsen SM, Evans V, Srinivasalu H, Gérard T, Demers JL, Bouchard R, Stefan T, Dugas M, Bergeron F, Beaton D, Maxwell LJ, Tugwell P, Décary S. OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 65:152344. [PMID: 38232625 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Shared decision making (SDM) is a central tenet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal care. The lack of standardization regarding SDM instruments and outcomes in clinical trials threatens the comparative effectiveness of interventions. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) SDM Working Group is developing a Core Outcome Set for trials of SDM interventions in rheumatology and musculoskeletal health. The working group reached consensus on a Core Outcome Domain Set in 2020. The next step is to develop a Core Outcome Measurement Set through the OMERACT Filter 2.2. METHODS We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) to identify candidate instruments for the OMERACT Filter 2.2 We systematically reviewed five databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). An information specialist designed search strategies to identify all measurement instruments used in SDM studies in adults or children living with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others. Paired reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text articles. We extracted characteristics of all candidate instruments (e.g., measured construct, measurement properties). We classified candidate instruments and summarized evidence gaps with an adapted version of the Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table. RESULTS We found 14,464 citations, read 239 full text articles, and included 99 eligible studies. We identified 220 potential candidate instruments. The five most used measurement instruments were the Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions) (n=38), the Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument (n=20), the Decision Regret Scale (n=9), the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (n=8), and the CollaboRATE (n=8). Only 44 candidate instruments (20%) had any measurement properties reported by the included studies. Of these instruments, only 57% matched with at least one of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table. CONCLUSION We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties. The next steps for the OMERACT SDM Working Group are to match candidate instruments with Core Domains, assess feasibility and review validation studies of measurement instruments in rheumatic diseases or other conditions. Development and validation of new instruments may be required for some Core Domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Annie LeBlanc
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada; VITAM Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Olivia Dubois
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- VA Portland Health Care System, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arthritis Research Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lyn March
- Department of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Department of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Susan J Bartlett
- Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, McGill University, Canada; Research Institute - McGill University Health Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Medicine Division of Rheumatology, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dorthe B Berthelsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen & Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, Odense & Department of Rehabilitation, Municipality of Guldborgsund, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Nykoebing, Denmark
| | | | - Laurent Arnaud
- Department of Rheumatology, CRMR RESO, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Adewale Adebajo
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Victor S Sloan
- Sheng Consulting LLC, Flemington, NJ, USA; The Peace Corps, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tiffany K Gill
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Saurab Sharma
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- Patient Research Partner, Department of Pharmacy and Department of Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen
| | - Francesco Caso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College Hospital, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samah Ismail Nasef
- Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Willemina Campbell
- Patient research partner, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alexa Meara
- Division of Rheumatology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Robin Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, & Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology Research Center, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology, Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, Schlosspark-Klinik, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esi M Morgan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Division of Rheumatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Burt
- Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. Clare's Mercy Hospital, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | | | - Ihsane Hmamouchi
- Health Sciences Research Centre (CReSS), Faculty of Medicine, International University of Rabat (UIR), Rabat, Morocco
| | - Francisco J Blanco
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Anthony P Fernandez
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sara Monti
- Department of Rheumatology, Policlinico S. Matteo, IRCCS Fondazione, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simon R Stones
- Patient research partner, Envision Pharma Group, Wilmslow, UK
| | - Rebecca R Lee
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, and University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Demark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vicki Evans
- Patient Research Partner and Discipline of Optometry, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Hemalatha Srinivasalu
- Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA; GW School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
| | - Thomas Gérard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | | | - Roxanne Bouchard
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Théo Stefan
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | - Lara J Maxwell
- Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stacey D, Lewis KB, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas EE, Pacheco-Brousseau L, Finderup J, Gunderson J, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Bravo P, Steffensen K, Gogovor A, Graham ID, Kelly SE, Légaré F, Sondergaard H, Thomson R, Trenaman L, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:CD001431. [PMID: 38284415 PMCID: PMC10823577 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient decision aids are interventions designed to support people making health decisions. At a minimum, patient decision aids make the decision explicit, provide evidence-based information about the options and associated benefits/harms, and help clarify personal values for features of options. This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in 2003 and last updated in 2017. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of patient decision aids in adults considering treatment or screening decisions using an integrated knowledge translation approach. SEARCH METHODS We conducted the updated search for the period of 2015 (last search date) to March 2022 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EBSCO, and grey literature. The cumulative search covers database origins to March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included published randomized controlled trials comparing patient decision aids to usual care. Usual care was defined as general information, risk assessment, clinical practice guideline summaries for health consumers, placebo intervention (e.g. information on another topic), or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations for inclusion, extracted intervention and outcome data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Primary outcomes, based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), were attributes related to the choice made (informed values-based choice congruence) and the decision-making process, such as knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision-making, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were choice, confidence in decision-making, adherence to the chosen option, preference-linked health outcomes, and impact on the healthcare system (e.g. consultation length). We pooled results using mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), applying a random-effects model. We conducted a subgroup analysis of 105 studies that were included in the previous review version compared to those published since that update (n = 104 studies). We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS This update added 104 new studies for a total of 209 studies involving 107,698 participants. The patient decision aids focused on 71 different decisions. The most common decisions were about cardiovascular treatments (n = 22 studies), cancer screening (n = 17 studies colorectal, 15 prostate, 12 breast), cancer treatments (e.g. 15 breast, 11 prostate), mental health treatments (n = 10 studies), and joint replacement surgery (n = 9 studies). When assessing risk of bias in the included studies, we rated two items as mostly unclear (selective reporting: 100 studies; blinding of participants/personnel: 161 studies), due to inadequate reporting. Of the 209 included studies, 34 had at least one item rated as high risk of bias. There was moderate-certainty evidence that patient decision aids probably increase the congruence between informed values and care choices compared to usual care (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.13; 21 studies, 9377 participants). Regarding attributes related to the decision-making process and compared to usual care, there was high-certainty evidence that patient decision aids result in improved participants' knowledge (MD 11.90/100, 95% CI 10.60 to 13.19; 107 studies, 25,492 participants), accuracy of risk perceptions (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.34; 25 studies, 7796 participants), and decreased decisional conflict related to feeling uninformed (MD -10.02, 95% CI -12.31 to -7.74; 58 studies, 12,104 participants), indecision about personal values (MD -7.86, 95% CI -9.69 to -6.02; 55 studies, 11,880 participants), and proportion of people who were passive in decision-making (clinician-controlled) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88; 21 studies, 4348 participants). For adverse outcomes, there was high-certainty evidence that there was no difference in decision regret between the patient decision aid and usual care groups (MD -1.23, 95% CI -3.05 to 0.59; 22 studies, 3707 participants). Of note, there was no difference in the length of consultation when patient decision aids were used in preparation for the consultation (MD -2.97 minutes, 95% CI -7.84 to 1.90; 5 studies, 420 participants). When patient decision aids were used during the consultation with the clinician, the length of consultation was 1.5 minutes longer (MD 1.50 minutes, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.20; 8 studies, 2702 participants). We found the same direction of effect when we compared results for patient decision aid studies reported in the previous update compared to studies conducted since 2015. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to usual care, across a wide variety of decisions, patient decision aids probably helped more adults reach informed values-congruent choices. They led to large increases in knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, and an active role in decision-making. Our updated review also found that patient decision aids increased patients' feeling informed and clear about their personal values. There was no difference in decision regret between people using decision aids versus those receiving usual care. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of patient decision aids on adherence and downstream effects on cost and resource use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | - Meg Carley
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Robert Volk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elisa E Douglas
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Michael J Barry
- Informed Medical Decisions Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carol L Bennett
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Paulina Bravo
- Education and Cancer Prevention, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Karina Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, IRS - Lillebælt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Shannon E Kelly
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Richard Thomson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Logan Trenaman
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
te Molder MEM, Vriezekolk JE, van Onsem S, Smolders JMH, Heesterbeek PJC, van den Ende CHM. Exploration of adverse consequences of total knee arthroplasty by patients and knee specialists: a qualitative study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 8:rkad111. [PMID: 38152392 PMCID: PMC10751231 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives A successful outcome according to the knee specialist is not a guarantee for treatment success as perceived by patients. In this study, we aimed to explore outcome expectations and experiences of patients with OA before and after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery and knee specialists that might contribute to the negative appraisal of its effect, and differences in views between patients and knee specialists. Methods Semi-structured interviews were held in Belgium and the Netherlands. Twenty-five patients (2 without indications for TKA, 11 on the waiting list for TKA and 12 postoperative TKA) and 15 knee specialists (9 orthopaedic surgeons, 1 physician assistant, 1 nurse practitioner and 4 physiotherapists) were interviewed. Conversations were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using thematic analysis following the grounded theory approach. Separate analyses were conducted for patients and knee specialists. Results Patients were focused on the arduous process of getting used to the prosthesis, lingering pain, awareness of the artificial knee and limitations they experience during valued and daily activities, whereas knee specialists put emphasis on surgical failure, unexplained pain, limited walking ability and impairments that limit the physical functioning of patients. Conclusion This study provides a comprehensive overview of potential adverse consequences from the perspective of both patients and knee specialists. Improving patients' awareness and expectations of adaptation to the knee prosthesis needs to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malou E M te Molder
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Stefaan van Onsem
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, AZ Alma, Eeklo, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - José M H Smolders
- Department of Orthopedics, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelia H M van den Ende
- Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Politi MC, Forcino RC, Parrish K, Durand M, O'Malley AJ, Moses R, Cooksey K, Elwyn G. The impact of adding cost information to a conversation aid to support shared decision making about low-risk prostate cancer treatment: Results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Health Expect 2023; 26:2023-2039. [PMID: 37394739 PMCID: PMC10485319 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision aids help patients consider the benefits and drawbacks of care options but rarely include cost information. We assessed the impact of a conversation-based decision aid containing information about low-risk prostate cancer management options and their relative costs. METHODS We conducted a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial in outpatient urology practices within a US-based academic medical center. We randomised five clinicians to four intervention sequences and enroled patients newly diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Primary patient-reported outcomes collected postvisit included the frequency of cost conversations and referrals to address costs. Other patient-reported outcomes included: decisional conflict postvisit and at 3 months, decision regret at 3 months, shared decision-making postvisit, financial toxicity postvisit and at 3 months. Clinicians reported their attitudes about shared decision-making pre- and poststudy, and the intervention's feasibility and acceptability. We used hierarchical regression analysis to assess patient outcomes. The clinician was included as a random effect; fixed effects included education, employment, telehealth versus in-person visit, visit date, and enrolment period. RESULTS Between April 2020 and March 2022, we screened 513 patients, contacted 217 eligible patients, and enroled 117/217 (54%) (51 in usual care, 66 in the intervention group). In adjusted analyses, the intervention was not associated with cost conversations (β = .82, p = .27), referrals to cost-related resources (β = -0.36, p = .81), shared decision-making (β = -0.79, p = .32), decisional conflict postvisit (β = -0.34, p= .70), or at follow-up (β = -2.19, p = .16), decision regret at follow-up (β = -9.76, p = .11), or financial toxicity postvisit (β = -1.32, p = .63) or at follow-up (β = -2.41, p = .23). Most clinicians and patients had positive attitudes about the intervention and shared decision-making. In exploratory unadjusted analyses, patients in the intervention group experienced more transient indecision (p < .02) suggesting increased deliberation between visit and follow-up. DISCUSSION Despite enthusiasm from clinicians, the intervention was not significantly associated with hypothesised outcomes, though we were unable to robustly test outcomes due to recruitment challenges. Recruitment at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic impacted eligibility, sample size/power, study procedures, and increased telehealth visits and financial worry, independent of the intervention. Future work should explore ways to support shared decision-making, cost conversations, and choice deliberation with a larger sample. Such work could involve additional members of the care team, and consider the detail, quality, and timing of addressing these issues. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients and clinicians were engaged as stakeholder advisors meeting monthly throughout the duration of the project to advise on the study design, measures selected, data interpretation, and dissemination of study findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C. Politi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Rachel C. Forcino
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Katelyn Parrish
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Marie‐Anne Durand
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
- Université Toulouse III Paul SabatierToulouseFrance
| | - A. James O'Malley
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
- Department of Biomedical Data ScienceGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Rachel Moses
- Section of Urology, Department of SurgeryDartmouth‐Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| | - Krista Cooksey
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health SciencesWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical PracticeDartmouth CollegeLebanonNew HampshireUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schubbe D, Yen RW, Leavitt H, Forcino RC, Jacobs C, Friedman EB, McEvoy M, Rosenkranz KM, Rojas KE, Bradley A, Crayton E, Jackson S, Mitchell M, O'Malley AJ, Politi M, Tosteson ANA, Wong SL, Margenthaler J, Durand MA, Elwyn G. Implementing shared decision making for early-stage breast cancer treatment using a coproduction learning collaborative: the SHAIR Collaborative protocol. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:79. [PMID: 37452387 PMCID: PMC10349513 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00453-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) in breast cancer care improves outcomes, but it is not routinely implemented. Results from the What Matters Most trial demonstrated that early-stage breast cancer surgery conversation aids, when used by surgeons after brief training, improved SDM and patient-reported outcomes. Trial surgeons and patients both encouraged using the conversation aids in routine care. We will develop and evaluate an online learning collaborative, called the SHared decision making Adoption Implementation Resource (SHAIR) Collaborative, to promote early-stage breast cancer surgery SDM by implementing the conversation aids into routine preoperative care. Learning collaboratives are known to be effective for quality improvement in clinical care, but no breast cancer learning collaborative currently exists. Our specific aims are to (1) provide the SHAIR Collaborative resources to clinical sites to use with eligible patients, (2) examine the relationship between the use of the SHAIR Collaborative resources and patient reach, and (3) promote the emergence of a sustained learning collaborative in this clinical field, building on a partnership with the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBrS). METHODS We will conduct a two-phased implementation project: phase 1 pilot at five sites and phase 2 scale up at up to an additional 32 clinical sites across North America. The SHAIR Collaborative online platform will offer free access to conversation aids, training videos, electronic health record and patient portal integration guidance, a feedback dashboard, webinars, support center, and forum. We will use RE-AIM for data collection and evaluation. Our primary outcome is patient reach. Secondary data will include (1) patient-reported data from an optional, anonymous online survey, (2) number of active sites and interviews with site champions, (3) Normalization MeAsure Development questionnaire data from phase 1 sites, adaptations data utilizing the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Extended/-Implementation Strategies, and tracking implementation facilitating factors, and (4) progress on sustainability strategy and plans with ASBrS. DISCUSSION The SHAIR Collaborative will reach early-stage breast cancer patients across North America, evaluate patient-reported outcomes, engage up to 37 active sites, and potentially inform engagement factors affecting implementation success and may be sustained by ASBrS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Schubbe
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Renata W Yen
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Hannah Leavitt
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Rachel C Forcino
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Christopher Jacobs
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Erica B Friedman
- Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Health, Bellevue Hospital, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Maureen McEvoy
- Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| | - Kari M Rosenkranz
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Kristin E Rojas
- Dewitt-Daughtry Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ann Bradley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | | | | | - Myrtle Mitchell
- Breast Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care, Bronx, NY, 10467, USA
| | - A James O'Malley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Mary Politi
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Sandra L Wong
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
- Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Julie Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
- Centre Universitaire de Médecine Générale Et Santé Publique, Unisanté, Rue du Bugnon 44, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland
- UMR 1295, CERPOP, Université de Toulouse, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Turnbull S, Walsh NE, Moore AJ. Adaptation and Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool From One Health Context to Another: Partnership Approach Using Mixed Methods. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42551. [PMID: 37405845 DOI: 10.2196/42551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of pain and disability. Knee osteoarthritis accounts for nearly four-fifths of the burden of osteoarthritis internationally, and 10% of adults in the United Kingdom have the condition. Shared decision-making (SDM) supports patients to make more informed choices about treatment and care while reducing inequities in access to treatment. We evaluated the experience of a team adapting an SDM tool for knee osteoarthritis and the tool's implementation potential within a local clinical commissioning group (CCG) area in southwest England. The tool aims to prepare patients and clinicians for SDM by providing evidence-based information about treatment options relevant to disease stage. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the experiences of a team adapting an SDM tool from one health context to another and the implementation potential of the tool in the local CCG area. METHODS A partnership approach using mixed methods was used to respond to recruitment challenges and ensure that study aims could be addressed within time restrictions. A web-based survey was used to obtain clinicians' feedback on experiences of using the SDM tool. Qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone or video call with a sample of stakeholders involved in adapting and implementing the tool in the local CCG area. Survey findings were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was conducted on qualitative data using framework analysis, and data were mapped directly to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS Overall, 23 clinicians completed the survey, including first-contact physiotherapists (11/23, 48%), physiotherapists (7/23, 30%), specialist physiotherapists (4/23, 17%), and a general practitioner (1/23, 4%). Eight stakeholders involved in commissioning, adapting, and implementing the SDM tool were interviewed. Participants described barriers and facilitators to the adaptation, implementation, and use of the tool. Barriers included a lack of organizational culture that supported and resourced SDM, lack of clinician buy-in and awareness of the tool, challenges with accessibility and usability, and lack of adaptation for underserved communities. Facilitators included the influence of clinical leaders' belief that SDM tools can improve patient outcomes and National Health Service resource use, clinicians' positive experiences of using the tool, and improving awareness of the tool. Themes were mapped to 13 of the 14 TDF domains. Usability issues were described, which did not map to the TDF domains. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights barriers and facilitators to adapting and implementing tools from one health context to another. We recommend that tools selected for adaptation should have a strong evidence base, including evidence of effectiveness and acceptability in the original context. Legal advice should be sought regarding intellectual property early in the project. Existing guidance for developing and adapting interventions should be used. Co-design methods should be applied to improve adapted tools' accessibility and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Turnbull
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola E Walsh
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Moore
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shaw SE, Hughes G, Pearse R, Avagliano E, Day JR, Edsell ME, Edwards JA, Everest L, Stephens TJ. Opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery with high-risk patients: a multi-method qualitative study. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131:56-66. [PMID: 37117099 PMCID: PMC10308437 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the opportunities for shared decision-making when older high-risk patients are offered major surgery. This study examines how, when, and why clinicians and patients can share decision-making about major surgery. METHODS This was a multi-method qualitative study, combining video recordings of preoperative consultations, interviews, and focus groups (33 patients, 19 relatives, 36 clinicians), with observations and documentary analysis in clinics in five hospitals in the UK undertaking major orthopaedic, colorectal, and/or cardiac surgery. RESULTS Three opportunities for shared decision-making about major surgery were identified. Resolution-focused consultations (cardiac/colorectal) resulted in a single agreed preferred option related to a potentially life-threatening problem, with limited opportunities for shared decision-making. Evaluative and deliberative consultations offered more opportunity. The former focused on assessing the likelihood of benefits of surgery for a presenting problem that was not a threat to life for the patient (e.g., orthopaedic consultations) and the latter (largely colorectal) involved discussion of a range of options while also considering significant comorbidities and patient preferences. The extent to which opportunities for shared decision-making were available, and taken up by surgeons, was influenced by the nature of the presenting problem, clinical pathway, and patient trajectory. CONCLUSIONS Decisions about major surgery were not always shared between patients and doctors. The nature of the presenting problem, comorbidities, clinical pathways, and patient trajectories all informed the type of consultation and opportunities for sharing decision-making. Our findings have implications for clinicians, with shared decision-making about major surgery most feasible when the focus is on life-enhancing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara E Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rupert Pearse
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Ester Avagliano
- Hammersmith Hospital Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust London, London, UK
| | - James R Day
- Department of Anaesthesia, Oxford University Hospitals Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark E Edsell
- Department of Anaesthesia, The Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, UK
| | | | | | - Timothy J Stephens
- Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Veenendaal HV, Chernova G, Bouman CM, Etten-Jamaludin FSV, Dieren SV, Ubbink DT. Shared decision-making and the duration of medical consultations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 107:107561. [PMID: 36434862 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE 1) determine whether increased levels of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) affect consultation duration, 2) investigate the intervention characteristics involved. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane library were systematically searched for experimental and cross-sectional studies up to December 2021. A best-evidence synthesis was performed, and interventions characteristics that increased at least one SDM-outcome, were pooled and descriptively analyzed. RESULTS Sixty-three studies were selected: 28 randomized clinical trials, 8 quasi-experimental studies, and 27 cross-sectional studies. Overall, pooling of data was not possible due to substantial heterogeneity. No differences in consultation duration were found more often than increased or decreased durations. . Consultation times (minutes:seconds) were significantly increased only among interventions that: 1) targeted clinicians only (Mean Difference [MD] 1:30, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0:24-2:37); 2) were performed in primary care (MD 2:05, 95%CI 0:11-3:59; 3) used a group format (MD 2:25, 95%CI 0:45-4:05); 4) were not theory-based (MD 4:01, 95%CI 0:38-7:23). CONCLUSION Applying SDM does not necessarily require longer consultation durations. Theory-based, multilevel implementation approaches possibly lower the risk of increasing consultation durations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The commonly heard concern that time hinders SDM implementation can be contradicted, but implementation demands multifaceted approaches and space for training and adapting work processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haske van Veenendaal
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Genya Chernova
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Carlijn Mb Bouman
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Medical Library AMC, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Susan van Dieren
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawford BJ, Bennell KL, Hall M, Egerton T, McManus F, Lamb KE, Hinman RS. Effect of Information Content and General Practitioner Recommendation to Exercise on Treatment Beliefs and Intentions for Knee Osteoarthritis: An Online Multi-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial. ACR Open Rheumatol 2022; 5:17-27. [PMID: 36444919 PMCID: PMC9837392 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Revised: 09/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate effects of general osteoarthritis (OA) information in addition to a treatment option grid and general practitioner (GP) recommendation to exercise on treatment beliefs and intentions. METHODS An online randomized trial of 735 people 45 years old or older without OA who were recruited from a consumer survey network. Participants read a hypothetical scenario about visiting their GP for knee problems and were randomized to the following: i) 'general information', ii) 'option grid' (general information plus option grid), or iii) 'option grid plus recommendation' (general information plus option grid plus GP exercise recommendation). The primary outcome was an agreement that exercise is the best management option (0-10 numeric rating scale; higher scores indicating higher agreement that exercise is best). The secondary outcomes were beliefs about other management options and management intentions. Linear regression models estimated the mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) between-group difference in postintervention scores, adjusted for baseline. RESULTS Option grid plus recommendation led to higher agreement that exercise is the best management by a mean of 0.4 units (95% CI: 0.1-0.6) compared with general information. There were no other between-group differences for the primary outcome. Option grid led to higher agreement that surgery was best, and x-rays were necessary, compared with general information (mean between-group differences: 0.7 [CI: 0.2-1.1] and 0.5 [CI: 0.1-1.0], respectively) and option grid plus recommendation (0.5 [CI: 0.1-0.9] and 0.9 [CI: 0.4-1.3]). CONCLUSION Addition of an option grid and GP exercise recommendation to general OA information led to more favorable views that exercise was best for the hypothetical knee problem. However, differences were small and of unclear clinical importance.
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen C, Naunton M, Thomas J, Todd L, Bushell M. Novel pictograms to improve pharmacist understanding of the number needed to treat (NNT). CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING & LEARNING 2022; 14:1229-1245. [PMID: 36283794 DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Number needed to treat (NNT) is a clinically useful "yardstick" used to gauge the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The objective of this project was to develop and pilot a series of pictograms and assess their impact on pharmacist understanding of the NNT. METHODS Three decision aids containing NNT pictograms were developed following a preliminary literature review and three focus groups with current Australian-registered pharmacists and pharmacist interns. Pharmacists then tested the pictograms in a research pilot in clinical encounters until (1) ≥ 3 sessions had occurred or (2) a two-week period had elapsed from commencement. Knowledge assessment was administered both pre- and post-pilot. Transcription and inductive thematic analysis were applied to focus group data. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed rank, and McNemar's tests were used to analyse the pilot data. RESULTS Six core themes regarding NNT decision aid development were identified with >80% consensus across three focus groups (N = 11). Comparison of the pre-post measures (n = 10) showed an increase in median scores after use of NNT decision aids, correlating to a moderate Cohen classified effect size (d = 0.54). Wilcoxon matched pairs test demonstrated a statistically insignificant influence of NNT pictograms on the knowledge assessment survey (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS While the NNT is not a new concept, its incorporation as part of pictograms for health practitioner enrichment is novel. This pilot study suggests that utilizing decision aids with NNT pictograms as counselling adjuncts appears promising in the realm of enhancing pharmacists' understanding of the NNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Nguyen
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
| | - Mark Naunton
- Head of School - Health Sciences, University of Canberra, Faculty of Health, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
| | - Jackson Thomas
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
| | - Lyn Todd
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
| | - Mary Bushell
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Apathy NC, Sanner L, Adams MCB, Mamlin BW, Grout RW, Fortin S, Hillstrom J, Saha A, Teal E, Vest JR, Menachemi N, Hurley RW, Harle CA, Mazurenko O. Assessing the use of a clinical decision support tool for pain management in primary care. JAMIA Open 2022; 5:ooac074. [PMID: 36128342 PMCID: PMC9476612 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Given time constraints, poorly organized information, and complex patients, primary care providers (PCPs) can benefit from clinical decision support (CDS) tools that aggregate and synthesize problem-specific patient information. First, this article describes the design and functionality of a CDS tool for chronic noncancer pain in primary care. Second, we report on the retrospective analysis of real-world usage of the tool in the context of a pragmatic trial. Materials and methods The tool known as OneSheet was developed using user-centered principles and built in the Epic electronic health record (EHR) of 2 health systems. For each relevant patient, OneSheet presents pertinent information in a single EHR view to assist PCPs in completing guideline-recommended opioid risk mitigation tasks, review previous and current patient treatments, view patient-reported pain, physical function, and pain-related goals. Results Overall, 69 PCPs accessed OneSheet 2411 times (since November 2020). PCP use of OneSheet varied significantly by provider and was highly skewed (site 1: median accesses per provider: 17 [interquartile range (IQR) 9-32]; site 2: median: 8 [IQR 5-16]). Seven "power users" accounted for 70% of the overall access instances across both sites. OneSheet has been accessed an average of 20 times weekly between the 2 sites. Discussion Modest OneSheet use was observed relative to the number of eligible patients seen with chronic pain. Conclusions Organizations implementing CDS tools are likely to see considerable provider-level variation in usage, suggesting that CDS tools may vary in their utility across PCPs, even for the same condition, because of differences in provider and care team workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nate C Apathy
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lindsey Sanner
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Meredith C B Adams
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Burke W Mamlin
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Internal Medicine, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Randall W Grout
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Informatics, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Saura Fortin
- Primary Care, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jennifer Hillstrom
- IS Ambulatory & Research Solutions, Eskenazi Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Amit Saha
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evgenia Teal
- Data Core, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Joshua R Vest
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Nir Menachemi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Robert W Hurley
- Anesthesiology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christopher A Harle
- Clem McDonald Center for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Olena Mazurenko
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moreton SG, Salkeld G, Wortley S, Jeon YH, Urban H, Hunter DJ. The development and utility of a multicriteria patient decision aid for people contemplating treatment for osteoarthritis. Health Expect 2022; 25:2775-2785. [PMID: 36039824 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are a range of treatment options for osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee and hip, each with a unique profile of risks and benefits. Patient decision aids can help incorporate patient preferences in treatment decision-making. The aim of this study was to develop and test the utility of a patient decision aid for OA that was developed using a multicriteria decision analytic framework. METHODS People contemplating treatment for OA who had accessed the website myjointpain.org.au were invited to participate in the study by using the online patient decision aid. Two forms of the patient decision aid were created: A shorter form and a longer form, which allowed greater customization that was offered to respondents after they had completed the shorter form. Respondents also completed questions asking about their experience using the patient decision aid. RESULTS A total of 625 self-selected respondents completed the short-form and 180 completed the long-form. Across both forms, serious side effects, pain and function were rated as the most important treatment outcomes. Most respondents (64%) who completed the longer form reported that using the tool was a positive experience, 38% reported that using the tool had changed their mind and 48% said that using the tool would improve the quality of their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the findings suggest that this patient decision aid may be of use to a substantial number of people in facilitating appropriate treatment decision-making. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Service users of myjointpain.org.au were involved through their participation in the study, and their feedback will guide the development of future iterations of the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam G Moreton
- School of Psychology, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Glenn Salkeld
- Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sally Wortley
- Consumer Evidence and Engagement Unit, Australian Department of Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yun-Hee Jeon
- Sydney Nursing School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hema Urban
- Rheumatology Department, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, The Kolling Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fang JT, Chen SY, Tian YC, Lee CH, Wu IW, Kao CY, Lin CC, Tang WR. Effectiveness of end-stage renal disease communication skills training for healthcare personnel: a single-center, single-blind, randomized study. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2022; 22:397. [PMID: 35606757 PMCID: PMC9125352 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03458-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given that the consequences of treatment decisions for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are long-term and significant, good communication skills are indispensable for health care personnel (HCP) working in nephrology. However, HCP have busy schedules that make participation in face-to-face courses difficult. Thus, online curricula are a rising trend in medical education. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of online ESRD communication skills training (CST) concerning the truth-telling confidence and shared decision-making (SDM) ability of HCP. METHODS For this single-center, single-blind study, 91 participants (nephrologists and nephrology nurses) were randomly assigned to two groups, the intervention group (IG) (n = 45) or the control group (CG) (n = 46), with the IG participating in ESRD CST and the CG receiving regular in-service training. Truth-telling confidence and SDM ability were measured before (T0), 2 weeks after (T1), and 4 weeks after (T2) the intervention. Group differences over the study period were analyzed by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS IG participants exhibited significantly higher truth-telling confidence at T1 than did CG participants (t = 2.833, P = .006, Cohen's d = 0.59), while there were no significant intergroup differences in the confidence levels of participants in the two groups at T0 and T2. Concerning SDM ability, there were no significant intergroup differences at any of the three time points. However, IG participants had high levels of satisfaction (n = 43, 95%) and were willing to recommend ESRD CST to others (n = 41, 91.1%). CONCLUSIONS ESRD CST enhanced short-term truth-telling confidence, though it is unclear whether this was due to CST content or the online delivery. However, during pandemics, when face-to-face training is unsuitable, online CST is an indispensable tool. Future CST intervention studies should carefully design interactive modules and control for method of instruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Tseng Fang
- Kidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Ying Chen
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Gueishan Dist, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Chung Tian
- Kidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hung Lee
- Department of Nephrology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - I-Wen Wu
- Department of Nephrology, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yi Kao
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taoyuan Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Chih Lin
- Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Woung-Ru Tang
- Kidney Research Center, Department of Nephrology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Gueishan Dist, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Peters L, Stubenrouch F, Thijs J, Klemm P, Balm R, Ubbink D. Predictors of the Level of Shared Decision-Making in Vascular Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 64:65-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
18
|
Stubenrouch FE, Peters LJ, de Mik SML, Klemm PL, Peppelenbosch AG, Schreurs SCWM, Scharn DM, Legemate DA, Balm R, Ubbink DT. Improving shared decision-making in vascular surgery: a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2022; 64:73-81. [PMID: 35483576 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For various vascular surgical disorders different treatment options are available and feasible. Hence, vascular surgery seems an area par excellence for shared decision-making (SDM), in which clinicians incorporate patients' preferences into the final treatment decision. However, current SDM-levels in vascular surgical outpatient clinics is below expectations. To improve this, different decision support tools (DSTs) were developed: online patient decision aids, consultation cards and decision cards. METHODS This stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial was conducted in 13 Dutch hospitals. Besides the developed DSTs, a training on how to apply SDM during the clinician-patient encounter was used in this study. Data were obtained via questionnaires and audio-recordings. Primary outcome was the OPTION-5 score, an objective tool to assess the level of SDM, expressed as a percentage of exemplary performance. Main secondary outcomes were: patients' disease-specific knowledge, consultation duration, and treatment choice. Factors influencing OPTION-5 scores were studied using linear regression analysis. RESULTS We included 342 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA); n=87, intermittent claudication (IC); n=143, or varicose veins (VV); n=112. Audiotapes of 395 consultations were analysed. Overall mean OPTION-5 score significantly improved from 28.7% to 37.8% (mean difference 9.1%, 95%CI: 6.5-11.8%) after implementation of the DSTs. Also patient knowledge increased significantly (median increase: 13%, effect size: 0.13, p=.025). The number of patients choosing non-surgical treatment choices increased with 21.4% to 28.8% for AAA-patients and doubled (16.0% to 32.0%) among IC-patients. For surgeons, the SDM-training and for patients the decision aid significantly and independently increased OPTION-5 scores (p<.001 and p=.047, respectively). CONCLUSION Introducing DSTs improves the level of shared decision-making in vascular surgery, improves patient knowledge, and shifts their preference towards more non-surgical treatments. The SDM-training for clinicians and the decision aid for patients appeared the most effective means for improving SDM. TRIAL REGISTRATION NTR6487.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabienne E Stubenrouch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Loes J Peters
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Peter L Klemm
- Department of Surgery, Gelre Hospital, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud G Peppelenbosch
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Operative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stella C W M Schreurs
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Dick M Scharn
- Department of Surgery, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Dink A Legemate
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ron Balm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shared Decision Making Conceptual Models for Physiotherapy: A Theory Analysis. Physiotherapy 2022; 115:111-118. [DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
20
|
Rake EA, Dreesens D, Venhorst K, Meinders MJ, Geltink T, Wolswinkel JT, Dannenberg M, Kremer JAM, Elwyn G, Aarts JWM. Potential impact of encounter patient decision aids on the patient-clinician dialogue: a qualitative study on Dutch and American medical specialists' experiences. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e048146. [PMID: 35105563 PMCID: PMC8808398 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the experiences among Dutch and American clinicians on the impact of using encounter patient decision aids (ePDAs) on their clinical practice, and subsequently to formulate recommendations for sustained ePDA use in clinical practice. DESIGN Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinicians who used 11 different ePDAs (applicable to their specialty) for 3 months after a short training. The verbatim transcribed interviews were coded with thematic analysis by six researchers via ATLAS.ti. SETTING Nine hospitals in the Netherlands and two hospitals in the USA. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed: 16 Dutch medical specialists from four different disciplines (gynaecologists, ear-nose-throat specialists, neurologists and orthopaedic surgeon), 5 American gynaecologists and 4 American gynaecology medical trainees. RESULTS The interviews showed that the ePDA potentially impacted the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways. We identified six themes that illustrate this: that is, (1) communication style, for example, structuring the conversation; (2) the patient's role, for example, encouraging patients to ask more questions; (3) the clinician's role, for example, prompting clinicians to discuss more information; (4) workflow, for example, familiarity with the ePDA's content helped to integrate it into practice; (5) shared decision-making (SDM), for example, mixed experiences whether the ePDA contributed to SDM; and (6) content of the ePDA. Recommendations to possibly improve ePDA use based on the clinician's experiences: (1) add pictorial health information to the ePDA instead of text only and (2) instruct clinicians how to use the ePDA in a flexible (depending on their discipline and setting) and personalised way adapting the ePDA to the patients' needs (e.g., mark off irrelevant options). CONCLUSIONS ePDAs contributed to the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways according to medical specialists. A flexible and personalised approach appeared appropriate to integrate the use of ePDAs into the clinician's workflow, and customise their use to individual patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester A Rake
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Dunja Dreesens
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kristie Venhorst
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J Meinders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Geltink
- Knowledge Institute of the Dutch Association of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny T Wolswinkel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Dannenberg
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jan A M Kremer
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of IQ healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aarts JWM, Thompson R, Alam SS, Dannenberg M, Elwyn G, Foster TC. Encounter decision aids to facilitate shared decision-making with women experiencing heavy menstrual bleeding or symptomatic uterine fibroids: A before-after study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2259-2265. [PMID: 33632633 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Is the level of shared decision-making (SDM) higher after introduction of a SDM package (including encounter decision aids on treatment options for heavy menstrual bleeding and training for clinicians) than before?. METHODS This before-after study, performed in OB-GYN practice, compared consultations before and after introduction of a SDM package. The target sample size was 25 patients per group. Women seeking treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding were eligible. After their appointments, patients filled out a three-item patient-reported SDM measure. Treatment discussions were audio-recorded and rated for SDM using Observer OPTION5. Consultation transcripts in the 'after' group were checked for adherence to the steps required for intended use of decision aids. RESULTS 16 gynaecologists participated. 25 patients participated before introduction of the decision aids and 28 after. The proportion of women reporting optimal SDM was higher after introduction (75 %) than before (50 %;p < 0.001). The mean observer-rated level of SDM was also significantly higher after than before (MD = 12.50,95 % CI 5.53-19.47). CONCLUSION The level of SDM was higher after the introduction of the package than before. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study was conducted in a real-life setting in three clinics, both large academic and small rural, offering opportunities for implementation in different type of organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna W M Aarts
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Amsterdam UMC University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Rachel Thompson
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | - Shama S Alam
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Michelle Dannenberg
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA
| | - Tina C Foster
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon NH, USA; Department Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rivero-Santana A, Torrente-Jiménez RS, Perestelo-Pérez L, Torres-Castaño A, Ramos-García V, Bilbao A, Escobar A, Serrano-Aguilar P, Feijoo-Cid M. Effectiveness of a decision aid for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2021; 29:1265-1274. [PMID: 34174455 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 06/03/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of a Patient Decision Aid (PtDA) for knee osteoarthritis. METHOD Randomized controlled trial, in which 193 patients were allocated to the PtDA or usual care. Outcome measures were the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), knowledge of osteoarthritis and arthroplasty, satisfaction with the decision-making process (SDMP) and treatment preference, assessed immediately after the intervention. At 6 months, the same measures were applied in non-operated patients, whereas those who underwent arthroplasty completed the SDMP and the Decisional Regret Scale (DRS). RESULTS The PtDA produced a significant immediate improvement of decisional conflict (MD = -11.65, 95%CI: -14.93, -8.37), objective knowledge (MD = 10.37, 99%IC: 3.15, 17.70) and satisfaction (MD = 6.77, 99%CI: 1.19, 12.34), and a different distribution of preferences (χ2 = 8.74, p = 0.033). Patients with less than secondary education obtained a stronger effect on decisional conflict (p = 0.015 for the interaction) but weaker for knowledge (p = 0.051). At 6 months, there were no significant differences in any variable, including the rate of total knee replacement. Operated patients showed a low level of regret, which was not affected by the intervention. CONCLUSION The PtDA is effective immediately after its application, but it shows no effects in the medium-term. Future research should investigate which subgroups of patients could benefit more from this intervention, as well as the longitudinal evolution of decision-related psychological variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rivero-Santana
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Canary Islands, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain.
| | - R S Torrente-Jiménez
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - L Perestelo-Pérez
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain; Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Canary Islands, Spain.
| | - A Torres-Castaño
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Canary Islands, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain.
| | - V Ramos-García
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Canary Islands, Spain; Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain.
| | - A Bilbao
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain; Osakidetza/Basque Health Service, Research Unit, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - A Escobar
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain; Osakidetza/Basque Health Service, Research Unit, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - P Serrano-Aguilar
- Health Services Research on Chronic Patients Network (REDISSEC), Spain; Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Canary Islands, Spain.
| | - M Feijoo-Cid
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Grup de Recerca Multidisciplinar en Salut i Societat (GREMSAS), (2017SGR 917), Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alokozai A, Bernstein DN, Samuel LT, Kamath AF. Patient Engagement Approaches in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of Two Decades. J Patient Exp 2021; 8:23743735211036525. [PMID: 34435090 PMCID: PMC8381413 DOI: 10.1177/23743735211036525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient engagement is a comprehensive approach to health care where the physician
inspires confidence in the patient to be involved in their own care. Most
research studies of patient engagement in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) have
come in the past 5 years (2015-2020), with no reviews investigating the
different patient engagement methods in TJA. The primary purpose of this review
is to examine patient engagement methods in TJA. The search identified 31
studies aimed at patient engagement methods in TJA. Based on our review, the
conclusions therein strongly suggest that patient engagement methods in TJA
demonstrate benefits throughout care delivery through tools focused on promoting
involvement in decision making and accessible care delivery (eg, virtual
rehabilitation, remote monitoring). Future work should understand the influence
of social determinants on patient involvement in care, and overall cost (or
savings) of engagement methods to patients and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Alokozai
- Tulane University School of
Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | | | - Atul F. Kamath
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
- Atul F. Kamath, Center for Hip
Preservation, Orthopedic and Rheumatologic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500
Euclid Avenue, Mailcode A41, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Menichetti J, Lie HC, Mellblom AV, Brembo EA, Eide H, Gulbrandsen P, Heyn L, Saltveit KH, Strømme H, Sundling V, Turk E, Juvet LK. Tested communication strategies for providing information to patients in medical consultations: A scoping review and quality assessment of the literature. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1891-1903. [PMID: 33516591 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematize the scientific knowledge of empirically tested strategies for verbally providing medical information in patient-physician consultations. METHODS A scoping review searching for terms related to physician, information, oral communication, and controlled study. Four pairs of reviewers screened articles. For each selected study, we assessed the quality and summarized aspects on participants, study, intervention, and outcomes. Information provision strategies were inductively classified by types and main categories. RESULTS After screening 9422 articles, 39 were included. The methodological quality was moderate. We identified four differently used categories of strategies for providing information: cognitive aid (n = 13), persuasive (n = 8), relationship- (n = 3), and objectivity-oriented strategies (n = 4); plus, one "mixed" category (n = 11). Strategies were rarely theoretically derived. CONCLUSIONS Current research of tested strategies for verbally providing medical information is marked by great heterogeneity in methods and outcomes, and lack of theory-driven approaches. The list of strategies could be used to analyse real life communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Findings may aid the harmonization of future efforts to develop empirically-based information provision strategies to be used in clinical and teaching settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Menichetti
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioral Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Anneli V Mellblom
- Department of Behavioral Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Regional Centre for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Eastern and Southern Norway (RBUP), Oslo, Norway.
| | - Espen Andreas Brembo
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Hilde Eide
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | - Pål Gulbrandsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Health Services Research (HØKH) Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
| | - Lena Heyn
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway.
| | | | - Hilde Strømme
- Library of Medicine and Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Vibeke Sundling
- Department of Optometry, Radiography and Lighting Design, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway.
| | - Eva Turk
- Science Centre Health and Technology, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway; Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
| | - Lene K Juvet
- Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway; Norvegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Caverly TJ, Skurla SE, Robinson CH, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Hayward RA. The Need for Brevity During Shared Decision Making (SDM) for Cancer Screening: Veterans' Perspectives on an "Everyday SDM" Compromise. MDM Policy Pract 2021; 6:23814683211055120. [PMID: 34722882 PMCID: PMC8554567 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211055120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Detailed or "full" shared decision making (SDM) about cancer screening is difficult in the primary care setting. Time spent discussing cancer screening is time not spent on other important issues. Given time constraints, brief SDM that is incomplete but addresses key elements may be feasible and acceptable. However, little is known about how patients feel about abbreviated SDM. This study assessed patient perspectives on a compromise solution ("everyday SDM"): 1) primary care provided makes a tailored recommendation, 2) briefly presents qualitative information on key tradeoffs, and 3) conveys full support for decisional autonomy and desires for more information. Methods. We recruited a stratified random sample of Veterans from an academic Veterans Affairs medical center who were eligible for lung cancer screening, oversampling women and minority patients, to attend a 6-hour deliberative focus group. Experts informed participants about cancer screening, factors that influence screening benefits, and the role of patient preferences. Then, facilitator-led small groups elicited patient questions and informed opinions about the everyday SDM proposal, its acceptability, and their recommendations for improvement. Results. Thirty-six Veterans with a heavy smoking history participated (50% male, 83% white). There was a strong consensus that everyday SDM was acceptable if patients were the final deciders and could get more information on request. Participants broadly recommended that clinicians only mention downsides directly related to screening and avoid discussion of potential downstream harms (such as biopsies). Discussion. Although further testing in more diverse populations and different conditions is needed, these patients found the everyday SDM approach to be acceptable for routine lung cancer screening discussions, despite its use of an explicit recommendation and presentation of only qualitative information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanner J. Caverly
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Health Policy Innovation, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Sarah E. Skurla
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Claire H. Robinson
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Rodney A. Hayward
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Institute for Health Policy Innovation, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine TJC, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Nguyen C, Naunton M, Thomas J, Todd L, McEwen J, Bushell M. Availability and use of number needed to treat (NNT) based decision aids for pharmaceutical interventions. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2021; 2:100039. [PMID: 35481125 PMCID: PMC9032485 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2021.100039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The number needed to treat (NNT) is a medical statistic used to gauge the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. The versatility of this absolute effect measure has allowed its use in the formulation of many decision aids to support patients and practitioners in making informed healthcare choices. With the rising number of tools available to health professionals, this review synthesizes what is known of the current NNT-based tools which depict the efficacy of pharmaceutical interventions. Objectives To explore the current spectrum of NNT-based decision aids accessible to health professionals with a focus on the potential utility of these devices by pharmacist practitioners. Methods A literature review was performed in MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychINFO and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Cochrane Methodology Register) for studies published between January 1st 2000 and August 29th 2019. The language was restricted to English unless an appropriate translation existed. Studies that reported NNT-based decision aids of pharmaceutical or therapeutic interventions were included. One author performed study selection and data extraction. Results A total of 365 records were identified, of which 19 NNT-based tools met the eligibility criteria, comprising of 8 tool databases and 11 individual decision aids. Decision aids appeared in multiple forms: databases, pictograms, graphs, interactive applications, calculators and charts. All aids were accessible online with a printer-friendly option, and very few came at a cost (e.g. requiring a subscription or access fee). The main tool innovators were the United Kingdom (UK) and United States (US), with English being the language of choice. Conclusions Evidence that NNT-based decision aids can contribute to greater satisfaction and involvement of patients in medical decision making is limited and inconclusive. A case for the utilization of these tools by pharmacists has yet to be fully examined in the medical research. NNT tools may provide a valuable resource to upskill pharmacists in communication of research evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Nguyen
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Mark Naunton
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Jackson Thomas
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Lyn Todd
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - John McEwen
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| | - Mary Bushell
- University of Canberra, Discipline of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
de Mik SML, Stubenrouch FE, Balm R, Ubbink DT. Development of three different decision support tools to support shared decision-making in vascular surgery. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:282-289. [PMID: 33277102 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) is known to improve quality of care. Particularly in vascular surgery treatment options are often preference-sensitive. Unfortunately, vascular surgeons infrequently apply SDM. Decision support tools (DSTs) have been shown to be helpful in SDM. OBJECTIVE This article describes the development process of three different DSTs to help vascular surgeons and patients apply SDM. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT Patients' information needs were obtained via focus group meetings. Fifty-two patients and eighteen vascular surgeons not involved in the development process evaluated the comprehensibility and usability of the DST-prototypes. METHODS A multidisciplinary steering group commissioned the development of the three DSTs according to international standards. RESULTS Digital decision aids and paper-based consultation cards and decision cards were developed for patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery disease, intermittent claudication or varicose veins. Patients preferred the use of the decision aids followed by consultation cards, whereas vascular surgeons preferred to use decision cards followed by decision aids. DISCUSSION Decision aids, consultation cards and decision cards for four vascular diseases are now available to all vascular surgeons and patients in the Netherlands. The DSTs were well received by both surgeons and patients. English versions are also available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvana M L de Mik
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Surgery, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Fabienne E Stubenrouch
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Surgery, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron Balm
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Surgery, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk T Ubbink
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Surgery, location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
Shared decision making is recommended as a strategy to help patients identify what matters most to them and make informed decisions about musculoskeletal care. In part 5 of the Overcoming Overuse series, we look at the evidence supporting shared decision making as a strategy to help curb overuse. Using shared decision making in clinical consultations may help to reduce the overuse of options that are not beneficial and to increase use of care supported by evidence. Shared decision making could support clinicians in promoting uptake of active rehabilitation options with a favorable balance of benefits to harms. Shared decision making facilitates conversations about unnecessary tests or treatments and could be a key strategy for overcoming overuse. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2021;51(2):53-56. doi:10.2519/jospt.2021.0103.
Collapse
|
29
|
Shared Decision-making in Orthopaedic Surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e1032-e1041. [PMID: 32925380 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process by which the physician and the patient collaborate to arrive at the evidence-based treatment that best aligns with the patient's individual goals of care. The implementation of SDM practices is especially important when an invasive surgical procedure is among the treatment options. Ideally, the variation in the patient treatment choice would mirror the variability in patient goals rather than variation in a physician's ability to communicate effectively. Potentially aiding in these communication efforts, decision aids are tools gaining popularity for their ability to help physicians facilitate the SDM process with patients. This article is intended to give the practicing orthopaedic surgeon an understanding of the concept of SDM and how it can improve physician-patient communication. We will explore the key elements of SDM, attendant benefits, indications, and barriers to implementation and propose steps to begin the incorporation of SDM into practice.
Collapse
|
30
|
Durand MA, Yen RW, O'Malley AJ, Schubbe D, Politi MC, Saunders CH, Dhage S, Rosenkranz K, Margenthaler J, Tosteson ANA, Crayton E, Jackson S, Bradley A, Walling L, Marx CM, Volk RJ, Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Percac-Lima S, Bergin E, Goodwin C, Miller C, Harris C, Barth RJ, Aft R, Feldman S, Cyr AE, Angeles CV, Jiang S, Elwyn G. What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata. Cancer 2020; 127:422-436. [PMID: 33170506 PMCID: PMC7983934 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Background Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) with early‐stage breast cancer are more likely to report poorer physician‐patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery, lower involvement in decision making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. The objective of this study was to understand how to support women across socioeconomic strata in making breast cancer surgery choices. Methods We conducted a 3‐arm (Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, and usual care), multisite, randomized controlled superiority trial with surgeon‐level randomization. The Option Grid (text only) and Picture Option Grid (pictures plus text) conversation aids were evidence‐based summaries of available breast cancer surgery options on paper. Decision quality (primary outcome), treatment choice, treatment intention, shared decision making (SDM), anxiety, quality of life, decision regret, and coordination of care were measured from T0 (pre‐consultation) to T5 (1‐year after surgery. Results Sixteen surgeons saw 571 of 622 consented patients. Patients in the Picture Option Grid arm (n = 248) had higher knowledge (immediately after the visit [T2] and 1 week after surgery or within 2 weeks of the first postoperative visit [T3]), an improved decision process (T2 and T3), lower decision regret (T3), and more SDM (observed and self‐reported) compared to usual care (n = 257). Patients in the Option Grid arm (n = 66) had higher decision process scores (T2 and T3), better coordination of care (12 weeks after surgery or within 2 weeks of the second postoperative visit [T4]), and more observed SDM (during the surgical visit [T1]) compared to usual care arm. Subgroup analyses suggested that the Picture Option Grid had more impact among women of lower SES and health literacy. Neither intervention affected concordance, treatment choice, or anxiety. Conclusions Paper‐based conversation aids improved key outcomes over usual care. The Picture Option Grid had more impact among disadvantaged patients. Lay Summary The objective of this study was to understand how to help women with lower incomes or less formal education to make breast cancer surgery choices. Compared with usual care, a conversation aid with pictures and text led to higher knowledge. It improved the decision process and shared decision making (SDM) and lowered decision regret. A text‐only conversation aid led to an improved decision process, more coordinated care, and higher SDM compared to usual care. The conversation aid with pictures was more helpful for women with lower income or less formal education. Conversation aids with pictures and text helped women make better breast cancer surgery choices.
A paper‐based pictorial conversation aid (pictures plus text) is beneficial to all patients with early‐stage breast cancer and particularly to disadvantaged patients. Between‐surgeon variation suggests that the maximal impact of such interventions requires standardized physician training combined with these interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne Durand
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,UMR 1027 Team EQUITY, Paul Sabatier University, Toulouse, France
| | - Renata W Yen
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - A James O'Malley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Danielle Schubbe
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Mary C Politi
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Shubhada Dhage
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Julie Margenthaler
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire.,Norris Cotton Cancer Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Eloise Crayton
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Sherrill Jackson
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Ann Bradley
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Linda Walling
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Christine M Marx
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Robert J Volk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Karen Sepucha
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elissa Ozanne
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Sanja Percac-Lima
- Massachusetts General Hospital Chelsea HealthCare Center, Chelsea, Massachusetts
| | | | - Courtney Goodwin
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Camille Harris
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | - Rebecca Aft
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Amy E Cyr
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yen RW, Durand MA, Harris C, Cohen S, Ward A, O'Malley AJ, Schubbe D, Saunders CH, Elwyn G. Text-only and picture conversation aids both supported shared decision making for breast cancer surgery: Analysis from a cluster randomized trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:2235-2243. [PMID: 32782181 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine if two encounter conversation aids for early-stage breast cancer surgery increased observed and patient-reported shared decision making (SDM) compared with usual care and if observed and patient-reported SDM were associated. METHODS Surgeons in a cluster randomized trial at four cancer centers were randomized to use an Option Grid, Picture Option Grid, or usual care. We used bivariate statistics, linear regression, and multilevel models to evaluate the influence of trial arm, patient socioeconomic status and health literacy on observed SDM (via OPTION-5) and patient-reported SDM (via collaboRATE). RESULTS From 311 recordings, OPTION-5 scores were 73/100 for Option Grid (n = 40), 56.3/100 for Picture Option Grid (n = 144), and 41.0/100 for usual care (n = 127; p < 0.0001). Top collaboRATE scores were 81.6 % for Option Grid, 80.0 % for Picture Option Grid, and 56.4 % for usual care (p < 0.001). Top collaboRATE scores correlated with an 8.60 point (95 %CI 0.66, 13.7) higher OPTION-5 score (p = 0.008) with no correlation in the multilevel analysis. Patients of lower socioeconomic status had lower OPTION-5 scores before accounting for clustering. CONCLUSIONS Both conversation aids led to meaningfully higher observed and patient-reported SDM. Observed and patient-reported SDM were not strongly correlated. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Healthcare providers could implement these conversation aids in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata W Yen
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA; Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Camille Harris
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | | | | | - A James O'Malley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Danielle Schubbe
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Catherine H Saunders
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA; Centers for Health and Aging, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Décary S, Toupin-April K, Légaré F, Barton JL. Five Golden Rings to Measure Patient-Centered Care in Rheumatology. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2020; 72 Suppl 10:686-702. [PMID: 33091246 DOI: 10.1002/acr.24244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Décary
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- Oregon Health & Science University and US Department of Veteran Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Caverly TJ, Hayward RA. Dealing with the Lack of Time for Detailed Shared Decision-making in Primary Care: Everyday Shared Decision-making. J Gen Intern Med 2020; 35:3045-3049. [PMID: 32779137 PMCID: PMC7572954 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06043-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Policymakers and researchers are strongly encouraging clinicians to support patient autonomy through shared decision-making (SDM). In setting policies for clinical care, decision-makers need to understand that current models of SDM have tended to focus on major decisions (e.g., surgeries and chemotherapy) and focused less on everyday primary care decisions. Most decisions in primary care are substantive everyday decisions: intermediate-stakes decisions that occur dozens of times every day, yet are non-trivial for patients, such as whether routine mammography should start at age 40, 45, or 50. Expectations that busy clinicians use current models of SDM (here referred to as "detailed" SDM) for these decisions can feel overwhelming to clinicians. Evidence indicates that detailed SDM is simply not realistic for most of these decisions and without a feasible alternative, clinicians usually default to a decision-making approach with little to no personalization. We propose, for discussion and refinement, a compromise approach to personalizing these decisions (everyday SDM). Everyday SDM is based on a feasible process for supporting patient autonomy that also allows clinicians to continue being respectful health advocates for their patients. We propose that alternatives to detailed SDM are needed to make progress toward more patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanner J. Caverly
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Health Policy Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| | - Rodney A. Hayward
- VA Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- Institute for Health Policy Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Barcellona MG. Symptom versus condition modifying care: Can such a dichotomy be useful? PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2020.1825034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Giuseppe Barcellona
- Physiotherapy Department, King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Surrey Hills Physiotherapy Ltd, Dorking, Surrey, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
de Mik SML, Stubenrouch FE, Legemate DA, Balm R, Ubbink DT. Improving shared decision-making in vascular surgery by implementing decision support tools: study protocol for the stepped-wedge cluster-randomised OVIDIUS trial. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020; 20:172. [PMID: 32703205 PMCID: PMC7376920 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-020-01186-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision-making improves the quality of patient care. Unfortunately, shared decision-making is not yet common practice among vascular surgeons. Thus, decision support tools were developed to assist vascular surgeons and their patients in using shared decision-making. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of decision support tools to improve shared decision-making during vascular surgical consultations in which a treatment decision is to be made. Methods The study design is a multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial. Eligible patients are adult patients, visiting the outpatient clinic of a participating medical centre for whom several treatment options are feasible and who face a primary treatment decision for their abdominal aortic aneurysm, carotid artery disease, intermittent claudication, or varicose veins. Patients and vascular surgeons in the intervention group receive decision support tools that may help them adopt shared decision-making when making the final treatment decision. These decision support tools are decision aids, consultation cards, decision cards, and a practical training. Decision aids are informative websites that help patients become more aware of the pros and cons of the treatment options and their preferences regarding the treatment choice. Consultation cards with text or decision cards with images are used by vascular surgeons during consultation to determine which aspect of a treatment is most important to their patient. In the training vascular surgeons can practice shared decision-making with a patient actor, guided by a medical psychologist. This trial aims to include 502 vascular surgical patients to achieve a clinically relevant improvement in shared decision-making of 10 out of 100 points, using the 5-item OPTION instrument to score the audio-recordings of consultations. Discussion In the OVIDIUS trial the available decision support tools for vascular surgical patients are implemented in clinical practice. We will evaluate whether these tools actually improve shared decision-making in the consultation room. The stepped-wedge cluster-randomised study design will ensure that at the end of the study all participating centres have implemented at least some of the decision support tools and thereby a certain level of shared decision-making. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Registry, NTR6487. Registered 7 June 2017. URL: http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=6487
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M L de Mik
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F E Stubenrouch
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D A Legemate
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Balm
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D T Ubbink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Initial User Testing of Decision Aids for Multiple Sclerosis Disease-Modifying Therapies. J Neurosci Nurs 2020; 52:160-165. [PMID: 32511174 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are the cornerstone of multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment. DMT treatment is a preference-sensitive decision in which shared decision making is indicated. METHODS We used qualitative methods to explore usability of MS decision aids in people aged 18 to 70 years diagnosed with MS. Semistructured interviews aimed to assess patients' overall reaction to using the decision aids. This included specific aspects of the user experience to improve readability, format, content, and patient opinions about whether the integration of the decision aids into visits with MS clinicians would be feasible and assist with making better DMT selections. RESULTS Twenty-three interviews were completed with eligible patients with MS aged 18 to 70 years to improve readability. Using thematic analysis, 5 themes emerged from the analysis including decision aids are easy and understandable, include cost, prioritize side effects and tests, increase font size, and have a simpler injectable grid. We also identified areas for improvement including formatting, side effects of DMT options, transparency of data sources, research, and development. CONCLUSION Overall findings suggest that the decision aids are usable, easy to understand, and helpful to facilitate shared decision making for DMT selection. This work will help guide further modifications to the prototype MS decision aids before publication and can inform the growing body of knowledge regarding the development of high-quality decision aids.
Collapse
|
37
|
Hurley VB, Wang Y, Rodriguez HP, Shortell SM, Kearing S, Savitz LA. Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14:23-32. [PMID: 32021114 PMCID: PMC6954078 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s227207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) research has emphasized the role of decision aids (DAs) for helping patients make treatment decisions reflective of their preferences, yet there have been few collaborative multi-institutional efforts to integrate DAs in orthopedic consultations and primary care encounters. OBJECTIVE In the context of routine DA implementation for SDM, we investigate which patient-level characteristics are associated with patient preferences for surgery versus medical management before and after exposure to DAs. We explored whether DA implementation in primary care encounters was associated with greater shifts in patients' treatment preferences after exposure to DAs compared to DA implementation in orthopedic consultations. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING 10 High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) health systems. STUDY PARTICIPANTS A total of 495 hip and 1343 adult knee osteoarthritis patients who were exposed to DAs within HVHC systems between July 2012 to June 2015. RESULTS Nearly 20% of knee patients and 17% of hip patients remained uncertain about their treatment preferences after viewing DAs. Older patients and patients with high pain levels had an increased preference for surgery. Older patients receiving DAs from three HVHC systems that transitioned DA implementation from orthopedics into primary care had lower odds of preferring surgery after DA exposure compared to older patients in seven HVHC systems that only implemented DAs for orthopedic consultations. CONCLUSION Patients' treatment preferences were largely stable over time, highlighting that DAs for SDM largely do not necessarily shift preferences. DAs and SDM processes should be targeted at older adults and patients reporting high pain levels. Initiating treatment conversations in primary versus specialty care settings may also have important implications for engagement of patients in SDM via DAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanessa B Hurley
- Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC20057, USA
| | | | - Hector P Rodriguez
- Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA94720, USA
| | - Stephen M Shortell
- Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA94720, USA
| | | | - Lucy A Savitz
- Center for Health Research (Northwest and Hawaii), Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR97227, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Hehl JM, McDonald DD. The Electronic Pain Management Life History Calendar: Development and Usability. Pain Manag Nurs 2019; 21:134-141. [PMID: 31786149 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 08/30/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes over time to self-managed chronic pain treatments are not a routine part of pain management discussions and might provide insight into adjustments that improve pain outcomes. AIMS The purpose of this study was to develop and test an electronic pain management life history calendar (ePMLHC) for use with older adults with chronic pain. DESIGN An instrument development design was used to develop and test the ePMLHC. METHODS Twenty-four community-dwelling older adults with osteoarthritis pain completed the ePMLHC describing their pain treatment regimens and treatment response history. Accuracy of the ePMLHC data was examined through post-ePMLHC audiorecorded interviews, with the older adults describing their pain treatment history. Feedback on use of the ePMLHC was also measured. An iterative process was used to refine and retest the ePMLHC. The final ePMLHC version was examined with the remaining 12 older adults. RESULTS Significant differences between data reported via the ePMLHC and interviews did not support feasibility of independently reported data via the ePMLHC. Older adults reported that completing the ePMLHC helped them more fully self-reflect on their pain self-management. CONCLUSIONS The ePMLHC has the potential to enhance communication about past pain management treatments and promote more personalized pain treatment regimens, but further development is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Hehl
- Bone and Joint Institute at Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut.
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Jeon YH, Flaherty I, Urban H, Wortley S, Dickson C, Salkeld G, Hunter DJ. Qualitative Evaluation of Evidence-Based Online Decision Aid and Resources for Osteoarthritis Management: Understanding Patient Perspectives. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019; 71:46-55. [PMID: 29609208 DOI: 10.1002/acr.23572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To qualitatively examine the experiences with, and impact of, evidence-based online resources in self-management among Australians with osteoarthritis. METHODS Telephone interviews were conducted with 36 users of a novel osteoarthritis resource, the Osteoarthritis Awareness Hub. Rogers' 5 attributes of innovation (relative advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability) and outcomes guided the semistructured interview and analysis. Maximum variation sampling was used, and data saturation occurred after 33 interviews. A coding scheme was agreed upon and all interview data were entered into NVivo for qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Study participants had high levels of literacy and health literacy. For adoption and implementation of an innovation, the participants' narratives confirmed and underscored the fact that it was important that it come from an authoritative and trusting voice and that its perceived benefits align with participants' values and existing practices (relative advantage and compatibility). The participants also valued seeing the practical benefits of the innovation, such as its capacity to impart quality and balanced new insights and information, and to maintain and monitor their personal progress. Notably, many participants spoke about the mental and physical health benefits that they derived from engagement with the online resources. CONCLUSION Our study findings confirm that web-based tools can be a useful adjunct to patients adopting self-management strategies. Rogers' theory provides a framework for a deeper appreciation of the how, why, and what questions concerning the adoption and implementation processes, especially among people with good technology and health literacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Hee Jeon
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian Flaherty
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hema Urban
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, and University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sally Wortley
- University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Dickson
- Arthritis Australia and Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Glenn Salkeld
- University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David J Hunter
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, and University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Scalia P, Durand MA, Forcino RC, Schubbe D, Barr PJ, O’Brien N, O’Malley AJ, Foster T, Politi MC, Laughlin-Tommaso S, Banks E, Madden T, Anchan RM, Aarts JWM, Velentgas P, Balls-Berry J, Bacon C, Adams-Foster M, Mulligan CC, Venable S, Cochran NE, Elwyn G. Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol. Implement Sci 2019; 14:88. [PMID: 31477140 PMCID: PMC6721118 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-019-0933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine fibroids are non-cancerous overgrowths of the smooth muscle in the uterus. As they grow, some cause problems such as heavy menstrual bleeding, pelvic pain, discomfort during sexual intercourse, and rarely pregnancy complications or difficulty becoming pregnant. Multiple treatment options are available. The lack of comparative evidence demonstrating superiority of any one treatment means that choosing the best option is sensitive to individual preferences. Women with fibroids wish to consider treatment trade-offs. Tools known as patient decision aids (PDAs) are effective in increasing patient engagement in the decision-making process. However, the implementation of PDAs in routine care remains challenging. Our aim is to use a multi-component implementation strategy to implement the uterine fibroids Option Grid™ PDAs at five organizational settings in the USA. METHODS We will conduct a randomized stepped-wedge implementation study where five sites will be randomized to implement the uterine fibroid Option Grid PDA in practice at different time points. Implementation will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Normalization Process Theory (NPT). There will be a 6-month pre-implementation phase, a 2-month initiation phase where participating clinicians will receive training and be introduced to the Option Grid PDAs (available in text, picture, or online formats), and a 6-month active implementation phase where clinicians will be expected to use the PDAs with patients who are assigned female sex at birth, are at least 18 years of age, speak fluent English or Spanish, and have new or recurrent symptoms of uterine fibroids. We will exclude postmenopausal patients. Our primary outcome measure is the number of eligible patients who receive the Option Grid PDAs. We will use logistic and linear regression analyses to compare binary and continuous quantitative outcome measures (including survey scores and Option Grid use) between the pre- and active implementation phases while adjusting for patient and clinician characteristics. DISCUSSION This study may help identify the factors that impact the implementation and sustained use of a PDA in clinic workflow from various stakeholder perspectives while helping patients with uterine fibroids make treatment decisions that align with their preferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03985449. Registered 13 July 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03985449.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Rachel C. Forcino
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Danielle Schubbe
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Paul J. Barr
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Nancy O’Brien
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - A. James O’Malley
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Tina Foster
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Mary C. Politi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA
| | | | - Erika Banks
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Tessa Madden
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO USA
| | - Raymond M. Anchan
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
| | - Johanna W. M. Aarts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Carla Bacon
- National Uterine Fibroids Foundation, Colorado Springs, CO USA
| | - Monica Adams-Foster
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Carrie Cahill Mulligan
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | | | - Nancy E. Cochran
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, 5th floor, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Scalia P, Durand MA, Berkowitz JL, Ramesh NP, Faber MJ, Kremer JAM, Elwyn G. The impact and utility of encounter patient decision aids: Systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:817-841. [PMID: 30612829 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2018] [Revised: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effect of encounter patient decision aids (PDAs) as evaluated in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a narrative synthesis of non-randomized studies assessing feasibility, utility and their integration into clinical workflows. METHODS Databases were systematically searched for RCTs of encounter PDAs to enable the conduct of a meta-analysis. We used a framework analysis approach to conduct a narrative synthesis of non-randomized studies. RESULTS We included 23 RCTs and 30 non-randomized studies. Encounter PDAs significantly increased knowledge (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI 0.30, 0.55), lowered decisional conflict (SMD= -0.33; 95% CI -0.56, -0.09), increased observational-based assessment of shared decision making (SMD = 0.94; 95% CI 0.40, 1.48) and satisfaction with the decision-making process (OR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.19, 2.66) without increasing visit durations (SMD= -0.06; 95% CI -0.29, 0.16). The narrative synthesis showed that encounter tools have high utility for patients and clinicians, yet important barriers to implementation exist (i.e. time constraints) at the clinical and organizational level. CONCLUSION Encounter PDAs have a positive impact on patient-clinician collaboration, despite facing implementation barriers. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS The potential utility of encounter PDAs requires addressing the systemic and structural barriers that prevent adoption in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Scalia
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Julia L Berkowitz
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Nithya P Ramesh
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Marjan J Faber
- Radboud university medical center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, the Netherlands.
| | - Jan A M Kremer
- Radboud university medical center, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, PO Box 9101, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, the Netherlands.
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Barr PJ, Forcino RC, Dannenberg MD, Mishra M, Turner E, Zisman-Ilani Y, Matthews J, Hinn M, Bruce M, Elwyn G. Healthcare Options for People Experiencing Depression (HOPE*D): the development and pilot testing of an encounter-based decision aid for use in primary care. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e025375. [PMID: 30962232 PMCID: PMC6500310 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and pilot an encounter-based decision aid (eDA) for people with depression for use in primary care. DESIGN We developed an eDA for depression through cognitive interviews and pilot tested it using a one-group pretest, post-test design in primary care. Feasibility, fidelity of eDA use and acceptability were assessed using recruitment rates and semistructured interviews with patients, medical assistants and clinicians. Treatment choice and shared decision-making (SDM) were also assessed. SETTING Interviews with adult patients and the public were conducted in a mall and library in Grafton County, New Hampshire, while clinician interviews took place by phone or at the clinician's office. Pilot testing occurred in a New Hampshire primary care practice. PARTICIPANTS Cognitive interviews were conducted with adults, ≥18 years, who could read English from the following stakeholder groups: history of depression, the public and clinicians. Patients with a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score of ≥5 were recruited for piloting. RESULTS Three stages of cognitive interviews were conducted (n=28). Changes to eDA included moving the combination therapy information and access to treatment information, adding colour, modifying pictograms and editing the talk-therapy description. Clinician concerns about patient health literacy were not reflected in patient interviews. Of 59 patients who reviewed study information, 56 were eligible and agreed to participate in pilot testing; however, only 29 could be reached for follow-up. The eDA was widely accepted, though clinicians did not always use it as intended. We found no impact of eDA use on SDM, though patients chose a wider range of treatment options. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the feasibility of the use of an eDA for depression in primary care that was widely accepted. Further research is needed to improve the fidelity with which the eDA is used and to assess its impact on SDM and related health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Barr
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Rachel C Forcino
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Michelle D Dannenberg
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Manish Mishra
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Erick Turner
- Behavioral Health and Neurosciences Division, Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University School of Medicine, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yaara Zisman-Ilani
- The Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Martha Bruce
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Departments of Psychiatry and Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bossen JKJ, van der Weijden T, Driessen EW, Heyligers IC. Experienced barriers in shared decision-making behaviour of orthopaedic surgery residents compared with orthopaedic surgeons. Musculoskeletal Care 2019; 17:198-205. [PMID: 30811094 PMCID: PMC6850155 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In shared decision-making (SDM), physicians encourage the patient to participate in the care process. The theory of planned behaviour describes that behaviour is dependent on intention. In its turn, intention is explained by attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control. In orthopaedics, little is known about current SDM behaviour and how to promote it.The aim of the present study was to gain insight into the SDM behaviour of orthopaedic residents and supervisors by measuring levels of intention, attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control. Furthermore, we aimed to determine the predictors of intention for SDM. METHODS A questionnaire survey study was conducted among orthopaedic surgeons and residents working in the care of hip and knee osteoarthritis, to determine their intentions, attitudes, subjective norms and perceived behavioural control regarding SDM. RESULTS Of the 385 physicians approached, 71 residents and 64 orthopaedic surgeons participated. Residents and the supervisors alike had positive intentions regarding SDM. Intention for SDM behaviour was explained by attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control, with perceived behavioural control having the strongest association. In residents, the intention to engage in SDM was more hampered by a lower level of perceived behavioural control than in surgeons. CONCLUSIONS Physicians are willing to perform SDM and consider SDM as favourable in the orthopaedic clinic. The implementation of SDM is mainly hampered by experienced barriers that they cannot control. These findings underline the importance of incorporating SDM in the curriculum of postgraduates. Possibilities for efficient SDM implementation should be explored, to overcome perceived barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeroen K J Bossen
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Department of Family Medicine, School CAPHRI, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik W Driessen
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ide C Heyligers
- School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hahlweg P, Witzel I, Müller V, Elwyn G, Durand MA, Scholl I. Adaptation and qualitative evaluation of encounter decision aids in breast cancer care. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019; 299:1141-1149. [PMID: 30649604 PMCID: PMC6435605 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Shared decision-making is currently not widely implemented in breast cancer care. Encounter decision aids support shared decision-making by helping patients and physicians compare treatment options. So far, little was known about adaptation needs for translated encounter decision aids, and encounter decision aids for breast cancer treatments were not available in Germany. This study aimed to adapt and evaluate the implementation of two encounter decision aids on breast cancer treatments in routine care. Methods We conducted a multi-phase qualitative study: (1) translation of two breast cancer Option Grid™ decision aids; comparison to national clinical standards; cognitive interviews to test patients’ understanding; (2) focus groups to assess acceptability; (3) testing in routine care using participant observation. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results Physicians and patients reacted positively to the idea of encounter decision aids, and reported being interested in using them; patients were most receptive. Several adaptation cycles were necessary. Uncertainty about feasibility of using encounter decision aids in clinical settings was the main physician-reported barrier. During real-world testing (N = 77 encounters), physicians used encounter decision aids in one-third of potentially relevant encounters. However, they did not use the encounter decision aids to stimulate dialogue, which is contrary to their original scope and purpose. Conclusions The idea of using encounter decision aids was welcomed, but more by patients than by physicians. Adaptation was a complex process and required resources. Clinicians did not follow suggested strategies for using encounter decision aids. Our study indicates that production of encounter decision aids alone will not lead to successful implementation, and has to be accompanied by training of health care providers. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00404-018-5035-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pola Hahlweg
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Level 5, Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Marie-Anne Durand
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Level 5, Williamson Translational Research Building, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Scalia P, Elwyn G, Barr P, Song J, Zisman-Ilani Y, Lesniak M, Mullin S, Kurek K, Bushell M, Durand MA. Exploring the use of Option Grid™ patient decision aids in a sample of clinics in Poland. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2018; 134:1-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
46
|
Allen KD, Golightly YM, White DK. Gaps in appropriate use of treatment strategies in osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2018; 31:746-759. [PMID: 30509418 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Optimal management of osteoarthritis (OA) requires a combination of therapies, with behavioral (e.g., exercise and weight management) and rehabilitative components at the core, accompanied by pharmacological treatments and, in later stages, consideration of joint replacement surgery. Although multiple sets of OA treatment guidelines have been developed, there are gaps in the implementation of these recommendations. Key areas of concern include the underuse of exercise, weight management, and other behavioral and rehabilitation strategies as well as the overuse of opioid analgesics. In this review, we describe the major categories of treatment strategies for OA, including self-management, physical activity, weight management, physical therapy and other rehabilitative therapies, pharmacotherapies, and joint replacement surgery. For each category, we discuss the current evidence base to report on appropriate use, data regarding adherence to treatment recommendations, and potential approaches to optimize use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli D Allen
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina, Center for Health Services Research in Primary Care, Department of Veterans Affairs Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Yvonne M Golightly
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health/Division of Physical Therapy/Thurston Arthritis Research Center, School of Medicine/Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina, 3300 Thurston Bldg., CB# 7280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7280, USA.
| | - Daniel K White
- Department of Physical Therapy University of Delaware, 540 South College Ave, 210L, Newark, DE, 19713, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
What matters most: protocol for a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery encounter decision aids across socioeconomic strata. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:241. [PMID: 29439691 PMCID: PMC5812033 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5109-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in women. Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) have equivalent survival for early stage breast cancer. However, each surgery has different benefits and harms that women may value differently. Women of lower socioeconomic status (SES) diagnosed with early stage breast cancer are more likely to experience poorer doctor-patient communication, lower satisfaction with surgery and decision-making, and higher decision regret compared to women of higher SES. They often play a more passive role in decision-making and are less likely to undergo BCS. Our aim is to understand how best to support women of lower SES in making decisions about early stage breast cancer treatments and to reduce disparities in decision quality across socioeconomic strata. Methods We will conduct a three-arm, multi-site randomized controlled superiority trial with stratification by SES and clinician-level randomization. At four large cancer centers in the United States, 1100 patients (half higher SES and half lower SES) will be randomized to: (1) Option Grid, (2) Picture Option Grid, or (3) usual care. Interviews, field-notes, and observations will be used to explore strategies that promote the interventions’ sustained use and dissemination. Community-Based Participatory Research will be used throughout. We will include women aged at least 18 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of early stage breast cancer (I to IIIA) from both higher and lower SES, provided they speak English, Spanish, or Mandarin Chinese. Our primary outcome measure is the 16-item validated Decision Quality Instrument. We will use a regression framework, mediation analyses, and multiple informants analysis. Heterogeneity of treatment effects analyses for SES, age, ethnicity, race, literacy, language, and study site will be performed. Discussion Currently, women of lower SES are more likely to make treatment decisions based on incomplete or uninformed preferences, potentially leading to poorer decision quality, quality of life, and decision regret. This study hopes to identify solutions that effectively improve patient-centered care across socioeconomic strata and reduce disparities in decision and care quality. Trial registration NCT03136367 at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol version: Manuscript based on study protocol version 2.2, 7 November 2017. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-018-5109-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
48
|
Elwyn G, Rasmussen J, Kinsey K, Firth J, Marrin K, Edwards A, Wood F. On a learning curve for shared decision making: Interviews with clinicians using the knee osteoarthritis Option Grid. J Eval Clin Pract 2018; 24:56-64. [PMID: 27860101 DOI: 10.1111/jep.12665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Revised: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
RATIONAL Tools used in clinical encounters to illustrate to patients the risks and benefits of treatment options have been shown to increase shared decision making. However, we do not have good information about how these tools are viewed by clinicians and how clinicians think patients would react to their use. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to examine clinicians' views about the possible and actual use of tools designed to support patients and clinicians to collaborate and deliberate about treatment options, namely, Option Grid decision aids. METHOD We conducted a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews embedded in the intervention phase of a trial of an Option Grid decision aid for osteoarthritis of the knee. Interviews were conducted with 6 participating clinicians before they used the tool and again after clinicians had used the tool with 6 patients. RESULTS In the first interview, clinicians voiced concerns that the tool would lead to an increase in encounter duration, patient resistance regarding involvement in decision making, and potential information overload. At the second interview, after minimal training, the clinicians reported that the tool had changed their usual way of communicating, and it was generally acceptable and helpful to integrate it into practice. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS After experiencing the use of Option Grids, clinicians became more willing to use the tools in their clinical encounters with patients. How best to introduce Option Grids to clinicians and adopt their use into practice will need careful consideration of context, workflow, and clinical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Julie Rasmussen
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Jill Firth
- Pennine MSK Partnership Ltd, Integrated Care Centre, Oldham, UK
| | - Katy Marrin
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Fiona Wood
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Topp J, Westenhöfer J, Scholl I, Hahlweg P. Shared decision-making in physical therapy: A cross-sectional study on physiotherapists' knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:346-351. [PMID: 28779911 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2017] [Revised: 07/24/2017] [Accepted: 07/25/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed a) to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) among physiotherapists in Germany, b) to explore their association with demographic characteristics, and c) to assess barriers to the implementation of SDM. METHODS We assessed above mentioned domains using an online survey. Two-level logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with knowledge, attitudes and self-reported use of SDM. RESULTS 60.5% of a total sample of 357 participants reported to have had no knowledge on SDM before participating in the survey. Attitudes towards SDM were mostly positive, half of all participants expressed a preference for SDM. About two thirds of all participants reported to use a rather paternalistic approach in routine care. Knowledge, attitudes, and self-reported use of SDM were associated with several demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION SDM was perceived as an appropriate concept in physiotherapy. However, missing knowledge and limited self-reported use of SDM in routine care on the one hand and positive attitudes towards SDM on the other hand indicate a need for action. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS In order to emphasize the use of SDM in physiotherapy efforts need to be undertaken in research, clinical practice and health policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janine Topp
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Health Sciences, Competence Center Health, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Joachim Westenhöfer
- Department of Health Sciences, Competence Center Health, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Isabelle Scholl
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Pola Hahlweg
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Barnett ER, Boucher EA, Daviss WB, Elwyn G. Supporting Shared Decision-making for Children's Complex Behavioral Problems: Development and User Testing of an Option Grid™ Decision Aid. Community Ment Health J 2018; 54:7-16. [PMID: 28401416 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0136-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2016] [Accepted: 03/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
There is a lack of research to guide collaborative treatment decision-making for children who have complex behavioral problems, despite the extensive use of mental health services in this population. We developed and pilot-tested a one-page Option Grid™ patient decision aid to facilitate shared decision-making for these situations. An editorial team of parents, child psychiatrists, researchers, and other stakeholders developed the scope and structure of the decision aid. Researchers included information about a carefully chosen number of psychosocial and pharmacological treatment options, using descriptions based on the best available evidence. Using semi-structured qualitative interviews (n = 18), we conducted user testing with four parents and four clinical prescribers and field testing with four parents, four clinical prescribers, and two clinic administrators. The researchers coded and synthesized the interview responses using mixed inductive and deductive methods. Parents, clinicians, and administrators felt the Option Grid had significant value, although they reported that additional training and other support would be required in order to successfully implement the Option Grid and achieve shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin R Barnett
- Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth Trauma Interventions Research Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
| | - Elizabeth A Boucher
- Center for Program Design and Evaluation at Dartmouth, 21 Lafayette #373, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - William B Daviss
- Department of Psychiatry, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Psychiatric Associates, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| |
Collapse
|