The role of patient education and physician support in self-efficacy for skin self-examination among patients with melanoma

Advances in Early Detection of Melanoma and the Future of At-Home Testing

The past decade has seen numerous advancements in approaches to melanoma detection, each with the common goal to stem the growing incidence of melanoma and its mortality rate. These advancements, while well documented to increase early melanoma detection, have also garnered considerable criticism of their efficacy for improving survival rates. In this review, we discuss the current state of such early detection approaches that do not require direct dermatologist intervention. Our findings suggest that a number of at-home and non-specialist methods exist with high accuracy for detecting melanoma, albeit with a few notable concerns worth further investigation. Additionally, research continues to find new approaches using artificial intelligence which have promise for the future.

Dermatologic Follow-up and Assessment of Suspicious Lesions

As our knowledge and understanding of melanoma evolve, melanoma surveillance guidelines will reflect these findings. Currently, there is no consensus across international guidelines for melanoma follow-up. However, it is accepted that more aggressive surveillance is recommended for more advanced disease. When examining high-risk individuals, a systematic approach should be followed. Future considerations include the use of noninvasive imaging techniques, 'liquid biopsies,' and artificial intelligence to enhance detection of melanomas.

The impact of physician support on skin self-examination among melanoma patients: A serial mediation model with self-efficacy and intentions to perform skin exams

OBJECTIVE

Melanoma is the most lethal of skin cancers; however, survival rates are excellent if the tumor is detected early. Clinical practice guidelines for melanoma follow-up care recommend regular skin self-examination (SSE) for individuals at high risk for melanoma. The current analyses tested whether self-efficacy for SSE and intention to perform SSE mediate the relationship between physician support for SSE and SSE behavior among a sample of melanoma patients.

METHODS

We ran a serial mediation model on a cross-sectional sample of melanoma patients (n = 154) drawn from an observational study with longitudinal follow-up.

RESULTS

Self-efficacy and intention to perform SSE sequentially mediated the relationship between physician support and SSE behaviors (β = .31, t(152) = 3.61, p < .001 without mediators versus β = .11, t(150) = 1.50, p = .14 with mediators), as supported by a significant total indirect effect (β = .21, [95 % CI = .08-.35]).

CONCLUSION

Self-efficacy for SSE and intention to perform SSE together explain the link between perceived physician support for SSE and the practice of SSE.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Physician communication about the importance of SSE plays an important role in encouraging patient adherence to SSE recommendations and, thus, supporting early detection efforts.

Prevalence and correlates of skin self-examination behaviors among melanoma survivors: a systematic review

Melanoma is the most common cause of skin cancer deaths, and individuals who have had melanoma have an increased risk of developing new melanomas. Doing regular self-examinations of skin enables one to detect thinner melanomas earlier when the disease is more treatable. The aim of this systematic review is to characterize and evaluate the existing literature on the prevalence and correlates of skin self-examination (SSE) behaviors among adult melanoma survivors in the USA and Canada. A computerized literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. The inclusion criteria for the studies were: (a) reported results for adult melanoma survivors in the USA or Canada, (b) papers described empirical research, (c) assessed SSE and related behaviors, and (d) papers were published in a peer-reviewed journal in the past 20 years. Key phrases such as "skin self-examination/SSE in melanoma survivors in the United States" and "correlates of skin self-examination/SSE" were used. Based on the inclusion criteria, 30 studies were included in the systematic review. SSE prevalence varied depending on how SSE was defined. Demographics and factors (gender, education level, patient characteristics, partner assistance, and physician support) associated with SSE were identified. Findings of this review show evidence for the need to have a consistent way to assess SSE and suggest different types of correlates on which to focus in order to promote SSE and reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence in survivors. This systematic review and its protocol have been registered in the international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health and social care (PROSPERO; ID: 148878).

Patient-Focused Online Resources for Melanoma: Highly Variable Content and Quality

When patients are diagnosed or concerned with the diagnosis of melanoma, they commonly use the Internet for information. We assessed the content of patient-focused websites about melanoma. We searched for "melanoma" in four search engines then assessed the first 30 websites in each search. Among included sites, we describe potentially useful content about melanoma: website quality, readability, popularity, and social media sharing. In 31 included websites, > 80% mentioned the definition and risk factors for melanoma, when to seek medical help, how to diagnose, and treatment options, and > 70% described preventive measures. However, website quality was variable: 61% of websites had disclosures, 54% were dated, 41% had a clear author, and 41% had references. Average readability ranged from 8th to 12th grade, which is above recommended reading levels for patient websites. Despite this variation and high reading levels, we identified many high-quality melanoma websites for patients.

Specializing Nurses as An Indirect Education Program for Stoma Patients

Education programs are beneficial for patients with different chronic conditions. Prior studies have examined direct education, where information is transferred directly to patients. In contrast, in this program, information is transferred directly to nurses who become specialists and transfer education individually to patients. Hence, this paper evaluates the impact of having specialist nurses for stoma patients at hospitals, as those nurses provide healthcare to patients but also inform and educate patients about their condition and needs. The analysis uses an observational study with ostomized patients in Spain at hospitals with and without specialist nurses, and measures health service utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQL), besides performing a cost analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis at both types of hospitals. The results show that patients with access to specialist nurses self-manage better, present lower adverse events and a better evolution of HRQL, and significantly demand more consultations with specialist nurses and less to A&E, primary care or specialists, resulting in important savings for the health system. Consequently, specializing or hiring nurses to provide indirect education to stoma patients is cost-effective and highly beneficial for patients. This type of indirect education strategy might be considered for specific conditions with low incidence or difficulties in identifying target patients or delivering information directly to them.

Development and initial validation of the Self-Efficacy for Skin Self-Examination Scale in a Canadian sample of patients with melanoma

PURPOSE

Melanoma is the deadliest type of skin cancer, although survival rates are high if detected early. Skin self-examination (SSE) is a health behaviour that can lead to early detection of melanoma and more positive health outcomes. Self-efficacy for SSE is a potential predictor of engaging in skin self-exams. However, no standardized measures of self-efficacy for SSE are currently available. The present study reports on the development and initial validation of a measure assessing self-efficacy for SSE.

METHOD

Based on a literature review, including previous studies assessing this construct, the research team developed 9 items capturing confidence in one's ability to conduct SSE. Items were subsequently revised by the research team and two dermatologists, resulting in the elimination of 4 items and modifications to the response options. The final 5-item Self-Efficacy for SSE scale was administered to a sample of 242 melanoma patients recruited from local hospitals. We assessed the scale's factor structure through exploratory factor analysis and the internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha. Scale scores were correlated with intentions to perform SSE, physician support for SSE, skin cancer-specific distress, general distress, and sociodemographic variables to assess convergent and divergent validity.

RESULTS

The scale was found to be unifactorial with adequate model fit, have acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.74), and initial evidence of convergent and divergent validity, as indicated by the scale correlating with physicians' support for SSE (r = 0.30, p < 0.01), intention to perform SSE (r_s = 0.21, p < 0.01) and a weak correlation with general distress (r = 0.15, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pending future research corroborating these findings, this measure has potential for use by nurses and other health professionals in follow-up care to identify individuals at risk for low self-efficacy for SSE requiring more targeted educational SSE interventions.