1
|
Rodriguez NJ, Furniss CS, Yurgelun MB, Ukaegbu C, Constantinou PE, Fortes I, Caruso A, Schwartz AN, Stopfer JE, Underhill-Blazey M, Kenner B, Nelson SH, Okumura S, Zhou AY, Coffin TB, Uno H, Horiguchi M, Ocean AJ, McAllister F, Lowy AM, Klein AP, Madlensky L, Petersen GM, Garber JE, Lippman SM, Goggins MG, Maitra A, Syngal S. A Randomized Trial of Two Remote Health Care Delivery Models on the Uptake of Genetic Testing and Impact on Patient-Reported Psychological Outcomes in Families With Pancreatic Cancer: The Genetic Education, Risk Assessment, and Testing (GENERATE) Study. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:872-885.e2. [PMID: 38320723 PMCID: PMC11034726 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Genetic testing uptake for cancer susceptibility in family members of patients with cancer is suboptimal. Among relatives of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), The GENetic Education, Risk Assessment, and TEsting (GENERATE) study evaluated 2 online genetic education/testing delivery models and their impact on patient-reported psychological outcomes. METHODS Eligible participants had ≥1 first-degree relative with PDAC, or ≥1 first-/second-degree relative with PDAC with a known pathogenic germline variant in 1 of 13 PDAC predisposition genes. Participants were randomized by family, between May 8, 2019, and June 1, 2021. Arm 1 participants underwent a remote interactive telemedicine session and online genetic education. Arm 2 participants were offered online genetic education only. All participants were offered germline testing. The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake, compared by permutation tests and mixed-effects logistic regression models. We hypothesized that Arm 1 participants would have a higher genetic testing uptake than Arm 2. Validated surveys were administered to assess patient-reported anxiety, depression, and cancer worry at baseline and 3 months postintervention. RESULTS A total of 424 families were randomized, including 601 participants (n = 296 Arm 1; n = 305 Arm 2), 90% of whom completed genetic testing (Arm 1 [87%]; Arm 2 [93%], P = .014). Arm 1 participants were significantly less likely to complete genetic testing compared with Arm 2 participants (adjusted ratio [Arm1/Arm2] 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.98). Among participants who completed patient-reported psychological outcomes questionnaires (Arm 1 [n = 194]; Arm 2 [n = 206]), the intervention did not affect mean anxiety, depression, or cancer worry scores. CONCLUSIONS Remote genetic education and testing can be a successful and complementary option for delivering genetics care. (Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT03762590).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette J Rodriguez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - C Sloane Furniss
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chinedu Ukaegbu
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela E Constantinou
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott H Nelson
- Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Volunteer, Patient Advocate, and Pancreatic Cancer Survivor
| | | | | | - Tara B Coffin
- WIRB-Copernicus Group Institutional Review Board, Puyallup, Washington
| | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Miki Horiguchi
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Florencia McAllister
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew M Lowy
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Alison P Klein
- Johns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa Madlensky
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Judy E Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Michael G Goggins
- Johns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Henderson TO, Allen MA, Mim R, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Elkin E, Oeffinger K, Krull K, Ofidis D, Mcleod B, Griffin H, Wood E, Cacioppo C, Weinberg M, Brown S, Howe S, McDonald A, Vukadinovich C, Alston S, Rinehart D, Armstrong GT, Bradbury AR. The ENGAGE study: a 3-arm randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation study of an in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic services in childhood cancer survivors. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:253. [PMID: 38414045 PMCID: PMC10900774 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10586-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Germline cancer genetic testing has become a standard evidence-based practice, with established risk reduction and screening guidelines for genetic carriers. Access to genetic services is limited in many places, which leaves many genetic carriers unidentified and at risk for late diagnosis of cancers and poor outcomes. This poses a problem for childhood cancer survivors, as this is a population with an increased risk for subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMN) due to cancer therapy or inherited cancer predisposition. The ENGaging and Activating cancer survivors in Genetic services (ENGAGE) study evaluates the effectiveness of an in-home, collaborative PCP model of remote telegenetic services to increase uptake of cancer genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors compared to usual care options for genetic testing. METHODS The ENGAGE study is a 3-arm randomized hybrid type 1 effectiveness and implementation study within the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study population which tests a clinical intervention while gathering information on its delivery during the effectiveness trial and its potential for future implementation among 360 participants. Participants are randomized into three arms. Those randomized to Arm A receive genetic services via videoconferencing, those in Arm B receive these services by phone, and those randomized to Arm C will receive usual care services. DISCUSSION With many barriers to accessing genetic services, innovative delivery models are needed to address this gap and increase uptake of genetic services. The ENGAGE study evaluates the effectiveness of an adapted model of remote delivery of genetic services to increase the uptake of recommended genetic testing in childhood cancer survivors. This study assesses the uptake in remote genetic services and identify barriers to uptake to inform future recommendations and a theoretically-informed process evaluation which can inform modifications to enhance dissemination beyond this study population and to realize the benefits of precision medicine. TRIAL REGISTRATION This protocol was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04455698) on July 2, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara O Henderson
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Mary Ashley Allen
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rajia Mim
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin Krull
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Demetrios Ofidis
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Briana Mcleod
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hannah Griffin
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Wood
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Cara Cacioppo
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michelle Weinberg
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Brown
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah Howe
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Aaron McDonald
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Chris Vukadinovich
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Shani Alston
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Dayton Rinehart
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Angela R Bradbury
- Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Hematology-Oncology, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rana HQ, Stopfer JE, Weitz M, Kipnis L, Koeller DR, Culver S, Mercado J, Gelman RS, Underhill-Blazey M, McGregor BA, Sweeney CJ, Petrucelli N, Kokenakes C, Pirzadeh-Miller S, Reys B, Frazier A, Knechtl A, Fateh S, Vatnick DR, Silver R, Kilbridge KE, Pomerantz MM, Wei XX, Choudhury AD, Sonpavde GP, Kozyreva O, Lathan C, Horton C, Dolinsky JS, Heath EI, Ross TS, Courtney KD, Garber JE, Taplin ME. Pretest Video Education Versus Genetic Counseling for Patients With Prostate Cancer: ProGen, A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. JCO Oncol Pract 2023; 19:1069-1079. [PMID: 37733980 PMCID: PMC10667014 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline genetic testing (GT) is recommended for men with prostate cancer (PC), but testing through traditional models is limited. The ProGen study examined a novel model aimed at providing access to GT while promoting education and informed consent. METHODS Men with potentially lethal PC (metastatic, localized with a Gleason score of ≥8, persistent prostate-specific antigen after local therapy), diagnosis age ≤55 years, previous malignancy, and family history suggestive of a pathogenic variant (PV) and/or at oncologist's discretion were randomly assigned 3:1 to video education (VE) or in-person genetic counseling (GC). Participants had 67 genes analyzed (Ambry), with results disclosed via telephone by a genetic counselor. Outcomes included GT consent, GT completion, PV prevalence, and survey measures of satisfaction, psychological impact, genetics knowledge, and family communication. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used for between-arm comparisons. RESULTS Over a 2-year period, 662 participants at three sites were randomly assigned and pretest VE (n = 498) or GC (n = 164) was completed by 604 participants (VE, 93.1%; GC, 88.8%), of whom 596 participants (VE, 98.9%; GC, 97.9%) consented to GT and 591 participants completed GT (VE, 99.3%; GC, 98.6%). These differences were not statistically significant although subtle differences in satisfaction and psychological impact were. Notably, 84 PVs were identified in 78 participants (13.2%), with BRCA1/2 PV comprising 32% of participants with a positive result (BRCA2 n = 21, BRCA1 n = 4). CONCLUSION Both VE and traditional GC yielded high GT uptake without significant differences in outcome measures of completion, GT uptake, genetics knowledge, and family communication. The increased demand for GT with limited genetics resources supports consideration of pretest VE for patients with PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huma Q. Rana
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Jill E. Stopfer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Michelle Weitz
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lindsay Kipnis
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Diane R. Koeller
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Samantha Culver
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Joanna Mercado
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Meghan Underhill-Blazey
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Bradley A. McGregor
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Christopher J. Sweeney
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | - Brian Reys
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Arthur Frazier
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | - Andrew Knechtl
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | - Salman Fateh
- Karmanos Cancer Institute at McLaren Clarkston, Clarkston, MI
| | | | - Rebecca Silver
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kerry E. Kilbridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mark M. Pomerantz
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Xiao X. Wei
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Atish D. Choudhury
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Guru P. Sonpavde
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Olga Kozyreva
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Judy E. Garber
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sweet K, Reiter PL, Schnell PM, Senter L, Shane-Carson KP, Aeilts A, Cooper J, Spears C, Brown J, Toland AE, Agnese DM, Katz ML. Genetic counseling and testing for females at elevated risk for breast cancer: Protocol for the randomized controlled trial of the Know Your Risk intervention. Contemp Clin Trials 2023; 133:107323. [PMID: 37661005 PMCID: PMC10591709 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genetic counseling and testing have an important role in the care of patients at elevated risk for breast cancer. However, conventional pre- and post-test genetic counseling is labor and time intensive, less accessible for patients living outside major urban centers, and impractical on a large scale. A patient-driven approach to genetic counseling and testing may increase access, improve patients' experiences, affect efficiency of clinical practice, and help meet workforce demand. The objective of this 2-arm randomized controlled trial is to determine the efficacy of Know Your Risk (KYR), a genetic counseling patient preference intervention. METHODS Females (n = 1000) at elevated risk (>20% lifetime) for breast cancer will be randomized to the KYR intervention or conventional genetic counseling. The study will provide comprehensive assessment of breast cancer risk by multigene panel testing and validated polygenic risk score. Primary outcome is adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for a clinical encounter every 6-12 months and an annual mammogram (breast MRI if recommended) determined by medical record review. Secondary outcomes include adherence to other recommended cancer screening tests determined by medical record review and changes in breast cancer knowledge, perception of risk, post-test/counseling distress, and satisfaction with counseling by completion of three surveys during the study. Study aims will be evaluated for non-inferiority of the KYR intervention compared to conventional genetic counseling. CONCLUSION If efficacious, the KYR intervention has the potential to improve patients' experience and may change how genetic counseling is delivered, inform best practices, and reduce workforce burden. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.govNCT05325151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Sweet
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Paul L Reiter
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Patrick M Schnell
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Leigha Senter
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kate P Shane-Carson
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amber Aeilts
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Julia Cooper
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Christina Spears
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Brown
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Bioethics, Department of Biomedical Education and Anatomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Amanda E Toland
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Doreen M Agnese
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mira L Katz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al Shanbari N, Alharthi A, Bakry SM, Alzahrani M, Alhijjy MM, Mirza HA, Almutairi M, Ekram SN. Knowledge of Cancer Genetics and the Importance of Genetic Testing: A Public Health Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e43016. [PMID: 37674959 PMCID: PMC10479723 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cancer represents a global concern as the second-leading cause of mortality worldwide. It is defined as a genetic disease that develops as a result of several genetic abnormalities and changes to specific genes. Thus, early preventive measures and clinical interventions can be implemented with impressive results using genetic testing and screening for hereditary susceptibility. Objectives The present study assessed the knowledge of cancer genetics and of the importance of genetic testing among the general population in Saudi Arabia's Makkah Province. Methods A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among the general population in Makkah Province. The data were collected through an online questionnaire from November 2022 through December 2022. Results The study recruited 1,329 participants, the largest group of whom were 21-30 years old (n=524, 39.4%). About 60.1% of the respondents were female. The findings reveal that 52.52% of the respondents had poor knowledge, while only 4.82% exhibited good knowledge. Conclusion Approximately half the total participants possessed an inadequate understanding of cancer genetics and the importance of genetic testing. This indicates the need for awareness campaigns and programs to improve the general population's understanding of the genetic predisposition to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasser Al Shanbari
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Abdulrahman Alharthi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Salah M Bakry
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Muath Alzahrani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Majed M Alhijjy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Hashem A Mirza
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| | - Meshal Almutairi
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Maternity and Children Hospital, Buraidah, SAU
| | - Samar N Ekram
- Department of Medical Genetics, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Mecca, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Furniss CS, Yurgelun MB, Ukaegbu C, Constantinou PE, Lafferty CC, Talcove-Berko ER, Schwartz AN, Stopfer JE, Underhill-Blazey M, Kenner B, Nelson SH, Okumura S, Law S, Zhou AY, Coffin TB, Rodriguez NJ, Uno H, Ocean AJ, McAllister F, Lowy AM, Lippman SM, Klein AP, Madlensky L, Petersen GM, Garber JE, Goggins MG, Maitra A, Syngal S. Novel Models of Genetic Education and Testing for Pancreatic Cancer Interception: Preliminary Results from the GENERATE Study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2021; 14:1021-1032. [PMID: 34625409 PMCID: PMC8563400 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Up to 10% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) carry underlying germline pathogenic variants in cancer susceptibility genes. The GENetic Education Risk Assessment and TEsting (GENERATE) study aimed to evaluate novel methods of genetic education and testing in relatives of patients with PDAC. Eligible individuals had a family history of PDAC and a relative with a germline pathogenic variant in APC, ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, PMS2, STK11, or TP53 genes. Participants were recruited at six academic cancer centers and through social media campaigns and patient advocacy efforts. Enrollment occurred via the study website (https://GENERATEstudy.org) and all participation, including collecting a saliva sample for genetic testing, could be done from home. Participants were randomized to one of two remote methods that delivered genetic education about the risks of inherited PDAC and strategies for surveillance. The primary outcome of the study was uptake of genetic testing. From 5/8/2019 to 5/6/2020, 49 participants were randomized to each of the intervention arms. Overall, 90 of 98 (92%) of randomized participants completed genetic testing. The most frequently detected pathogenic variants included those in BRCA2 (N = 15, 17%), ATM (N = 11, 12%), and CDKN2A (N = 4, 4%). Participation in the study remained steady throughout the onset of the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives to traditional cascade testing, with genetic testing rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for PDAC interception approaches. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: Preliminary data from the GENERATE study indicate success of remote alternatives for pancreatic cancer genetic testing and education, with genetic testing uptake rates over 90% and a high rate of identification of germline pathogenic variant carriers who would be ideal candidates for pancreatic cancer interception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Sloane Furniss
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew B Yurgelun
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Pamela E Constantinou
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Scott H Nelson
- Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Volunteer, Patient Advocate, and Pancreatic Cancer Survivor, St. Anthony, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | | | - Nicolette J Rodriguez
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hajime Uno
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Florencia McAllister
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew M Lowy
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Alison P Klein
- Johns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lisa Madlensky
- Moores Cancer Center, UC San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Judy E Garber
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael G Goggins
- Johns Hopkins University, Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sapna Syngal
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cragun D, Beckstead J, Farmer M, Hooker G, Dean M, Matloff E, Reid S, Tezak A, Weidner A, Whisenant JG, Pal T. IMProving care After inherited Cancer Testing (IMPACT) study: protocol of a randomized trial evaluating the efficacy of two interventions designed to improve cancer risk management and family communication of genetic test results. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1099. [PMID: 34645413 PMCID: PMC8513202 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08822-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementing genetic testing for inherited cancer predisposition into routine clinical care offers a tremendous opportunity for cancer prevention and early detection. However, genetic testing itself does not improve outcomes; rather, outcomes depend on implemented follow-up care. The IMPACT study is a hybrid type I randomized effectiveness-implementation trial to simultaneously evaluate the effectiveness of two interventions for individuals with inherited cancer predisposition focused on: 1) increasing family communication (FC) of genetic test results; and 2) improving engagement with guideline-based cancer risk management (CRM). METHODS This prospective study will recruit a racially, geographically, and socioeconomically diverse population of individuals with a documented pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant in an inherited cancer gene. Eligible participants will be asked to complete an initial trial survey and randomly assigned to one of three arms: A) GeneSHARE, a website designed to increase FC of genetic test results; B) My Gene Counsel's Living Lab Report, a digital tool designed to improve understanding of genetic test results and next steps, including CRM guidelines; or C) a control arm in which participants continue receiving standard care. Follow-up surveys will be conducted at 1, 3, and 12 months following randomization. These surveys include single-item measures, scales, and indices related to: 1) FC and CRM behaviors and behavioral factors following the COM-B theoretical framework (i.e., capability, opportunity, and motivation); 2) implementation outcomes (i.e., acceptability, appropriateness, exposure, and reach); and 3) other contextual factors (i.e., sociodemographic and clinical factors, and uncertainty, distress, and positive aspects of genetic test results). The primary outcomes are an increase in FC of genetic test results (Arm A) and improved engagement with guideline-based CRM without overtreatment or undertreatment (Arm B) by the 12-month follow-up survey. DISCUSSION Our interventions are designed to shift the paradigm by which individuals with P/LP variants in inherited cancer genes are provided with information to enhance FC of genetic test results and engagement with guideline-based CRM. The information gathered through evaluating the effectiveness and implementation of these real-world approaches is needed to modify and scale up adaptive, stepped interventions that have the potential to maximize FC and CRM. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04763915, date registered: February 21, 2021). PROTOCOL VERSION September 17th, 2021 Amendment Number 04.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, IDRB 304, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Jason Beckstead
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, 13201 Bruce B Downs Boulevard, IDRB 304, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Meagan Farmer
- My Gene Counsel, PO Box 612, Branford, CT, 06405, USA
| | - Gillian Hooker
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Marleah Dean
- Department of Communication, University of South Florida, 4202 East Fowler Avenue, CIS 3043, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA
- Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 USF Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Ellen Matloff
- My Gene Counsel, PO Box 612, Branford, CT, 06405, USA
| | - Sonya Reid
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Ann Tezak
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Anne Weidner
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Jennifer G Whisenant
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA
| | - Tuya Pal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1500 21st Avenue South, Suite 2810, Nashville, TN, 37212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Patient-Reported Outcomes following Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome, and Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11090850. [PMID: 34575627 PMCID: PMC8467628 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and PRO measures (PROMs) are real-world evidence that can help capture patient experiences and perspectives regarding a clinical intervention such as genetic testing. Objective: To identify and capture methods and qualitative PRO themes among studies reporting PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Methods: A systematic review was conducted via PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Yale University’s TRIP Medical Databases on articles published by April 2021. Results: We identified 24 studies published between 1996 and 2021 representing 4279 participants that reported PROs following genetic testing for FH, breast and ovarian cancer syndrome, and Lynch syndrome. Studies collected and reported PROs from validated PROM instruments (n = 12; 50%), validated surveys (n = 7; 26%), and interviews (n = 10; 42%). PRO themes ranged across all collection methods (e.g., psychological, knowledge, coping and satisfaction, concern about stigma/discrimination, etc.). Conclusions: Important gaps identified include (1) most studies (n = 18; 75%) reported PROs following genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer, and (2) populations reporting PROs overall were largely of White/Caucasian/Northern European/Anglo-Saxon descent. We offer recommendations and describe real-world implications for the field moving forward.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaphingst KA, Kohlmann W, Chambers RL, Goodman MS, Bradshaw R, Chan PA, Chavez-Yenter D, Colonna SV, Espinel WF, Everett JN, Gammon A, Goldberg ER, Gonzalez J, Hagerty KJ, Hess R, Kehoe K, Kessler C, Kimball KE, Loomis S, Martinez TR, Monahan R, Schiffman JD, Temares D, Tobik K, Wetter DW, Mann DM, Kawamoto K, Del Fiol G, Buys SS, Ginsburg O. Comparing models of delivery for cancer genetics services among patients receiving primary care who meet criteria for genetic evaluation in two healthcare systems: BRIDGE randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:542. [PMID: 34078380 PMCID: PMC8170651 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06489-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in genetics and sequencing technologies are enabling the identification of more individuals with inherited cancer susceptibility who could benefit from tailored screening and prevention recommendations. While cancer family history information is used in primary care settings to identify unaffected patients who could benefit from a cancer genetics evaluation, this information is underutilized. System-level population health management strategies are needed to assist health care systems in identifying patients who may benefit from genetic services. In addition, because of the limited number of trained genetics specialists and increasing patient volume, the development of innovative and sustainable approaches to delivering cancer genetic services is essential. METHODS We are conducting a randomized controlled trial, entitled Broadening the Reach, Impact, and Delivery of Genetic Services (BRIDGE), to address these needs. The trial is comparing uptake of genetic counseling, uptake of genetic testing, and patient adherence to management recommendations for automated, patient-directed versus enhanced standard of care cancer genetics services delivery models. An algorithm-based system that utilizes structured cancer family history data available in the electronic health record (EHR) is used to identify unaffected patients who receive primary care at the study sites and meet current guidelines for cancer genetic testing. We are enrolling eligible patients at two healthcare systems (University of Utah Health and New York University Langone Health) through outreach to a randomly selected sample of 2780 eligible patients in the two sites, with 1:1 randomization to the genetic services delivery arms within sites. Study outcomes are assessed through genetics clinic records, EHR, and two follow-up questionnaires at 4 weeks and 12 months after last genetic counseling contactpre-test genetic counseling. DISCUSSION BRIDGE is being conducted in two healthcare systems with different clinical structures and patient populations. Innovative aspects of the trial include a randomized comparison of a chatbot-based genetic services delivery model to standard of care, as well as identification of at-risk individuals through a sustainable EHR-based system. The findings from the BRIDGE trial will advance the state of the science in identification of unaffected patients with inherited cancer susceptibility and delivery of genetic services to those patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION BRIDGE is registered as NCT03985852 . The trial was registered on June 6, 2019 at clinicaltrials.gov .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly A Kaphingst
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
| | - Wendy Kohlmann
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | | | - Melody S Goodman
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, 726 Broadway, New York, NY, 10012, USA
| | - Richard Bradshaw
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Priscilla A Chan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Daniel Chavez-Yenter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Communication, University of Utah, 255 S. Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Sarah V Colonna
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Veterans Administration Medical Center, 500 S. Foothill Boulevard, Salt Lake City, UT, 84149, USA
| | - Whitney F Espinel
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Jessica N Everett
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Amanda Gammon
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Eric R Goldberg
- Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Javier Gonzalez
- Medical Center Information Technology, NYU Langone Health, 360 Park Avenue South, New York, NY, 10010, USA
| | - Kelsi J Hagerty
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Rachel Hess
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Kelsey Kehoe
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Cecilia Kessler
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Kadyn E Kimball
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - Shane Loomis
- NYU Langone Health, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Boost Services, Epic Systems Corporation, 1979 Milky Way, Verona, WI, 53593, USA
| | - Tiffany R Martinez
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Rachel Monahan
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Joshua D Schiffman
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Dani Temares
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Katie Tobik
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Devin M Mann
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Kensaku Kawamoto
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Guilherme Del Fiol
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA
| | - Saundra S Buys
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, 2000 Circle of Hope Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, 160 E. 34th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
- Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, 550 First Avenue, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Genomic medicine implementation protocols in the PhenX Toolkit: tools for standardized data collection. Genet Med 2021; 23:1783-1788. [PMID: 33972721 PMCID: PMC8108409 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01183-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The PhenX Toolkit ( www.phenxtoolkit.org ), an online catalog of recommended measurement protocols, facilitates cross-study analyses for research with human participants. The PhenX Steering Committee recommended genomic medicine implementation as a new research domain, with the following scope: genomic knowledge and education (both patients and providers); implementation science; changes in management and treatment; return of results; patient outcomes; and ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) associated with genomic research. METHODS A seven-member expert Working Group convened in October 2019 to identify well-established measurement protocols for a new genomic medicine implementation domain and used the established PhenX consensus process to select measurement protocols for inclusion in the PhenX Toolkit. RESULTS The Working Group recommended 15 measurement protocols for inclusion in the PhenX Toolkit, with priority given to those with empirical evidence supporting validity. Consortia funded by the National Institutes of Health, and particularly the National Human Genome Research Institute, proved critical in identifying protocols with established utility in this research domain, and identified protocols that were developed through a rigorous process for scope elements that lacked formally validated protocols. CONCLUSION Use of these protocols, which were released in September 2020, can facilitate standard data collection for genomic medicine implementation research.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pozzar RA, Hong F, Xiong N, Stopfer JE, Nayak MM, Underhill-Blazey M. Knowledge and psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing among individuals with ovarian cancer. Fam Cancer 2021; 21:35-47. [PMID: 33751319 DOI: 10.1007/s10689-021-00240-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In a sample of individuals with ovarian cancer, we aimed to (a) identify factors associated with the psychosocial impact of genetic counseling and multigene panel testing, (b) identify factors associated with cancer genetics knowledge, and (c) summarize patient-reported recommendations to improve the genetic counseling and multigene panel testing process. Eligible participants in this secondary analysis of quantitative and qualitative survey data were English-speaking adults with ovarian cancer. Psychosocial impact was assessed using the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire. Knowledge of cancer genetics was assessed using the KnowGene scale. Significant predictors of MICRA and KnowGene scores were identified using multiple regression. Open-ended survey item responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Eighty-seven participants met eligibility criteria. A positive genetic test result was associated with greater adverse psychosocial impact (B = 1.13, p = 0.002). Older age (B = - 0.07, p = 0.044) and being a member of a minority racial or ethnic group (B = - 3.075, p = 0.033) were associated with lower knowledge, while a personal history of at least one other type of cancer (B = 1.975, p = 0.015) was associated with higher knowledge. In open-ended item responses, participants wanted clinicians to assist with family communication, improve result disclosure, and enhance patient and family understanding of results. A subset of individuals with ovarian cancer who receive a positive genetic test result may be at risk for adverse psychosocial outcomes. Tailored cancer genetics education is necessary to promote the equitable uptake of targeted ovarian cancer treatment and risk-reducing therapies. Interventions to enhance patient-clinician communication in this setting are a research priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Pozzar
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Niya Xiong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Manan M Nayak
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Meghan Underhill-Blazey
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave., Boston, MA, 02215, USA.,University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Ave., Rochester, NY, 14642, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Watnick D, Odgis JA, Suckiel SA, Gallagher KM, Teitelman N, Donohue KE, Gelb BD, Kenny EE, Wasserstein MP, Horowitz CR, Dolan SM, Bauman LJ. "Is that something that should concern me?": a qualitative exploration of parent understanding of their child's genomic test results. HGG ADVANCES 2021; 2. [PMID: 33884375 PMCID: PMC8057699 DOI: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2021.100027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic counselors are trained to deliver complicated genomic test results to parents of pediatric patients. However, there is limited knowledge on how parents perceive this information and what they understand about the results. This research aims to qualitatively explore parents’ experiences receiving genomic test results for their children. As part of formative research for the NYCKidSeq Study, we recruited a purposive sample of parents of 22 children stratified by child race/ethnicity and test result classification (positive, uncertain, or negative) and conducted in-depth interviews using a semi-structured guide. Analysis was conducted using grounded theory’s constant comparative method across cases and themes. Parents described different elements of understanding: genetics knowledge; significance and meaning of positive, uncertain, or negative results; and implications for the health of their child and family. Parents reported challenges understanding technical details and significance of their child’s results but gladly allowed their providers to be custodians of this information. However, of the different elements of understanding described, parents cared most deeply about being able to understand implications for their child’s and family’s health. These findings suggest that a counseling approach that primarily addresses parents’ desire to understand how to best care for their child and family may be more appropriate than an information-heavy approach focused on technical details. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings in larger parent cohorts and to explore ways genetic counseling can support parents’ preferences without sacrificing important components of parent understanding and overall satisfaction with their experiences with genomic medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Watnick
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Jacqueline A Odgis
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Sabrina A Suckiel
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Katie M Gallagher
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Nehama Teitelman
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| | - Katherine E Donohue
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Bruce D Gelb
- Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Departments of Pediatrics and Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Eimear E Kenny
- Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | | | - Carol R Horowitz
- Departments of Population Health Science and Policy and Medicine, Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Siobhan M Dolan
- Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Laurie J Bauman
- Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Development and pilot testing of a questionnaire to assess sensory quality control (SQC) knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of food company employees. Food Qual Prefer 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
14
|
Underhill-Blazey M, Blonquist T, Chittenden A, Pozzar R, Nayak M, Lansang K, Hong F, Garber J, Stopfer JE. Informing models of cancer genetics care in the era of multigene panel testing with patient-led recommendations. J Genet Couns 2020; 30:268-282. [PMID: 32851753 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
The study describes patient-reported experiences and recommendations to improve the genetic counseling and multigene panel testing (MGPT) process. A descriptive mixed-method study with concurrently collected and integrated qualitative and quantitative data was conducted. Eligible participants were English-speaking adults with a breast or gynecologic cancer diagnosis who had received genetic counseling and testing with a MGPT from one Comprehensive Cancer Center. Satisfaction with the genetic counseling, genetic knowledge using a recently validated scale (KnowGene), the multidimensional impact of cancer risk assessment (MICRA), family communication, and the association with demographic factors were evaluated. To supplement the large quantitative data set, qualitative focus group responses and open-ended text items were collected. Univariate and multivariable associations between each outcome of interest and personal characteristics were assessed. Qualitative data were content-analyzed. 603 participants completed the survey (48% response rate) and 10 individuals participated in the focus groups. Participants were mostly Caucasian, educated with a college degree or more, and female with median age 58 (24-91), and 78% of participants had a breast cancer diagnosis. Of all individuals undergoing genetic testing using a MGPT, 13% had a pathogenic variant identified, and 30% had a variant of uncertain significance (VUS). Overall, participants reported satisfaction with the genetic counseling and testing process (mean 36.9 [SD 4.7]). On average, participants had 7 incorrect answers out of 19 on the genetic knowledge scale (mean 12.3 [SD 3.4]). MICRA scores showed overall low levels of distress and uncertainty, as well as positive experiences, with wide variability (median 17 [0-84]). Age, marital status, education level, type of cancer diagnosis, and genetic testing results were significantly associated with outcomes. Most participants communicated genetic testing results to mainly female first-degree relatives. A wide range of individual preferences affecting overall satisfaction, or suggestions for improvement were shared. As new models of streamlined cancer genetic services are being clinically implemented, approaches should continue to assess and tailor the process based on patients' informational and emotional needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan Underhill-Blazey
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Traci Blonquist
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anu Chittenden
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Pozzar
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Manan Nayak
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristina Lansang
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Judy Garber
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jill E Stopfer
- Cancer Genetics and Prevention Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Cragun D, Weidner A, Tezak A, Zuniga B, Wiesner GL, Pal T. A Web-Based Tool to Automate Portions of Pretest Genetic Counseling for Inherited Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:841-847. [PMID: 32634774 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing demand for genetic testing for inherited cancer risk coupled with a shortage of providers trained in genetics highlight the potential for automated tools embedded in the clinic process to meet this demand. We developed and tested a scalable, easy-to-use, 12-minute web-based educational tool that included standard pretest genetic counseling elements related to panel-based testing for multiple genes associated with cancer risk. METHODS The tool was viewed by new patients at the Vanderbilt Hereditary Cancer Clinic before meeting with a board-certified genetics professional. Pre- and post-tool surveys measured knowledge, feeling informed/empowered to decide about testing, attitudinal values about genetic testing, and health literacy. Of the initial 100 participants, 50 were randomized to only have knowledge measured on the post-tool survey to assess for a priming effect. RESULTS Of 360 patients approached, 305 consented and completed both the pre- and post-tool surveys, with a mean age of 47 years, including 80% female patients and 48% patients with cancer. Survey results showed an increase in knowledge and feeling informed/empowered after viewing the tool (P<.001), but no significant change in attitude (P=.64). Post-tool survey data indicated no difference in median knowledge between low and high health literacy groups (P=.30). No priming effect was present among the initial 100 participants (P=.675). CONCLUSIONS Viewing the educational tool resulted in significant gains in knowledge across health literacy levels, and most individuals felt informed and empowered to decide about genetic testing. These findings indicate that the use of an automated pretest genetic counseling tool may help streamline the delivery of genetic services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Cragun
- 1College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; and
| | - Anne Weidner
- 2Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and
| | - Ann Tezak
- 2Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and
| | - Brenda Zuniga
- 2Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and
| | - Georgia L Wiesner
- 2Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and.,3Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Tuya Pal
- 2Division of Genetic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, and.,3Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|