Tailoring nutrition and cancer education materials for breast cancer patients

Assessing the Role of Perioperative Nutritional Education in Improving Oral Intake after Oesophagectomy: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine whether nutritional education, from the preoperative to postoperative period, and nutritional management designed to improve nutritional status alone, could improve patients' health-related self-management and nutritional management skills during the postoperative period.

METHODS

We evaluated 101 hospitalised patients with oesophageal cancer who underwent surgery between 2015 and 2016 and received perioperative nutritional education (PERIO-N). The control group included 52 patients who underwent surgery between 2014 and 2015 and were supported only by normal interventions according to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol. The PERIO-N group paid specific attention to nutrition risk screening, nutrition assessment, nutrition monitoring, and lifestyle education.

RESULTS

The patients in the PERIO-N group were 1.8 times more likely to be able to consume food orally than the control group (p=0.010). In the PERIO-N group, 50.5% of the patients could orally consume food, 42.6% received a combination of oral and enteral nutrition, and 6.9% only underwent enteral nutrition. In comparison, in the control group, 28.8% of the patients could orally consume food, 53.8% received a combination of oral and enteral nutrition, and 17.3% were only administered enteral nutrition (p=0.004). In addition, patients in the PERIO-N group were discharged at a 1.5 times higher rate than those in the control group (p=0.027). The readmission rate for malnutrition within 3 months was 4% in the PERIO group (5.4% for home discharge only) and 5.8% in the control group (10.5% for home discharge only) (p=0.61).

CONCLUSION

This study found that perioperative nutrition education in patients who underwent oesophageal cancer surgery led to increase in the amount of oral intake at discharge. Moreover, the group that received nutrition education did not have an increased probability of hospitalisation due to the risk of malnutrition within 3 months after discharge.

Effectiveness of mHealth diet interventions in cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To evaluate the effects of mobile health (mHealth) diet interventions on cancer survivors' diet intake, weight change, waist circumference, hip circumference, and quality of life (QoL).

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ProQuest, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and SinoMed databases were searched from their inception to September 25, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of mHealth diet interventions in cancer survivors were identified. Two researchers independently selected the included studies and appraised their quality. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs (RoB2).

Results

A total of 15 RCTs involving 2363 cancer survivors were included. MHealth diet interventions significantly improved fruit and vegetable intake (standardized mean difference [SMD] ​= ​0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.05, 0.33], P ​< ​0.01), and QoL (SMD ​= ​0.13, 95% CI [0.01, 0.26], P ​= ​0.04) and reduced fat intake (SMD ​= ​-0.22, 95% CI [-0.34, -0.11], P ​< ​0.01), weight (SMD ​= ​-0.35, 95% CI [-0.48, -0.22], P ​< ​0.01), waist circumference (MD ​= ​-1.43, 95% CI [-2.33, -0.53], P ​< ​0.01), and hip circumference (MD ​= ​-3.54, 95% CI [-4.88, -2.19], P < 0.01) in cancer survivors. No significant differences were observed in energy intake (P ​= ​0.46) or whole grain intake (P ​= ​0.14).

Conclusions

MHealth diet interventions may be an effective strategy for cancer survivors. Large-scale RCTs with rigorous study designs are needed to examine the effect of diet intervention delivered via mHealth.

Nutrition and behavior change: a review of recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current article will highlight recent trends and novel approaches to behavior change strategies in nutrition. Physicians, nurses, and other healthcare professionals play key roles in counseling patients on lifestyle change, which is critical for patients with chronic conditions. Nutrition science continues to advance, and new approaches to behavior change are needed for successful implementation at the individual and population level.

RECENT FINDINGS

The solutions to obstacles around healthful eating patterns are varied, population-dependent, and require a multipronged approach. One area of focus is the language around behavior change, ensuring it is clear and emphasizes its multifactorial nature. For young adults, the careful use of video games and social media may be essential. For older adults, altering food consistency and ensuring proper nutrient intake are crucial factors. Vulnerable populations remain susceptible to malnutrition and need special attention. Despite significant advances in managing and treating diseases, there are still gaps in nutrition counseling and behavior change efforts.

SUMMARY

Every age and stage of life needs a focus on healthful foods, and nutrition counseling at each stage has its unique nuances. Careful attention to the language of change and the phrasing used in counseling is vital for educating, connecting with, and empowering patients to change. Changing healthcare operations and provider behavior around nutrition counseling is a part of the solution to the worldwide problem of unhealthy eating patterns and practices.