A systematic review of the health literacy of adults with lifelong communication disability: Looking beyond accessing and understanding information

Health literacy in adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy: a mixed methods systematic review

PURPOSE

To identify evidence of health literacy in young people with cerebral palsy (13-38 years), describe current strategies they use to access and build their health knowledge, and explore associations between health literacy and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Four electronic databases were systematically searched (2001 to June 2023) to identify studies describing components of health literacy in this population. Two reviewers screened for eligibility, then extracted data and assessed methodological quality of included studies. Data were synthesised using a convergent integrated analysis framework and summarised with a narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included (N = 363). Evidence of health literacy was demonstrated through a range of strategies young people employed to identify their specific information needs, develop health literacy skills, and learn experientially. The preferred method for building health knowledge was obtaining information from trusted sources. Information gaps were identified in topics such as ageing with cerebral palsy, sexuality and navigating intimate relationships. There were minimal data on health literacy and QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Young people with cerebral palsy want tailored and credible health information to increase participation in making informed health-related decisions. Building capacity and development of self-efficacy may assist with the identification of emerging health literacy needs.

A mixed-method systematic literature review of health literacy interventions for people with disabilities

AIMS

To identify the components and characteristics of health literacy interventions for people with disabilities and to explore the outcomes in terms of health literacy competencies.

DESIGN

A mixed-method systematic literature review.

REVIEW METHODS

The search results were reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. The quality appraisal was guided by the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The contents of each intervention were mapped to the health literacy intervention model and the outcomes were annotated using the integrated model of health literacy.

DATA SOURCES

The literature search was conducted using several electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane library and PsycINFO in December 2022.

RESULTS

Ten studies were selected for this systematic literature review. Seven studies were quantitative, two were qualitative and one was a mixed-methods study. The four components of the health literacy interventions included empowering individuals with low-health literacy (n = 10), strengthening individuals' social support system (n = 3), improving communication with health professionals (n = 1) and reducing barriers to access health systems (n = 3). No intervention addressed improving health professionals' health literacy competencies. Health literacy competencies identified as outcomes in the studies included access (n = 1), understand (n = 7), appraise (n = 1) and apply (n = 9) the health information.

CONCLUSIONS

The significant findings of this systematic literature review provide baseline data and evidence for developing health literacy interventions for people with disabilities. However, this review demonstrates that only a handful of intervention studies have addressed the low-health literacy of people with disabilities. Further and more rigorous interventions addressing health literacy for people with diverse disabilities are warranted.

IMPACT

This review provides insights into how health literacy interventions can be tailored to the type of disability. Further, efforts should be expanded to comprehensively promote all the four core competencies of health literacy to reduce health disparities for individuals living with disabilities.

NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Systematic literature review.