1
|
Kim BH, Krick J, Schneider S, Montes A, Anani UE, Murray PD, Arnolds M, Feltman DM. How do Clinicians View the Process of Shared Decision-Making with Parents Facing Extremely Early Deliveries? Results from an Online Survey. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:713-721. [PMID: 35016247 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to better understand how neonatology (Neo) and maternal-fetal medicine (MFM) physicians approach the process of shared decision-making (SDM) with parents facing extremely premature (<25 weeks estimated gestational age) delivery during antenatal counseling. STUDY DESIGN Attending physicians at U.S. centers with both Neo and MFM fellowships were invited to answer an original online survey about antenatal counseling for extremely early newborns. Preferences for conveying information are reported elsewhere. Here, we report clinicians' self-assessments of their ability to engage in deliberations and decision-making and perceptions of what is important to parents in the SDM process. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed respondents' views with respect to individual characteristics, such as specialty, gender, and years of clinical experience. RESULTS In total, 74 MFMs and 167 Neos representing 94% of the 81 centers surveyed responded. Neos versus MFMs reported repeat visits with parents less often (<0.001) and agreed that parents were more likely to have made delivery room decisions before they counseled them less often (p < 0.001). Respondents reported regularly achieving most goals of SDM, with the exception of providing spiritual support. Most respondents reported that spiritual and religious views, risk to an infant's survival, and the infant's quality of life were important to parental decision-making, while a physician's own personal choice and family political views were reported as less important. While many barriers to SDM exist, respondents rated language barriers and family views that differ from those of a provider as the most difficult barriers to overcome. CONCLUSION This study provides insights into how consultants from different specialties and demographic groups facilitate SDM, thereby informing future efforts for improving counseling and engaging in SDM with parents facing extremely early deliveries and supporting evidence-based training for these complex communication skills. KEY POINTS · Perceptions differed by specialty and demographics.. · Parents' spiritual needs were infrequently met.. · Barriers to shared decision-making exist..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brennan Hodgson Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeanne Krick
- Department of Pediatrics, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Simone Schneider
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Andres Montes
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph's/Candler Health System, Savannah, Georgia
| | - Uchenna E Anani
- Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Peter D Murray
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Marin Arnolds
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Dalia M Feltman
- Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klingler C. Five Coffin Nails to Informed Consent: An Autoethnography of Suffering Complications in Breastfeeding. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2024; 34:340-349. [PMID: 38006446 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231214505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
This autoethnography describes an illness episode caused by breastfeeding complications. It focuses on informed consent processes accompanying this illness episode. Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical medical practice and has to be obtained before a medical intervention can legally be implemented. It is therefore not trivial that in practice, informed consent processes often fail to achieve what they are set out to. With this autoethnography, I want to provide a review of how informed consent processes can fail in the context of breastfeeding, but also draw attention to what these situations can mean and feel like for those affected. I provide in-depth descriptions of five scenes from my illness episode each representing a different barrier to informed consent. The scenes were developed based on emotional recall and written to grant access to the emotional dimensions of my experience in the tradition of evocative autoethnography. As part of my story, I engage with various issues like practices of prescribing, communicative requirements in vulnerable situations to ensure understanding, the dual purpose of informed consent in the moral and legal realm, and the moralized breastfeeding discourse. Possible routes for change to abolish or reduce described barriers to informed consent are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corinna Klingler
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Krick JA, Feltman DM, Arnolds M. Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Infants: A Qualitative Systematic Review. J Pediatr 2022; 251:6-16. [PMID: 35940293 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize and describe important elements of decision-making during antenatal consultation for threatened preterm delivery at the margin of gestational viability. STUDY DESIGN Data sources including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL Plus were searched. We included all qualitative literature published on decision-making from 1990 to July 2021. Two authors independently screened and evaluated each study using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist; studies reaching moderate and high quality were included. We developed an extraction tool to collect and categorize data from each qualitative article, then used thematic analysis to analyze and describe the findings. RESULTS Twenty-five articles incorporating the views of 504 providers and 352 parents were included for final review. Thematic analysis revealed 4 main themes describing the experience of health care providers and parents participating in decision-making: factors that influence decision-making, information sharing, building a partnership, and making the decision. Parents and providers were not always in agreement upon which elements were most essential to the process of decision-making. Articles published in languages other than English were excluded. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative literature highlighting key factors which are important during antenatal counseling can inform and guide providers through the process of shared decision-making. Communicating clear, honest, and balanced information; avoiding artificially dichotomized options; and focusing on partnership building with families will help providers use the antenatal consultation to reach personalized decisions for each infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeanne A Krick
- Department of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX.
| | - Dalia M Feltman
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Evanston Hospital, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL; Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Marin Arnolds
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cavolo A. Embrace the Gray: How Tackling the Clinical Complexities of the Gray Zone Will Improve Decision-making. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2022; 22:40-43. [PMID: 36332041 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2123982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
|
5
|
Parish O, Williams D, Odd D, Joseph-Williams N. Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in neonatal medicine: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of parental perceptions. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1101-1114. [PMID: 34503868 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Systematically review parental perceptions of shared decision-making (SDM) in neonatology, identifying barriers and facilitators to implementation. METHODS Electronic database (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Scopus) and follow-up searches were conducted to identify qualitative studies. Data were extracted, thematically analysed and synthesised. RESULTS Searches yielded 2445 papers, of which 25 were included. Thematic analysis identified six key themes. Key barriers included emotional crises experienced in the NICU setting, lack of medical information provided to parents to inform decision-making, inadequate communication of information, poor relationships with caregivers, lack of continuity in care, and perceived power imbalances between HCPs and parents. Key facilitators included clear, honest and compassionate communication of medical information, caring and empathetic caregivers, continuity in care, and tailored approaches that reflected parent's desired level of involvement. CONCLUSION The highly specialised environment, and the emotional crises experienced by parents impact significantly on their perceived capacity to engage in surrogate decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Complex and multi-factorial interventions that address the training needs of HCPs, and the emotional, informational and decision support needs of parents are needed. SDM skills training, improved information delivery, and integrated emotional and decisional support could help parents to become more involved in SDM for their infant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia Parish
- Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
| | - Denitza Williams
- Cardiff Metropolitan University, Cardiff School of Sport and Health Sciences, Cardiff, UK
| | - David Odd
- Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | - Natalie Joseph-Williams
- Cardiff University, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK; PRIME Centre Wales, School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cavolo A, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Naulaers G, Gastmans C. Neonatologists' Resuscitation Decisions at Birth for Extremely Premature Infants. A Belgian Qualitative Study. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:852073. [PMID: 35402353 PMCID: PMC8989134 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.852073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Deciding whether initiating or withholding resuscitation at birth for extremely preterm infants (EPIs) can be difficult due to uncertainty on outcomes. Clinical uncertainty generates ethical uncertainty. Thus, physicians' attitudes and perspectives on resuscitation of EPIs might influence resuscitation decisions. We aimed at understanding how neonatologists make clinical-ethical decisions for EPI resuscitation and how they perceive these decisions. METHODS We performed a qualitative study using a constructivist account of grounded theory. Face-to-face, semi-structured in-depth interviews with neonatologists comprised data collection. For data analysis, we used the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven. RESULTS We interviewed 20 neonatologists working in 10 hospitals in Belgium. Participants' decision-making can be described as consensus-based, gestational age-based, contextualized, progressive, and shared. All participants agreed on the importance of using the consensus expressed in guidelines as a guidance for the decision-making, i.e., consensus-based. Consequently, all 20 participants use GA thresholds indicated in the guidelines, i.e., GA-based. However, they use these thresholds differently in their decisions. Few participants rigidly follow established thresholds. The vast majority reported using additional contextual factors as birthweight or parents' wishes in the decision-making, rather than only the EPIs' GA, i.e., contextualized. All participants agreed on the importance of involving the parents in the decision-making, i.e., shared, and indeed parents' wishes were among the most valued factors considered in the decision-making. However, the extent to which parents were involved in the decision-making depended on the infant's GA. Participants described a gray zone in which parents' were viewed as the main decision-makers due to the high clinical uncertainty. This mean that participants tend to follow parents' request even when they disagree with it. Outside the gray zone, physicians were viewed as the main decision-makers. This mean that, although parents' wishes were still considered, counseling was more directive and the final decision was made by the physician. CONCLUSION Although an EPI's GA remains the main factor guiding neonatologists' resuscitation decisions, other factors are seriously considered in the decision-making process. All neonatologist participants agreed on the importance of involving parents in the decision-making. However, they involve parents differently depending on the EPI's GA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Cavolo
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Gunnar Naulaers
- Pregnancy, Fetus and Newborn, Department of Development and Regeneration, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cavolo A, de Casterlé BD, Naulaers G, Gastmans C. Neonatologists' decision-making for resuscitation and non-resuscitation of extremely preterm infants: ethical principles, challenges, and strategies-a qualitative study. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:129. [PMID: 34563198 PMCID: PMC8467007 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00702-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deciding whether to resuscitate extremely preterm infants (EPIs) is clinically and ethically problematic. The aim of the study was to understand neonatologists’ clinical–ethical decision-making for resuscitation of EPIs. Methods We conducted a qualitative study in Belgium, following a constructivist account of the Grounded Theory. We conducted 20 in-depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews with neonatologists. Data analysis followed the qualitative analysis guide of Leuven. Results The main principles guiding participants’ decision-making were EPIs’ best interest and respect for parents’ autonomy. Participants agreed that justice as resource allocation should not be considered in resuscitation decision-making. The main ethical challenge for participants was dealing with the conflict between EPIs’ best interest and respect for parents’ autonomy. This conflict was most prominent when parents and clinicians disagreed about births within the gray zone (24–25 weeks). Participants’ coping strategies included setting limits on extent of EPI care provided and rigidly following established guidelines. However, these strategies were not always feasible or successful. Although rare, these situations often led to long-lasting moral distress. Conclusions Participants’ clinical–ethical reasoning for resuscitation of EPIs can be mainly characterized as an attempt to balance EPIs’ best interest and respect for parents’ autonomy. This approach could explain why neonatologists considered conflicts between these principles as their main ethical challenge and why lack of resolution increases the risk of moral distress. Therefore, more research is needed to better understand moral distress in EPI resuscitation decisions. Clinical Trial Registration: The study received ethical approval from the ethics committee of UZ/KU Leuven (S62867). Confidentiality of personal information and anonymity was guaranteed in accordance with the General Data Protection Regulation of 25 May 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Cavolo
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | | | - Gunnar Naulaers
- Pregnancy, Fetus and Newborn, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, UZ, Herestraat 49/7003 21, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, KU Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35/3, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Labrie NHM, van Veenendaal NR, Ludolph RA, Ket JCF, van der Schoor SRD, van Kempen AAMW. Effects of parent-provider communication during infant hospitalization in the NICU on parents: A systematic review with meta-synthesis and narrative synthesis. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1526-1552. [PMID: 33994019 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize and analyse the literature on the effects of parent-provider communication during infant hospitalization in the neonatal (intensive) care unit (NICU) on parent-related outcomes. METHODS Systematic review with meta-synthesis and narrative synthesis. Databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched in October/November 2019. Studies reporting, observing, or measuring parent-related effects of parent-provider communication in the NICU were included. Study quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs. Qualitative studies were meta-synthesized using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Quantitative studies were analysed using narrative synthesis. RESULTS 5586 records were identified; 77 were included, reporting on N = 6960 parents, N = 693 providers, and N = 300 NICUs. Analyses revealed five main (positive and negative) effects of parent-provider interaction on parents' (1) coping, (2) knowledge, (3) participation, (4) parenting, and (5) satisfaction. Communication interventions appeared impactful, particularly in reducing parental stress and anxiety. Findings confirm and refine the NICU Communication Framework. CONCLUSIONS Parent-provider communication is a crucial determinant for parental well-being and satisfaction with care, during and following infant hospitalization in the NICU. R. Practice Implications: Providers should particularly consider the impact on parents of their day-to-day interaction - the most occurring form of communication of all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nanon H M Labrie
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole R van Veenendaal
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johannes C F Ket
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wreesmann WJW, Lorié ES, van Veenendaal NR, van Kempen AAMW, Ket JCF, Labrie NHM. The functions of adequate communication in the neonatal care unit: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:1505-1517. [PMID: 33341329 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Revised: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the main functions of parent-provider communication in the neonatal (intensive) care unit (NICU) and determine what adequate communication entails according to both parents and health professionals. METHODS A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research. PubMed, Ebsco/PsycINFO, Wiley/Cochrane Library, Ebsco/CINAHL, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, and Elsevier/Scopus were searched in October-November 2019 for records on interpersonal communication between parents and providers in neonatal care. Title/abstract screening and full-text analysis were conducted by multiple, independent coders. Data from included articles were analyzed using deductive and inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS 43 records were included. Thematic analysis of data resulted in the development of the NICU Communication Framework, including four functions of communication (1. building/maintaining relationships, 2. exchanging information, 3. (sharing) decision-making, 4. enabling parent self-management) and five factors that contribute to adequate communication across these functions (topic, aims, location, route, design) and, thereby, to tailored parent-provider communication. CONCLUSION The NICU Communication Framework fits with the goals of Family Integrated Care to encourage parent participation in infants' care. This framework forms a first step towards the conceptualization of (adequate) communication in NICU settings. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Findings can be used to improve NICU communication in practice, in particular through the mnemonic TAILORED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther S Lorié
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole R van Veenendaal
- Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Nanon H M Labrie
- Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics and Neonatology, OLVG, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Singh JA, Richards JS, Chang E, Toupin-April K, Barton JL. Shared decision-making in gout treatment: a national study of rheumatology provider opinion and practice. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40:693-700. [PMID: 32997317 PMCID: PMC7856219 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05421-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
To assess rheumatologists' views and practices related to shared decision-making (SDM) in gout treatment. We performed a cross-sectional electronic survey of rheumatologists at U.S. Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, assessing views and practices related to SDM in gout. Of the 154 VA rheumatology providers eligible, 90 responded (response rate, 58%). Fifty-eight percent were female, the mean age was 51 years (standard deviation, 9.6), 42% had > 20 years of experience in medical practice. Rheumatologists reported routinely offering a choice to their patients for (1) starting urate-lowering therapy (ULT) for gout vs. doing nothing (70%); (2) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for the treatment of acute flares (67%); and (3) choosing NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or colchicine for anti-inflammatory prophylaxis when starting ULT (51%). Very few rheumatologists offered choice regarding (4) choosing allopurinol vs. febuxostat as the first ULT (16%) and (5) taking daily ULT long-term vs. intermittently (15%). Rheumatologists perceived that a large proportion of patients were often or sometimes unsure of the best choice for these five decisions, 34%, 76%, 76%, 52%, and 54%, respectively. Similar proportions of rheumatologists felt that patients were uninformed about both medication benefits and risks, unclear about the personal importance of the benefits and risks, and unsupported in decision-making. For the five decisions respectively, rheumatologists supported SDM with patients in 76%, 56%, 58%, 27%, and 25%. The majority of VA rheumatologists incorporated SDM in several gout treatment decisions. Rheumatologists also recognized that patients need better support to participate in SDM in gout. Key Points: • Rheumatologists offered shared decision-making to gout patients for 3 key treatment decisions. • Rheumatologists perceived that many patients were unsure of the best choice for these decisions. • Rheumatologists felt that patients were uninformed about medication benefits/risks and unsupported in decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasvinder A Singh
- Medicine Service, Birmingham VA Medical Center, 700 19th St S, AL, 35233, Birmingham, USA.
- Department of Medicine at School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 510 20th Street South, Birmingham, AL, 35294, United States.
- Division of Epidemiology at School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 Second Ave South, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Faculty Office Tower 805B, 510 20th Street S, Birmingham, AL, 35294-0022, USA.
| | | | | | - Karine Toupin-April
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- VA Portland Health Care System, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Communication between neonatologists and parents when prognosis is uncertain. J Perinatol 2020; 40:1412-1422. [PMID: 32382115 DOI: 10.1038/s41372-020-0673-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When an infant's prognosis is uncertain, communication between neonatologists and parents surrounding goals of care and decision-making can be challenging. This qualitative study explored communication between neonatologists and parents to discover qualities which may enhance or impede parent-clinician partnership under such difficult circumstances. STUDY DESIGN Guided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Patient Centered Communication framework, semi-structured individual interviews were conducted and analyzed regarding neonatologist and parent perceptions of their communication. Subjects consisted of nine dyads of neonatologists and English-speaking parents whose infant had an uncertain prognosis. RESULTS Parents were overall satisfied with neonatologists' communications concerning their infant's uncertain trajectory. Nonetheless, both experienced challenges and distress during communication, impeding collaboration and engagement. CONCLUSIONS Families and neonatologists value principles of patient centered communication but report challenges implementing this practice. Incorporating a multidisciplinary approach in settings of prognostic uncertainty to foster patient centered communication, may enhance communication surrounding NICU care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hoefel L, O’Connor AM, Lewis KB, Boland L, Sikora L, Hu J, Stacey D. 20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part 1: A Systematic Review of the Decisional Needs of People Making Health or Social Decisions. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:555-581. [DOI: 10.1177/0272989x20936209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background. The Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) has been used for 20 years to assess and address people’s decisional needs. The evidence regarding ODSF decisional needs has not been synthesized. Objectives. To synthesize evidence from ODSF-based decisional needs studies, identify new decisional needs, and validate current ODSF decisional needs. Methods. A mixed-studies systematic review. Nine electronic databases were searched. Inclusion criteria: studies of people’s decisional needs when making health or social decisions for themselves, a child, or a mentally incapable person, as reported by themselves, families, or practitioners. Two independent authors screened eligibility, extracted data, and quality appraised studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data were analyzed using narrative synthesis. Results. Of 4532 citations, 45 studies from 7 countries were eligible. People’s needs for 101 unique decisions (85 health, 16 social) were reported by 2857 patient decision makers ( n = 36 studies), 92 parent decision makers ( n = 6), 81 family members ( n = 5), and 523 practitioners ( n = 21). Current ODSF decisional needs were reported in 2 to 40 studies. For 6 decisional needs, there were 11 new (manifestations): 1) information (overload, inadequacy regarding others’ experiences with options), 2) difficult decisional roles (practitioner, family involvement, or deliberations), 3) unrealistic expectations (difficulty believing outcome probabilities apply to them), 4) personal needs (religion/spirituality), 5) difficult decision timing (unpredictable), and 6) unreceptive decisional stage (difficulty accepting condition/need for treatment, powerful emotions limiting information processing, lacking motivation to consider delayed/unpredictable decisions). Limitations. Possible publication bias (only peer-reviewed journals included). Possible missed needs (non-ODSF studies, patient decision aid development studies, 3 ODSF needs added in 2006). Conclusion. We validated current decisional needs, identified 11 new manifestations of 6 decisional needs, and recommended ODSF revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Hoefel
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Laura Boland
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Health Studies, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lindsey Sikora
- Health Sciences Library, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jiale Hu
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cavolo A, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Naulaers G, Gastmans C. Ethics of resuscitation for extremely premature infants: a systematic review of argument-based literature. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 47:medethics-2020-106102. [PMID: 32341186 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To present (1) the ethical concepts related to the debate on resuscitation of extremely premature infants (EPIs) as they are described in the ethical literature; and (2) the ethical arguments based on these concepts. DESIGN We conducted a systematic review of the ethical literature. We selected articles based on the following predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria: (1) English language articles (2) presenting fully elaborated ethical arguments (3) on resuscitation (4) of EPIs, that is, infants born before 28 weeks of gestation. ANALYSIS After repeated reading of articles, we developed individual summaries, conceptual schemes and an overall conceptual scheme. Ethical arguments and concepts were identified and analysed. RESULTS Forty articles were included out of 4709 screened. Personhood, best interest, autonomy and justice were concepts grounding the various arguments. Regarding these concepts, included authors agreed that the best interest principle should guide resuscitation decisions, whereas justice seemed the least important concept. The arguments addressed two questions: Should we resuscitate EPIs? Who should decide? Included authors agreed that not all EPIs should be resuscitated but disagreed on what criteria should ground this decision. Overall, included authors agreed that both parents and physicians should contribute to the decision. CONCLUSIONS The included publications suggest that while the best interest is the main concept guiding resuscitation decisions, justice is the least important. The included authors also agree that both parents and physicians should be actively involved in resuscitation decisions for EPIs. However, our results suggest that parents' decision should be over-ridden when in contrast with the EPI's best interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Cavolo
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé
- Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gunnar Naulaers
- Pregnancy, Fetus and Newborn, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Chris Gastmans
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven Biomedical Sciences Group, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tan A, Pelone F, Arnold S, Anderson J, Kennedy G, Goodman J. Support and information needs of parents and carers of preterm babies requiring respiratory support on the neonatal unit: A qualitative systematic review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnn.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
15
|
Tucker Edmonds B, Hoffman SM, Lynch D, Jeffries E, Jenkins K, Wiehe S, Bauer N, Kuppermann M. Creation of a Decision Support Tool for Expectant Parents Facing Threatened Periviable Delivery: Application of a User-Centered Design Approach. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2020; 12:327-337. [PMID: 30488236 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0348-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) is optimal in the context of periviable delivery, where the decision to pursue life-support measures or palliation is both preference sensitive and value laden. We sought to develop a decision support tool (DST) prototype to facilitate SDM by utilizing a user-centered design research approach. METHODS We convened four patient and provider advisory boards with women and their partners who had experienced a surviving or non-surviving periviable delivery, pregnant women who had not experienced a prior preterm birth, and obstetric providers. Each 2-h session involved design research activities to generate ideas and facilitate sharing of values, goals, and attitudes. Participant feedback shaped the design of three prototypes (a tablet application, family story videos, and a virtual reality experience) to be tested in a final session. RESULTS Ninety-five individuals (48 mothers/partners; 47 providers) from two hospitals participated. Most participants agreed that the prototypes should include factual, unbiased outcomes and probabilities. Mothers and support partners also desired comprehensive explanations of delivery and care options, while providers wanted a tool to ease communication, help elicit values, and share patient experiences. Participants ultimately favored the tablet application and suggested that it include family testimonial videos. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that a DST that combines unbiased information and understandable outcomes with family testimonials would be meaningful for periviable SDM. User-centered design was found to be a useful method for creating a DST prototype that may lead to improved effectiveness, usability, uptake, and dissemination in the future, by leveraging the expertise of a wide range of stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
| | - Shelley M Hoffman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Dustin Lynch
- Patient Engagement Core, Community Health Partnerships, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Erin Jeffries
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Kelli Jenkins
- Patient Engagement Core, Community Health Partnerships, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Sarah Wiehe
- Patient Engagement Core, Community Health Partnerships, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Nerissa Bauer
- Patient Engagement Core, Community Health Partnerships, Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W. 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA
| | - Miriam Kuppermann
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, 550 16th St, Box 0132, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Geurtzen R, van Heijst A, Draaisma J, Ouwerkerk L, Scheepers H, Hogeveen M, Hermens R. Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:1541-1549. [PMID: 30948203 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In-depth analysis of parental preferences in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity. METHODS A nationwide qualitative interview study among experienced parents of extremely premature babies born at 24+0/7 - 24+6/7 weeks of gestation. Semi-structured interviews were held until saturation, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed to search for parental counseling preferences. RESULTS Thirteen parents were included, most parents decided on active care. Organisation: Parents wanted counseling as soon as possible, and for various reasons they wanted more than one conversation. Supportive material to help visualize complex information was suggested to be helpful, preferably with adjustable levels of detail. An empathetic, honest style with commitment of the counselor was regarded important. CONTENT Understandable statistics should be used for those who want it. Parents needed different information with respect to the decision-making as opposed to being prepared for future situations. Decision-making: The preferred share of parents' and doctors' input in decision-making varied among parents and among situations. Parents expressed that their roles were to take responsibility for and protect their infant. CONCLUSIONS Various parental preferences for prenatal counseling were found. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Common parental preferences for the organisation, content and decision-making elements can provide a starting point for personalized prenatal counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Geurtzen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Arno van Heijst
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Draaisma
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Laura Ouwerkerk
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marije Hogeveen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Rosella Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cavolo A, Dierckx de Casterlé B, Naulaers G, Gastmans C. Physicians' Attitudes on Resuscitation of Extremely Premature Infants: A Systematic Review. Pediatrics 2019; 143:peds.2018-3972. [PMID: 31076541 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-3972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Whether to resuscitate extremely premature infants (EPIs) is a clinically and ethically difficult decision to make. Indications and practices vary greatly across different countries and institutions, which suggests that resuscitation decisions may be influenced more by the attitudes of the individual treating physicians. Hence, gaining in-depth insight into physicians' attitudes improves our understanding of decision-making regarding resuscitation of EPIs. OBJECTIVE To better understand physicians' attitudes toward resuscitation of EPIs and factors that influence their attitudes through a systematic review of the empirical literature. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. STUDY SELECTION We selected English-language articles in which researchers report on empirical studies of physicians' attitudes toward resuscitation of EPIs. DATA EXTRACTION The articles were repeatedly read, themes were identified, and data were tabulated, compared, and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS Thirty-four articles were included. In general, physicians were more willing to resuscitate, to accept parents' resuscitation requests, and to refuse parents' nonresuscitation requests as gestational age (GA) increased. However, attitudes vary greatly for infants at GA 23 to 24 weeks, known as the gray zone. Although GA is the primary factor that influences physicians' attitudes, a complex interplay of patient- and non-patient-related factors also influences their attitudes. LIMITATIONS Analysis of English-only articles may limit generalizability of the results. In addition, authors of only 1 study used a qualitative approach, which may have led to a biased reductionist approach to understanding physicians' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Although correlations between GA and attitudes emerged, the results suggested a more complex interplay of factors influencing such attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Cavolo
- Interfaculty Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law,
| | | | - Gunnar Naulaers
- Section of Pregnancy, Foetus and Newborn, Department of Development and Regeneration, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boland L, Graham ID, Légaré F, Lewis K, Jull J, Shephard A, Lawson ML, Davis A, Yameogo A, Stacey D. Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2019; 14:7. [PMID: 30658670 PMCID: PMC6339273 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0851-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) is rarely implemented in pediatric practice. Pediatric health decision-making differs from that of adult practice. Yet, little is known about the factors that influence the implementation of pediatric shared decision-making (SDM). We synthesized pediatric SDM barriers and facilitators from the perspectives of healthcare providers (HCP), parents, children, and observers (i.e., persons who evaluated the SDM process, but were not directly involved). METHODS We conducted a systematic review guided by the Ottawa Model of Research Use (OMRU). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, and PsycINFO (inception to March 2017) and included studies that reported clinical pediatric SDM barriers and/or facilitators from the perspective of HCPs, parents, children, and/or observers. We considered all or no comparison groups and included all study designs reporting original data. Content analysis was used to synthesize barriers and facilitators and categorized them according to the OMRU levels (i.e., decision, innovation, adopters, relational, and environment) and participant types (i.e., HCP, parents, children, and observers). We used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to appraise study quality. RESULTS Of 20,008 identified citations, 79 were included. At each OMRU level, the most frequent barriers were features of the options (decision), poor quality information (innovation), parent/child emotional state (adopter), power relations (relational), and insufficient time (environment). The most frequent facilitators were low stake decisions (decision), good quality information (innovation), agreement with SDM (adopter), trust and respect (relational), and SDM tools/resources (environment). Across participant types, the most frequent barriers were insufficient time (HCPs), features of the options (parents), power imbalances (children), and HCP skill for SDM (observers). The most frequent facilitators were good quality information (HCP) and agreement with SDM (parents and children). There was no consistent facilitator category for observers. Overall, study quality was moderate with quantitative studies having the highest ratings and mixed-method studies having the lowest ratings. CONCLUSIONS Numerous diverse and interrelated factors influence SDM use in pediatric clinical practice. Our findings can be used to identify potential pediatric SDM barriers and facilitators, guide context-specific barrier and facilitator assessments, and inform interventions for implementing SDM in pediatric practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42015020527.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Boland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 540 King Edward Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, 307D-600 Peter Morand Cresent, Ottawa, ON, K1G 5Z3, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- CHU de Québec Research Centre-Université Laval site Hôpital St-Francois d'Assise, 10 Rue Espinay, Quebec City, Quebec, G1L 3L5, Canada
| | - Krystina Lewis
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 540 King Edward Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Janet Jull
- School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, 31 George Street Kingston, Ottawa, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada
| | - Allyson Shephard
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada
| | - Margaret L Lawson
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1, Canada
| | - Alexandra Davis
- Learning Services, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Audrey Yameogo
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, 540 King Edward Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Marsac ML, Kindler C, Weiss D, Ragsdale L. Let's Talk About It: Supporting Family Communication during End-of-Life Care of Pediatric Patients. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:862-878. [PMID: 29775556 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Communication is key in optimizing medical care when a child is approaching end of life (EOL). Research is yet to establish best practices for how medical teams can guide intrafamily communication (including surviving siblings) when EOL care is underway or anticipated for a pediatric patient. While recommendations regarding how medical teams can facilitate communication between the medical team and the family exist, various barriers may prevent the implementation of these recommendations. OBJECTIVE This review aims to provide a summary of research-to-date on family and medical provider perceptions of communication during pediatric EOL care. DESIGN Systematic review. RESULTS Findings from a review of 65 studies suggest that when a child enters EOL care, many parents try to protect their child and/or themselves by avoiding discussions about death. Despite current recommendations, medical teams often refrain from discussing EOL care with pediatric patients until death is imminent for a variety of reasons (e.g., family factors and discomfort with EOL conversations). Parents consistently report a need for honest complete information, delivered with sensitivity. Pediatric patients often report a preference to be informed of their prognosis, and siblings express a desire to be involved in EOL discussions. CONCLUSIONS Families may benefit from enhanced communication around EOL planning, both within the family and between the family and medical team. Future research should investigate a potential role for medical teams in supporting intrafamily communication about EOL challenges and should examine how communication between medical teams and families can be facilitated as EOL approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghan L Marsac
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky.,2 College of Medicine, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Christine Kindler
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Danielle Weiss
- 3 Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Lindsay Ragsdale
- 1 Department of Pediatrics, Kentucky Children's Hospital , Lexington, Kentucky.,2 College of Medicine, University of Kentucky , Lexington, Kentucky
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Antenatal Consultations at Extreme Prematurity: A Systematic Review of Parent Communication Needs. J Pediatr 2018; 196:109-115.e7. [PMID: 29223461 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.10.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize and describe parental expectations on how healthcare professionals should interact with them during a peripartum, antenatal consultation for extremely preterm infants. STUDY DESIGN For this systematic literature review with textual narrative synthesis, we included studies that explored parental perspectives regarding the antenatal consultation for an extremely preterm infant. Electronic searches of Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and Embase were conducted, along with a search of the grey literature. Quality appraisal was conducted using the guide by Walsh and Downe. Two independent reviewers reviewed 783 titles, of which 130 abstracts then 40 full-text articles were reviewed. Final data abstraction includes 19 studies. We predetermined 6 topics of interest (setting, timing, preferred healthcare professional, information, resources, and parents-physician interaction) to facilitate thematic analysis. RESULTS In consideration of the variability of parents' specific desires, six predetermined topics and additional overarching themes such as perception of support, degree of understanding, hope, spirituality, and decision-making influences emerged. Studies suggest the quality of the antenatal consultation is not purely about information content, but also the manner in which it is provided. Limitations include thematic analysis that can potentially lead to the exclusion of important nuances. Relevant studies may have been missed if published outside the healthcare literature. CONCLUSIONS The findings may inform clinical practice guidelines. This paper includes suggested strategies related to parents' perspectives that may facilitate communication during antenatal consultation for an extremely preterm infant. These strategies may also support parental engagement and satisfaction.
Collapse
|
21
|
Dunn SI, Cragg B, Graham ID, Medves J, Gaboury I. Roles, processes, and outcomes of interprofessional shared decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit: A qualitative study. J Interprof Care 2018; 32:284-294. [PMID: 29364748 DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1428186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Shared decision-making provides an opportunity for the knowledge and skills of care providers to synergistically influence patient care. Little is known about interprofessional shared decision-making processes in critical care settings. The aim of this study was to explore interprofessional team members' perspectives about the nature of interprofessional shared decision-making in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to determine if there are any differences in perspectives across professional groups. An exploratory qualitative approach was used consisting of semi-structured interviews with 22 members of an interprofessional team working in a tertiary care NICU in Canada. Participants identified four key roles involved in interprofessional shared decision-making: leader, clinical experts, parents, and synthesizer. Participants perceived that interprofessional shared decision-making happens through collaboration, sharing, and weighing the options, the evidence and the credibility of opinions put forward. The process of interprofessional shared decision-making leads to a well-informed decision and participants feeling valued. Findings from this study identified key concepts of interprofessional shared decision-making, increased awareness of differing professional perspectives about this process of shared decision-making, and clarified understanding of the different roles involved in the decision-making process in an NICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra I Dunn
- a School of Nursing , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada
| | - Betty Cragg
- a School of Nursing , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- a School of Nursing , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Ontario , Canada
| | - Jennifer Medves
- b School of Nursing , Queen's University , Kingston , Ontario , Canada
| | - Isabelle Gaboury
- c Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine , Université de Sherbrooke , Québec , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Typically pediatric end-of-life decision-making studies have examined the decision-making process, factors, and doctors' and parents' roles. Less attention has focussed on what happens after an end-of-life decision is made; that is, decision enactment and its outcome. This study explored the views and experiences of bereaved parents in end-of-life decision-making for their child. Findings reported relate to parents' experiences of acting on their decision. It is argued that this is one significant stage of the decision-making process. METHODS A qualitative methodology was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with bereaved parents, who had discussed end-of-life decisions for their child who had a life-limiting condition and who had died. Data were thematically analysed. RESULTS Twenty-five bereaved parents participated. Findings indicate that, despite differences in context, including the child's condition and age, end-of-life decision-making did not end when an end-of-life decision was made. Enacting the decision was the next stage in a process. Time intervals between stages and enactment pathways varied, but the enactment was always distinguishable as a separate stage. Decision enactment involved making further decisions - parents needed to discern the appropriate time to implement their decision to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining medical treatment. Unexpected events, including other people's actions, impacted on parents enacting their decision in the way they had planned. Several parents had to re-implement decisions when their child recovered from serious health issues without medical intervention. Significance of results A novel, critical finding was that parents experienced end-of-life decision-making as a sequence of interconnected stages, the final stage being enactment. The enactment stage involved further decision-making. End-of-life decision-making is better understood as a process rather than a discrete once-off event. The enactment stage has particular emotional and practical implications for parents. Greater understanding of this stage can improve clinician's support for parents as they care for their child.
Collapse
|
23
|
Geurtzen R, Van Heijst A, Hermens R, Scheepers H, Woiski M, Draaisma J, Hogeveen M. Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018; 18:7. [PMID: 29298669 PMCID: PMC5751814 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-017-1644-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Since 2010, intensive care can be offered in the Netherlands at 24+0 weeks gestation (with parental consent) but the Dutch guideline lacks recommendations on organization, content and preferred decision-making of the counselling. Our aim is to explore preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability by Dutch perinatal professionals and compare this to current care. Methods Online nationwide survey as part of the PreCo study (2013) amongst obstetricians and neonatologists in all Dutch level III perinatal care centers (n = 205).The survey regarded prenatal counselling at the limits of viability and focused on the domains of organization, content and decision-making in both current and preferred practice. Results One hundred twenty-two surveys were returned out of 205 eligible professionals (response rate 60%). Organization-wise: more than 80% of all professionals preferred (but currently missed) having protocols for several aspects of counselling, joint counselling by both neonatologist and obstetrician, and the use of supportive materials. Most professionals preferred using national or local data (70%) on outcome statistics for the counselling content, in contrast to the international statistics currently used (74%). Current decisions on initiation care were mostly made together (in 99% parents and doctor). This shared decision model was preferred by 95% of the professionals. Conclusions Dutch perinatal professionals would prefer more protocolized counselling, joint counselling, supportive material and local outcome statistics. Further studies on both barriers to perform adequate counselling, as well as on Dutch outcome statistics and parents’ opinions are needed in order to develop a national framework. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02782650, retrospectively registered May 2016. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12884-017-1644-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Geurtzen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud university Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Arno Van Heijst
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud university Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rosella Hermens
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Care, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Mallory Woiski
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jos Draaisma
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud university Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Hogeveen
- Amalia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Radboud university Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lemyre B, Moore G. Les conseils et la prise en charge en prévision d’une naissance extrêmement prématurée. Paediatr Child Health 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
25
|
Lemyre B, Moore G. Counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health 2017; 22:334-341. [PMID: 29485138 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxx058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Counselling couples facing the birth of an extremely preterm infant is a complex and delicate task, entailing both challenges and opportunities. This revised position statement proposes using a prognosis-based approach that takes the best estimate of gestational age into account, along with additional factors, including estimated fetal weight, receipt of antenatal corticosteroids, singleton versus multiple pregnancy, fetal status and anomalies on ultrasound and place of birth. This statement updates data on survival in Canada, long-term neurodevelopmental disability at school age and quality of life, with focus on strategies to communicate effectively with parents. It also proposes a framework for determining the prognosis-based management option(s) to present to parents when initiating the decision-making process. This statement replaces the 2012 position statement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Lemyre
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| | - Gregory Moore
- Canadian Paediatric Society, Fetus and Newborn Committee, Ottawa, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Counselling about the Risk of Preterm Delivery: A Systematic Review. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:7320583. [PMID: 28848765 PMCID: PMC5564059 DOI: 10.1155/2017/7320583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/17/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to describe the outcomes of counselling for preterm delivery. PubMed, Embase, and PsycInfo were systematically searched (from 2000 to 2016) using the following terms: counselling, pregnancy complications, high-risk pregnancy, fetal diseases, and prenatal care. A total of nine quantitative studies were identified, five randomized and four nonrandomized. All studies were conducted in the USA, and half of them were based on a simulated counselling session. Two main clinical implications can be drawn from the available studies: firstly, providing written information before or during the consultation seems to have a positive effect, while no effect was detected when written material was provided after the consultation. Secondly, parents' choices about treatment seemed to be influenced by spiritual-related aspects and/or preexisting preferences, rather than by the level of detail or by the order with which information was provided. Therefore, the exploration of parents' beliefs is crucial to reduce the risks of misconception and to guarantee choice in line with personal values. More research is necessary to validate these findings in cross-cultural contexts and in real world settings of care. Moreover, the centeredness of conversations and the characteristics of the clinician involved in counselling should be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
|
27
|
Stokes TA, Kukora SK, Boss RD. Caring for Families at the Limits of Viability: The Education of Dr Green. Clin Perinatol 2017; 44:447-459. [PMID: 28477671 DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2017.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Resuscitation decisions for infants born at the edges of viability are complicated moral dilemmas, and the process of making these decisions is emotionally exhausting and morally distressful for families and physicians alike. An ethical approach to making these decisions requires input from physicians and parents; individuals tasked with facilitating such decisions must possess the communication and counseling skills needed to assist families with these painful and life-altering decisions. It is incumbent on all of us to continue our investigation into how we can better assist families in this process while providing care that is in their best interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theophil A Stokes
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, 8901 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20889, USA.
| | - Stephanie K Kukora
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Floor 8, 1540 E Hospital Dr SPC 4254, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Renee D Boss
- Division of Neonatology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Berman Institute of Bioethics, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Delany C, Xafis V, Gillam L, Hughson JA, Hynson J, Wilkinson D. A good resource for parents, but will clinicians use it?: Evaluation of a resource for paediatric end-of-life decision making. BMC Palliat Care 2017; 16:12. [PMID: 28122549 PMCID: PMC5264290 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-016-0177-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Communication with parents about end-of-life care and decisions is a difficult and sensitive process. The objective of the present study was to ascertain clinicians’ views on the acceptability and usefulness of a handbook and web-based resource (Caring Decisions) that was designed as an aid for parents facing end-of-life decisions for their child. Methods Qualitative interviews were conducted with a range of health professionals who provide care to children facing life-limiting conditions. Results Data analysis confirmed the acceptability and usefulness of the resource. Two major themes were revealed: 1. Family empowerment, with sub-themes Giving words and clarity, Conversation starter, ‘I’m not alone in this’, and A resource to take away, highlighted how the resource filled a gap by supporting and enabling families in a multitude of ways; 2. Not just for families, with sub-themes A guide for staff, When to give the resource?, How to give the resource and Who should give the resource?, explored the significant finding that participants viewed the resource as a valuable tool for themselves, but its presence also brought into relief potential gaps in communication processes around end-of-life care. Conclusion The interview data indicated the positive reception and clear value and need for this type of resource. However, it is likely that successful resource uptake will be contingent on discussion and planning around dissemination and use within the health care team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Delany
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia. .,University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia.
| | - Vicki Xafis
- Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.,Centre for Values Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Medical Foundation Building K25, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | | | - Jenny Hynson
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC, 3052, Australia
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Suite 8, Littlegate House, St Ebbes Street, Oxford, OX1 1PT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Daboval T, Shidler S, Thomas D. Shared Decision Making at the Limit of Viability: A Blueprint for Physician Action. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166151. [PMID: 27893823 PMCID: PMC5125593 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To document interactions during the antenatal consultation between parents and neonatologist that parents linked to their satisfaction with their participation in shared decision making for their infant at risk of being born at the limit of viability. Methods This multiple-case ethnomethodological qualitative research study, included mothers admitted for a threatened premature delivery between 200/7 and 266/7 weeks gestation, the father, and the staff neonatologist conducting the clinical antenatal consultation. Content analysis of an audiotaped post-antenatal consultation interview with parents obtained their satisfaction scores as well as their comments on physician actions that facilitated their desired participation. Results Five cases, each called a “system—infant at risk”, included 10 parents and 6 neonatologists. From the interviews emerged a blueprint for action by physicians, including communication strategies that parents say facilitated their participation in decision making; such as building trustworthy physician-parent relationships, providing "balanced" information, offering choices, and allowing time to think. Conclusion Parent descriptions indicate that the opportunity to participate to their satisfaction in the clinical antenatal consultation depends on how the physician interacts with them. Practice implications The parent-identified communication strategies facilitate shared decision making regarding treatment in the best interest of the infant at risk to be born at the limit of viability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Daboval
- Children’s hospital of Eastern Ontario. Department Pediatrics. The Ottawa Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- * E-mail:
| | - Sarah Shidler
- Department of Health Science Sciences, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, Canada
| | - Daniel Thomas
- Department of Human Sciences, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lerret SM, Haglund KA, Johnson NL. Parents' Perspectives on Shared Decision Making for Children With Solid Organ Transplants. J Pediatr Health Care 2016; 30:374-80. [PMID: 26547482 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2015.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Revised: 09/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Institute of Medicine prioritizes active family and clinician participation in treatment decisions, known as shared decision making (SDM). In this article we report the decision-making experiences for parents of children who had a solid organ transplant. METHOD We performed a prospective longitudinal mixed methods study at five major U.S. children's medical centers. Qualitative interview data were obtained at 3 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after hospital discharge following the child's transplant. RESULTS Forty-eight parents participated in the study. Three themes were identified: (a) Parents expect to participate in SDM; (b) parents seek information to support their participation in SDM; and (c) attributes of providers' professional practice facilitates SDM. SDM was facilitated when providers were knowledgeable, transparent, approachable, accessible, dependable, and supportive. CONCLUSIONS Parents expect to participate in SDM with their transplant team. Health care providers can intentionally use the six key attributes to engage parents in SDM. The results provide a framework to consider enhancing SDM in other chronic illness populations.
Collapse
|
31
|
Tucker Edmonds B, McKenzie F, Panoch JE, White DB, Barnato AE. A Pilot Study of Neonatologists' Decision-Making Roles in Delivery Room Resuscitation Counseling for Periviable Births. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2016; 7:175-182. [PMID: 27547778 PMCID: PMC4990074 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1085460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relatively little is known about neonatologists' roles in helping families navigate the difficult decision to attempt or withhold resuscitation for a neonate delivering at the threshold of viability. Therefore, we aimed to describe the "decision-making role" of neonatologists in simulated periviable counseling sessions. METHODS We conducted a qualitative content analysis of audio-recorded simulation encounters and post-encounter debriefing interviews collected as part of a single-center simulation study of neonatologists' resuscitation counseling practices in the face of ruptured membranes at 23 weeks gestation. We trained standardized patients to request a recommendation if the physician presented multiple treatment options. We coded each encounter for communication behaviors, applying an adapted, previously developed coding scheme to classify physicians into four decision-making roles (informative, facilitative, collaborative, or directive). We also coded post-simulation debriefing interviews for responses to the open-ended prompt: "During this encounter, what did you feel was your role in the management decision-making process?" RESULTS Fifteen neonatologists (33% of the division) participated in the study; audio-recorded debriefing interviews were available for 13. We observed 9 (60%) take an informative role, providing medical information only; 2 (13%) take a facilitative role, additionally eliciting the patient's values; 3 (20%) take a collaborative role, additionally engaging the patient in deliberation and providing a recommendation; and 1 (7%) take a directive role, making a treatment decision independent of the patient. Almost all (10/13, 77%) of the neonatologists described their intended role as informative. CONCLUSIONS Neonatologists did not routinely elicit preferences, engage in deliberation, or provide treatment recommendations-even in response to requests for recommendations. These findings suggest there may be a gap between policy recommendations calling for shared decision making and actual clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fatima McKenzie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine
| | - Janet E. Panoch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine
| | - Douglas B. White
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Amber E. Barnato
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians' preferences despite guideline. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175:1039-46. [PMID: 27251669 PMCID: PMC4930484 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2741-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/25/2016] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Decisions at the limits of viability about initiating care are challenging. We aimed to investigate physicians' preferences on treatment decisions, against the background of the 2010 Dutch guideline offering active care from 24(+0/7) weeks of gestational age (GA). Obstetricians' and neonatologists' opinions were compared. An online survey was conducted amongst all perinatal professionals (n = 205) of the 10 Dutch level III perinatal care centers. Response rate was 60 % (n = 122). Comfort care was mostly recommended below 24(+0/7) weeks and intensive care over 26(+0/7) weeks. The professional views varied most at 24 and 25 weeks, with intensive care recommended but comfort care at parental request optional being the median. There was a wide range in perceived lowest limits of GA for interventions as a caesarian section and a neonatologist present at birth. Obstetricians and neonatologists disagreed on the lowest limit providing chest compressions and administering epinephrine for resuscitation. The main factors restricting active treatment were presence of congenital disorders, "small for gestational age" fetus, and incomplete course of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION There was a wide variety in individually preferred treatment decisions, especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity. Furthermore, obstetricians and neonatologists did not always agree. WHAT IS KNOWN • Cross-cultural differences exists in the preferred treatment at the limits of viability • In the Netherlands since 2010, intensive care can be offered starting at 24 (+0/7) weeks gestation What is new: • There was a wide variety in preferred treatment decisions at the limits of viability especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch national guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity.
Collapse
|
33
|
Wilman E, Megone C, Oliver S, Duley L, Gyte G, Wright JM. The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research. Trials 2015; 16:502. [PMID: 26537492 PMCID: PMC4634156 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-0957-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conducting clinical trials with pre-term or sick infants is important if care for this population is to be underpinned by sound evidence. Yet approaching parents at this difficult time raises challenges for the obtaining of valid informed consent to such research. This study asked: what light does the empirical literature cast on an ethically defensible approach to the obtaining of informed consent in perinatal clinical trials? METHODS A systematic search identified 49 studies. Analysis began by applying philosophical frameworks which were then refined in light of the concepts emerging from empirical studies to present a coherent picture of a broad literature. RESULTS Between them, studies addressed the attitudes of both parents and clinicians concerning consent in neonatal trials; the validity of the consent process in the neonatal research context; and different possible methods of obtaining consent. CONCLUSIONS Despite a variety of opinions among parents and clinicians there is a strongly and widely held view that it is important that parents do give or decline consent for neonatal participation in trials. However, none of the range of existing consent processes reviewed by the research is satisfactory. A significant gap is evaluation of the widespread practice of emergency 'assent', in which parents assent or refuse their baby's participation as best they can during the emergency and later give full consent to ongoing participation and follow-up. Emergency assent has not been evaluated for its acceptability, how such a process would deal with bad outcomes such as neonatal death between assent and consent, or the extent to which late parental refusal might bias results. This review of a large number of empirical papers, while not making fundamental changes, has refined and developed the conceptual framework from philosophy for examining informed consent in this context.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Attitude of Health Personnel
- Clinical Trials as Topic/ethics
- Emergencies
- Emotions
- Gestational Age
- Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- Humans
- Infant, Newborn
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/mortality
- Infant, Newborn, Diseases/therapy
- Infant, Premature
- Motivation
- Parental Consent/ethics
- Parents/psychology
- Research Design
- Risk Assessment
- Volition
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Wilman
- Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - C Megone
- Inter-Disciplinary Ethics Applied, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - S Oliver
- Social Science Research Unit and EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education, University of London, London, UK.
| | - L Duley
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, Nottingham Health Science Partners, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
| | - G Gyte
- National Childbirth Trust, London, UK.
| | - J M Wright
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tucker Edmonds B, Torke AM, Helft P, Wocial LD. Doctor, What Would You Do? An ANSWER for Patients Requesting Advice About Value-Laden Decisions. Pediatrics 2015; 136:740-5. [PMID: 26416929 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-1808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
This article presents a previously published framework, summarized in the mnemonic ANSWER (A, Active listening; N, Needs assessment; S, Self-awareness/reflection; W, Whose perspective?; E, Elicit values; R, Respond) for how to respond to the question, "Doctor, what would you do?" when considering medical decisions that are preference-sensitive, meaning there is limited or debatable evidence to guide clinical recommendations, or are value-laden, such that the "right" decision may differ based on the context or values of a given individual. Using the mnemonic and practical examples, we attempt to make the framework for an ethically appropriate approach to these conversations more accessible for clinicians. Rather than a decision rule, this mnemonic represents a set of points to consider when physicians are considering an ethically acceptable response that fosters trust and rapport. We apply this approach to a case of periviable counseling, among the more emotionally challenging and value-laden antenatal decisions faced by providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexia M Torke
- Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; and
| | - Paul Helft
- Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; and
| | - Lucia D Wocial
- Charles Warren Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Indiana University School of Nursing, Department of Community Health Systems, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Xafis V, Gillam L, Hynson J, Sullivan J, Cossich M, Wilkinson D. Caring Decisions: The Development of a Written Resource for Parents Facing End-of-Life Decisions. J Palliat Med 2015; 18:945-55. [PMID: 26418215 PMCID: PMC4638203 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Written resources in adult intensive care have been shown to benefit families facing end of life (EoL) decisions. There are few resources for parents making EoL decisions for their child and no existing resources addressing ethical issues. The Caring Decisions handbook and website were developed to fill these gaps. Aim: We discuss the development of the resources, modification after reviewer feedback and findings from initial pilot implementation. Design: A targeted literature review-to identify resources and factors that impact on parental EoL decision-making; development phase-guided by the literature and the researchers' expertise; consultation process-comprised a multi-disciplinary panel of experts and parents; pilot evaluation study-hard-copy handbook was distributed as part of routine care at an Australian Children's Hospital. Setting/Participants: Twelve experts and parents formed the consultation panel. Eight parents of children with life-limiting conditions and clinicians were interviewed in the pilot study. Results: Numerous factors supporting/impeding EoL decisions were identified. Caring Decisions addressed issues identified in the literature and by the multidisciplinary research team. The consultation panel provided overwhelmingly positive feedback. Pilot study parents found the resources helpful and comforting. Most clinicians viewed the resources as very beneficial to parents and identified them as ideal for training purposes. Conclusions: The development of the resources addressed many of the gaps in existing resources. The consultation process and the pilot study suggest these resources could be of significant benefit to parents and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Xafis
- 1 Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's and Children's Hospital, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia .,2 The Sydney Children's Hospitals Network , Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lynn Gillam
- 3 Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne, Australia .,5 Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jenny Hynson
- 4 Victorian Paediatric Palliative Care Program, The Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jane Sullivan
- 3 Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne, Australia .,5 Centre for Health Equity, University of Melbourne , Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mary Cossich
- 6 Disciplines of Palliative Medicine and General Paediatrics, Women's and Children's Health Network , Adelaide, Australia
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- 1 Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's and Children's Hospital, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide, Australia .,7 Medical Ethics Department, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford University , Oxford, United Kingdom .,8 John Radcliffe Hospital , Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Edmonds BT, McKenzie F, Panoch JE, Barnato AE, Frankel RM. Comparing obstetricians' and neonatologists' approaches to periviable counseling. J Perinatol 2015; 35:344-8. [PMID: 25474555 PMCID: PMC4414911 DOI: 10.1038/jp.2014.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2014] [Revised: 09/19/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the management options, risks and thematic content that obstetricians and neonatologists discuss in periviable counseling. STUDY DESIGN Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists counseled simulated patients portraying a pregnant woman with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks of gestation. Transcripts from video-recorded encounters were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed for informational content and decision-making themes. RESULT Obstetricians more frequently discussed antibiotics (P=0.005), maternal risks (<0.001) and cesarean risks (<0.005). Neonatologists more frequently discussed neonatal complications (P=0.044), resuscitation (P=0.015) and palliative options (P=0.023). Obstetricians and neonatologists often deferred questions about steroid administration to the other specialty. Both specialties organized decision making around medical information, survival, quality of life, time and support. Neonatologists also introduced themes of values, comfort or suffering, and uncertainty. CONCLUSION Obstetricians and neonatologists provided complementary counseling content to patients, yet neither specialty took ownership of steroid discussions. Joint counseling and/or family meetings may minimize observed redundancy and inconsistencies in counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brownsyne Tucker Edmonds
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Fatima McKenzie
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Janet E. Panoch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Amber E. Barnato
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Richard M. Frankel
- Mary Margaret Walther Center for Research and Education in Palliative Care, IU Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Xafis V, Wilkinson D, Sullivan J. What information do parents need when facing end-of-life decisions for their child? A meta-synthesis of parental feedback. BMC Palliat Care 2015; 14:19. [PMID: 25924893 PMCID: PMC4424961 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-015-0024-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2014] [Accepted: 04/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The information needs of parents facing end-of-life decisions for their child are complex due to the wide-ranging dimensions within which such significant events unfold. While parents acknowledge that healthcare professionals are their main source of information, they also turn to a variety of additional sources of written information in an attempt to source facts, discover solutions, and find hope. Much has been written about the needs of parents faced with end-of-life decisions for their child but little is known about the written information needs such parents have. Research in the adult intensive care context has shown that written resources impact positively on the understanding of medical facts, including diagnoses and prognoses, communication between families and healthcare professionals, and the emotional wellbeing of families after their relative’s death. Methods A meta-synthesis of predominantly empirical research pertaining to features which assist or impede parental end-of-life decisions was undertaken to provide insight and guidance in our development of written resources (short print and online comprehensive version) for parents. Results The most prominently cited needs in the literature related to numerous aspects of information provision; the quantity, quality, delivery, and timing of information and its provision impacted not only on parents’ ability to make end-of-life decisions but also on their emotional wellbeing. The meta-synthesis supports the value of written materials, as these provide guidance for both parents and healthcare professionals in pertinent content areas. Conclusions Further research is required to determine the impact that written resources have on parental end-of-life decision-making and on parents’ wellbeing during and after their experience and time in the hospital environment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-015-0024-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Xafis
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
| | - Dominic Wilkinson
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. .,John Radcliffe Hospital Oxford, Director of Medical Ethics, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jane Sullivan
- Children's Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. .,The Centre for Health Equity, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Green J, Darbyshire P, Adams A, Jackson D. Balancing hope with reality: how neonatal nurses manage the uncertainty of caring for extremely premature babies. J Clin Nurs 2015; 24:2410-8. [DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Green
- Faculty of Health; University of Technology, Sydney; Lindfield NSW Australia
| | - Philip Darbyshire
- Schools of Nursing & Midwifery; Monash University and Flinders University; Adelaide SA Australia
- Philip Darbyshire Consulting Ltd; Highbury SA Australia
| | - Anne Adams
- Oxford Brookes University; Oxford United Kingdom
- University of New England; Armidale Australia
| | - Debra Jackson
- Oxford Brookes University; Oxford United Kingdom
- University of New England; Armidale Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Molloy J, Evans M, Coughlin K. Moral distress in the resuscitation of extremely premature infants. Nurs Ethics 2014; 22:52-63. [PMID: 24714050 DOI: 10.1177/0969733014523169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To increase our understanding of moral distress experienced by neonatal registered nurses when directly or indirectly involved in the decision-making process of resuscitating infants who are born extremely premature. DESIGN A secondary qualitative analysis was conducted on a portion of the data collected from an earlier study which explored the ethical decision-making process among health professionals and parents concerning resuscitation of extremely premature infants. SETTING A regional, tertiary academic referral hospital in Ontario offering a perinatal program. PARTICIPANTS A total of 15 registered nurses were directly or indirectly involved in the resuscitation of extremely premature infants. METHODS Interview transcripts of nurses from the original study were purposefully selected from the original 42 transcripts of health professionals. Inductive content analysis was conducted to identify themes describing factors and situations contributing to moral distress experienced by nurses regarding resuscitation of extremely premature infants. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Ethical approval was obtained from the research ethics review board for both the initial study and this secondary data analysis. RESULTS Five themes, uncertainty, questioning of informed consent, differing perspectives, perceptions of harm and suffering, and being with the family, contribute to the moral distress felt by nurses when exposed to neonatal resuscitation of extremely premature infants. An interesting finding was the nurses' perceived lack of power and influence in the neonatal resuscitation decision-making process. CONCLUSION Moral distress continues to be a significant issue for nursing practice, particularly among neonatal nurses. Strategies are needed to help mediate the moral distress experienced by nurses, such as debriefing sessions, effective communication, role clarification, and interprofessional education and collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marilyn Evans
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin Coughlin
- Division of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE End-of-life decision-making is difficult for everyone involved, as many studies have shown. Within this complexity, there has been little information on how parents see the role of doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children. This study aimed to examine parents' views and experiences of end-of-life decision-making. DESIGN A qualitative method with a semistructured interview design was used. SETTING Parent participants were living in the community. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five bereaved parents. MAIN OUTCOMES Parents reported varying roles taken by doctors: being the provider of information without opinion; giving information and advice as to the decision that should be taken; and seemingly being the decision maker for the child. The majority of parents found their child's doctor enabled them to be the ultimate decision maker for their child, which was what they very clearly wanted to be, and consequently enabled them to exercise their parental autonomy. Parents found it problematic when doctors took over decision-making. A less frequently reported, yet significant role for doctors was to affirm decisions after they had been made by parents. Other important aspects of the doctor's role were to provide follow-up support and referral. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the role that doctors take in end-of-life decisions, and the subsequent impact of that role from the perspective of parents can form the basis of better informed clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Sullivan
- Children's Bioethics Centre, Royal Children's Hospital, , Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Manen MA. On ethical (in)decisions experienced by parents of infants in neonatal intensive care. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2014; 24:279-287. [PMID: 24469694 DOI: 10.1177/1049732313520081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
This study was a phenomenological investigation of ethical decisions experienced by parents of newborns in neonatal intensive care. I explore the lived meanings of thematic events that speak to the variable ways that ethical situations may be experienced: a decision that was never a choice; a decision as looking for a way out; a decision as thinking and feeling oneself through the consequences; a decision as indecision; and a decision as something that one falls into. The concluding recommendations spell out the need for understanding the experiences of parents whose children require medical care and underscore the tactful sensitivities required of the health care team during moral-ethical decision making.
Collapse
|
42
|
Rosenthal SA, Nolan MT. A meta-ethnography and theory of parental ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2013; 42:492-502. [PMID: 23773116 DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To synthesize the existing qualitative literature about parent ethical decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and to investigate the potential impact of culture on parents' decision making experiences. DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL plus, and PsychInfo using the search terms parental decision making, culture, race, decision making, and parental decisions. STUDY SELECTION Qualitative research studies investigating decision making for infants in the NICU from the parents' perspective were included. Studies involving older pediatric populations were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Ten primary qualitative research articles were included. The primary author read all manuscripts and tabulated themes related to parents' ethical decision making. DATA SYNTHESIS Study findings were synthesized using meta-ethnography involving translating concepts of separate studies into one another, exploring contradictions, and organizing these concepts into new theories. Key themes included parent involvement in decision making, parental role, necessity of good information, need for communication, desire for hope and compassion conveyed by providers, decision making satisfaction, and trust in caregiving team. A preliminary theoretical framework of ethical parent decision making was modeled based on the proposed relationships between the themes. CONCLUSIONS Parent preferences for their involvement in decision making, their perceptions of communication with providers, and their relationships with providers are all important factors in the experience of making decisions for their infants. Needs of parents were the same regardless the ethnic or racial diversity of study participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Rosenthal
- School of Nursing, Notre Dame of Maryland University, Baltimore, MD 21210, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Huang LC, Chen CH, Liu HL, Lee HY, Peng NH, Wang TM, Chang YC. The attitudes of neonatal professionals towards end-of-life decision-making for dying infants in Taiwan. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2013; 39:382-386. [PMID: 22562946 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The purposes of research were to describe the neonatal clinicians' personal views and attitudes on neonatal ethical decision-making, to identify factors that might affect these attitudes and to compare the attitudes between neonatal physicians and neonatal nurses in Taiwan. Research was a cross-sectional design and a questionnaire was used to reach different research purposes. A convenient sample was used to recruit 24 physicians and 80 neonatal nurses from four neonatal intensive care units in Taiwan. Most participants agreed with suggesting a do not resuscitate (DNR) order to parents for dying neonates (86.5%). However, the majority agreed with talking to patients about DNR orders is difficult (76.9%). Most participants agree that review by the clinical ethics committee is needed before the recommendation of 'DNR' to parents (94.23%) and nurses were significantly more likely than physicians to agree to this (p=0.043). During the end-of-life care, most clinicians accepted to continue current treatment without adding others (70%) and withholding of emergency treatments (75%); however, active euthanasia, the administration of drug to end-of-life, was not considered acceptable by both physicians and nurses in this research (96%). Based on our research results, providing continuing educational training and a formal consulting service in moral courage for neonatal clinicians are needed. In Taiwan, neonatal physicians and nurses hold similar values and attitudes towards end-of-life decisions for neonates. In order to improve the clinicians' communication skills with parents about DNR options and to change clinicians' attitudes for providing enough pain-relief medicine to dying neonates, providing continuing educational training and a formal consulting service in moral courage are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Chi Huang
- School of Nursing, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Roscigno CI, Savage TA, Kavanaugh K, Moro TT, Kilpatrick SJ, Strassner HT, Grobman WA, Kimura RE. Divergent views of hope influencing communications between parents and hospital providers. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2012; 22:1232-1246. [PMID: 22745363 PMCID: PMC3572714 DOI: 10.1177/1049732312449210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
This study evaluated parents' and health care providers' (HCPs) descriptions of hope following counseling of parents at risk of delivering an extremely premature infant. Data came from a longitudinal multiple case study investigation that examined the decision making and support needs of 40 families and their providers. Semistructured interviews were conducted before and after delivery. Divergent viewpoints of hope were found between parents and many HCPs and were subsequently coded using content analysis. Parents relied on hope as an emotional motivator, whereas most HCPs described parents' notions of hope as out of touch with reality. Parents perceived that such divergent beliefs about the role of hope negatively shaped communicative interactions and reduced trust with some of their providers. A deeper understanding of how varying views of hope might shape communications will uncover future research questions and lead to theory-based interventions aimed at improving the process of discussing difficult news with parents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecelia I Roscigno
- University of North Carolina School of Nursing, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7460, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Peng NH, Liu HL, Chen CH, Bachman J. Cultural practices and end-of-life decision making in the neonatal intensive care unit in Taiwan. J Transcult Nurs 2012; 23:320-6. [PMID: 22477715 DOI: 10.1177/1043659612441019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to describe conditions of decision making for dying infants and cultural effects on the process of infant death in the neonatal intensive care unit. A retrospective chart review was used in this research. Fifty charts were reviewed; the major cause of death for the research subjects was complications of prematurity (52%). Eighty-two percent of the charts documented a do not resuscitate order, and 16% of parents allowed discontinuation of ventilator support when they realized the futility of continued care. In 30 nursing records, parents and their dying infants were offered a quiet place in which to grieve. In 10 cases, nurses accompanied these parents and allowed them to express their emotions. Research findings showed great outward expression of religion at the time of death. Various cultural issues affected both the grieving process of the families and the dying process of their infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niang-Huei Peng
- Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan, Republic of China.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Development of an informational web site for recruiting research participants: process, implementation, and evaluation. Comput Inform Nurs 2012; 29:544-51; quiz 552-3. [PMID: 21709545 DOI: 10.1097/ncn.0b013e318224b52f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Internet-based research is increasing, yet there is little known about recruitment approaches that target the Internet. Investigators have been slow to discuss how to plan, develop, and enhance recruitment using the Internet when well-concealed or disparate populations, sensitive topics, or qualitative methods are interspersed into the aims of the study. The twofold purpose of this article was to (1) highlight the major steps and strategies undertaken to develop and implement an innovative Web site for recruiting high-genetic-risk couples who were considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis use, and (2) present the recruitment results and lessons learned based on enrollment, self-evaluation, and descriptive data. The Web site was developed using a five-step process designed by the investigators. A significant step in the process was determining the Web site objectives, which were enacted through contextual and design decisions, and also by incorporating a brief video and study logo into the Web site. The recruitment results indicate that, of the 22 participant couples, ∼82% were recruited via the Internet versus traditional recruitment approaches (ie, clinics, newsletters) and that the majority of couples viewed the Web site prior to enrolling in the study. In conclusion, developing a Web site using the five-step process can facilitate recruitment.
Collapse
|
47
|
Goggin M. Parents perceptions of withdrawal of life support treatment to newborn infants. Early Hum Dev 2012; 88:79-82. [PMID: 22227449 DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2011] [Accepted: 12/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The decision to withdraw life support challenges health care professionals and parents. Parents need to fulfil their role as parents, part of which involves difficult decision making. They desire to fully understand the care of their infant in order to help in this process. Parents work to a different time frame than health care professionals and therefore require detailed information and support to make decisions. Available approaches to care need to address ethical decisions regarding treatment, pain and suffering, quality of life and decisions to move from active to palliative care. Communication requires an investment of time, repeated discussions and a compassionate approach by health care professionals to educate parents in order for them to make an informed decision. Follow-on care to help parents come to terms with the decisions they have made is a requirement of good practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Goggin
- St. George's Hospital, Blackshaw Road, London SW17 OQT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Danerek M, Maršál K, Cuttini M, Lingman G, Nilstun T, Dykes AK. Attitudes of Swedish midwives towards management of extremely preterm labour and birth. Midwifery 2011; 28:e857-64. [PMID: 22169524 DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2010] [Revised: 10/19/2011] [Accepted: 10/24/2011] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE the aim of the study was to ascertain the attitudes of Swedish midwives towards management of very preterm labour and birth and to compare the attitudes of midwives at university hospitals with those at general hospitals. DESIGN this cross-sectional descriptive and comparative study used an anonymous self-administrated questionnaire for data collection. Descriptive and analytic statistics were carried out for analysis. PARTICIPANTS the answers from midwives (n=259) were collected in a prospective SWEMID study. SETTING the midwives had experience of working on delivery wards in maternity units with neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Sweden. FINDINGS in the management of very preterm labour and birth, midwives agreed to initiate interventions concerning steroid prophylaxis at 23 gestational weeks (GW), caesarean section for preterm labour only at 25 GW, when to give information to the neonatologist before birth at 23 GW, and when to suggest transfer to NICU at 23 GW. Midwives at university hospitals were prone to start interventions at an earlier gestational age than the midwives at general hospitals. Midwives at university hospitals seemed to be more willing to disclose information to the parents. KEY CONCLUSIONS midwives with experience of handling very preterm births at 21-28 GW develop a positive attitude to interventions at an earlier gestational age as compared to midwives without such experience. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE based on these results we suggest more communication and transfer of information about the advances in perinatal care and exchange of knowledge between the staff at general and university hospitals. Establishment of platforms for inter-professional discussions about ethically difficult situations in perinatal care, might benefit the management of very preterm labour and birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaretha Danerek
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University Lund, Box 157, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Gallagher K, Marlow N, Edgley A, Porock D. The attitudes of neonatal nurses towards extremely preterm infants. J Adv Nurs 2011; 68:1768-79. [PMID: 22050609 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05865.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM The paper is a report of a study of the attitudes of neonatal nurses towards extremely preterm infants. BACKGROUND Alongside advancing survival at extremely preterm gestational ages, ethical debates concerning the provision of invasive care have proliferated in light of the high morbidity. Despite nurses being the healthcare professionals who work closest with the infant and their family, their potential influence is usually ignored when determining how parents come to decisions about future care for their extremely premature infant. METHODS A Q methodology was employed to explore the attitudes of neonatal nurses towards caring for extremely preterm infants. Data were collected between 2007 and 2008 and analysed using PQMethod and Card Content Analysis. RESULTS Thirty-six nurses from six neonatal units in the United Kingdom participated. Although there was consensus around the professional role of the nurse, when faced with the complexities of neonatal nursing three distinguishing factors emerged: the importance of parental choice in decision-making, the belief that technology should be used to assess response to treatment, and the belief that healthcare professionals should undertake difficult decisions. CONCLUSION Neonatal nurses report unexpected difficulties in upholding their professionally defined role through highly complex and ever varied decision-making processes. Recognition of individual attitudes to the care of extremely preterm infants and the role of the family in the face of difficult decisions should facilitate more open communication between the nurse and the parents and improve the experience of both the nurse and the family during these emotional situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Gallagher
- Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College London, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
de Vos MA, van der Heide A, Maurice-Stam H, Brouwer OF, Plötz FB, Schouten-van Meeteren AYN, Willems DL, Heymans HSA, Bos AP. The process of end-of-life decision-making in pediatrics: a national survey in the Netherlands. Pediatrics 2011; 127:e1004-12. [PMID: 21402634 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of this study was to investigate how Dutch pediatric specialists reach end-of-life decisions, how they involve parents, and how they address conflicts. METHODS We conducted a national cross-sectional survey among pediatric intensivists, oncologists, neurologists, neurosurgeons, and metabolic pediatricians practicing in the 8 Dutch university hospitals. We collected information on respondents' overall opinions and their clinical practice. RESULTS Of the 185 eligible pediatric specialists, 74% returned the questionnaire. All responding physicians generally discuss an end-of-life decision with colleagues before discussing it with parents. In half of the reported cases, respondents informed parents about the intended decision and asked their permission. In one-quarter of the cases, respondents informed parents without asking for their permission. In the remaining one-quarter of the cases, respondents advised parents and consequently allowed them to have the decisive voice. The chosen approach is highly influenced by type of decision and type and duration of treatment. Conflicts within medical teams arose as a result of uncertainties about prognosis and treatment options. Most conflicts with parents arose because parents had a more positive view of the prognosis or had religious objections to treatment discontinuation. All conflicts were eventually resolved by a combination of strategies. In 66% of all cases, pain and symptom management were intensified before the child's death. CONCLUSIONS Within Dutch pediatrics, end-of-life decisions are team decisions. Pediatric specialists differ considerably in how they involve parents in end-of-life decision-making, ranging from benevolent paternalism to parental autonomy. Main conflict-solving strategies are taking more time and extending discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam A de Vos
- Department of Pediatrics, Academic Medical Centre/Emma Children's Hospital, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|