Spanish Speaking, Limited English Proficient Parents whose Children are Hospitalized: An Integrative Review

A comparison of caregiver-reported snoring and objective snoring in children from urban neighborhoods

OBJECTIVE

Sleep Disordered Breathing (SDB) is both prevalent and under-recognized in pediatric minority populations. Recognition of SDB is often triggered by symptoms of caregiver-reported snoring. However, the validity and utility of caregiver reports likely vary across populations. Our objective is to assess the association between caregiver-reported snoring and objectively recorded snoring in a low-income urban community and explore factors associated with agreement between objective and subjective snoring.

METHODS

169 6 to 12 year old participants underwent at-home sleep studies with a WatchPAT device as part of the Environmental Assessment of Sleep in Youth (EASY) cohort study. Differences in subjective snoring, objective snoring, and concordance between subjective and objective snoring based on socioeconomic and clinical characteristics were assessed.

RESULTS

The sample had a high proportion of non-white (78.9 %) and low income (39.6 %) children. Caregivers reported snoring for 20.7 % of the children and snoring was measured objectively for 21.9 %. Of those with objective snoring, only 29.7 % were identified as snorers by caregiver report (sensitivity: 0.30; specificity: 0.82). Primary Spanish language and co-sleeping were associated with increased caregiver reported snoring, and allergy was associated with increased objective snoring. Older child age and normal range BMI percentile were associated with higher concordance between caregiver and objective snoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Among a community-based, predominantly minority sample, caregiver-reported snoring resulted in under-estimation of prevalence of objectively assessed snoring. Reliance on caregiver report may poorly identify children with snoring or SDB in clinical practice.

Pilot Testing Transcreated Spanish-Language Study Materials for Symptom Research With Infants and Parents in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Rising admission rates of Hispanic/Latinx families to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have increased the number of non-English-speaking individuals who may wish to participate in research studies. However, a lack of appropriately translated research study materials may limit the opportunity for these families to be involved in research that could impact the care that infants and families receive in the NICU.

PURPOSE

The primary purpose was to pilot test study materials that were transcreated from English to Spanish with the assistance of a bilingual community advisory board with Spanish-speaking parents of NICU infants.

METHODS

A total of 19 Spanish-speaking parents (15 mothers and 4 fathers) who were representative of the population of interest completed paper-and-pencil surveys, along with a cognitive interview. Preliminary data related to decision-making and goals of care, infant symptoms, and their experiences in the NICU were also collected.

RESULTS

The internal reliability of the transcreated study instruments ranged from good to excellent (α= 0.82-0.99). Participants reported that study materials were not offensive and did not make them feel uncomfortable; however, they found some words/phrases to be confusing. Parents had the opportunity to provide suggested wording changes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH

Language barriers and a lack of cultural responsiveness can affect the care that infants and their families receive. More accurate and culturally appropriate transcreation of study materials can remove barriers to research participation and facilitate better communication with non-English-speaking families, which may lead to the development of better-informed evidence-based interventions and clinical practices in the NICU.

A parental communication assessment initiative in the paediatric cardiovascular ICU

OBJECTIVE

Challenges to communication between families and care providers of paediatric patients in intensive care units (ICU) include variability of communication preferences, mismatched goals of care, and difficulties carrying forward family preferences from provider to provider. Our objectives were to develop and test an assessment tool that queries parents of children requiring cardiac intensive care about their communication preferences and to determine if this tool facilitates patient-centred care and improves families' ICU experience.

DESIGN

In this quality improvement initiative, a novel tool was developed, the Parental Communication Assessment (PCA), which asked parents with children hospitalised in the cardiac ICU about their communication preferences. Participants were prospectively randomised to the intervention group, which received the PCA, or to standard care. All participants completed a follow-up survey evaluating satisfaction with communication.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred thirteen participants enrolled and 56 were randomised to the intervention group. Participants who received the PCA preferred detail-oriented communication over big picture. Most parents understood the daily discussions on rounds (64%) and felt comfortable expressing concerns (68%). Eighty-six percent reported the PCA was worthwhile. Parents were generally satisfied with communication. However, an important proportion felt unprepared for difficult decisions or setbacks, inadequately included or supported in decision-making, and that they lacked control over their child's care. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in their communication satisfaction results.

CONCLUSIONS

Parents with children hospitalised in the paediatric ICU demonstrated diverse communication preferences. Most participants felt overall satisfied with communication, but individualising communication with patients' families according to their preferences may improve their experience.

Disparities in Postoperative Communication Patterns Among Spanish-speaking Pediatric Patients with Hydrocephalus

OBJECTIVE

To determine if differences exist in postoperative communication patterns or healthcare use among English-speaking patients (ESPs) and Spanish-speaking patients (SSPs) with childhood hydrocephalus.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Through simple random sampling, 50 ESPs and 50 SSPs (<18 years old) who underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy were identified. Demographics, communication with clinic (eg, number of calls or messages postoperatively), and healthcare use were collected. Multiple linear regressions assessed the significance of predictors on communication frequency and use.

RESULTS

SSPs were more likely to have a comorbidity and ventriculoperitoneal shunt than ESPs. SSPs had longer median postoperative length of stay (P < .01) and 30-day readmission rate (P < .01) than ESPs. Only 18% of SSPs communicated with clinic; 11 total calls or messages were from SSPs vs 57 from ESPs (P < .01). The most common reason for outreach among both cohorts was a new symptom. ESP outreach most frequently resulted in reassurance or medical course changes on an outpatient basis (30% ESPs vs 0% SSPs; P = .04), whereas SSP outreach most frequently resulted in guidance to present to the emergency department (3% ESPs vs 36% SSPs; P < .01). Language remained a significant predictor for number of calls or messages, even after adjusting for comorbidity, operation type, and insurance (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having more complex disease, only 18% of SSPs communicated with the neurosurgical team postoperatively and were more frequently sent to the emergency department for management. Future research will explore communication barriers and preferences to ensure postoperative care is timely and patient centered.

Spanish-Speaking Caregivers' Perception of Emergency Physicians' Interpersonal and Communication Skills in a Pediatric Emergency Department

OBJECTIVES

Medical communication is more than just the delivery of information; language differences between physicians and patients/caregivers create a challenge to providing effective care in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Overcoming this barrier is vital to providing high-quality care. We evaluated Spanish- versus English-speaking caregivers' perception of their pediatric ED physicians' interpersonal and communication skills. We also compared perceptions of Spanish- versus English-speaking caregivers who self-identified as Hispanic.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of data from surveys administered in an urban, free-standing children's hospital ED. Surveys were administered in English and Spanish to pediatric patient caregivers. In person, video, and telephonic interpretations were available during patient encounters.

RESULTS

There were 2542 (82.4%) surveys completed in English and 543 (17.6%) in Spanish. There were significant differences in demographic data of English versus Spanish survey respondents, including level of education, insurance status, and rates of nonpublic insurance. Spanish survey respondents rated their physicians' interpersonal skills lower than English survey respondents. There were 1455 (47%) surveys completed by the respondents who self-identified as Hispanic. Within this group, 928 (63.8%) respondents completed the survey in English and 527 (36.2%) in Spanish. Among this Hispanic population, the Spanish survey respondents rated their physicians' interpersonal and communication skills lower than English survey respondents. After adjusting for education level and insurance type, these differences persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

Language barriers have a meaningful impact on physician ability to communicate effectively in the pediatric ED. Improving physicians' ability to overcome this barrier is essential toward enriching patient outcomes and experience in the ED.

Relationship between parents' health literacy and child health: systematic review

Purpose

Parents' health literacy is an important element to ensure the sound health of children. One of the major purposes of this study was to systematically collect and review the literature that identified the relationship between two variables: parents' health literacy and their child's health.

Design/methodology/approach

To meet the purpose, the authors searched four well-reputed research databases such as Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and LISTA (Library, Information Science and Technology Abstracts) comprehensively to collect the relevant research on the topic. Except for books, various types of content from different years were used for this review. The investigators used Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines to select eligible studies for this review. The authors also assessed the quality of the reviewed research in the light of well-reputed quality guidelines shared by Boynton and Greenhalgh (2004).

Findings

The majority of the reviewed studies found a statistically significant relationship between parents' health literacy and the health of their children. Findings also identified that the majority of the reviewed literature scored from 9 to 12 on the quality assessment criteria. Results also highlighted that the majority of the reviewed research on parents' health literacy and child health has been conducted in the USA and utilized quantitative methods to conduct research on the topic under this study.

Research limitations/implications

This systematic review has multiple theoretical and practical implications for parents, policymakers and researchers.

Originality/value

This is the first systematically collected and reviewed paper on the relationship between parents' health literacy and child health.

How do Central American Parents in the United States View the Importance of and Obtain Information About Behaviors Associated with the Risk of Early Childhood Obesity?

Background: Data suggest that Latinx preschool-age children are at increased risk of obesity. The fastest-growing Latinx population in the United States originates from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, also known as the Northern Triangle countries. Purpose: To describe how Central American parents from the Northern Triangle countries perceive the importance of energy balance-related behaviors (EBRBs), their preferred sources to obtain information about EBRBs, and to assess whether these differ by parent's gender and country of the nativity. Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Results: Seventy-four parents with at least one child between 2 and 5 years of age participated in the study. More than half were immigrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras and were classified as having low acculturation. Mothers perceived consuming >5 fruits and vegetables daily, limiting sugar-sweetened beverages consumption, and having <2 hours daily screen time as extremely important, whereas fathers perceived these behaviors as being less important. Although a higher proportion of foreign-born than US-born parents perceived most of the assessed EBRBs (4 out of 6) as extremely important, these differences were not significant. Parents reported multiple sources to obtain EBRB-related information. Direct person-to-person interactions were the most commonly preferred sources, with pediatricians being the top source (97.3%), followed by other parents (86.5%), and WIC professionals (74.3%). Pediatricians were the preferred source to obtain information about EBRBs, irrespective of parent's gender and country of the nativity. A higher proportion of US-born than foreign-born parents reported a preference to obtain EBRB-related information from other parents. Conclusions: Findings suggest the significance of understanding how Central American parents perceive the importance of EBRBs and the sources they would prefer to obtain information for their children's EBRBs. Study findings have implications for health education and obesity prevention interventions designed to reach and deliver key evidence-based child health information to Central American parents from the Northern Triangle countries in the United States.

Facilitating Engagement on Family-Centered Rounds for Families With Limited Comfort With English

OBJECTIVE

Conducting family-centered rounds (FCR) for families with limited comfort with English (LCE) presents communication challenges. The objective of this study was to characterize the preferences of Spanish-speaking parents with LCE around interpretation and communication with the medical team during FCR to promote family engagement during rounds.

METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted at a tertiary care children's hospital in New York, New York. Eighteen Spanish-speaking parents of patients admitted to the hospital medicine service participated. Bilingual investigators conducted semistructured interviews over a secure virtual platform. Interview transcriptions were coded and analyzed by using a grounded theory approach and constant comparative method. Parents were recruited until thematic saturation was achieved.

RESULTS

Most participants were mothers (72%) from the Dominican Republic (61%). Responses from participants yielded a conceptual model depicting parents' perspectives on family engagement and bidirectional communication during FCR. Three major themes emerged: (1) importance of interpreter use, (2) understanding of medical information, and (3) participation in FCR. Within each theme, factors that facilitate or impede engagement in FCR were identified. Interpreters facilitated information sharing and parent understanding of medical care, increasing parent appreciation of FCR. Lack of language-concordant care and parents' perceived responsibility for the language barrier limited engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Families with LCE value involvement during FCR, but face difficulties due to language barriers. Providers can support these families by empowering families' participation and by consistently using an interpreter. Understanding the preferences of families with LCE for participation in FCR will help providers deliver more equitable family-centered care.