Low-dose adrenomedullin-2/intermedin(8-47) reduces pulmonary ischemia/reperfusion injury

Variable CGRP family peptide signaling durations and the structural determinants thereof

Calcitonin gene-related peptides alpha and beta (αCGRP, βCGRP), adrenomedullin (AM), and adrenomedullin 2/intermedin (AM2/IMD) function in pain signaling, neuroimmune communication, and regulation of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems by activating either of two class B GPCRs, CLR and CTR, in complex with a RAMP1, -2, or -3 modulatory subunit. Inspired by our recent discovery that AM2/IMD(1-47) activation of CLR-RAMP3 elicits long duration cAMP signaling, here we used a live-cell cAMP biosensor assay to characterize the signaling kinetics of the two CGRP peptides and several bioactive AM and AM2/IMD fragments with variable N-terminal extensions. Remarkably, AM2/IMD(8-47) and AM2/IMD-53 exhibited even longer duration signaling than the 1-47 fragment. AM2/IMD(8-47) was a striking 8-fold longer acting than AM(13-52) at CLR-RAMP3. In contrast, the N-terminal extension of AM had no effect on signaling duration. AM(1-52) and (13-52) were equally short-acting. Analysis of AM2/IMD-AM mid-region chimeras and AM2/IMD R23 and R33 point mutants showed the importance of these residues for long-duration signaling and identified AM2/IMD peptides that exhibited up to 17-fold diminished signaling duration at CLR-RAMP3, while retaining near wildtype signaling potencies. βCGRP was ∼ 3-fold longer acting than αCGRP at the CGRP (CLR-RAMP1) and the amylin1 (CTR-RAMP1) receptors. Chimeric CGRP peptides showed that the single residue difference near the N-terminus, and the two differences in the mid-region, equally contributed to the longer duration of βCGRP signaling. This work uncovers key temporal differences in cAMP signaling among the CGRP family peptides, elucidates the structural bases thereof, and provides pharmacological tools for studying long-duration AM2/IMD signaling.

Control of myeloid cell functions by nociceptors

The immune system has evolved to protect the host from infectious agents, parasites, and tumor growth, and to ensure the maintenance of homeostasis. Similarly, the primary function of the somatosensory branch of the peripheral nervous system is to collect and interpret sensory information about the environment, allowing the organism to react to or avoid situations that could otherwise have deleterious effects. Consequently, a teleological argument can be made that it is of advantage for the two systems to cooperate and form an “integrated defense system” that benefits from the unique strengths of both subsystems. Indeed, nociceptors, sensory neurons that detect noxious stimuli and elicit the sensation of pain or itch, exhibit potent immunomodulatory capabilities. Depending on the context and the cellular identity of their communication partners, nociceptors can play both pro- or anti-inflammatory roles, promote tissue repair or aggravate inflammatory damage, improve resistance to pathogens or impair their clearance. In light of such variability, it is not surprising that the full extent of interactions between nociceptors and the immune system remains to be established. Nonetheless, the field of peripheral neuroimmunology is advancing at a rapid pace, and general rules that appear to govern the outcomes of such neuroimmune interactions are beginning to emerge. Thus, in this review, we summarize our current understanding of the interaction between nociceptors and, specifically, the myeloid cells of the innate immune system, while pointing out some of the outstanding questions and unresolved controversies in the field. We focus on such interactions within the densely innervated barrier tissues, which can serve as points of entry for infectious agents and, where known, highlight the molecular mechanisms underlying these interactions.

Development of chimeric and bifunctional antagonists for CLR/RAMP receptors

CGRP, adrenomedullin (ADM), and adrenomedullin 2 (ADM2) family peptides are important neuropeptides and hormones for the regulation of neurotransmission, vasotone, cardiovascular morphogenesis, vascular integrity, and feto‒placental development. These peptides signal through CLR/RAMP1, 2 and 3 receptor complexes. CLR/RAMP1, or CGRP receptor, antagonists have been developed for the treatment of migraine headache and osteoarthritis pain; whereas CLR/RAMP2, or ADM receptor, antagonists are being developed for the treatment of tumor growth/metastasis. Based on the finding that an acylated chimeric ADM/ADM2 analog potently stimulates CLR/RAMP1 and 2 signaling, we hypothesized that the binding domain of this analog could have potent inhibitory activity on CLR/RAMP receptors. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that acylated truncated ADM/ADM2 analogs of 27–31 residues exhibit potent antagonistic activity toward CLR/RAMP1 and 2. On the other hand, nonacylated analogs have minimal activity. Further truncation at the junctional region of these chimeric analogs led to the generation of CLR/RAMP1-selective antagonists. A 17-amino-acid analog (Antagonist 2–4) showed 100-fold selectivity for CLR/RAMP1 and was >100-fold more potent than the classic CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP8-37. In addition, we showed (1) a lysine residue in the Antagonist 2–4 is important for enhancing the antagonistic activity, (2) an analog consisted of an ADM sequence motif and a 12-amino-acid binding domain of CGRP exhibits potent CLR/RAMP1-inhibitory activity, and (3) a chimeric analog consisted of a somatostatin analog and an ADM antagonist exhibits dual activities on somatostatin and CLR/RAMP receptors. Because the blockage of CLR/RAMP signaling prevents migraine pain and suppresses tumor growth/metastasis, further studies of these analogs, which presumably have better access to the tumor microenvironment and nerve endings at the trigeminal ganglion and synovial joints as compared to antibody-based therapies, may lead to the development of better anti-CGRP therapy and alternative antiangiogenesis therapy. Likewise, the use of bifunctional somatostatin-ADM antagonist analogs could be a promising strategy for the treatment of high-grade neuroendocrine tumors by targeting an antiangiogenesis agent to the neuroendocrine tumor microenvironment.

Structure-function analyses reveal a triple β-turn receptor-bound conformation of adrenomedullin 2/intermedin and enable peptide antagonist design

The cardioprotective vasodilator peptide adrenomedullin 2/intermedin (AM2/IMD) and the related adrenomedullin (AM) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signal through three heterodimeric receptors comprising the calcitonin receptor-like class B G protein-coupled receptor (CLR) and a variable receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP1, -2, or -3) that determines ligand selectivity. The CGRP receptor (RAMP1:CLR) favors CGRP binding, whereas the AM₁ (RAMP2:CLR) and AM₂ (RAMP3:CLR) receptors favor AM binding. How AM2/IMD binds the receptors and how RAMPs modulate its binding is unknown. Here, we show that AM2/IMD binds the three purified RAMP-CLR extracellular domain (ECD) complexes with a selectivity profile that is distinct from those of CGRP and AM. AM2/IMD bound all three ECD complexes but preferred the CGRP and AM₂ receptor complexes. A 2.05 Å resolution crystal structure of an AM2/IMD antagonist fragment-bound RAMP1-CLR ECD complex revealed that AM2/IMD binds the complex through a unique triple β-turn conformation that was confirmed by peptide and receptor mutagenesis. Comparisons of the receptor-bound conformations of AM2/IMD, AM, and a high-affinity CGRP analog revealed differences that may have implications for biased signaling. Guided by the structure, enhanced-affinity AM2/IMD antagonist variants were developed, including one that discriminates the AM₁ and AM₂ receptors with ∼40-fold difference in affinities and one stabilized by an intramolecular disulfide bond. These results reveal differences in how the three peptides engage the receptors, inform development of AM2/IMD-based pharmacological tools and therapeutics, and provide insights into RAMP modulation of receptor pharmacology.

Normal and Cystic Fibrosis Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells Infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Exhibit Distinct Gene Activation Patterns

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

In cystic fibrosis (CF), Pseudomonas aeruginosa is not eradicated from the lower respiratory tract and is associated with epithelial inflammation that eventually causes tissue damage. To identify the molecular determinants of an effective response to P. aeruginosa infection, we performed a transcriptomic analysis of primary human bronchial epithelial cells from healthy donors (CTRL) 2, 4, and 6 h after induced P. aeruginosa infection. Compared to noninfected cells, infected cells showed changes in gene activity, which were most marked 6 h postinfection and usually consisted in upregulation.

RESULTS

By comparing for each time point of infection, the transcriptomic response of epithelial cells from CF patients and healthy donors, we identified 851, 638, 667, and 980 differentially expressed genes 0, 2, 4, and 6 h postinfection, respectively. Gene selection followed by bioinformatic analysis showed that most of the differentially expressed genes, either up- or downregulated, were in the protein-binding and catalytic gene-ontology categories. Finally, we established that the protein products of the genes exhibiting the greatest differential upregulation (CSF2, CCL2, TNF, CSF3, MMP1, and MMP10) between CF patients and CTRL were produced in higher amounts by infected cells from CF patients versus CTRL.

CONCLUSIONS

The differentially expressed genes in CF patients may constitute a signature for a detrimental inflammatory response and for an inefficient P. aeruginosa host-cell response.