Intrafraction pancreatic tumor motion patterns during ungated magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy with an abdominal corset

Integrating Deep Learning-Based Dose Distribution Prediction with Bayesian Networks for Decision Support in Radiotherapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer

PURPOSE

Selecting the better techniques to harbor optimal motion management, either a stereotactic linear accelerator delivery using TrueBeam (TBX) or magnetic resonance-guided gated delivery using MRIdian (MRG), is time-consuming and costly. To address this challenge, we aimed to develop a decision-supporting algorithm based on a combination of deep learning-generated dose distributions and clinical data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with liver or pancreatic cancer who underwent both TBX and MRG simulations and planning process. We trained three-dimensional U-Net deep learning models to predict dose distributions and generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) for each system. We integrated predicted DVH metrics into a Bayesian network (BN) model incorporating clinical data.

RESULTS

The MRG prediction model outperformed the TBX model, demonstrating statistically significant superiorities in predicting normalized dose to the planning target volume (PTV) and liver. We developed a final BN prediction model integrating the predictive DVH metrics with patient factors like age, PTV size, and tumor location. This BN model an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve index of 83.56%. The decision tree derived from the BN model showed that the tumor location (abutting vs. apart of PTV to hollow viscus organs) was the most important factor to determine TBX or MRG. It provided a potential framework for selecting the optimal radiation therapy (RT) system based on individual patient characteristics.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a decision-supporting algorithm for selecting optimal RT plans in upper gastrointestinal cancers, incorporating both deep learning-based dose prediction and BN-based treatment selection. This approach might streamline the decision-making process, saving resources and improving treatment outcomes for patients undergoing RT.

A systematic review of the impact of abdominal compression and breath-hold techniques on motion, inter-fraction set-up errors, and intra-fraction errors in patients with hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reducing motion is vital when radiotherapy is used to treat patients with hepatobiliary (HPB) and pancreatic malignancies. Abdominal compression (AC) and breath-hold (BH) techniques aim to minimise respiratory motion, yet their adoption remains limited, and practices vary. This review examines the impact of AC and BH on motion, set-up errors, and patient tolerability in HPB and pancreatic patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review, conducted using PRISMA and PICOS criteria, includes publications from January 2015 to February 2023. Eligible studies focused on AC and BH interventions in adults with HPB and pancreatic malignancies. Endpoints examined motion, set-up errors, intra-fraction errors, and patient tolerability. Due to study heterogeneity, Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis was used, and a 5 mm threshold assessed the impact of motion mitigation.

RESULTS

In forty studies, 14 explored AC and 26 BH, with 20 on HPB, 13 on pancreatic, and 7 on mixed cohorts. Six studied pre-treatment, 22 inter/intra-fraction errors, and 12 both. Six AC pre-treatment studies showed > 5 mm motion, and 4 BH and 2 AC studies reported > 5 mm inter-fraction errors. Compression studies commonly investigated the arch and belt, and DIBH was the predominant BH technique. No studies compared AC and BH. There was variation in the techniques, and several studies did not follow standardised error reporting. Patient experience and tolerability were under-reported.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that AC effectively reduces motion, but its effectiveness may vary between patients. BH can immobilise motion; however, it can be inconsistent between fractions. The review underscores the need for larger, standardised studies and emphasizes the importance of considering the patient's perspective for tailored treatments.

Daily Diagnostic Quality Computed Tomography-on-Rails (CTOR) Image Guidance for Abdominal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT)

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for abdominal targets faces a variety of challenges, including motion caused by the respiration and digestion and a relatively poor level of contrast between the tumor and the surrounding tissues. Breath-hold treatments with computed tomography-on-rails (CTOR) image guidance is one way of addressing these challenges, allowing for both the tumor and normal tissues to be well-visualized. Using isodose lines (IDLs) from CT simulations as a guide, the anatomical information can be used to shift the alignment or trigger a replan, such that normal tissues receive acceptable doses of radiation.

METHODS

This study aims to describe the workflow involved when using CTOR for pancreas and liver SBRT and demonstrates its effectiveness through several case studies.

RESULTS

In these case studies, using the anatomical information gained through diagnostic-quality CT guidance to make slight adjustments to the alignment, resulted in reductions in the maximum dose to the stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality imaging, such as CTOR, and the use of IDLs to estimate the doses to OARs, enable the safe delivery of SBRT, without the added complexity and resource commitment required by daily online adaptive planning.

Intrafraction motion and impact of margin reduction for MR-Linac online adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer treatments

INTRODUCTION

Online adaptive radiotherapy is well suited for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in pancreatic cancer due to considerable intrafractional tumour motion. This study aimed to assess intrafraction motion and generate adjusted planning target volume (PTV) margins required for online adaptive radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer treatment using abdominal compression on the magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MR-Linac).

METHODS

Motion monitoring images obtained from 67 fractions for 15 previously treated pancreatic cancer patients were analysed. All patients received SABR (50 Gy in five fractions) on the MR-Linac using abdominal compression. The analysis included quantification of intrafraction motion, leading to the development of adjusted PTV margins. The dosimetric impact of implementing the adjusted PTV was then evaluated in a cohort of 20 patients.

RESULTS

Intrafraction motion indicated an average target displacement of 1-3 mm, resulting in an adjusted PTV margin of 2 mm in the right-left and superior-inferior directions, and 3 mm in the anterior-posterior direction. Plans incorporating these adjusted margins consistently demonstrated improved dose to target volumes, with improvements averaging 1.5 Gy in CTV D99%, 4.9 Gy in PTV D99% and 1.2 Gy in PTV-high D90%, and better sparing of the organs at risk (OAR).

CONCLUSIONS

The improved target volume coverage and reduced OAR dose suggest potential for reducing current clinical margins for MR-Linac treatment. However, it is important to note that decreasing margins may reduce safeguards against geographical misses. Nonetheless, the continued integration of gating systems on MR-Linacs could provide confidence in adopting reduced margins.

Gating and intrafraction drift correction on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: Clinical dosimetric benefits for upper abdominal tumors

This work reports on the first seven patients treated with gating and baseline drift correction on the high-field MR-Linac system. Dosimetric analysis showed that the active motion management system improved congruence to the planned dose, efficiently mitigating detrimental effects of intrafraction motion in the upper abdomen.

Online Adaptive MRI-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Pancreatic and Other Intra-Abdominal Cancers

A 1.5T MRI combined with a linear accelerator (Unity®, Elekta; Stockholm, Sweden) is a device that shows promise in MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). Previous studies utilized the manufacturer's pre-set MRI sequences (i.e., T2 Weighted (T2W)), which limited the visualization of pancreatic and intra-abdominal tumors and organs at risk (OAR). Here, a T1 Weighted (T1W) sequence was utilized to improve the visualization of tumors and OAR for online adapted-to-position (ATP) and adapted-to-shape (ATS) during MRI-guided SBRT. Twenty-six patients, 19 with pancreatic and 7 with intra-abdominal cancers, underwent CT and MRI simulations for SBRT planning before being treated with multi-fractionated MRI-guided SBRT. The boundary of tumors and OAR was more clearly seen on T1W image sets, resulting in fast and accurate contouring during online ATP/ATS planning. Plan quality in 26 patients was dependent on OAR proximity to the target tumor and achieved 96 ± 5% and 92 ± 9% in gross tumor volume D90% and planning target volume D90%. We utilized T1W imaging (about 120 s) to shorten imaging time by 67% compared to T2W imaging (about 360 s) and improve tumor visualization, minimizing target/OAR delineation uncertainty and the treatment margin for sparing OAR. The average time-consumption of MRI-guided SBRT for the first 21 patients was 55 ± 15 min for ATP and 79 ± 20 min for ATS.

Impact of abdominal compression on intra-fractional motion and delivered dose in magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases

PURPOSE

The current study investigated the impact of abdominal compression on motion and the delivered dose during non-gated, magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiation ablation of adrenal gland metastases.

METHODS

Thirty-one patients with adrenal gland metastases treated to 45-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions on a 1.5 T MRI-linac were included in the study. The patients were breathing freely (n = 14) or with motion restricted by using an abdominal compression belt (n = 17). The time-resolved position of the target in online 2D cine MR images acquired during treatment was assessed and used to estimate the dose delivered to the GTV and abutting luminal organs at risk (OAR).

RESULTS

The median (range) 3D root-mean-square target position error was significantly higher in patients treated without a compression belt [2.9 (1.9-5.6) mm] compared to patients using the belt [2.1 (1.2-3.5) mm] (P < 0.01). The median (range) GTV V95% was significantly reduced from planned 98.6 (65.9-100) % to delivered 96.5 (64.5-99.9) % due to motion (P < 0.01). Most prominent dose reductions were found in patients showing either large target drift or respiration motion and were mainly treated without abdominal compression. Motion did not lead to an increased number of constraint violations for luminal OAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable target coverage and dose to OAR was observed in the vast majority of patients despite intra-fractional motion during adaptive MRI-guided radiation ablation. The use of abdominal compression significantly reduced the target position error and prevented the most prominent target coverage degradations and is, therefore, recommended as motion management at MRI-linacs.

Feasibility of online radial magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive radiotherapy of pancreatic tumors

Background and purpose

Online adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided treatment planning for pancreatic tumors on 1.5T systems typically employs Cartesian 3D T ₂w magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main disadvantage of this sequence is that respiratory motion results in substantial blurring in the abdomen, which can hamper delineation accuracy. This study investigated the use of two motion-robust radial MRI sequences as main delineation scan for pancreatic MR-guided radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

Twelve patients with pancreatic tumors were imaged with a 3D T ₂w scan, a Periodically Rotated Overlapping ParallEL Lines with Enhanced Reconstruction (PROPELLER) scan (partially overlapping strips), and a 3D Vane scan (stack-of-stars), on a 1.5T MR-Linac under abdominal compression. The scans were assessed by three radiation oncologists for their suitability for online adaptive delineation. A quantitative comparison was made for gradient entropy and the effect of motion on apparent target position.

Results

The PROPELLER scans were selected as first preference in 56% of the cases, the 3D T ₂w in 42% and the 3D Vane in 3%. PROPELLER scans sometimes contained a large interslice variation which would have compromised delineation. Gradient entropy was significantly higher in 3D T ₂w patient scans. The apparent target position was more sensitive to motion amplitude in the PROPELLER scans, but substantial offsets did not occur under 10 mm peak-to-peak.

Conclusion

PROPELLER MRI may be a superior imaging sequence for pancreatic MRgRT compared to standard Cartesian sequences. The large interslice variation should be mitigated through further sequence optimization before PROPELLER can be adopted for online treatment adaptation.

Real-time motion monitoring using orthogonal cine MRI during MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy for abdominal tumors on 1.5T MR-Linac

BACKGROUND

Real-time motion monitoring (RTMM) is necessary for accurate motion management of intrafraction motions during radiation therapy (RT).

PURPOSE

Building upon a previous study, this work develops and tests an improved RTMM technique based on real-time orthogonal cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquired during magnetic resonance-guided adaptive RT (MRgART) for abdominal tumors on MR-Linac.

METHODS

A motion monitoring research package (MMRP) was developed and tested for RTMM based on template rigid registration between beam-on real-time orthogonal cine MRI and pre-beam daily reference 3D-MRI (baseline). The MRI data acquired under free-breathing during the routine MRgART on a 1.5T MR-Linac for 18 patients with abdominal malignancies of 8 liver, 4 adrenal glands (renal fossa), and 6 pancreas cases were used to evaluate the MMRP package. For each patient, a 3D mid-position image derived from an in-house daily 4D-MRI was used to define a target mask or a surrogate sub-region encompassing the target. Additionally, an exploratory case reviewed for an MRI dataset of a healthy volunteer acquired under both free-breathing and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) was used to test how effectively the RTMM using the MMRP can address through-plane motion (TPM). For all cases, the 2D T2/T1-weighted cine MRIs were captured with a temporal resolution of 200 ms interleaved between coronal and sagittal orientations. Manually delineated contours on the cine frames were used as the ground-truth motion. Common visible vessels and segments of target boundaries in proximity to the target were used as anatomical landmarks for reproducible delineations on both the 3D and the cine MRI images. Standard deviation of the error (SDE) between the ground-truth and the measured target motion from the MMRP package were analyzed to evaluate the RTMM accuracy. The maximum target motion (MTM) was measured on the 4D-MRI for all cases during free-breathing.

RESULTS

The mean (range) centroid motions for the 13 abdominal tumor cases were 7.69 (4.71-11.15), 1.73 (0.81-3.05), and 2.71 (1.45-3.93) mm with an overall accuracy of <2 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), the left-right (LR), and the anterior-posterior (AP) directions, respectively. The mean (range) of the MTM from the 4D-MRI was 7.38 (2-11) mm in the SI direction, smaller than the monitored motion of centroid, demonstrating the importance of the real-time motion capture. For the remaining patient cases, the ground-truth delineation was challenging under free-breathing due to the target deformation and the large TPM in the AP direction, the implant-induced image artifacts, and/or the suboptimal image plane selection. These cases were evaluated based on visual assessment. For the healthy volunteer, the TPM of the target was significant under free-breathing which degraded the RTMM accuracy. RTMM accuracy of <2 mm was achieved under DIBH, indicating DIBH is an effective method to address large TPM.

CONCLUSIONS

We have successfully developed and tested the use of a template-based registration method for an accurate RTMM of abdominal targets during MRgART on a 1.5T MR-Linac without using injected contrast agents or radio-opaque implants. DIBH may be used to effectively reduce or eliminate TPM of abdominal targets during RTMM.

Feasibility of delivered dose reconstruction for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors with fast, real-time 3D cine MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic cancer, intrafraction motion is typically monitored with (interleaved) 2D cine MRI. However, tumor surroundings are often not fully captured in these images, and motion might be distorted by through-plane movement. In this study, the feasibility of highly accelerated 3D cine MRI to reconstruct the delivered dose during MR-guided SBRT was assessed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3D cine MRI sequence was developed for fast, time-resolved 4D imaging, featuring a low spatial resolution that allows for rapid volumetric imaging at 430 ms. The 3D cines were acquired during the entire beam-on time of 23 fractions of online adaptive MR-guided SBRT for pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A 3D deformation vector field (DVF) was extracted for every cine dynamic using deformable image registration. Next, these DVFs were used to warp the partial dose delivered in the time interval between consecutive cine acquisitions. The warped dose plans were summed to obtain a total delivered dose. The delivered dose was also calculated under various motion correction strategies. Key DVH parameters of the GTV, duodenum, small bowel and stomach were extracted from the delivered dose and compared to the planned dose. The uncertainty of the calculated DVFs was determined with the inverse consistency error (ICE) in the high-dose regions.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) relative (ratio delivered/planned) D_99% of the GTV was 0.94 (0.06), and the mean (SD) relative D_0.5cc of the duodenum, small bowel, and stomach were respectively 0.98 (0.04), 1.00 (0.07), and 0.98 (0.06). In the fractions with the lowest delivered tumor coverage, it was found that significant lateral drifts had occurred. The DVFs used for dose warping had a low uncertainty with a mean (SD) ICE of 0.65 (0.07) mm.

CONCLUSION

We employed a fast, real-time 3D cine MRI sequence for dose reconstruction in the upper abdomen, and demonstrated that accurate DVFs, acquired directly from these images, can be used for dose warping. The reconstructed delivered dose showed only a modest degradation of tumor coverage, mostly attainable to baseline drifts. This emphasizes the need for motion monitoring and development of intrafraction treatment adaptation solutions, such as baseline drift corrections.

Evaluation of short-term gastrointestinal motion and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer

Background

The aim of this study is to quantify the short-term motion of the gastrointestinal tract (GI-tract) and its impact on dosimetric parameters in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The analyzed patients were eleven pancreatic cancer patients treated with SBRT or proton beam therapy. To ensure a fair analysis, the simulation SBRT plan was generated on the planning CT in all patients with the dose prescription of 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The GI-tract motion (stomach, duodenum, small and large intestine) was evaluated using three CT images scanned at spontaneous expiration. After fiducial-based rigid image registration, the contours in each CT image were generated and transferred to the planning CT, then the organ motion was evaluated. Planning at risk volumes (PRV) of each GI-tract were generated by adding 5 mm margins, and the volume receiving at least 33 Gy (V₃₃) < 0.5 cm³ was evaluated as the dose constraint.

Results

The median interval between the first and last CT scans was 736 s (interquartile range, IQR:624-986). To compensate for the GI-tract motion based on the planning CT, the necessary median margin was 8.0 mm (IQR: 8.0-10.0) for the duodenum and 14.0 mm (12.0-16.0) for the small intestine. Compared to the planned V₃₃ with the worst case, the median V₃₃ in the PRV of the duodenum significantly increased from 0.20 cm³ (IQR: 0.02-0.26) to 0.33 cm³ (0.10-0.59) at Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p = 0.031).

Conclusion

The short-term motions of the GI-tract lead to high dose differences.

Dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion under abdominal compression during MR-guided SBRT for (Peri-) pancreatic tumors

Objective. Intrafraction motion is a major concern for the safety and effectiveness of high dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the upper abdomen. In this study, the impact of the intrafraction motion on the delivered dose was assessed in a patient group that underwent MR-guided radiotherapy for upper abdominal malignancies with an abdominal corset. Approach. Fast online 2D cine MRI was used to extract tumor motion during beam-on time. These tumor motion profiles were combined with linac log files to reconstruct the delivered dose in 89 fractions of MR-guided SBRT in twenty patients. Aside the measured tumor motion, motion profiles were also simulated for a wide range of respiratory amplitudes and drifts, and their subsequent dosimetric impact was calculated in every fraction. Main results. The average (SD) D 99% of the gross tumor volume (GTV), relative to the planned D 99%, was 0.98 (0.03). The average (SD) relative D 0.5cc of the duodenum, small bowel and stomach was 0.99 (0.03), 1.00 (0.03), and 0.97 (0.05), respectively. No correlation of respiratory amplitude with dosimetric impact was observed. Fractions with larger baseline drifts generally led to a larger uncertainty of dosimetric impact on the GTV and organs at risk (OAR). The simulations yielded that the delivered dose is highly dependent on the direction of on baseline drift. Especially in anatomies where the OARs are closely abutting the GTV, even modest LR or AP drifts can lead to substantial deviations from the planned dose. Significance. The vast majority of the fractions was only modestly impacted by intrafraction motion, increasing our confidence that MR-guided SBRT with abdominal compression can be safely executed for patients with abdominal tumors, without the use of gating or tracking strategies.