Hospital-based intensive monitoring of antibiotic-induced adverse events in a university hospital

"Antimicrobial utilization in a paediatric intensive care unit in India: A step towards strengthening antimicrobial stewardship practices"

Antimicrobials are frequently used in critically ill children admitted to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). The antimicrobial use data from Indian PICUs is limited using standard metrics such as Days of therapy (DOT). This study aimed to determine the baseline trend of antimicrobial use in PICU of a tertiary care teaching hospital of Raipur district of Chhattisgarh, India using standard metrics with the goal of developing facility-wide antibiotic policy and strengthening the antimicrobial stewardship activities. This active surveillance was conducted over a period of 18 months, from November 1, 2019, to March 21, 2021, in patients aged one month to 14 years who were admitted for ≥ 48 hours to the PICU at a tertiary care teaching hospital of Raipur District. Data on patient characteristics, antimicrobial indications, antimicrobial prescription information, and clinical outcomes were collected using pre-designed data abstraction forms. The descriptive statistic was used to represent the results. The antimicrobial consumption was analyzed according to the WHO AWaRe Class (Access, Watch, and Reserve groups) of antibiotics. The antimicrobial consumption was expressed as DOT/1000 patient-days (PD). A total of 216 patients were surveyed during the study period. The average number of antimicrobials prescribed per hospitalisation was 2.60 (range: 1-12), with 97.22% administered via parenteral route. Overall, DOT/1000-PD was 1318. The consumption of Watch Group antimicrobials was highest with 949 DOT/1000-PD, followed by Access (215) and Reserve Group (154), respectively. Ceftriaxone (208 DOT/1000 PD) was the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial agent, followed by Vancomycin (201), Meropenem (175), Piperacillin-Tazobactam (122) and Colistin (91). The patients who were escalated (28.24%) from empirical antimicrobial therapy had longer median PICU stay (8 days) compared those who were de-escalated (23.6%). Targeted therapy was given in 10.2% patients. The overall mortality rate was 14.35% and was higher (29.3%) in patients in whom empirical therapy was escalated compared to those who were de-escalated or continued. The study established a benchmark for antimicrobials use in the PICU and highlighted priority areas for antimicrobial stewardship intervention to enhance de-escalation rates, enhance targeted therapy, and reduce the overuse of antimicrobials especially belonging to the reserve group.

A standardized guideline for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical neonates. Semin Pediatr Surg 2019;28:53-56. [PMID: 30824135 DOI: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2019.01.009]

Infection following surgical procedures leads to increased morbidity and mortality in all populations. Guidelines to aid providers in the proper use of prophylactic antibiotics exist for adults, but are rare in the neonatal surgical population. A recent emphasis on appropriate antibiotic stewardship had led to the development of more guidelines without a coincident increase in surgical site infection. Robust data from randomized, controlled trials, however, remain sparse.

Antibiotics-related adverse events in the infectious diseases department of a French teaching hospital: a prospective study

Antibiotics are a significant cause of adverse events (AE), but few studies have focused on prescriptions in hospitalized patients. In infectious diseases departments, the high frequency and diversity of antibiotics prescribed makes AE post-marketing monitoring easier. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and type of AE in the infectious diseases department of a French teaching tertiary-care hospital. The main characteristics of each hospitalization, including all antibiotics prescribed and any significant AE were recorded prospectively in the medical dashboard of the department. We included all patients having suffered an AE due to systemic antibiotics between January 2008 and March 2011. Among the 3963 hospitalized patients, 2682 (68%) received an antibiotic and 151/2682 (5.6%) suffered an AE. Fifty-two (34%) AE were gastrointestinal disorders, 32 (21%) dermatological, 20 (13%) hepatobiliary, 16 (11%) renal and urinary disorders, 13 (9%) neurological and 11 (7%) blood disorders. Rifampin, fosfomycin, cotrimoxazole and linezolid were the leading causes of AE. Sixty-two percent of the antibiotics causing an AE were stopped and 38% were continued (including 11% with a dose modification). Patients suffering from AE had an increased length of stay (18 vs 10 days, P < 0.001). Our data could help choosing the safest antibiotic when several options are possible.

Principles and strategies of antimicrobial stewardship in the neonatal intensive care unit

The judicious use of antibiotics is an important means to limit the emergence of antibiotic-resistant organisms. Although specific guidelines for neonates are often lacking, antibiotic stewardship principles can be applied to the neonatal intensive care unit. Principles include accurately identifying patients who need antibiotic therapy, using local epidemiology to guide the selection of empiric therapy, avoiding agents with overlapping activity, adjusting antibiotics when culture results become available, monitoring for toxicity, and optimizing the dose, route, and duration of therapy. Neonatal intensive care units should develop interdisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship teams with the support of their institutions. Prescriber audit and feedback, as well as preauthorization and formulary restriction of selected antibiotics, are recommended antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Ancillary strategies include education and computerized decision support. Metrics to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship programs should include measurements of patient safety and quality, such as rates of adverse drug events, and appropriate dosing and timing of perioperative prophylaxis.

Neurotoxic effects associated with antibiotic use: management considerations

The clinical manifestations of antibiotic-induced neurotoxic effects, the underlying mechanisms and management strategies have been reviewed. PubMed and OVID searches (January 1960-June 2010) were conducted using search terms such as antibiotics, side effects, neurotoxicity and encephalopathy which yielded approximately 300 articles. All relevant case reports, case series, letters and retrospective reviews describing neurotoxic effects and those discussing mechanisms of neurotoxicity were included. Antibiotic-induced neurotoxic side effects can have a myriad of neurologic presentations. Patients with prior central nervous system (CNS) disease, renal insufficiency and advanced age may be particularly vulnerable. Treatment consists of discontinuation of the offending agent, use of antiepileptic drugs in the case of seizures or status epilepticus and haemodialysis in certain cases. The risk of CNS toxicity may be reduced via dosage adjustments in high risk populations. Awareness of the potential neurotoxic clinical manifestations of various antibiotics and high degree of vigilance in critically ill patients is essential in identifying a potentially serious, though reversible complications of antibiotic therapy particularly with the advent of newer antimicrobial agents.

[Adverse events to antibiotics in inpatients of a university hospital]

OBJECTIVE

Antibiotics are the most common drugs causing adverse events and they lead to problems to patients and additional costs of the health system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the occurrence of adverse events to antibiotics in inpatients of a hospital.

METHODS

An extensive drug monitoring was conducted in adult inpatients taking antibiotics in the city of Maringá, Southern Brazil, from September 2002 to February 2003. Variables related to medications used, especially those related to antibiotic use and adverse events, were studied. Based on criteria for adequate antibiotic use, the observed events were classified as adverse events, medication errors and near-misses. For the analysis of causality between drug administration and event occurrence Naranjo algorithm was used.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were studied and 91 adverse events were identified: three (3.3%) adverse drug reactions; seven (7.7%) medication errors; and 81 (89.0%) medication near-misses. Adverse drug reactions were related to the use of quinolones and likely according to Naranjo algorithm. The seven medication errors were associated to four inadequately prescribed doses and three drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results indicate that an inadequate knowledge on antibiotics or lack of information about the patient at the time of prescription were the major factors involved in the occurrence of adverse events.

The impact of an intensive antimicrobial control program in a Taiwanese medical center

OBJECTIVE

The study evaluates the short term impacts of an intensive control program for the appropriate us of antimicrobials, and to provide a novel strategy for antimicrobial control in inpatient wards in Taiwan.

METHOD

In September 2002, a dual intensive antimicrobial control program was implemented within a 921-bed medical center in Taiwan. The study sample included all patients admitted to the medical center during the basal period (October-December 2001) and the intervention period (October-December 2002), where at least one type of parenteral antimicrobial was administered. The sample comprised of 5046 patients during the basal period and 5054 patients during the intervention period.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Analysis of the impact of the intensive antimicrobial control program was undertaken by comparing clinical outcomes, parenteral antimicrobial consumption and bacterial susceptibilities, before and after the establishment of the intensive antimicrobial control program.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found between the basal and intervention periods with regard to either the demographic variables, such as age and gender, or the incidence of nosocomial infections. The clinical outcomes, including length of stay in the medical center, mortality and readmission rates, were also similar for both periods. As compared to the basal period, the consumption of parenteral antimicrobials--in defined daily doses (DDDs) per 100 patient days (PDs)--declined by 13.2% during the intervention period (71.2 vs. 61.8). There were significant increases in the susceptibilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to both amikacin and ciprofloxacin, and Serratia spp. to ciprofloxacin (P < 0.05), while all others remained stable.

CONCLUSION

This study reports positive responses to intensive antimicrobial control measures among health professionals within a Taiwanese medical center. Following the implementation of the intensive control program, both prescriptions and consumption levels of parenteral antimicrobials were reduced without compromising the clinical outcomes of patients, while the susceptibility patterns of bacterial organisms mostly remained stable. Long-term control of parenteral antimicrobials under such a program may well produce significant benefits for inpatients through the overall rationalization of antimicrobial usage, leading to potential reductions in both the incidence of adverse effects and the burden of resistant organisms. A method of incorporating this intensive control program into a computerized prescription order system is currently under construction.

Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hypersensitivity drug reactions are but one of the many different types of adverse drug reactions. They may be potentially life-threatening, prolong hospitalization, affect drug prescribing patterns of physicians and result in socioeconomic costs. This review summarizes current knowledge on the incidence, prevalence, mortality and risk factors for these reactions in different populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypersensitivity reactions represent about one third of all adverse drug reactions. Adverse drug reactions affect 10-20% of hospitalized patients and more than 7% of the general population. Severe reactions including anaphylaxis, drug hypersensitivity syndromes, Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are also associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors have been identified, their clinical importance has not been fully understood. Future progress in immunogenetics and pharmacogenetics may help identify populations at risk for specific types of reactions.

SUMMARY

Well designed epidemiological studies on hypersensitivity drug reactions are lacking as most studies have been on adverse drug reactions. Such studies will be helpful in identifying patients at risk of developing such reactions, in particular severe reactions, and implementing early preventive measures.