1
|
Zheng S, Fang G, Du J, Dong J. Lipoprotein(a): Are we ready for large-scale clinical trials? Int J Cardiol 2024; 410:132236. [PMID: 38848771 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are currently the most important disease threatening human health, which may be due to the high incidence of risk factors including hyperlipidemia. With the deepening of research on lipoprotein, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has been shown to be an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases and calcified aortic valve stenosis and is now an unaddressed "residual risk" in current CVD management. Accurate measurement of Lp(a) concentration is the basis for diagnosis and treatment of high Lp(a). This review summarized the Lp(a) structure, discussed the current problems in clinical measurement of plasma Lp(a) concentration and the effects of existing lipid-lowering therapies on Lp(a).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiyue Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Guangming Fang
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Du
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Institute of Heart Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Beijing, China.
| | - Jianzeng Dong
- Department of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kaur G, Abdelrahman K, Berman AN, Biery DW, Shiyovich A, Huck D, Garshick M, Blankstein R, Weber B. Lipoprotein(a): Emerging insights and therapeutics. Am J Prev Cardiol 2024; 18:100641. [PMID: 38646022 PMCID: PMC11033089 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2024.100641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The strong association between lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease has led to considerations of Lp(a) being a potential target for mitigating residual cardiovascular risk. While approximately 20 % of the population has an Lp(a) level greater than 50 mg/dL, there are no currently available pharmacological lipid-lowering therapies that have demonstrated substantial reduction in Lp(a). Novel therapies to lower Lp(a) include antisense oligonucleotides and small-interfering ribonucleic acid molecules and have shown promising results in phase 2 trials. Phase 3 trials are currently underway and will test the causal relationship between Lp(a) and ASCVD and whether lowering Lp(a) reduces cardiovascular outcomes. In this review, we summarize emerging insights related to Lp(a)'s role as a risk-enhancing factor for ASCVD, association with calcific aortic stenosis, effects of existing therapies on Lp(a) levels, and variations amongst patient populations. The evolving therapeutic landscape of emerging therapeutics is further discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurleen Kaur
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Adam N. Berman
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David W. Biery
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Arthur Shiyovich
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Huck
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Ron Blankstein
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brittany Weber
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agouridis AP, Filippatos TD, Kostapanos M, Kostara C, Tsimihodimos V. The effect of rosuvastatin alone or in combination with fenofibrate or omega-3 fatty acids on lipoprotein(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis 2024; 9:e26-e32. [PMID: 38434941 PMCID: PMC10905261 DOI: 10.5114/amsad/178441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a strong, genetically determined, pathogenetic factor of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to compare the effect of hypolipidemic treatment on Lp(a) levels of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Material and methods We previously randomized patients with mixed hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein [LDL-C] > 160 mg/dl and triglycerides > 200 mg/dl) to rosuvastatin monotherapy 40 mg/day (R group, n = 30) or rosuvastatin 10 mg/day combined with fenofibrate 200 mg/day (RF group, n = 30) or omega-3 fatty acids 2 g/day (RΩ group, n = 30). In the present post-hoc analysis, we included only the patients whose Lp(a) levels were assessed (16, 16 and 15 in the R, RF and RΩ groups, respectively). Lipid profile and Lp(a) were measured at baseline and after 3 months of treatment. Results Significant reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) and triglyceride levels were observed in all groups. A significant increase in Lp(a) levels was noted in the R (p = 0.017) and RF (p = 0.029) groups, while no significant difference was seen in the RΩ group (p = NS). Regarding Lp(a) elevations, no differences were found between groups. In the R group, a strong negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and LDL-C (r = -0.500, p = 0.049) was observed, while a significant negative correlation between the changes in Lp(a) and triglycerides (r = -0.531, p = 0.034) was noted in the RF group. Conclusions Rosuvastatin and/or fenofibrate treatment increases Lp(a) levels in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. Novel therapies should target Lp(a) level reduction to decrease the residual ASCVD risk in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aris P Agouridis
- School of Medicine, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Department of Internal Medicine, German Oncology Center, Limassol, Cyprus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Theodosios D Filippatos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Michael Kostapanos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
- Lipid Clinic, Department of General Medicine, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, United Kingdom
| | - Christina Kostara
- Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Vasilis Tsimihodimos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tasdighi E, Adhikari R, Almaadawy O, Leucker TM, Blaha MJ. LP(a): Structure, Genetics, Associated Cardiovascular Risk, and Emerging Therapeutics. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 64:135-157. [PMID: 37506332 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-031023-100609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a molecule bound to apolipoprotein(a) with some similarity to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which has been found to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lp(a) appears to induce inflammation, atherogenesis, and thrombosis. Approximately 20% of the world's population has increased Lp(a) levels, determined predominantly by genetics. Current clinical practices for the management of dyslipidemia are ineffective in lowering Lp(a) levels. Evolving RNA-based therapeutics, such as the antisense oligonucleotide pelacarsen and small interfering RNA olpasiran, have shown promising results in reducing Lp(a) levels. Phase III pivotal cardiovascular outcome trials [Lp(a)HORIZON and OCEAN(a)] are ongoing to evaluate their efficacy in secondary prevention of major cardiovascular events in patients with elevated Lp(a). The future of cardiovascular residual risk reduction may transition to a personalized approach where further lowering of either LDL-C, triglycerides, or Lp(a) is selected after high-intensity statin therapy based on the individual risk profile and preferences of each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erfan Tasdighi
- Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rishav Adhikari
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Omar Almaadawy
- Department of Medicine, MedStar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Thorsten M Leucker
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael J Blaha
- Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA;
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Suh SH, Kim SW. Dyslipidemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Overview. Diabetes Metab J 2023; 47:612-629. [PMID: 37482655 PMCID: PMC10555535 DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2023.0067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Dyslipidemia is a potentially modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Whereas the recommendations for the treatment target of dyslipidemia in the general population are being more and more rigorous, the 2013 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline for lipid management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) presented a relatively conservative approach with respect to the indication of lipid lowering therapy and therapeutic monitoring among the patients with CKD. This may be largely attributed to the lack of high-quality evidence derived from CKD population, among whom the overall feature of dyslipidemia is considerably distinctive to that of general population. In this review article, we cover the characteristic features of dyslipidemia and impact of dyslipidemia on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD. We also review the current evidence on lipid lowering therapy to modify the risk of cardiovascular events in this population. We finally discuss the association between dyslipidemia and CKD progression and the potential strategy to delay the progression of CKD in relation to lipid lowering therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Heon Suh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Soo Wan Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Feng T, Li Y, Xue X, Yang W, Li Q, Huang Y, Zhu T, Wang J, Xu L, Li X, Gao J, Sun S, Zhu B, Zhang S, Cao B, Xuan J, Zhao Z, Qian B. Association of statin use and increase in lipoprotein(a): a real-world database research. Eur J Med Res 2023; 28:212. [PMID: 37393291 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-023-01155-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is an increased concern that statins may have an unintended effect of elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]. We conducted a large sample real-world study to test the association. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from an integrated SuValue database, which includes 221 hospitals across China covering more than 200,000 of population with longitudinal follow-up to 10 years. Propensity score matching was applied to identify two comparable cohorts with statin users and non-statin users. Detailed follow-up information such as Lp(a) levels were extracted. The hazard ratio was calculated on Lp(a) changes based on the statin usage cohorts. Detailed subgroup and different characteristic cohorts' analyses were also conducted. RESULTS After baseline propensity score matching, a total of 42,166 patients were included in a 1:1 matched ratio between statin users and non-statin users. In the case of no difference in low density lipoprotein (LDL-C), Lp(a) was increased significantly with the use of statins (adjusted HR 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-1.50). Lp(a) increase was observed in various subgroup analyses and different cohorts. The dose intensity of statin was positively associated with the evaluated Lp(a) level. CONCLUSION The use of statins was associated with an increased risk of Lp(a) elevation compared with non-statin use counterparts. The clinical relevance of these increases needs to be addressed in surrogate marker trials and/or large, cardiovascular outcomes trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tienan Feng
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yao Li
- Clinical Center for Intelligent Rehabilitation Research, Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Wei Yang
- SuValue Health Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yushi Huang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Tengteng Zhu
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jue Wang
- Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Limin Xu
- Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianchen Li
- Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | | | - Bin Zhu
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - ShuYu Zhang
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, China National Nuclear Corporation 416 Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Beibei Cao
- Department of Printing Equipment Engineering, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianwei Xuan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Zhigang Zhao
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Biyun Qian
- Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Tongren Hospital and School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yu Z, Hu L, Sun C, Wang Z, Zhang X, Wu M, Liu L. Effect of Different Types and Dosages of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors on Lipoprotein(a) Levels: A Network Meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2023; 81:445-453. [PMID: 36972559 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has become an important component of the residual risk of cardiovascular diseases. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors display promising effects in controlling Lp(a) levels. However, the effects of different types and dosages of PCSK9 inhibitors on Lp(a) have not been studied in detail. These include 2 monoclonal antibodies, alirocumab and evolocumab, and inclisiran, a small interfering RNA. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials to investigate the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors at the Lp(a) level. Although changes in Lp(a) levels were not the primary endpoint in any of these studies, they all described these valuable data. Forty-one randomized controlled trials with 17,601 participants were included, involving 23 unduplicated interventions. Most PCSK9 inhibitors significantly reduced Lp(a) levels compared with placebo. The pairwise comparison demonstrated no significant difference among most PCSK9 inhibitors. However, in the comparison among different dosages of alirocumab, the dosage of 150 mg Q2W showed a significant reduction in Lp(a) levels compared with the dosages of 150, 200, and 300 mg Q4W. In addition, the comparison results demonstrated the significant efficacy of evolocumab 140 mg Q2W compared with alirocumab at a dosage of 150 mg Q4W. The cumulative rank probabilities demonstrated that evolocumab 140 mg Q2W showed the highest efficacy. This study showed that PCSK9 inhibitors reduced Lp(a) levels by up to 25.1%. A biweekly dose of either 140 mg evolocumab or 150 mg alirocumab was the best treatment option. However, the reduction in Lp(a) levels with a single kind of PCSK9 inhibitor alone did not demonstrate sufficient clinical benefit. Therefore, for patients with very high Lp(a) levels who remain at high residual risk in the context of statin administration, it may be acceptable to use a kind of PCSK9 inhibitor, but the clinical benefit needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zongliang Yu
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Lanqing Hu
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Changxin Sun
- Graduate School of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China; and
| | - Zeping Wang
- Graduate School of Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China; and
| | - Xiaonan Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Min Wu
- Guang'an Men Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Longtao Liu
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barbagelata L, Masson W, Corral P, Lavalle-Cobo A, Nogueira JP, Rosa Diez G. Relationship between lipoprotein(a) levels, cardiovascular outcomes and death in patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review of prospective studies. J Nephrol 2023:10.1007/s40620-023-01590-3. [PMID: 37029883 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01590-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIM In the general population, high levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) are an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. However, the information available in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is less robust. The main objective of this updated systematic review of prospective studies was to analyze the association between elevated Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes or death in patients with CKD. METHODS The PRISMA guidelines were used to carry out this systematic review. Randomized clinical trials or prospective observational studies that evaluated the association between Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes or death in CKD patients were searched in the current literature. RESULTS Fifteen studies including 12,260 individuals were identified and considered eligible for this systematic review. In total, 14 prospective cohorts and one post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial were analyzed. Eight studies evaluated hemodialysis patients, one study analyzed patients on peritoneal dialysis, while six studies evaluated subjects with different stages of CKD. Median follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 8.6 years. Our findings showed that elevated Lp(a) values were associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events or death in most studies, despite adjusting for traditional risk factors. CONCLUSION The findings of this systematic review show that there is a positive association between Lp(a) levels and fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Barbagelata
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Perón 4190, C1199ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Walter Masson
- Cardiology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Perón 4190, C1199ABB, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pablo Corral
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad FASTA, Mar del Plata, Argentina
| | | | - Juan Patricio Nogueira
- Centro de Investigación en Endocrinología, Nutrición y Metabolismo (CIENM), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de Formosa, Formosa, Argentina
| | - Guillermo Rosa Diez
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tsamoulis D, Siountri I, Rallidis LS. Lipoprotein(a): Its Association with Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis, the Emerging RNA-Related Treatments and the Hope for a New Era in “Treating” Aortic Valve Calcification. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:jcdd10030096. [PMID: 36975859 PMCID: PMC10056331 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10030096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of patients with aortic valve calcification (AVC) and calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) remains challenging as, until today, all non-invasive interventions have proven fruitless in preventing the disease’s onset and progression. Despite the similarities in the pathogenesis of AVC and atherosclerosis, statins failed to show a favorable effect in preventing AVC progression. The recognition of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a strong and potentially modifiable risk factor for the development and, perhaps, the progression of AVC and CAVS and the evolution of novel agents leading in a robust Lp(a) reduction, have rekindled hope for a promising future in the treatment of those patients. Lp(a) seems to promote AVC via a ‘three hit’ mechanism including lipid deposition, inflammation and autotaxin transportation. All of these lead to valve interstitial cells transition into osteoblast-like cells and, thus, to parenchymal calcification. Currently available lipid-lowering therapies have shown a neutral or mild effect on Lp(a), which was proven insufficient to contribute to clinical benefits. The short-term safety and the efficacy of the emerging agents in reducing Lp(a) have been proven; nevertheless, their effect on cardiovascular risk is currently under investigation in phase 3 clinical trials. A positive result of these trials will probably be the spark to test the hypothesis of the modification of AVC’s natural history with the novel Lp(a)-lowering agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Donatos Tsamoulis
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Thriasio General Hospital of Eleusis, 192 00 Athens, Greece
- Society of Junior Doctors, 5 Menalou Str., 151 23 Athens, Greece
| | - Iliana Siountri
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Nikaia “Agios Panteleimon”, 184 54 Nikaia, Greece
| | - Loukianos S. Rallidis
- Second Department of Cardiology, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, University General Hospital ATTIKON, 124 62 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lipoprotein(a) in Atherosclerotic Diseases: From Pathophysiology to Diagnosis and Treatment. Molecules 2023; 28:molecules28030969. [PMID: 36770634 PMCID: PMC9918959 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28030969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is a low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol-like particle bound to apolipoprotein(a). Increased Lp(a) levels are an independent, heritable causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) as they are largely determined by variations in the Lp(a) gene (LPA) locus encoding apo(a). Lp(a) is the preferential lipoprotein carrier for oxidized phospholipids (OxPL), and its role adversely affects vascular inflammation, atherosclerotic lesions, endothelial function and thrombogenicity, which pathophysiologically leads to cardiovascular (CV) events. Despite this crucial role of Lp(a), its measurement lacks a globally unified method, and, between different laboratories, results need standardization. Standard antilipidemic therapies, such as statins, fibrates and ezetimibe, have a mediocre effect on Lp(a) levels, although it is not yet clear whether such treatments can affect CV events and prognosis. This narrative review aims to summarize knowledge regarding the mechanisms mediating the effect of Lp(a) on inflammation, atherosclerosis and thrombosis and discuss current diagnostic and therapeutic potentials.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhu L, Fang Y, Gao B, Jin X, Zheng J, He Y, Huang J. Effect of an increase in Lp(a) following statin therapy on cardiovascular prognosis in secondary prevention population of coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2022; 22:474. [PMID: 36348286 PMCID: PMC9644478 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-022-02932-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent studies have indicated that statins tend to increase Lp(a) levels by 10-20%. However, the association of statin-mediated increases in Lp(a) levels with CAD has not been determined. METHODS: This study included 488 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Lp(a) levels were measured at baseline and 1 month after statin therapy. The study endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Hazard ratios for the MACE were adjusted for potential confounder using Cox regression. RESULTS After statin therapy, the mean level of Lp(a) increased by 19.3% from baseline. Lp(a) levels increased in 307 patients (62.9%) with a median elevation of 4.1 mg/dL. Patients with an increase in Lp(a) were at higher risk for MACE than those without an increase in Lp(a) (p = 0.044). Subgroup analyses revealed that a mild-to-moderate increase in Lp(a) was not associated with MACE, whereas there was a strong correlation between the highest quartile increase in Lp(a) (≥ 10.1 mg/dL) and MACE (HR = 2.29, 95%CI = 1.36-3.84, p = 0.002). This correlation was independent of baseline Lp(a) levels but not independent of on-statin Lp(a) levels. CONCLUSIONS Severe increases in Lp(a) following statin therapy raise the risk of MACE, but a mild-to-moderate increase in Lp(a) may not affect the cardiovascular prognosis of CAD patients. Even if the baseline Lp(a) levels are low, it is necessary to continue testing for Lp(a) concentration at least once after statin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijun Zhu
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo Municipal Medical Center LiHuili Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yangliang Fang
- Department of Cardiology, Ningbo Municipal Medical Center LiHuili Hospital, Zhejiang, China
| | - Beibei Gao
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiangbo Jin
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiamin Zheng
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| | - Ying He
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jinyu Huang
- grid.13402.340000 0004 1759 700XDepartment of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yanai H, Adachi H, Hakoshima M, Katsuyama H. Atherogenic Lipoproteins for the Statin Residual Cardiovascular Disease Risk. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232113499. [PMID: 36362288 PMCID: PMC9657259 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show that decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by the use of statins cause a significant reduction in the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, one of our previous studies showed that, among eight RCTs that investigated the effect of statins vs. a placebo on CVD development, 56–79% of patients had residual CVD risk after the trials. In three RCTs that investigated the effect of a high dose vs. a usual dose of statins on CVD development, 78–87% of patients in the high-dose statin arms still had residual CVD risk. The risk of CVD development remains even when statins are used to strongly reduce LDL-C, and this type of risk is now regarded as statin residual CVD risk. Our study shows that elevated triglyceride (TG) levels, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and the existence of obesity/insulin resistance and diabetes may be important metabolic factors that determine statin residual CVD risk. Here, we discuss atherogenic lipoproteins that were not investigated in such RCTs, such as lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), remnant lipoproteins, malondialdehyde-modified LDL (MDA-LDL), and small-dense LDL (Sd-LDL). Lp(a) is under strong genetic control by apolipoprotein (a), which is an LPA gene locus. Variations in the LPA gene account for 91% of the variability in the plasma concentration of Lp(a). A meta-analysis showed that genetic variations at the LPA locus are associated with CVD events during statin therapy, independent of the extent of LDL lowering, providing support for exploring strategies targeting circulating concentrations of Lp(a) to reduce CVD events in patients receiving statins. Remnant lipoproteins and small-dense LDL are highly associated with high TG levels, low HDL-C, and obesity/insulin resistance. MDA-LDL is a representative form of oxidized LDL and plays important roles in the formation and development of the primary lesions of atherosclerosis. MDA-LDL levels were higher in CVD patients and diabetic patients than in the control subjects. Furthermore, we demonstrated the atherogenic properties of such lipoproteins and their association with CVD as well as therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidekatsu Yanai
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-473-72-3501; Fax: +81-473-72-1858
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Navarro A, Cabezas-Agrícola JM, Hermida FJ. Effect of lipoprotein (a) on the analytical determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) and its influence on pharmacological treatment with atorvastatin. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2022; 82:513-517. [PMID: 36200772 DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2022.2128862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) is an important risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of Lp(a) concentration both on the indirect analytical measurement of LDLc and on the efficacy of dyslipidaemia treatment using the atorvastatin statin. Two retrospective studies were conducted, one with 340 patients and another with 107 patients treated with atorvastatin. Lp(a) concentrations were measured by turbidimetry with an assay independent of the size of the apo(a) isoform. LDLc was calculated using the Friedewald equation and the corrected LDLc was calculated using the Dahlén equation. A strong positive correlation was observed between the serum Lp(a) concentration and the LDLc-overestimation percentage (r = 0.960, p < .001). It was also observed that as the Lp(a) concentration rose there was no significant variation in the percentage decrease in corrected LDLc during atorvastatin treatment (r = 0.186, p > .05). The concentration of LDLc obtained by using the Friedewald equation included Lp(a) cholesterol. The lowering of LDLc in patients treated with atorvastatin depended solely on accessible LDL cholesterol and not on Lp(a) cholesterol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aida Navarro
- Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana s/n, A Coruña, Spain
| | - José Manuel Cabezas-Agrícola
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana s/n, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Fernando Jesús Hermida
- Servicio de Análisis Clínicos, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, C/Choupana s/n, A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhang J, Wang X, Tian W, Wang T, Jia J, Lai R, Wang T, Zhang Z, Song L, Ju J, Xu H. The effect of various types and doses of statins on C-reactive protein levels in patients with dyslipidemia or coronary heart disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:936817. [PMID: 35966518 PMCID: PMC9363636 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.936817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The objective of this study was to measure the efficacy of various types and dosages of statins on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in patients with dyslipidemia or coronary heart disease. Methods Randomized controlled trials were searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, OpenGray, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for data extraction and synthesis. The pairwise meta-analysis compared statins and controls using a random-effects model, and a network meta-analysis compared the types and dosages of statins using the Bayesian random-effects model. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42021242067. Results The study included 37 randomized controlled trials with 17,410 participants and 20 interventions. According to the pairwise meta-analysis, statins significantly decreased CRP levels compared to controls (weighted mean difference [WMD] = −0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−1.31, −0.64], P < 0.0001). In the network meta-analysis, simvastatin 40 mg/day appeared to be the best strategy for lowering CRP (Rank P = 0.18, WMD = −4.07, 95% CI = [−6.52, −1.77]). The same was true for the high-sensitivity CRP, non-acute coronary syndrome (ACS), <12 months duration, and clear measurement subgroups. In the CRP subgroup (rank P = 0.79, WMD = −1.23, 95% CI = [−2.48, −0.08]) and ≥12-month duration subgroup (Rank P = 0.40, WMD = −2.13, 95% CI = [−4.24, −0.13]), atorvastatin 80 mg/day was most likely to be the best. There were no significant differences in the dyslipidemia and ACS subgroups (P > 0.05). Node-splitting analysis showed no significant inconsistency (P > 0.05), except for the coronary heart disease subgroup. Conclusion Statins reduced serum CRP levels in patients with dyslipidemia or coronary heart disease. Simvastatin 40 mg/day might be the most effective therapy, and atorvastatin 80 mg/day showed the best long-term effect. This study provides a reference for choosing statin therapy based on LDL-C and CRP levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Xinyi Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wende Tian
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tongxin Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jundi Jia
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Runmin Lai
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tong Wang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zihao Zhang
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Luxia Song
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Jianqing Ju
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jianqing Ju
| | - Hao Xu
- National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Cardiology, Xiyuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Hao Xu
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lipoprotein (a) and Cardiovascular Disease: A Missing Link for Premature Atherosclerotic Heart Disease and/or Residual Risk. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2021; 79:e18-e35. [PMID: 34694242 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Lipoprotein(a) or lipoprotein "little a" is an under-recognized causal risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD), including coronary atherosclerosis, aortic valvular stenosis, ischemic stroke, heart failure and peripheral arterial disease. Elevated plasma Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL or ≥100 nmol/L) is commonly encountered in almost 1 in 5 individuals and confers a higher CV risk compared to those with normal Lp(a) levels, although such normal levels have not been generally agreed upon. Elevated Lp(a) is considered a cause of premature and accelerated atherosclerotic CVD. Thus, in patients with a positive family or personal history of premature coronary artery disease (CAD), Lp(a) should be measured. However, elevated Lp(a) may confer increased risk for incident CAD even in the absence of a family history of CAD, and even in those who have guideline-lowered LDL-cholesterol (<70 mg/dl) and continue to have a persisting CV residual risk. Thus, measurement of Lp(a) will have a significant clinical impact on the assessment of atherosclerotic CVD risk, and will assume a more important role in managing patients with CVD with the advent and clinical application of specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies. Conventional therapeutic approaches like lifestyle modification and statin therapy remain ineffective at lowering Lp(a). Newer treatment modalities, such as gene silencing via RNA interference with use of antisense oligonucleotide(s) or small interfering RNA molecules targeting Lp(a) seem very promising. These issues are herein reviewed, accumulated data are scrutinized, meta-analyses and current guidelines are tabulated and Lp(a)-related CVDs and newer therapeutic modalities are pictorially illustrated.
Collapse
|
16
|
Handhle A, Viljoen A, Wierzbicki AS. Elevated Lipoprotein(a): Background, Current Insights and Future Potential Therapies. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2021; 17:527-542. [PMID: 34526771 PMCID: PMC8436116 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s266244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) forms a subfraction of the lipid profile and is characterized by the addition of apolipprotein(a) (apo(a)) to apoB100 derived particles. Its levels are mostly genetically determined inversely related to the number of protein domain (kringle) repeats in apo(a). In epidemiological studies, it shows consistent association with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and most recently with extent of aortic stenosis. Issues with standardizing the measurement of Lp(a) are being resolved and consensus statements favor its measurement in patients at high risk of, or with family histories of CVD events. Major lipid-lowering therapies such as statin, fibrates, and ezetimibe have little effect on Lp(a) levels. Therapies such as niacin or cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors lower Lp(a) as well as reducing other lipid-related risk factors but have failed to clearly reduce CVD events. Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 (PCSK9) inhibitors reduce cholesterol and Lp(a) as well as reducing CVD events. New antisense therapies specifically targeting apo(a) and hence Lp(a) have greater and more specific effects and will help clarify the extent to which intervention in Lp(a) levels will reduce CVD events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Handhle
- Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Adie Viljoen
- Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, North & East Hertfordshire Hospitals Trust, Lister Hospital, Hertfordshire, UK
| | - Anthony S Wierzbicki
- Department of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Guy's & St Thomas', Hospitals, London, SE1 7EH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ruscica M, Sirtori CR, Corsini A, Watts GF, Sahebkar A. Lipoprotein(a): Knowns, unknowns and uncertainties. Pharmacol Res 2021; 173:105812. [PMID: 34450317 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Over the last 10 years, there have been advances on several aspects of lipoprotein(a) which are reviewed in the present article. Since the standard immunoassays for measuring lipoprotein(a) are not fully apo(a) isoform-insensitive, the application of an LC-MS/MS method for assaying molar concentrations of lipoprotein(a) has been advocated. Genome wide association, epidemiological, and clinical studies have established high lipoprotein(a) as a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). However, the relative importance of molar concentration, apo(a) isoform size or variants within the LPA gene is still controversial. Lipoprotein(a)-raising single nucleotide polymorphisms has not been shown to add on value in predicting ASCVD beyond lipoprotein(a) concentrations. Although hyperlipoproteinemia(a) represents an important confounder in the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), it enhances the risk of ASCVD in these patients. Thus, identification of new cases of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) during cascade testing can increase the identification of high-risk individuals. However, it remains unclear whether FH itself increases lipoprotein(a). The ASCVD risk associated with lipoprotein(a) seems to follow a linear gradient across the distribution, regardless of racial subgroups and other risk factors. The inverse association with the risk of developing type 2 diabetes needs consideration as effective lipoprotein(a) lowering therapies are progressing towards the market. Considering that Mendelian randomization analyses have identified the degree of lipoprotein(a)-lowering that is required to achieve ASCVD benefit, the findings of the ongoing outcome trial with pelacarsen will clarify whether dramatically lowering lipoprotein(a) levels can reduce the risk of ASCVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimiliano Ruscica
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
| | - Cesare R Sirtori
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy
| | - Alberto Corsini
- Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy; IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, Milan, Italy
| | - Gerald F Watts
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Lipid Disorders Clinic, Cardiometabolic Services, Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Australia
| | - Amirhossein Sahebkar
- School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Biotechnology Research Center, Pharmaceutical Technology Institute, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|