Third trimester placental volume and biometry measurement: A method-development study

MRI assessed placental volume and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to evaluate the potential utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) placental volume as an assessment of placental insufficiency.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort undergoing serial placental MRIs at two academic tertiary care centers. The population included 316 participants undergoing MRI up to three times throughout gestation. MRI was used to calculate placental volume in milliliters (ml). Placental-mediated adverse pregnancy outcome (cAPO) included preeclampsia with severe features, abnormal antenatal surveillance, and perinatal mortality. Serial measurements were grouped as time point 1 (TP1) <22 weeks, TP2 22 0/7-29 6/7 weeks, and TP3 ≥30 weeks. Mixed effects models compared change in placental volume across gestation between cAPO groups. Association between cAPO and placental volume was determined using logistic regression at each TP with discrimination evaluated using area under receiver operator curve (AUC). Placental volume was then added to known clinical predictive variables and evaluated with test characteristics and calibration.

RESULTS

59 (18.7 %) of 316 participants developed cAPO. Placental volume growth across gestation was slower in the cAPO group (p < 0.001). Placental volume was lower in the cAPO group at all time points, and alone was moderately predictive of cAPO at TP3 (AUC 0.756). Adding placental volume to clinical variables had moderate discrimination at all time points, with strongest test characteristics at TP3 (AUC 0.792) with sensitivity of 77.5 % and specificity of 75.3 % at a predicted probability cutoff of 15 %.

DISCUSSION

MRI placental volume warrants further study for assessment of placental insufficiency, particularly later in gestation.

Reference Ranges of 2-Dimensional Placental Biometry and 3-Dimensional Placental Volume between 11 and 14 Weeks of Gestation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide gestational age (GA) specific reference ranges for 2-dimensional (2D) placental biometry and 3-dimensional (3D) placental volume between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation.

METHODS

Placental biometry including 2D and 3D variables was calculated in 1142 first-trimester singleton pregnancies with non-complicated outcome between September 2016 and February 2020. Ultrasound datasets were obtained at the time of the first-trimester ultrasound, and 2D basal plate (BP), chorionic plate (CP), placental thickness (PT), and 3D placental volume (PV) were measured following a standardized methodology. Reference ranges for each variable were calculated according to GA and crown-rump-length (CRL).

RESULTS

A total of 1142 uncomplicated pregnancies were considered for analysis. All placental measurements increased significantly between 11 and 14 weeks, especially for PT (39.64%) and PV (64.4%). Reference ranges were constructed for each 2D and 3D first-trimester placental variable using the best-fit regression model for the predicted mean and SD as a function of GA and CRL.

CONCLUSIONS

Reference ranges of 2D placental biometry and 3D placental volume between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation were constructed, generating reference values. Placental biometry showed a progressive increase during the first trimester. This highlights the importance of using reference range charts according to GA.

Two-dimensional (2D) placental ultrasound measurements - The correlation with placental volume measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

INTRODUCTION

Information about placental size in ongoing pregnancies may aid the identification of pregnancies with increased risk of adverse outcome. Placental volume can be measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, this method is not universally available in antenatal care. Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. Therefore, we studied whether simple two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound placental measurements were correlated with placental volume measured by MRI.

METHODS

We examined a convenience sample of 104 ongoing pregnancies at gestational week 27, using both ultrasound and MRI. The ultrasound measurements included placental length, width and thickness. Placental volume was measured using MRI. The correlation between each 2D placental ultrasound measurement and placental volume was estimated by applying Pearson's correlation coefficient (r).

RESULTS

Mean placental length was 17.2 cm (SD 2.1 cm), mean width was 14.7 cm (SD 2.1 cm), and mean thickness was 3.2 cm (SD 0.6 cm). Mean placental volume was 536 cm3 (SD 137 cm3). The 2D ultrasound measurements showed poor correlation with placental volume (placental length; r = 0.27, width; r = 0.37, and thickness r = 0.13).

DISCUSSION

Simple 2D ultrasound measurements of the placenta were poorly correlated with placental volume and cannot be used as proximate measures of placental volume. Our finding may be explained by the large variation between pregnancies in intrauterine placental shape.

Placental size at gestational week 36: Comparisons between ongoing pregnancies and deliveries

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to compare placental size and placental size relative to fetal size (ratio) in ongoing pregnancies examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at gestational week 36 with placental size among all deliveries at gestational week 36 during the same time period.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ongoing unselected singleton pregnancies (n = 89) were examined by MRI at median gestational week 36+5 days during 2017-2018, and placental and fetal volumes (cm3 ) were calculated. The placental size and ratio in ongoing pregnancies were compared with placental size and ratio among all deliveries in Norway at gestational week 36 (median gestational week 36+4 days) during 2016-2019 (n = 5582). For comparison of size, we converted volume (cm3 ) in ongoing pregnancies into grams as: cm3  × 1.05 (density of placental and fetal tissue).

RESULTS

In ongoing pregnancies, median placental size was 873  (interquartile range [IQR] 265) grams and median size of all delivered placentas was 613 (IQR 290) grams. Placental size was smaller among the delivered placentas independent of delivery mode: 760 (IQR 387) grams among elective cesarean deliveries (n = 465) and 590 (IQR 189) grams among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor (n = 2478). Median ratio in ongoing pregnancies was higher than among deliveries: 0.31 (IQR 0.08) vs 0.21 (IQR 0.08). The ratio was higher in ongoing pregnancies independent of delivery mode: 0.24 (IQR 0.17) among elective cesarean deliveries vs 0.21 (IQR 0.05) among vaginal deliveries after spontaneous onset of labor.

CONCLUSIONS

The placenta is larger in ongoing pregnancies than among deliveries. This finding suggests that placental size decreases during labor and delivery, possibly by transfer of blood to the fetus. Our finding also suggests that reference values of placental size based on delivered placentas are not valid for ongoing pregnancies.

Placenta segmentation in ultrasound imaging: Addressing sources of uncertainty and limited field-of-view

Automatic segmentation of the placenta in fetal ultrasound (US) is challenging due to the (i) high diversity of placenta appearance, (ii) the restricted quality in US resulting in highly variable reference annotations, and (iii) the limited field-of-view of US prohibiting whole placenta assessment at late gestation. In this work, we address these three challenges with a multi-task learning approach that combines the classification of placental location (e.g., anterior, posterior) and semantic placenta segmentation in a single convolutional neural network. Through the classification task the model can learn from larger and more diverse datasets while improving the accuracy of the segmentation task in particular in limited training set conditions. With this approach we investigate the variability in annotations from multiple raters and show that our automatic segmentations (Dice of 0.86 for anterior and 0.83 for posterior placentas) achieve human-level performance as compared to intra- and inter-observer variability. Lastly, our approach can deliver whole placenta segmentation using a multi-view US acquisition pipeline consisting of three stages: multi-probe image acquisition, image fusion and image segmentation. This results in high quality segmentation of larger structures such as the placenta in US with reduced image artifacts which are beyond the field-of-view of single probes.

Umbilical cord diameter in the prediction of foetal growth restriction: a cross sectional study

This was a cross sectional study with a prospective design conducted from October 2018 to October 2019. We recruited patients at risk for FGR and normal pregnant women. Each patient had ultrasound examination for the umbilical cord diameter in the 28th, 32nd, 36th, and the 40th week, Foetal growth restriction developed in 10/76 (13.2%) patients in the at risk group. The umbilical cord diameter was significantly lower in the at risk group (1.8 ± 0.2 versus 2.0 ± 0.2 in the control group with a p value of <.001). The umbilical cord diameter was highly predictive for the occurrence of FGR at each antenatal care visit as well as at delivery. We concluded that the umbilical cord diameter was a significant predictor of foetal growth restriction when applied through the antenatal care visits. It is a simple and easy method causing no distress for the patients.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Conflicting results exist regarding the predictive role of the umbilical cord in foetal growth restriction.What do the results of this study add? Foetal umbilical cord diameter was correlated significantly to foetal weight and had a significant predictive role in the prediction of FGR. The cut off values for the umbilical cord diameter in women with FGR were not evaluated before.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Comparing the ultrasound findings with histopathologic examination of the umbilical cord and the placentas would be recommended.

Normative placental structure in pregnancy using quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging

INTRODUCTION

To characterize normative morphometric, textural and microstructural placental development by applying advanced and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) techniques to the in-vivo placenta.

METHODS

We enrolled 195 women with uncomplicated, healthy singleton pregnancies in a prospective observational study. Women underwent MRI between 16- and 40-weeks' gestation. Morphometric and textural metrics of placental growth were calculated from T2-weighted (T2W) images, while measures of microstructural development were calculated from diffusion-weighted images (DWI). Normative tables and reference curves were constructed for each measured index across gestation and according to fetal sex.

RESULTS

Data from 269 MRI studies from 169 pregnant women were included in the analyses. During the study period, placentas undergo significant increases in morphometric measures of volume, thickness, and elongation. Placental texture reveals increasing variability with advancing gestation as measured by grey level non uniformity, run length non uniformity and long run high grey level emphasis. Placental microstructure did not vary with gestational age. Placental elongation was the only metric that differed significantly between male and female fetuses.

DISCUSSION

We report quantitative metrics of placental morphometry, texture and microstructure in a large cohort of healthy controls during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. These measures can serve as normative references of in-vivo placental development to better understand placental function in high-risk conditions and allow for the early detection of placental mal-development.

Placental volume in gestational week 27 measured by three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound is the diagnostic tool of choice in pregnancy. We lack valid ultrasound methods for placental size measurements. Our aim was therefore to compare three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for measurements of placental volume.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We measured placental volume by 3D ultrasound and MRI in 100 unselected pregnancies at 27 weeks of gestation (25⁺⁴ -28⁺⁴  weeks). The 3D ultrasound acquisitions were analyzed offline, and the placental outline was manually traced using the virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) 30° rotational technique. The MRI examinations included a T2-weighted gradient echo sequence in the sagittal plane, with 5-mm slices through the entire uterus. The placental outline was manually traced in each slice. The correlation between 3D ultrasound and MRI placental volumes was estimated by intraclass correlation coefficients. Bland-Altman analysis was applied to visualize systematic bias and limits of agreement, in which the ratio MRI placental volume/3D ultrasound placental volume was plotted against the average of the two methods.

RESULTS

The intraclass correlation coefficient between 3D ultrasound and MRI measurements was 0.49 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.63). In general, 3D ultrasound measured smaller placental volumes (median 373 cm³ , interquartile range 309-434 cm³ ) than MRI (median 507 cm³ , interquartile range 429-595 cm³ ) and the systematic bias was 1.44. The 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were wide (0.68-2.21).

CONCLUSIONS

We found poor to moderate correlation between 3D ultrasound and MRI placental volume measurements. Generally, 3D ultrasound measured smaller placental volumes than MRI, suggesting that 3D ultrasound failed to visualize the entire placenta. Our findings may hopefully contribute to the improvement of ultrasound methods for placental measurements.

Risk stratification for early-onset fetal growth restriction in women with abnormal serum biomarkers: a retrospective cohort study

Abnormal maternal serum biomarkers (AMSB), identified through the aneuploidy screening programme, are frequent incidental findings in pregnancy. They are associated with fetal growth restriction (FGR), but previous studies have not examined whether this association is with early-onset (< 34 weeks) or late-onset (> 34 weeks) FGR; as a result there is no consensus on management. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence and phenotype of FGR in women with AMSB and test the predictive value of placental sonographic screening to predict early-onset FGR. 1196 pregnant women with AMSB underwent a 21-24 week "placental screen" comprising fetal and placental size, and uterine artery Doppler. Multivariable regression was used to calculate a predictive model for early-onset FGR (birthweight centile < 3rd/< 10th with absent umbilical end-diastolic flow, < 34 weeks). FGR prevalence was high (10.3%), however early-onset FGR was uncommon (2.3%). Placental screening effectively identified early-onset (area under the curve (AUC) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.00), but not late-onset FGR (AUC 0.70, 95% CI 0.64-0.75). Internal validation demonstrated robust performance for detection/exclusion of early-onset FGR. In this cohort, utilisation of our proposed algorithm with targeted fetal growth and Doppler surveillance, compared with universal comprehensive surveillance would have avoided 1044 scans, potentiating significant cost-saving for maternity services.

Correlation of ultrasound placental diameter & thickness with gestational age

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Estimation of fetal maturity is common in obstetric practice especially when the women do not keep accurate menstrual records. An accurate establishment of expected date of delivery is fundamental to the management of both high risk and normal pregnancies. The objective of this study was to determine the placental diameter (PD), placental thickness (PT) and to establish a correlation between PD, PT and gestational age.

METHODS

This is an observational cross-sectional study that examines by means of ultrasonography the correlation between placental diameter and thickness with gestational age in Enugu, South East, Nigeria.

RESULTS

A total of 400 healthy subjects were recruited in 3rd trimester of pregnancy having fulfilled the inclusion criteria. PD and PT in this study did not correlate with parity. There is a linear increase of gestational age and placental thickness and diameter. These increases heighten between 38th week gestation and 40 weeks' gestation. 205.0±1.4, 43.00±0.0 to 215.0±1.4, 46.00±2.8 respectively.

CONCLUSION

Placental thickness and Placental diameter can be used to predict gestational age. It is therefore advised to use PT & PD in ultrasound obstetric assessment especially when Last menstrual period (LMP) is not clear.

Fetoplacental ratios in stillbirths and second trimester miscarriages

An abnormal fetoplacental (F/P) ratio is a risk factor for poor pregnancy outcomes including fetal death, but studies of F/P ratio among stillbirths are limited. In the Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Program cohort of second and third trimester fetal deaths, 1,022 were at ≥24 weeks with data on fetal and placental weight. Comparison with data for viable infants of the same gestational ages (GAs) showed that the F/P ratio increases more rapidly with GA for stillbirths than for viable infants. While placentas of stillborn infants are small at all GA, weights of deceased fetuses are lowest early in the second trimester, becoming nearly normal by term. Excess high F/P ratios are noted at all GAs, increasing toward term, while low ratios are frequent at early gestation but rare near term. Analysis by cause of death shows that F/P ratios are markedly elevated for placental and maternal causes (about 50% above the 90th centile), somewhat elevated for cord accidents, non-hydropic fetal, and unknown causes (about 1/3 above the 90th centile), and variable with 40% below the 10th centile for hydropic stillbirths. Across all causes and GAs, placental weights are more abnormal than fetal weights, suggesting that diminished placental function may contribute to fetal demise even when non-placental causes (e.g., premature membrane rupture, cord accidents, and chromosomal disorders) are identified. About half of all stillbirths have abnormal F/P ratios, suggesting that improvements in prenatal assessment of placental size and function might aid in identifying pregnancies at risk for demise; unfortunately, therapeutic options for ongoing pregnancies with diminished placental function remain limited.

Role of 2-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging in Placental and Umbilical Cord Morphometry: Literature and Pictorial Review

Abnormalities of the placenta and umbilical cord have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Antenatal detection of placental and umbilical cord abnormalities using ultrasound (US) imaging is now gaining popularity with the advancements in obstetric US. This article reviews the use of 2-dimensional obstetric US as a tool to measure and assess placental and umbilical cord morphometry. It highlights the potential role of placental and umbilical cord morphometry as a valuable component of the screening tool for high risk pregnancies and identifies the need for further research to examine its feasibility.

Gestational growth trajectories derived from a dynamic fetal-placental scaling law

Fetal trajectories characterizing growth rates in utero have relied primarily on goodness of fit rather than mechanistic properties exhibited in utero. Here, we use a validated fetal-placental allometric scaling law and a first principles differential equations model of placental volume growth to generate biologically meaningful fetal-placental growth curves. The growth curves form the foundation for understanding healthy versus at-risk fetal growth and for identifying the timing of key events in utero.

Associations Between the Features of Gross Placental Morphology and Birthweight

The placenta plays a critical role in regulating fetal growth. Recent studies suggest that there may be sex-specific differences in placental development. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the associations between birthweight and placental morphology in models adjusted for covariates and to assess sex-specific differences in these associations. We analyzed data from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network's population-based case-control study conducted between 2006 and 2008, which recruited cases of stillbirth and population-based controls in 5 states. Our analysis was restricted to singleton live births with a placental examination (n = 1229). Characteristics of placental morphology evaluated include thickness, surface area, difference in diameters, shape, and umbilical cord insertion site. We used linear regression to model birthweight as a function of placental morphology and covariates. Surface area had the greatest association with birthweight; a reduction in surface area of 83 cm2, which reflects the interquartile range, is associated with a 260.2-g reduction in birthweight (95% confidence interval, -299.9 to -220.6), after adjustment for other features of placental morphology and covariates. Reduced placental thickness was also associated with lower birthweight. These associations did not differ between males and females. Our results suggest that reduced placental thickness and surface area are independently associated with lower birthweight and that these relationships are not related to sex.

The Possible Role of Placental Morphometry in the Detection of Fetal Growth Restriction

Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is often the result of placental insufficiency and is characterized by insufficient transplacental transport of nutrients and oxygen. The main underlying entities of placental insufficiency, the pathophysiologic mechanism, can broadly be divided into impairments in blood flow and exchange capacity over the syncytiovascular membranes of the fetal placenta villi. Fetal growth restriction is not synonymous with small for gestational age and techniques to distinguish between both are needed. Placental insufficiency has significant associations with adverse pregnancy outcomes (perinatal mortality and morbidity). Even in apparently healthy survivors, altered fetal programming may lead to long-term neurodevelopmental and metabolic effects. Although the concept of fetal growth restriction is well appreciated in contemporary obstetrics, the appropriate detection of FGR remains an issue in clinical practice. Several approaches have aimed to improve detection, e.g., uniform definition of FGR, use of Doppler ultrasound profiles and use of growth trajectories by ultrasound fetal biometry. However, the role of placental morphometry (placental dimensions/shape and weight) deserves further exploration. This review article covers the clinical relevance of placental morphometry during pregnancy and at birth to help recognize fetuses who are growth restricted. The assessment has wide intra- and interindividual variability with various consequences. Previous studies have shown that a small placental surface area and low placental weight are associated with a slower growth of the fetus. Parameters such as placental surface area, placental volume and placental weight in relation to birth weight can help to identify FGR. In the future, a model including sophisticated antenatal placental morphometry may prove to be a clinically useful method for screening or diagnosing growth restricted fetuses, in order to provide optimal monitoring.

Maternal Hematological Parameters and Placental and Umbilical Cord Histopathology in Intrauterine Growth Restriction

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the placental and umbilical cord histopathology in intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and their relation to second-trimester maternal hematological parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were selected for the IUGR group based on estimated fetal weight below the 10th percentile. Patients were recruited into the control group randomly. Patients were followed up with ultrasound, and blood samples were taken between the 20th and 24th gestational weeks. After delivery and formalin fixation, weight and volume of the placenta were recorded and histologic samples were processed.

RESULTS

Maternal platelet count strongly correlates with placental weight (r = 0.766). On the other hand, neonatal weight correlates with placental volume (r = 0.572) rather than with placental weight (r = 0.469). Umbilical arterial lumen cross-sectional area correlates with birth weight (r = 0.338).

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal hematological parameters do not seem to affect neonatal outcome. Our main findings are the correlation of maternal platelet count with placental weight, the correlation of placental volume with birth weight being stronger than the correlation of placental weight with birth weight, and the correlation of umbilical artery lumen cross-sectional area with neonatal weight. Mild histopathologic alterations might occur in normal pregnancies; however, sufficient fetal nutrition can be maintained. This compensatory function of the placenta seems to be insufficient when two or more pathologies are present, which is characteristic for IUGR.

Antenatal placental assessment in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome after reduced fetal movement

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of in utero placental assessment in predicting adverse pregnancy outcome after reported reduced fetal movements (RFM).

METHOD

A non-interventional prospective cohort study of women (N = 300) with subjective RFM at ≥28 weeks' gestation in singleton non-anomalous pregnancies at a UK tertiary maternity hospital. Clinical, sonographic (fetal weight, placental size and maternal, fetal and placental arterial Doppler) and biochemical (maternal serum hCG, hPL, progesterone, PlGF and sFlt-1) assessment was conducted. Multiple logistic regression identified combinations of measurements (models) most predictive of adverse pregnancy outcome (perinatal mortality, birth weight <10th centile, five minute Apgar score <7, umbilical arterial pH <7.1 or base excess <-10, neonatal intensive care admission). Models were compared by test performance characteristics (ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, positive/negative likelihood ratios) against baseline care (estimated fetal weight centile, amniotic fluid index and gestation at presentation).

RESULTS

61 (20.6%) pregnancies ended in adverse outcome. Models incorporating PlGF/sFlt-1 ratio and umbilical artery free loop Doppler impedance demonstrated modest improvement in ROC area for adverse outcome (baseline care 0.69 vs. proposed models 0.73-0.76, p<0.05). However, there was little improvement in other test characteristics (baseline vs. best proposed model: sensitivity 21.7% [95% confidence interval 13.1-33.6] vs. 35.8%% [24.4-49.3], specificity 96.6% [93.4-98.3] vs. 94.7% [90.7-97.0], PPV 61.9% [40.9-79.3] vs. 63.3% [45.5-78.1], NPV 82.8% [77.9-86.8] vs. 85.2% [80.0-89.2], positive LR 6.3 [2.8-14.6] vs. 6.7 [3.4-3.3], negative LR 0.81 [0.71-0.93] vs. 0.68 [0.55-0.83]) and wide confidence intervals. Negative post-test probability remained high (16.7% vs. 14.0%).

CONCLUSION

Antenatal placental assessment may improve identification of RFM pregnancies at highest risk of adverse pregnancy outcome but further work is required to understand and refine currently available outcome definitions and diagnostic techniques to improve clinical utility.

Comparison of diameter-based and image-based measures of surface area from gross placental pathology for use in epidemiologic studies

Placental surface area is often estimated using diameter measurements. However, as many placentas are not elliptical, we were interested in the validity of these estimates. We compared placental surface area from images for 491 singletons from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) Study (416 live births, 75 stillbirths) to estimates obtained using diameter measurements. Placental images and diameters were obtained from pathologic assessments conducted for the SCRN Study and images were analyzed using ImageJ software. On average, diameter-based measures underestimated surface area by -5.58% (95% confidence interval: -30.23, 19.07); results were consistent for normal and abnormal shapes. The association between surface area and birthweight was similar for both measures. Thus, diameter-based surface area can be used to estimate placental surface area.

A placenta clinic approach to the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction

Effective detection and management of fetal growth restriction is relevant to all obstetric care providers. Models of best practice to care for these patients and their families continue to evolve. Since much of the disease burden in fetal growth restriction originates in the placenta, the concept of a multidisciplinary placenta clinic program, managed primarily within a maternal-fetal medicine division, has gained popularity. In this context, fetal growth restriction is merely one of many placenta-related disorders that can benefit from an interdisciplinary approach, incorporating expertise from specialist perinatal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, reproductive genetics, neonatal pediatrics, internal medicine subspecialties, perinatal pathology, and nursing. The accurate diagnosis and prognosis for women with fetal growth restriction is established by comprehensive clinical review and detailed sonographic evaluation of the fetus, combined with uterine artery Doppler and morphologic assessment of the placenta. Diagnostic accuracy for placenta-mediated fetal growth restriction may be enhanced by quantification of maternal serum biomarkers including placenta growth factor alone or combined with soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. Uterine artery Doppler is typically abnormal in most instances of early-onset fetal growth restriction and is associated with coexistent preeclampsia and underlying maternal vascular malperfusion pathology of the placenta. By contrast, rare but potentially more serious underlying placental diagnoses, such as massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition, chronic histiocytic intervillositis, or fetal thrombotic vasculopathy, may be associated with normal uterine artery Doppler waveforms. Despite minor variations in placental size, shape, and cord insertion, placental function remains, largely normal in the general population. Consequently, morphologic assessment of the placenta is not currently incorporated into current screening programs for placental complications. However, placental ultrasound can be diagnostic in the context of fetal growth restriction, for example in Breus' mole and triploidy, which in turn may enhance diagnosis and management. Several examples are illustrated in our figures and supplementary videos. Recent advances in the ability of multiparameter screening and intervention programs to reduce the risk of severe preeclampsia will likely increase efforts to deliver similar improvements for women at risk of fetal growth restriction. Placental pathology is important because the underlying pathologies associated with fetal growth restriction have a wide range of recurrence risks. Rare conditions such as massive perivillous fibrinoid deposition or chronic histolytic intervillositis may recur in >50% of subsequent pregnancies. Postpartum care in a placenta-focused program can provide effective counseling for modifiable maternal risk factors, and can assist in planning future pregnancy care based on the pathologic basis of fetal growth restriction.