2
|
Punches BE, Osuji E, Bischof JJ, Li-Sauerwine S, Young H, Lyons MS, Southerland LT. Patient perceptions of microaggressions and discrimination toward patients during emergency department care. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:1192-1200. [PMID: 37335980 PMCID: PMC11075179 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disparities in emergency department (ED) care based on race and ethnicity have been demonstrated. Patient perceptions of emergency care can have broad impacts, including poor health outcomes. Our objective was to measure and explore patient experiences of microaggressions and discrimination during ED care. METHODS This mixed-methods study of adult patients from two urban academic EDs integrates quantitative discrimination measures and semistructured interviews of discrimination experiences during ED care. Participants completed demographic questionnaires and the Discrimination in Medical Settings (DMS) scale and were invited for a follow-up interview. Transcripts of recorded interviews were analyzed leveraging conventional content analysis with line-by-line coding for thematic descriptions. RESULTS The cohort included 52 participants, with 30 completing the interview. Nearly half the participants were Black (n = 24, 46.1%) and half were male (n = 26, 50%). "No" or "rare" experiences of discrimination during the ED visit were reported by 22/48 (46%), some/moderate discrimination by 19/48 (39%), and significant discrimination in 7/48 (15%). Five main themes were found: (1) clinician behaviors-communication and empathy, (2) emotional response to health care team actions, (3) perceived reasons for discrimination, (4) environmental pressures in the ED, and (5) patients are hesitant to complain. We found an emergent concept where persons with moderate/high DMS scores, in discussing instances of discrimination, frequently reflected on previous health care experiences rather than on their current ED visit. CONCLUSIONS Patients attributed microaggressions to many factors beyond race and gender, including age, socioeconomic status, and environmental pressures in the ED. Of those who endorsed moderate to significant discrimination via survey response during their recent ED visit, most described historical experiences of discrimination during their interview. Previous experiences of discrimination may have lasting effects on patient perceptions of current health care. System and clinician investment in patient rapport and satisfaction is important to prevent negative expectations for future encounters and counteract those already in place.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany E. Punches
- The Ohio State University College of Nursing, Columbus, Ohio, USA
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Evans Osuji
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jason J. Bischof
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Simiao Li-Sauerwine
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Henry Young
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael S. Lyons
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Lauren T. Southerland
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Punches BE, Brown JL, Taul NK, Sall HA, Bakas T, Gillespie GL, Martin-Boone JE, Boyer EW, Lyons MS. Patient motivators to use opioids for acute pain after emergency care. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1151704. [PMID: 37818444 PMCID: PMC10560756 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1151704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Patients are stakeholders in their own pain management. Factors motivating individuals to seek or use opioids therapeutically for treatment of acute pain are not well characterized but could be targeted to reduce incident iatrogenic opioid use disorder (OUD). Emergency departments (EDs) commonly encounter patients in acute pain for whom decisions regarding opioid therapy are required. Decision-making is necessarily challenged in episodic, unscheduled care settings given time pressure, limited information, and lack of pre-existing patient provider relationship. Patients may decline to take prescribed opioids or conversely seek opioids from other providers or non-medical sources. Methods Using a framework analysis approach, we qualitatively analyzed transcripts from 29 patients after discharge from an ED visit for acute pain at a large, urban, academic hospital in the midwestern United States to describe motivating factors influencing patient decisions regarding opioid use for acute pain. A semi-structured interview guide framed participant discussion in either a focus group or interview transcribed and analyzed with conventional content analysis. Results Four major themes emerged from our analysis including a) pain management literacy, b) control preferences, c) risk tolerance, and d) cues to action. Discussion Our findings suggest targets for future intervention development and a framework to guide the engagement of patients as stakeholders in their own acute pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany E. Punches
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Jennifer L. Brown
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States
| | - Natalie K. Taul
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Hawa A. Sall
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Tamilyn Bakas
- College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | | | | | - Edward W. Boyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Michael S. Lyons
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nguemeni Tiako MJ, Shofer F, Dolan A, Goldberg EB, Rhodes KV, Hess EP, Bellamkonda VR, Perrone J, Cannuscio CC, Becker L, Rodgers MA, Zyla MM, Bell JJ, McCollum S, Engel-Rebitzer E, Schapira MM, Meisel ZF. Personalized risk communication and opioid prescribing in association with nonprescribed opioid use: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Acad Emerg Med 2023; 30:851-858. [PMID: 36869633 DOI: 10.1111/acem.14710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To determine the impact of personalized risk communication and opioid prescribing on nonprescribed opioid use, we conducted a secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial participants followed prospectively for 90 days after an emergency department (ED) visit for acute back or kidney stone pain. METHODS A total of 1301 individuals were randomized during an encounter at four academic EDs into a probabilistic risk tool (PRT) arm, a narrative-enhanced PRT arm, or a general risk information arm (control). In this secondary analysis, both risk tool arms were combined and compared with the control arm. We used logistic regressions to determine associations between receiving personalized risk information, receiving an opioid prescription in the ED, and nonprescribed opioid use in general and by race. RESULTS Complete follow-up data were available for 851 participants; 23.3% (n = 198) were prescribed opioids (34.2% of White vs. 11.6% of Black participants, p < 0.001). Fifty-six (6.6%) participants used nonprescribed opioids. Participants in the personalized risk communication arms had lower nonprescribed opioid use odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4-0.83). Black versus White participants had greater nonprescribed opioid use odds (aOR 3.47, 95% CI 2.05-5.87, p < 0.001). Black participants who were prescribed opioids had a lower marginal probability of using nonprescribed opioids versus those who were not (0.06, 95% CI 0.04-0.08, p < 0.001 vs. 0.10, 95% CI 0.08-0.11, p < 0.001). The absolute risk difference in nonprescribed opioid use for Black and White participants, respectively, in the risk communication versus the control arm, was 9.7% and 0.1% (relative risk ratio 0.43 vs. 0.95). CONCLUSIONS Among Black but not White participants, personalized opioid risk communication and opioid prescribing were associated with lower odds of nonprescribed opioid use. Our findings suggest that racial disparities in opioid prescribing-which have been previously described within the context of this trial-may paradoxically increase nonprescribed opioid use. Personalized risk communication may effectively reduce nonprescribed opioid use, and future research should be designed specifically to explore this possibility in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Jordan Nguemeni Tiako
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Frances Shofer
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Abby Dolan
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Erica B Goldberg
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karin V Rhodes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Erik P Hess
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Venkatesh R Bellamkonda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeanmarie Perrone
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Carolyn C Cannuscio
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA
- Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lance Becker
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York, USA
| | - Melissa A Rodgers
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael M Zyla
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Bell
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sharon McCollum
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eden Engel-Rebitzer
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marilyn M Schapira
- Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zachary F Meisel
- Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|