Sonographic measurements of the ulnar nerve at the elbow with different degrees of elbow flexion

Dynamic analysis of the ulnar nerve and cubital tunnel morphology using ultrasonography: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

The causes of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow are unclear. The authors hypothesized that the humeral trochlea protrudes into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion and causes a dynamic morphologic change of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel.

METHODS

An ultrasonic probe was fixed to the ulnar shafts of 10 fresh cadavers with an external fixator, and dynamic morphology of the cubital tunnel and ulnar nerve was observed. The distance from the Osborne band to the trochlea (OTD), distance from ulnar nerve center to the trochlea (UTD), and the short- and long-axis diameters of the nerve at 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° of elbow flexion were recorded. We compared the OTD, UTD, and the flattening of the ulnar nerve at the different angles of flexion using single-factor analysis of variance. Correlation between the ulnar nerve flattering, OTD, and UTD was examined using Spearman correlation coefficient. A P value less than .05 was used to denote statistical significance.

RESULTS

Flattening of the ulnar nerve progressed with increasing elbow flexion and was significantly different between 0° and 60°, 90°, and 120° (P = .03 at 60°, P < .01 at 90° and 120°). OTD decreased with elbow flexion, and there was a significant difference at all elbow flexion angles (all P < .01). UTD decreased significantly from 0° flexion to 90° flexion (P = .03). Flattening of the nerve was significantly correlated with the OTD (r = 0.66, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive correlation was found between the protrusion of the humeral trochlea into the cubital tunnel during elbow flexion and ulnar nerve flattening using cadaveric elbow and ultrasonography.

Ulnar Neuropathy at the Elbow: From Ultrasound Scanning to Treatment

Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. It results from either static or dynamic compression of the ulnar nerve. While the retroepicondylar groove and its surrounding structures are quite superficial, the use of ultrasound (US) imaging is associated with the following advantages: (1) an excellent spatial resolution allows a detailed morphological assessment of the ulnar nerve and adjacent structures, (2) dynamic imaging represents the gold standard for assessing the ulnar nerve stability in the retroepicondylar groove during flexion/extension, and (3) US guidance bears the capability of increasing the accuracy and safety of injections. This review aims to illustrate the ulnar nerve's detailed anatomy at the elbow using cadaveric images to understand better both static and dynamic imaging of the ulnar nerve around the elbow. Pathologies covering ulnar nerve instability, idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome, space-occupying lesions (e.g., ganglion, heterotopic ossification, aberrant veins, and anconeus epitrochlearis muscle) are presented. Additionally, the authors also exemplify the scientific evidence from the literature supporting the proposition that US guidance is beneficial in injection therapy of UNE. The non-surgical management description covers activity modifications, splinting, neuromobilization/gliding exercise, and physical agents. In the operative treatment description, an emphasis is put on two commonly used approaches-in situ decompression and anterior transpositions.

Sonographic Follow-Up of Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Undergoing in Situ Open Neurolysis or Endoscopic Release: The SPECTRE Study

Background:The measurement of cross-sectional area (CSA) is a diagnostic tool to detect entrapments syndrome. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome in elbows undergoing endoscopic and "in situ" open cubital tunnel release for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) using ultrasound-related changes in the largest CSA of the ulnar nerve. The purpose is to determine the association between clinical outcome and CSA. Methods: From May 2011 to April 2016, 60 patients with CuTS were prospectively followed and not randomly divided in two groups: 30 patients undergoing an endoscopic release (ER) and 30 patients with "in situ" open neurolysis (OR). A sonographic examination was performed by the senior authors at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgical decompression. Results: CSA values were statistically significantly lower in the ER. Hand grip strength difference with Jamar test was not statistically significant a 12 months (39 kg vs 27 kg). Static-2 point discrimination test difference was only statistically significant lower in the endoscopic group at 3, 6 and 12 months but not clinically relevant (5 mm vs 6 mm). The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons-Elbow questionnaire (ASES-e) function score, ASES-e Pain score, and ASES-e Satisfaction score were not statistically significant different between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months post operatively. Conclusions: The study confirms that in spite of lower values of CSA in the ER, there is not a statistically significant difference between the two techniques in terms of subjective outcomes. Ultrasound (US) measurements seem to have a limited value in clinical results of patients treated for entrapment neuropathy of the ulnar nerve.Type of study/LOE: Prognostic Level III.