Predictors of Receiving a Prosthesis for Adults With Above-Knee Amputations in a Well-Defined Population

Applying mobility prediction models to real-world patients with major amputations

BACKGROUND

Outcome prediction models (PMs) have become commonplace and are promoted to aid in counseling patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of existing mobility PMs for post-major amputation (MA) patients in a real-world, socioeconomically disadvantaged population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with MA secondary to peripheral arterial disease from 2016 to 2022 was performed. Patients who were nonambulatory before MA or with contralateral MA were excluded. Three published PMs were investigated: (1) AmpPredict (predicts 1-year mobility), (2) Amputee Single Item Mobility Measure, (predicts degree of mobility with prosthesis at 1 year), both derived from Veteran's Affairs data, and (3) a Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) data-derived model (predicts 1-year mobility). Predicted mobility rates vs actual mobility rates were compared.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 126 patients, 71% male, 60% non-White race, with a mean state Area Deprivation Index of 9 of 10. Baseline characteristics were significantly different between the study and derivation cohorts. Actual mobility at 1 year was 43%. Of the 38 patients with an AmpPredict 1-year mobility of ≥70%, 45% actually achieved mobility. Of 101 patients with a high predicted probability from the VQI score (≥71%), 48% achieved mobility. The mean difference between AmpPredict and VQI for a given patient was 36% (range, 1%-81%). The Amputee Single Item Mobility Measure predicted 87% of patients would be community (vs home) ambulators at 1 year and 32% of patients actually achieved community ambulation (sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 14%, positive predictive value of 33%, and negative predictive value of 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

Published models dramatically overestimated the likelihood of mobility in our patient cohort. This result may be related to the demographics and comorbidities of our cohort being significantly different from the derivation cohorts. We recommend caution when applying PMs to a population with significantly different characteristics from the population used to derive the model.

Racial disparities in prosthesis abandonment and mobility outcomes after lower limb amputation from a dysvascular etiology in a veteran population

BACKGROUND

Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) individuals have higher rates of amputation and increased risk of a transfemoral amputation due to dysvascular disease than non-Hispanic White (NHW) individuals. However, it is unclear if NHB individuals have differences in prosthesis use or functional outcomes following an amputation.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there are racial disparities in prosthesis abandonment and mobility outcomes in veterans who have undergone their first major unilateral lower extremity amputation (LEA) due to diabetes and/or peripheral artery disease.

DESIGN

National cohort study that identified individuals retrospectively through the Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW) from March 1, 2018, to November 30, 2020, then prospectively collected their self-reported prosthesis abandonment and mobility. Multiple logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders and identify potential effect modifiers.

SETTING

The VA CDW, participant mailings and phone calls.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred fifty-seven individuals who underwent an incident transtibial or transfemoral amputation due to diabetes and/or peripheral arterial disease.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

(1) Self-reported prosthesis abandonment. (2) Level of mobility assessed using the Locomotor Capabilities Index.

RESULTS

Rurally located NHB individuals without a major depressive disorder (MDD) had increased odds of abandoning their prosthesis (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 5.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.3-21.1]). This disparity was nearly three times as large for rurally located NHB individuals with MDD diagnosis, compared with other races from rural areas and with MDD (aOR = 15.8; 95% CI, 2.5-97.6). NHB individuals living in an urban area were significantly less likely to achieve advanced mobility, both with MDD (aOR=0.16; 95% CI: [0.04-7.0]) and without MDD (aOR = 0.26; 95% CI: [0.09-0.73]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that health care disparities persist for NHB veterans following a dysvascular LEA, with increased prosthesis abandonment and worse mobility outcomes.

Creation of a Limb Loss and Preservation Registry for Improving the Quality of Patient Care in the United States

Objective

To describe the development of a national Limb Loss and Preservation Registry (LLPR) designed to collect, standardize, and report patient outcomes data on limb loss and limb difference in the United States.

Design

Clinical Data Registry.

Setting

The LLPR was developed through consensus of key stakeholders from academia, industry, patient advocacy, and payers as well as the available scientific evidence. Data are collected from multiple sources, including hospitals, providers, and patients.

Participants

Data are collected from all 50 states.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

More than 1100 trigger codes are used to identify patients who have limb difference or have received a limb preservation or amputation procedure. Once a patient is identified, all subsequent episodes of care are collected for the life of the patient. An integrated model is used for collecting, validating, cleaning, transforming, aggregating, and storing the data received from all sources. The information contained is then provided in a thorough and easily comprehensible manner.

Results

To date, the LLPR has captured data from >435,000 patients and >11.5 million episodes of care.

Conclusions

The LLPR creates opportunities to apply large-data analytical methodologies to provides caregivers, researchers, manufacturers, payers, and policy makers the tools needed to improve the quality of clinical care, quantify patient-centric outcomes, develop clinical practice guidelines, assess patient quality of life, identify appropriate technology, and guide creation of national policies to allocate scarce sources appropriately.

The Gritti-Stokes Amputation: Is It Still a Reliable Technique in the 21st Century? A Narrative Review

Lower limb amputation is a common surgical procedure performed worldwide. Many individuals require amputation due to various circumstances, with amputations occurring above or below the knee. Surgeons rely on published research to determine the most appropriate technique based on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. The Gritti-Stokes amputation (GSA) procedure, introduced in 1857, has shown positive results in terms of primary wound healing, reduced mortality rates during and after surgery, and accelerated healing and mobility. However, due to the need for highly trained surgeons and limitations in functional and cosmetic prosthesis fitting, concerns have been raised regarding its utility. Additionally, the procedure is underutilized in cases where it could potentially yield better results. This article provides a comprehensive review of the documented benefits of GSA, suitable candidate selection, limitations, various modifications, and a comparison with traditional approaches to lower limb amputation. The review is focused on evidence published in the last 100 years.

The effect of depression on prosthesis prescription in men and women who have undergone a lower limb amputation

PURPOSE

To determine gender disparities and potential factors that modify prosthesis prescription practices in veteran patients who have undergone their first major unilateral amputation due to diabetes or peripheral arterial disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the VA Corporate Data Warehouse to compare prosthesis prescription rates and time to prescription between men and women veterans. The primary exposure was gender. The primary outcome was a qualifying prosthesis prescription within 12 months of the incident amputation. The secondary outcome was time to prosthesis prescription. Multiple logistic and linear regression was used to control for potential confounders and identify potential effect modification.

RESULTS

2,862 individuals met study criteria, with 1690 (60%) prescribed a qualifying prosthesis. Men were more likely to receive a prosthesis prescription than women (59% versus 45%, respectively; p = 0.03). This difference was observed primarily among those with a diagnosis of major depressive disorder. In this subgroup, the odds of men receiving a prosthesis over women was over 3 times (adjusted odds ratio = 3.3; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.5, 7.4). Men had a mean shorter time to prescription compared to women (112 ± 72 versus 136 ± 79 days, respectively, p = 0.08).

Depression in women negatively impacts their prosthesis prescription rates and time to prescription compared to men. This disparity may have significant impacts on future function and quality of life.Implications for RehabilitationThis study found that men more commonly received a prosthesis prescription and received it earlier than women.This disparity was most extreme among women who had been diagnosed with major depressive disorder.Providers should identify at risk patients early and consider targeted interventions to address depression during the preoperative and immediate postoperative phases.Future research should continue to work to identify gender-specific needs that exacerbate disparity.

Community-wide feasibility of the Lower Extremity Amputation Protocol amongst vascular amputees

BACKGROUND

The Lower Extremity Amputation Protocol (LEAP) is a multidisciplinary enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for vascular amputees. The objective of this study was to examine feasibility and outcomes of community-wide implementation of LEAP.

METHODS

LEAP was implemented at three safety net hospitals for patients with peripheral artery disease or diabetes requiring major lower extremity amputation. Patients who underwent LEAP (LEAP) were matched 1:1 with retrospective controls (NOLEAP) on hospital location, need for initial guillotine amputation, and final amputation type (above- vs below-knee). Primary endpoint was postoperative hospital length of stay (PO-LOS).

RESULTS

A total of 126 amputees (63 LEAP and 63 NOLEAP) were included with no difference between baseline demographics and co-morbidities between the groups. After matching, both groups had the same prevalence of amputation level (76% below-knee vs 24% above-knee). LEAP patients had shorter duration of postamputation bed rest (P = .003) and were more likely to receive limb protectors (100% vs 40%; P ≤ .001), prosthetic counseling (100% vs 14%; P ≤ .001), perioperative nerve blocks (75% vs 25%; P ≤ .001), and postoperative gabapentin (79% vs 50%; P ≤ .001). Compared with NOLEAP, LEAP patients were more likely to be discharged to an acute rehabilitation facility (70% vs 44%; P = .009) and less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (14% vs 35%; P = .009). The median PO-LOS for the overall cohort was 4 days. LEAP patients had a shorter median PO-LOS (3 [interquartile range, 2-5] vs 5 [interquartile range, 4-9] days; P < .001). On multivariable logistic regression, LEAP decreased the odds of a PO-LOS of ≥4 days by 77% (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.63). Overall, LEAP patients were significantly less likely to have phantom limb pain (5% vs 21%; P = .02) and were more likely to receive a prosthesis (81% vs 40%; P ≤ .001). In a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, LEAP was associated with an 84% reduction in time to receipt of prosthesis (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.085-0.303; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Community wide implementation of LEAP significantly improved outcomes for vascular amputees demonstrating that utilization of core ERAS principles in vascular patients leads to decreased PO-LOS and improved pain control. LEAP also affords this socioeconomically disadvantaged population a greater opportunity to receive a prosthesis and return to the community as a functional ambulator.

Differences in Prosthetic Prescription Between Men and Women Veterans After Transtibial or Transfemoral Lower-Extremity Amputation: A Longitudinal Cohort Study (2005-2018)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether prosthetic prescription differed by gender and the extent to which differences were mediated by measured factors.

DESIGN

Retrospective longitudinal cohort study using data from Veterans Health Administration (VHA) administrative databases.

SETTING

VHA patients throughout the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

The sample included 20,889 men and 324 women who had an incident transtibial or transfemoral amputation between 2005 and 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Time to prosthetic prescription (up to 1 year). We used parametric survival analysis (an accelerated failure time model) to assess gender differences. We estimated mediation effects of amputation level, pain comorbidity burden, medical comorbidities, depression, and marital status on time to prescription.

RESULTS

In the 1 year after amputation, the proportion of women (54.3%) and men (55.7%) prescribed a prosthesis was similar. However, after we controlled for age, race, ethnicity, enrollment priority, VHA region, and service-connected disability, the time to prosthetic prescription was significantly faster among men compared with women (acceleration factor=0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.87). The difference in time to prosthetic prescription between men and women was significantly mediated by amputation level (23%), pain comorbidity burden (-14%), and marital status (5%) but not medical comorbidities or depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the proportion of patients with prosthetic prescription at 1-year postamputation was similar between men and women, women received prosthetic prescriptions more slowly than men, suggesting that more work is needed to understand barriers to timely prosthetic prescriptions among women, and how to intervene to reduce those barriers.

Stability and Falls Evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 2): Reduced functional mobility is associated with a history of injurious falls in lower limb prosthesis users

BACKGROUND

Injurious falls have a high cost and economic impact on an individual and the health system. Several studies have assessed performance-based functional mobility in lower limb prosthesis (LLP) users and fall risk including fall history. However, limited data exist regarding the relationship between functional mobility and a history of injurious falls in individuals who use a LLP. Such information could inform clinical practice and decision making from prosthesis design to policy. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with a history of injurious falls among LLP users using a clinical outcomes database.

METHODS

Retrospective (2016-2018) observational study. Logistic regression applied.

RESULTS

A final sample of 12,044 LLP users was included for analysis. Within the sample, 1,529 individuals reported a history of an injurious fall within the previous 6 months. Self-reported functional mobility was stratified into low, middle, and high levels: differences were found between levels for history of an injurious fall. The lowest mobility level was associated with 2.29 higher odds of a history of an injurious fall (95% CI: 1.96-2.69) indicating a potentially greater serious fall risk compared to those with higher mobility levels while controlling for covariates (sex, cause of amputation and level of amputation).

CONCLUSION(S)

Self-reported functional mobility was associated with a history of injurious falls in LLP users. The Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility is an accessible tool that prosthetists could use to identify individuals with a high risk of falls; this can inform care planning. Rehabilitation plans and prosthesis designs that target LLP users who report low functional mobility may positively impact health outcomes.

Sex and gender differences in quality of life and related domains for individuals with adult acquired lower-limb amputation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

To understand what is known about sex and gender differences in quality of life (QoL) and related domains for individuals with an adult acquired lower limb amputation (LLA).

METHODS

A computer-assisted literature search of four online databases was completed. Articles were included if they incorporated sex or gender as part of their data analysis with a focus on QoL-related domains. Data were analyzed using descriptive numerical analysis and thematic analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven articles were included in this review. Women were under-represented across studies, with most of the participants being men. No articles described the inclusion of trans or non-binary persons. Differences by sex or gender were reported by 66 articles. Articles reporting on gender seldom provided descriptions of how gender was defined. Overall, women/females seemed to have worse outcomes in terms of prosthesis-related outcomes, mental health, and return to occupations.

CONCLUSION

Articles included in this review were not clear with how gender was defined. In order for more targeted interventions that account for sex and gender differences, studies need to be more forthcoming about how they use and define gender. Future research should seek to include gender non-conforming participants to identify additional needs.Implications for rehabilitationSex and gender are important constructs that influence outcomes following lower limb amputation.Rehabilitation professionals should consider sex and gender-specific outcomes when tailoring programs to ensure ethical clinical care.

A prospective assessment of an adjustable, immediate fit, subischial transfemoral prosthesis

Objective

To assess the feasibility of an adjustable, subischial transfemoral prosthesis by comparing self-reported outcome measures regarding socket comfort, fit and utility relative to a persons’ conventionally made socket. Assessing limb compressibility was another aim of this study.

Design

A single-group pre-post intervention design.

Setting

Physical medicine and rehabilitation biomechanics laboratory.

Participants

All 18 enrolled participants (N = 18) completed the feasibility trial. There were 16 men and 2 women with an average age of 59.4 (±7) years. Most of the participants (61.1%) had worn a socket for 1 to 10 years before the trial, 22.2% of the participants had worn one for less than a year, and 16.7% of the participants had worn a prosthesis for more than 10 years.

Intervention

Participants were fit with the study prosthesis and used it for a 2-week home trial.

Main Outcome Measures

A Prosthetic Comfort and Utility Questionnaire was completed on the participant's conventional prosthetic device and the subischial socket system after the trial.

Results

The adjustable subischial prostheses were rated superior overall to the participant's conventional sockets (40.9 ± 7.2 vs 32.8 ± 10.8; P=.004). Six of the 10 parameters measured (adjustability, overall fit, prosthesis weight, sitting comfort, standing comfort, and standing stability) were rated higher for the adjustable prostheses compared to the conventional sockets. Compression of the soft tissues of the thigh ranged from 5.6 ± 4.2 cm at the distal end to 7.3 ± 3.6 cm at the proximal site. There were no falls, skin breakdown, or limb ischemia. At the 2-month telephone follow-up, 61% of subjects had transitioned to using the adjustable subischial socket most of the time.

Conclusions

The adjustable, immediate fit, subischial prosthesis provided safe, comfortable, and functional ambulation for persons with transfemoral limb loss in this short-term feasibility study. This study supports the consideration of a new paradigm in transfemoral prosthetics—adjustable subischial sockets. These devices should be tested in a larger multi-center study.

Factors that Influence Time to Prosthesis Receipt after Lower Limb Amputation: A Cox Proportional Hazard Model Regression

INTRODUCTION

Early mobility, functional independence, and ambulation are associated benefits after LLA, while an increased risk of clinical complications is associated with no prosthesis.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to describe time to prosthesis receipt after amputation and to assess the impact of patient demographic and health factors on the rate of prosthesis receipt within 12 months post-LLA.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort analysis using commercial administrative claims data. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional-hazards models were applied to assess time to prosthesis receipt.

SETTING

Watson/Truven administrative database 2014-2016.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults age 18-64 with LLA who maintained their current insurance enrollment for 12 months after amputation.

INTERVENTIONS

Independent variables included diabetes/vascular disease status, amputation level, age, sex, and region.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Prosthesis receipt was defined based on the presence of codes billed for prosthesis services. Time was measured in days from date of amputation surgery.

RESULTS

Among the sample, 510 individuals maintained enrollment for 12 months post-amputation, of which 443 individuals received a prosthesis within that period (79% BK and 21% AK). The adjusted average rate of time to prosthesis receipt was 138 (95% CI: 113-185) days. Individuals with diabetes/vascular disease were 22% (HR: 1.22 95% CI: 1.02-1.49) more likely to receive a prosthesis earlier than individuals without diabetes/vascular disease and females received a prosthesis later than males at 141 (95% CI: 126-162) days vs 106 (95% CI: 96-119) days, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study expands the understanding of factors that influence the likelihood of receiving a prosthesis along with the timing of prosthesis receipt after LLA among commercially insured adults. At least half of this sample received a prosthesis within 5 months or less. Disparities in timing and access to a prosthesis based on amputation level and sex were noted, future efforts are needed to address these issues. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Effectiveness of physical activity interventions in older adults with frailty or prefrailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:

Methods:

Results:

Interpretation:

PROSPERO registration:

Development of a physical mobility prediction model to guide prosthetic rehabilitation

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic rehabilitation decisions depend on estimating a patient's mobility potential. However, no validated prediction models of mobility outcomes exist for people with lower-limb amputation (LLA).

OBJECTIVES

To develop and test predictions for self-reported mobility after LLA, using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirty-one patient records (1,860 PLUS-M observations) were used to develop and test a neighbors-based prediction model, using previous patient data to predict the 6-month PLUS-M T-score trajectory for a new patient (based on matching characteristics). The prediction model was developed in a training data set (n = 552 patients) and tested in an out-of-sample data set of 279 patients with later visit dates. Prediction performance was assessed using bias, coverage, and precision. Prediction calibration was also assessed.

RESULTS

The average prediction bias for the model was 0.01 SDs, average coverage was 0.498 (ideal proportion within the 50% prediction interval = 0.5), and prediction interval was 8.4 PLUS-M T-score points (40% improvement over population-level estimates). Predictions were well calibrated, with the median predicted scores falling within the standard error of the median of observed scores, across all deciles of the data.

CONCLUSIONS

This neighbors-based prediction approach allows for accurate estimates of PLUS-M T-score trajectories for people with LLA.

Symmetry function in gait pattern analysis in patients after unilateral transfemoral amputation using a mechanical or microprocessor prosthetic knee

BACKGROUND

Above-knee amputations (AKAs) contribute to gait asymmetry. The level of asymmetry is affected by the type of knee prosthetic module. There is limited evidence suggesting that more technically advanced solutions (microprocessor modules; MicPK) are superior to less advanced ones (mechanical modules; MechPK). The study aimed to evaluate the variable range of hip and pelvic joint movements during gait and look for differentiating areas with an increased level of asymmetry of the gait cycle in individuals who underwent an AKA and are equipped with MicPK or MechPK.

METHODS

Twenty-eight individuals participated in the study; 14 were assigned to a study group of individuals who underwent a unilateral AKA, and the other 14 were healthy participants as a control group. The movement task was recorded using the optoelectronic SMART-E system following the standard Davis protocol (the Newington model). A new method of quantifying gait symmetry using the symmetry function (SF) is proposed. SF is an integral measure of absolute differences in time-standardized signals between sides throughout the whole cycle of motion variability.

RESULTS

In the frontal plane, there were significant differences between groups in the asymmetry of the range of movement in the hip joint of the intact limb. In the middle of the support phase, the intact limb was more adducted in individuals with MicPK and less abducted in people with MechPK (differences in mean 180%, p < 0.000; max 63%, p < 0.000; min 65%, p < 0.000). In the sagittal plane, the range of asymmetry of the flexion and thigh extension of the intact limb was similar to and only slightly different from the physiological gait. In the transverse plane, higher asymmetry values were noted for individuals with MicPK. In the final stage of the swing phase, the thigh was more rotated both externally and internally. The size of the asymmetry, when compared to gait of healthy individuals, reached 50% (differences in mean 115%, p < 0.232; max 62% p < 0.26; min 50, p < 0.154).

CONCLUSIONS

In the study group, the assessed ranges of pelvic and thigh movement in the hip joint differed only in the frontal plane. Individuals who underwent a unilateral above-knee amputation may gain less from using MicPK than anticipated.

Traumatic Injuries are the Main Indication for Limb Amputations During and After Humanitarian Crises

BACKGROUND

Populations at risk during humanitarian crises can suffer traumatic injuries or have medical conditions that result in the need for limb amputation (LA). The objectives of this study were to describe the indications for and associations with LA during and after humanitarian crises in surgical projects supported by Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF).

METHODS

MSF-Operational Center Brussels data from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2017, were analyzed. Surgical projects were classified into (annual) periods of crises and post-crises. Indications were classified into trauma (intentional and unintentional) and non-trauma (medical). Associations with LA were also reported.

RESULTS

MSF-OCB performed 936 amputations in 17 countries over the 10-year study period. 706 (75%) patients were male and the median age was 27 years (interquartile range 17-41 years). Six hundred and twenty-one (66%) LA were performed during crisis periods, 501 (53%) during conflict and 119 (13%) post-natural disaster. There were 316 (34%) LA in post-crisis periods. Overall, trauma was the predominant indication (n = 756, 81%) and accounted for significantly more LA (n = 577, 94%) in crisis compared to post-crisis periods (n = 179, 57%) (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Our study suggests that populations at risk for humanitarian crises are still vulnerable to traumatic LA. Appropriate operative and post-operative LA management in the humanitarian setting must be provided, including rehabilitation and options for prosthetic devices.

The Role of Earlier Receipt of a Lower Limb Prosthesis on Emergency Department Utilization

Introduction

Adverse events after a lower limb amputation (LLA) can negatively affect the rehabilitation process and may lead to emergency department (ED) visits. Earlier receipt of a prosthesis, as compared to delayed or not receiving a prosthesis, may decrease or moderate the risk of increased ED utilization. In addition, adverse events (ie, fall‐related injury [FRI]) may be associated with increased health care utilization as measured by ED use. The implication of the timing of prosthesis provision after amputation and reduced ED use is not well established. Obtaining data about ED utilization early post‐LLA could assist the rehabilitation team in ensuring timely and appropriate access to improve outcomes.

Objective

To determine the role that timing of prosthesis receipt has in ED utilization and the association of fall/FRI with health care utilization.

Design

Retrospective observational cohort using commercial claims data. A logistic regression model was used to assess factors that influence ED utilization post‐LLA.

Setting

Watson/Truven administrative database 2014 to 2016.

Participants

The study sample consisted of 510 adults age 18 to 64 years with continuous enrollment for 3 years.

Interventions

Independent variables included age, sex, diabetes status, amputation level, fall diagnosis, and prosthesis receipt. Fall was defined as presence of a diagnosis code in any outpatient procedure after the amputation date.

Main Outcome Measure

ED use after amputation was defined as the presence of procedure codes that billed for ED services (99281 to 99285).

Results

Individuals who receive a prosthesis early, within 0 to 3 months, post‐LLA were 48% (odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28 to 0.97) less likely to use the ED compared to those who did not receive a prosthesis. Individuals who experienced a fall/FRI had 2.8 (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.23 to 6.66) times the odds of ED utilization.

Conclusion

Receipt of a prosthesis reduces the risk of ED use. The current study underscores the value of prostheses during the rehabilitation process after LLA.

Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of the microprocessor-controlled knee C-Leg in transfemoral amputees with and without diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The safe use of a prosthesis in activities of daily living is key for transfemoral amputees. However, the number of falls varies significantly between different prosthetic device types. This study aims to compare medical and economic consequences of falls in transfemoral amputees who use the microprocessor-controlled knee joint C-Leg with patients who use non-microprocessor-controlled (mechanical) knee joints (NMPK). The main objectives of the analysis are to investigate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of C-Legs in transfemoral amputees with diabetes mellitus (DM) and without DM in Germany.

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed that took into account the effects of prosthesis type on the risk of falling and fall-related medical events. Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses were performed separately for transfemoral amputees with and without DM. The study took the perspective of the statutory health insurance (SHI). Input parameters were derived from the published literature. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed to investigate the impact of changes in individual input parameter values on model outcomes and to explore parameter uncertainty.

RESULTS

C-Legs reduced the rate of fall-related hospitalizations from 134 to 20 per 1000 person years (PY) in amputees without DM and from 146 to 23 per 1000 PY in amputees with DM. In addition, the C-Leg prevented 15 or 14 fall-related death per 1000 PY. Over a time horizon of 25 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 16,123 Euro per quality-adjusted life years gained (QALY) for amputees without DM and 20,332 Euro per QALY gained for amputees with DM. For the period of 2020-2024, the model predicted an increase in SHI expenditures of 98 Mio Euro (53 Mio Euro in prosthesis users without DM and 45 Mio Euro in prosthesis users with DM) when all new prosthesis users received C-Legs instead of NMPKs and 50% of NMPK user whose prosthesis wore out switched to C-Legs. Results of the PSA showed moderate uncertainty and a probability of 97-99% that C-Legs are cost-effective at an ICER threshold of 40,000 Euro (≈ German GDP per capita in 2018) per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

Results of the study suggest that the C-Leg provides substantial additional health benefits compared with NMPKs and is likely to be cost-effective in transfemoral amputees with DM as well as in amputees without DM at an ICER threshold of 40,000 Euro per QALY gained.

Low Back Pain in Adults With Transfemoral Amputation: A Retrospective Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is common among individuals with transfemoral amputation (TFA) and has a negative impact on quality of life. Little is known about health care utilization for LBP in this population and whether utilization varies by amputation etiology.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if individuals with TFA have an increased likelihood of seeking care or reporting symptoms of acute or chronic LBP during physician visits after amputation compared with matched individuals without amputation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Olmsted County, Minnesota (2010 population: 144 248).

PARTICIPANTS

All individuals with incident TFA (N = 96), knee disarticulation, and transfemoral amputation residing in Olmsted County between 1987 and 2014. Each was matched (1:10 ratio) with non-TFA adults on age, sex, and duration of residency. Individuals were divided by etiology of amputation: dysvascular and trauma/cancer.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Death and presentation for evaluation of LBP (LBP event) while residing in Olmsted County. LBP events were identified using validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and corresponding Berkson, Hospital International Classification of Diseases Adapted (HICDA), and ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Hurdle and competing-risk Cox proportional hazard models were used.

RESULTS

Having a TFA of either etiology did appear to correlate with increased frequency of LBP events, although this association was only statistically significant within the dysvascular TFA cohort (dysvascular TFA cohort: relative risk [RR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-3.03, median follow-up 0.78 years; trauma/cancer TFA cohort: RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.58-2.22, median follow-up 7.95 years). In time to event analysis, dysvascular TFA had an increased risk of death and event. Obesity did not significantly correlate with increased frequency of LBP events or time to event for either cohort. At any given point in time, individuals with TFA of either etiology who had phantom limb pain were 90% more likely to have an LBP event (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% CI 1.11-3.31). Conditional on not dying and no LBP event within the first 2.5 years, individuals with prosthesis had a decreased risk of LBP events in subsequent years.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk of LBP events appears to vary by TFA etiology. Obesity did not correlate significantly with increased frequency of LBP event or time to event. Phantom limb pain correlated with decreased time to LBP event after amputation. The association between prosthesis receipt and LBP events is ambiguous.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Prosthetic use by persons with unilateral transfemoral amputation in a South African setting

BACKGROUND

Due to limitations in provision of prosthetic care in South Africa, a screening tool to select transfemoral prosthetic candidates has been implemented.

OBJECTIVE

To describe prosthetic services, use and mobility of people with transfemoral amputation, identified as prosthetic candidates through the Guidelines for Screening of Prosthetic Candidates: Lower Limb, and to identify variables that might influence prosthetic use and mobility.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey.

METHODS

The study population included all adults who received their first prosthesis from the Orthotic and Prosthetic Centre in the Western Cape between 1 June 2011 and 31 December 2014. Data were collected, with an adapted version of the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee, from 43 participants, through telephonic interviews. Descriptive and inferential analysis, with the chi-square test, was done.

RESULTS

The majority of participants were older than 50 years (77%). Most participants (35; 81%) used their prosthesis; however, only 42% (18) used it daily. A significant association ( p = 0.000) was found between prosthetic rehabilitation and self-reported prosthetic walking distance. Less than half of participants received prosthetic rehabilitation and only 10 (30%) could walk 500 steps and more without resting.

CONCLUSION

Participants used their prosthetic leg, but experienced limitations in frequency of wear and mobility.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Current findings showed that participants' prosthetic mobility was curtailed. In less-resourced settings, carefully selecting prosthetic candidates may be necessary to provide access to services. Prosthetic provision is advised to be followed up with prosthetic rehabilitation for favourable mobility outcomes.

The risk of major cardiovascular events for adults with transfemoral amputation

BACKGROUND

It is well-known that the risk of cardiac disease is increased for those with lower-limb amputations, likely as a result of the etiology of the amputation. Using a longitudinal population-based dataset, we examined the association between transfemoral amputation (TFA) status and the risk of experiencing a major cardiac event for those undergoing either dysvascular or traumatic amputations. The association of receiving a prosthesis with the risk of experiencing a major cardiac event was also examined.

METHODS

Study Population: All individuals with TFA (N 162), i.e. knee disarticulation and transfemoral amputation, residing in Olmsted County, MN, between 1987 and 2014. Each was matched (1:10 ratio) with non-TFA adults on age, sex, and duration of residency.

DATA ANALYSIS

A competing risk Cox proportional hazard model was used to estimate the relative likelihood of an individual with a TFA experiencing a major cardiac event in a given time period as compared to the matched controls. The cohort was divided by amputation etiology: dysvascular vs trauma/cancer. Additional analysis was performed by combining all individuals with a TFA to look at the relationship between prosthesis receipt and major cardiac events.

RESULTS

Individuals with a dysvascular TFA had an approximately four-fold increased risk of a cardiac event after undergoing an amputation (HR 3.78, 95%CI: 3.07-4.49). These individuals also had an increased risk for non-cardiac mortality (HR 6.27, 95%CI: 6.11-6.58). The risk of a cardiac event was no higher for those with a trauma/cancer TFA relative to the able-bodied controls (HR 1.30, 95%CI: 0.30-5.85). Finally, there was no difference in risk of experiencing a cardiac event for those with or without prosthesis (HR 1.20, 95%CI: 0.55-2.62).

CONCLUSION

The high risk of initial mortality stemming from an amputation event may preclude many amputees from cardiovascular disease progression. Amputation etiology is also an important factor: cardiac events appear to be more likely among patients with a dysvascular TFA. Providing a prosthesis does not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of a major cardiac event following amputation.

Suitability of 'Guidelines for Screening of Prosthetic Candidates: Lower Limb' for the Eastern Cape, South Africa: A qualitative study

Background

Major lower limb amputation has a severe impact on functional mobility. Mobility can be salvaged with a prosthesis, but this is not always the best option. It is often difficult to decide whether to refer someone for a prosthesis or not. A prosthetic screening tool 'Guidelines for Screening of Prosthetic Candidates: Lower Limb' was developed and is used for prosthetic prescription in parts of the Western Cape province of South Africa.

Objectives

This study aimed to explore the suitability of the tool 'Guidelines for Screening of Prosthetic Candidates: Lower Limb' for use in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa.

Method

A qualitative study was conducted with conveniently sampled occupational therapists (OTs) (n = 10), physiotherapists (PTs) (n = 12) and prosthetists (n = 6) in government employment in the Buffalo City Metro Municipality. Participants were trained in the use of the tool and used it for four weeks with patients. Their experiences of the tool were assessed through three focus group discussions with emergent themes being identified during inductive data analysis.

Findings

Participants indicated that the tool could assist with prosthetic prescription, goal setting, communication and teamwork. They thought that the tool was multidisciplinary in nature, comprehensive and practical. Findings showed a lack of teamwork in this study setting. Resistance to change and a lack of time might also hamper implementation of the tool.

Conclusion

The tool can assist with managing the backlog for prostheses and to guide prosthetic prescription in the Eastern Cape province.

Clinical implications

A prosthesis can help to salvage functional mobility after lower limb amputation. However, not all people who had above knee amputation manage to walk with a prosthesis. The tool reported on in this article provides information that can guide prosthetic prescription and rehabilitation goals.