Management of Patients with End-Stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Burden of pulmonary hypertension due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Analysis of exacerbations and healthcare resource utilization in the United States

BACKGROUND

The burden of pulmonary hypertension (PH) among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well understood. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic burden of PH in patients with COPD.

METHODS

Adults with COPD were retrospectively identified in the Optum® Clinformatics® Data Mart between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2021. Those diagnosed with PH were assigned to the PH-COPD cohort and those without a diagnosis of PH were assigned to the COPD cohort. Outcomes, including the number of visits for exacerbations and all-cause and COPD-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs per patient per month (PPPM), were compared between cohorts. Baseline and study outcomes were analyzed descriptively. For significance testing, continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-tests and categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square tests.

RESULTS

A total of 1627 patients with PH-COPD were matched 1:1 to COPD patients without PH. A greater percentage of PH-COPD patients experienced COPD exacerbations vs. the COPD cohort (p < 0.001) and the PH-COPD cohort had more total (p < 0.001) and severe exacerbation-related visits PPPM (p < 0.001). All-cause and COPD-related HCRU PPPM estimates were higher among the PH-COPD cohort vs. the COPD cohort (p < 0.01). Total all-cause (p < 0.001) and COPD-related costs (p < 0.001) were higher among PH-COPD patients than COPD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PH-COPD had higher rates of severe exacerbations, hospitalizations, and costs compared to COPD patients without PH, underscoring the need for targeted therapies to prevent and manage PH in patients with COPD.

Development, modelling, and pilot testing of a complex intervention to support end-of-life care provided by Danish general practitioners

BACKGROUND

Most patients in end-of-life with life-threatening diseases prefer to be cared for and die at home. Nevertheless, the majority die in hospitals. GPs have a pivotal role in providing end-of-life care at patients' home, and their involvement in the palliative trajectory enhances the patient's possibility to stay at home. The aim of this study was to develop and pilot-test an intervention consisting of continuing medical education (CME) and electronic decision support (EDS) to support end-of-life care in general practice.

METHODS

We developed an intervention in line with the first phases of the guidelines for complex interventions drawn up by the Medical Research Council. Phase 1 involved the development of the intervention including identification of key barriers to provision of end-of-life care for GPs and of facilitators of change. Furthermore the actual modelling of two components: CME meeting and EDS. Phase 2 focused on pilot-testing and intervention assessment by process evaluation.

RESULTS

In phase 1 lack of identification of patients at the end of life and limited palliative knowledge among GPs were identified as barriers. The CME meeting and the EDS were developed. The CME meeting was a four-hour educational meeting performed by GPs and specialists in palliative care. The EDS consisted of two parts: a pop-up window for each patient with palliative needs and a list of all patients with palliative needs in the practice. The pilot testing in phase 2 showed that the CME meeting was performed as intended and 120 (14%) of the GPs in the region attended. The EDS was integrated in existing electronic records but was shut down early for external reasons; 50 (5%) GPs signed up. The pilot-testing demonstrated a need to strengthen the implementation as attending rate was low in the current set-up.

CONCLUSION

We developed a complex intervention to support GPs in providing end-of-life care. The pilot-test showed general acceptance of the CME meetings. The EDS was shut down early and needs further evaluation before examining the whole intervention in a larger study, where evaluation could be based on patient-related outcomes and impact on end-of-life care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02050256 ) January 30, 2014.

Palliative care and prognosis in COPD: a systematic review with a validation cohort

Current recommendations to consider initiation of palliative care (PC) in COPD patients are often based on an expected poor prognosis. However, this approach is not evidence-based, and which and when COPD patients should start PC is controversial. We aimed to assess whether current suggested recommendations for initiating PC were sufficiently reliable. We identified prognostic variables proposed in the literature for initiating PC; then, we ascertained their relationship with 1-year mortality, and finally, we validated their utility in our cohort of 697 patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbation. From 24 articles of 499 screened, we selected 20 variables and retrieved 48 original articles in which we were able to calculate the relationship between each of them and 1-year mortality. The number of studies where 1-year mortality was detailed for these variables ranged from 9 for previous hospitalizations or FEV₁ ≤30% to none for albumin ≤25 mg/dL. The percentage of 1-year mortality in the literature for these variables ranged from 5% to 60%. In the validation cohort study, the prevalence of these proposed variables ranged from 8% to 64%; only 10 of the 18 variables analyzed in our cohort reached statistical significance with Cox regression analysis, and none overcame an area under the curve ≥0.7. We conclude that none of the suggested criteria for initiating PC based on an expected poor vital prognosis in COPD patients in the short or medium term offers sufficient reliability, and consequently, they should be avoided as exclusive criteria for considering PC or at least critically appraised.