1
|
D'Souza R, Seymour RJ, Knight M, Dzakpasu S, Joseph KS, Thorne S, Ospina MB, Barrett J, Cook J, Fell DB, Scott H, Metcalfe A, van den Akker T, Lapinsky S, Skeith L, Murray-Davis B, Shah P, Forte M, Ashraf R, Chundamala J, Hutchinson SA, Chen KK, Malhamé I. Feasibility of establishing a Canadian Obstetric Survey System (CanOSS) for severe maternal morbidity: a study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e061093. [PMID: 35321901 PMCID: PMC8943762 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Severe maternal morbidity (SMM)-an unexpected pregnancy-associated maternal outcome resulting in severe illness, prolonged hospitalisation or long-term disability-is recognised by many, as the preferred indicator of the quality of maternity care, especially in high-income countries. Obtaining comprehensive details on events and circumstances leading to SMM, obtained through maternity units, could complement data from large epidemiological studies and enable targeted interventions to improve maternal health. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of gathering such data from maternity units across Canadian provinces and territories, with the goal of establishing a national obstetric survey system for SMM in Canada. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We propose a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. We will first distribute a cross-sectional survey to leads of all maternity units across Canada to gather information on (1) Whether the unit has a system for reviewing SMM and the nature and format of this system, (2) Willingness to share anonymised data on SMM by direct entry using a web-based platform and (3) Respondents' perception on the definition and leading causes of SMM at a local level. This will be followed by semistructured interviews with respondent groups defined a priori, to identify barriers and facilitators for data sharing. We will perform an integrated analysis to determine feasibility outcomes, a narrative description of barriers and facilitators for data-sharing and resource implications for data acquisition on an annual basis, and variations in top-5 causes of SMM. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Mount Sinai and Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Boards. The study findings will be presented at annual scientific meetings of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, North American Society of Obstetric Medicine, and International Network of Obstetric Survey Systems and published in an open-access peer-reviewed Obstetrics and Gynaecology or General Internal Medicine journal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan D'Souza
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca J Seymour
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marian Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Susie Dzakpasu
- Maternal and Infant Health Section, Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - K S Joseph
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- The University of British Columbia School of Population and Public Health, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sara Thorne
- Division of Cardiology, Pregnancy & Heart Disease Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria B Ospina
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jon Barrett
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jocelynn Cook
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deshayne B Fell
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather Scott
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Amy Metcalfe
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, and Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Athena Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen Lapinsky
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Leslie Skeith
- Division of Hematology and Hematological Malignancies, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beth Murray-Davis
- McMaster Midwifery Research Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Prakesh Shah
- Department of Pediatrics, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Milena Forte
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rizwana Ashraf
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Josie Chundamala
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah A Hutchinson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kenneth K Chen
- Departments of Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Isabelle Malhamé
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schaap TP, van den Akker T, Zwart JJ, van Roosmalen J, Bloemenkamp KWM. A national surveillance approach to monitor incidence of eclampsia: The Netherlands Obstetric Surveillance System. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 98:342-350. [PMID: 30346039 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There have been many efforts in the last decade to decrease the incidence of eclampsia and its related complications in the Netherlands, such as lowering thresholds for treatment of hypertension and mandatory professional training. To determine the impact of these policy changes on incidence and outcomes, we performed a nationwide registration of eclampsia, 10 years after the previous registration. MATERIAL AND METHODS Cases of eclampsia were prospectively collected using the Netherlands Obstetric Surveillance System (NethOSS; 2013-2016) in all hospitals with a maternity unit in the Netherlands. Complete case file copies were obtained for comparative analysis of individual level data with the previous cohort (2004-2006). Primary outcome measure was incidence of eclampsia; main secondary outcomes were antihypertensive and magnesium sulfate use, and maternal and perinatal mortality. RESULTS NethOSS identified 88 women with eclampsia. The incidence decreased from 6.2/10 000 in 2004-2006 to 1.8/10 000 births (relative risk [RR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.36). Increases in the use of antihypertensive medication (61/82 vs 35/216; RR 18.4, 95% CI 9.74-34.70) and magnesium sulfate treatment (82/82 vs 201/216; RR 1.08, 95% CI 1.04-1.12) were observed. There was one intrauterine death following termination of pregnancy. No cases of neonatal mortality were reported in NethOSS compared with 11 in the LEMMoN. Maternal death occurred in one woman compared vs three in the previous registration. CONCLUSIONS There has been a strong reduction of eclampsia and associated perinatal mortality in the Netherlands over the last decade. Management changes and increased awareness may have contributed to this reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timme P Schaap
- Department of Obstetrics, Birth Center Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas van den Akker
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Joost J Zwart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - Jos van Roosmalen
- Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Athena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kitty W M Bloemenkamp
- Department of Obstetrics, Birth Center Wilhelmina's Children Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schaap T, Bloemenkamp K, Deneux-Tharaux C, Knight M, Langhoff-Roos J, Sullivan E, van den Akker T. Defining definitions: a Delphi study to develop a core outcome set for conditions of severe maternal morbidity. BJOG 2017; 126:394-401. [PMID: 28755459 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop a core outcome set of international consensus definitions for severe maternal morbidities. DESIGN Electronic Delphi study. SETTING International. POPULATION Eight expert panels. METHODS All 13 high-income countries represented in the International Network of Obstetric Surveillance Systems (INOSS) nominated five experts per condition of morbidity, who submitted possible definitions. From these suggestions, a steering committee distilled critical components: eclampsia: 23, amniotic fluid embolism: 15, pregnancy-related hysterectomy: 11, severe primary postpartum haemorrhage: 19, uterine rupture: 20, abnormally invasive placentation: 12, spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy: 16, and cardiac arrest in pregnancy: 10. These components were assessed by the expert panel using a 5-point Likert scale, following which a framework for an encompassing definition was constructed. Possible definitions were evaluated in rounds until a rate of agreement of more than 70% was reached. Expert commentaries were used in each round to improve definitions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Definitions with a rate of agreement of more than 70%. RESULTS The invitation to participate in one or more of eight Delphi processes was accepted by 103 experts from 13 high-income countries. Consensus definitions were developed for all of the conditions. CONCLUSION Consensus definitions for eight morbidity conditions were successfully developed using the Delphi process. These should be used in national registrations and international studies, and should be taken up by the Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health initiative. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Consensus definitions for eight morbidity conditions were successfully developed using the Delphi process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Schaap
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - K Bloemenkamp
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - C Deneux-Tharaux
- Obstetrical, Perinatal and Paediatric Epidemiology Research Team, Centre for Epidemiology and Statistics Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - M Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - J Langhoff-Roos
- Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - E Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - T van den Akker
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.,Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fitzpatrick KE, Tuffnell D, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Pregnancy at very advanced maternal age: a UK population-based cohort study. BJOG 2016; 124:1097-1106. [PMID: 27581343 PMCID: PMC5484369 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To describe the characteristics, management and outcomes of women giving birth at advanced maternal age (≥48 years). Design Population‐based cohort study using the UK Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS). Setting All UK hospitals with obstetrician‐led maternity units. Population Women delivering at advanced maternal age (≥48 years) in the UK between July 2013 and June 2014 (n = 233) and 454 comparison women. Methods Cohort and comparison group identification through the UKOSS monthly mailing. Main outcome measures Pregnancy complications. Results Older women were more likely than comparison women to be overweight (33% versus 23%, P = 0.0011) or obese (23% versus 19%, P = 0.0318), nulliparous (53% versus 44%, P = 0.0299), have pre‐existing medical conditions (44% versus 28%, P < 0.0001), a multiple pregnancy (18% versus 2%, P < 0.0001), and conceived following assisted conception (78% versus 4%, P < 0.0001). Older women appeared more likely than comparison women to have pregnancy complications including gestational hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes, postpartum haemorrhage, caesarean delivery, iatrogenic and spontaneous preterm delivery on univariable analysis and after adjustment for demographic and medical factors. However, adjustment for multiple pregnancy or use of assisted conception attenuated most effects, with significant associations remaining only with gestational diabetes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.81, 95% CI 1.93–12.00), caesarean delivery (aOR 2.78, 95% CI 1.44–5.37) and admission to an intensive care unit (aOR 33.53, 95% CI 2.73–412.24). Conclusions Women giving birth at advanced maternal age have higher risks of a range of pregnancy complications. Many of the increased risks appear to be explained by multiple pregnancy or use of assisted conception. Tweetable abstract The pregnancy complications in women giving birth aged 48 or over are mostly explained by multiple pregnancy. The pregnancy complications in women giving birth aged 48 or over are mostly explained by multiple pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K E Fitzpatrick
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - D Tuffnell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
| | - J J Kurinczuk
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M Knight
- National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|