Diagnostic utility of angiogenic biomarkers in pregnant women with suspected preeclampsia: A health economics review

sFlt1/PlGF among patients with suspected preeclampsia when considering hypertensive status

BACKGROUND

In high-resource settings, biomarkers of angiogenic balance, such as the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio, have been studied extensively to aid in evaluation of patients with suspected preeclampsia (PE), and have been incorporated into the 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy definition of PE. The utility in under-resourced settings has not been as well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis sought to identify the role of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio in the evaluation of patients with or without hypertension who are suspected of having PE without other diagnostic information.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a secondary analysis of a prior prospective study of patients who were presented with suspected PE at ≥20+0 weeks' gestation at a single academic tertiary care center. Patients were recruited in the parent study from July 2009 to June 2012. In the original study, clinicians were masked to biomarker results, and patients were followed by chart review. In this analysis, the performance of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio (≤38, >38, or >85) was assessed alone in identifying both hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients at risk of evolving into PE with severe features (PE-SF; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' definition) within two weeks of the triage visit (PE-SF2). Hypertension was defined as a blood pressure (BP)≥140/90 mmHg.

RESULTS

There were 1043 patients included in the analysis; of whom, 579 (55.5%) and 464 (44.5%) presented with or without hypertension, respectively. In triage, 332 (75.4%) of hypertensive patients presented due to BP concerns, and the remainder were evaluated due to other features (new-onset headache, proteinuria, or edema). On triage evaluation, 66.8% of all patients had a normal sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤38, and 17.0% had an elevated ratio >85. Among hypertensive patients, a sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤38 was a good rule-out test for PE-SF2 (negative likelihood ratio [LR-] of 0.15), and a ratio >85 was a good rule-in test (positive likelihood ratio [LR+] of 5.75). Among normotensive patients, sFlt1/PlGF was useful as a rule-in test for ratio >38 (LR+ 5.13) and >85 (LR+ 12.80). Stratified by gestational age, sFlt1/PlGF continued to be a good rule in and good rule out test at <35 weeks among those with hypertension but did not have good test performance ≥35 weeks. sFlt1/PlGF had a good test performance as a rule in test for >85 regardless of gestational age. In triage, 4.3% (30/693) of patients with sFlt1/PlGF ratio <38 had concurrent laboratory evidence of PE, compared with 15.9% (28/176) patients with ratio >85.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the potential for the use of sFlt1/PlGF and BP measurement alone in resource-limited settings where other laboratory tests or clinical expertise are unavailable for risk stratification. Performance of the biomarker varied by the presence of hypertension and gestational age.

Prevention of Pregnancy Complications Using a Multimodal Lifestyle, Screening, and Medical Model

Prevention of pregnancy complications related to the "great obstetrical syndromes" (preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, spontaneous preterm labor, and stillbirth) is a global research and clinical management priority. These syndromes share many common pathophysiological mechanisms that may contribute to altered placental development and function. The resulting adverse pregnancy outcomes are associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality and increased post-partum risk of cardiometabolic disease. Maternal nutritional and environmental factors are known to play a significant role in altering bidirectional communication between fetal-derived trophoblast cells and maternal decidual cells and contribute to abnormal placentation. As a result, lifestyle-based interventions have increasingly been recommended before, during, and after pregnancy, in order to reduce maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality and decrease long-term risk. Antenatal screening strategies have been developed following extensive studies in diverse populations. Multivariate preeclampsia screening using a combination of maternal, biophysical, and serum biochemical markers is recommended at 11-14 weeks' gestation and can be performed at the same time as the first-trimester ultrasound and blood tests. Women identified as high-risk can be offered prophylactic low dose aspirin and monitored with angiogenic factor assessment from 22 weeks' gestation, in combination with clinical assessment, serum biochemistry, and ultrasound. Lifestyle factors can be reassessed during counseling related to antenatal screening interventions. The integration of lifestyle interventions, pregnancy screening, and medical management represents a conceptual advance in pregnancy care that has the potential to significantly reduce pregnancy complications and associated later life cardiometabolic adverse outcomes.

Angiogenic Biomarkers in Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia contributes disproportionately to maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality throughout the world. A critical driver of preeclampsia is angiogenic imbalance, which is often present weeks to months before overt disease. Two placenta-derived angiogenic biomarkers, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF), have proved useful as diagnostic and prognostic tests for preeclampsia. Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the sFlt-1/PlGF assay to aid in the prediction of preeclampsia with severe features among women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy at 24-34 weeks of gestation. In this narrative review, we summarize the body of work leading to this approval and describe how the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio may be implemented in clinical practice as an adjunctive measure to help optimize care and to reduce adverse outcomes in preeclampsia.

Clinical value and cost analysis of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in addition to the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio in women with suspected pre-eclampsia: PREPARE cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinical value of adding the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to the spot urine protein/creatinine ratio (PCr) in women with suspected pre-eclampsia.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study performed in a tertiary referral centre. Based on the combination of PCr (< 30) and sFlt-1/PlGF (≤38) results, four groups were described: a double negative result, group A-/-; a negative PCr and positive sFlt-1/PlGF, group B-/+; a positive PCr and negative sFlt-1/PlGF, group C+/-; and a double positive result, group D+/+. The primary outcome was the proportion of false negatives of the combined tests in comparison with PCr alone in the first week after baseline. Secondary, a cost analysis comparing the costs and savings of adding the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was performed for different follow-up scenarios.

RESULTS

A total of 199 women were included. Pre-eclampsia in the first week was observed in 2 women (2%) in group A-/-, 12 (26%) in group B-/+, 4 (27%) in group C+/-, and 12 (92%) in group D+/+. The proportion of false negatives of 8.2% [95% CI 4.9-13.3] with the PCr alone was significantly reduced to 1.6% [0.4-5.7] by adding a negative sFlt-1/PlGF ratio. Furthermore, the addition of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio to the spot urine PCr, with telemonitoring of women at risk, could result in a reduction of 41% admissions and 36% outpatient visits, leading to a cost reduction of €46,- per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in addition to the spot urine PCr, may lead to improved selection of women at low risk and a reduction of hospital care for women with suspected pre-eclampsia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register (NL8308).

Cost-effectiveness analysis of implementing screening on preterm pre-eclampsia at first trimester of pregnancy in Germany and Switzerland

Objective

To assess the cost-effectiveness of preterm preeclampsia (PE) screening versus routine screening based on maternal characteristics in Germany and Switzerland.

Methods

A health economic model was used to analyse the cost-effectiveness of PE screening versus routine screening based on maternal characteristics. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare perspective with a time horizon of one year from the start of pregnancy. The main outcome measures were incremental health care costs and incremental costs per PE case averted.

Results

The incremental health care costs for PE screening versus routine screening per woman were €14 in Germany, and -CHF42 in Switzerland, the latter representing cost savings. In Germany, the incremental costs per PE case averted were €3,795. In Switzerland, PE screening was dominant. The most influential parameter in the one-way sensitivity analysis was the cost of PE screening (Germany) and the probability of preterm PE in routine screening (Switzerland). In Germany, at a willingness-to-pay for one PE case avoided of €4,200, PE screening had a probability of more than 50% of being cost-effective compared to routine screening. In Switzerland, at a willingness-to-pay of CHF0, PE screening had a 78% probability of being the most cost-effective screening strategy.

Conclusion

For Switzerland, PE screening is expected to be cost saving in comparison to routine screening. For Germany, the additional health care costs per woman were expected to be €14. Future cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted with a longer time horizon.

Hemodynamic pathways of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia

Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia are the 2 main types of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Noninvasive maternal cardiovascular function assessment, which helps obtain information from all the components of circulation, has shown that venous hemodynamic dysfunction is a feature of preeclampsia but not of gestational hypertension. Venous congestion is a known cause of organ dysfunction, but its potential role in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia is currently poorly investigated. Body water volume expansion occurs in both gestational hypertension and preeclampsia, and this is associated with the common feature of new-onset hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation. Blood pressure, by definition, is the product of intravascular volume load and vascular resistance (Ohm's law). Fundamentally, hypertension may present as a spectrum of cardiovascular states varying between 2 extremes: one with a predominance of raised cardiac output and the other with a predominance of increased total peripheral resistance. In clinical practice, however, this bipolar nature of hypertension is rarely considered, despite the important implications for screening, prevention, management, and monitoring of disease. This review summarizes the evidence of type-specific hemodynamic profiles in the latent and clinical stages of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Gestational volume expansion superimposed on an early gestational closed circulatory circuit in a pressure- or volume-overloaded condition predisposes a patient to the gradual deterioration of overall circulatory function, finally presenting as gestational hypertension or preeclampsia-the latter when venous dysfunction is involved. The eventual phenotype of hypertensive disorder is already predictable from early gestation onward, on the condition of including information from all the major components of circulation into the maternal cardiovascular assessment: the heart, central and peripheral arteries, conductive and capacitance veins, and body water content. The relevance of this approach, outlined in this review, openly invites for more in-depth research into the fundamental hemodynamics of gestational hypertensive disorders, not only from the perspective of the physiologist or the scientist, but also in assistance of clinicians toward understanding and managing effectively these severe complications of pregnancy.

Cost effectiveness of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test as an adjunct to the current practice of evaluating suspected preeclampsia in the United States

OBJECTIVE

Preeclampsia is a major obstetric disorder that can lead to severe maternal, fetal and infant outcomes. In women with suspected preeclampsia, measurement of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio has been shown to have a high negative predictive value (>97%). Our aim was to estimate the value to the US healthcare system of adopting this test into clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

An economic model was developed for the evaluation of suspected preeclampsia from a US payer perspective using data from a US observational study of 459 women evaluated between 23 and 34.6 weeks. Test results were not available to clinicians. The model compares two strategies for managing suspected preeclampsia: standard care versus a biomarker-informed pathway utilizing the sFlt1/PlGF ratio.

RESULTS

Utilization of the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test reduced the number of women admitted for suspected preeclampsia by 34-49%. Despite fewer admissions, a higher proportion of women admitted to hospital subsequently developed preeclampsia, and the proportion of women not admitted who would subsequently develop preeclampsia remained low (3.2%-6.7%). Cost savings arising from a reduction in admissions are estimated to be $1050 in the base case; varying the hospitalization cost ±25% would lead to savings in the range $771 to $1330 per patient at 2020 prices.

CONCLUSION

Adopting the sFlt1/PlGF ratio test as an adjunct to clinical criteria improves the assessment of risk in women presenting with suspicion of preeclampsia and has the potential to safely reduce unnecessary admissions and save costs.

Clinical implications of placenta-derived angiogenic/anti-angiogenic biomarkers in pre-eclampsia

Pre-eclampsia (PE) is a devastating systemic disease which results in maternal hypertension with multi-organ failure due to angiogenic imbalance, characterized by lack of circulating pro-angiogenic factors and excess of anti-angiogenic factors. These factors are crucial for understanding the pathophysiology of PE since they serve as a critical link from placental dysfunction to the clinical syndrome of systemic endothelial dysfunction in the disease. Moreover, utilizing these angiogenic/anti-angiogenic biomarkers can be helpful in risk stratifying and the early detection of PE, which allows for timely intervention to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. In this review, we summarize updated perspectives of the angiogenic imbalance in PE with detailed characterization of key factors involved in the pathogenesis and how the developed biomarkers can be used in clinical settings as diagnostic tools and as possible therapeutic targets of PE.

Unravelling the potential of angiogenic factors for the early prediction of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a multisystem, multiorgan hypertensive disorder of pregnancy responsible for maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries. The classic diagnostic features hold less specificity for preeclampsia and its associated adverse outcomes, suggesting a need for specific and reliable biomarkers for the early prediction of preeclampsia. The imbalance of pro- and antiangiogenic circulatory factors contributes to the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Several studies have examined the profile of angiogenic factors in preeclampsia to search for a biomarker that will improve the diagnostic ability of preeclampsia and associated adverse outcomes. This may help in more efficient patient management and the reduction of associated health care costs. This article reviews the findings from previous studies published to date on angiogenic factors and suggests a need to apply a multivariable model from the beginning of pregnancy and continuing throughout gestation for the early and specific prediction of preeclampsia.

Economic evaluation of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio for the short-term prediction of preeclampsia in a Japanese cohort of the PROGNOSIS Asia study

The PRediction of short-term Outcomes in preGNant wOmen with Suspected preeclampsIa Study (PROGNOSIS) Asia validated the use of the soluble fms-like tyrosine 1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PlGF) ratio cutoff value of ≤38 to rule out the occurrence of preeclampsia in the short term in Asian women. We assessed the economic impact of the introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test for predicting preeclampsia in Japan using data from the Japanese cohort of PROGNOSIS Asia. The cost analysis was developed with estimates in either a no-test scenario, with clinical decisions based on standard diagnostic procedures alone, or a test scenario, in which the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test was used in addition to standard diagnostic procedures. For both scenarios, rates of hospitalization and other test characteristics were obtained from the results for the Japanese cohort in PROGNOSIS Asia. The total cost per patient was the main outcome of this cost analysis model. Introduction of the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test using a cutoff value of 38 resulted in a reduced hospitalization rate compared with the rate in the no-test scenario (14.4% versus 8.7%). The reduction in the rate of hospitalizations led to an estimated 16 373 JPY reduction in healthcare costs per patient. The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio test is likely to reduce the unnecessary hospitalization of women at low risk of developing preeclampsia in the short term while also identifying high-risk individuals requiring appropriate management. Reducing unnecessary hospitalizations would result in significant cost savings in the Japanese healthcare system.

Evaluation of angiogenic factors in the decision to admit women with suspected preeclampsia

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes, specifically development of preeclampsia with severe features (sPE), between angiogenic biomarker-based admission and admission based on routine clinical care.

STUDY DESIGN

This secondary analysis of a prospective study evaluated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt1)/placental growth factor (PlGF) ratio in women presenting to triage for preeclampsia evaluation. Biomarkers levels were measured in samples collected from triage and analyzed retrospectively after outcomes were achieved. For this analysis patients would be hypothetically assigned to 'discharged' with a sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤ 38 and 'admitted' with a sFlt1/PlGF ratio > 85. Development of sPE and other outcomes were then compared using the biomarker and clinical criteria for admission.

RESULTS

459 patients were included in this analysis. Using biomarker criteria, a larger proportion of patients were hypothetically discharged (67.8% vs 51.0%, p < 0.0001). A larger proportion of patients 'admitted' with a high biomarker level developed sPE (69.5% vs 40.9%, p < 0.0001). A sFlt1/PlGF ratio ≤ 38 had a negative predictive value of 96.8% for development of sPE within two weeks.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of angiogenic biomarkes that 'discharges' patients with a low sFlt1/PlGF ratio and 'admits' patients with high ratio could result in reduced admissions and increased admission of patients at risk for developing sPE. Randomized trials are needed to determine the effectiveness of angiogenic biomarker use in decision making in a triage setting among women with suspected preeclampsia.