Photosensitization of in vitro biofilms formed on denture base resin

Effects of sterilization and disinfection methods on digitally designed surgical implant guide accuracy: An in vitro study

INTRODUCTION

Surgical guides are commonly used to assist with dental implant placement. This study investigated the effects of five sterilization and disinfection methods on the accuracy of implant guides.

METHODS

Thirty surgical guides (five in each group) were designed and printed (with digital light processing technology) using different sterilization or disinfection methods categorized into six groups: hydrogen peroxide sterilization (group one); glutaraldehyde sterilization (group two); autoclaving (group three); plasma sterilization (group four); iodophor disinfection (group five); and blank group (group six). Verification was determined using three methods: distance and angle between the cross-shaped marks, deformation after superimposing the guides, and displacement and axial changes in the virtual implant.

RESULTS

After disinfection and sterilization, the guides in the autoclaving and iodophor groups showed a more pronounced color change and the guide in the autoclaving group had visible cracks. More significant changes were observed in the H2O2, glutaraldehyde, autoclaving, and iodophor groups regarding deformation after superimposing the guides and the distance and angle between the cross-shaped marks. The average labial deformation values (mm) of the first through fifth groups of guides were 0.283, 0.172, 0.289, 0.153, and 0.188, respectively. All groups were statistically different from the blank group for displacement and axial changes of the virtual implant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The sizes of almost all surgical guides changed after sterilization and disinfection treatments, with between-group differences. Plasma sterilization was more suitable for surgical guide sterilization because of the smaller deformations after treatment.

Effect of silver vanadate on the antibiofilm, adhesion and biocompatibility properties of denture adhesive

Aim: To evaluate the biological and mechanical properties of an adhesive with nanostructured silver vanadate (AgVO3). Materials & methods: Specimens in poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were treated with Ultra Corega Cream (UCCA) denture adhesive with or without AgVO3. Biofilms of Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Streptococcus mutans were grown and the viable cells counted. Fluorescence microscopy was used. The viability of the VERO cell and adhesive strength were evaluated. Results: All concentrations of AgVO3 reduced the biofilm formation and showed no cytotoxic effect. At 5 min and 24 h, UCCA with 5 and 10% AgVO3 showed better performance, respectively. Conclusion: AgVO3 promoted the antibiofilm activity of the adhesive, with a positive effect on the adhesive strength, and was biocompatible.

The role of the light source in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy

Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) is a promising approach to fight the growing problem of antimicrobial resistance that threatens health care, food security and agriculture. APDT uses light to excite a light-activated chemical (photosensitiser), leading to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Many APDT studies confirm its efficacy in vitro and in vivo against bacteria, fungi, viruses and parasites. However, the development of the field is focused on exploring potential targets and developing new photosensitisers. The role of light, a crucial element for ROS production, has been neglected. What are the main parameters essential for effective photosensitiser activation? Does an optimal light radiant exposure exist? And finally, which light source is best? Many reports have described the promising antibacterial effects of APDT in vitro, however, its application in vivo, especially in clinical settings remains very limited. The restricted availability may partially be due to a lack of standard conditions or protocols, arising from the diversity of selected photosensitising agents (PS), variable testing conditions including light sources used for PS activation and methods of measuring anti-bacterial activity and their effectiveness in treating bacterial infections. We thus sought to systematically review and examine the evidence from existing studies on APDT associated with the light source used. We show how the reduction of pathogens depends on the light source applied, radiant exposure and irradiance of light used, and type of pathogen, and so critically appraise the current state of development of APDT and areas to be addressed in future studies. We anticipate that further standardisation of the experimental conditions will help the field advance, and suggest key optical and biological parameters that should be reported in all APDT studies. More in vivo and clinical studies are needed and are expected to be facilitated by advances in light sources, leading to APDT becoming a sustainable, alternative therapeutic option for bacterial and other microbial infections in the future.

Efficacy of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in disinfection of Candida biofilms on acrylic dentures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze and summarize the currently available scientific evidence concerning antifungal efficacy of aPDT against Candida on acrylic surface.

METHODS

The focused question was: '"Is aPDT effective in minimizing the counts of Candida on acrylic dentures". A literature search was conducted interpedently on the following electronic research databases: PubMED/MEDLINE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Embase. The MeSH terms used were: ((antimicrobial photodynamic therapy) OR (light) OR (laser) OR (photodynamic)) AND ((Candida) OR (denture stomatitis)) AND ((denture) OR (acrylic) OR (polymethylmethacrylate) OR (dental prosthesis)). Data was extracted from the studies and quality assessment was carried out using a modified version of the CONSORT checklist.

RESULTS

Eighteen in-vitro anti-microbial studies and 5 clinical studies were included. Twenty-two studies suggested that aPDT was effective in reducing the Candida count on acrylic dentures and one study did not have a significant effect. 19 out of 23 studies were graded as having 'medium' quality and 4 studies were graded as 'high'. Several photosensitizers, including methylene blue, porphyrin derivatives, toluidine blue-O and others were used. LED was the most popular light source used for photo-activation of the photosensitizers.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this review, aPDT is effective in reducing Candida growth on acrylic dentures and may prove to be clinical effective in preventing or treating denture stomatitis. However, more long-term clinical research is required before its clinical efficacy can be determined.

Photodynamic Therapy for Biomodulation and Disinfection in Implant Dentistry: Is It Feasible and Effective?

Dental implants are the most common rehabilitation and restorative treatment used to replace missing teeth. Biofilms adhere to implant surfaces to trigger implant-associated infection and inflammatory response. Clinically, the biofilm induces a local host response with the infiltration of phagocytic immune cells. The pro-inflammatory surroundings set off osteoclastogenesis, which leads to the septic loosening of the implant. The standard of dental care for implant-associated infection relies on a combination of surgery and antimicrobial therapy. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy is a noninvasive and photochemistry-based approach capable of reducing bacterial load and modulating inflammatory responses. In this review, we explore the photobiomodulation and disinfection outcomes promoted by photodynamic therapy for implant infections, highlighting the quality of evidence on the most up-to-date studies, and discuss the major challenges on the advance of these therapeutic strategies.

Combined Addition of Ethanol and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Enhances Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects in Methylene Blue-Mediated Photodynamic Treatment against Pseudomonas aeruginosa In Vitro

Antimicrobial photodynamic treatment (aPDT) for infection with drug-resistant bacteria has received much attention. For P. aeruginosa, however, efficient formation of biofilms and the nature of Gram-negative bacteria often limit the efficacy of aPDT. In this study, we investigated the effects of ethanol and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as additives on bacterial viability, biofilm biomass, and structures of bacteria and biofilms in methylene blue (MB)-mediated aPDT in vitro. Matured P. aeruginosa biofilms were incubated with 32-µm MB solutions with different concentrations of additives and then illuminated with 665-nm light from an LED array. The combined addition of 10% ethanol and 10 mm EDTA to MB resulted in significantly greater bactericidal effects than those of MB alone and of MB with 10% ethanol or 10 mm EDTA. Crystal violet assays showed significant reductions in biofilm biomass by aPDT with addition of both ethanol and EDTA compared to that in the case of aPDT with MB alone. Scanning electron microscopy showed broken bacterial cells and reduction in the cell density and amount of biofilm under those conditions. Ethanol addition alone did not improve aPDT efficacy. Reduced amount of biofilm by EDTA addition would have improved the transportation of MB and ethanol to bacteria.

Regimen and different surfaces interfere with photodynamic therapy on Candida albicans biofilms

The aim of this study is to compare antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) against Candida albicans biofilms formed on two different substrates - acrylic resin or bottom of polystyrene plate; and two aPDT application regimens - twice-daily over the course of 48 h or single treatment after 48 h biofilm formation. C. albicans SN425 biofilms cultivated on Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium were incubated for 5 min with toluidine blue O (44 μM) used as a photosensitizer before red light (635 nm; 175.2 J/cm2) exposure for 2 min. As negative control, ultrapure water, and as positive control 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) were used. Biofilms were analyzed for colony forming units (CFU) and cells morphology by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Single treatment and twice-daily aPDT on polystyrene plate and single treatment on acrylic resin did not significantly reduce the CFU (p > 0.05); in contrast, twice-daily aPDT on acrylic resin has reduced C. albicans below the detection limit, similarly to CHX treatment. Single aPDT treatment on polystyrene plate and on the resin presented a bulky and homogeneous biofilm predominantly formed by pseudohyphae. In contrast, in the resin group, the biofilm treated twice-daily with aPDT was predominantly formed by yeast cells, whilst pseudohyphae were occasionally visible. In conclusion, biofilms formed on polystyrene plates are more resistant to aPDT than biofilms formed on acrylic resin. Moreover, applying aPDT twice-daily reduces C. albicans biofilm development on acrylic resin and is a better approach against C. albicans biofilms than one single application on the mature biofilm.

Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms' Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions

Oral diseases are considered the most common noncommunicable diseases and are related to serious local and systemic disorders. Oral pathogens can grow and spread in the oral mucosae and frequently in biomaterials (e.g., dentures or prostheses) under polymicrobial biofilms, leading to several disorders such as dental caries and periodontal disease. Biofilms harbor a complex array of interacting microbes, increasingly unapproachable to antimicrobials and with dynamic processes key to disease pathogenicity, which partially explain the gradual loss of response towards conventional therapeutic regimens. New drugs (synthesized and natural) and other therapies that have revealed promising results for the treatment or control of these mixed biofilms are presented and discussed here. A structured search of bibliographic databases was applied to include recent research. There are several promising new approaches in the treatment of Candida spp.-Streptococcus mutans oral mixed biofilms that could be clinically applied in the near future. These findings confirm the importance of developing effective therapies for oral Candida-bacterial infections.

Bacterial biofilm formation on implantable devices and approaches to its treatment and prevention

In living organisms, biofilms are defined as complex communities of bacteria residing within an exopolysaccharide matrix that adheres to a surface. In the clinic, they are typically the cause of chronic, nosocomial, and medical device-related infections. Due to the antibiotic-resistant nature of biofilms, the use of antibiotics alone is ineffective for treating biofilm-related infections. In this review, we present a brief overview of concepts of bacterial biofilm formation, and current state-of-the-art therapeutic approaches for preventing and treating biofilms. Also, we have reviewed the prevalence of such infections on medical devices and discussed the future challenges that need to be overcome in order to successfully treat biofilms using the novel technologies being developed.

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy to Control Clinically Relevant Biofilm Infections

Biofilm describes a microbially-derived sessile community in which microbial cells are firmly attached to the substratum and embedded in extracellular polymeric matrix. Microbial biofilms account for up to 80% of all bacterial and fungal infections in humans. Biofilm-associated pathogens are particularly resistant to antibiotic treatment, and thus novel antibiofilm approaches needed to be developed. Antimicrobial Photodynamic therapy (aPDT) had been recently proposed to combat clinically relevant biofilms such as dental biofilms, ventilator associated pneumonia, chronic wound infections, oral candidiasis, and chronic rhinosinusitis. aPDT uses non-toxic dyes called photosensitizers (PS), which can be excited by harmless visible light to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). aPDT is a multi-stage process including topical PS administration, light irradiation, and interaction of the excited state with ambient oxygen. Numerous in vitro and in vivo aPDT studies have demonstrated biofilm-eradication or substantial reduction. ROS are produced upon photo-activation and attack adjacent targets, including proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids present within the biofilm matrix, on the cell surface and inside the microbial cells. Damage to non-specific targets leads to the destruction of both planktonic cells and biofilms. The review aims to summarize the progress of aPDT in destroying biofilms and the mechanisms mediated by ROS. Finally, a brief section provides suggestions for future research.

Long-term microwaving of denture base materials: effects on dimensional, color and translucency stability

While the combined effect of microwave irradiation with cleansing solutions on denture base materials has been investigated, the effects of only using microwave irradiation and, more importantly, in a long-term basis, was not studied yet.

Photodynamic inactivation of Candida albicans biofilm: Influence of the radiant energy and photosensitizer charge

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to investigate the photoinactivation of C. albicans biofilm on acrylic resin discs (the standard material for dental prosthesis) using the photosensitizers Methylene Blue and a Protoporphyrin IX.

METHODS

Eighteen thermally activated Methyl Methacrylate Polymers were used for the biofilm growth of Candida albicans ATCC 10231. Two photosensitizers were tested: methylene blue (50μM) and protoporphyrin IX (10μM). Two custom-made LEDs emitting at 660nm and 630nm with approximately 800mW each were used for the irradiation, with duration ranging from 2 to 10min.

RESULTS

This study demonstrates that MB decreased the aPDT CFUs by approximately two orders of magnitude, but the protoporphyrin was ineffective.

CONCLUSION

The aPDT with MB significantly reduces (but does not sterilize) the amount of CFU after 10min of irradiation, and it is not dose-dependent. The lack of effect of the protoporphyrin is likely because the negative charges of the proteoglycans present in the extracellular matrix repel the negative charges of the PS, thus preventing its diffusion in the cells.