Influence of anatomical subsite on the incidence of microsatellite instability, and KRAS and BRAF mutation rates in patients with colon carcinoma

Primary tumor resection improves prognosis of unresectable carcinomas of the transverse colon including flexures with pulmonary metastasis: a cohort study

PURPOSE

Studies of unresectable colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasis (CRPM) have rarely analyzed patient prognosis from the perspective of colonic subsites. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of primary tumor resection (PTR) on the prognosis of patients with unresectable pulmonary metastases of transverse colon cancer pulmonary metastasis (UTCPM), hepatic flexure cancer pulmonary metastasis (UHFPM), and splenic flexure cancer pulmonary metastasis (USFPM).

METHODS

Patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2018. The Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). The Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of PTR on survival.

RESULTS

This study included 1294 patients: 419 with UHFPM, 636 with UTCPM, and 239 with USFPM. Survival analysis for OS and CSS in the PTR groups, showed that there were no statistical differences in the the UHFPM, UTCPM, and USFPM patients. There were statistical differences in the UHFPM, UTCPM, and USFPM patients for OS and CSS. Three non-PTR subgroups showed significant statistical differences for OS and CSS.

CONCLUSION

We confirmed the different survival rates of patients with UTCPM, UHFPM, and USFPM and proved for the first time that PTR could provide survival benefits for patients with unresectable CRPM from the perspective of the colonic subsites of the transverse colon, hepatic flexure, and splenic flexure.

Right colon cancer: The influence of specific location on recurrence and survival

AIM

This study aimed to investigate whether the site of the tumour within the right colon affects survival in patients who underwent right colectomy for colon cancer.

METHODS

An observational retrospective longitudinal study was performed in patients who underwent right colectomy for non-metastatic, invasive right-sided colon cancer. Patients were categorized into two groups based on tumour location: (i) caecum and ascending colon; (ii) hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon. Demographic and clinical features were characterized, and a survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of the 198 patients enroled in the study, 134 (67.8%) had caecal or ascending colon cancer and 64 (32.3%) had hepatic flexure or transverse colon cancer. Seventy (35.4%) were female and the mean age at the time of surgery was 71.6 (SD 11.4). The groups were comparable with respect to the number of lymph nodes sampled, the pTNM stage, the histological differentiation grade and the likelihood of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Recurrence rate was nearly twice as high in the hepatic flexure and proximal transverse colon group (12.5% vs 6.7%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.174). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no differences in disease-free (p = 0.255) and overall survival (p = 0.258) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In our population, specific location of right-sided colon cancers does not appear to have an influence on survival. Further investigation is needed to determine if tumour subsite has an impact on the recurrence rate, and whether it should be considered in defining prognosis and treatment.

Impact of primary tumor resection on the survival of patients with unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis at different colonic subsites: a propensity score matching analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) on the prognosis of patients with unresectable colon cancer liver metastasis (UCCLM) at seven colonic subsites using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance selection bias using all available variables that could be of potential relevance. After matching, the groups were redefined in a 1:1 ratio using the nearest method. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) was compared among the patients of PTR and non-PTR groups. Cox regression models were used to identify the prognostic factors for CSS.

RESULTS

CSS was significantly different between all groups. Cox regression analysis showed that PTR was an independent prognostic factor for all groups. After PSM, PTR significantly prolonged CSS for all groups. Subgroup analysis showed that PTR did not improve the prognosis of N2 stage patients in the cecum, ascending colon, and descending colon groups; T1 + T2 stage patients in the hepatic flexure group; and patients with a tumor size ≤5 cm in the splenic flexure group. Segmental colectomy could prolong CSS of patients in the cecum, ascending colon, transverse colon, splenic flexure, and sigmoid colon groups, while extended colectomy could prolong CSS of patients in the hepatic flexure and descending colon groups.

CONCLUSION

At different colonic subsites, UCCLM patients had different CSS. PTR could improve their prognosis, however, N stage, T stage, and tumor size are important reference indicators. In addition to patients in the hepatic flexure and descending colon groups, we suggested that patients in other groups should choose segmental colectomy.

TIMP1 promotes cell proliferation and invasion capability of right-sided colon cancers via the FAK/Akt signaling pathway

Although right-sided colorectal cancer (CRC) shows a worse prognosis than left-sided CRC, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. We established patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from left- and right-sided CRCs and directly compared cell proliferation and invasion capability between them. We then analyzed the expression of numerous genes in signal transduction pathways to clarify the mechanism of the differential prognosis. Cell proliferation activity and invasion capability in right-sided cancer PDOs were significantly higher than in left-sided cancer PDOs and normal PDOs, as revealed by Cell Titer Glo and transwell assays, respectively. We then used quantitative RT-PCR to compare 184 genes in 30 pathways among right-sided and left-sided cancer and normal PDOs and found that the TIMP1 mRNA level was highest in right-sided PDOs. TIMP1 protein levels were upregulated in right-sided PDOs compared with normal PDOs but was downregulated in left-sided PDOs. TIMP1 knockdown with shRNA significantly decreased cell proliferation activity and invasion capability in right-sided PDOs but not in left-sided PDOs. Moreover, TIMP1 knockdown significantly decreased pFAK and pAkt expression levels in right-sided PDOs but not in left-sided PDOs. A database analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas revealed that TIMP1 expression in right-sided CRCs was significantly higher than in left-sided CRCs. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed significantly shorter overall survival in high-TIMP1 patients versus low-TIMP1 patients with right-sided CRCs but not left-sided CRCs. Our data suggest that TIMP1 is overexpressed in right-sided CRCs and promotes cell proliferation and invasion capability through the TIMP1/FAK/Akt pathway, leading to a poor prognosis. The TIMP1/FAK/Akt pathway can be a target for therapeutic agents in right-sided CRCs.

Survival Contradiction in Stage II, IIIA, And IIIB Colon Cancer: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Based Analysis

There exists an inconsistency between stage and survival in the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for colon cancer. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colon cancer patients with stage II, IIIA, and IIIB disease based on the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) curves. The Cox regression was employed to identify risk factors. The competing risk model was completed by the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test. In the final population of 31,361 colon cancer patients, Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that stage IIIA had the highest OS and CSS, followed by stage IIA and IIIB, and IIB and IIC showed the worst OS and CSS. In the Cox model, the stage was proven to be an independent prognostic factor. In the competing risk model, stage IIIA colon cancer patients had the lowest 5-year cancer-specific death rate in stages II, IIIA, and IIIB. In conclusion, the prognosis of colon cancer patients in stage IIA was worse than that of patients in stage IIIA, while the survival rate of stage IIB and IIC was lower than that of stage IIIB.

Primary Tumor Sidedness, RAS and BRAF Mutations and MSI Status as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Treated with Surgery and Thermal Ablation: Results from the Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE)

The aim of this study was to assess primary tumor sidedness of colorectal cancer (CRC), rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) mutations and microsatellite instability (MSI) status as prognostic factors predicting complications, survival outcomes, and local tumor progression (LTP) following surgery and thermal ablation in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). This Amsterdam Colorectal Liver Met Registry (AmCORE) based study included 520 patients, 774 procedures, and 2101 tumors undergoing local treatment (resection and/or thermal ablation) from 2000 to 2021. Outcomes following local treatment were analyzed for primary tumor sidedness of CRC, RAS, and BRAF mutations and MSI status. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate local tumor progression-free survival (LTPFS), local control (LC), distant progression-free survival (DPFS), and overall survival (OS). Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed based on Cox proportional hazards model. The chi-square test was used to analyze complications. Complications (p = 0.485), OS (p = 0.252), LTPFS (p = 0.939), and LC (p = 0.423) was not associated with tumor-sidedness. Compared to right-sided colon cancer (CC) (reference HR 1.000), DPFS was superior for left-sided CC and rectal cancer (p = 0.018) with an HR for left-sided CC of 0.742 (95% CI, 0.596–0.923) and for RC of 0.760 (95% CI, 0.597–0.966). Regarding RAS mutations, no significant difference was found in OS (p = 0.116). DPFS (p = 0.001), LTPFS (p = 0.039), and LC (p = 0.025) were significantly lower in the RAS mutation group. Though no difference in LTPFS was found between RAS wildtype and RAS mutated CRLM following resection (p = 0.532), LTPFS was worse for RAS mutated tumors compared to RAS wildtype following thermal ablation (p = 0.037). OS was significantly lower in the BRAF mutation group (p < 0.001) and in the MSI group (p < 0.001) following local treatment, while both did not affect DPFS, LTPFS, and LC. This AmCORE based study suggests the necessity of wider margins to reduce LTP rates in patients with RAS mutated CRLM, especially for thermal ablation. Upfront knowledge regarding molecular biomarkers may contribute to improved oncological outcomes.

Primary tumor resection improves prognosis of unresectable carcinomas of the transverse colon including flexures with liver metastasis: a preliminary population-based analysis

Purpose

Studies on unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis(CRLM) rarely analyze the prognosis of the patients from the point of colonic subsites. We aimed to evaluate the effect of primary tumor resection (PTR) and different scope of colectomy on the prognosis of patients with unresectable transverse colon cancer liver metastasis (UTCLM), hepatic flexure cancer liver metastasis (UHFLM), and splenic flexure cancer liver metastasis (USFLM).

Patients and methods

The patients were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify prognostic factors of overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were conducted to assess the effectiveness of PTR on survival.

Results

In total, this study included a cohort of 1960 patients: 556 cases of UHFLM, 1008 cases of UTCLM, and 396 cases of USFLM. The median survival time of whole patients was 11.0 months, ranging from 7.0 months for UHFLM patients to 15.0 months for USFLM patients. USFLM patients had the best OS and CSS, followed by UTCLM patients. UHFLM patients had the worst OS and CSS (All P < 0.001). PTR could improve the OS and CSS of UTCLM, UHFLM, and USFLM (All P < 0.001). Subgroups analysis revealed that USFLM patients with tumor size≤5 cm and negative CEA had not demonstrated an improved OS and CSS after PTR. Multivariate analysis showed that PTR and perioperative chemotherapy were common independent prognostic factors for UHFLM, UTCLM, and USFLM patients. There was no difference between segmental colon resection and larger colon resection on CSS of UHFLM, UTCLM, and USFLM patients.

Conclusions

We confirmed the different survival of patients with UTCLM, UHFLM, and USFLM, and for the first time, we proved that PTR could provide survival benefits for patients with unresectable CRLM from the perspective of colonic subsites of transverse colon, hepatic flexure, and splenic flexure. Besides, PTR may not improve the prognosis of USFLM patients with CEA- negative or tumor size≤5 cm. For oncologic outcomes, we concluded that segmental colon resection seemed an effective surgical procedure for UTCLM, UHFLM, and USFLM.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancers with Mismatch Repair Deficiency Result in Worse Survival Regardless of Peritoneal Metastases

BACKGROUND

Mismatch-repair deficiency (dMMR) predicts worse chemoresponsiveness but better survival in early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma. This study examined metastatic colorectal and appendix cancers with and without peritoneal metastasis (PM) in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), hypothesizing that dMMR tumors show better survival.

METHODS

Stage 4 colon, rectum, and appendix cancers (2010-2016) were identified in the NCDB (including goblet cell carcinoids, excluding neuroendocrine tumors). Stage 4 disease without liver, bone, brain, lung, or distant nodal metastases defined PM. Fisher's exact tests were used to compare proportions, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate survival.

RESULTS

Of 130,125 stage 4 colon, rectum, and appendix cancers, 27,848 (21.4%) had PM. Appendix primary tumors had PM more commonly than colon or rectum cancer (83.6% vs. 20.6% and 12.1% of stage 4 cases; p < 0.0001). More PM patients had MMR testing than patients with other metastasis (OM) (21.4% vs. 16.1%), and testing increased from 9.6% in 2010 to 26.3% in 2016 (both p < 0.0001). Among the PM patients, MMR testing was least common for appendix cancers (9.0%). When tested, PM patients more often had dMMR (22.9% [1122/4900] vs. 15.4% [2532/16,495] of OM patients; p < 0.0001). Colon primary tumor had dMMR most frequently (25.0% vs. 14.6% and 14.5% for rectal and appendix tumor; p < 0.0001). Most PM patients received chemotherapy (66.2%). Immunotherapy use increased over time (1.1% of PM diagnoses in 2010 vs. 20.8% in 2016). For MMR-tested stage 4 patients, dMMR correlated with worse survival (median OM, 19.7 vs. 23.9 months, p < 0.0001; median PM, 19.9 vs. 24.6 months, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

The NCDB showed dMMR predicting worse survival for stage 4 colorectal cancers with and without PM and dMMR existing in 14.5-25% of tested patients, suggesting that increased attention to MMR testing in stage 4 colorectal and appendix cancers can identify many patients who could potentially benefit from immunotherapy.

Re-Evaluation of the Survival Paradox Between Stage IIB/IIC and Stage IIIA Colon Cancer

Objective

We conducted this large population-based study to re-evaluate the survival paradox between stage IIB/C and stage IIIA colon cancer based on the newest staging criteria.

Methods

Colon cancer patients were recruited from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database using SEER*Stat software (version 8.3.4) with strict inclusion criteria. We used Chi-square test to compare categorical variables between patients diagnosed with stage IIB/IIC and stage IIIA colon cancer. Survival probabilities were then assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of clinicopathologic characteristics in stage IIB/IIC and stage IIIA colon cancer patients.

Results

In the current study, a total of 9,227 eligible colon cancer patients were collected from the SEER database between 2010 and 2015. It was found that stage IIIA had 66.4% decreased risk of colon cancer-specific mortality compared with stage IIB (HR = 0.336, 95%CI = 0.286–0.394 for stage IIIA, P < 0.001, using stage IIB as the reference) after the adjustment for other known prognostic factors. And T1N2a colon cancer had significantly lower 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared with T2N1 disease (74.7% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.018).

Conclusions

Our study confirmed the existence of survival paradox between stage IIB/IIC and stage IIIA colon cancer based on the newest staging criteria. What is more, the subgroup analyses revealed that T1N2a had the least influence on the survival paradox. N2a colon cancer seemed to be associated with worse prognosis than T2 disease, which would give us a better understanding of tumor biology of colon cancer and be conducive to the refinement of individualized treatment regimens in stage III disease.

Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Survival After Curative Resection in Patients with Colon Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score-Matching Studies

BACKGROUND

Recent retrospective subgroup analyses of patients with unresectable colon cancer (CC) receiving systemic chemotherapy have demonstrated that there is a significant difference in treatment outcome between patients with right-sided CC (RSCC) and those with left-sided CC (LSCC). However, it is impossible to divide patients with CC randomly into RSCC and LSCC groups before surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the impact of primary tumor location (PTL) on survival after curative surgery for patients with CC using propensity score-matching (PSM) studies instead of randomization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive electronic search of the literature up to January 2019 to identify studies that had used databases allowing comparison of postoperative survival between patients with RSCC and those with LSCC. To integrate the impact of PTL on 5-year overall survival (OS) after curative surgery, a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the selected PSM studies.

RESULTS

Five studies involving a total of 398,687 patients with CC were included in this meta-analysis. Among 205,641 patients with RSCC, 69,091 (33.6%) died during the observation period, whereas among 193,046 patients with LSCC, 63,380 (32.8%) died during the same period. These results revealed that patients with RSCC and those with LSCC had almost the same 5-year OS (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89-1.07; p = .64; I² = 97%).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis has demonstrated that there was no significant difference in 5-year OS between patients with RSCC and those with LSCC after curative resection.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

To integrate the impact of primary tumor location (PTL) on 5-year overall survival (OS) after curative surgery, five propensity score-matching (PSM) studies involving a total of 398,687 patients with colon cancer (CC) were included in this meta-analysis. Among 205,641 patients with right-sided CC (RSCC), 69,091 (33.6%) died during the observation period, whereas among 193,046 patients with left-sided CC (LSCC), 63,380 (32.8%) died during the same period. These results revealed that patients with RSCC and those with LSCC had almost the same 5-year OS (risk ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.07; p = .64; I² = 97%).

Identification of Risk Factors Associated With Stage III Disease in Nonmetastatic Colon Cancer: Results From a Prospective National Cohort Study

Purpose

This study aimed to identify possible patient- and tumor-related factors associated with risk of TNM stage III disease in nonmetastatic colon cancer.

Methods

The associations between stage III disease and age, sex, lymph node yield, pathological tumor (pT) stage, tumor subsite, type of surgery, and priority of surgery were assessed in a nationwide cohort of 13,766 patients treated with curative resection of colon cancer. Each level of age, lymph node yield, and pT stage was compared to the preceding level.

Results

Age, lymph node yield, pT stage, tumor subsite, and priority of surgery were associated with stage III disease. Odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) were as follows: age < 65/65–75 years: 1.28 (95% CI, 1.15–1.43) and 65–75/ > 75 years: 1.22 (95% CI, 1.13–1.32); lymph node yield 0–5/6–11: 0.60 (95% CI, 0.50–0.72), lymph node yield 6–11/12–17: 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76–0.93), and lymph node yield 12–17/ ≥ 18: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.89–1.05); pT1/pT2: 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57–0.95), pT2/pT3: 0.35 (95% CI, 0.30–0.40), and pT3/pT4: 0.49 (95% CI, 0.47–0.54). Only tumors of the transverse colon were independently associated with lower risk of stage III disease than tumors in the sigmoid colon (sigmoid colon: 1, transverse colon: 0.84 [95% CI, 0.73–0.96]; elective surgery: 1, acute surgery: 1.43 [95% CI, 1.29–1.60]).

Conclusion

In this study, stage III disease in colon cancer was significantly associated with age, lymph node yield, pT stage, tumor subsite, and priority of surgery but was not associated with right-sided location compared with stage I and II cancers.

Prevalence of BRAF gene mutation in samples of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the prevalence and biology of BRAF gene can improve the treatment methods of cancerous patients. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of BRAF gene mutation in samples of primary and metastatic colorectal cancer using meta-analysis method.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Ovid and Google Scholar motor engine using MeSH terms of relevant keywords. During the screening phase, titles, abstracts and full texts were reviewed and risk of bias was assessed for all selected papers based on Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) checklist. The results of the primary studies were combined using meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 95 eligible studies entered into the meta-analysis, prevalence of BRAF gene mutation had been assessed among 19,484 primary tumour samples as well as 12,256 metastatic samples. The total prevalence of BRAF gene mutation among primary tumour samples was estimated as of 10.16% (8.09-12.22) in the world, 0.41% (0-1.89) in EMRO region, 10.06% (7.54-12.59) in EURO region, 10.33% (7.24-13.43) in SEARO region and 11.33% (7.29-15.37) in WPRO region. The pooled estimates for BRAF gene mutation in metastatic samples were 6.53% (5.09-7.96), 8.07% (5.57-10.56), 5.38% (3.75-7.02) and 5.55% (1.72-9.38) for all regions, EURO, WPRO and PAHO regions respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed evidences of BRAF gene mutation in one-tenth of primary colorectal tumour samples in EURO, PAHO, SEARO and WPRO regions which was considerably higher than that of the EMRO region.

The primary tumor location impacts survival outcome of colorectal liver metastases after hepatic resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Location of the primary tumor side has become an increasingly prognostic factor for colorectal liver metastasis. The present study was to perform a meta-analysis to investigate if primary right-sided tumor impacted on long-term survival outcome of colorectal liver metastases following local treatment.

METHOD

Eligible trials were identified from the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane database that were published before October in 2018. English language trials that compared long-term survival outcome of primary left-sided tumor with right-sided tumor colorectal liver metastases following local treatment were included. Hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases was investigated. The main study outcomes included overall survival and disease free survival of primary right-sided colorectal liver metastases following local treatment. The risk factors of largest tumor size, primary node metastases, multiple tumor and RAS mutation were also analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis was done using a fixed-effects model. Hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval was used to measure the pooled effect.

RESULTS

A total of twelve studies with 6387 patients were included. For primary right-sided colorectal liver metastases patients following hepatic resection, the overall pooled HR for 5-year overall survival rate was 1.354 (95% CI: 1.238-1.482; p = 0.000; I² = 33.7%, p = 0.138). The pooled HR for 5-year disease free survival rate of primary right-sided CRLM in the included studies calculated using the fix-effects model was 1.104 (95% CI: 0.987-1.235; p = 0.084; I² = 0%, p = 0.477).

CONCLUSION

It demonstrated that primary right-sided for colorectal liver metastases location was a significantly worse prognostic factor in terms of overall survival.

Primary Tumor Sidedness is Predictive of Survival in Colon Cancer Patients Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: A US HIPEC Collaborative Study

INTRODUCTION

The clinical relevance of primary tumor sidedness is not fully understood in colon cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of a multi-institutional database of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy at 12 participating high-volume academic centers from the US HIPEC Collaborative.

RESULTS

Overall, 336 patients with colon primary tumors who underwent curative-intent CRS with or without HIPEC were identified; 179 (53.3%) patients had right-sided primary tumors and 157 (46.7%) had left-sided primary tumors. Patients with right-sided tumors were more likely to be older, male, have higher Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI), and have a perforated primary tumor, but were less likely to have extraperitoneal disease. Patients with complete cytoreduction (CC-0/1) had a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 11.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-15.3) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 9.5-16.8) [p = 0.158] and median overall survival (OS) of 30 months (95% CI 23.5-36.6) versus 45.4 months (95% CI 35.9-54.8) [p = 0.028] for right- and left-sided tumors; respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that right-sided primary tumor was an independent predictor of worse DFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.19-2.56; p =0.004) and OS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09-2.73; p = 0.020).

CONCLUSION

Right-sided primary tumor was an independent predictor of worse DFS and OS. Relevant clinicopathologic criteria, such as tumor sidedness and PCI, should be considered in patient selection for CRS with or without HIPEC, and guide stratification for clinical trials.

Lymph node yield and tumour subsite are associated with survival in stage I-III colon cancer: results from a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that apart from tumour and nodal status, a range of patient-related and histopathological factors including lymph node yield and tumour location seems to have prognostic implications in stage I-III colon cancer. We analysed the prognostic implication of lymph node yield and tumour subsite in stage I-III colon cancer.

METHODS

Data on patients with stage I to III adenocarcinoma of the colon and treated by curative resection in the period from 2003 to 2011 were extracted from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database, merged with information from the Danish National Patient Register and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 13,766 patients were included in the analysis. The 5-year overall survival ranged from 59.3% (95% CI 55.7-62.9%) (lymph node yield 0-5) to 74.0% (95% CI 71.8-76.2%) (lymph node yield ≥ 18) for patients with stage I-II disease (p < 0.0001) and from 36.4% (95% CI 29.8-43.0%) (lymph node yield 0-5) to 59.4% (95% CI 56.6-62.2%) (lymph node yield ≥ 18) for patients with stage III disease (p < 0.0001). The 5-year overall survival for tumour side left/right was 59.3% (95% CI 57.9-60.7%)/64.8% (CI 63.4-66.2%) (p < 0.0001). In the seven colonic tumour subsites, the 5-year overall survival ranged from 56.6% (95% CI 51.8-61.4%) at splenic flexure to 65.8% (95% CI 64.5-67.2%) in the sigmoid colon (p < 0.0001). In a cox regression analysis, lymph node yield and tumour side right/left were found to be prognostic factors. Tumours at the hepatic and splenic flexures had an adverse prognostic outcome.

CONCLUSION

For stage I-III colon cancer, a lymph node yield beyond the recommended 12 lymph nodes was associated with improved survival. Both subsite in the right colon, as well as subsite in the left colon, turned out with adverse prognostic outcome questioning a simple classification into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer.

Does Primary Tumor Side Matter in Patients with Metastatic Colon Cancer Treated with Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND

Primary tumor location has been shown to be prognostic of overall survival (OS) in patients with both locally advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer. The impact of sidedness on prognosis has not been evaluated in the setting of peritoneal-only metastases treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC).

METHODS

A retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases of patients with peritoneal surface malignancy undergoing CRS/HIPEC from three high-volume centers was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 115 patients with metastatic colon cancer to the peritoneum who underwent CRS/HIPEC with mitomycin C were identified. Fifty-one patients (45%) had left-sided primary tumors, and 64 (55%) had right-sided primary tumors. Patients with right-sided tumors were more likely to be older (median age 56 vs. 49 years, p = 0.007) and to have signet ring cell histology (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.026). Patients with right-sided tumors had median disease-free survival (DFS) and OS of 14 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.5-17.5) and 36 months (95% CI 27.4-44.6), respectively, versus 16 months (95% CI 11.0-21.0) and 69 months (95% CI 24.3-113.7) for those patients with left-sided tumors. On multivariate analysis, primary tumor side was an independent predictor of both DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, there was a dramatic, clinically significant difference in OS between patients with right- and left-sided tumors, and primary tumor side was an independent predictor of DFS and OS. Primary tumor side should be considered in patient selection for CRS with or without HIPEC.

Colorectal Cancer Biomarkers in the Era of Personalized Medicine

The 5-year survival probability for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has not drastically changed over the last several years, nor has the backbone chemotherapy in first-line disease. Nevertheless, newer targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been approved primarily in the refractory setting, which appears to benefit a small proportion of patients. Until recently, rat sarcoma (RAS) mutations remained the only genomic biomarker to assist with therapy selection in metastatic colorectal cancer. Next generation sequencing has unveiled many more potentially powerful predictive genomic markers of therapy response. Importantly, there are also clinical and physiologic predictive or prognostic biomarkers, such as tumor sidedness. Variations in germline pharmacogenomic biomarkers have demonstrated usefulness in determining response or risk of toxicity, which can be critical in defining dose intensity. This review outlines such biomarkers and summarizes their clinical implications on the treatment of colorectal cancer. It is critical that clinicians understand which biomarkers are clinically validated for use in practice and how to act on such test results.

Right or Left Primary Site of Colorectal Cancer: Outcomes From the Molecular Analysis of the AGITG MAX Trial

BACKGROUND

For metastatic colorectal cancer, previous reports have described differences in biology and outcome, including response to biologic agents, based on whether the primary tumor is right- or left-sided. We explored the molecular markers from the AGITG MAX trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The AGITG MAX trial was a randomized study comparing capecitabine versus capecitabine + bevacizumab versus capecitabine + bevacizumab + mitomycin C as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer. Patients were classified as having right-sided (caecum to transverse colon) or left-sided (descending colon to rectum) disease according to anatomic location. Baseline characteristics and previously described molecular profiles were compared by side of primary tumor. Survival outcomes were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier approach and proportional hazards regression modeling.

RESULTS

Among the 471 patients, the location of primary tumor was known in 440 patients (93%). Molecular profile was known in 298 patients (63%). Twenty-eight percent had right-sided primary tumors. Major differences between right and left are as follows: female 49% versus 33% (P < .01), BRAF mutant 16% versus 3.5% (P ≤ .001), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss 27.6% versus 53% (P = .01). There were no differences in RAS mutation, PIK3CA mutation, or high versus low expression of assessed angiogenic markers. Right-sided primary lesion predicted a poor outcome for median overall survival: right-sided disease 13.2 months versus left-sided disease 20 months (P = .001; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-0.85), but not for progression-free survival (HR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78-1.20). The relative treatment effect did not differ significantly according to location of primary tumor: right primary tumor HR (bevacizumab containing arm vs. capecitabine monotherapy arm) was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.54-1.22), and left primary HR (bevacizumab containing arm vs. capecitabine monotherapy arm) was 0.51 (95% CI, 0.4-0.63) (interaction P = .10).

CONCLUSION

There are more negative prognostic factors in patients with right-sided primary tumors, in particular high BRAF mutations, and these patients have inferior overall survival compared to those with a left-sided primary tumor. There was no suggestion that side of primary site had any impact on bevacizumab effect on progression-free survival.

DNA mismatch repair and CD133-marked cancer stem cells in colorectal carcinoma

Background

Except for a few studies with contradictory observations, information is lacking on the possibility of association between DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status and the presence of cancer stem cells in colorectal carcinoma (CRC), two important aspects in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Methods

Eighty (40 right-sided and 40 left-sided) formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded primary CRC were immunohistochemically studied for CD133, a putative CRC stem cell marker, and MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. CD133 expression was semi-quantitated for proportion of tumor immunopositivity on a scale of 0-5 and staining intensity on a scale of 0-3 with a final score (units) being the product of proportion and intensity of tumor staining. The tumor was considered immunopositive only when the tumor demonstrated moderate to strong intensity of CD133 staining (a decision made after analysis of CD133 expression in normal colon). Deficient MMR (dMMR) was interpreted as unequivocal loss of tumor nuclear staining for any MMR protein despite immunoreactivity in the internal positive controls.

Results

CD133 was expressed in 36 (90.0%) left-sided and 28 (70.0%) right-sided tumors (p < 0.05) and CD133 score was significantly higher in left- (mean ± SD = 9.6 ± 5.3 units) compared with right-sided tumors (mean ± SD = 6.8 ± 5.6 units) p < 0.05). dMMR was noted in 14 (35%) right-sided and no (0%) left-sided CRC. When stratified according to MMR status, dMMR cases showed a lower frequency of CD133 expression (42.9%) and CD133 score (mean ± SD = 2.5 ± 3.6 units) compared with pMMR tumors on the right (frequency = 84.6%; mean score ± SD = 9.2 ± 5.0 units) as well as pMMR tumors on the left (frequency = 90.0%; mean score ± SD = 9.6 ± 5.3 units) (p < 0.05). Interestingly, frequencies of CD133 immunoreactivity and CD133 scores did not differ between pMMR CRC on the right versus the left (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Proficient MMR correlated with high levels of CD133-marked putative cancer stem cells in both right- and left-sided tumors, whereas significantly lower levels of CD133-marked putative cancer stem cells were associated with deficient MMR status in colorectal carcinomas found on the right.

Prognostic effect of sidedness in early stage versus advanced colon cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The prognostic effect of sidedness in colorectal cancer has been evaluated in numerous prospective and retrospective cohorts. Most of these have reported overall survival data; there is scant relapse-free survival data in early stage disease. This study aimed to determine the effect of tumor sidedness in survival in early stage and relapsed colon cancer.

METHODS

Patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer were identified from the BC Cancer Agency Gastrointestinal Cancer Outcomes Unit. Survival analysis by stage and sidedness was compared with the log-rank test. Baseline characteristics were controlled by multivariate Cox-proportional hazard models. In relapsed patients, bevacizumab and EGFR inhibitor (EGFRI) treatments were included and tested for interaction.

RESULTS

Among 5378 patients with stage I-III colon cancer, patients with right-sided stage II tumors experienced better relapse-free survival compared with those with left-sided tumors; right-sidedness was not prognostic for RFS in stage III disease. When survival was considered in patients who relapsed, right-sided tumors had inferior survival after relapse in both stage II and stage III tumors. At relapse, right-sided outcomes were inferior regardless of biologic therapy. An interaction test revealed a significant association between sidedness and survival with EGFRIs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large, population-based study, right-sided presentation has a significant prognostic impact: in early stage, right-sidedness is favorably prognostic among stage II tumors and not prognostic in stage III disease. After relapse, right- sidedness is associated with an inferior prognosis, regardless of initial stage of presentation. Colon tumor sidedness is independently prognostic and may be considered in treatment assignment for both early stage and advanced disease.

Histopathological Predictors of Recurrence in Stage III Colon Cancer: Reappraisal of Tumor Deposits and Tumor Budding Using AJCC8 Criteria

Patients with stage III colonic adenocarcinoma have a spectrum of risk for recurrent disease, and histopathological variables that predict recurrence can help stratify patients into prognostic groups. To identify histopathological predictors of recurrence, we investigated the effect of implementation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8) staging system definition of tumor deposits and International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) criteria for tumor budding compared with other known prognostic variables in 256 resected colonic adenocarcinomas, including 150 stage III and 106 stage II tumors. In stage III colon cancer, tumor deposits and high tumor budding were the only independent histological variables that predicted disease recurrence. In a multivariable analysis in stage III colon cancer, tumor deposits and high tumor budding were associated with a 2.2- and 1.5-fold increased risk of developing disease recurrence, respectively (95% CI = 1.1-4,2, P = .02, and 95% CI = 1.1-2.1, P = .01, respectively). The negative prognostic effect of tumor deposits was most pronounced in patients with stage IIIB disease in which tumor deposits were associated with a 3.2-fold increased risk of disease recurrence (95% CI = 1.4-7.1; P = .005). Within the N1 cohort, patients with tumor deposits without concurrent positive lymph nodes (N1c) had a significantly decreased disease-free survival compared with patients with N0 tumors ( P < .001) and patients with N1a/b tumors ( P = .02). As independent risk factors for recurrence, tumor deposits and high tumor budding are important histopathological variables and should be included as a part of a routine comprehensive pathological risk assessment in stage III colon cancer.

The Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of primary tumor location on overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and long-term outcomes has not been well established in patients undergoing potentially curative resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

METHODS

A single-institution database was queried for initial resections for CRLM 1992-2004. Primary tumor location determined by chart review (right = cecum to transverse; left = splenic flexure to sigmoid). Rectal cancer (distal 16 cm), multiple primaries, and unknown location were excluded. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used. Cure was defined as actual 10-year survival with either no recurrence or resected recurrence with at least 3 years of disease-free follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 907 patients were included with a median follow-up of 11 years; 578 patients (64%) had left-sided and 329 (36%) right-sided primaries. Median OS for patients with a left-sided primary was 5.2 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6-6.0) versus 3.6 years (95% CI 3.2-4.2) for right-sided (p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis, the hazard ratio for right-sided tumors was 1.22 (95% CI 1.02-1.45, p = 0.028) after adjusting for common clinicopathologic factors. Median RFS was marginally different stratified by primary location (1.3 vs. 1.7 years; p = 0.065). On multivariable analysis, location of primary was not significantly associated with RFS (p = 0.105). Observed cure rates were 22% for left-sided and 20% for right-sided tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing resection of CRLM, left-sided primary tumors were associated with improved median OS. However, long-term survival and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different stratified by primary location. Patients with left-sided primary tumors displayed a prolonged clinical course suggestive of more indolent biology.

Primary tumor location as a predictor of the benefit of palliative resection for colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis

Background

It is still under debate that whether stage IV colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastasis can benefit from primary tumor resection, especially for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients. Retrospective studies have shown controversial results concerning the benefit from surgery. This retrospective study aims to evaluate whether the site of primary tumor is a predictor of palliative resection in asymptomatic stage IV colorectal cancer patients.

Methods

One hundred ninety-four patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer were selected from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Database in the period between January 2007 and December 2013. All information was carefully reviewed and collected, including the treatment, age, sex, carcinoembryonic antigen, site of tumor, histology, cancer antigen 199, number of liver metastases, and largest diameter of liver metastasis. The univariate and multivariate analyses were used to detect the relationship between primary tumor resection and overall survival of unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer patients.

Results

One hundred twenty-five received palliative resection, and 69 received only chemotherapy. Multivariate analysis indicated that primary tumor site was one of the independent factors (RR 0.569, P = 0.007) that influenced overall survival. For left-side colon cancer patients, primary tumor resection prolonged the median overall survival time for 8 months (palliative resection vs. no palliative resection: 22 vs. 14 months, P = 0.009); however, for right-side colon cancer patients, palliative resection showed no benefit (12 vs. 10 months, P = 0.910).

Conclusions

This study showed that left-side colon cancer patients might benefit from the primary tumor resection in terms of overall survival. This result should be further explored in a prospective study.

Prognostic Value of BRAF and KRAS Mutations in MSI and MSS Stage III Colon Cancer

Background

The prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutations within microsatellite-unstable (MSI) and microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroups of resected colon carcinoma patients remains controversial. We examined this question in prospectively collected biospecimens from stage III colon cancer with separate analysis of MSI and MSS tumors from patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX +/- cetuximab in two adjuvant therapy trials.

Methods

Three groups were defined: BRAF Mutant, KRAS Mutant, and double wild-type. The analytic strategy involved estimation of study-specific effects, assessment of homogeneity of results, and then analysis of pooled data as no differences in patient outcome were found between treatment arms in both trials. Associations of mutations with patient outcome were analyzed, and multivariable models were adjusted for treatment and relevant factors.

Results

Four thousand four hundred eleven tumors were evaluable for BRAF and KRAS mutations and mismatch repair status; 3934 were MSS and 477 were MSI. In MSS patients, all BRAF V600E mutations (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.23 to 1.92, P < .001), KRAS codon 12 alterations, and p.G13D mutations (HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.40 to 1.83, P < .001) were associated with shorter time to recurrence (TTR) and shorter survival after relapse (SAR; HR = 3.02 , 95% CI = 2.32 to 3.93, P < .001, and HR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.44, P = .04, respectively). Overall survival (OS) in MSS patients was poorer for BRAF-mutant patients (HR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.56 to 2.57, P < .001) and KRAS-mutant patients (HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.38 to 1.91, P < .001) vs wild-type. No prognostic role of KRAS or BRAF mutations was seen in MSI patients. Furthermore, no interaction was found between treatment arm (with or without cetuximab) and KRAS and BRAF mutations for TTR or OS in MSS patients.

Conclusions

In a pooled analysis of resected stage III colon cancer patients receiving adjuvant FOLFOX, BRAF or KRAS mutations are independently associated with shorter TTR, SAR, and OS in patients with MSS, but not MSI, tumors. Future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting should consider these mutations as important stratification factors.

Metabolite and Microbiome Interplay in Cancer Immunotherapy

The role of the host microbiome has come to the forefront as a potential modulator of cancer metabolism and could be a future target for precision medicine. A recent study revealed that in colon cancer, bacteria form polysaccharide matrices called biofilms at a high frequency in the proximal colon. Comprehensive untargeted and stable isotope-assisted metabolomic analysis revealed that the bacteria utilize polyamine metabolites produced from colon adenomas/carcinomas to build these protective biofilms and may contribute to inflammation and proliferation observed in colon cancer. This study highlighted the importance of finding the biological origin of a metabolite and assessing its metabolism and mechanism of action. This led to a better understanding of host and microbial interactions, thereby aiding therapeutic design for cancer. In this review, we will discuss methodologies for identifying the biological origin and roles of metabolites in cancer progression and discuss the interactions of the microbiome and metabolites in immunity and cancer treatment, focusing on the flourishing field of cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res; 76(21); 6146-52. ©2016 AACR.

KRAS, NRAS, BRAF mutations and high counts of poorly differentiated clusters of neoplastic cells in colorectal cancer: observational analysis of 175 cases

A novel grading system based on the counting of poorly differentiated clusters (PDC) of neoplastic cells at the invasive margin and in the tumour stroma was recently introduced among the histological parameters predictive of adverse clinical outcome in colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of this study was to correlate the histological grade based on PDC and the mutational status of KRAS, NRAS and BRAF genes in 175 consecutive CRCs. The highest PDC count under the objective lens of a ×20 microscopic field in each tumour was considered for grading assessment, so that PDC counts <5, 5-9 and ≥10 PDCs were defined grade 1, grade 2 and grade 3, respectively. Hotspots mutations were identified using the MassArray platform. Overall, there were 42 (24%) mutated tumours. Mutational status was significantly associated with high pT stage (p = 0.0021), advanced pTNM stage (p = 0.0018), nodal metastases (p = 0.006), tumour budding (p = 0.022) and high PDC grade (p = 0.0022). KRAS mutations were significantly associated with PDC grade (p = 0.0379), while BRAF mutations were associated with PDC-G3 although statistical significance was not reached. No significant associations were found between NRAS and PDC. The significant association between mutated KRAS and PDC grade suggests that KRAS mutations may be involved in the formation of PDC.

Impact of Primary Tumor Site on Bevacizumab Efficacy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

With an ever-increasing focus on personalized medicine, all factors known to affect treatment response need to be considered when defining optimal therapy for individual patients. While the prognostic impact of primary tumor site on colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes is established, emerging data suggest potential differences in response to biologic therapies. We studied the impact of tumor site on bevacizumab efficacy in patients with metastatic CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed data of patients in an Australian prospective multicenter metastatic CRC (mCRC) registry who received first-line chemotherapy. Tumor site was defined as right colon, cecum to transverse; left colon, splenic flexure to rectosigmoid; and rectum. Kaplan-Meier and Cox models were used for survival analyses.

RESULTS

Of 926 patients, 297 had right colon, 354 left colon, and 275 rectum primary disease. Median age was 68.6, 65.9, and 63.3 years, respectively (P = .001). Right colon disease was significantly associated with intraperitoneal spread (P < .0001), while left colon and rectum disease preferentially metastasized to the liver and lungs, respectively (P < .0001 in both settings). A total of 636 patients (68.7%) received bevacizumab. Progression-free survival was superior for bevacizumab-treated patients in all groups but appeared greatest in right colon disease (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.60; P ≤ .001). Overall survival was longest in patients with disease of the rectum, followed by left colon and right colon (median, 26.2, 23.6, and 18.2 months, respectively; P = .0004).

CONCLUSION

Tumor site appears to be prognostic in mCRC, with rectum and right colon disease associated with the best and worst outcomes, respectively. Patients who received bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy had superior outcomes, with the effect appearing greatest in patients with right colon disease.

Segmental distribution of some common molecular markers for colorectal cancer (CRC): influencing factors and potential implications

Proximal and distal colorectal cancers (CRCs) are regarded as distinct disease entities, evolving through different genetic pathways and showing multiple clinicopathological and molecular differences. Segmental distribution of some common markers (e.g., KRAS, EGFR, Ki-67, Bcl-2, COX-2) is clinically important, potentially affecting their prognostic or predictive value. However, this distribution is influenced by a variety of factors such as the anatomical overlap of tumorigenic molecular events, associations of some markers with other clinicopathological features (stage and/or grade), and wide methodological variability in markers' assessment. All these factors represent principal influences followed by intratumoral heterogeneity and geographic variation in the frequency of detection of particular markers, whereas the role of other potential influences (e.g., pre-adjuvant treatment, interaction between markers) remains rather unclear. Better understanding and elucidation of the various influences may provide a more accurate picture of the segmental distribution of molecular markers in CRC, potentially allowing the application of a novel patient stratification for treatment, based on particular molecular profiles in combination with tumor location.

A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites

PURPOSE

Stage III colon cancer is currently treated as an entity with a unified therapeutic principle. The aim of the retrospective study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of site-specific stage III colon cancers and the influences of tumor location on prognosis.

METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-five patients with stage III colon cancer treated with radical operation and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) were divided into seven groups according to colon segment (cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and sigmoid colon). Expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) was examined by immunohistochemistry. We assessed if differences exist in patient characteristics and clinic outcomes between the seven groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P < 0.001), metachronous liver metastasis (P < 0.001), metachronous lung metastasis (P < 0.001), and ERCCI expression (P < 0.001) between the seven groups. Both 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) exhibited significant differences (both P < 0.001) with survival gradually decreasing from cecum to sigmoid colon. Cox regression analyses identified that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage III colon cancer located proximally carried a poorer survival than that located distally. Different efficacies of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy may be an important factor affecting survival of site-specific stage III colon cancers.

Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab in NCIC CO.17

BACKGROUND

Right- and left-sided colon cancers (RC, LC) differ with respect to biology, pathology and epidemiology. Previous data suggest a mortality difference between RC and LC. We examined if primary tumour side also predicts for outcome in chemotherapy refractory, metastatic colon cancer (MCC). We also compared RC versus LC as a predictor of efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition with cetuximab.

METHODS

Reanalyzing NCIC CO.17 trial (cetuximab versus best supportive care [BSC]), we coded the primary tumour side as RC (caecum to transverse colon) or LC (splenic flexure to rectosigmoid). The association between tumour side and baseline characteristics was assessed. Cox regression models determined factors affecting overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Patients with RC (150/399) had more poorly differentiated, mutant KRAS, mutated PIK3CA and wild-type BRAF tumours, fewer liver and lung metastases, and shorter interval between diagnosis and study entry. Among BSC patients, tumour side was not prognostic for PFS (hazard ratios (HR) 1.07 [0.79-1.44], p = 0.67) or OS (HR 0.96 [0.70-1.31], p = 0.78). Among wild-type KRAS patients, those with LC had significantly improved PFS when treated with cetuximab compared to BSC (median 5.4 versus 1.8 months, HR 0.28 [0.18-0.45], p < 0.0001), whereas those with RC did not (median 1.9 versus 1.9 months, HR 0.73 [0.42-1.27], p = 0.26), [interaction p = 0.002].

CONCLUSION

In refractory MCC, tumour location within the colon is not prognostic, but is strongly predictive of PFS benefit from cetuximab therapy. Additional research is needed to understand the molecular differences between RC and LC and their interaction with EGFR inhibition.

Distinct gene expression profiles of proximal and distal colorectal cancer: implications for cytotoxic and targeted therapy

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease with genetic profiles and clinical outcomes dependent on the anatomic location of the primary tumor. How location impacts the molecular makeup of a tumor and how prognostic and predictive biomarkers differ between proximal versus distal colon cancers is not well established. We investigated the associations between tumor location, KRAS and BRAF mutation status, and the mRNA expression of proteins involved in major signaling pathways, including tumor growth (EGFR), angiogenesis (VEGFR2), DNA repair (ERCC1) and fluoropyrimidine metabolism (TS). FFPE tumor specimens from 431 advanced CRC patients were analyzed. The presence of 7 different KRAS base substitutions and the BRAF V600E mutation was determined. ERCC1, TS, EGFR and VEGFR2 mRNA expression levels were detected by RT-PCR. BRAF mutations were significantly more common in the proximal colon (p<0.001), whereas KRAS mutations occurred at similar frequencies throughout the colorectum. Rectal cancers had significantly higher ERCC1 and VEGFR2 mRNA levels compared to distal and proximal colon tumors (p=0.001), and increased TS levels compared to distal colon cancers (p=0.02). Mutant KRAS status was associated with lower ERCC1, TS, EGFR, and VEGFR2 gene expression in multivariate analysis. In a subgroup analysis, this association remained significant for all genes in the proximal colon and for VEGFR2 expression in rectal cancers. The mRNA expression patterns of predictive and prognostic biomarkers as well as associations with KRAS and BRAF mutation status depend on primary tumor location. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and determine the underlying mechanisms.

Does the primary site of colorectal cancer impact outcomes for patients with metastatic disease?

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have described differences in biology and outcome for colorectal cancer based on whether the primary is right or left sided. Further division by right, left, and rectum or even exact primary site has also been explored. Possible differences in response to biological agents have also been reported based on side of primary lesion.

METHODS

We explored the South Australian registry for metastatic colorectal cancer to assess if there were any differences in patient characteristics, prognostic markers, and treatment received and outcomes based on whether the primary was right or left sided. We also explored if differences exist based on left colon and rectum and by exact primary site.

RESULTS

Two thousand nine hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed. Thirty-five percent had a right-sided primary. The median overall survival for the entire group right versus left was 9.6 versus 20.3 months (P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed side of primary as an independent prognostic factor. For the group that had active therapy, defined as chemotherapy (± metastasis resection), median overall survival was right, 18.2 months; and left, 29.4 months (P < .001). Importantly, we found no suggestion of major differences if left side was divided by left colon and rectum, and trends by individual site still supported a left and right division.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a right-sided primary have more negative prognostic factors and indeed have inferior outcomes compared with those with a left-sided primary. Our data with further breakdown by exact site still favor a simple left-versus-right division moving forward for metastatic colorectal cancer.

The effects of palliative chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with an ECOG performance status of 3 and 4

BACKGROUND

Although chemotherapy is standard for patients with mCRC and ECOG PS of 0/1, the real benefit for patients with ECOG PS > 2 remains uncertain, because they are generally excluded from clinical trials. Our objectives were to compare the survival and safety of ECOG PS 3/4 patients who were administered chemotherapy with those who received BSC only.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all consecutive mCRC patients who started first-line chemotherapy at our institution in a 4-year period. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to adjust for prognostic factors and logistic regression, to identify predictive factors of Grade 3/4 toxicity.

RESULTS

From June 2008 to June 2012, 240 consecutive patients were included: 100 (41.7%) had an ECOG PS of 0/1, 75 (31.3%) ECOG PS of 2, and 65 (27%) ECOG PS of 3/4. Median survival for patients treated with chemotherapy was 18.4 months for patients with ECOG PS of 0/1, 10.8 months for those with ECOG PS of 2, and 6.8 months for patients with ECOG PS of 3/4. Among those with ECOG PS of 3/4, chemotherapy use led to a nonsignificant survival gain (median, 6.8 vs. 2.3 months for BSC; P = .13). Factors significantly associated with worse survival in an adjusted analysis were right-sided tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.97; P = .005) and ECOG PS status (ECOG PS 2 vs. 0/1; HR, 1.67; P = .025, and ECOG PS 3/4 vs. 0/1; HR, 2.67; P < .0001). The rate of Grade ≥ 3 toxicities during the first cycle did not differ significantly across ECOG groups; likely because 40% of ECOG PS 3/4 patients received upfront dose-reduced therapy. The rates of treatment-related hospitalization were similar across all ECOG groups. All deaths were disease-associated.

CONCLUSION

Our retrospective study suggests that chemotherapy might benefit selected mCRC patients with poor PS. With up-front dose reduction and close monitoring for toxicity, the risk of serious adverse events is minimized.

Prognostic value of KRAS mutations in stage III colon cancer: post hoc analysis of the PETACC8 phase III trial dataset

BACKGROUND

The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in colon adenocarcinoma is controversial. We examined this question as an ancillary study of the PETACC8 phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the prognostic impact of KRAS exon 2 mutations in stage III colon cancer patients (n = 1657) receiving adjuvant FOLFOX ± cetuximab therapy included in the PETACC8 trial. Patients with BRAF-mutated cancers were excluded and, as no difference was found for time to recurrence (TTR) and disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms, both were pooled for analysis. Associations with TTR and DFS were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

KRAS mutations were found in 638 of 1657 tumors and linked to shorter TTR (P < 0.001). However, when specific mutations were compared with wild-type, codon 12 mutations [hazard ratio (HR) 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35-2.04; P < 0.001] but not codon 13 (HR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85-1.79; P = 0.26) were significantly associated with shorter TTR, independently of other covariates. The interaction test showed that, regarding tumor location (distal versus proximal), KRAS genotype affects differently on recurrence (P = 0.02) and DFS (P = 0.042). Subgroup analysis showed that KRAS only affected TTR and DFS in distal tumors (n = 1043; 692 wild type; 351 mutated), with an increased risk of relapse (HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.51-2.56; P < 0.0001) for KRAS codon 12 mutations and a borderline significance for codon 13 mutations (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00-2.56; P = 0.051).

CONCLUSION

KRAS exon 2 mutations are independent predictors of shorter TTR in patients with resected stage III distal colon cancers receiving adjuvant therapy. Future clinical trials in the adjuvant setting should consider both the tumor location and KRAS mutations as important stratification factors.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

This is an ancillary study of the PETACC8 trial: EUDRACT 2005-003463-23.

Survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1-2N1) colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The survival paradox between stage IIB/C (T4N0) and stage IIIA (T1-2N1) colon cancer remains in the 7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. This multicenter study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes of T4N0 and T1-2N1 colon cancers and to investigate the presumptive prognostic factors that might influence the survival paradox.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative surgery for pT4N0 (n = 224) and pT1-2N1 (n = 135) primary colon cancer between January 1999 and December 2010 at five tertiary referral cancer centers were included for analysis. The clinicopathologic, treatment-related factors, and oncologic outcomes in terms of the 5-year overall survival (5-OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (5-DFS) were compared.

RESULTS

The T4N0 group had significantly worse 5-OS and 5-DFS rates than the T1-2N1 group (5-OS: 84.0 vs. 92.3 %, p = 0.012; 5-DFS: 73.6 vs. 88.0 %, p = 0.001). T4N0 cancers more frequently showed elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, lower grade of differentiation, larger tumor size, and higher proportions of perineural invasion, microsatellite instability, obstruction, and perforation than T1-2N1 cancers. Peritoneal seeding and liver metastasis were the predominant recurrence pattern in the T4N0 and T1-2N1 groups, respectively (p = 0.042). The T4N0 group showed inferior survival to the T1-2N1 group in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (5-OS: 87.1 vs. 93.2 %, p = 0.045; 5-DFS: 76.1 vs. 89.0 %, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

T4N0 colon cancer had significantly worse oncologic outcomes than T1-2N1 cancer regardless of adjuvant chemotherapy. The survival paradox may result from the biologic aggressiveness of T4N0 colon carcinomas.

Prognostic implication of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancers depends on tumour location

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is usually categorised as proximal or distal CRC. Recently, many researchers have tried to determine the molecular heterogeneity of CRCs along bowel subsites. However, the differential effects of the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) and microsatellite instability (MSI) on the clinical outcome according to tumour location are not well-known.

METHODS

We analysed clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics, including CIMP, MSI, KRAS and BRAF mutations, in 734 CRCs according to bowel subsites. And the prognostic value of CIMP and MSI was analysed according to tumour location.

RESULTS

We found a linear increase of female predominance, T, N category, stage, differentiation, absence of luminal necrosis, tumour -infiltrating lymphocytes, Crohn's-like lymphoid reaction, serration and mucin production from the rectum to caecum. CpG island methylator phenotype -high and MSI-high gradually increased from the rectum to caecum. CpG island methylator phenotype is a poor prognostic factor of overall survival (hazard ratio (HR): 4.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-13.46) and disease-free survival (HR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.04-8.08) in rectal cancers.

CONCLUSION

Clinicopathologic and molecular profiles of CRCs gradually change along bowel subsites, and the prognostic implication of CIMP is different according to tumour location.

A nationwide Danish cohort study challenging the categorisation into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer

OBJECTIVES

The categorisation of colon cancer (CC) into right-sided (RCC) and left-sided (LCC) disease may not capture more subtle variances in aetiology and prognosis. In a nationwide study, we investigated differences in clinical characteristics and survival of RCC versus LCC and of the complete range of CC subsites.

DESIGN

Prospective nationwide cohort study.

SETTING

The database of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG).

PARTICIPANTS

23 487 CC patients.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival (Kaplan-Meier plots) and mortality (HR from Cox proportional hazards regression analysis) according to CC localisation. For adjustment and stratification, we used age, sex, ASA score (the American Society of Anaesthesiologists score), tumour location and stage, number of lymph nodes harvested at operation, number of lymph nodes with metastases and presence of distant metastases.

RESULTS

Patients with RCC had a higher median age at diagnosis (74.3 years) than patients with LCC (71.8 years; p<0.0001). Overall, the proportion of patients who were women increased the closer the tumour site was to the small intestine. Although RCC patients had higher ASA scores than LCC patients (p<0.0001), the highest ASA scores were observed in patients with cancer in the transverse and descending colon and at both colon flexures. While RCCs overall were more advanced than LCCs (p<0.0001), the most advanced CCs were those of the descending colon, splenic flexure and caecum. RCC mortality was higher than LCC mortality only during the first 2 years (women: HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.20; men: HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.20 to 1.35), and relative to mortality from sigmoid CC, the highest mortality was observed from splenic flexure cancer (HR 1.75; 95% CI 1.54 to 2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The present data challenge the simple categorisation of CC into RCC and LCC.

The prognostic value of BRAF mutation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mutation of BRAF is a predominant event in cancers with poor prognosis such as melanoma and colorectal cancer. BRAF mutation leads to a constitutive activation of mitogen activated protein kinase pathway which is essential for cell proliferation and tumor progression. Despite tremendous efforts made to target BRAF for cancer treatment, the correlation between BRAF mutation and patient survival is still a matter of controversy.

METHODS/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Clinical studies on the correlation between BRAF mutation and patient survival were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between June 2002 and December 2011. One hundred twenty relevant full text studies were categorized based on study design and cancer type. Publication bias was evaluated for each category and pooled hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using random or fixed effect meta-analysis based on the percentage of heterogeneity. Twenty six studies on colorectal cancer (11,773 patients) and four studies on melanoma (674 patients) were included in our final meta-analysis. The average prevalence of BRAF mutation was 9.6% in colorectal cancer, and 47.8% in melanoma reports. We found that BRAF mutation increases the risk of mortality in colorectal cancer patients for more than two times; HR = 2.25 (95% CI, 1.82-2.83). In addition, we revealed that BRAF mutation also increases the risk of mortality in melanoma patients by 1.7 times (95% CI, 1.37-2.12).

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed that BRAF mutation is an absolute risk factor for patient survival in colorectal cancer and melanoma.