Solid-Pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A clinicopathological review of 20 cases including rare examples

Background features in the cytology of pancreatic neoplasms

Cytology is a useful method for diagnosing pancreatic neoplasms. Although endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle aspiration has recently become the mainstream method for the diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms, pancreatic juice and pancreatic duct brushing cytology continue to be useful diagnostic methods for the investigation of pancreatic neoplasms. Diagnoses using pancreatic cytology are primarily based on the features related to tumor cells; however, evaluation of the background features provides important information that could further aid the diagnosis. Pancreatic neoplasms show various histological types, each of which is associated with its own characteristic background features. The necrotic background, desmoplastic stroma, and presence of cancer‐associated fibroblasts are background features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a mucinous background is associated with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms and mucinous cystic neoplasms, and hyaline globules are observed in solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. However, some background features are associated with more than one histological type of pancreatic neoplasm, highlighting the importance to base a diagnosis on the results of a comprehensive analysis of not only the background features but also the tumor cells. Here, we provide a review of the key background cytological features of pancreatic neoplasms, which can serve as a guide to improve diagnosis and research.

Molecular Alterations in Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm of the Pancreas: The Achilles Heel in Conquering Pancreatic Tumorigenesis

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas are overwhelmingly benign tumors predominately observed in women in the third decade of life. However, their malignant potential, based on local recurrences and metastases, has brought into question the available evidence on their biological behavior. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms have distanced themselves from other pancreatic tumors with varying morphological appearance, immune profile, and histogenesis. In review of the literature, PubMed was queried using search strings, including "solid pseudopapillary neoplasm" and "molecular," and "immunohistochemistry." Alternative searches were also conducted given the variability in tumor name, including "solid pseudopapillary tumor" and "Frantz tumor." This article provides an in-depth review into the molecular pathways that contribute to the pathogenesis of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms. It also discusses the implications of existing molecular pathways toward tumor aggressiveness and recurrence potential.

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: Key Pathologic and Genetic Features

CONTEXT.—

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas is a low-grade malignant tumor generally associated with a good prognosis. Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms show peculiar morphologic features, but sometimes the differential diagnosis with other pancreatic neoplasms (ie, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors) can be a challenging task, especially in cytologic or biopsy specimens. In these cases immunohistochemistry is a useful tool, but the diagnostic utility of several proposed immunohistochemical markers is questionable. In recent years, despite several attempts to characterize the pathogenetic, molecular, and prognostic features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, they still remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE.—

To give the reader a comprehensive update on this entity.

DATA SOURCES.—

The PubMed database (US National Library of Medicine) was searched using the following string: pseudopapillary tumor [AND/OR] neoplasm [AND/OR] pancreas. All articles written in English were included. In addition, because a heterogeneous terminology has been used in the past to define solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, the reference lists of each paper selected in the PubMed database were also reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS.—

This review gives a comprehensive update on the pathologic, clinical, and molecular features of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms, particularly addressing issues and challenges related to diagnosis. In addition, we have tried to correlate the molecular alterations with the morphologic and clinical features.

Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 29 cases of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas in patients under 20 years of age along with detailed review of literature

Background

Pancreatic Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasms (SPNs) are rare low-grade malignant tumors with a marked preponderance for young females. Objective was to describe the morphology, differential diagnosis, and prognosis of SPNs in patients under 20 years of age and present a detailed review of literature.

Methods

A total of 29 cases in patients under 20 years of age reported as SPN during the period January 2014 to December 2019, were included in the study. These included 19 resection specimens, 4 incision biopsies and 6 cases received as blocks for second opinion. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides as well as immunohistochemistry (IHC) slides of all cases were retrieved and reviewed by the authors. TFE3 and Progesterone Receptor were performed retrospectively.

Results

Twenty-eight of the 29 patients were females. Ages of patients ranged from 12 to 19 years. Nineteen cases were resections. Tail was the commonest location. Mean tumor size was 9.5 cm. In 89.5% cases, tumor was confined to the pancreas. In 2 cases, distant metastasis was present. In 2 cases, extension beyond pancreas was seen. Solid and pseudopapillary areas were seen in all cases while other features were variable. Beta catenin and Cyclin D1 were positive in most cases while TFE3 was positive in 57% cases. Progesterone Receptor (PR) was positive in all 13 cases in which it was performed. Follow up was available in 14 patients. Follow up period ranged from 3 to 70 months. Twelve were alive and well without recurrence or metastasis while 2 were alive with recurrence and metastasis to liver and omentum respectively.

Conclusions

Although many studies on SPNs have been published, surgeons, oncologists and even pathologists in this part of the world are often not aware of these rare tumors leading to inaccuracies and delays in diagnosis. In addition, this paper focusses on the interesting observation that the majority of SPNs diagnosed in our department during study period occurred in patients under 20 years of age (29 versus 21 in patients over 20). However, clinico-epidemiological, morphologic and prognostic features were similar in both age groups. Possibility of SPNs should always be considered in case of pancreatic neoplasms occurring in patients under 20 years of age as well. We believe that this is a very interesting and helpful study for the clinicians as well as the pathologists.

Molecular markers contribute to the clinical diagnosis for pancreatic cystic neoplasms

A pancreatic cystic neoplasm (PCN) is a rare pancreatic disease. Malignant PCNs are usually identified incidentally while evaluating other lesions. However, PCNs are being identified more frequently owing to the increased use of abdominal imaging. Malignant PCNs have complicated and diverse biological behaviors, including various malignant risk factors, diverse molecular features, natural history, and complex pathological classifications. Although many diagnostic methods, such as cross-sectional imaging and endoscopic evaluation, have been developed, malignant PCNs are still difficult to differentiate from benign tumors. On searching for related articles in the recent decade, we found that some molecular biomarkers such as carcinoembryonic antigen could be useful for discriminating between malignant tumors and benign tumors. However, cytopathologic evaluation is the most useful method for differentiating between benign and malignant lesions. Although cytopathologic evaluation has a specificity of 100% for identifying malignancies, its accuracy is often hampered by the low cellularity of PCN cells in the cystic fluid. Herein, we review the progress in the use of cellular and molecular markers for the accurate identification of PCNs.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors of recurrence in patients with Solid Pseudopapillary Tumors of the Pancreas

BACKGROUND

The recurrence rates and predictors of recurrence in patients with Solid Pseudopapillary tumors (SPT) are unclear, which makes it challenging to determine the duration of follow-up. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the recurrence rates and pathologic factors associated with recurrence in patients with SPT.

METHODS

A PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science search was conducted to identify studies of SPT published during the last 15 years: (09/2002-09/2017). Studies reporting on patients with SPT and follow-up of >5 years were included. The search strategy was conducted per 2009 PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 103 studies reporting on 2599 non-metastatic SPT patients were identified. Sixty-nine patients (2.6%) developed recurrence during follow-up. Pooled estimates from studies with a sample size >20 (N = 33) noted an overall recurrence rate of 2% (95% CI 1-2%). Male gender (OR 1.960), positive lymph nodes (OR 11.9), R1 margins (OR 11.1), and LVI (OR 5.5), were associated with a significantly (all p < 0.05) increased risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Current meta-analysis suggests that only 2% of patients with SPT experience recurrence after resection. These data will guide the treating physicians and patients regarding recurrence rates and help identify patients at increased risk of recurrence during follow-up.

First reported case of a collision tumor composed of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a case report

BACKGROUND

Collision tumors are rare cases with two different tumor entities growing synchronously. While adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the most common pancreatic tumor with an incidence of 10 per 100.000, retroperitoneal liposarcoma remains very rare. This is the first report of a collision tumor between these two tumor entities.

CASE PRESENTATION

Demographic details: The tumor was diagnosed in a 64 male Caucasian patient. Besides atrial fibrillation, arterial hypertension and a hypothyroidism there is no relevant medical history especially no history of cancer. Clinical details: During a routine check-up an unclassified tumor of the pancreatic tail was diagnosed. The lab showed no pathologies. Tumor markers were negative for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and 72-4 (CA 19-9, CA 72-4) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and neuron specific enolase (NSE) were both elevated (AFP 97kU/l, (< 5,8kU/l) and NSE 30,0 μg/l (16,4 μg/l)). A computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy was performed which revealed a low-grade liposarcoma (G1). A CT scan showed no metastases. A surgical resection was recommended by the interdisciplinary tumor board.

INTERVENTIONS

A systematic left sided retroperitoneal compartment resection including en-bloc-left sided pancreatectomy, splenectomy, nephrectomy, hemicolectomy, adrenalectomy, partial gastrectomy and partial resection of the diaphragm was performed. Pathology revealed a collision tumor consisting of pancreatic adenocarcinoma that was classified pT3, pN2 (11/33 ece+) L1 V0 Pn0, R0; G2 [UICC Stage III] and a liposarcoma pT2, pN0 (0/33) L0 V0 Pn0, G1 [UICC Stage Ib]. The postoperative tumor board recommended an adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and capecitabine for the locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

OUTCOME

At the latest follow-up (1 year after surgery) the patient was in good clinical condition and without evidence of tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Collision tumors are rare and difficult to diagnose. This is the first description of a collision tumor composed of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and retroperitoneal liposarcoma. The reported case demonstrates that inconsistent diagnostic results (e.g. imaging and pathology) should raise suspicion concerning the diagnosis. Awareness of these rare cases might protect us from underdiagnosing patients and therefore leading to better patient care. There is evolving evidence that will lead to more personalized treatment options for somatic BRCA mutated pancreatic cancer.

Ovarian collision tumors: imaging findings, pathological characteristics, diagnosis, and differential diagnosis

Collision tumors are uncommon neoplasms in which elements of differing histologic origins coexist in a single mass. Ovarian collision tumors are a rare subtype of such lesions. The identification of collision tumors by radiologic examinations is essential to ensure that comprehensive biopsies are performed to guide appropriate treatments. According to the clinical and imaging findings of 12 patients and reviews of previous studies, ovarian collision tumors are mixtures of different combinations of epithelial tumors, germ cell tumors, and sex-cord-stromal tumors. The smaller tumors are usually located inside ("nested tumor") or on the wall ("back to back") of the larger tumors. Each type of ovarian collision tumors presents specific CT/MRI features in accordance with their histologic origins and collision patterns. Knowledge of the imaging features of ovarian collision tumors is crucial to aid preoperative diagnostic accuracy.