Upregulated expression of DDX5 predicts recurrence and poor prognosis in breast cancer

DDX5 enhances HIF-1 activity by promoting the interaction of HIF-1α with HIF-1β and recruiting the resulting heterodimer to its target gene loci

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Cancer cells acquire malignant characteristics and therapy resistance by employing the hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1)-dependent adaptive response to hypoxic microenvironment in solid tumors. Since the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unclear, difficulties are associated with establishing effective therapeutic strategies.

RESULTS

We herein identified DEAD-box helicase 5 (DDX5) as a novel activator of HIF-1 and found that it enhanced the heterodimer formation of HIF-1α and HIF-1β and facilitated the recruitment of the resulting HIF-1 to its recognition sequence, hypoxia-response element (HRE), leading to the expression of a subset of cancer-related genes under hypoxia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that the regulation of HIF-1 recruitment to HRE is an important regulatory step in the control of HIF-1 activity.

SIGNIFICANCE

The present study provides novel insights for the development of strategies to inhibit the HIF-1-dependent expression of cancer-related genes.

NAMPT promotes the malignant progression of HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma through activation of SREBP1-mediated lipogenesis

Metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer. The nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT)-mediated salvage pathway maintains sufficient cellular NAD levels and is required for tumorigenesis and development. However, the molecular mechanism by which NAMPT contributes to HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains not fully understood. In the present study, our results showed that NAMPT protein was obviously upregulated in HBV-positive HCC tissues compared with HBV-negative HCC tissues. NAMPT was positively associated with aggressive HCC phenotypes and poor prognosis in HBV-positive HCC patients. NAMPT overexpression strengthened the proliferative, migratory, and invasive capacities of HBV-associated HCC cells, while NAMPT-insufficient HCC cells exhibited decreased growth and mobility. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that NAMPT activated SREBP1 (sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1) by increasing the expression and nuclear translocation of SREBP1, leading to the transcription of SREBP1 downstream lipogenesis-related genes and the production of intracellular lipids and cholesterol. Altogether, our data uncovered an important molecular mechanism by which NAMPT promoted HBV-induced HCC progression through the activation of SREBP1-triggered lipid metabolism reprogramming and suggested NAMPT as a promising prognostic biomarker and therapeutic target for HBV-associated HCC patients.

DDX39B facilitates the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma via activation of SREBP1-mediated de novo lipid synthesis

PURPOSE

The detailed molecular mechanisms of aberrant lipid metabolism in HCC remain unclear. Herein, we focused on the potential role of DDX39B in aberrant lipogenesis and malignant development in HCC.

METHODS

DDX39B expression in HCC and para-cancer tissues was measured by immunohistochemistry. CCK-8, colony formation and Transwell assays were utilized to detect HCC cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro. Oil red O and Nile red staining and triglyceride and cholesterol detection were used to measure lipogenesis. Coimmunoprecipitation was used to detect interactions between DDX39B and SREBP1. Immunofluorescence assays were performed to investigate the impact of DDX39B on SREBP1 nuclear translocation. A luciferase assay was used to explore the transcriptional activity of SREBP1. The subcutaneous and orthotopic xenograft models in nude mice were generated to verify the contribution of the DDX39B/SREBP1 axis to tumor growth, lung metastasis and lipid synthesis in vivo.

RESULTS

DDX39B is upregulated in HCC tissues and predicts a worse prognosis. Upregulated DDX39B contributes to the proliferation, metastasis and lipogenesis of HCC cells. Mechanistically, DDX39B directly interacts with SREBP1, and silencing DDX39B impairs the stabilization of the SREBP1 protein through FBXW7-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of SREBP1. Furthermore, DDX39B deficiency decreases the nuclear translocation and activation of SREBP1 and transcription of SREBP1 downstream genes, resulting in reduced lipid accumulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals a novel mechanism by which DDX39B facilitates the malignant progression of HCC via activation of SREBP1-mediated de novo lipogenesis, implicating DDX39B as both a potential predictor of recurrence and prognosis and a promising therapeutic target.

Combined low levels of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Results of previous studies about the prognostic roles of histone H4 lysine 16 acetylation (H4K16ac) and histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation (H4K20me3) in breast cancer were inconsistent. Cellular experiments revealed the interplays between H4K16ac and H4K20me3, but no population study explored the interaction between them on the prognosis.

METHODS

H4K16ac and H4K20me3 levels in tumors were evaluated by immunohistochemistry for 958 breast cancer patients. Hazard ratios for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using Cox regression models. Interaction was assessed on multiplicative scale. Concordance index (C-index) was calculated to verify the predictive performance.

RESULTS

The prognostic roles of the low level of H4K16ac or H4K20me3 were significant only in patients with the low level of another marker and their interactions were significant. Moreover, compared with joint high levels of both them, only the combined low levels of both them was associated with a poor prognosis but not the low level of single one. The C-index of the clinicopathological model combined the joint expression of H4K16ac and H4K20me3 [0.739 for OS; 0.672 for PFS] was significantly larger than that of the single clinicopathological model [0.699 for OS, P < 0.001; 0.642 for PFS, P = 0.003] or the model combined with the single H4K16ac [0.712 for OS, P < 0.001; 0.646 for PFS, P < 0.001] or H4K20me3 [0.724 for OS, P = 0.031; 0.662 for PFS, P = 0.006].

CONCLUSIONS

There was an interaction between H4K16ac and H4K20me3 on the prognosis of breast cancer and the combination of them was a superior prognostic marker compared to the single one.

ZNF32 prevents the activation of cancer-associated fibroblasts through negative regulation of TGFB1 transcription in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women worldwide. Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are one of the fundamental cellular components of the tumor microenvironment and play a critical role in the initiation, progression, and therapy resistance of breast cancer. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms of CAFs activation from normal fibroblasts (NFs) are still not well understood. In the present study, we reported that ZNF32 expression in breast cancer cells was negatively correlated with CAF-related markers (FSP1, α-SMA, and FAP) in stromal fibroblasts, and loss of ZNF32 promoted the activation of CAFs, as evidenced by the enhanced proliferation and contractility of CAFs. ZNF32 deficiency-mediated fibroblast activation promoted the growth and metastasis of breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that ZNF32 inhibited TGFB1 transcription by directly binding to the -1968/-1962 region of the TGFB1 promoter, leading to the prevention of fibroblast activation. Altogether, our findings reveal an important mechanism by which ZNF32 suppression increases the transcription of the TGFB1 gene in breast cancer cells, and subsequently, elevated levels of secretory TGF-β stimulate NFs transformation into CAFs, which in turn facilitates the malignant progression of breast cancer. Our data implicated ZNF32 as a potential therapeutic strategy against breast cancer.

Synthetic lethal interactions of DEAD/H-box helicases as targets for cancer therapy

DEAD/H-box helicases are implicated in virtually every aspect of RNA metabolism, including transcription, pre-mRNA splicing, ribosomes biogenesis, nuclear export, translation initiation, RNA degradation, and mRNA editing. Most of these helicases are upregulated in various cancers and mutations in some of them are associated with several malignancies. Lately, synthetic lethality (SL) and synthetic dosage lethality (SDL) approaches, where genetic interactions of cancer-related genes are exploited as therapeutic targets, are emerging as a leading area of cancer research. Several DEAD/H-box helicases, including DDX3, DDX9 (Dbp9), DDX10 (Dbp4), DDX11 (ChlR1), and DDX41 (Sacy-1), have been subjected to SL analyses in humans and different model organisms. It remains to be explored whether SDL can be utilized to identity druggable targets in DEAD/H-box helicase overexpressing cancers. In this review, we analyze gene expression data of a subset of DEAD/H-box helicases in multiple cancer types and discuss how their SL/SDL interactions can be used for therapeutic purposes. We also summarize the latest developments in clinical applications, apart from discussing some of the challenges in drug discovery in the context of targeting DEAD/H-box helicases.

DEAD-Box RNA Helicases DDX3X and DDX5 as Oncogenes or Oncosuppressors: A Network Perspective

Simple Summary

The transformation of a normal cell into a cancerous one is caused by the deregulation of different metabolic pathways, involving a complex network of protein–protein interactions. The cellular enzymes DDX3X and DDX5 play important roles in the maintenance of normal cell metabolism, but their deregulation can accelerate tumor transformation. Both DDX3X and DDX5 interact with hundreds of different cellular proteins, and depending on the specific pathways in which they are involved, both proteins can either act as suppressors of cancer or as oncogenes. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about the roles of DDX3X and DDX5 in different tumors. In addition, we present a list of interacting proteins and discuss the possible contribution of some of these protein–protein interactions in determining the roles of DDX3X and DDX5 in the process of cancer proliferation, also suggesting novel hypotheses for future studies.

Abstract

RNA helicases of the DEAD-box family are involved in several metabolic pathways, from transcription and translation to cell proliferation, innate immunity and stress response. Given their multiple roles, it is not surprising that their deregulation or mutation is linked to different pathological conditions, including cancer. However, while in some cases the loss of function of a given DEAD-box helicase promotes tumor transformation, indicating an oncosuppressive role, in other contexts the overexpression of the same enzyme favors cancer progression, thus acting as a typical oncogene. The roles of two well-characterized members of this family, DDX3X and DDX5, as both oncogenes and oncosuppressors have been documented in several cancer types. Understanding the interplay of the different cellular contexts, as defined by the molecular interaction networks of DDX3X and DDX5 in different tumors, with the cancer-specific roles played by these proteins could help to explain their apparently conflicting roles as cancer drivers or suppressors.

DDX5 and DDX17—multifaceted proteins in the regulation of tumorigenesis and tumor progression

DEAD-box (DDX)5 and DDX17, which belong to the DEAD-box RNA helicase family, are nuclear and cytoplasmic shuttle proteins. These proteins are expressed in most tissues and cells and participate in the regulation of normal physiological functions; their abnormal expression is closely related to tumorigenesis and tumor progression. DDX5/DDX17 participate in almost all processes of RNA metabolism, such as the alternative splicing of mRNA, biogenesis of microRNAs (miRNAs) and ribosomes, degradation of mRNA, interaction with long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and coregulation of transcriptional activity. Moreover, different posttranslational modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation, endow DDX5/DDX17 with different functions in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Indeed, DDX5 and DDX17 also interact with multiple key tumor-promoting molecules and participate in tumorigenesis and tumor progression signaling pathways. When DDX5/DDX17 expression or their posttranslational modification is dysregulated, the normal cellular signaling network collapses, leading to many pathological states, including tumorigenesis and tumor development. This review mainly discusses the molecular structure features and biological functions of DDX5/DDX17 and their effects on tumorigenesis and tumor progression, as well as their potential clinical application for tumor treatment.

Circular RNA PUM1 performs as a competing endogenous RNA of microRNA-340-5p to mediate DEAD-box helicase 5 to mitigate cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion damages local brain tissue and impairs brain function, but its specific pathogenesis is still uncertain. Recent studies have clarified circPUM1 is aberrantly elevated in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury; however, circPUM1ʹs function in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-induced neuronal injury remains ambiguous. The results illustrated circPUM1 and DEAD-box helicase 5 were decreased, but microRNA-340-5p was elevated in transient middle cerebral artery occlusion mice and oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-treated SH-SY5Y cells. Knockdown of circPUM1 aggravated the neuronal injury in transient middle cerebral artery occlusion mice and motivated glial cell activation, neuronal apoptosis and inflammation. Enhancing circPUM1 restrained oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-induced SH-SY5Y cell apoptosis, the release of lactate dehydrogenase and inflammatory factors, and activation of nuclear factor-kappaB pathway, while elevating microRNA-340-5p aggravated oxygen glucose deprivation/reoxygenation-induced cell damage. Functional rescue experiments exhibited that the impacts of knockdown or enhancement of circPUM1 were turned around by microRNA-340-5p downregulation and DEAD-box helicase 5 silencing, respectively. Moreover, it was demonstrated that circPUM1 competitively adsorbed microRNA-340-5p to mediate DEAD-box helicase 5. All in all, this study clarifies that circPUM1 mitigates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-induced neuronal injury by targeting the microRNA-340-5p/DEAD-box helicase 5 axis.