1
|
Murray L, Thompson C, Pagett C, Lilley J, Al-Qaisieh B, Svensson S, Eriksson K, Nix M, Aldred M, Aspin L, Gregory S, Appelt A. Treatment plan optimisation for reirradiation. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109545. [PMID: 36813170 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The STRIDeR (Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology) project aims to create a clinically viable re-irradiation planning pathway within a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). Such a pathway should account for previously delivered dose, voxel-by-voxel, taking fractionation effects, tissue recovery and anatomical changes into account. This work presents the workflow and technical solutions in the STRIDeR pathway. METHODS The pathway was implemented in RayStation (version 9B DTK) to allow an original dose distribution to be used as background dose to guide optimisation of re-irradiation plans. Organ at risk (OAR) planning objectives in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) were applied cumulatively across the original and re-irradiation treatments, with optimisation of the re-irradiation plan performed voxel-by-voxel in EQD2. Different approaches to image registration were employed to account for anatomical change. Data from 21 patients who received pelvic Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) re-irradiation were used to illustrate the use of the STRIDeR workflow. STRIDeR plans were compared to those produced using a standard manual method. RESULTS The STRIDeR pathway resulted in clinically acceptable plans in 20/21 cases. Compared to plans produced using the laborious manual method, less constraint relaxation was required or higher re-irradiation doses could be prescribed in 3/21. CONCLUSION The STRIDeR pathway used background dose to guide radiobiologically meaningful, anatomically-appropriate re-irradiation treatment planning within a commercial TPS. This provides a standardised and transparent approach, offering more informed re-irradiation and improved cumulative OAR dose evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Murray
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - Christopher Thompson
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Christopher Pagett
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Bashar Al-Qaisieh
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Michael Nix
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Aldred
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Lynn Aspin
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen Gregory
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Ane Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nix M, Gregory S, Aldred M, Aspin L, Lilley J, Al-Qaisieh B, Uzan J, Svensson S, Dickinson P, Appelt AL, Murray L. Dose summation and image registration strategies for radiobiologically and anatomically corrected dose accumulation in pelvic re-irradiation. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:64-72. [PMID: 34586938 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1982145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Re-irradiation (reRT) is a promising technique for patients with localized recurrence in a previously irradiated area but presents major challenges. These include how to deal with anatomical change between two courses of radiotherapy and integration of radiobiology when summating original and re-irradiation doses. The Support Tool for Re-Irradiation Decisions guided by Radiobiology (STRIDeR) project aims to develop a software tool for use in a commercial treatment planning system to facilitate more informed reRT by accounting for anatomical changes and incorporating radiobiology. We evaluated three approaches to dose summation, incorporating anatomical change and radiobiology to differing extents. METHODS In a cohort of 21 patients who previously received pelvic re-irradiation the following dose summation strategies were compared: (1) Rigid registration (RIR) and physical dose summation, to reflect the current clinical approach, (2) RIR and radiobiological dose summation in equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), and (3) Patient-specific deformable image registration (DIR) with EQD2 dose summation. RESULTS RIR and physical dose summation (Strategy 1) resulted in high cumulative organ at risk (OAR) doses being 'missed' in 14% of cases, which were highlighted by EQD2 dose summation (Strategy 2). DIR (with EQD2 dose summation; Strategy 3) resulted in improved OAR overlap and distance to agreement metrics compared to RIR (with EQD2 dose summation; Strategy 2) and was consistently preferred in terms of clinical utility. DIR was considered to have a clinically important impact on dose summation in 38% of cases. CONCLUSION Re-irradiation cases require individualized assessment when considering dose summation with the previous treatment plan. Fractionation correction is necessary to meaningfully assess cumulative doses and reduce the risk of unintentional OAR overdose. DIR can add clinically relevant information in selected cases, especially for significant anatomical change. Robust solutions for cumulative dose assessment offer the potential for future improved understanding of cumulative OAR tolerances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Nix
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Stephen Gregory
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Michael Aldred
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Lynn Aspin
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - John Lilley
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Bashar Al-Qaisieh
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Julien Uzan
- RaySearch Laboratories AB, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Peter Dickinson
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Louise Murray
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. James' University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jumeau R, Péguret N, Zulliger C, Moeckli R, Bourhis J, Ozsahin EM. Optimization of re-irradiation using deformable registration: a case study. BJR Case Rep 2016; 2:20150412. [PMID: 30363697 PMCID: PMC6180895 DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20150412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Revised: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 12/29/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation is frequently performed in radiotherapy (RT) departments. We present an optimization methodology that takes the previous irradiation into account. A 68-year-old female patient suffering from rectal adenocarcinoma, who had previously undergone RT for metastases to the right iliac bone, presented with a recurrence of metastasis to the L5 and the left sacroiliac joint. Re-irradiation was performed using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). We proceeded to a registration of the previous RT planning CT and RT doses to the new planning CT. Virtual volumes corresponding to the intersection of the small bowel (SB) and each isodose structure were created. We calculated the maximal dose (Dmax) that each virtual structure could receive and considered them as constraints. We called this technique modified VMAT. We compared this technique with a standard VMAT plan and a three-dimensional RT plan. Using the modified VMAT technique, a total dose of 20 Gy in five fractions of 4 Gy was delivered to the planning target volume without any acute toxicity. A composite dosimetry was realized with each technique to compare the dose given to the already irradiated SB. We calculated the Dmax received by the already irradiated SB in equivalent dose of 2 Gy fractions. The Dmax was 46.8, 60 and 52 Gy for modified VMAT, standard VMAT and three-dimensional RT, respectively. Dose deformation was used to create new constraint structures to optimize the dose delivered to surrounding tissues. This methodology is readily feasible in clinical routine to optimize the re-irradiation process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Jumeau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Péguret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Cédric Zulliger
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat-Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV) and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|