1
|
Rinneburger M, Carolus H, Iuga AI, Weisthoff M, Lennartz S, Hokamp NG, Caldeira L, Shahzad R, Maintz D, Laqua FC, Baeßler B, Klinder T, Persigehl T. Automated localization and segmentation of cervical lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT using a 3D foveal fully convolutional neural network. Eur Radiol Exp 2023; 7:45. [PMID: 37505296 PMCID: PMC10382409 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-023-00360-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the management of cancer patients, determination of TNM status is essential for treatment decision-making and therefore closely linked to clinical outcome and survival. Here, we developed a tool for automatic three-dimensional (3D) localization and segmentation of cervical lymph nodes (LNs) on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) examinations. METHODS In this IRB-approved retrospective single-center study, 187 CECT examinations of the head and neck region from patients with various primary diseases were collected from our local database, and 3656 LNs (19.5 ± 14.9 LNs/CECT, mean ± standard deviation) with a short-axis diameter (SAD) ≥ 5 mm were segmented manually by expert physicians. With these data, we trained an independent fully convolutional neural network based on 3D foveal patches. Testing was performed on 30 independent CECTs with 925 segmented LNs with an SAD ≥ 5 mm. RESULTS In total, 4,581 LNs were segmented in 217 CECTs. The model achieved an average localization rate (LR), i.e., percentage of localized LNs/CECT, of 78.0% in the validation dataset. In the test dataset, average LR was 81.1% with a mean Dice coefficient of 0.71. For enlarged LNs with a SAD ≥ 10 mm, LR was 96.2%. In the test dataset, the false-positive rate was 2.4 LNs/CECT. CONCLUSIONS Our trained AI model demonstrated a good overall performance in the consistent automatic localization and 3D segmentation of physiological and metastatic cervical LNs with a SAD ≥ 5 mm on CECTs. This could aid clinical localization and automatic 3D segmentation, which can benefit clinical care and radiomics research. RELEVANCE STATEMENT Our AI model is a time-saving tool for 3D segmentation of cervical lymph nodes on contrast-enhanced CT scans and serves as a solid base for N staging in clinical practice and further radiomics research. KEY POINTS • Determination of N status in TNM staging is essential for therapy planning in oncology. • Segmenting cervical lymph nodes manually is highly time-consuming in clinical practice. • Our model provides a robust, automated 3D segmentation of cervical lymph nodes. • It achieves a high accuracy for localization especially of enlarged lymph nodes. • These segmentations should assist clinical care and radiomics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Rinneburger
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | | | - Andra-Iza Iuga
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mathilda Weisthoff
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Simon Lennartz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nils Große Hokamp
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Liliana Caldeira
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rahil Shahzad
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Innovative Technologies, Philips Healthcare, Aachen, Germany
| | - David Maintz
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Fabian Christopher Laqua
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bettina Baeßler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | - Thorsten Persigehl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longarino FK, Herpel C, Tessonnier T, Mein S, Ackermann B, Debus J, Schwindling FS, Stiller W, Mairani A. Dual-energy CT-based stopping power prediction for dental materials in particle therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023:e13977. [PMID: 37032540 PMCID: PMC10402687 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy with protons or light ions can offer accurate and precise treatment delivery. Accurate knowledge of the stopping power ratio (SPR) distribution of the tissues in the patient is crucial for improving dose prediction in patients during planning. However, materials of uncertain stoichiometric composition such as dental implant and restoration materials can substantially impair particle therapy treatment planning due to related SPR prediction uncertainties. This study investigated the impact of using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) imaging for characterizing and compensating for commonly used dental implant and restoration materials during particle therapy treatment planning. Radiological material parameters of ten common dental materials were determined using two different DECT techniques: sequential acquisition CT (SACT) and dual-layer spectral CT (DLCT). DECT-based direct SPR predictions of dental materials via spectral image data were compared to conventional single-energy CT (SECT)-based SPR predictions obtained via indirect CT-number-to-SPR conversion. DECT techniques were found overall to reduce uncertainty in SPR predictions in dental implant and restoration materials compared to SECT, although DECT methods showed limitations for materials containing elements of a high atomic number. To assess the influence on treatment planning, an anthropomorphic head phantom with a removable tooth containing lithium disilicate as a dental material was used. The results indicated that both DECT techniques predicted similar ranges for beams unobstructed by dental material in the head phantom. When ion beams passed through the lithium disilicate restoration, DLCT-based SPR predictions using a projection-based method showed better agreement with measured reference SPR values (range deviation: 0.2 mm) compared to SECT-based predictions. DECT-based SPR prediction may improve the management of certain non-tissue dental implant and restoration materials and subsequently increase dose prediction accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Friderike K Longarino
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Herpel
- Department of Prosthodontics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Core Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Wolfram Stiller
- Diagnostic & Interventional Radiology (DIR), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Physics, National Center of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Falek S, Regmi R, Herault J, Dore M, Vela A, Dutheil P, Moignier C, Marcy PY, Drouet J, Beddok A, Letwin NE, Epstein J, Parvathaneni U, Thariat J. Dental management in head and neck cancers: from intensity-modulated radiotherapy with photons to proton therapy. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:8377-8389. [PMID: 35513755 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07076-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite reduction of xerostomia with intensity-modulated compared to conformal X-ray radiotherapy, radiation-induced dental complications continue to occur. Proton therapy is promising in head and neck cancers to further reduce radiation-induced side-effects, but the optimal dental management has not been defined. MATERIAL AND METHODS Dental management before proton therapy was assessed compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on a bicentric experience, a literature review and illustrative cases. RESULTS Preserved teeth frequently contain metallic dental restorations (amalgams, crowns, implants). Metals blur CT images, introducing errors in tumour and organ contour during radiotherapy planning. Due to their physical interactions with matter, protons are more sensitive than photons to tissue composition. The composition of restorative materials is rarely documented during radiotherapy planning, introducing dose errors. Manual artefact recontouring, metal artefact-reduction CT algorithms, dual or multi-energy CT and appropriate dose calculation algorithms insufficiently compensate for contour and dose errors during proton therapy. Physical uncertainties may be associated with lower tumour control probability and more side-effects after proton therapy. Metal-induced errors should be quantified and removal of metal restorations discussed on a case by case basis between dental care specialists, radiation oncologists and physicists. Metallic amalgams can be replaced with water-equivalent materials and crowns temporarily removed depending on rehabilitation potential, dental condition and cost. Implants might contraindicate proton therapy if they are in the proton beam path. CONCLUSION Metallic restorations may more severely affect proton than photon radiotherapy quality. Personalized dental care prior to proton therapy requires multidisciplinary assessment of metal-induced errors before choice of conservation/removal of dental metals and optimal radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabah Falek
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Rajesh Regmi
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joel Herault
- Institut Méditerranéen de Protonthérapie, Antoine Lacassagne Center, Nice, France
| | - Melanie Dore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de L'Ouest, Nantes, France
| | - Anthony Vela
- Department of Medical Physics, François Baclesse Center / Proton Therapy Center, Caen, France
| | - Pauline Dutheil
- Department of Medical Physics, François Baclesse Center / Proton Therapy Center, Caen, France
| | - Cyril Moignier
- Department of Medical Physics, François Baclesse Center / Proton Therapy Center, Caen, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Marcy
- Radiodiagnostics and Interventional Radiology, Polyclinique ELSAN, Ollioules, France
| | - Julien Drouet
- Department of Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Francois Baclesse Center, Caen, France
| | - Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Curie Institute, Paris, France
| | - Noah E Letwin
- Swedish Medical Center General Practice Residency, Seattle, WA and owner Seattle Special Care Dentistry, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joel Epstein
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte CA and Cedars-Sinai Medical System, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Upendra Parvathaneni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, USA
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, IN2P3/ENISAEN-CNRS, Caen, France.
- Normandie Universite, Caen, France.
- SAS Cyclhad, Hérouville-Saint-Clair, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams VM, Parvathaneni U, Laramore GE, Aljabab S, Wong TP, Liao JJ. Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Nasopharynx Cancer: 2-year Outcomes from a Single Institution. Int J Part Ther 2021; 8:28-40. [PMID: 34722809 PMCID: PMC8489486 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-20-00057.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Advances in radiotherapy have improved tumor control and reduced toxicity in the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Local failure remains a problem for some patients with advanced primary tumors, and toxicities are significant given the large treatment volume and tumor proximity to critical structures, even with modern photon-based radiotherapy. Proton therapy has unique dosimetric advantages, and recent technological advances now allow delivery of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio in NPC. We report our 2-year clinical outcomes with IMPT for NPC. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed treatment records of patients with NPC treated with IMPT at our center. Demographics, dosimetry, tumor response, local regional control (LRC), distant metastasis, overall survival, and acute and late toxicity outcomes were reviewed. Analyses were performed with descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method. Toxicity was graded per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). Results Twenty-six patients were treated from 2015 to 2020. Median age was 48 years (range, 19–73 years), 62% (n = 16) had T3-T4 disease, 92% (n = 24) were node positive, 92% (n = 24) had stage III-IV disease, and 69% (n = 18) had positive results for Epstein-Barr virus. Dose-painted pencil-beam IMPT was used. Most patients (85%; 22 of 26) were treated with 70 Gy(RBE) in 33 fractions once daily; 4 (15%) underwent hyperfractionated accelerated treatment twice daily. All received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy; 7 (27%) also received induction chemotherapy. All patients (100%) completed the planned radiotherapy, and no acute or late grade 4 or 5 toxicities were observed. At median follow-up of 25 months (range, 4-60), there were 2 local regional failures (8%) and 3 distant metastases (12%). The Kaplan-Meier 2-year LRC, freedom from distant metastasis, and overall survival were 92%, 87%, and 85% respectively. Conclusion IMPT is feasible in locally advanced NPC with early outcomes demonstrating excellent LRC and favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to the growing body of evidence supporting the clinical use of IMPT for NPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vonetta M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Saif Aljabab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Tony P Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hernandez S, Sjogreen C, Gay SS, Nguyen C, Netherton T, Olanrewaju A, Zhang LJ, Rhee DJ, Méndez JD, Court LE, Cardenas CE. Development and dosimetric assessment of an automatic dental artifact classification tool to guide artifact management techniques in a fully automated treatment planning workflow. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2021; 90:101907. [PMID: 33845433 PMCID: PMC8180493 DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 02/05/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: We conducted our study to develop a tool capable of automatically detecting dental artifacts in a CT scan on a slice-by-slice basis and to assess the dosimetric impact of implementing the tool into the Radiation Planning Assistant (RPA), a web-based platform designed to fully automate the radiation therapy treatment planning process. Methods: We developed an automatic dental artifact identification tool and assessed the dosimetric impact of its use in the RPA. Three users manually annotated 83,676 head-and-neck (HN) CT slices (549 patients). Majority-voting was applied to the individual annotations to determine the presence or absence of dental artifacts. The patients were divided into train, cross-validation, and test data sets (ratio: 3:1:1, respectively). A random subset of images without dental artifacts was used to balance classes (1:1) in the training data set. The Inception-V3 deep learning model was trained with the binary cross-entropy loss function. With use of this model, we automatically identified artifacts on 15 RPA HN plans on a slice-by-slice basis and investigated three dental artifact management methods applied before and after volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization. The resulting dose distributions and target coverage were quantified. Results: Per-slice accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 99 %, 91 %, and 99 %, respectively. The model identified all patients with artifacts. Small dosimetric differences in total plan dose were observed between the various density-override methods (±1 Gy). For the pre- and post-optimized plans, 90 % and 99 %, respectively, of dose comparisons resulted in normal structure dose differences of ±1 Gy. Differences in the volume of structures receiving 95 % of the prescribed dose (V95[%]) were ≤0.25 % for 100 % of plans. Conclusion: The dosimetric impact of applying dental artifact management before and after artifact plan optimization was minor. Our results suggest that not accounting for dental artifacts in the current RPA workflow (where only post-optimization dental artifact management is possible) may result in minor dosimetric differences. If RPA users choose to override CT densities as a solution to managing dental artifacts, our results suggest segmenting the volume of the artifact and overriding its density to water is a safe option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soleil Hernandez
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Carlos Sjogreen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Skylar S Gay
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Callistus Nguyen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tucker Netherton
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adenike Olanrewaju
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lifei Joy Zhang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - José David Méndez
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence E Court
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Physics, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Decazes P, Hinault P, Veresezan O, Thureau S, Gouel P, Vera P. Trimodality PET/CT/MRI and Radiotherapy: A Mini-Review. Front Oncol 2021; 10:614008. [PMID: 33614497 PMCID: PMC7890017 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.614008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) has revolutionized external radiotherapy by making it possible to visualize and segment the tumors and the organs at risk in a three-dimensional way. However, if CT is a now a standard, it presents some limitations, notably concerning tumor characterization and delineation. Its association with functional and anatomical images, that are positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), surpasses its limits. This association can be in the form of a trimodality PET/CT/MRI. The objective of this mini-review is to describe the process of performing this PET/CT/MRI trimodality for radiotherapy and its potential clinical applications. Trimodality can be performed in two ways, either a PET/MRI fused to a planning CT (possibly with a pseudo-CT generated from the MRI for the planning), or a PET/CT fused to an MRI and then registered to a planning CT (possibly the CT of PET/CT if calibrated for radiotherapy). These examinations should be performed in the treatment position, and in the second case, a patient transfer system can be used between the PET/CT and MRI to limit movement. If trimodality requires adapted equipment, notably compatible MRI equipment with high-performance dedicated coils, it allows the advantages of the three techniques to be combined with a synergistic effect while limiting their disadvantages when carried out separately. Trimodality is already possible in clinical routine and can have a high clinical impact and good inter-observer agreement, notably for head and neck cancers, brain tumor, prostate cancer, cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Decazes
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | | | - Ovidiu Veresezan
- Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Sébastien Thureau
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
| | - Pierrick Gouel
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Pierre Vera
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Henri Becquerel Cancer Center, Rouen, France
- QuantIF-LITIS EA4108, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hajhamid B, De Souza GM. Irradiation therapy and chewing simulation: effect on zirconia and human enamel. J Prosthodont Res 2020; 65:249-254. [PMID: 33041279 DOI: 10.2186/jpr.jpr_d_20_00018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Ionizing radiation therapy (RT) is the main option for head and neck cancer treatment, but it is associated with multiple side effects. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RT associated with chewing simulation on the surface of human enamel and Yttria-partially stabilized zirconia (Y-TZP). METHODS Maxillary premolar cusps and Y-TZP slabs were divided in 7 experimental groups: CO: no RT (control); EZ groups had irradiation applied to both, enamel and zirconia samples (simulating restoration prior to RT); E groups had irradiation applied to enamel only (simulating restoration after RT). RT doses were either 30, 50 or 70 Gray (Gy). Enamel cusps were abraded against zirconia slabs in a chewing simulator (CS - one million cycles/ 80 N/ 60 mm/min, 2 mm horizontal path, artificial saliva, 37˚ C). Zirconia hardness was evaluated before CS; zirconia roughness and enamel volume (wear) were evaluated before and after CS. Hardness and wear data were analyzed by one-way Analysis of Variance and Tukey post hoc test. Roughness was analyzed by Repeated Measures test and Bonferroni test (p=0.05). RESULTS There was no significant effect of enamel or zirconia irradiation on enamel cusp wear (p=0.226), regardless of the irradiation dose used - up to 70 Gy. Irradiation also did not affect Y-TZP surface roughness (p=0.127) and hardness (p=0.964). CONCLUSIONS RT does not promote significant changes to the surface characteristics of zirconia. Irradiated enamel abraded against zirconia does not show higher wear volume when compared to non-irradiated enamel.
Collapse
|
8
|
Rousselle A, Amelot A, Thariat J, Jacob J, Mercy G, De Marzi L, Feuvret L. Metallic implants and CT artefacts in the CTV area: Where are we in 2020? Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:658-666. [PMID: 32859465 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the main modalities of cancer treatment worldwide with computed tomography (CT), as the most commonly used imaging method for treatment planning system (TPS). Image reconstruction errors may greatly affect all the radiation therapy planning process, such as target delineation, dose calculation and delivery, particularly with particle therapy. Metallic implants, such as hip and spinal implants, and dental filling significantly deteriorate image quality. These hardware structures are often very complex in geometry leading to geometric complex artefacts in the clinical target volume (CTV) area, rendering the delineation of CTV challenging. In our review, we focus on the methods to overcome artefact consequences on CTV delineation: 1- medical approaches anticipating issues associated with imaging artefacts during preoperative multidisciplinary discussions while following standard recommendations; 2- common metal artefact reduction (MAR) methods such as manually override artefact regions, ballistics avoiding beam paths through implanted materials, megavoltage-CT (MVCT); 3- prospects with radiolucent implants, MAR algorithms and various methods of dual energy computed tomography (DECT). Despite substantial and broad evidence for their benefits, there is still no universal solution for cases involving implanted metallic devices. There is still a high need for research efforts to adapt technologies to our issue: "how do I accurately delineate the ideal CTV in a metal artefact area?"
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rousselle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - A Amelot
- Department of Neurosurgery, CHRU de Tours, 37000 Tours, France
| | - J Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre François-Baclesse/ARCHADE, Laboratoire de physique corpusculaire IN2P3-UMR6534 - Normandie Université, 1400 Caen, France
| | - J Jacob
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Mercy
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre universitaire, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - L Feuvret
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, hôpitaux universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles-Foix, 75013 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Branco D, Kry S, Taylor P, Rong J, Zhang X, Peterson C, Frank S, Followill D. Development of a stereoscopic CT metal artifact management algorithm using gantry angle tilts for head and neck patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:120-130. [PMID: 32506820 PMCID: PMC7484887 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Dental amalgams are a common source of artifacts in head and neck (HN) images. Commercial artifact reduction techniques have been offered, but are substantially ineffectual at reducing artifacts from dental amalgams, can produce additional artifacts, provide inaccurate HU information, or require extensive computation time, and thus offer limited clinically utility. The goal of this work was to define and validate a novel algorithm and provide a phantom-based testing as proof of principle. An initial clinical comparison to a vendor's current solution was also performed. The algorithm uses two-angled CT scans in order to generate a single image set with minimal artifacts posterior to the metal implants. The algorithm was evaluated using a phantom simulating a HN patient with dental fillings. Baseline (no artifacts) geometrical measurements of the phantom were taken in the anterior-posterior, left-right, and superior-inferior directions and compared to the metal-corrected images using our algorithm to evaluate possible distortion from application of the algorithm. Mean HU numbers were also compared between the baseline scan and corrected image sets. A similar analysis was performed on the vendor's algorithm for comparison. The algorithm developed in this work successfully preserved the image geometry and HU and corrected the CT metal artifacts in the region posterior to the metal. The average total distortion for all gantry angles in the AP, LR, and SI directions was 0.17, 0.12, and 0.14 mm, respectively. The HU measurements showed significant consistency throughout the different reconstructed images when compared to the baseline image sets. The vendor's algorithm also showed no geometrical distortion but performed inferiorly in the HU number analysis compared to our technique. Our novel metal artifact management algorithm, using CT gantry angle tilts, provides a promising technique for clinical management of metal artifacts from dental amalgam.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Branco
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paige Taylor
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John Rong
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christine Peterson
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steven Frank
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Followill
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aljabab S, Liu A, Wong T, Liao JJ, Laramore GE, Parvathaneni U. Proton Therapy for Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer: Initial Clinical Experience at the University of Washington. Int J Part Ther 2019; 6:1-12. [PMID: 32582809 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00053.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 10/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton therapy can potentially improve the therapeutic ratio over conventional radiation therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) by decreasing acute and late toxicity. We report our early clinical experience with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with OPSCC treated with IMPT at our center. Endpoints include local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumor response, and toxicity outcomes. Toxicity was graded as per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.03. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier method were used. Results We treated 46 patients from March 2015 to August 2017. Median age was 58 years, 93.5% were male, 67% were nonsmokers, 98% had stage III-IVB disease per the 7th edition of the AJCC [American Joint Committee on Cancer] Cancer Staging Manual, and 89% were p16 positive. Twenty-eight patients received definitive IMPT to total dose of 70 to 74.4 Gy(RBE), and 18 patients received postoperative IMPT to 60 to 66 Gy(RBE) following transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Sixty-four percent of patients received concurrent systemic therapy. There were no treatment interruptions or observed acute grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Eighteen patients had percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement; the majority (14) were placed prophylactically. The most common grade 3 acute toxicities were dermatitis (76%) and mucositis (72%). The most common late toxicity was grade 2 xerostomia (30%). At a median follow-up time of 19.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 11.2-28.4), primary complete response was 100% and nodal complete response was 92%. One patient required a salvage neck dissection owing to an incomplete response at 4 months. There were no recorded local regional or marginal recurrences, PFS was 93.5%, and OS was 95.7%. Conclusion Our early results for IMPT in OPSCC are promising with no local regional or marginal recurrences and a favorable toxicity profile. Our data add to a body of evidence that supports the clinical use of IMPT. Randomized comparative trials are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Aljabab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Tony Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jay J Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - George E Laramore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Upendra Parvathaneni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eekers DB, Roelofs E, Jelen U, Kirk M, Granzier M, Ammazzalorso F, Ahn PH, Janssens GO, Hoebers FJ, Friedmann T, Solberg T, Walsh S, Troost EG, Kaanders JH, Lambin P. Benefit of particle therapy in re-irradiation of head and neck patients. Results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:387-394. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2015] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|