1
|
Chen CY, Huang BS, Hong JH, Chang JTC, Chen MC, Tang WR, Shun SC, Chen ML. Persistent Fatigue in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Radiotherapy. J Nurs Res 2024; 32:e319. [PMID: 38506576 DOI: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy has attracted much attention in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the association between radiotherapy-related fatigue and HCC has been examined in only a few studies. PURPOSE This study was designed to explore the change over time in fatigue in patients with HCC treated with radiotherapy and related factors. METHODS One hundred patients were enrolled in this prospective longitudinal study using convenience sampling at a medical center in northern Taiwan. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale, the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form, and the psychological subscale of Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form were used to assess the symptoms at five time points: before radiotherapy (T0), during treatment (T1), and at 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after radiotherapy. The generalized estimating equations method was used to determine the changes in fatigue and the influencing factors. RESULTS Fatigue levels at T1, T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than that at T0. Higher fatigue was significantly associated with lower income and poorer functional status. Having worse pain levels and psychological symptoms were both associated with higher fatigue. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The results indicate fatigue does not recover to the baseline (pretherapy) level by 6 months after radiotherapy. Thus, fatigue in patients with HCC receiving radiotherapy should be regularly and effectively assessed, and patients experiencing pain and psychological symptoms should be given greater attention from clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiao-Yi Chen
- MS, RN, School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Shen Huang
- MD, Associate Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Hong Hong
- MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang
- MD, MHA, Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital; and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Min-Chi Chen
- PhD, Professor, Department of Public Health and Biostatistics Consulting Center, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Woung-Ru Tang
- PhD, RN, Professor, School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shiow-Ching Shun
- PhD, RN, Professor, School of Nursing, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Mei-Ling Chen
- PhD, RN, Professor, School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan; and Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang W, Cai X, Sun J, Wang W, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Jiang G, Wang Z. Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023; 10:2397-2409. [PMID: 38169909 PMCID: PMC10759913 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s429186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, evidence of using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to treat moving liver tumors remains lacking. The present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of PBS CIRT in patients with HCC. Methods Between January 2016 and October 2021, 90 consecutive HCC patients treated with definitive CIRT in our center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-eight patients received relative biological effectiveness-weighted doses of 50-70 Gy in 10 fractions, and 32 received 60-67.5 Gy in 15 fractions, which were determined by the tumor location and normal tissue constraints. Active motion-management techniques and necessary strategies were adopted to mitigate interplay effects efficiently. Oncologic outcomes and toxicities were evaluated. Results The median follow-up time was 28.6 months (range 5.7-74.6 months). The objective response rate was 75.0% for all 90 patients with 100 treated lesions. The overall survival rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 97.8%, 83.3% and 75.4%, respectively. The local control rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 96.4%, 96.4% and 93.1%, respectively. Radiation-induced liver disease was not documented, and 4 patients (4.4%) had their Child-Pugh score elevated by 1 point after CIRT. No grade 3 or higher acute non-hematological toxicities were observed. Six patients (6.7%) experienced grade 3 or higher late toxicities. Conclusion The active scanning technique was clinically feasible to treat HCC by applying necessary mitigation measures for interplay effects. The desirable oncologic outcomes as well as favorable toxicity profiles presented in this study will be a valuable reference for other carbon-ion centers using the PBS technique and local effect model-based system, and add to a growing body of evidence about the role of CIRT in the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenna Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiayao Sun
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jingfang Zhao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guoliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Volpe S, Piperno G, Colombo F, Biffi A, Comi S, Mastroleo F, Maria Camarda A, Casbarra A, Cattani F, Corrao G, de Marinis F, Spaggiari L, Guckenberger M, Orecchia R, Alterio D, Alicja Jereczek-Fossa B. Hypofractionated proton therapy for non-small cell lung cancer: Ready for prime time? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 110:102464. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
4
|
Proton Therapy in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122900. [PMID: 35740567 PMCID: PMC9220794 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation therapy is among the locoregional therapy modalities used to treat unresectable or medically inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Proton radiation therapy plays a major role in the treatment of HCC, especially when liver toxicity is a concern. The aim of this review is to provide a concise and comprehensive summary on the use of proton therapy in the management of HCC. Abstract Proton radiation therapy plays a central role in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because of the near-zero exit dose and improved sparing of normal liver parenchyma, protons are being used even in challenging scenarios, including larger or multifocal liver tumors, and those associated with vascular tumor thrombus. There is a mounting level of evidence that suggests that protons are superior to photons in terms of survival and toxicity outcomes, specifically the progression to liver failure. A randomized controlled trial comparing protons to photons is currently underway to verify this hypothesis.
Collapse
|
5
|
The Role of Hypofractionation in Proton Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092271. [PMID: 35565400 PMCID: PMC9104796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypofractionated radiotherapy is an attractive approach for minimizing patient burden and treatment cost. Technological advancements in external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) delivery and image guidance have resulted in improved targeting and conformality of the absorbed dose to the disease and a reduction in dose to healthy tissue. These advances in EBRT have led to an increasing adoption and interest in hypofractionation. Furthermore, for many treatment sites, proton beam therapy (PBT) provides an improved absorbed dose distribution compared to X-ray (photon) EBRT. In the past 10 years there has been a notable increase in reported clinical data involving hypofractionation with PBT, reflecting the interest in this treatment approach. This review will discuss the reported clinical data and radiobiology of hypofractionated PBT. Over 50 published manuscripts reporting clinical results involving hypofractionation and PBT were included in this review, ~90% of which were published since 2010. The most common treatment regions reported were prostate, lung and liver, making over 70% of the reported results. Many of the reported clinical data indicate that hypofractionated PBT can be well tolerated, however future clinical trials are still needed to determine the optimal fractionation regime.
Collapse
|
6
|
Yoo GS, Yu JI, Park HC. Current role of proton beam therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION 2021. [DOI: 10.18528/ijgii210043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tsai YL, Takei H, Iizumi T, Okumura T, Sekino Y, Numajiri H, Ishikawa H, Sakae T, Sakurai H. Capacity of proton beams in preserving normal liver tissue during proton beam therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:133-141. [PMID: 33392617 PMCID: PMC7779355 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Unirradiated liver volume (ULV) preservation rate is an important factor associated with radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton beam therapy (PBT). The purpose of this study is to identify the predictors for ULV preservation and quantify the capacity of proton beams in normal liver sparing during PBT. We reviewed planning data of 92 patients with single intrahepatic HCC tumors undergoing PBT. The potential clinical and planning factors that may affect ULV preservation were involved in multiple linear regression for ULV preservation rate. The significant factors were determined to be predictors and their influences were quantified. The median ULV preservation rate was 62.08%. All the assessed clinical factors showed significant effects on ULV preservation rate: clinical target volume (CTV), P < 0.001; portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT), P = 0.010; left lobe tumor, P = 0.010. In contrast, none of the planning factors demonstrated significance. The coefficients of significant factors in multiple linear regression were 60.85 for intercept, -0.02 for CTV, -9.01 for PVTT and 8.31 for left lobe tumors. The capacity of proton beams to spare normal liver tissue during PBT for HCC is mainly affected by clinical factors. The baseline of the ULV preservation rate is 60.85%, decreasing 0.02% with each milliliter of CTV increase and 9.01% for tumors with PVTT, and increasing 8.31% for tumors limited to the left lobe. Further clinical studies should be carried out to correlate our dosimetric findings with clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Lun Tsai
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiation Oncology, Cathay General Hospital, 280 Renai Rd. Sec.4, Taipei, Taiwan. Tel: +886227082121#3711; E-mail:
| | - Hideyuki Takei
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Okumura
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Yuta Sekino
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Haruko Numajiri
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Ishikawa
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Takeji Sakae
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang CC, McNamara AL, Shin J, Schuemann J, Grassberger C, Taghian AG, Jimenez RB, MacDonald SM, Paganetti H. End-of-Range Radiobiological Effect on Rib Fractures in Patients Receiving Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:449-454. [PMID: 32240774 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A prospective trial of proton therapy for breast cancer revealed an increased rib fracture rate of 7%, which is higher than the expected rate based on the literature on photon therapies. We aim to evaluate the hypothesis that the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) at the distal edge of proton beams is the cause. METHODS AND MATERIALS We combined the cohort from the prospective clinical trial and a retrospective cohort from a database. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to recalculate the physical dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd). The first 10 ribs and fracture areas in patients with fractures were contoured and deformably registered. The LETd-weighted dose was used as a surrogate for biological effectiveness and compared with the conventional fixed RBE of 1.1. Dose to 0.5 cm3 of the ribs (D0.5) was selected to analyze the dose-response relationship using logistic regression. We chose an alpha/beta ratio of 3 to calculate the biological effective dose in Gy3(RBE). RESULTS Thirteen of 203 patients in the cohorts exhibited a total of 25 fractures. The LETd in fractured areas is increased (6.1 ± 2.0 keV/μm, mean ± standard deviation), suggesting possible end-of-range radiobiological effects with increased RBE. The D0.5 of the fractured ribs is 80.3 ± 9.4 Gy3(RBE) with a generic factor of 1.1 and is relatively low compared with historical photon results. On the other hand, the D0.5 of the fractured ribs is 100.0 ± 12.5 Gy3(RBE) using the LETd-based model with a dose-response curve that is more consistent with historical photon data. CONCLUSIONS The increased rib fracture rate seen in our trial is probably associated with the increased LETd and RBE at the distal edge of proton beams. This phenomenon warrants further investigation and possible integration of LETd into treatment planning and optimization in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Chun Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Aimee L McNamara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jungwook Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alphonse G Taghian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yoo GS, Yu JI, Park HC. Proton therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Current knowledges and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol 2018; 24:3090-3100. [PMID: 30065555 PMCID: PMC6064962 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i28.3090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death, as few patients can be treated with currently available curative local modalities. In patients with HCC where curative modalities are not feasible, radiation therapy (RT) has emerged as an alternative or combination therapy. With the development of various technologies, RT has been increasingly used for the management of HCC. Among these advances, proton beam therapy (PBT) has several unique physical properties that give it a finite range in a distal direction, and thus no exit dose along the beam path. Therefore, PBT has dosimetric advantages compared with X-ray therapy for the treatment of HCC. Indeed, various reports in the literature have described the favorable clinical outcomes and improved safety of PBT for HCC patients compared with X-ray therapy. However, there are some technical issues regarding the use of PBT in HCC, including uncertainty of organ motion and inaccuracy during calculation of tissue density and beam range, all of which may reduce the robustness of a PBT treatment plan. In this review, we discuss the physical properties, current clinical data, technical issues, and future perspectives on PBT for the treatment of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul 06351, South Korea
- Department of Medical Device Management and Research, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul 06351, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|