Development of an Immobilization Device for Total Marrow Irradiation

Deep learning and atlas-based models to streamline the segmentation workflow of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation

PURPOSE

To improve the workflow of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) by enhancing the delineation of organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) using deep learning (DL) and atlas-based (AB) segmentation models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-five TMLI plans optimized in our institute were analyzed. Two commercial DL software were tested for segmenting 18 OARs. An AB model for lymph node CTV (CTV_LN) delineation was built using 20 TMLI patients. The AB model was evaluated on 20 independent patients, and a semiautomatic approach was tested by correcting the automatic contours. The generated OARs and CTV_LN contours were compared to manual contours in terms of topological agreement, dose statistics, and time workload. A clinical decision tree was developed to define a specific contouring strategy for each OAR.

RESULTS

The two DL models achieved a median [interquartile range] dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.84 [0.71;0.93] and 0.85 [0.70;0.93] across the OARs. The absolute median Dmean difference between manual and the two DL models was 2.0 [0.7;6.6]% and 2.4 [0.9;7.1]%. The AB model achieved a median DSC of 0.70 [0.66;0.74] for CTV_LN delineation, increasing to 0.94 [0.94;0.95] after manual revision, with minimal Dmean differences. Since September 2022, our institution has implemented DL and AB models for all TMLI patients, reducing from 5 to 2 h the time required to complete the entire segmentation process.

CONCLUSION

DL models can streamline the TMLI contouring process of OARs. Manual revision is still necessary for lymph node delineation using AB models.

Feasibility study of total marrow lymphoid irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy: clinical implementation in a tertiary care center

PURPOSE

Total marrow lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is challenging due to large treatment fields with multiple isocenters, field matching at junctions, and targets being surrounded by many organs at risk. This study aimed to describe our methodology for safe dose escalation and accurate dose delivery of TMLI treatment with the VMAT technique based on early experience at our center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired in head-first supine and feet-first supine orientations for each patient with an overlap at mid-thigh. VMAT plans were generated for 20 patients on the head-first CT images with either three or four isocenters in the Eclipse treatment planning system (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA) and the treatment was delivered in a Clinac 2100 C/D linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems Inc., Palo Alto, CA).

RESULTS

Five patients were treated with a prescription dose of 13.5 Gy in 9 fractions and 15 patients were treated with an escalated dose of 15 Gy in 10 fractions. The mean doses to 95% of the clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 14.3 ± 0.3 Gy and 13.6 ± 0.7 Gy for the prescription doses of 15 Gy, and 13 ± 0.2 Gy and 12.3 ± 0.3 Gy for the prescription doses of 13.5 Gy, respectively. Mean dose to the lung in both schedules was 8.7 ± 0.6 Gy. The overall time taken to execute the treatment plans was approximately 2 h for the first fraction and 1.5 h for subsequent fractions. The average in-room time of 15.5 h per patient over 5 days leads to potential changes in the regular treatment schedules for other patients.

CONCLUSION

This feasibility study highlights the methodology adopted for safe implementation of TMLI with the VMAT technique at our institution. Escalation of dose to the target with adequate coverage and sparing of critical structures was achieved with the adopted treatment technique. Clinical implementation of this methodology at our center could serve as a practical guide to start the VMAT-based TMLI program safely by others who are keen to start this service.

Impact of the Extremities Positioning on the Set-Up Reproducibility for the Total Marrow Irradiation Treatment

Total marrow (lymph node) irradiation (TMI/TMLI) delivery requires more time than standard radiotherapy treatments. The patient's extremities, through the joints, can experience large movements. The reproducibility of TMI/TMLI patients' extremities was evaluated to find the best positioning and reduce unwanted movements. Eighty TMI/TMLI patients were selected (2013-2022). During treatment, a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed for each isocenter to reposition the patient. CBCT-CT pairs were evaluated considering: (i) online vector shift (OVS) that matched the two series; (ii) residual vector shift (RVS) to reposition the patient's extremities; (iii) qualitative agreement (range 1-5). Patients were subdivided into (i) arms either leaning on the frame or above the body; (ii) with or without a personal cushion for foot positioning. The Mann-Whitney test was considered (p < 0.05 significant). Six-hundred-twenty-nine CBCTs were analyzed. The median OVS was 4.0 mm, with only 1.6% of cases ranked < 3, and 24% of RVS > 10 mm. Arms leaning on the frame had significantly smaller RVS than above the body (median: 8.0 mm/6.0 mm, p < 0.05). Using a personal cushion for the feet significantly improved the RVS than without cushions (median: 8.5 mm/1.8 mm, p < 0.01). The role and experience of the radiotherapy team are fundamental to optimizing the TMI/TMLI patient setup.

Automatic planning of the lower extremities for total marrow irradiation using volumetric modulated arc therapy

PURPOSE

Total marrow (and lymphoid) irradiation (TMI-TMLI) is limited by the couch travel range of modern linacs, which forces the treatment delivery to be split into two plans with opposite orientations: a head-first supine upper-body plan, and a feet-first supine lower extremities plan. A specific field junction is thus needed to obtain adequate target coverage in the overlap region of the two plans. In this study, an automatic procedure was developed for field junction creation and lower extremities plan optimization.

METHODS

Ten patients treated with TMI-TMLI at our institution were selected retrospectively. The planning of the lower extremities was performed automatically. Target volume parameters (CTV_J‑V_98% > 98%) at the junction region and several dose statistics (D_98%, D_mean, and D_2%) were compared between automatic and manual plans. The modulation complexity score (MCS) was used to assess plan complexity.

RESULTS

The automatic procedure required 60-90 min, depending on the case. All automatic plans achieved clinically acceptable dosimetric results (CTV_J‑V_98% > 98%), with significant differences found at the junction region, where D_mean and D_2% increased on average by 2.4% (p < 0.03) and 3.0% (p < 0.02), respectively. Similar plan complexity was observed (median MCS = 0.12). Since March 2022, the automatic procedure has been introduced in our clinic, reducing the TMI-TMLI simulation-to-delivery schedule by 2 days.

CONCLUSION

The developed procedure allowed treatment planning of TMI-TMLI to be streamlined, increasing efficiency and standardization, preventing human errors, while maintaining the dosimetric plan quality and complexity of manual plans. Automated strategies can simplify the future adoption and clinical implementation of TMI-TMLI treatments in new centers.

Internal Guidelines for Reducing Lymph Node Contour Variability in Total Marrow and Lymph Node Irradiation

BACKGROUND

The total marrow and lymph node irradiation (TMLI) target includes the bones, spleen, and lymph node chains, with the latter being the most challenging structures to contour. We evaluated the impact of introducing internal contour guidelines to reduce the inter- and intraobserver lymph node delineation variability in TMLI treatments.

METHODS

A total of 10 patients were randomly selected from our database of 104 TMLI patients so as to evaluate the guidelines' efficacy. The lymph node clinical target volume (CTV_LN) was recontoured according to the guidelines (CTV_LN_GL_RO1) and compared to the historical guidelines (CTV_LN_Old). Both topological (i.e., Dice similarity coefficient (DSC)) and dosimetric (i.e., V95 (the volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose) metrics were calculated for all paired contours.

RESULTS

The mean DSCs were 0.82 ± 0.09, 0.97 ± 0.01, and 0.98 ± 0.02, respectively, for CTV_LN_Old vs. CTV_LN_GL_RO1, and between the inter- and intraobserver contours following the guidelines. Correspondingly, the mean CTV_LN-V95 dose differences were 4.8 ± 4.7%, 0.03 ± 0.5%, and 0.1 ± 0.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines reduced the CTV_LN contour variability. The high target coverage agreement revealed that historical CTV-to-planning-target-volume margins were safe, even if a relatively low DSC was observed.

The impact of different optimization strategies on the agreement between planned and delivered doses during volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation

Aim of the study

To evaluate the agreement between planned and delivered doses and its potential correlation with the plans' complexity subjected to dosimetric verification.

Material and methods

Four isocentre volumetric modulated arc therapy for total marrow irradiation plans optimized simultaneously with (P1) and without (P2) MU reduction were evaluated dosimetrically by γ method performed in a global mode for 4 combinations of γ-index criteria (2%/2 mm, 2%/3 mm, 3%/2 mm, and 3%/3 mm). The evaluation was conducted for 4 regions (head and neck, chest, abdomen and upper pelvis, and lower pelvis and thighs) that were determined geometrically by the isocentres. The Wilcoxon test was used to detect significant differences between γ passing rate (GPR) analysis results for the P1 and P2 plans. The Pearson correlation was used to check the relationship between GPR and the plans' complexity.

Results

Except for the head and neck region, the P2 plans had better GPRs than the P1 plans. Only for hard combinations of γ-index criteria (i.e. 2%/3 mm, 2%/2 mm) were the GPRs differences between P1 and P2 clinically meaningful, and they were detected in the chest, abdomen and upper pelvis, and lower pelvis and thighs regions. The highest correlations between GPR and the indices describing the plans' complexity were found for the chest region. No correlation was found for the head and neck region.

Conclusions

The P2 plans showed better agreement between planned and delivered doses compared to the P1 plans. The GPR and the plans' complexity depend on the anatomy region and are most important for the chest region.

Automatic treatment planning for VMAT-based total body irradiation using Eclipse scripting

The purpose of this work is to establish an automated approach for a multiple isocenter volumetric arc therapy (VMAT)‐based TBI treatment planning approach. Five anonymized full‐body CT imaging sets were used. A script was developed to automate and standardize the treatment planning process using the Varian Eclipse v15.6 Scripting API. The script generates two treatment plans: a head‐first VMAT‐based plan for upper body coverage using four isocenters and a total of eight full arcs; and a feet‐first AP/PA plan with three isocenters that covers the lower extremities of the patient. PTV was the entire body cropped 5 mm from the patient surface and extended 3 mm into the lungs and kidneys. Two plans were generated for each case: one to a total dose of 1200 cGy in 8 fractions and a second one to a total dose of 1320 cGy in 8 fractions. Plans were calculated using the AAA algorithm and 6 MV photon energy. One plan was created and delivered to an anthropomorphic phantom containing 12 OSLDs for in‐vivo dose verification. For the plans prescribed to 1200 cGy total dose the following dosimetric results were achieved: median PTV V100% = 94.5%; median PTV D98% = 89.9%; median lungs Dmean = 763 cGy; median left kidney Dmean = 1058 cGy; and median right kidney Dmean = 1051 cGy. For the plans prescribed to 1320 cGy total dose the following dosimetric results were achieved: median PTV V100% = 95.0%; median PTV D98% = 88.7%; median lungs Dmean = 798 cGy; median left kidney Dmean = 1059 cGy; and median right kidney Dmean = 1064 cGy. Maximum dose objective was met for all cases. The dose deviation between the treatment planning dose and the dose measured by the OSLDs was within ±4%. In summary, we have demonstrated that scripting can produce high‐quality plans based on predefined dose objectives and can decrease planning time by automatic target and optimization contours generation, plan creation, field and isocenter placement, and optimization objectives setup.

Total marrow and lymphoid irradiation with helical tomotherapy: a practical implementation report

Purpose

To standardize the technique; evaluate resources requirements and analyze our early experience of total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI) as part of the conditioning regimen before allogenic bone marrow transplantation using helical tomotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Computed tomography (CT) scanning and treatment were performed in head first supine (HFS) and feet first supine (FFS) orientations with an overlap at mid-thigh. Patients along with the immobilization device were manually rotated by 180° to change the orientation after the delivery of HFS plan. The dose at the junction was contributed by a complementary dose gradient from each of the plans. Plan was to deliver 95% of 12 Gy to 98% of clinical target volume with dose heterogeneity <10% and pre-specified organs-at-risk dose constraints. Megavoltage-CT was used for position verification before each fraction. Patient specific quality assurance and in vivo film dosimetry to verify junction dose were performed in all patients.

Results

Treatment was delivered in two daily fractions of 2 Gy each for 3 days with at least 8-hour gap between each fraction. The target coverage goals were met in all the patients. The average person-hours per patient were 16.5, 21.5, and 25.75 for radiation oncologist, radiation therapist, and medical physicist, respectively. Average in-room time per patient was 9.25 hours with an average beam-on time of 3.32 hours for all the 6 fractions.

Conclusion

This report comprehensively describes technique and resource requirements for TMLI and would serve as a practical guide for departments keen to start this service. Despite being time and labor intensive, it can be implemented safely and robustly.