Bronchoscopy precautions and recommendations in the COVID-19 pandemic

Experience with flexible bronchoscopy for noncoronavirus disease of 2019 indications in pediatric patients during the coronavirus disease of 2019 pandemic

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) poses a risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission due to aerosol generation. This study aimed to assess the utilization, indications, outcomes, and safety of FB in pediatric patients for noncoronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) reasons during the pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed pediatric patients who underwent FB for non-COVID-19 indications at a tertiary children's hospital's pulmonary clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients showed no COVID-19 symptoms and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of nasopharyngeal and throat swabs within 24 h before the procedure. FBs were conducted in the operating room, with healthcare professionals (HCPs) wearing personal protective equipment, including medical N95 masks, gloves, gowns, and eye protection.

RESULTS

Between March 2020 and April 2022, 167 pediatric patients underwent FB for non-COVID-19 indications. Common indications included foreign body aspiration (22.7%), stridor (10.1%), and atelectasis (8.9%). No COVID-19 symptoms were observed in patients on the 1st and 10th days post-FB. During the 1-month follow-up, 52 patients underwent SARSCoV-2 PCR testing, and one patient tested positive in the third week after the procedure. None of the HCPs in the FB team experienced COVID-19 symptoms or tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

CONCLUSION

A bronchoscopy protocol with safety precautions minimized the risk of COVID-19 transmission, allowing safe FB performance for non-COVID-19 indications in pediatric patients during the pandemic. The experience gained in FB during COVID-19 is valuable for similar situations in the future.

Bronchoscopy for removal of foreign body: What's the big deal?

Foreign bodies of the airway are common occurrences in the pediatric population. Children requiring anesthesia for removal of airway foreign bodies can present many challenges. In this case, the patient required urgent removal of a foreign body while symptomatic with upper and lower respiratory symptoms. Circumstances such as these can result in higher intraoperative and postoperative complications. This presentation describes the clinical decision-making process and the discussion of common modalities for diagnosis, treatment, and anesthetic management.

Routine Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections Misses a Significant Proportion of Invasive Aspergillosis in Patients with Severe COVID-19

Rates of invasive aspergillosis (IA) among COVID-19 ICU patients seem to reach over 30% in certain settings. At Vienna General Hospital (VGH), all rooms in COVID-19 ICUs were put under negative pressure as a protective measure, thus increasing the risk of exposure to environmental pathogens for patients. Even though all ICU patients are surveilled for healthcare-associated infections (HAI), there were concerns that the routine protocol might not be sufficient for IA detection. We reviewed the electronic patient charts of all patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICUs between 1 March 2020 and 31 July 2021 for fungal co- or superinfections, comparing four diagnostic algorithms based on different recommendations for the diagnosis of IA (according to EORTC/MSG, BM-AspICU, IAPA and CAPA) to our routine surveillance protocol. We found that out of 252 patients who were admitted to the ICU during the study period, 25 (9.9%) fulfilled the criteria of probable or possible IA of at least one algorithm. The IAPA definitions detected 25 and the CAPA definition 23 probable and 2 possible cases, out of which only 16 were classified as hospital-acquired IA by routine surveillance. In conclusion, adjustment of the routine protocol using a classification system especially designed for respiratory viral illness seems useful for the surveillance of IA in a highly vulnerable patient cohort.

Indications, Clinical Utility, and Safety of Bronchoscopy in COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Bronchoscopy is an aerosol-generating procedure and routine use for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been discouraged. The purpose of this review was to discuss the indications, clinical utility, and risks associated with bronchoscopy in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia.

METHODS

A literature search was performed by using appropriate key terms to identify all relevant articles from medical literature databases up to August 1, 2021.

RESULTS

Twelve cohorts (9 retrospective and 3 prospective) reported the performance of 2,245 bronchoscopies in 1,345 patients with COVID-19. The majority of the subjects were male. Nearly two thirds of the bronchoscopies (62%) were performed for therapeutic indications; the rest (38%) were for diagnostic purposes. Bronchoalveolar lavage had an overall yield of 33.1% for SARS-CoV-2 in subjects with negative results of real-time polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal specimens. The incidence of a secondary infection ranged from 9.3% to as high as 65%. Antibiotics were changed in a significant number of the subjects (14%-83%) based on the bronchoscopic findings. Bronchoscopy was well tolerated in most subjects except those who required noninvasive ventilation, in whom the intubation rate after the procedure was 60%. The rate of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among health-care workers was minimum.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchoscopy in patients with COVID-19 results in a significant change in patient management. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 seems to be low with consistent use of appropriate personal protective equipment by health-care workers. Therefore, bronchoscopic evaluation should be considered for all diagnostic and therapeutic indications in this patient population.

The role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis

Bronchoscopy is useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in children with Tuberculosis (TB) disease complicated by airway obstruction. It is needed in children when surgical intervention may be required for airway compression, when drug resistance is suspected, and to rule out an alternative diagnosis for airway obstruction. Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) should be performed when other, less invasive samples cannot be collected, or when they fail to provide useful diagnostic information. BAL specimens collected at bronchoscopy can be tested using molecular TB assays and mycobacterial culture. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of bronchoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pulmonary TB in children, and, specifically, to review the role of interventional bronchoscopy. A search of electronic databases was undertaken using the online databases PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Advanced Scholar, and Web of Science to identify relevant literature. The search was limited to pediatrics, pulmonology, bronchoscopy, and pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis for all articles published in English on pediatric bronchoscopy between 2010 and 2020. Recent advances in pediatric bronchoscopy was included, as well as recent research on improving the diagnosis with the use of interventional bronchoscopy. The role of bronchoscopy in pediatric pulmonary tuberculosis has changed during the last decade, from a simple method of collecting samples for bacteriological conformation to an more sophisticate procedure. New methods are available for collecting samples, which includes the use of Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and also better methods of bacteriological conformation. Interventions are now possible; not only to improve the diagnostic abilities of bronchoscopy but also to diagnose, manage, and follow-up upon airway-related complications. Bronchoscopy services remain limited in resource-limited countries due to the high cost of equipment.