1
|
Luo B, Dong F, Liu Y, Du J, Sun H, Ni Y, Zhang Y. Insights into the microbiota of raw milk from seven breeds animals distributing in Xinjiang China. Front Microbiol 2024; 15:1382286. [PMID: 39507343 PMCID: PMC11537933 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1382286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Owing to its high nutritional content, raw milk contains a rich microbiota. Thus, to study microorganisms present in raw milk available in Xinjiang China, 142 raw milk samples from seven animal breeds (cow, sheep, goat, donkey, horse, camel, and yak) and four regions (Hami, Tarbagatay, Kashgar, and Ili) were analyzed by high-throughput DNA sequencing. These microorganisms were characterized by 10 dominant phyla. Proteobacteria (68.33%) was the major phylum, followed by Firmicutes (18.80%) and Thermi (3.16%). Horse milk contained more Bacteroidetes, sheep milk contained more Gammaproteobacteria, and donkey milk contained more unclassified sequences. Camel and donkey milk contained the highest and lowest bacterial diversity compared with that contained by the remaining milk samples, respectively. Additionally, spoilage microorganisms, including Chryseobacterium, Propionibacterium, and Flavobacterium, and pathogenic bacteria, including Ochrobactrum anthropi and Sphingomonas, were more prevalent in horse and yak milk, whereas probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB), such as Leuconostoc, Lactococcus, or Lactobacillus, were more prevalent in goat, donkey, and camel milk. Furthermore, Moraxella was abundantly present in goat, camel, and yak milk, Acinetobacter was more abundant in camel milk, and Pseudomonas was relatively abundant in sheep and donkey milk. Overall, specific harmful microorganisms and probiotic lactic acid bacteria were found in the raw milk samples obtained from different animals, which provided a basis for preventing and controlling the growth of harmful bacteria, as well as investigating probiotic resources in raw milk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baolong Luo
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Industrial Innovation Research Institute of Dairy Products, Xinjiang Tianrun Dairy Co., Ltd., Urumchi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Fujin Dong
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yuyang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Jie Du
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Hailong Sun
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Industrial Innovation Research Institute of Dairy Products, Xinjiang Tianrun Dairy Co., Ltd., Urumchi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yongqing Ni
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Industrial Innovation Research Institute of Dairy Products, Xinjiang Tianrun Dairy Co., Ltd., Urumchi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Special Probiotics and Dairy Technology of Shihezi Municipal Government, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory of Agricultural Product Processing and Quality Control of Specialty (Co-construction by Ministry and Province), School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
- Key Laboratory for Food Nutrition and Safety Control of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, School of Food Science and Technology, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zainol MFA, Safiyanu MB, Aziz SA, Omar AR, Chuang KP, Mariatulqabtiah AR. Campylobacteriosis and Control Strategies against Campylobacters in Poultry Farms. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2024; 34:987-993. [PMID: 38719774 PMCID: PMC11180925 DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2311.11045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Campylobacteriosis is a significant foodborne illness caused by Campylobacter bacteria. It is one of the most common bacterial causes of gastroenteritis worldwide, with poultry being a major reservoir and source of infection in humans. In poultry farms, Campylobacters colonize the intestinal tract of chickens and contaminate meat during processing. Vaccines under development against Campylobacters in poultry showed partial or no protection against their cecal colonization. Therefore, this review will elaborate on campylobacteriosis and emphasize the control strategies and recent vaccine trials against Campylobacters in poultry farms. The epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of Campylobacter infection, along with specific mention of poultry Campylobacter contamination events in Malaysia, will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamad Fadzirul Anwar Zainol
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Mansur Bala Safiyanu
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Department of Science Laboratory Technology, School of Science Engineering and Technology, Federal Polytechnic Daura, P.M.B 1049, Daura, Katsina State, Nigeria
| | - Saleha Abd Aziz
- Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Abdul Rahman Omar
- Department of Veterinary Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Laboratory of Vaccine and Biomolecules, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Kuo Pin Chuang
- International Degree Program in Animal Vaccine Technology, International College, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Animal Vaccine Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
- School of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Companion Animal Research Centre, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 912, Taiwan
| | - Abdul Razak Mariatulqabtiah
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
- Laboratory of Vaccine and Biomolecules, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gloanec N, Guyard-Nicodème M, Brunetti R, Quesne S, Keita A, Chemaly M, Dory D. Evaluation of Two Recombinant Protein-Based Vaccine Regimens against Campylobacter jejuni: Impact on Protection, Humoral Immune Responses and Gut Microbiota in Broilers. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:3779. [PMID: 38136816 PMCID: PMC10741133 DOI: 10.3390/ani13243779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter infections in humans are traced mainly to poultry products. While vaccinating poultry against Campylobacter could reduce the incidence of human infections, no vaccine is yet available on the market. In our previous study using a plasmid DNA prime/recombinant protein boost vaccine regimen, vaccine candidate YP437 induced partial protective immune responses against Campylobacter in broilers. In order to optimise vaccine efficacy, the vaccination protocol was modified using a protein prime/protein boost regimen with a different number of boosters. Broilers were given two or four intramuscular protein vaccinations (with the YP437 vaccine antigen) before an oral challenge by C. jejuni during a 42-day trial. The caecal Campylobacter load, specific systemic and mucosal antibody levels and caecal microbiota in the vaccinated groups were compared with their respective placebo groups and a challenge group (Campylobacter infection only). Specific humoral immune responses were induced, but no reduction in Campylobacter caecal load was observed in any of the groups (p > 0.05). Microbiota beta diversity analysis revealed that the bacterial composition of the groups was significantly different (p ≤ 0.001), but that vaccination did not alter the relative abundance of the main bacterial taxa residing in the caeca. The candidate vaccine was ineffective in inducing a humoral immune response and therefore did not provide protection against Campylobacter spp. infection in broilers. More studies are required to find new candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie Gloanec
- GVB—Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (N.G.); (R.B.); (D.D.)
- HQPAP—Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (S.Q.); (M.C.)
- Life Environmental Sciences Department, University of Rennes 1, 37500 Rennes, France
| | - Muriel Guyard-Nicodème
- HQPAP—Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (S.Q.); (M.C.)
| | - Raphaël Brunetti
- GVB—Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (N.G.); (R.B.); (D.D.)
| | - Ségolène Quesne
- HQPAP—Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (S.Q.); (M.C.)
| | - Alassane Keita
- SELEAC—Avian Breeding and Experimental Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France;
| | - Marianne Chemaly
- HQPAP—Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (S.Q.); (M.C.)
| | - Daniel Dory
- GVB—Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France; (N.G.); (R.B.); (D.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gloanec N, Guyard-Nicodème M, Brunetti R, Quesne S, Keita A, Chemaly M, Dory D. Plasmid DNA Prime/Protein Boost Vaccination against Campylobacter jejuni in Broilers: Impact of Vaccine Candidates on Immune Responses and Gut Microbiota. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15051397. [PMID: 37242639 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15051397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Campylobacter infections, traced to poultry products, are major bacterial foodborne zoonoses, and vaccination is a potential solution to reduce these infections. In a previous experimental trial using a plasmid DNA prime/recombinant protein boost vaccine regimen, two vaccine candidates (YP437 and YP9817) induced a partially protective immune response against Campylobacter in broilers, and an impact of the protein batch on vaccine efficacy was suspected. This new study was designed to evaluate different batches of the previously studied recombinant proteins (called YP437A, YP437P and YP9817P) and to enhance the immune responses and gut microbiota studies after a C. jejuni challenge. Throughout the 42-day trial in broilers, caecal Campylobacter load, specific antibodies in serum and bile, the relative expression of cytokines and β-defensins, and caecal microbiota were assessed. Despite there being no significant reduction in Campylobacter in the caecum of vaccinated groups, specific antibodies were detected in serum and bile, particularly for YP437A and YP9817P, whereas the production of cytokines and β-defensins was not significant. The immune responses differed according to the batch. A slight change in microbiota was demonstrated in response to vaccination against Campylobacter. The vaccine composition and/or regimen must be further optimised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noémie Gloanec
- GVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
- HQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
- UFR of Life Sciences Environment, University of Rennes 1, 35700 Rennes, France
| | - Muriel Guyard-Nicodème
- HQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| | - Raphaël Brunetti
- GVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| | - Ségolène Quesne
- HQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| | - Alassane Keita
- SELEAC-Avian Breeding and Experimental Department, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| | - Marianne Chemaly
- HQPAP-Unit of Hygiene and Quality of Poultry and Pork Products, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| | - Daniel Dory
- GVB-Viral Genetics and Biosafety Unit, French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES), 22440 Ploufragan, France
| |
Collapse
|