Delay in initiation of clozapine: a retrospective study from a tertiary care hospital in North India

An experience of using Clozapine in elderly patients with mental disorders

BACKGROUND

There is little information on using clozapine in elderly patients with mental disorders from India.

AIM

To evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical profile of elderly (age ≥ 60 years) patients started on clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

The clozapine registry in the department was screened to identify elderly patients who were started on clozapine. Treatment records of these patients were reviewed to extract sociodemographic and clinical details.

RESULTS

Out of the available information of 1058 patients in the registry, 42 (3.96 %) were elderly (≥ 60 years) patients. About two-thirds of the patients had treatment resistance, i.e., their psychotic illness had not responded to two adequate trials of antipsychotics, and the second most common indication for starting clozapine was tardive dystonia or tardive dyskinesia (23.8 %). The mean dose of clozapine was 135.89 (SD: 109.6; Range: 37.5-500; median: 87.5) mg/day. The mean duration of clozapine use at the time of data extraction for the study sample was 3.55 (SD: 2.15; Range 0.3-9; median: 3) years. At the last follow-up, about three-fourths of patients were experiencing at least one side effect, with constipation being the most common side effect, followed by sedation, weight gain, and hypersalivation. In only four patients, clozapine was stopped during the follow-up. In terms of effectiveness, majority of the patients were rated as much improved or very much improved on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement subscale.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine can be safely used in elderly patients with mental disorders. Hence, clozapine should not be withheld in elderly patients with mental disorders whenever indicated.

Patient and caregivers perspective about clozapine: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is a gold standard treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. However, the patients' and caregivers' perception and their experience with clozapine has remained much less explored.

AIM

To review the available literature on the patients' and caregivers' attitudes, perceptions, and experiences with clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

27 original research and review articles published in PubMed-indexed journals till March 2023 in the English language, exploring the patient and/or caregiver/family member's experience with using clozapine, were included.

RESULTS

30-80 %of patients and 92-100 % of caregivers were found to have a positive attitude towards clozapine in terms of its impact on psychopathology, cognitive and social functioning of the patient, and caregiving needs. Most patients and caregivers also found that the positive effects of clozapine outweighed the side effects and distress related to repeated blood testing. However, a lack of satisfaction was noted among both patients and caregivers regarding the knowledge provided to them regarding clozapine, especially regarding its common adverse effects. Discontinuation of clozapine was found to be more commonly done by the patients' accord rather than clinicians, and the perceived side effects like hypersalivation and excessive sedation emerge as important factors that lead to discontinuation rather than the need for repeated blood testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients and their caregivers share a positive attitude towards clozapine and perceive it to be an effective and beneficial drug, but more effort needs to be directed by the clinical teams to educate the users of clozapine regarding its complete side effect profile and provide continuous guidance about dealing with the emerging side effects throughout treatment.

Experience with and attitude toward clozapine use among patients receiving clozapine on long term and their caregivers

Background

Despite clozapine being the gold standard for treating patients suffering from treatment-resistant schizophrenia, the experience and attitude of patients receiving clozapine for a long duration and their caregivers have not been evaluated, especially in India and other low-middle-income countries. Also, no standardized scale has been validated for such assessment.

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the perception regarding clozapine among patients and their caregivers. We also attempted to evaluate the factor structure of the scale for such assessment.

Methods

A total of 172 consenting patients who have been receiving clozapine for ≥1 year and their caregivers were evaluated on self-designed questionnaires (patient and caregiver versions containing 44 and 47 items, respectively) to assess various aspects of their experiences about clozapine use.

Results

A majority (70-80%) of patients and caregivers reported improvement in psychotic symptoms, mood symptoms, and overall functioning with starting of clozapine. However, about 40% of the patients reported cognitive side effects, and 20-25% reported disabling side effects like lethargy, forgetfulness and decreased attention, and distress related to blood testing after starting of clozapine. Factor analysis of the questionnaires yielded five- and seven-factor models for the experience and attitude of the patients and the caregivers, respectively. The positive experiences were associated clinical and functional improvement, lower disability, and improvement in functioning as well as the self-reported perceived improvement by the patient and caregiver.

Conclusion

This study suggests that patients tend to have an overall positive experience and attitude about using clozapine. The caregivers also report the beneficial effect on the caregiving. A good level of agreement was seen between the experience of patients, caregivers, and clinician-rated improvement in the psychopathology and functioning.

Long-term outcomes of delayed clozapine initiation in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic medication with proven efficacy against treatment-resistant schizophrenia. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the impact of a delay in clozapine initiation on long-term outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who initiated clozapine treatment between July 2009 and December 2018 were included in this study. According to the length of time from the diagnosis of schizophrenia to clozapine initiation, the patients were categorized into one of three groups: early (≤ 9 years), intermediate (10-19 years), and late (≥ 20 years) initiation. The endpoints were psychiatric rehospitalization and all-cause clozapine discontinuation within 3 years. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using the Fine and Gray method or the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The incidence rates of rehospitalization within three years, according to the cumulative incidence function, were 32.3% for early, 29.7% for intermediate, and 62.2% for late initiation, respectively. Late initiation had a significantly higher risk of psychiatric rehospitalization than early initiation (HR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.01- 8.55; P = 0.016 by the Gray's test). The risk of psychiatric rehospitalization was not significantly different between the early and intermediate initiation groups. The incidence rate of all-cause clozapine discontinuation within three years using the Kaplan-Meier method was 13.0% for early, 10.6% for intermediate, and 20.1% for late initiation. The risk of all-cause clozapine discontinuation was not significantly among the groups. The late initiation group had more patients discontinuing because of death due to physical diseases than the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that clozapine should be initiated promptly in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia to prevent psychiatric rehospitalization during long-term treatment. Further prospective studies with appropriate consideration of confounding factors and large sample sizes are needed to strengthen the evidence.

Electroconvulsive therapy or clozapine for adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: an explorative analysis on symptom dimensions

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to compare pre-intervention patient characteristics and post-intervention outcomes in a naturalistic sample of adolescent inpatients with treatment-resistant psychotic symptoms who received either electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) or clozapine.

METHODS

Data of adolescents with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder receiving ECT or clozapine were retrospectively collected from two tertiary-care psychiatry-teaching university hospitals. Subscale scores of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) factors were calculated according to the five-factor solution. Baseline demographics, illness characteristics, and post-intervention outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between patients receiving ECT (n = 13) and clozapine (n = 66) in terms of age, sex, and the duration of hospital stay. The ECT group more commonly had higher overall illness and aggression severity. Smoking was less frequent in the clozapine group. Baseline resistance/excitement symptom severity was significantly higher in the ECT group, while positive, negative, affect, disorganisation, and total symptom scores were not. Both interventions provided a significant reduction in PANSS scores with large effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

Both ECT and clozapine yielded high effectiveness rates in adolescents with treatment-resistant schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. Youth receiving ECT were generally more activated than those who received clozapine.

Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis and delay of clozapine treatment in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia

Both the underutilization of clozapine and treatment resistance of patients to clozapine are serious problems worldwide. Identifying clinical markers predicting response to clozapine would help clinicians more effectively utilize clozapine treatment. The present study retrospectively assessed dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP) in addition to other measures such as age at disease onset and delay of clozapine introduction for a total of 47 treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) patients. The response to clozapine was judged with CGI-C at 1 and 2 years from clozapine introduction. Results revealed that the DSP group tended to have a longer delay between designation of TRS and introduction of clozapine and continued to have slightly more severe psychopathology after treatment with clozapine, showing only slight improvement. The logistic regression analysis showed that the age at disease onset was the only significant indicator, predicting responsiveness to clozapine: patients with an onset age <20 years had a significantly better response to clozapine than patients with an onset age ≥20 years. The present study suggests that DSP might be related to a longer delay in clozapine introduction and the persistence of refractory symptoms despite clozapine treatment, whereas early age of disease onset might be related to a better response to clozapine.

Clozapine research from India: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although clozapine is much researched in western literature, a review on Indian research on clozapine published in 2010 reported limited data and need for further research in this area.

AIM

We aimed to conduct a systematic review of research on clozapine from India from 2010 to mid-2022 and also compare the same with research output before 2010.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic various search engines, i.e., PUBMED, Medknow, Hinari and Google Scholar was done using the key words clozapine and India. Published articles with clozapine in the title and having an author from India, published during 2010 to July 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Initial Internet and hand searches yielded 280 articles, out of which 126 articles were excluded due to various reasons and 154 articles, were included for the review. This included 84 case reports, 49 original articles, 11 review articles and 10 letters to the editor as comments. We found an increase in the number of publications during the period of 2010-2022 compared to 1997-2009 in all types of publications. Over the years a significant proportion of the articles focused on various side effects of clozapine, factors associated with response and non-response to clozapine and evaluation of outcomes other than efficacy/effectiveness. However, all the studies were limited to a single centre with no multicentric studies on clozapine.

CONCLUSION

Over the last 12 years or so, there is increase in the number of publications on clozapine. However, there is lack of multicentric studies.

Investigating Predictors of Clozapine Response in Adolescents with Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder

Objectives: We aimed to determine the clinical predictors of clozapine response in patients with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS)/schizoaffective disorder and the effect of substance use disorder (SUD) on treatment outcomes. Methods: Medical records of patients with treatment-resistant EOS receiving clozapine were identified for data analysis dated between January 2015 and April 2020. Patients on clozapine were followed in an inpatient unit of a tertiary care mental health hospital. Using the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS), ≥30% reduction was defined as the response criteria after clozapine treatment. Results: Of 50 subjects (age: 16.3 ± 1.3 years, 36.0% female), 22 subjects (44.0%) met the defined response criteria. Clozapine responder (CLZ-R) and clozapine nonresponder (CLZ-NR) groups were similar regarding age at illness onset, sex, and duration of untreated psychosis. The CLZ-R group had higher baseline positive PANSS scores (24.8 ± 8.1 vs. 17.1 ± 6.6, p = 0.001, d = 1.0) and total PANSS scores (94.8 ± 17.2 vs. 80.1 ± 19.8, p = 0.008, d = 0.8) compared with the CLZ-NR counterparts. The duration of hospital stay was longer in the CLZ-NR group (122.3 ± 48.2 vs. 87.3 ± 36.2 days, p = 0.007). Among 32 male patients, the presence of SUD (n = 9, 28.1%) was associated with a less reduction in total PANSS scores (F = 7.5, p = 0.010) and higher levels of positive symptoms at the end of the treatment (12.8 ± 4.1 vs. 18.8 ± 7.4, p = 0.006, d = 1.0). Synthetic cannabinoids were the most common substance type used among males with treatment-refractory EOS (25.0%). Conclusions: Our results did not support the role of sociodemographic variables in clozapine response. Positive symptoms and SUD yielded a prognostic value in patients receiving clozapine.

Attitude towards and experience with clozapine of patients and their caregivers after three months of starting of clozapine

AIM

To evaluate the patients' perceptions of clozapine and that of their family caregivers about the positive and negative effects of clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

52 patients and their family caregivers were assessed for their perception of the positive and negative effects of clozapine by using a self-designed questionnaire.

RESULTS

About half (53.8%) of the patients were not distressed of frequent blood testing. At least two-thirds of the patients acknowledged a reduction in psychopathology, achieving clinical stability, improvement in the behavior of others towards them, improvement in their behavior towards others, improvement in regularity in medication intake, agreed that their clinical state will worsen if clozapine is stopped, and reported overall satisfaction/happiness with the intake of clozapine. In general, caregivers also reported similar perceptions. In terms of caregiver outcomes, about two-third to three-fourth of the caregivers reported a reduction in caregiving needs, personal caregiver distress and tension, caregiver burden and time spent in caregiving. About half of the caregivers reported a reduction in the cost of treatment, since the starting of clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

To conclude, the present study suggests that a significant proportion of patients receiving clozapine for three months and their relatives report positive perception and experience with the molecule.

Does the Starting of Clozapine Influence Coprescription of Other Medications?: A Study From India

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

Little is understood about the prescription load before and after the starting of clozapine. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the medication load of patients receiving clozapine, just before starting clozapine and after being on clozapine for at least 1 year. Additionally, the impact of clozapine on severity of illness was evaluated.

METHODS/PROCEDURES

Two hundred seventy-seven outpatients receiving clozapine were prospectively evaluated for their prescription after at least 1 year of starting clozapine. Additionally, these patients were assessed on the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale to evaluate the overall clinical benefit with clozapine.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

They had been receiving clozapine for 6.55 (SD, 4.8; range, 1-24; median, 5) years at the time of assessment. At the start of clozapine, more than one third of the patients were receiving 2 antipsychotics. A small proportion was receiving other psychotropics, such as antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and benzodiazepines. After being on clozapine for 1 year, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients receiving two antipsychotic medications (P < 0.001), number of patients receiving antidepressants (if amitriptyline was left out), benzodiazepine (P < 0.001), and anticholinergic medications (P < 0.001). Further, there was a reduction in the mean chlorpromazine equivalent of antipsychotics (P < 0.001) and the total number of medications received by the patients (P < 0.001). However, there was an increase in the prescription rates of antihypertensive drugs (P = 0.03), anti-diabetic medications (P < 0.01), and anti-dyslipidemic medications. At follow-up, there was a significant improvement in symptoms as assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that long-term use of clozapine is associated with substantial improvement in symptoms with a reduction in the medication load.

Safety of Use of Clozapine in Patients With Schizophrenia With Comorbid Diabetes Mellitus

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

To evaluate the outcome of diabetes mellitus among patients of schizophrenia who had diabetes mellitus before starting clozapine.

METHODS

Clozapine data were screened to detect the patients who had diabetes mellitus before starting clozapine. Those who had diabetes mellitus before starting clozapine were taken up for the study.

RESULTS

Of the 468 records screened, 28 patients (5.6%) had diabetes mellitus before starting clozapine. Among the 28 patients, 15 (53.6%) were females, and 13 (46.4%) were male. In three-fourths (75%) of the patients, clozapine was started while these patients were admitted to the inpatient unit. Twenty-six patients had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 2 patients had type 1 diabetes mellitus at the time of starting clozapine. Most patients also had deranged blood glucose levels at the time of starting clozapine and required close monitoring of blood glucose levels and also starting/continuation of antidiabetic medications. None of the patients developed diabetic ketoacidosis during the initial part of the treatment. At the mean follow-up duration of 16 months, most patients were on regular follow-up for more than 1 year, and their blood glucose levels were maintained close to the reference range. Majority of these patients showed good response to clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that presence of diabetes mellitus should not stop the clinicians to use clozapine among patients with schizophrenia. However, close monitoring of blood glucose levels must be done.

Do Indian patients with schizophrenia need half the recommended clozapine dose to achieve therapeutic serum level? An exploratory study

Inter-racial differences in serum clozapine have received less scientific importance, as there are fewer studies on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from Asia. We measured the serum clozapine levels in 142 patients with schizophrenia and related disorders at a tertiary care psychiatric institute in India. The clozapine concentration per milligram (mg) of oral clozapine dose (C/D ratio) was calculated, and the C/D ratio was used to estimate oral clozapine dose needed to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level (350 ng/ml). This study examined Indian patients only and compared the results with weighted mean serum clozapine and its correlates in Caucasian population, based on published scientific literature. The median C/D ratio in our sample was 2.5 (n = 142), and the clozapine dose needed to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level was 140 mg/d. The median C/D ratio of our subjects was nearly two and a half times higher than the weighted mean C/D ratio of Caucasians (2.5 v/s 1.07) reported elsewhere. After excluding the significant pharmacokinetic interactions and stratifying according to gender and smoking status, the estimated clozapine dose to achieve therapeutic serum level in male smokers (n = 9) and female non-smokers (n = 38) were 238 mg/d (C/D ratio; 1.47) and 120 mg/d (C/D ratio:2.93) respectively. On comparing, male smokers (600 mg/d versus 238 mg/d) and female non-smokers (300 mg/d versus 120 mg/d) in our study needed about 40% of the recommended clozapine dose for Caucasians to achieve therapeutic serum clozapine level. The pharmacogenetic correlates of lesser clozapine dose requirement in the Indian population require further research.

Delaying clozapine: how long is too long?

Background

Although clozapine is the most effective drug for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, its use remains restricted in clinical practice in India. The delay in initiating treatment with clozapine and its impact on disease outcome needs evaluation.

Aim

To identify the implications of delaying clozapine initiation in clinical outcomes among people with treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Methods

Subjects with treatment-resistant schizophrenia, stabilised on clozapine monotherapy, were recruited from the outpatient clinic of a general hospital psychiatry unit offering tertiary care services in Thrissur district, Kerala, India. A retrospective cohort design was employed, and information on duration of illness, total duration of treatment and duration of treatment with clozapine was collected. Present symptom status was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Factors associated with higher symptom scores were analysed using an independent sample t test, Spearman correlation and multiple linear regression.

Results

Forty subjects stabilised on long-term clozapine therapy formed the study sample. The mean dose of clozapine used in the study population was 200 mg. The mean duration of antipsychotic treatment before starting clozapine was 89.3 months (7.4 years). The duration of treatment before starting clozapine was found to have a significant positive association with the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score (correlation coefficient 0.40; p=0.01) and negative symptom score (correlation coefficient 0.33; p=0.04). The multiple regression analysis adjusting for covariates showed that the duration of treatment before starting clozapine was an independent factor associated with a higher negative symptom score in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (slope β=0.05; p=0.02; R²=0.27).

Conclusion

Poor treatment outcomes in treatment-resistant schizophrenia could be secondary to a delay in initiating clozapine therapy.

Delegating Clozapine Monitoring to Advanced Nurse Practitioners: An Exploratory, Randomized Study to Assess the Effect on Prescription and Its Safety

To test whether: (1) psychiatrists will prescribe clozapine more often if they can delegate the monitoring tasks to an advanced nurse practitioner (ANP), (2) clozapine monitoring by an ANP is at least as safe as monitoring by a psychiatrist. Patients from 23 Dutch outpatient teams were assessed for an indication for clozapine. ANPs affiliated to these teams were randomized to Condition A: clozapine monitoring by an ANP, or Condition B: monitoring by the psychiatrist. The safety of monitoring was evaluated by determining whether the weekly neutrophil measurements were performed. Staff and patients were blinded regarding the first hypothesis. Of the 173 patients with an indication for clozapine at baseline, only seven in Condition A and four in Condition B were prescribed clozapine (Odds Ratio = 2.24, 95% CI 0.61–8.21; p = 0.225). These low figures affected the power of this study. When we considered all patients who started with clozapine over the 15-month period (N = 49), the Odds Ratio was 1.90 (95% CI 0.93–3.87; p = 0.078). With regard to the safety of the monitoring of the latter group of patients, 71.2% of the required neutrophil measurements were performed in condition A and 67.3% in condition B (OR = 0.98; CI = 0.16–3.04; p = 0.98). Identifying patients with an indication for clozapine does not automatically lead to improved prescription rates, even when an ANP is available for the monitoring. Clozapine-monitoring performed by an ANP seemed as safe as that by a psychiatrist.

Haematological side effects associated with clozapine: A retrospective study from India

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of clozapine induced haematological side effects among patients receiving clozapine.

METHODS

Data of 333 patients who were on clozapine for a mean duration of 52.96 (45.18) months were reviewed for haematological abnormalities.

RESULTS

Most of the patients (n = 320; 96.1 %) were diagnosed with psychotic disorders, mainly schizophrenia. These patients were receiving clozapine in the dose range of 12.5 mg-600 mg/day, with a mean dose of 212.08 (102.43) mg/day at the time of review of their records. About one-tenth (N = 33; 9.9 %) of patients developed eosinophilia (absolute eosinophil count >600), and 8.2 % (N = 27) experienced thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000 cmm³) and 7 patients developed anaemia (haemoglobin level <10 gm%). Only 2 (0.6%) patients developed neutropenia. Mean dose (mg/day) at which haematological side-effects occurred were as follows: 159.85 (87.65) mg/day for eosinophilia; 193.98 (148.93) mg/day for thrombocytopenia; 78.57 (22.49) mg/day for anaemia. In a small proportion of patients, clozapine was discontinued due to the haematological abnormalities and in other patients these abnormalities normalized on its own in subsequent follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Clozapine is associated eosinophilia and thrombocytopenia, which are often benign and in majority of the patients these normalize with time.

Addressing clozapine under-prescribing and barriers to initiation: a psychiatrist, advanced practice provider, and trainee survey

Clozapine use has declined, despite its superior antipsychotic efficacy in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Implications for clozapine underutilization include suboptimal treatment outcomes and increased hospitalizations. Many barriers preventing the use of clozapine have been described in the literature, including suboptimal knowledge and poor perceptions. The aim of this study was to assess psychiatry prescribers' perception and knowledge of clozapine. A survey was distributed to advanced practice providers, psychiatrists, and trainees (i.e. residents and fellows) at 10 medical centers within the US and Canada. The survey asked respondents about their perception of clozapine use and assessed their pharmacotherapeutic knowledge of clozapine. Two hundred eleven individual submitted completed surveys of a possible 1152; a response rate of 18.3%. There were no statistically significant differences between the advanced practice provider plus psychiatrist groups and the trainee group for most perception (eight of nine) and knowledge (eight of nine) questions. The knowledge questions with the lowest scores pertained to clozapine reinitiation and myocarditis. The majority of all respondents (144, 68.2%) felt that clozapine prescribing was a burden. Findings of this study support the need for continued clozapine education regardless of a prescriber's age/experience. Future studies to assess barriers to clozapine prescribing should extend beyond academic centers.

Delays and barriers to the commencement of clozapine in eligible people with a psychotic disorder: A literature review

AIM

While the majority of individuals with a first episode of psychosis (FEP) achieve symptomatic remission with the appropriate treatment, there is a small but significant proportion who do not achieve remission of symptoms despite adequate treatment with at least two antipsychotic medications (termed treatment resistance). Clozapine is indicated in individuals who fulfil the criteria for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, however, despite it being the most effective antipsychotic medication, there can be delays in the commencement of clozapine in eligible patients.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed to identify articles reporting either the time taken to commence clozapine (or delays) in eligible individuals or articles reporting barriers to the commencement of clozapine. The initial search generated 5588 articles and of these, 18 were eligible.

RESULTS

13 studies described delays in commencing clozapine and five studies reported on the barriers to the commencement of clozapine. The duration of delay from when an individual was deemed eligible for clozapine treatment to the time of clozapine commencement ranged from 19.3 weeks to 5.5 years. In addition, the duration of illness prior to clozapine initiation ranged from 1.1 to 9.7 years. It was found that some clinicians were more inclined to prescribe antipsychotic polypharmacy or doses higher than recommended than to prescribe clozapine.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays in commencing clozapine have been consistently demonstrated. Early intervention for psychosis services are the ideal settings to identify individuals with persistent positive psychotic symptoms and commence clozapine if indicated.

Barriers to using clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: systematic review

Aims and methodTo systematically review the literature on barriers to the use of clozapine and identify any interventions for optimizing clozapine use in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Journal databases were searched from 1972 to March 2018. The following search terms were used: treatment-resistant schizophrenia, clozapine, barriers, use, prescription rates, implementation, clozaril and prescribing practices. Following a review of the literature, 15 papers were included in the review. RESULTS: The major barriers that were identified included mandatory blood testing, fear of serious side-effects and lack of adherence by the patients, difficulty in identifying suitable patients, service fragmentation, and inadequate training in or exposure to using clozapine.Clinical implicationsIn view of consistent evidence across the studies on inadequate knowledge and skills as a significant barrier, we suggest that a certification requiring competence in initiating and managing side-effects of clozapine becomes a mandatory requirement in training programmes.Declarations of interestNone.

A Retrospective Multicenter Evaluation of Clozapine Use in Pediatric Patients Admitted for Acute Psychiatric Hospitalization

OBJECTIVES

Clozapine is the drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. While pediatric clozapine use is not contraindicated, the literature describing its clinical application is limited. The primary objective of this study was to assess the use of clozapine in a child and adolescent population by characterizing the documented safety and clinical benefits of the medication.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study at sites in the United States and Australia included children and adolescents admitted to a psychiatric unit who were administered at least one dose of clozapine. Information related to demographics, patient history, past treatments, clozapine, and adverse events was collected.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients from eight sites were included in this study. Patients were predominantly clozapine naive (76.8%), and most had a discharge diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder (61%) or bipolar disorder (25.6%). Four clozapine discontinuations occurred during hospitalization due to severe neutropenia, ileus, need for diagnostic clarification, and significant psychomotor retardation. The remainder (n = 78) were discharged on a mean clozapine dose of 218.1 ± 142.2 mg. Sedation (26.8%) and sialorrhea (17.1%) were the most common documented adverse events. The mean number of previously trialed antipsychotics before clozapine was 3.5 ± 1.4 (range 1-10). Improvement with clozapine was documented as significant (31.7%), moderate (32.9%), minimal (12.2%), no improvement (2.4%), and not described (20.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, 95% of pediatric patients admitted with or started on clozapine during an acute psychiatric hospitalization were discharged on the medication. The high incidence of adverse events should reinforce to clinicians the need for vigilant monitoring. Pediatric guidelines recommend clozapine for refractory schizophrenia but stress the critical need to ensure an accurate diagnosis. Limited data exist for the use of clozapine in pediatric patients with other diagnoses.

The impact of delay in clozapine initiation on treatment outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia: A systematic review

Approximately one-third of patients with schizophrenia have treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TR-SCZ), which is a condition characterized by suboptimal response to antipsychotics other than clozapine. Importantly, treatment with clozapine-the only antipsychotic with an indication for TR-SCZ-is often delayed, which could contribute to negative outcomes. Given that the specific impact of delay in clozapine initiation is not well understood, we aimed to conduct a systematic search of the Ovid Medline^® database to identify English language publications exploring the impact of delay in clozapine initiation on treatment outcomes in patients with TR-SCZ. Additionally, clinico-demographic factors associated with clozapine delay were examined. Our search identified four retrospective studies that showed an association between longer delay in clozapine initiation and poorer treatment outcomes, even after including covariates, such as age, sex, and duration of illness. In addition, we found six studies that showed an association between age and clozapine delay, but results with regard to other clinico-demographic variables were inconsistent. Overall, the available literature reveals a possible link between delay in clozapine use and poorer treatment outcomes in patients with TR-SCZ. However, given the relatively small number of studies on this clinically important topic, future research is warranted to draw more definitive conclusions.

The critical treatment window of clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia: Secondary analysis of an observational study

Previous studies have suggested that a delay in initiating clozapine is one of the predictors of outcomes in treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). However, whether there is a critical treatment window of clozapine in TRS and the duration of that window remain unclear. We conducted a secondary analysis of a previously published observational study using a retrospective chart review of 105 patients with TRS who were treated with clozapine. We included 90 patients who remained on clozapine for at least 3 months. The delay in initiating clozapine was an independent contributor to symptomatic improvement based on treatment with clozapine by multiple linear regression analysis. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (area under the curve: 0.78) confirmed 2.8 years was the best predictive cut-off value of delay in initiating clozapine for responses in patients treated with clozapine (sensitivity: 0.66, specificity: 0.84). In patients with a delay in initiating clozapine of ≤2.8 years and a delay in initiating clozapine of >2.8 years, the response rates were 81.6% and 30.8% (risk ratio=2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.80, 3.63), respectively. Clinicians should reduce the delay in initiating clozapine to less than 3 years to improve symptomatic outcomes in TRS and to prevent clozapine-resistant schizophrenia.

Effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia: A retrospective study

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) among patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Records of patients who had received ECT were reviewed to identify patients with TRS who were administered ECT in combination with clozapine. Socio-demographic, clinical data and ECT details were extracted. The most common diagnosis was of paranoid schizophrenia (49%) followed by undifferentiated schizophrenia (36%). A-fifth (22%) of the patients were judged to have poor response to clozapine. The mean number of ECTs given were 13.97 (SD-7.67) and mean clozapine dose was 287.5mgs/day (SD-100.1). About two-thirds (63%) of the patients showed >30% reduction in scores on different symptom-rating scales with combined use of clozapine and ECT. Among clozapine non-responders, approximately 69% responded to the combination. Post-ECT rise in blood pressure was the most common side effect (16.9%) followed by prolonged seizures (7%). Long-term follow-up data was available for 47 out of the 59 patients. More than two-third (N=34; 72%) followed-up for an average of 30 months (SD 32.3; range: 1-120), maintained well with continued clozapine treatment. To conclude, results of this study further endorse the effectiveness, safety and long-term benefits of the clozapine-ECT combination in TRS and clozapine-refractory schizophrenia.

Prescription practices and attitude of psychiatrists towards clozapine: A survey of psychiatrists from India

AIM

To assess the attitude of psychiatrists towards clozapine and also to evaluate the prescription practices of psychiatrists for clozapine.

METHODOLOGY

An email survey was sent to 3381 psychiatrists from India, of whom 548 (16.2%) responded.

RESULTS

Mean number of years in clinical practice was 12.59 (SD-10.1) for participating psychiatrists. Majority of the participants rated their knowledge about clozapine to be good (61.5%)/very good (34.5%). The primary indication for use of clozapine for almost all the participants was treatment resistance and most of the psychiatrists initiated clozapine either in the dose of 25mg OD (44.3%) or 12.5mg OD (37%). Half (51.8%) of the psychiatrists preferred to use clozapine as BD dosing schedule, and median doses required to stabilize the patients ranged from 137.5 to 400mg/day. Once the clozapine dose had been stabilized, about half (51%) of the psychiatrists advised blood monitoring at monthly intervals. Almost all psychiatrists rated effectiveness of clozapine to be better than other antipsychotics. In terms of tolerability, 45.3% of the psychiatrists rated it as 'same as other antipsychotics' and 15.9% rated it as better than other antipsychotics. Most common patient and therapist related factors associated with reluctance to start clozapine were history of poor medication compliance and need for monitoring, respectively. Upon reviewing the prescription of other psychiatrists, participating psychiatrists reported that in about 28.46% of patients clozapine was not prescribed though indicated.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey suggests that clozapine is underused in India, although psychiatrists have adequate knowledge about the drug but many psychiatrists have negative attitude towards clozapine.