Prevalence and associated factors of hypnotics dependence among Japanese outpatients with psychiatric disorders

Factors associated with hypnotics polypharmacy in the Japanese population

OBJECTIVE

Insomnia disorder is a global public health issue, commonly treated with hypnotics. However, long-term use of benzodiazepine derivatives (BZDs), especially polypharmacy with this kind of drug, carries risks for dependence and abuse. This study using large-scale medical insurance records investigated the causes of polypharmacy through the treatment of insomnia disorder.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study analyzed anonymized medical record data from July 2014 to March 2018 provided by a nationwide Japanese health insurance association covering 405,952 individuals. Outpatients prescribed at least one sleep medication were included. Demographic data, pharmacological classification of the drugs, and comorbidities were assessed using hierarchical logistic regression analysis to explore their associations with polypharmacy.

RESULTS

Of the 33,212 outpatients who were prescribed sleep medications, 32.5 % were prescribed multiple types. After adjusting for demographics and type of sleep medications as covariates, hypnotic polypharmacy was significantly associated with younger age, the presence of certain kinds of comorbidities, and using BZD anxiolytics before bedtime with the highest adjusted odds ratios (8.01-9.39) when referenced with BZD hypnotics. On the other hand, usage of orexin receptor antagonists, melatonin receptor agonists, and Z-drugs indicated lower odds ratios (0.74-0.87).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypnotic polypharmacy is relatively common in the Japanese general population. With the introduction of non-pharmacological therapy in mind, assessing patients' comorbidities and avoiding the use of benzodiazepines, especially BZD anxiolytics, before bedtime would be recommended to prevent polypharmacy.

Factors associated with the long-term use of benzodiazepine receptor agonists as hypnotics among patients with major depressive disorder and comorbid insomnia

BACKGROUND

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and comorbid insomnia are often co-prescribed benzodiazepines (BZDs) or Z-drugs as hypnotics with antidepressants to manage persistent insomnia. However, factors associated with their long-term use remain unclear among MDD patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 351 MDD patients who started antidepressants with co-prescribed hypnotics (BZDs/Z-drugs) and investigated the prevalence of and factors associated with their long-term use at 12 months. We conducted logistic regression analyses of their long-term use, and compared insomnia severities between the continued and discontinued groups of hypnotics in 32 patients whose insomnia severities had been longitudinally assessed.

RESULTS

66.1% of patients had continued hypnotics for 12 months. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the diazepam-equivalent dose of hypnotics at the start of the combined treatment (>5 mg), the presence of chronic insomnia prior to MDD, and hospitalization correlated with their long-term use (all p < 0.01). We also found the relationship between the insufficient amelioration of insomnia severities and their long-term use. However, confidence in these results is tempered by various factors, including the dependence on hypnotics, the patient's attitude about hypnotic treatment, and the exclusion of subjects treated with other drugs such as sedative antidepressants or antipsychotics.

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical indicators may facilitate the selection of treatment strategies for MDD with comorbid insomnia. To avoid the long-term use of hypnotics, their dose at the start of the combined treatment needs to be adequate (≤5 mg) and alternative treatments to BZDs/Z-drugs are required for refractory insomnia.

Orexin receptor antagonists in the treatment of insomnia associated with psychiatric disorders: a systematic review

Insomnia is highly comorbid in patients with psychiatric disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, and substance use disorders, and should be treated as an independent condition. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) have been investigated as a treatment for chronic insomnia. The objective of this systematic review was to examine evidence for two DORAs, lemborexant and suvorexant, as treatments for insomnia comorbid with a psychiatric disorder. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase from their inception until January and April 2023, and included studies examining suvorexant and lemborexant for treating insomnia comorbid with psychiatric disorders. We also manually searched clinical trial registries ( https://clinicaltrials.gov and https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr ). Randomized clinical trials and observational/cohort studies were included. We identified 18 studies from PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase and three studies from clinicaltrials.gov and UMIN. Of the 21 reports, four were completed/terminated randomized clinical trials, eight were ongoing clinical trials, and nine were observational studies. We identified evidence for switching from benzodiazepine receptor agonists to a DORA, or using a DORA as add-on therapy and, therefore, discuss this topic as well. Two studies examined switching to or adding on a DORA in patients being treated with a benzodiazepine receptor agonist. DORAs may be as effective and safe for treating psychiatric comorbid insomnia (for most psychiatric conditions) as they are for treating primary insomnia. However, the evidence is limited to a few small studies. Further investigation of DORAs for the treatment of comorbid insomnia in those with coexisting psychiatric conditions is warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Transitioning to Lemborexant from Z-drug, Suvorexant, and Ramelteon in Japanese Insomnia Patients: An Open-label, Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

For patients with chronic insomnia, conventional therapy may not always provide satisfactory efficacy and safety. Thus, switching to an alternative therapeutic agent can be explored. However, there is a lack of prospective studies evaluating the effectiveness of such changes. This prospective, non-randomized, open-label, interventional, multicenter study assessed whether Japanese patients with chronic insomnia dissatisfied with treatment could transition directly to lemborexant (LEM) from four cohorts-non-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone) monotherapy, dual orexin receptor antagonist (suvorexant) monotherapy, suvorexant + benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs), and melatonin receptor agonist (ramelteon) combination. We evaluated whether transitioning to LEM improved patient satisfaction based on efficacy and safety.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the proportion of successful transitions to LEM at 2 weeks (titration phase end), defined as the proportion of patients on LEM by the end of the 2-week titration phase who were willing to continue on LEM during the maintenance phase (Weeks 2-14). Patient satisfaction and safety (the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAEs]) were assessed at 14 weeks (end of titration and maintenance phases).

RESULTS

Among the 90 patients enrolled, 95.6% (95% confidence interval: 89.0-98.8%) successfully transitioned to LEM at 2 weeks. The proportions of patients who successfully continued on LEM were 97.8% and 82.2% at the end of the titration and maintenance phases (Weeks 2 and 14), respectively. The overall incidence of TEAEs was 47.8%; no serious TEAEs occurred. In all cohorts, the proportions of patients with positive responses were higher than the proportions with negative responses on the three scales of the Patient Global Impression-Insomnia version. During the maintenance phase, Insomnia Severity Index scores generally improved at Weeks 2, 6, and 14 of LEM transition.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct transition to LEM may be a valid treatment option for patients with insomnia who are dissatisfied with current treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT04742699.

The effect of lemborexant on insomnia in patients with psychiatric disorders: Detailed evaluation using the Athens Insomnia Scale

Aim

Chronic insomnia disorder is common and associated with reduced quality of life. Benzodiazepine hypnotics are commonly prescribed for insomnia, but have potential side effects such as concentration impairment, somnolence, and dependence. Lemborexant (LEM) is an orexin receptor antagonist considered to have fewer side effects than benzodiazepine hypnotics. This study evaluated the effect of LEM on sleep in detail and examined whether benzodiazepine hypnotics can be gradually tapered by adding LEM.

Methods

We retrospectively examined the effectiveness of LEM in 28 outpatients with insomnia. Insomnia symptoms were assessed using the Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) before and after LEM administration. We also attempted to taper benzodiazepine hypnotics and assessed benzodiazepine dose using diazepam equivalents for some patients taking benzodiazepine hypnotics. Wilcoxon's signed-rank test was used for statistical analysis.

Results

The mean AIS score was significantly improved after LEM treatment (8.7 ± 5.2 vs. 3.8 ± 3.3; P < 0.01). Among the AIS subitems, significant improvement was observed for six items: sleep induction, awakenings during the night, sleep quality, well-being, functioning capacity, and sleepiness during the day. The mean benzodiazepine dose was significantly lower after LEM treatment (4.6 ± 5.0 mg vs. 2.1 ± 3.3 mg; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

This study indicated the potential of LEM for improving insomnia and reducing benzodiazepine dose.

Treatment strategy for insomnia disorder: Japanese expert consensus

Purpose

There is a lack of evidence regarding answers for clinical questions about treating insomnia disorder. This study aimed to answer the following clinical questions: (1) how to use each hypnotic and non-pharmacological treatment differently depending on clinical situations and (2) how to reduce or stop benzodiazepine hypnotics using alternative pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.

Methods

Experts were asked to evaluate treatment choices based on 10 clinical questions about insomnia disorder using a nine-point Likert scale (1 = "disagree" to 9 = "agree"). The responses of 196 experts were collected, and the answers were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line recommendations.

Results

The primary pharmacological treatment, lemborexant (7.3 ± 2.0), was categorized as a first-line recommendation for sleep initiation insomnia, and lemborexant (7.3 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.8 ± 1.8) were categorized as the first-line recommendations for sleep maintenance insomnia. Regarding non-pharmacological treatments for primary treatment, sleep hygiene education was categorized as the first-line recommendation for both sleep initiation (8.4 ± 1.1) and maintenance insomnia (8.1 ± 1.5), while multicomponent cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia was categorized as the second-line treatment for both sleep initiation (5.6 ± 2.3) and maintenance insomnia (5.7 ± 2.4). When reducing or discontinuing benzodiazepine hypnotics by switching to other medications, lemborexant (7.5 ± 1.8) and suvorexant (6.9 ± 1.9) were categorized as first-line recommendations.

Conclusion

Expert consensus indicates that orexin receptor antagonists and sleep hygiene education are recommended as first-line treatments in most clinical situations to treat insomnia disorder.

Development and validation of the Benzodiazepine Hypnotics Withdrawal Symptom Scale (BHWSS) based on item response theory

This study aimed to refine and validate the Benzodiazepine Hypnotics Withdrawal Symptom Scale (BHWSS). The 12-item prototype version of the BHWSS was administered to a sample of 346 patients with chronic insomnia (161 males and 185 females, mean age: 52.8 ± 16.6 years) who had been taking hypnotics (benzodiazepines [BZDs] or BZD receptor agonists) for at least 3 months. The item information curve indicated that two of the 12 BHWSS items should be excluded. As a result of analyzing the 10-item version of the BHWSS (revised-BHWSS), the contribution rate in the case of the factor 1 was 0.49, Cronbach's α was 0.90, and the reliability coefficient ω was 0.91. An analysis of the item information curve for the revised-BHWSS indicated that the information amount per item increased from 3.90 for the original 12-item BHWSS to 4.37 for the 10-item revised-BHWSS. The receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that 6.5 points on the revised-BHWSS was the most appropriate cutoff for estimating moderate or severe withdrawal symptoms using the Benzodiazepine Dependence Self-Report Questionnaire as a reference. These results suggest that the 10-item revised-BHWSS has sufficient reliability and validity for evaluating the severity of withdrawal symptoms after discontinuing BZDs.

Prevalence of and factors associated with acute withdrawal symptoms after 24 weeks of eszopiclone treatment in patients with chronic insomnia: a prospective, interventional study

BACKGROUND

Although long-term use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZDs) has been associated with an increased risk of dependence, the incidence, details of clinical manifestations, and triggering factors of withdrawal symptoms associated with long-term BZD use at common clinical doses remain unclear.

METHODS

In a multicenter, open-label study of 123 Japanese patients with insomnia, patients were given a common clinical dose of eszopiclone (2 mg) for 24 weeks, and then treatment was abruptly discontinued. Withdrawal symptoms were evaluated using the Benzodiazepine Hypnotics Withdrawal Symptom Scale (BHWSS). The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was used to rate insomnia severity during treatment and 2 weeks after discontinuation. Dependence and poor compliance during treatment without strict medication controls were evaluated with the Benzodiazepine Dependence Self Report Questionnaire short version (Bendep-SRQ SV) subscale sum scores for problematic use, preoccupation, and lack of compliance. Associations between the presence of clinically relevant withdrawal symptoms (BHWSS≥7) and demographic measures, ISI scores at Week 24, and Bendep-SRQ SV subscale sum scores were evaluated by multivariable stepwise logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients completed treatment and 2 weeks of withdrawal; eight (10.5%) had clinically relevant withdrawal symptoms. On multiple logistic regression analysis, Bendep-SRQ SV subscale sum scores were correlated with withdrawal symptoms (odds ratio, 1.650; 95% confidence interval, 1.105-2.464; p = 0.014). Exacerbation of post-discontinuation insomnia was not significantly different between patients who showed clinically relevant withdrawal symptoms and those who did not (p = 0.245).

CONCLUSIONS

Dependence and poor compliance may contribute to withdrawal symptoms with long-term BZD use. Providing guidance to ensure proper compliance is thought to be the best way to mitigate withdrawal symptoms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000024462 (18/10/2016).

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia on Subjective-Objective Sleep Discrepancy in Patients with Primary Insomnia: a Small-Scale Cohort Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is a first-line therapy for insomnia disorders. We assessed changes in discrepancies between subjective and objective sleep measures and correlations between discrepancy changes and clinical insomnia severity for CBT-I in patients with primary insomnia METHODS: Fifty-two outpatients (mean age, 60.3 years; 26 women) with primary insomnia were treated by individual CBT-I (50 min, maximum six sessions, once every 1-2 weeks). One week before and after CBT-I, patients recorded a sleep log and wore an actigraphy device. Subjective and objective time in bed (TIB), total sleep time (TST), sleep-onset latency (SOL), wake time after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) were evaluated by averaging 1-week records. Relative values of sleep discrepancy in TIB, TST, SOL, WASO, and SE were calculated for estimating effects of CBT-I. The therapeutic effects were also evaluated using psychological scales before and after CBT-I.

RESULTS

Subjective and objective discrepancies in sleep measures decreased by 36, 25, and 37 min in TST, SOL, and WASO, respectively, and 7% in SE (all P < 0.001) after CBT-I. Seven patients transitioned from underestimating SE before CBT-I to overestimating SE after CBT-I. Although CBT-I improved relative values of discrepancy in WASO and SE, alongside ISI, the improvement in insomnia severity only correlated with SOL discrepancy.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT-I may reduce the discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep measures in patients with primary insomnia. However, a greater therapeutic effect of CBT-I was observed in reducing the ISI, which was slightly influenced by improvements in sleep discrepancies.

Long-term use of hypnotics: Analysis of trends and risk factors

OBJECTIVE

Patients with chronic insomnia are prone to long-term use of hypnotics. Reported risk factors include aging, female sex, and comorbid psychiatric disorders. However, most previous studies have been cross-sectional cohort studies.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using medical service payment data for 330,000 people to determine the duration of prescription of hypnotics and the risk factors for long-term use. We followed up 3981 patients (2382 M, 1599 F, age 40.3 ± 12.4 years) who were prescribed hypnotics for the first time between April 2005 and March 2008.

RESULTS

Of these 3981 patients, 59.6% were prescribed hypnotics for only 1 month, 11.3% were prescribed hypnotics for 2 consecutive months, and 10.1% of patients continued receiving prescriptions for the entire 12-month observation period. In multiple logistic time-dependent Cox analyses, use of antidepressants, mean dose of hypnotics, and advanced age were significantly associated with long-term use of hypnotics (p < 0.01). In an analysis of the association between long-term use of hypnotics and prescribed dosage, high monthly dose, advanced age, and department of first visit were significantly associated with long-term use (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These clinical indicators may be effective for early identification of patients with insomnia who are at high risk of developing physical dependence on hypnotics.

Association between the high-dose use of benzodiazepines and rehospitalization in patients with schizophrenia: a 2-year naturalistic study

BACKGROUND

High-dose use of benzodiazepines (BZPs) reportedly causes adverse effects on cognitive function and quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. However, effects of BZPs on the clinical course of schizophrenia have not been clarified. This study was set out to investigate the association between BZPs and rehospitalization of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with schizophrenia who were discharged from Tokyo Medical University Hospital between January 2009 and February 2012 were eligible as subjects. One hundred and eight patients who continued treatment for >2 years after hospital discharge were included in this study. Clinical characteristics, doses of prescribed medication such as BZPs and antipsychotics, and Global Assessment of Functioning scores at discharge were investigated. The primary outcome was rehospitalization of patients for any reason.

RESULTS

In a total of 108 subjects with schizophrenia, 44 subjects (40.7%) experienced rehospitalization during the 2-year study period. A multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that low educational history (hazard ratio =2.43, P=0.032), younger onset age of schizophrenia (hazard ratio =2.10, P=0.021), and higher diazepam-equivalent dose (hazard ratio =6.53, P=0.011) were significantly associated with the time to rehospitalization after hospital discharge.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that high-dose use of BZPs at discharge in patients with schizophrenia might be associated with a shorter time to rehospitalization.