A meta-analytic review of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on general psychopathology symptoms of schizophrenia; immediate improvement followed by a return to baseline

Is it more effective for anhedonia and avolition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-invasive brain stimulation interventions for negative symptoms in schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are a promising tool for treating the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Growing evidence suggests that different dimensions of negative symptoms have partly distinct underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown inconsistent impacts of NIBS across dimensions.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of NIBS on general negative symptoms, and on specific domains, including blunted affect, alogia, asociality, anhedonia, and avolition.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, PsycINFO, OpenGrey, and Clinicaltrials.gov from the first date available to October, 2023.

RESULTS

Among 1049 studies, we identified eight high-quality RCTs. NIBS significantly affects general negative symptoms (SMD = -0.54, 95% CI [-0.88, -0.21]) and all five domains (SMD = -0.32 to -0.63). Among dimensions, better effects have been shown for improvement of avolition (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI [-0.81, -0.13]) and anhedonia (SMD = -0.63, 95% CI [-0.98, -0.28]). Subgroup analyses of studies that applied once daily stimulation or >10 sessions showed significantly reduced negative symptom severity.

CONCLUSION

NIBS exerts distinct effects across multiple dimensions of negative symptom, with treatment effects related to stimulation frequency and total sessions. These results need to be confirmed in dedicated studies.

The schizophrenia syndrome, circa 2024: What we know and how that informs its nature

With new data about different aspects of schizophrenia being continually generated, it becomes necessary to periodically revisit exactly what we know. Along with a need to review what we currently know about schizophrenia, there is an equal imperative to evaluate the construct itself. With these objectives, we undertook an iterative, multi-phase process involving fifty international experts in the field, with each step building on learnings from the prior one. This review assembles currently established findings about schizophrenia (construct, etiology, pathophysiology, clinical expression, treatment) and posits what they reveal about its nature. Schizophrenia is a heritable, complex, multi-dimensional syndrome with varying degrees of psychotic, negative, cognitive, mood, and motor manifestations. The illness exhibits a remitting and relapsing course, with varying degrees of recovery among affected individuals with most experiencing significant social and functional impairment. Genetic risk factors likely include thousands of common genetic variants that each have a small impact on an individual's risk and a plethora of rare gene variants that have a larger individual impact on risk. Their biological effects are concentrated in the brain and many of the same variants also increase the risk of other psychiatric disorders such as bipolar disorder, autism, and other neurodevelopmental conditions. Environmental risk factors include but are not limited to urban residence in childhood, migration, older paternal age at birth, cannabis use, childhood trauma, antenatal maternal infection, and perinatal hypoxia. Structural, functional, and neurochemical brain alterations implicate multiple regions and functional circuits. Dopamine D-2 receptor antagonists and partial agonists improve psychotic symptoms and reduce risk of relapse. Certain psychological and psychosocial interventions are beneficial. Early intervention can reduce treatment delay and improve outcomes. Schizophrenia is increasingly considered to be a heterogeneous syndrome and not a singular disease entity. There is no necessary or sufficient etiology, pathology, set of clinical features, or treatment that fully circumscribes this syndrome. A single, common pathophysiological pathway appears unlikely. The boundaries of schizophrenia remain fuzzy, suggesting the absence of a categorical fit and need to reconceptualize it as a broader, multi-dimensional and/or spectrum construct.

A pilot study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of lesion network guided transcranial electrical stimulation in outpatients with psychosis spectrum illness

BACKGROUND

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) may improve psychosis symptoms, but few investigations have targeted brain regions causally linked to psychosis symptoms. We implemented a novel montage targeting the extrastriate visual cortex (eVC) previously identified by lesion network mapping in the manifestation of visual hallucinations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if lesion network guided High Definition-tES (HD-tES) to the eVC is safe and efficacious in reducing symptoms related to psychosis.

METHODS

We conducted a single-blind crossover pilot study (NCT04870710) in patients with psychosis spectrum disorders. Participants first received HD-tDCS (direct current), followed by 4 weeks of wash out, then 2 Hz HD-tACS (alternating current). Participants received 5 days of daily (2×20 min) stimulation bilaterally to the eVC. Primary outcomes included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), biological motion task, and Event Related Potentials (ERP) from a steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) paradigm. Secondary outcomes included the Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale, Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), velocity discrimination and visual working memory task, and emotional ERP.

RESULTS

HD-tDCS improved PANSS general psychopathology in the short-term (d=0.47; pfdr=0.03), with long-term improvements in general psychopathology (d=0.62; pfdr=0.05) and GAF (d=-0.56; pfdr=0.04) with HD-tACS. HD-tDCS reduced SSVEP P1 (d=0.25; pfdr=0.005), which correlated with general psychopathology (β = 0.274, t = 3.59, p = 0.04). No significant differences in safety or tolerability measures were identified.

CONCLUSION

Lesion network guided HD-tES to the eVC is a safe, efficacious, and promising approach for reducing general psychopathology via changes in neuroplasticity. These results highlight the need for larger clinical trials implementing novel targeting methodologies for the treatments of psychosis.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Lesion Network Guided Transcranial Electrical Stimulation in Outpatients with Psychosis Spectrum Illness: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) may improve psychosis symptoms, but few investigations have targeted brain regions causally linked to psychosis symptoms. We implemented a novel montage targeting the extrastriate visual cortex (eVC) previously identified by lesion network mapping in the manifestation of visual hallucinations.

Objective

To determine if lesion network guided HD-tES to the eVC is safe and efficacious in reducing symptoms related to psychosis.

Design Setting and Participants

Single-center, nonrandomized, single-blind trial using a crossover design conducted in two 4-week phases beginning November 2020, and ending January 2022. Participants were adults 18-55 years of age with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective or psychotic bipolar disorder as confirmed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-V, without an antipsychotic medication change for at least 4 weeks. A total of 8 participants consented and 6 participants enrolled. Significance threshold set to <0.1 due to small sample size.

Interventions

6 Participants first received HD-tDCS (direct current), followed by 4 weeks of wash out, then 4 received 2Hz HD-tACS (alternating current). Participants received 5 consecutive days of daily (2 × 20min) stimulation applied bilaterally to the eVC.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, positive, negative, and general scores, biological motion task, and Event Related Potential (ERP) measures obtained from a steady state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) task across each 4-week phase. Secondary outcomes included the Montgomery-Asperg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), velocity discrimination task, visual working memory task, and emotional ERP across each 4-week phase.

Results

HD-tDCS improved general psychopathology in the short-term (d=0.47; p fdr =0.03), with long-term improvements in general psychopathology (d=0.62; p fdr =0.05) and GAF (d=-0.56; p fdr =0.04) with HD-tACS. HD-tDCS reduced SSVEP P1 (d=0.25; p fdr =0.005), which correlated with general psychopathology (β=0.274, t=3.59, p=0.04). No significant differences in safety or tolerability measures were identified.

Conclusions and Relevance

Lesion network guided HD-tES to the eVC is a safe, efficacious, and promising approach for reducing general psychopathology via changes in neuroplasticity. These results highlight the need for larger clinical trials implementing novel targeting methodologies for the treatments of psychosis.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04870710.

Key Points

Question: Is lesion network guided neurostimulation an efficacious, safe, and targeted approach for treating psychosis?Findings: In this single-center, nonrandomized, crossover, single-blind trial of 6 outpatients with psychosis, improvement in general psychopathology was seen in the short-term with HD-tDCS (high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation) and long-term with HD-tACS (alternating current) targeting the extrastriate visual cortex (eVC). HD-tDCS reduced early visual evoked responses which linked to general psychopathology improvements. Overall, both stimulations were well tolerated.Meaning: Study findings suggest that lesion network guided HD-tES to the eVC is a safe, efficacious, and promising approach for reducing general psychopathology via neuroplastic changes.

Transcranial direct current stimulation in the treatment of anxiety and depression in patients with oral cancer during perioperative period

This study retrospectively investigated the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of anxiety and depression in patients with oral cancer (OC) during the perioperative period (PPP). This retrospective study reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who underwent OC surgery and experienced anxiety and depression during PPP. The patients were divided into the treatment (n = 36) and control (n = 36) groups. The patients in the treatment group received tDCS, whereas those in the control group did not receive tDCS. The primary outcomes included the Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs). We analyzed the outcome data before and after treatment. After treatment, patients in the treatment group achieved greater relief in SAS (P < .01) and SDS (P < .01) scores than those in the control group. Regarding safety, no electronic medical records reported any AEs in this study. The results of this study showed that tDCS may help relieve depression and anxiety in patients with OC during PPP. However, high-quality prospective randomized controlled trials are required to confirm these findings.