Does interprofessional concussion management improve recovery in varsity athletes? A year to year effectiveness-implementation hybrid study

Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal of Role Definition and Responsibility Within the Concussion Management Team for Secondary Schools

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sports- and recreation-related concussions impact the cognitive function of secondary school students during the recovery process. They can cause symptoms such as headache, difficulty concentrating, and memory impairment, which pose a challenge for students during the return to learn (RTL) after injury. Concussion management teams (CMTs) assist the student in managing symptoms and develop an individualized RTL process; however, the ideal composition of professionals involved in the CMT has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to assess current research on CMTs in secondary schools. A search of the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted using the search terms "concussion management team" AND "school" OR "return to learn." RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included for review. The CMT structure was highly variable in all studies. Identified themes from the literature were confusion of role definition and function, and communication gaps among interdisciplinary team members. Half of the articles viewed the school nurse as the leader in coordinating the CMT and RTL process. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review suggests further consensus in this field is needed to clarify the school nurse's role and standardize the CMT structure.

Examining the interdisciplinary approach for treatment of persistent post-concussion symptoms in adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The objective of this review is to examine the evidence for the interdisciplinary approach in treatment of persistent post-concussion symptoms in adults.

METHODS

This systematic literature search was undertaken according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Five electronic databases were searched: CINAHL, Informit, ProQuest, PubMed and Scopus. After screening and quality assessment, the review included six studies published in English and peer-reviewed journals, between 2011 and 2021 to return contemporary evidence.

RESULTS

The results revealed that there was significant variation between measures used and the timing of the pre- and post-treatment assessment. The studies found an interdisciplinary approach to be beneficial, however, the challenges of inherent heterogeneity, lack of clarity for definitions and diagnosis, and mixed results were apparent. The interdisciplinary interventions applied in all identified studies were found to reduce post-concussion symptoms across the symptom subtypes: headache/migraine, vestibular, cognitive, ocular motor and anxiety/mood.

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated evidence for a reduction in persistent post-concussion symptoms following interdisciplinary intervention. This evidence will inform health services, clinicians, sports administrators and researchers with regard to concussion clinic and rehabilitation team design and service delivery.

Clinical recovery from concussion-return to school and sport: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To define the time frames, measures used and modifying factors influencing recovery, return to school/learn (RTL) and return to sport (RTS) after sport-related concussion (SRC).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

8 databases searched through 22 March 2022.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies with diagnosed/suspected SRC and interventions facilitating RTL/RTS or investigating the time and modifying factors for clinical recovery. Outcomes included days until symptom free, days until RTL and days until RTS. We documented study design, population, methodology and results. Risk of bias was evaluated using a modified Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network tool.

RESULTS

278 studies were included (80.6% cohort studies and 92.8% from North America). 7.9% were considered high-quality studies, while 23.0% were considered high risk of bias and inadmissible. The mean days until symptom free was 14.0 days (95% CI: 12.7, 15.4; I²=98.0%). The mean days until RTL was 8.3 (95% CI: 5.6, 11.1; I²=99.3%), with 93% of athletes having a full RTL by 10 days without new academic support. The mean days until RTS was 19.8 days (95% CI: 18.8, 20.7; I²=99.3%), with high heterogeneity between studies. Several measures define and track recovery, with initial symptom burden remaining the strongest predictor of longer days until RTS. Continuing to play and delayed access to healthcare providers were associated with longer recovery. Premorbid and postmorbid factors (eg, depression/anxiety, migraine history) may modify recovery time frames. Though point estimates suggest that female sex or younger age cohorts take longer to recover, the heterogeneity of study designs, outcomes and overlap in CIs with male sex or older age cohorts suggests that all have similar recovery patterns.

CONCLUSION

Most athletes have full RTL by 10 days but take twice as long for an RTS.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020159928.