1
|
Impact of maternal education on the outcome of newborns requiring surgery for congenital malformations. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214967. [PMID: 30958858 PMCID: PMC6453467 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Numerous studies established a link between socioeconomic status (SES) and several dimensions of general health. This study examines the association between maternal education as a widely used indicator of SES and outcome in newborns requiring surgical correction of congenital anomalies. Methods Ambispective data analysis of newborns with esophageal atresia (EA), intestinal atresia (IA), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), omphalocele (OC), gastroschisis (GS) undergoing surgery between 01/2008-11/2017 accessing the clinical databases Neodat and Viewpoint. Maternal education was determined according to the validated education classification CASMIN and stratified into “low” SES and “high” SES group. Endpoints were incidence of postoperative complications, length of mechanical ventilation, and readmission to NICU. Results Inclusion of 169 patients with EA (n = 32), IA (n = 24), CDH (n = 47), OC (n = 19), GS (n = 47). Women of low SES (n = 67, 40%) attended fewer prenatal screenings (total, 4.6 vs. 7.9, P<0.0001; EA, 3.7 vs. 7.1, P = 0.0002; IA, 3.5 vs. 9.4, P = 0.0006; OC, 2.5 vs. 8.8, P = 0.009; GS, 4.1 vs. 7.0, P = 0.002). Low SES was associated with higher incidence of patients born small for gestational age (37% vs. 20%, P = 0.019), with additional congenital malformations (37% vs. 15%, P = 0.001), being born in a peripheral center (7% vs. 0%, P = 0.008), and with higher incidence of 5´APGAR scores <7 (23% vs. 7%, P = 0.004). Moreover, low SES was associated with higher incidence of postoperative complications (total 70% vs. 32%, P<0.0001; EA, 60% vs. 23%, P = 0.04; IA, 67% vs. 11%, P = 0.008; CDH, 83% vs. 46%, P = 0.009; GS, 74% vs. 25%, P = 0.001), and higher readmission rate to NICU (IA, 33% vs. 0%, P = 0.043; GS, 32% vs. 4%, P = 0.007). Conclusions Low maternal education is associated with a reduced uptake of prenatal screenings, adverse neonatal outcomes, and higher incidence of postoperative complications in newborns with congenital anomalies. Primary prevention and specific support should be provided prenatally for families with low SES to avoid adverse outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Lou S, Carstensen K, Vogel I, Hvidman L, Nielsen CP, Lanther M, Petersen OB. Receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome by phone: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant couples. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e026825. [PMID: 30867204 PMCID: PMC6429881 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine how pregnant couples experience receiving a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS) by phone-a practice that has been routine care in the Central Denmark Region for years. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. SETTING Participants were recruited from hospitals in Central Denmark Region, Denmark. PARTICIPANTS Couples who had received a prenatal diagnosis of DS by phone and decided to terminate the pregnancy. They were recruited from the obstetric department where the termination was undertaken. During the study period (February 2016 to July 2017), 21 semistructured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted by an experienced anthropologist. Interviews were conducted 4-22 weeks after the diagnosis and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS A prearranged phone call was considered an acceptable practice. However, the first theme 'Expected but unexpected' shows how the call often came earlier than expected. Consequently, most women were not with their partner and were thus initially alone with their grief and furthermore responsible for informing their partner, which some considered difficult. The second theme 'Now what?' shows how during the phone calls, physicians were quick to enquire about the couples' agendas. As the majority had already decided to seek termination of pregnancy, the dialogue focused on related questions and arrangements. Only half of the couples received additional counselling. CONCLUSION A prearranged phone call was considered an acceptable and appropriate practice. However, some aspects of this practice (particularly related to the context of the call) showed to be less than optimal for the couples. To make sure that a diagnostic result is delivered in accordance with the couples' needs and requests, the context of the call could be addressed and agreed on in advance by physicians and couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Lou
- Central Denmark Region, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kathrine Carstensen
- Central Denmark Region, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lone Hvidman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Maja Lanther
- Central Denmark Region, DEFACTUM - Public Health and Quality Improvement, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Olav Bjørn Petersen
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus Universitetshospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lou S, Petersen OB, Jørgensen FS, Lund ICB, Kjaergaard S, Vogel I. National screening guidelines and developments in prenatal diagnoses and live births of Down syndrome in 1973-2016 in Denmark. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97:195-203. [PMID: 29194566 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Denmark was the first country in the world to implement a national, free-for-all offer of prenatal screening for Down syndrome to all pregnant women. It has a high uptake (>90%) compared to other countries. Thus, Denmark offers an interesting case for investigating the consequences of implementing comprehensive, national prenatal screening guidelines. The aim of this study was to describe the historical developments in invasive procedures, pre-/postnatal diagnoses of Down syndrome and Down syndrome live births in the period 1973-2016 in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data on invasive procedures, pre- and postnatal Down syndrome diagnoses were retrieved from the Danish Cytogenetic Central Registry. RESULTS From 1973 to 1993, screening based on maternal age and high-risk indications resulted in a constant increase in invasive procedures. After the introduction of the triple test in 1994, invasive procedures decreased for the first time in 20 years. Following the introduction of an offer of combined screening to all pregnant women in 2004, the number of invasive procedures decreased markedly, while there was a concurrent increase in prenatal diagnoses of Down syndrome. Additionally, the number of Down syndrome live births decreased suddenly and significantly, but subsequently stabilized at 23-35 annual live births. Of these, the majority were diagnosed postnatally. CONCLUSION Though prenatal screening technologies constantly improve, it was the introduction of and adherence to national guidelines that resulted in marked shifts in screening procedures and outcome in Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Lou
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,DEFACTUM - Public Health & Health Services Research, Central Denmark Region, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Olav B Petersen
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Finn S Jørgensen
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ida C B Lund
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Susanne Kjaergaard
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ida Vogel
- Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Posthumus AG, Peters IA, Borsboom GJ, Knapen MFCM, Bonsel GJ. Inequalities in uptake of prenatal screening according to ethnicity and socio-economic status in the four largest cities of the Netherlands (2011-2013). Prenat Diagn 2017. [PMID: 28621806 DOI: 10.1002/pd.5089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In the Netherlands, all women are claimed to have equal access to prenatal screening (PS). Prior research demonstrated substantial inequalities in PS uptake associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic background. The suggested pathway was a lack of intention to participate in PS among these subgroups. We studied the background of inequalities in PS participation, challenging intention heterogeneity as the single explanation. METHODS Multivariable logistic regression analyses of the national PS registry, focusing on the four largest cities in the Netherlands (n = 4578, years 2011-2013), stratified by SES. OUTCOME MEASURES (1) any uptake of PS (yes/no) and (2) uptake (one/two tests) for women who intended to participate in two tests. Determinants included intention, ethnicity, practice, and age. RESULTS Of non-Western women, 85.7% were screened versus 89.7% of Western women. Intention was an important explanatory factor in all models. However, after correction for intention, ethnicity remained a significant determinant for differences in uptake. Ethnicity and SES also interacted, indicating that non-Western women in low SES areas had the lowest uptake (corrected for intention). CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE Socioeconomic status and ethnicity related inequalities in PS uptake are only partially explained by intention heterogeneity; other pathways, in particular provider-related determinants, may play a role. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke G Posthumus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ingrid A Peters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J Borsboom
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest Region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gouke J Bonsel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Utrecht Medical Centre (UMCU), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peters IA, Posthumus AG, Reijerink-Verheij JCIY, Van Agt HME, Knapen MFCM, Denktaş S. Effect of culturally competent educational films about prenatal screening on informed decision making of pregnant women in the Netherlands. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2017; 100:776-782. [PMID: 27887753 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/12/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of a culturally competent educational film (CCEF) on informed decision making (IDM) regarding prenatal screening (PS) in a study population consisting of multicultural pregnant women. METHODS A cross-sectional study with 262 women in the control group and 117 in the intervention group. All counselled participants received a self-report questionnaire to obtain data on IDM and only the intervention group received the CCEF. Twenty two percent of the study population had an ethnic minority background and 52% had a low or medium educational level. RESULTS After exposure to the CCEF, knowledge about the Fetal Anomaly Scan (FAS) was significantly increased in ethnic minority women and in 'medium' and 'highly' educated women. Among women in the intervention group who had the intention to participate in FAS, there was an increase of 11% in IDM and a decrease of 12% in uninformed decision making. CONCLUSION CCEF leads to a significant increase in the level of knowledge in medium and highly educated groups as well as non-western ethnic minority groups. The increase in IDM among intentional participants in the FAS is promising as well. CCEF's are a valuable complement to counseling about PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I A Peters
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - A G Posthumus
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - H M E Van Agt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M F C M Knapen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Erasmus, University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Foundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Denktaş
- Department Social and Behavioural Sciences, Erasmus University College, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith SK, Sousa MS, Essink-Bot ML, Halliday J, Peate M, Fransen M. Socioeconomic Differences in Informed Decisions About Down Syndrome Screening: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21:868-907. [PMID: 27410478 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1177145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Supporting pregnant women to make informed choices about Down syndrome screening is widely endorsed. We reviewed the literature on: (a) the association between socioeconomic position and informed choices and decision-making about Down syndrome screening, and (b) the possible mediating variables (e.g., health literacy, numeracy skills, behavioral and communication variables) that might explain the relationship. EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched from January 1999 to September 2014. The methodological quality of studies was determined by predefined criteria regarding the research aims, study design, study population and setting, measurement tools, and statistical analysis. A total of 33 studies met the inclusion criteria. Women from lower socioeconomic groups experience greater difficulties making informed choices about Down syndrome screening compared to women from higher socioeconomic groups. Most studies focus on individual dimensions of informed decision-making rather than assessing elements in conjunction with one another. Few studies have explored why there are socioeconomic differences in women's ability to make informed screening decisions. Future work is needed to identify mediating variables in this pathway. Systematic evidence-based intervention development to improve communication, understanding, and decision-making about Down syndrome screening is needed to ensure that women have an equal opportunity to make an informed choice about screening regardless of their socioeconomic position.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sian K Smith
- a Psychosocial Research Group, Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Mariana S Sousa
- b Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, School of Nursing and Midwifery , University of Western Sydney , Penrith , New South Wales , Australia
- c Prince of Wales Clinical School , University of New South Wales , Sydney , New South Wales , Australia
| | - Marie-Louise Essink-Bot
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| | - Jane Halliday
- e Murdoch Children's Research Institute , Royal Children's Hospital , Melbourne , Victoria , Australia
- f Department of Paediatrics , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- g Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital , University of Melbourne , Parkville , Victoria , Australia
| | - Mirjam Fransen
- d Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Field D, Boyle E, Draper E, Evans A, Johnson S, Khan K, Manktelow B, Marlow N, Petrou S, Pritchard C, Seaton S, Smith L. Towards reducing variations in infant mortality and morbidity: a population-based approach. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundOur aims were (1) to improve understanding of regional variation in early-life mortality rates and the UK’s poor performance in international comparisons; and (2) to identify the extent to which late and moderately preterm (LMPT) birth contributes to early childhood mortality and morbidity.ObjectiveTo undertake a programme of linked population-based research studies to work towards reducing variations in infant mortality and morbidity rates.DesignTwo interlinked streams: (1) a detailed analysis of national and regional data sets and (2) establishment of cohorts of LMPT babies and term-born control babies.SettingCohorts were drawn from the geographically defined areas of Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire, and analyses were carried out at the University of Leicester.Data sourcesFor stream 1, national data were obtained from four sources: the Office for National Statistics, NHS Numbers for Babies, Centre for Maternal and Child Enquiries and East Midlands and South Yorkshire Congenital Anomalies Register. For stream 2, prospective data were collected for 1130 LMPT babies and 1255 term-born control babies.Main outcome measuresDetailed analysis of stillbirth and early childhood mortality rates with a particular focus on factors leading to biased or unfair comparison; review of clinical, health economic and developmental outcomes over the first 2 years of life for LMPT and term-born babies.ResultsThe deprivation gap in neonatal mortality has widened over time, despite government efforts to reduce it. Stillbirth rates are twice as high in the most deprived as in the least deprived decile. Approximately 70% of all infant deaths are the result of either preterm birth or a major congenital abnormality, and these are heavily influenced by mothers’ exposure to deprivation. Births at < 24 weeks’ gestation constitute only 1% of all births, but account for 20% of infant mortality. Classification of birth status for these babies varies widely across England. Risk of LMPT birth is greatest in the most deprived groups within society. Compared with term-born peers, LMPT babies are at an increased risk of neonatal morbidity, neonatal unit admission and poorer long-term health and developmental outcomes. Cognitive and socioemotional development problems confer the greatest long-term burden, with the risk being amplified by socioeconomic factors. During the first 24 months of life each child born LMPT generates approximately £3500 of additional health and societal costs.ConclusionsHealth professionals should be cautious in reviewing unadjusted early-life mortality rates, particularly when these relate to individual trusts. When more sophisticated analysis is not possible, babies of < 24 weeks’ gestation should be excluded. Neonatal services should review the care they offer to babies born LMPT to ensure that it is appropriate to their needs. The risk of adverse outcome is low in LMPT children. However, the risk appears higher for some types of antenatal problems and when the mother is from a deprived background.Future workFuture work could include studies to improve our understanding of how deprivation increases the risk of mortality and morbidity in early life and investigation of longer-term outcomes and interventions in at-risk LMPT infants to improve future attainment.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Field
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Elaine Boyle
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Elizabeth Draper
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alun Evans
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Samantha Johnson
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Kamran Khan
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Bradley Manktelow
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Neil Marlow
- Institute for Women’s Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - Sarah Seaton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lucy Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Budd JLS, Draper ES, Lotto RR, Berry LE, Smith LK. Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100:F400-4. [PMID: 26071456 PMCID: PMC4552926 DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-306985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy associated with Down syndrome (DS) compared with other congenital anomalies screened for during pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING Retrospective population-based registry study (East Midlands & South Yorkshire in England). PARTICIPANTS All registered cases of DS and nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome (the UK Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP)9) with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Poisson regression models were used to explore outcome measures, including socioeconomic variation in rates of anomaly; antenatal detection; pregnancy outcome; live birth incidence and neonatal mortality. Deprivation was measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 at super output area level. RESULTS There were 1151 cases of DS and 1572 cases of the nine severe anomalies combined. The overall rate of antenatal detection was 57% for DS, which decreased with increasing deprivation (rate ratio comparing the most deprived tenth with the least deprived: 0.76 (0.60 to 0.97)). Antenatal detection rates were considerably higher for FASP9 anomalies (86%), with no evidence of a trend with deprivation (0.99 95% CI (0.84 to 1.17)). The termination of pregnancy rate following antenatal diagnosis was higher for DS (86%) than the FASP9 anomalies (70%). Both groups showed wide socioeconomic variation in the termination of pregnancy rate (rate ratio: DS: 0.76 (0.58 to 0.99); FASP9 anomalies: 0.80 (0.65 to 0.97)). Consequently, socioeconomic inequalities in live birth and neonatal mortality rates associated with these anomalies arise that were not observed in utero. CONCLUSIONS Socioeconomic inequalities exist in the antenatal detection of DS, and subsequent termination rates are much higher for DS than other anomalies. Termination rates for all anomalies are lower in more deprived areas leading to wide socioeconomic inequalities in live born infants with a congenital anomaly, particularly DS, and subsequent neonatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith L S Budd
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Robyn R Lotto
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Laura E Berry
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lucy K Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Assessing the impact of the SOGC recommendations to increase access to prenatal screening on overall use of health resources in pregnancy. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2013; 35:444-453. [PMID: 23756275 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30935-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The recommendation by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada that prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy be offered to all pregnant women is an important change in clinical obstetrics. However, it is unknown how this recommendation might affect the use of other health resources during pregnancy. METHODS Twelve clinical and administrative databases were linked, and care paths outlining typical service use in pregnancy were created based on the type of prenatal screening accessed (first trimester screening [FTS], maternal serum screening [MSS], invasive testing only, or no screening and/or diagnosis). Logistic, Poisson, and negative binomial models were applied to the data to examine the association between use of prenatal screening/diagnosis and other health services during pregnancy. RESULTS Women who accessed prenatal screening/diagnosis were significantly more likely to have a consultation with a medical geneticist (FTS OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.75 to 3.33; MSS OR 4.84; 95% CI 2.92 to 8.03; and invasive testing OR 8.58; 95% CI 5.28 to 13.94), and women who accessed FTS had more prenatal visits (FTS incidence rate ratio 1.03; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05) than women who did not access prenatal screening/diagnosis. Uptake of invasive tests did not differ between women who accessed FTS and those who accessed MSS. Use of prenatal screening/diagnosis was not significantly associated with use of most other health resources CONCLUSION In a publicly funded health care system, understanding the impact of recommendations to increase access to a specific service on other services is important. Recommendations to increase access to prenatal screening services may have some unanticipated downstream effects on the use of other services during pregnancy. However, most aspects of health resource use in pregnancy do not appear to be influenced by the use of prenatal screening services.
Collapse
|
10
|
McNeill J, Lynn F, Alderdice F. Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 2012; 12:955. [PMID: 23134701 PMCID: PMC3544621 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Accepted: 10/29/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Maternity care providers, particularly midwives, have a window of opportunity to influence pregnant women about positive health choices. This aim of this paper is to identify evidence of effective public health interventions from good quality systematic reviews that could be conducted by midwives. METHODS Relevant databases including MEDLINE, Pubmed, EBSCO, CRD, MIDIRS, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Econlit were searched to identify systematic reviews in October 2010. Quality assessment of all reviews was conducted. RESULTS Thirty-six good quality systematic reviews were identified which reported on effective interventions. The reviews were conducted on a diverse range of interventions across the reproductive continuum and were categorised under: screening; supplementation; support; education; mental health; birthing environment; clinical care in labour and breast feeding. The scope and strength of the review findings are discussed in relation to current practice. A logic model was developed to provide an overarching framework of midwifery public health roles to inform research policy and practice. CONCLUSIONS This review provides a broad scope of high quality systematic review evidence and definitively highlights the challenge of knowledge transfer from research into practice. The review also identified gaps in knowledge around the impact of core midwifery practice on public health outcomes and the value of this contribution. This review provides evidence for researchers and funders as to the gaps in current knowledge and should be used to inform the strategic direction of the role of midwifery in public health in policy and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny McNeill
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
| | - Fiona Lynn
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
| | - Fiona Alderdice
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Queen’s University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Yu J. A systematic review of issues around antenatal screening and prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders: women of Asian origin in western countries. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2012; 20:329-346. [PMID: 22067008 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01036.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Antenatal screening has become standard practice in many countries. However, not all pregnant women choose to be tested. In the UK, the incidence of some birth defects is found to be higher in babies of Asian women than in those of women from other ethnic groups, while there is some evidence suggesting that ethnic minorities, especially Asian women, are less likely to undergo antenatal screening and prenatal diagnosis, the reasons for which are unclear. This study aims to identify and describe the literature on issues around antenatal screening and prenatal diagnostic testing for genetic disorders among women of Asian descent in western countries. The Medline, CINAHL, ASSIA and PsycInfo databases were searched for the period of 1995 and 2010. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and were therefore reviewed. In general, Asian women were found to hold favourable attitudes towards testing. However, they reported a poorer understanding of testing than white women and not being offered a test, and were less able to make informed choices. Asian women in the UK and Australia were found to be less likely than their white counterparts to have undergone prenatal diagnosis, while such differences were not found in the USA and Canada. The equity of access to quality antenatal care, alongside comprehensive well thought out antenatal screening programmes, can be assured if strategies are in place which actively involve all ethnic groups and take account of social and cultural appropriateness for the population served. An understanding of broad factors that inform women's decision-making on test uptake would help health professionals provide women and their families with more culturally sensitive information and support that they may additionally need to make more informed choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juping Yu
- University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd, Mid Glamorgan, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prathapan S, Adams J, Bythell M, Rankin J. Are there socio-economic inequalities in the uptake of Down syndrome screening in the UK? Prenat Diagn 2012; 32:293-5. [DOI: 10.1002/pd.2927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shamini Prathapan
- Institute of Health and Society; Newcastle University; Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX UK
| | - Jean Adams
- Institute of Health and Society; Newcastle University; Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX UK
| | - Mary Bythell
- Regional Maternity Survey Office; 1-2 Claremont Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AE UK
| | - Judith Rankin
- Institute of Health and Society; Newcastle University; Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX UK
- Regional Maternity Survey Office; 1-2 Claremont Road Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AE UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Smith LK, Budd JLS, Field DJ, Draper ES. Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study. BMJ 2011; 343:d4306. [PMID: 21771825 PMCID: PMC3139368 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d4306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2011] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies. DESIGN Retrospective population based registry study. SETTING East Midlands and South Yorkshire regions of England (representing about 10% of births in England and Wales). PARTICIPANTS All registered cases of nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome audited as part of the United Kingdom's fetal anomaly screening programme with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Socioeconomic variation in the risk of selected congenital anomalies; outcome of pregnancy; incidence of live birth and neonatal mortality over time. Deprivation measured with the index of multiple deprivation 2004 at super output area level. RESULTS There were 1579 fetuses registered with one of the nine selected congenital anomalies. There was no evidence of variation in the overall risk of these anomalies with deprivation (rate ratio for the most deprived 10th with the least deprived 10th: 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.23). The rate ratio varied with type of anomaly and maternal age (deprivation rate ratio adjusted for maternal age: 1.43 (1.17 to 1.74) for non-chromosomal anomalies; 0.85 (0.63 to 1.15) for chromosomal anomalies). Of the nine anomalies, 86% were detected in the antenatal period, and there was no evidence that this varied with deprivation (rate ratio 0.99, 0.84 to 1.17). The rate of termination after antenatal diagnosis of a congenital anomaly was lower in the most deprived areas compared with the least deprived areas (63% v 79%; rate ratio 0.80, 0.65 to 0.97). Consequently there were significant socioeconomic inequalities in the rate of live birth and neonatal mortality associated with the presence of any of these nine anomalies. Compared with the least deprived areas, the most deprived areas had a 61% higher rate of live births (1.61, 1.21 to 2.15) and a 98% higher neonatal mortality rate (1.98, 1.20 to 3.27) associated with a congenital anomaly. CONCLUSIONS Antenatal screening for congenital anomalies has reduced neonatal mortality through termination of pregnancy. Socioeconomic variation in decisions regarding termination of pregnancy after antenatal detection, however, has resulted in wide socioeconomic inequalities in liveborn infants with a congenital anomaly and subsequent neonatal mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy K Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, UK.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
MAXWELL S, BRAMELD K, BOWER C, DICKINSON JE, GOLDBLATT J, HADLOW N, HEWITT B, MURCH A, MURPHY A, STOCK R, O’LEARY P. Socio-demographic disparities in the uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 51:9-16. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.2010.01250.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
15
|
A Pilot Study to Explore Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs about Sickle Cell Trait and Disease. J Natl Med Assoc 2009; 101:1163-72. [DOI: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31113-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
16
|
McNeill J, Alderdice F. Exploring the perspective of midwives involved in offering serum screening for Down’s syndrome in Northern Ireland. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18:2888-96. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02761.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
17
|
Kelly C, Alderdice F, Lohan M. Psychosocial challenges of testing positive for HIV during pregnancy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009. [DOI: 10.12968/bjom.2009.17.2.39375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Carmel Kelly
- School of Nursing & Midwifery Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast
| | - Fiona Alderdice
- School of Nursing & Midwifery Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast
| | - Maria Lohan
- School of Nursing & Midwifery Research Unit, Queen's University of Belfast
| |
Collapse
|