1
|
Leon P, Saint F, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Allory Y, Loriot Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Pradère B, Seisen T, Traxer O, Xylinas E, Roupret M, Neuzillet Y. Recommandations du Comité de cancérologie de l’Association Française d’Urologie (CC-AFU) pour la bonne pratique des instillations intravésicales de mitomycine C, d’épirubicine et de BCG pour le traitement des tumeurs de la vessie n’infiltrant pas le muscle (TVNIM). Prog Urol 2022; 32:299-311. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
2
|
Audenet F, Sotto A, Roumiguié M, Allory Y, Andrejak C, Leon P, Loriot Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Pradère B, Seisen T, Traxer O, Xylinas E, Bruyère F, Roupret M, Saint F, Neuzillet Y. Recommandations des Comités de cancérologie (CC-AFU) et d’infectiologie (CI-AFU) de l’Association française d’urologie pour la prise en charge effets indésirables et complications du BCG. Prog Urol 2022; 32:165-176. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Revised: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
3
|
Acute Hepatitis Induced by Intravesical BCG Therapy: A Rare but Serious Complication. Case Reports Hepatol 2021; 2021:4574879. [PMID: 34258085 PMCID: PMC8253630 DOI: 10.1155/2021/4574879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacillus Calmette and Guérin (BCG), widely used as a vaccination to prevent tuberculosis, is also used as immunotherapy, by intrabladder instillation, to treat superficial bladder cancers and prevent recurrence. Complications following instillation of BCG are most often localized reactions, such as cystitis or hematuria. They can more rarely be generalized and potentially severe such as hepatitis, pneumopathies, aortitis, and localization to hematopoietic tissue. We have reported the observation of a 47-year-old patient followed up for a bladder tumor operated for transurethral resection of the bladder, then having benefited from an instillation of BCG therapy complicated by occurrence a week later of an acute hepatitis. The diagnostic time was 2 days, and the outcome was favorable with corticosteroid therapy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Rouprêt M, Pignot G, Masson-Lecomte A, Compérat E, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Houédé N, Larré S, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: bladder cancer]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S78-S135. [PMID: 33349431 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30751-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To update French guidelines for the management of bladder cancer specifically non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancers (MIBC). METHODS - A Medline search was achieved between 2018 and 2020, notably regarding diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS - Diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is based on a complete deep resection of the tumor. The use of fluorescence and a second-look indication are essential to improve initial diagnosis. Risks of both recurrence and progression can be estimated using the EORTC score. A stratification of patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups is pivotal for recommending adjuvant treatment: instillation of chemotherapy (immediate post-operative, standard schedule) or intravesical BCG (standard schedule and maintenance). Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-refractory patients. Extension evaluation of MIBC is based on contrast-enhanced pelvic-abdominal and thoracic CT-scan. Multiparametric MRI can be an alternative. Cystectomy associated with extended lymph nodes dissection is considered the gold standard for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients. An orthotopic bladder substitution should be proposed to both male and female patients with no contraindication and in cases of negative frozen urethral samples; otherwise transileal ureterostomy is recommended as urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line chemotherapy using platin is recommended (GC or MVAC), when performans status (PS <1) and renal function (creatinine clearance >60 mL/min) allow it (only in 50% of cases). In second line treatment, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival. CONCLUSION - These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment of patients diagnosed with NMIBC and MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-uro, AP-HP, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, Université Paris-Diderot, 10, avenue de Verdun, 75010 Paris, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 40, rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, 1, avenue du Professeur-Jean-Poulhès, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Carémeau, Université de Montpellier, rue du Professeur-Robert-Debré, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris-Descartes, 46, rue Henri-Huchard, 75018 Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, rue du Général Koenig, 51100 Reims, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Université de Paris, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
[Urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates: The French guidelines from CTAFU]. Prog Urol 2021; 31:31-38. [PMID: 33423744 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose surgical recommendations for urothelial carcinoma management in kidney transplant recipients and candidates. METHOD A review of the literature (Medline) following a systematic approcah was conducted by the CTAFU regarding the epidemiology, screening, diagnosis and treatment of urothelial carcinoma in kidney transplant recipients and candidates for renal transplantation. References were assessed according to a predefined process to propose recommendations with levels of evidence. RESULTS Urothelial carcinomas occur in the renal transplant recipient population with a 3-fold increased incidence as compared with general population. While major risk factors for urothelial carcinomas are similar to those in the general population, aristolochic acid nephropathy and BK virus infection are more frequent risk factors in renal transplant recipients. As compared with general population, NMIBC in the renal transplant recipients are associated with earlier and higher recurrence rate. The safety and efficacy of adjuvant intravesical therapies have been reported in retrospective series. Treatment for localized MIBC in renal transplant recipients is based on radical cystectomy. In the candidate for a kidney transplant with a history of urothelial tumor, it is imperative to perform follow-up cystoscopies according to the recommended frequency, depending on the risk of recurrence and progression of NMIBC and to maintain this follow-up at least every six months up to transplantation whatever the level of risk of recurrence and progression. Based on current data, the present recommendations propose guidelines for waiting period before active wait-listing renal transplant candidates with a history of urothelial carcinoma. CONCLUSION The french recommendations from CTAFU should contribute to improve the management of urothelial carcinoma in renal transplant patients and renal transplant candidates by integrating both oncologic objectives and access to transplantation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Compérat E, Audenet F, Houédé N, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Roumiguié M, Méjean A. French ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Bladder cancer. Prog Urol 2020; 28:R48-R80. [PMID: 32093463 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective To propose updated French guidelines for non-muscle invasive (NMIBC) and muscle-invasive (MIBC) bladder cancers. Methods A Medline search was achieved between 2015 and 2018, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of bladder cancer, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. Results Diagnosis of NMIBC (Ta, T1, CIS) is based on a complete deep resection of the tumor. The use of fluorescence and a second-look indication are essential to improve initial diagnosis. Risks of both recurrence and progression can be estimated using the EORTC score. A stratification of patients into low, intermediate and high risk groups is pivotal for recommending adjuvant treatment: instillation of chemotherapy (immediate post-operative, standard schedule) or intravesical BCG (standard schedule and maintenance). Cystectomy is recommended in BCG-refractory patients. Extension evaluation of MIBC is based on contrast-enhanced pelvic-abdominal and thoracic CT-scan. Multiparametric MRI can be an alternative. Cystectomy associated with extended lymph nodes dissection is considered the gold standard for non-metastatic MIBC. It should be preceded by cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients. An orthotopic bladder substitution should be proposed to both male and female patients with no contraindication and in cases of negative frozen urethral samples; otherwise transileal ureterostomy is recommended as urinary diversion. All patients should be included in an Early Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol. For metastatic MIBC, first-line chemotherapy using platin is recommended (GC or MVAC), when performans status (PS < 1) and renal function (creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min) allow it (only in 50 % of cases). In second line treatment, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival. Conclusion These updated French guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for NMIBC and MIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne université, AP–HP, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’anatomie pathologique, GRC no 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP–HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Département d’oncologie médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, 51100 France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, AP–HP, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59800 Lille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie de l’hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, université Paris-Descartes, AP–HP, 75018 Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Département d’urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, 31000 France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l’Association française d’urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l’urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France,Service d’urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP–HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Méjean A, Rouprêt M, Rozet F, Bensalah K, Murez T, Game X, Rebillard X, Mallet R, Faix A, Mongiat-Artus P, Fournier G, Neuzillet Y. [Recommendations CCAFU on the management of cancers of the urogenital system during an epidemic with Coronavirus COVID-19]. Prog Urol 2020; 30:221-231. [PMID: 32224294 PMCID: PMC7146722 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2020.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Objectif La population française est confrontée à la pandémie de COVID-19 et le système de santé a été réorienté en urgence pour la prise en charge des patients atteints du coronavirus. La prise en charge des cancers de l’appareil urinaire et génital masculin doit être adaptée à ce contexte. Matériel et méthode Un avis d’experts documenté par une revue de la littérature a été formulé par le Comité de Cancérologie de l’Association Française d’Urologie (CCAFU). Résultats La prise en charge médicale et chirurgicale des patients atteints de cancers de l’appareil urinaire et génital masculin doit être adaptée en modifiant les modalités de consultation, en priorisant les interventions en fonction du pronostic intrinsèque des cancers en tenant compte des comorbidités du patient. La protection des urologues vis-à-vis du COVID-19 doit être prise en considération. Conclusion Le CCAFU émet un avis d’experts quant aux mesures à prendre pour adapter la prise en charge des cancers de l’appareil urinaire et génital masculin au contexte de pandémie par COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - F Rozet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - K Bensalah
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - T Murez
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - X Game
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - X Rebillard
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - R Mallet
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - A Faix
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - P Mongiat-Artus
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - G Fournier
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Bureau du Conseil d'administration d'Association française d'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khan W, Zugail AS, Blanc E, Neuziller Y, Lebret T. Reasons for intravesical instillation postponement during adjuvant treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A prospective study. Prog Urol 2020; 30:75-79. [PMID: 31953014 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravesical instillations for adjuvant treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) may be postponed of necessity. However, the frequency and reasons for postponement are unclear. MATERIALS We carried out a prospective, epidemiological study in an Urology department of the Île-de-France, between August 2016 and March 2017, to determine the frequency and reasons for postponement of intravesical instillations during adjuvant treatment of NMIBC. One-hundred consecutive patients treated by intravesical instillations of mitomycin C (MMC) or Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) were included. At each session and in case of instillation postponement, the medical team completed a specially designed questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 541 instillations were performed in the 100 patients. Twenty-four instillations (4.4%) were postponed in 19 patients. The major cause of postponement was an untreated positive urine analysis and culture (UAC) in 13/24 (54%) cases. The causes of cancellation did not differ significantly between MMC and BCG. The most frequently cancelled instillations were the first in the therapeutic protocol in 26% of cases. The number of instillations preceding those cancelled did not differ significantly between MMC and BCG (2.1±2.0 instillations for MMC vs. 1.5±1.6 for BCG; P=0.64). CONCLUSIONS There was a low rate of postponed instillations (4.4%). The main reasons, namely an untreated UAC and a positive dipstick test, based on the jurisprudence, are not included in the latest CC-AFU guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Khan
- Department of urology, Foch hospital, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes France.
| | - A S Zugail
- Department of surgery, faculty of medicine in Rabigh, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - E Blanc
- Department of urology, Foch hospital, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes France
| | - Y Neuziller
- Department of urology, Foch hospital, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes France
| | - T Lebret
- Department of urology, Foch hospital, University of Versailles, Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Pignot G, Compérat E, Audenet F, Houédé N, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Roumiguié M, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la vessie French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Bladder cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S46-S78. [PMID: 30366708 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations. Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article. This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published. The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.006. That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne université, GRC no5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne université, GRC no5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30000 Nîmes, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, 51100 France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59800 Lille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13008 Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, université Paris-Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, 31000 France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
BCGites après immunothérapie pour cancer de vessie, une pathologie hétérogène: physiopathologie, description clinique, prise en charge diagnostique et thérapeutique. Rev Mal Respir 2018; 35:416-429. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmr.2017.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
11
|
Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y, Masson-Lecomte A, Colin P, Compérat E, Dubosq F, Houédé N, Larré S, Pignot G, Puech P, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Méjean A. Recommandations en onco-urologie 2016-2018 du CCAFU : Tumeurs de la vessie. Prog Urol 2016; 27 Suppl 1:S67-S91. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(16)30704-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
12
|
[Evaluation of adverse events caused by intravesical BCG instillations: Has the strain used a potential implication?]. Prog Urol 2015; 26:73-8. [PMID: 26711556 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2015] [Revised: 11/07/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Intravesical instillations of BCG represent an established treatment of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer but also carry considerable toxicity. The aim of this work was to identify adverse effects, their impact on the treatment and the possible involvement of the BCG strain used. MATERIAL AND METHODS To evaluate adverse events in terms of incidence, severity and moment of occurrence, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients treated with BCG in our institution from 1998 to 2012. RESULTS One hundred and forty-six patients were retained for analysis, 140 (95.9%) finished their first induction cycle. Thirty patients (20.6%) had to stop the treatment because of BCG-related adverse events, 80% of which happened during the first 3 BCG cycles (12 instillations). The strain used may have had a significant impact: 16 out of 42 patients (38.1%) treated with Connaught (Immucyst®) and 14 out of 104 patients (13.5%) treated with Tice (Oncotice®) had to stop treatment because of BCG related adverse events (P=0.0019) with an odds ratio of 2.83 (IC 95%: 1.52-5.23). CONCLUSION BCG-related adverse events generally occur at the beginning of the treatment and therefore do not limit the use of BCG maintenance therapy. Good instillation practice and, in our series, the shift from Connaught to Tice strain enabled to significantly reduce BCG-related adverse events through time. The potential implication of the BCG strain used should be evaluated in prospective trials.
Collapse
|
13
|
Raffray L, Rivière P, Bonnet H, Duffau P, Longy-Boursier M. Hépatite granulomateuse révélant une infection disséminée à Mycobacterium bovis après BCG-thérapie intravésicale. Rev Med Interne 2015; 36:626-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2014.10.361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2013] [Revised: 05/21/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
14
|
Neuzillet Y. Principes de la prise en charge des tumeurs de vessie n’infiltrant pas le muscle (TVNIM) en 2015. ONCOLOGIE 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s10269-015-2502-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
15
|
Fillion A, Koutlidis N, Froissart A, Fantin B. [Investigation and management of genito-urinary tuberculosis]. Rev Med Interne 2014; 35:808-14. [PMID: 25240482 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2014.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2013] [Revised: 05/28/2014] [Accepted: 07/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Genito-urinary tuberculosis is the fourth most common manifestation of the disease, but it is often underestimated by clinicians because of few and non-specific symptoms and insidious disease course. The most common urinary findings are multiple ureteral stenosis. The most common genital involvement is an epididymal nodule for men and a chronic salpingitis for women. The definite diagnosis of genito-urinary tuberculosis is obtained on the basis of culture studies. Due to the paucibacillary nature of the disease, especially of genital location in woman, a probable or presumptive diagnosis is frequently considered with several parameters including radiological imaging (abdominal CT-scan, pelvic ultrasound, pelvic MRI). Endoscopic and surgical procedures are frequently required to obtain specimens for histopathologic and bacteriological studies. Medical treatment is the method of choice, with a combination of four drugs, namely isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol and pyrazinamide, followed by a two-drug regimen, for a total of six month duration. Surgery might be indicated in complicated genito-urinary tuberculosis (decreased renal function, infertility, urologic complaints).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fillion
- Département d'infectiologie, CHU de Dijon, 14, rue Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21079 Dijon cedex, France.
| | - N Koutlidis
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Dijon, 14, rue Gaffarel, BP 77908, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - A Froissart
- Service de médecine interne, centre hospitalier intercommunal de Créteil, 40, avenue de Verdun, 94010 Créteil cedex, France
| | - B Fantin
- Service de médecine interne, hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du Général-Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lotte R, Durand M, Mbeutcha A, Ambrosetti D, Pulcini C, Degand N, Loeffler J, Ruimy R, Amiel J. A rare case of histopathological bladder necrosis associated with Actinobaculum schaalii: the incremental value of an accurate microbiological diagnosis using 16S rDNA sequencing. Anaerobe 2014; 26:46-8. [PMID: 24487002 DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2013] [Revised: 01/10/2014] [Accepted: 01/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
We describe here a rare case of bladder wall necrosis associated with Actinobaculum schaalii in a 72-year-old patient with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). A. schaalii microbiological diagnosis requires high index of suspicion and accurate identification methods such as 16S rDNA sequencing or MALDI-TOF Mass spectrometry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Lotte
- Department of Bacteriology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France.
| | - Matthieu Durand
- Department of Urology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| | | | - Damien Ambrosetti
- Department of Pathology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| | - Céline Pulcini
- Department of Infectious Diseases at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| | - Nicolas Degand
- Department of Bacteriology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| | - Joyce Loeffler
- Department of Urology at Grasse General Hospital, France
| | - Raymond Ruimy
- Department of Bacteriology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| | - Jean Amiel
- Department of Urology at Nice Academic Hospital, France; Nice Medical University, Nice-Sophia Antipolis University, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pfister C, Roupret M, Neuzillet Y, Larré S, Pignot G, Quintens H, Houedé N, Compérat E, Colin P, Roy C, Davin JL, Guy L, Irani J, Lebret T, Coloby P, Soulié M. Recommandations en onco-urologie 2013 du CCAFU : Tumeurs de la vessie. Prog Urol 2013; 23 Suppl 2:S105-25. [DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(13)70049-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|