Social media and radiography research: Ethical considerations

Social media for radiologists: opportunities and challenges

The use of social media in medicine offers unprecedented opportunities for social interaction. Activity on platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn plays crucial roles in various medical services, particularly regarding patients' access to information and healthcare services, medical education, and professional networking. However, the integration of social media into healthcare is not challenge-free and has certain pitfalls. In this article, we address several critical issues that compromise the reliability and effectiveness of social media as a professional healthcare resource, particularly in the field of radiology. We discuss possible solutions and tips and tricks to facilitate the use of this valuable tool to our advantage and in a reliable manner.

Radiographer abnormality flagging systems in the UK - A preliminary updated assessment of practice

INTRODUCTION

Radiographer abnormality flagging systems have been in use in the UK for over 30 years, with the guidance of the Society and College of Radiographers indicated that the preliminary clinical evaluation (PCE), or comment, be the preferred system of choice. This study aimed to provide an updated assessment of current practice based upon a previous 2008 study.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey was disseminated via Twitter and aimed at departmental and reporting leads. It requested information on the types of flagging and reporting systems operated, scope of the systems employed, required education of participants, and the role of audit.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 31 Trusts within the UK. Red dot systems were employed in 90% (n = 28) of sites, with 26% (n = 8) undertaking PCE. Skeletal radiographs were most commonly reviewed (90%; n = 28) followed by chest (58%; n = 18) and abdomen (32%; n = 10). Only 13% (n = 4) sites indicated if the image was normal but 71% (n = 22) allowed the radiographer to indicate if they were unsure. There was marked variation in the educational requirements and use of audit.

CONCLUSION

Compared to 2008 there appears to be quite minimal change in practices in the UK. There does appear to be some increase in the use of flagging systems generally and a higher proportion of PCE systems in comparison to red dot but the use of education and audit does not necessarily show much development in the past 15 years.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Significant conclusions cannot be drawn due to limited sample size, however, it may support further study and consideration in relation to implementation and potentially standardisation of abnormality detection systems may be justified.

The Education and Practice Environment for Medical Radiation Science Professionals Caring for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Patients: An Analysis of a #MedRadJClub Tweet Chat

INTRODUCTION

The medical radiation sciences' (MRS) MedRadJournalClub attracts a global group of participants to monthly sessions to discuss selected journal articles. The September 2017 session explored the experiences of MRS professionals working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) patients. The aim of the chat was to establish staff educational preparation, how participants' organizations approached the issue, and what participants would do differently at work or at home in relation to this patient population after the chat.

METHOD

Data were extracted using the Twitter advanced search function with #MedRadJClub from the 19th to 23rd September 2017. The data were reviewed and categorized for themes. Tweets related to shared LGBT resources were captured, verified, and counted separately.

RESULTS

44 participants took part in the September Twitter chat. After data cleaning, 127 tweets were included for analysis with a further 16 tweets sharing LGBT resources. Almost all of the participants disclosed that they had no undergraduate education or workplace training in the care of LGBT patients. Workplaces of a limited few participants had specific approaches to improve experiences for this patient population. Many participants were eager to advocate for changes in their workplaces after the Twitter chat.

CONCLUSION

There is still work to be carried out to educate MRS professionals to enhance their LGBT patients' experience and improve workplaces. Positive changes in education and a more inclusive clinical environment will ultimately improve care for LGBT patients.