1
|
Selva A, Bianchi A, Cirrone GAP, Petringa G, Romano F, Schettino G, Conte V. Sensitivity of a mini-TEPC to radiation quality variations in clinical proton beams. Phys Med 2024; 118:103201. [PMID: 38199179 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This work aims at studying the sensitivity of a miniaturized Tissue-Equivalent Proportional Counter to variations of beam quality in clinical radiation fields, to further investigate its performances as radiation quality monitor. METHODS Measurements were taken at the CATANA facility (INFN-LNS, Catania, Italy), in a monoenergetic and an energy-modulated proton beam with the same initial energy of 62 MeV. PMMA layers were placed in front of the detector to measure at different depths along the depth-dose profile. The frequency- and dose-mean lineal energy were compared to the track- and dose-averaged LET calculated by Monte Carlo simulations. A microdosimetric evaluation of the Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) was performed and compared with cell survival experiments. RESULTS Microdosimetric distributions measured at identical depths in the two beams show spectral differences reflecting their different radiation quality. Discrepancies are most evident at depths corresponding to the Spread-Out Bragg Peak, while spectra at the entrance and in the dose fall-off regions are similar. This can be explained by the different energy components that compose the pristine and spread-out peaks at each depth. The trend of microdosimetric mean values matches that of calculated LET averages along the entire penetration depth, and the microdosimetric estimation of RBE is consistent with radiobiological data not only at 2 Gy but also at lower dose levels, such as those absorbed by healthy tissues. CONCLUSIONS The mini-TEPC is sensitive to differences in radiation quality resulting from different modulations of the proton beam, confirming its potential for beam quality monitoring in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Selva
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy.
| | - A Bianchi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy
| | | | - G Petringa
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, Catania, Italy
| | - F Romano
- INFN Sezione di Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - G Schettino
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science, Teddington, UK
| | - V Conte
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, Legnaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bianchi A, Agosteo S, Bortot D, Cirrone GAP, Colautti P, La Tessa C, Mazzucconi D, Missiaggia M, Petringa G, Rosenfeld AB, Selva A, Tran L, Verona C, Verona Rinati G, Conte V. Microdosimetry of a 62-MeV clinical proton beam with five detectors. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 199:1968-1972. [PMID: 37819306 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncac231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
In proton therapy, most treatment planning systems (TPS) use a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 all along the depth-dose profile. Innovative TPS are now investigated considering the variability of RBE with radiation quality. New TPS need an experimental verification in the quality assurance (QA) routine in clinics, but RBE data are usually obtained with radiobiological measurements that are time consuming and not suitable for daily QA. Microdosimetry is a useful tool based on physical measurements which can monitor the radiation quality. Several microdosimeters are available in different research institutions, which could potentially be used for the QA in TPS. In this study, the response functions of five detectors in the same 62-MeV proton Spread Out Bragg Peak is compared in terms of spectral distributions and their average values and microdosimetric RBE. Their different response function has been commented and must be considered in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bianchi
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - S Agosteo
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energia, 20156 Milano, Italy
- INFN-Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - D Bortot
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energia, 20156 Milano, Italy
- INFN-Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - G A P Cirrone
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, 95125 Catania, Italy
| | - P Colautti
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - C La Tessa
- University of Trento, Dipartimento di Fisica, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy
- Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy
| | - D Mazzucconi
- Politecnico di Milano, Dipartimento di Energia, 20156 Milano, Italy
- INFN-Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - M Missiaggia
- University of Trento, Dipartimento di Fisica, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy
- Trento Institute of Fundamental Physics and Applications, 38123 Povo, Trento, Italy
| | - G Petringa
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, 95125 Catania, Italy
- ELI Beamlines Center, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, 252 41 Dolní Břežany, Czech Republic
| | - A B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, 2522 Wollongong, Australia
| | - A Selva
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - L Tran
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, 2522 Wollongong, Australia
| | - C Verona
- INFN-Roma2, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - G Verona Rinati
- INFN-Roma2, Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - V Conte
- INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, 35020 Legnaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bianchi A, Selva A, Reniers B, Vanhavere F, Conte V. TOPAS simulations of the response of a mini-TEPC: benchmark with experimental data. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36595254 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acabfe] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Microdosimetry offers a fast tool for radiation quality (RQ) verification to be implemented in treatment planning systems in proton therapy based on variable LET or RBE to move forward from the use of a fixed RBE of 1.1. It is known that the RBE of protons can increase up to 50% higher than that value in the last few millimetres of their range. Microdosimetry can be performed both experimentally and by means of Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. This paper has the aim of comparing the two approaches.Approach. Experimental measurements have been performed using a miniaturized Tissue equivalent proportional counter developed at the Legnaro National Laboratories of the Italian National Institute for Nuclear Physics with the aim of being used as RQ monitors for high intensity beams. MC simulations have been performed using the microdosimetric extension of TOPAS which provides optimized parameters and scorers for this application.Main results. Simulations were compared with experimental microdosimetric spectra in terms of shape of the spectra and their average values. Moreover, the latter have been investigated as possible estimators of LET obtained with the same MC code. The shape of the spectra is in general consistent with the experimental distributions and the average values of the distributions in both cases can predict the RQ increase with depth.Significance. This study aims at the comparison of microdosimetric spectra obtained from both experimental measurements and the microdosimetric extension of TOPAS in the same radiation field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Bianchi
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, viale dell'Università 2, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - Anna Selva
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, viale dell'Università 2, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
| | - Brigitte Reniers
- UHasselt, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Nuclear Technology Center, Agoralaan 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Filip Vanhavere
- Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol, Belgium
| | - Valeria Conte
- INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, viale dell'Università 2, I-35020 Legnaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Selva A, Bellan L, Bianchi A, Giustiniani G, Colautti P, Fagotti E, Pisent A, Conte V. Microdosimetry of an accelerator based thermal neutron field for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy. Appl Radiat Isot 2022; 182:110144. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
5
|
Parisi A, Olko P, Swakon J, Horwacik T, Jablonski H, Malinowski L, Nowak T, Struelens L, Vanhavere F. Microdosimetric characterization of a clinical proton therapy beam: comparison between simulated lineal energy distributions in spherical water targets and experimental measurements with a silicon detector. Phys Med Biol 2021; 67. [PMID: 34933289 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective Treatment planning based on computer simulations were proposed to account for the increase in the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of proton radiotherapy beams near to the edges of the irradiated volume. Since silicon detectors could be used to validate the results of these simulations, it is important to explore the limitations of this comparison. Approach Microdosimetric measurements with a MicroPlus Bridge V2 silicon detector (thickness = 10 µm) were performed along the Bragg peak of a clinical proton beam. The lineal energy distributions, the dose mean values, and the RBE calculated with a biological weighting function were compared with simulations with PHITS (microdosimetric target = 1 µm water sphere), and published clonogenic survival in vitro RBE data for the V79 cell line. The effect of the silicon-to-water conversion was also investigated by comparing three different methodologies (conversion based on a single value, novel bin-to-bin conversions based on SRIM and PSTAR). Main results Mainly due to differences in the microdosimetric targets, the experimental dose-mean lineal energy and RBE values at the distal edge were respectively up to 53% and 28% lower than the simulated ones. Furthermore, the methodology chosen for the silicon-to-water conversion was proven to affect the dose mean lineal energy and the RBE10 up to 32% and 11% respectively. The best methodology to compensate for this underestimation was the bin-to-bin silicon-to-water conversion based on PSTAR. Significance This work represents the first comparison between PHITS-simulated lineal energy distributions in water targets and corresponding experimental spectra measured with silicon detectors. Furthermore, the effect of the silicon-to-water conversion on the RBE was explored for the first time. The proposed methodology based on the PSTAR bin-to-bin conversion appears to provide superior results with respect to commonly used single scaling factors and is recommended for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pawel Olko
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Jan Swakon
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Tomasz Horwacik
- IF PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, Kraków, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Hubert Jablonski
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Leszek Malinowski
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | - Tomasz Nowak
- IFJ PAN, Walerego Eljasza Radzikowskiego 152, Krakow, 31-342, POLAND
| | | | | |
Collapse
|