1
|
Perpetual role of brachytherapy in organ-sparing treatment for bladder cancer: a historical review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2021; 12:618-628. [PMID: 33437312 PMCID: PMC7787208 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.101697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy has been applied for decades in the curative treatment for solitary, ≤ 5 cm bladder tumors. This review provides a historical perspective of this organ sparing approach. A systematic search of the published literature between 1900 and 2019 was performed on the subject of bladder brachytherapy using PubMed, with digitally retrievable articles being supplemented with articles from the personal collection of the authors. The articles were divided into consecutive time periods, each reflecting the impact of authors on the development of brachytherapy treatment: the time of pioneers, early innovators, modifiers, and recent innovators. Three case-controlled studies comparing brachytherapy-based organ-sparing treatment with cystectomy, demonstrated similarity between the two approaches in terms of disease-free and overall survival, whereas brachytherapy-based approach offered the advantage of at least 80% chance of bladder preservation. The overview was organized in a chronological order, starting from the evolution of brachytherapy from radium, followed by remote afterloading and dose-rate adjustments, and closing with modern era of high-dose-rate and image-guided brachytherapy. Importantly, we demonstrated how essential and beneficial for the patients is a close collaboration between radiation oncologists and urologists, and how adopting a modern surgical development, i.e. the laparoscopic implantation technique, which later became robot-assisted, contributed to the success of this multidisciplinary brachytherapy treatment. We concluded that this highly effective brachytherapy method with very limited toxicity deserves more worldwide popularity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mannion L, Bosco C, Nair R, Mullassery V, Enting D, Jones EL, Van Hemelrijck M, Hughes S. Overall survival, disease-specific survival and local recurrence outcomes in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy: a systematic review. BJU Int 2020; 125:780-791. [PMID: 32145711 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection is the standard radical management for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, major pelvic surgery is not suitable for all patients and combined modality therapy (CMT) offers an alternative for patients who want to retain their bladder. Brachytherapy (BT), as part of CMT, has been offered in selective cases of bladder cancer. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BT for solitary urinary bladder tumours in terms of survival, local recurrence (LR) rates, and adverse events. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using defined search terms using online databases. Articles that discussed the use of BT as part of multi-modality treatments for MIBC were included. RESULTS Searches returned 112 articles of which 20 were deemed suitable for analysis. In all, 15 of the 20 articles reported overall survival (OS) at 5 years, 2747 patients were at risk and 1670 were alive after 5 years (60%): seven studies reported OS at 10 years, with 817 patients at risk and 350 alive at 10 years (42%). Disease-specific survival at 5 years was reported in four studies, with 371 patients at risk and 279 alive (75%) at 5 years. LR rates were reported across all 20 studies and ranged from 0% to 32%. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy as part of CMT for MIBC is not a standard technique. It is an effective treatment in experienced centres for a selected patient population who wish to preserve their bladder. In such patients, CMT-BT is well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liam Mannion
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Cecilia Bosco
- Translational Oncology and Urology Research, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Rajesh Nair
- Urology Department, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Vinod Mullassery
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Deborah Enting
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma-Louise Jones
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Simon Hughes
- Guy's Cancer, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Voskuilen CS, Bosschieter J, van Werkhoven E, Hendricksen K, Vis AN, Witteveen T, Pieters BR, Burger M, Bex A, van der Poel HG, Moonen LM, Horenblas S, Nieuwenhuijzen JA, van Rhijn BWG. Long-term survival and complications following bladder-preserving brachytherapy in patients with cT1-T2 bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:130-136. [PMID: 31630869 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.09.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 09/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radical cystectomy (RC) is considered standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) and high-risk non-muscle invasive BC. In selected cases, bladder-sparing treatment using brachytherapy can be offered. We examined the outcome after brachytherapy in comparison to RC in terms of survival, complications and bladder preservation in patients with cT1G3-T2N0M0 BC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between 1988 and 2016, 301 patients underwent brachytherapy in two centres. Overall survival (OS) and disease specific survival (DSS) after brachytherapy and RC were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to determine variables associated with OS and DSS. Local recurrences, bladder preservation and salvage cystectomy (SC) after brachytherapy were reported. Complications after brachytherapy, RC and SC were compared using CTCAE criteria. RESULTS Median follow-up was 9.6 years (95% confidence interval (CI): 8.8-10.4) after brachytherapy and 10.6 years (95% CI: 10.0-11.2) after RC. Five/10-year OS was 66%/49% after brachytherapy and 68%/53% after RC (p = 0.4). Five/10-year DSS was 73%/67% after brachytherapy and 75%/65% after RC (p = 0.8). Intravesical recurrence occurred in 58/259 brachytherapy patients after which salvage cystectomy was performed in 32 patients. In total, 84% of brachytherapy-treated patients preserved their bladder. The brachytherapy cohort experienced less high grade complications than the RC cohort (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION In selected patients with solitary, ≤5 cm cT1G3-T2N0M0 bladder tumours brachytherapy is a bladder-sparing therapy with good survival outcome and with a favourable complication rate compared to RC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte S Voskuilen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith Bosschieter
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Department of Biostatistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thelma Witteveen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bradley R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Max Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Axel Bex
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, University College London, United Kingdom
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Luc M Moonen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon Horenblas
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krengli M, Pisani C, Deantonio L, Surico D, Volpe A, Surico N, Terrone C. Intraoperative radiotherapy in gynaecological and genito-urinary malignancies: focus on endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:18. [PMID: 28100242 PMCID: PMC5244540 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0748-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/21/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) refers to the delivery of a single radiation dose to a limited volume of tissue during a surgical procedure. A literature review was performed to analyze the role of IORT in gynaecological and genito-urinary cancer including endometrial, cervical, renal, bladder and prostate cancers. Literature search was performed by Pubmed and Scopus, using the words “intraoperative radiotherapy/IORT”, “gynaecological cancer”, “uterine/endometrial cancer”, “cervical/cervix cancer”, “renal/kidney cancer”, “bladder cancer” and “prostate cancer”. Forty-seven articles were selected from the search databases, analyzed and briefly described. Literature data show that IORT has been used to optimize local control rate in genito-urinary tumours mainly in retrospective studies. The results suggest that IORT could be advantageous in the setting of locally advanced and recurrent disease although further prospective trials are needed to confirm this findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Krengli
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy. .,Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
| | - Carla Pisani
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Letizia Deantonio
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Daniela Surico
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Volpe
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Nicola Surico
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Via Solaroli, 17-28100, Novara, Italy.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
GEC-ESTRO/ACROP recommendations for performing bladder-sparing treatment with brachytherapy for muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2016; 122:340-346. [PMID: 28049550 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.12.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The standard treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is a radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In selected cases a bladder sparing approach is possible, for example a limited surgical excision combined with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. To perform brachytherapy flexible catheters have to be implanted in the bladder wall. The implantation is done either by the open retropubic approach or the endoscopic surgical approach. The largest experience for brachytherapy is with low-dose rate and pulsed-dose rate, although some short-term experience with high-dose rate is also reported. The main advantage for this technique is the conservation of bladder function, with comparable local control rates as for cystectomy series in selected cases. The GEC-ESTRO/ACROP (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology / Advisory Committee on Radiation Oncology Practice) recommendations to perform bladder implantations and brachytherapy as a treatment option for MIBC are described.
Collapse
|
6
|
The Curie-Da Vinci Connection: 5-Years' Experience With Laparoscopic (Robot-Assisted) Implantation for High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy of Solitary T2 Bladder Tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 95:1439-1442. [PMID: 27296041 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report experience and early results of laparoscopic implantation for interstitial brachytherapy (BT) of solitary bladder tumors and the feasibility of a high-dose-rate (HDR) schedule. METHODS AND MATERIALS From December 2009 to April 2015, 57 patients with a T2 solitary bladder tumor were treated in Arnhem with transurethral bladder resection followed by external beam irradiation, applied to the bladder and regional iliac lymph nodes, 40 Gy in 20 fractions, 5 fractions per week, and within 1 week interstitial HDR BT, in selected cases combined with partial cystectomy and lymph node dissection. The BT catheters were placed via a transabdominal approach with robotic assistance from a Da Vinci robot after a successful initial experience with a nonrobotic laparoscopic approach. The fraction schedule for HDR was 10 fractions of 2.5 Gy, 3 fractions per day. This was calculated to be equivalent to a reference low-dose-rate schedule of 30 Gy in 60 hours. Data for oncologic outcomes and toxicity (Common Toxicity Criteria version 4) were prospectively collected. RESULTS These modifications resulted in an average postoperative hospitalization of 6 days, minimal blood loss, and no wound healing problems. Two patients had severe acute toxicity: 1 pulmonary embolism grade 4 and 1 cardiac death. Late toxicity was mild (n=2 urogenital grade 3 toxicity). The median follow-up was 2 years. Using cumulative incidence competing risk analysis, the 2-year overall, disease-free, and disease-specific survival and local control rates were 59%, 71%, 87%, and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The benefits of minimally invasive surgery for implantation of BT catheters and the feasibility of HDR BT in bladder cancer are documented. The patient outcome and adverse events are comparable to the best results published for a bladder-sparing approach.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bladder preservation with brachytherapy compared to cystectomy for T1-T3 muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2014; 6:191-9. [PMID: 25097561 PMCID: PMC4105649 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2014.43777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2014] [Revised: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radical cystectomy currently is the treatment of choice in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. However, cystectomy is associated with considerable morbidity. Bladder sparing treatment consists of transurethral resection of the tumor (with or without partial cystectomy), external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare bladder preservation with brachytherapy to cystectomy by a systematic review. Material and methods A systematic review was conducted using PubMed electronic database. Article selection was done independently by two authors. Data were extracted on cause-specific survival and overall survival at 2, 5, and 10 years. Comparison of the two treatment modalities was done by a Weibull survival analysis with metaregression analysis and estimation of Hazard Ratio's (HR's) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Large differences in tumor staging and tumor grading were found between cystectomy and bladder sparing series. The adjusted HR's for cause-specific survival and overall survival were 1.27 (95% CI: 1.15-1.40) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.84-0.87), respectively for bladder sparing relative to radical cystectomy. Conclusions Robustness of the analysis is hampered by the retrospective character of the study and differences in patient characteristics. For selected cases, bladder sparing by brachytherapy leads to at least similar overall survival compared to radical cystectomy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Steen-Banasik E, Ploeg M, Witjes JA, van Rey FS, Idema JG, Heijbroek RP, Karthaus HF, Reinders JG, Viddeleer A, Visser AG. Brachytherapy versus cystectomy in solitary bladder cancer: a case control, multicentre, East-Netherlands study. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93:352-7. [PMID: 19457565 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2008] [Revised: 04/15/2009] [Accepted: 04/18/2009] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comparing the outcome of surgery and brachytherapy-based radiotherapy in patients with solitary T1G3/T2 bladder tumour in, a retrospective case-control study, because efforts for a randomised clinical trial comparing these modalities have failed. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cystectomy group. Patients were selected using the pathological registration system (PALGA). 289 cases of TURT followed by cystectomy, indicated by a muscle--invading bladder tumour were performed in three East-Netherlands medical centres between 1991 and 2001. Out of this group 179 patients with clinical T2N0M0 bladder tumour were selected. All the consecutive files were analysed by a urologist and a radiation oncologist and 65 of those patients (mean age 63.7 years) would have been eligible for brachytherapy, based on an initial analysis: cystoscopy estimated tumour size, post-TURT pathological report, completed by CT-scan and/or, MRI-scan. A final pathological report after radical cystectomy was not considered for patients' selection. Brachytherapy group. Patients were selected using a prospective registration study aiming at determination of our treatment results. 89 Patients (mean age 68.4 years) underwent TURT followed by a course of external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy from 1983 till 2005 in the Arnhem Radiotherapy Institute. RESULTS The median follow-up for the brachytherapy group was 5.7 years (range 0.2-21.4 years), for the cystectomy group was 5.05 years (range: 0.04-16.8 years). No difference in disease-specific survival (DSS) could be detected with a 5- and 10-year DSS of 71% and 66% in the brachytherapy group and 60% and 57% in the cystectomy group, respectively. Five-year overall survival (OS) was 57% in the brachytherapy group and 52% in the cystectomy group, however, the 10-year OS was better in the cystectomy than in the brachytherapy group (42% and 33%, respectively). This is caused by the significant age difference in favour of the cystectomy group. Cystectomy-free survival in the brachytherapy group was 70%. CONCLUSION Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for patients with muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. However, in a selected patient population a bladder sparing treatment, i.e. a combination of transurethral tumour resection (TURT), external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy, can be applied successfully. This concerns a solitary, T1G3 or T2 bladder tumour, with a diameter<5 cm.
Collapse
|
9
|
Management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2009; 5:501-8. [PMID: 18769377 DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro1202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2007] [Accepted: 07/28/2008] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this Review is to critically assess the currently used methods for the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Radical cystectomy seems to be the gold standard for the treatment of bladder cancer, and the optimum extent of lymph-node dissection has now been identified. An early cystectomy should be carried out once a diagnosis of muscle invasion is established. Preoperative radiation is no longer popular, but could be due a reassessment in view of technical advances. Results of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy trials are subject to criticism. Most trials are retrospective, used different chemotherapy protocols and did not have uniform end point assessment. Bladder-preservation strategies can offer cures for a selection of subpopulations, but these patient groups have yet to be clearly defined. Developments in molecular biology are exciting, and their potential application is pending translational research. To be meaningful and useful, future trials that involve additional or alternative modalities should be prospective, randomized and adequately powered.
Collapse
|
10
|
Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P. Bladder-sparing therapy for muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008; 5:368-75. [PMID: 18560383 DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro1145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2007] [Accepted: 04/22/2008] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radical cystectomy is the treatment of choice for nonmetastatic, muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer. Several researchers have proposed the use of a bladder-sparing approach in carefully selected patients. Strict selection criteria and close follow-up are needed for bladder-preservation protocols. Although repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumors or partial cystectomy might be offered to high-risk patients, combined protocols with transurethral resection of bladder tumors and chemotherapy, with or without additional radiotherapy, seem to provide the best results, with 5-year survival rates of about 50%. Even if the chance of preserving the bladder is appealing, and despite evidence of some promising results, these protocols should still be considered investigative because, as yet, there are no randomized trials available that compare cystectomy with bladder-sparing surgery.
Collapse
|
11
|
Nieuwenhuijzen JA, Pos F, Moonen LMF, Hart AAM, Horenblas S. Survival after Bladder-Preservation with Brachytherapy versus Radical Cystectomy; A Single Institution Experience. Eur Urol 2005; 48:239-45. [PMID: 16005375 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2004] [Accepted: 03/22/2005] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term survival following brachytherapy and following cystectomy of patients with invasive bladder cancer treated in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1988 and 2000 108 patients with solitary, organ confined T1-T2 invasive bladder cancer of < or = 5 cm were treated with a transurethral resection, and a course of external beam radiotherapy (30 Gy) followed by 40 Gy brachytherapy. The overall and disease specific survival rates of these patients are compared with those of 77 patients with T1-T2 invasive bladder cancer treated with cystectomy between 1988-2003. RESULTS The 5/10 year overall survival rates were 62%/50% after brachytherapy and 67%/58% after cystectomy (p = 0.67). The 5/10 year disease specific survival rates were 73%/67% after brachytherapy and 72%/72% after cystectomy (p = 0.28). When adjusted for age, multiplicity, T-stage, N-stage and grade, the 5/10 year overall survival rates were 65%/53% after brachytherapy and 62%/51% after cystectomy, respectively. The adjusted disease specific survival rates were 75%/70% after brachytherapy and 66%/66% after cystectomy. CONCLUSIONS This study does not provide evidence regarding survival against the use of bladder preservation with brachytherapy for patients with solitary, T1-T2 invasive bladder cancer of < or = 5 cm diameter, seeking bladder-sparing alternatives to radical cystectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Nieuwenhuijzen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|