1
|
Wallner K, Kearney KE, Tiwana J, Pristera N, Kim EY, Azzalini L, Sandison G, Lombardi WL, Don C, Kim M. Increased prescription dose for large vessel intravascular brachytherapy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:1034-1039. [PMID: 37855145 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most randomized studies testing the effectiveness of IVBT were limited to vessels less than 4 mm diameter. In fact, it is now common to treat vessels larger than 4 mm. Accordingly, the authors instituted a prescription dose increase to 34 Gy at 2 mm from source center for vessels greater than 4.0 mm. The increase in prescription dose to 34 Gy at 2 mm from center is substantial, being 50% higher than the conventional maximum of 23 Gy. AIM To take a close look at group of patients treated to 34 Gy, and for whom follow-up angiograms are available. METHODS Ten patients treated for ISR with a prescription dose of 34 Gy and for whom follow-up angiograms were available were studied. Beta-radiation brachytherapy was performed with a Novoste Beta-Cath System using a strontium-90 (beta) source (Best Vascular, Springfield, VA). Source lengths of 40 or 60 mm were used. A dose of 34 Gy was prescribed at 2 mm from the source center. RESULTS Patients were re-catheterized from 2 to 21 months (median: 16 months) following IVBT, all for symptoms suggested of restenosis. All patients had some degree of ISR of the target vessel, but no IVBT-treated vascular segment showed angiographic signs of degeneration, dissection or aneurysm. CONCLUSION The authors' clinical impression, along with detailed review of the 10 cases, suggest that using a 34 Gy prescription dose at 2 mm from source center does not result in increased toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kent Wallner
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Kathleen E Kearney
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jasleen Tiwana
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nicole Pristera
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Edward Y Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Lorenzo Azzalini
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - George Sandison
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - William L Lombardi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Creighton Don
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Minsun Kim
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lauder L, da Costa BR, Ewen S, Scholz SS, Wijns W, Lüscher TF, Serruys PW, Edelman ER, Capodanno D, Böhm M, Jüni P, Mahfoud F. Randomized trials of invasive cardiovascular interventions that include a placebo control: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2021; 41:2556-2569. [PMID: 32666097 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 04/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The difference in the benefit of invasive cardiovascular interventions compared with placebo controls has not been analysed systematically. METHODS AND RESULTS MEDLINE and Web of Science were searched through 29 March 2020. Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of invasive cardiovascular interventions (including catheter-based interventions and pacemaker-like devices) investigating predefined primary outcomes were included. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios were calculated for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively. Meta-regression analyses were performed to assess whether estimates of treatment effects were associated with methodological characteristics of trials. Thirty trials, including 4102 patients, were analysed. The overall risk of bias was judged to be low in only 43% of the trials. Ten trials (33%) demonstrated statistically significant superiority of invasive interventions over placebo controls for the respective predefined primary outcomes. In almost half of the 16 trials investigating continuous predefined primary outcomes, the SMD between the active and placebo procedure indicated a small (n = 4) to moderate (n = 3) treatment effect of active treatment over placebo. In contrast, one trial indicated a small treatment effect in favour of the placebo procedure. In the remaining trials, there was no relevant treatment effect of active treatment over placebo. In trials with a protocol-mandated stable and symmetrical use of co-interventions, the superiority of active procedures vs. invasive placebo procedures was significantly larger as compared with trials with frequent or unbalanced changes in co-interventions (P for interaction 0.027). CONCLUSIONS The additional treatment effect of invasive cardiovascular interventions compared with placebo controls was small in most trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Lauder
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 41.1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Bruno R da Costa
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.,Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstraße 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sebastian Ewen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 41.1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Sean S Scholz
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 41.1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - William Wijns
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Medicine and CURAM, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Thomas F Lüscher
- Center for Molecular Cardiology, Schlieren Campus, University of Zürich, Wagistrasse 12, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.,Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital Trust, Imperial College London, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, UK
| | - Patrick W Serruys
- The National Lung and Heart Institute, Imperial College London, Dovehouse St, Chelsea, London SW3 6LY, UK
| | - Elazer R Edelman
- Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.,Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Davide Capodanno
- Division of Cardiology, C.A.S.T., P.O. "G. Rodolico", Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele", University of Catania, Via S. Citelli, 31 Catania, Italy
| | - Michael Böhm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 41.1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6, Canada
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Kirrberger Str., Gebäude 41.1, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.,Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sauter A, Landers A, Dittmann H, Pritzkow M, Wiesinger B, Bayer M, Bantleon R, Schmehl J, Claussen CD, Kehlbach R. A dual-inhibition study on vascular smooth muscle cells with meclofenamic acid and β-irradiation for the prevention of restenosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2011; 22:623-9. [PMID: 21414804 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2009] [Revised: 11/22/2010] [Accepted: 12/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Restenosis is still one of the major limitations after angioplasty. A therapeutic treatment combining β-irradiation and pharmacologic cyclooxygenase-2 inhibition was employed to study the impact on vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs). MATERIALS AND METHODS The effects of meclofenamic acid in combination with yttrium-90 ((90)Y) on cell growth, clonogenic activity, cell migration, and cell cycle distribution of human aortic SMCs were investigated. Treatment was sustained over a period of 4 days and recovery of cells was determined until day 20 after initiation. The hypothesis was that there is no difference between control and treated groups. RESULTS A dose-dependent growth inhibition was observed in single and combined treatment groups for meclofenamic acid and β-irradiation. Cumulative radiation dosage of 8 Gy completely inhibited colony formation. This was also observed for 200 μM meclofenamic acid alone or in combination with minor β-irradiation dosages. Results of the migration tests showed also a dose dependency with additive effects of combined therapy. Meclofenamic acid 200 μM alone and with cumulative β-irradiation dosages resulted in an increased G2/M-phase share. CONCLUSIONS Incubating human SMCs with meclofenamic acid and (90)Y for a period of 4 d (ie, 1.5 half-life times) resulted in an effective inhibition of smooth muscle cell proliferation, colony formation, and migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Sauter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard-Karls-University, WaldhÖrnlestr. 22, 72072 Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Szotowski B, Antoniak S, Goldin-Lang P, Tran QV, Pels K, Rosenthal P, Bogdanov VY, Borchert HH, Schultheiss HP, Rauch U. Antioxidative treatment inhibits the release of thrombogenic tissue factor from irradiation- and cytokine-induced endothelial cells. Cardiovasc Res 2007; 73:806-12. [PMID: 17266944 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2006] [Revised: 12/18/2006] [Accepted: 12/21/2006] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the antioxidants pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on the ionizing radiation (IR)- and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) induced tissue factor (TF) expression and its release from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). METHODS HUVECs were irradiated with a single dose of either 5 Gy or 10 Gy and stimulated with TNF-alpha (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of PDTC and NAC, respectively. Quantitative real-time PCR, ELISA, and TF activity measurements were performed, including TF activity in the supernatant. Apoptosis was detected by flow cytometric active caspase-3 measurement and formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by chemiluminescence. RESULTS We demonstrated a thus far uninvestigated persistent induction of TF expression in HUVECs after treatment with IR and TNF-alpha. Combined stimulation with IR and TNF-alpha led to an immense shedding of microparticle-associated TF which was positively correlated with apoptosis and ROS formation. Antioxidative pre-treatment reduced not only apoptosis and ROS formation, but also the release of thrombogenic microparticles. CONCLUSIONS Antioxidative treatment inhibited apoptosis and shedding of microparticles, thereby reducing thrombogenicity. Thus, antioxidants may help to prevent late thrombosis after antiproliferative treatment when used in combination with anticoagulants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Szotowski
- Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schukro C, Syeda B, Kirisits C, Schmid R, Pichler P, Pokrajac B, Lang I, Pötter R, Glogar D. Randomized comparison between intracoronary β-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis. Radiother Oncol 2007; 82:18-23. [PMID: 16971011 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2006] [Revised: 08/10/2006] [Accepted: 08/21/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients. RESULTS Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure. CONCLUSIONS Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Schukro
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|