1
|
Yoshida M, Yoshimura RI, Notake R, Shinjo H, Miyaura K, Kuwayama T, Kawanaka T, Shien T, Yoshio K, Shiga T, Kaneyasu Y, Nakagawa T, Kubota K, Nakamura S, Itami J. Feasibility of accelerated partial breast irradiation with strut-adjusted volume implant brachytherapy in Japan focusing on dosimetry and acute toxicity: a Japanese multi-institutional prospective study. Breast Cancer 2024; 31:75-83. [PMID: 37865624 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-023-01513-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Japanese multi-institutional prospective study was initiated to investigate the effectiveness and safety of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) brachytherapy, with subjects registered between 2016 and 2021. Herein, we report the preliminary results on the feasibility of this treatment modality in Japan, focusing on the registration process, dosimetry, and acute toxicities. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary registration was conducted before breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and the eligibility criteria included the following: age ≥ 40 years, tumor unifocal and unicentric, ≤ 3 cm in diameter, cN0M0, proven ductal, mucinous, tubular, medullary, or lobular carcinoma by needle biopsy. Secondary registration was conducted after BCS had been performed leaving a cavity for device implantation and pathological evaluations, and the eligibility criteria were as follows: negative surgical margin, tumor ≤ 3 cm in diameter on gross pathological examination, histologically confirmed ductal, mucinous, tubular medullary, colloid, or lobular carcinoma, pN0, L0V0, no extensive ductal component, no initiation of chemotherapy within 2 weeks of the brachytherapy APBI planning with SAVI was performed for the patients successfully entered in the study by the secondary registration process, and the treatment was administered at the dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions administered twice daily. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2021, 64 women were enrolled in the study through primary registration, of which 19 were excluded from the secondary registration process, and in one, it was deemed impossible to comply with the dose constraints established during treatment planning. After the exclusion of these latter 20 patients, we treated the remaining 44 patients by APBI with SAVI. The dose constraints could be adhered to in all the patients, but re-planning was necessitated in 3 patients because of applicator movement during the treatment period. Grade 2 acute toxicities were observed in 18% of all patients, but more severe acute toxicities than Grade 2 were not observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSION APBI with SAVI brachytherapy is feasible in Japan from the aspects of compliance with dose constraints and frequency of acute toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Radiology, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-22-36 Ohashi, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo-Ichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ryoichi Notake
- Radiology Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidenori Shinjo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunori Miyaura
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kuwayama
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Kawanaka
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Tokushima University, 3-18-15 Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Tadahiko Shien
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-shi, Okayama, Japan
| | - Kotaro Yoshio
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama City, Okayama, Japan
| | - Toshiko Shiga
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, 10-15 Fumizono-cho, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuko Kaneyasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, 4-14-17 Okinogami-cho, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Nakagawa
- Department of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunori Kubota
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Minamikoshigaya 2-1-50, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Seigo Nakamura
- Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- ShinMatsudo Accuracy Radiation Therapy Center, ShinMatsudo Central General Hospital, Matsudo 1-380, Matsudo City, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kubo T, Kurokawa C, Inoue T, Fujii T, Miyaura K, Shinjo H, Kagami Y, Shikama N. Analysis of applicator displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation using a strut-based design brachytherapy applicator. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:655-664. [PMID: 37455152 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to identify factors associated with strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) displacement in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using a SAVI device. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography scans taken at the time of treatment planning and immediately before treatment in 61 patients (median age; 55 years, range; 40-85) treated with SAVI and determined the amount of SAVI displacement that occurred between the time from planning to the treatment. The displacement was calculated for the CT axis and SAVI axis, which is related to the SAVI structure. To investigate the cause of the displacement, multivariate analysis was performed on the calculated standard deviation and the insertion angle of SAVI with respect to the sternum in each cross-section, breast density, amount of air around the SAVI, and SAVI length inside the patient to obtain the β coefficient (p-value). RESULTS On the CT coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in the lateral (β coefficient:0.255-0.483) and rotational directions (β coefficient:0.341). On the SAVI coordinate system, positive correlations were observed between the SAVI insertion angle and air volume in all lateral (β coefficient:0.270-0.354) and rotational directions (β coefficient:0.294). A negative correlation was observed between the SAVI length inside the patient and the rotational direction (β coefficient: -0.262). CONCLUSION SAVI insertion angle, the amount of the air outside SAVI and SAVI insertion length are factors which affect the displacement of the applicator. From the results, the applicator displacement and rotation must be <3 mm and 10o in order to meet all the dose criteria. Thus, we should be aware of these factors during insertion of the device to avoid the problem in treatment delivery for the APBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tadashi Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiotechnology, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Chie Kurokawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Inoue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoki Fujii
- Department of Radiotechnology, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunori Miyaura
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Showa University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hidenori Shinjo
- Division of radiation oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Kagami
- Division of radiation oncology, Department of Radiology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoto Shikama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim H, Hieken TJ, Abraha F, Jakub JW, Corbin KS, Furutani KM, Boughey JC, Stish BJ, Deufel CL, Degnim AC, Shumway DA, Ahmed SK, Piltin MA, Sandhu NP, Conners AL, Ruddy KJ, Mutter RW, Park SS. Long-term outcomes of intraoperatively-placed applicator brachytherapy for rapid completion of breast conserving treatment: An analysis of a prospective registry data. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100639. [PMID: 37251618 PMCID: PMC10212787 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose To evaluate the long-term outcome of accelerated partial breast irradiation utilizing intraoperatively placed applicator-based brachytherapy (ABB) in early-stage breast cancer. Materials and methods From our prospective registry, 223 patients with pTis-T2, pN0/pN1mic breast cancer were treated with ABB. The median treatment duration including surgery and ABB was 7 days. The prescribed doses were 32 Gy/8 fx BID (n = 25), 34 Gy/10 fx BID (n = 99), and 21 Gy/3 fx QD (n = 99). Endocrine therapy (ET) adherence was defined as completion of planned ET or ≥ 80% of the follow-up (FU) period. Cumulative incidence of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) was estimated and influencing factors for IBTR-free survival rate (IBTRFS) were analyzed. Results 218/223 patients had hormone receptor-positive tumors, including 38 (17.0%) with Tis and 185 (83.0%) with invasive cancer. After a median FU of 63 months, 19 (8.5%) patients had recurrence [17 (7.6%) with an IBTR]. Rates of 5-year IBTRFS and DFS were 92.2% and 91.1%, respectively. The 5-year IBTRFS rates were significantly higher for post-menopausal women (93.6% vs. 66.4%, p = 0.04), BMI < 30 kg/m2 (97.4% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.02), and ET-adherence (97.5% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.02). IBTRFS did not differ with dose regimens. Conclusions Postmenopausal status, BMI < 30 kg/m2, and ET- adherence predicted favorable IBTRFS. Our results highlight the importance of careful patient selection for ABB and encouragement of ET compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University of School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Feven Abraha
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James W. Jakub
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Bradley J. Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Amy C. Degnim
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dean A. Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Mara A. Piltin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Nicole P. Sandhu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Amy L. Conners
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Robert W. Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean S. Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Itami J. Modern development of high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:490-501. [PMID: 32134450 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2000] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Brachytherapy is an invasive therapy with placement of radiation source into or near the tumor. The difference between planning target volume and clinical target volume is minimal, and the dose out of the tumor reduces rapidly due to the inverse-square law. High-dose-rate brachytherapy enables three-dimensional image guidance, and currently, tumor dose as well as doses of the surrounding normal structures can be evaluated accurately. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is the utmost precision radiation therapy even surpassing carbon ion therapy. Biological disadvantages of high-dose rate have been overcome by the fractional irradiation. High-dose-rate brachytherapy is indispensable in the definitive radiation therapy of cervical cancer. Also in prostate cancer and breast cancer, high-dose-rate brachytherapy plays a significant role. Brachytherapy requires techniques and skills of radiation oncologists at the time of invasive placement of the radiation source into the tumor area. Education of young radiation oncologists is most urgent and important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iijima K, Okamoto H, Takahashi K, Aikawa A, Wakita A, Nakamura S, Nishioka S, Harada K, Notake R, Sugawara A, Yoshimura R, Kunieda E, Itami J. Inter-fractional variations in the dosimetric parameters of accelerated partial breast irradiation using a strut-adjusted volume implant. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2020; 61:123-133. [PMID: 31665490 PMCID: PMC7022137 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 07/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate inter-fractional dosimetric variations for high-dose rate breast brachytherapy using a strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI). For the nine patients included, dosimetric constraints for treatment were as follows: for the planning target volume for evaluation (PTV_Eval), the volume receiving 90, 150 and 200% of the prescribed dose (V90%,150%,200%) should be >90%, ≤50 cm3 and ≤20 cm3, respectively; the dose covering 1 cm3 (D1cc) of the organs at risk should be ≤110% of the prescribed dose; and the air volume should be ≤10% of PTV_Eval. Differences in V90%,150%,200%, D1cc and air volume ($\Delta V$ and $\Delta D$) as inter-fractional dosimetric variations and SAVI displacements were measured with pretreatment and planning computed tomography (CT) images. Inter-fractional dosimetric variations were analyzed for correlations with the SAVI displacements. The patients were divided into two groups based on the distance of the SAVI from the surface skin to assess the relationship between the insertion position of the SAVI and dosimetric parameters. The median ΔV90%,150%,200% for the PTV_Eval in all patients was -0.3%, 0.2 cm3 and 0.2 cm3, respectively. The median (range) ΔD1cc for the chest wall and surface skin was -0.8% (-18.9 to 9.4%) and 0.3% (-7.6 to 5.3%), respectively. SAVI displacement did not correlate with inter-fractional dosimetric variations. In conclusion, the dose constraints were satisfied in most cases. However, there were inter-fractional dosimetric changes due to SAVI displacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kotaro Iijima
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara Shimokasuya 143, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Ako Aikawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Akihisa Wakita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Shie Nishioka
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Ken Harada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara Shimokasuya 143, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Notake
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Ushima 1-5-45, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Akimoto Sugawara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara Shimokasuya 143, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Yoshimura
- Department of Radiation Therapeutics and Oncology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Ushima 1-5-45, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan
| | - Etsuo Kunieda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokai University, School of Medicine, Isehara Shimokasuya 143, Kanagawa, 259-1193, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Medical Physics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chuo-ku, Tsukiji 5-1-1, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kallis K, Ziegler M, Lotter M, Kreppner S, Strnad V, Fietkau R, Bert C. Is adaptive treatment planning in multi-catheter interstitial breast brachytherapy necessary? Radiother Oncol 2019; 141:304-311. [PMID: 31530431 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 08/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For 55 patients treated with interstitial multi-catheter breast brachytherapy the need for adaptive treatment planning was assessed. METHODS AND MATERIALS For all patients a treatment planning computed tomography (CT) and a follow-up CT were acquired and used for the retrospective evaluation. Keeping dwell time and dwell positions constant, the treatment plan assessed directly after catheter implantation was compared to the situation 48 h after implantation. Both manual catheter reconstructions, based on the planning and follow-up CT, were rigid registered to each other and the resulting deviations analyzed, like the difference between corresponding dwell positions (ΔDP) or the discrete Fréchet distance. Further, the dosimetric changes, e.g., coverage index (ΔCI), conformal index (ΔCOIN) and dose non-uniformity ratio (ΔDNR) were considered for a deformed planning target volume (PTV) and the rigid warped PTV structure. The PTV was deformed according to the vector field estimated between the two acquired CTs. RESULTS Over all patients with rigid aligned CTs a mean ΔDP, ΔCI, ΔCOIN and ΔDNR were determined to 2.41 ± 1.73 mm, 3.10 ± 3.17%, 0.009 ± 0.007 and 0.036 ± 0.040, respectively. Considering the deformed PTV ΔCI was estimated to 5.05 ± 4.14%. CONCLUSION In conclusion, in 4% of the cases re-planning would have been beneficial to ensure the planned dose delivery. Large PTV changes or large DP deviations were found to be the main reasons for dosimetric variations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Marc Ziegler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Lotter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Kreppner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dosimetric feasibility of an anthropomorphic three-dimensional PRESAGE ® dosimeter for verification of single entry hybrid catheter accelerated partial breast brachytherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2018. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396918000171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurposeTo determine the feasibility of an anthropomorphic breast polyurethane-based three-dimensional (3D) dosimeter with cavity to measure dose distributions and skin dose for a commercial strut-based applicator strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI™) 6–1.Materials and methodsAn anthropomorphic breast 3D dosimeter was created with a cavity to accommodate the SAVI™ strut-based device. 2 Gy was prescribed to the breast dosimeter having D95 to planning target volume evaluation (PTV_EVAL) while limiting 125% of the prescribed dose to the skin. Independent dose distribution verification was performed with GAFCHROMIC® EBT2 film. The dose distribution from the 3D dosimeter was compared to the distributions from commercial brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) and film. Point skin doses, line profiles and dose–volume histogram (DVHs) for the skin and PTV_EVAL were compared.ResultsThe maximum difference in skin dose for TPS and the 3D dosimeter was 4% whereas 41% between the TPS and EBT2 film. The maximum dose difference for line profiles between TPS, 3D dosimeter, and film was 4·1%. DVHs of skin and PTV_EVAL for TPS and 3D dosimeter differed by a maximum of 4% at 5 mm depth and skin differed by a maximum 1·5% between TPS and 3D dosimeter. The criterion for gamma analysis comparison was 92·5% at ±5%±3 mm criterion. The TPS demonstrated at least ±5% comparability in predicting dose to the skin, PTV_EVAL and normal breast tissue.Conclusions3D anthropomorphic polyurethane dosimeter with cavity gives comparable results to the TPS dose predictions and GAFCHROMIC® EBT2 film results in the context of HDR brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
8
|
Study on the dose modification factor of strut adjusted volume implant (SAVI) with a 169Yb source using MCNP4C. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2018; 41:445-450. [DOI: 10.1007/s13246-018-0641-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
|
9
|
Sandwall PA, Feng Y, Platt M, Lamba M, Mahalingam S. Evolution of brachytherapy treatment planning to deterministic radiation transport for calculation of cardiac dose. Med Dosim 2018; 43:150-158. [PMID: 29609845 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Brachytherapy was among the first methods of radiotherapy and has steadily continued to evolve. Here we present a brief review of the progression of dose calculation methods in brachytherapy to the current state-of-the art computerized methods for heterogeneity correction. We further review the origin and development of the BrachyVision (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) treatment planning system and evaluate dosimetric results from 12 patients implanted with the strut-assisted volumetric implant (SAVI) applicator (Cianna Medical, Aliso Viejo, CA) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Dosimetric results from plans calculated using homogenous and heterogeneous algorithms have been compared to investigate the impact of heterogeneity corrections. Our study showed large percent difference between mean cardiac doses 11.8 ± 6.2% (p = 0.0007) calculated with and without heterogeneity corrections. Our findings are consistent with those of others, indicating an overestimation of the distal dose to organs-at-risk by traditional methods, especially at interfaces between air and tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yuntao Feng
- OhioHealth-Radiation Oncology, Columbus, Ohio 43214
| | - Michael Platt
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267
| | - Michael Lamba
- College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267
| | - Sudha Mahalingam
- American Brachytherapy Society and American Society for Radiation Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Altman MB, Mooney KE, Edward S, Garcia-Ramirez JL, Dewees TA, Thomas MA, Zoberi I, Zoberi JE. Efficiency of using the day-of-implant CT for planning of SAVI APBI. Brachytherapy 2017; 17:40-49. [PMID: 28869144 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 07/25/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to develop an optimized, efficient workflow for using the day-of-implant (DOI) CT for treatment planning of accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy using the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) device. METHODS AND MATERIALS For 62 consecutive SAVI patients, a DOI CT was acquired and used for treatment planning. A "verification" CT was acquired 24-72 h after implant and immediately before the first fraction, then registered to the DOI CT. If the DOI CT-based plan was no longer optimal, a replan was performed. An array of metrics describing the geometry of the device and its relative position in the patient from the DOI CTs for these patients was collected. These metrics from the DOI CT were evaluated to determine what features could predict for the need to replan before the first treatment fraction. Logistical regression analysis including χ2 tests was used to determine if different factors correlated with replanning. RESULTS Twenty-two of 62 patients (35%) required replanning. Only the presence of splayed struts, where splay was toward the skin, and the use of a nine strut ("8-1") SAVI were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with replanning. Within these individual populations, no additional factors showed a significant statistical correlation for requiring replanning. CONCLUSIONS For strut-based accelerated partial breast irradiation brachytherapy, it was feasible to treat with a plan based on the DOI CT for a majority (65%) of patients. Some factors correlate to needing replanning; recognizing these could be used to optimize treatment workflow for certain patients, increasing clinical efficiency while enhancing the quality of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Altman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
| | - Karen E Mooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sharbacha Edward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | | | - Todd A Dewees
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Maria A Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Imran Zoberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - Jacqueline E Zoberi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Clinical implementation of a novel Double-Balloon single-entry breast brachytherapy applicator. Brachytherapy 2017; 16:1239-1245. [PMID: 28844820 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 07/28/2017] [Accepted: 07/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to describe the clinical utilization of a novel Double-Balloon applicator for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS The Double-Balloon single-entry breast applicator contains a single central treatment catheter, as well as four peripheral catheters that can be differentially loaded to customize radiation dose coverage. An inner balloon is filled with up to 7-30 cm3 of saline to increase separation between the peripheral catheters, and an outer balloon is filled with up to 37-115 cm3 of saline to displace breast tissue from the peripheral catheters. Treatment planning objectives include coverage of the breast planning target volume to a minimum of V90 > 90%, limiting dose heterogeneity such that V200 < 10 cm3 and V150 < 50 cm3, and limiting maximum dose to skin (<100% of prescription dose) and ribs (<145% of prescription dose). RESULTS High-dose-rate APBI was delivered to 11 women using this device (34 Gy in 10 twice daily fractions). The mean V90 was 98.2% (range 94.2-99.4%). The mean skin Dmax with the Double-Balloon applicator was 83.3% (range 75.6-99.5%). The mean breast V200 was 5.8 cm3 (range 2.3-10.2 cm3), and the mean breast V150 was 32.9 cm3 (range 25.0-41.7 cm3). Pretreatment quality assurance was performed using CT prior to each morning fraction and ultrasound prior to each afternoon fraction. CONCLUSIONS The Double-Balloon applicator can be easily introduced into a previously existing brachytherapy program. APBI plans created with this applicator achieve excellent planning target volume coverage, while limiting skin dose and maintaining breast V200 < 10 cm3.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuperman VY, Spradlin GS, Kordomenos J. Effect of applicator rotation on dose distribution in accelerated partial breast irradiation. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa62ae] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
13
|
Isbell A, Dunmore-Griffith J, Abayomi O. Strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in African American women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2017; 162:69-76. [DOI: 10.1007/s10549-016-4091-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2016] [Accepted: 12/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
14
|
Strut-based accelerated partial breast irradiation: Report of treatment results for 250 consecutive patients at 5 years from a multicenter retrospective study. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:780-787. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2016] [Revised: 07/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
15
|
Mooney KE, Altman MB, Edward S, Garcia-Ramirez J, Thomas MA, Zoberi I, DeWees T, Mullen D, Zoberi JE. Accelerated partial breast irradiation dosimetric criteria for the strut-adjusted volume implant. Brachytherapy 2016; 15:616-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
16
|
Holliday EB, Kirsner SM, Thames HD, Mason BE, Nelson CL, Bloom ES. Lower mean heart dose with deep inspiration breath hold-whole breast irradiation compared with brachytherapy-based accelerated partial breast irradiation for women with left-sided tumors. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 7:80-85. [PMID: 28274398 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2016] [Revised: 07/21/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE For left-sided breast cancer, radiation to the heart is a concern. We present a comparison of mean heart and coronary artery biologically effective dose (BED) between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and whole breast irradiation with deep inspiration breath-hold technique (DIBH-WBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 100 patients with left-sided, early-stage breast cancer were identified. Fifty underwent single-entry catheter-based APBI and 50 underwent DIBH-WBI. The heart, left anterior descending/interventricular branch, left main, and right coronary artery were delineated. BEDs were calculated from APBI treatment plans (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy twice daily fractions) and for 4 separate plans generated for each DIBH-WBI patient: 50 Gy in 25 fractions (50/25), 50/25 + 10/5 boost, 40/15, and 40/15 + 10/5 boost. RESULTS BED to the heart and coronary vessels were statistically significantly higher with APBI than with any of the DIBH-WBI dose/fractionation schedules. CONCLUSIONS For women with left-sided early-stage breast cancer, DIBH-WBI resulted in statistically significantly lower mean BED to the heart and coronary vessels compared with APBI. This is likely due to increased physical separation between the heart and tumor bed afforded by the DIBH-WBI technique. Long-term assessment of late effects in these tissues will be required to determine whether these differences are clinically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma B Holliday
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steve M Kirsner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Howard D Thames
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bryan E Mason
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher L Nelson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth S Bloom
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Goggin LM, Descovich M, McGuinness C, Shiao S, Pouliot J, Park C. Dosimetric Comparison Between 3-Dimensional Conformal and Robotic SBRT Treatment Plans for Accelerated Partial Breast Radiotherapy. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2015; 15:437-45. [DOI: 10.1177/1533034615601280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2015] [Accepted: 07/22/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Accelerated partial breast irradiation is an attractive alternative to conventional whole breast radiotherapy for selected patients. Recently, CyberKnife has emerged as a possible alternative to conventional techniques for accelerated partial breast irradiation. In this retrospective study, we present a dosimetric comparison between 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans and CyberKnife plans using circular (Iris) and multi-leaf collimators. Nine patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgery followed by whole breast radiation were included in this retrospective study. The CyberKnife planning target volume (PTV) was defined as the lumpectomy cavity + 10 mm + 2 mm with prescription dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions. Two sets of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans were created, one used the same definitions as described for CyberKnife and the second used the RTOG-0413 definition of the PTV: lumpectomy cavity + 15 mm + 10 mm with prescription dose of 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions. Using both PTV definitions allowed us to compare the dose delivery capabilities of each technology and to evaluate the advantage of CyberKnife tracking. For the dosimetric comparison using the same PTV margins, CyberKnife and 3-dimensional plans resulted in similar tumor coverage and dose to critical structures, with the exception of the lung V5%, which was significantly smaller for 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, 6.2% when compared to 39.4% for CyberKnife-Iris and 17.9% for CyberKnife-multi-leaf collimator. When the inability of 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to track motion is considered, the result increased to 25.6%. Both CyberKnife-Iris and CyberKnife-multi-leaf collimator plans demonstrated significantly lower average ipsilateral breast V50% (25.5% and 24.2%, respectively) than 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (56.2%). The CyberKnife plans were more conformal but less homogeneous than the 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy plans. Approximately 50% shorter treatment times and 50% lower number of delivered monitor units (MU) were achievable with CyberKnife-multi-leaf collimator than with CyberKnife-Iris. The CyberKnife-multi-leaf collimator treatment times were comparable to 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, however, the number of MU delivered was approximately 2.5 times larger. The suitability of 10 + 2 mm margins warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. M. Goggin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - M. Descovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - C. McGuinness
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S. Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - J. Pouliot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - C. Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Comparative dosimetric findings using accelerated partial breast irradiation across five catheter subtypes. Radiat Oncol 2015; 10:160. [PMID: 26227388 PMCID: PMC4521502 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0468-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2015] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with balloon and strut adjusted volume implants (SAVI) show promising results with excellent tumor control and minimal toxicity. Knowing the factors that contribute to a high skin dose, rib dose, and D95 coverage may reduce toxicity, improve tumor control, and help properly predict patient outcomes following APBI. Methods and materials A retrospective analysis of 594 patients treated with brachytherapy based APBI at a single institution from May 2008 to September 2014 was grouped by applicator subtype. Patients were treated to a total of 34 Gy (3.4 Gy x 10 fractions over 5 days delivered BID) targeting a planning target volume (PTV) 1.0 cm beyond the lumpectomy cavity using a high dose rate source. Results SAVI devices had the lowest statistically significant values of DmaxSkin (81.00 ± 29.83), highest values of D90 (101.50 ± 3.66), and D95 (96.09 ± 4.55). SAVI-mini devices had the lowest statistically significant values of DmaxRib (77.66 ± 32.92) and smallest V150 (18.01 ± 3.39). Multi-lumen balloons were able to obtain the smallest V200 (5.89 ± 2.21). Strut-based applicators were more likely to achieve a DmaxSkin and a DmaxRib less than or equal to 100 %. The effect of PTV on V150 showed a strong positive relationship (p < .001). PTV and DmaxSkin showed a weak negative relationship in multi-lumen applicators (p = .016) and SAVI-mini devices (p < .001). PTV and DmaxRib showed a weak negative relationship in multi-lumen applicators (p = .009), SAVI devices (p < .001), and SAVI-mini devices (p < .001). Conclusion PTV volume is strongly correlated with V150 in all devices and V200 in strut based devices. Larger PTV volumes result in greater V150 and V200, which could help predict potential risks for hotspots and resulting toxicities in these devices. PTV volume is also weakly negatively correlated with max skin dose and max rib dose, meaning that as the PTV volumes increase one can expect slightly smaller max skin and rib doses. Strut based applicators are significantly more effective in keeping skin and rib dose constraints under 125 and 100 % when compared to any balloon based applicator.
Collapse
|
19
|
Trifiletti DM, Romano KD, Showalter SL, Reardon KA, Libby B, Showalter TN. Accelerated partial breast irradiation with brachytherapy: patient selection and technique considerations. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2015; 7:211-21. [PMID: 26251627 PMCID: PMC4524268 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s55860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) through breast brachytherapy is a relatively recent development in breast radiotherapy that has gained international favor because of its reduction in treatment duration and normal tissue irradiation while maintaining favorable cancer-specific and cosmetic outcomes. Despite the fact that several large national trials have not reported final results yet, many providers are currently offering APBI to select patients and APBI is listed as a treatment option for selecting patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Multiple consensus guidelines exist in selecting patients for APBI, some with conflicting recommendations. In this review, the existing patient selection guidelines are reported, compared, and critiqued, grouping them in helpful subcategories. Unique patient and technical selection factors for APBI with brachytherapy are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kara D Romano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Shayna L Showalter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Kelli A Reardon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Bruce Libby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de la Puente P, Azab AK. Delivery systems for brachytherapy. J Control Release 2014; 192:19-28. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2014] [Revised: 06/26/2014] [Accepted: 06/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
21
|
The importance of the implant quality in APBI - Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 5:227-31. [PMID: 24474972 PMCID: PMC3899638 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2013.39365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2013] [Revised: 12/04/2013] [Accepted: 12/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This study includes four years of our clinical trials to improve implant quality in multicatheter accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The progress in dosimetric and volumetric parameters of the treatment plans was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-one women, for whom treatment plans were made based on three dimensional imaging, were selected for the study. To evaluate progress made in our APBI procedure, following parameters and indices were taken into account: percentage of the target volume receiving the reference dose (PTVref), minimum dose in the target volume expressed as a percentage of reference dose (PTVmin), dose homogeneity index (DHI), and conformity index (COIN). Additionally, the plan quality index was calculated for every group as the sum of mean values of four evaluated parameters. PTVref have increased from the mean value of 83.4% at the beginning to recent 94.8%. The maximum value equals to 95.4%. The same trend can be observed with PTVmin value, which has been improved from 51.7% to 70.1%, maximally. DHI and COIN mean values present similar progress. DHI value increased from 0.53 level to 0.68, and COIN from 0.58 in 2009 to 0.74. Plan quality index has increased from 2.46 in 2009 to 3.06, recently. The implant quality is crucial for the accurate dose distribution. This paper shows the progress that was made in APBI procedure to improve implant quality. Nowadays, our implant technique is based on three-dimensional CT imaging results in acceptable dose distributions.
Collapse
|
22
|
Harmon JF, Rice BK. Comparison of planning techniques when air/fluid is present using the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) for HDR-based accelerated partial breast irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013; 14:4442. [PMID: 24257287 PMCID: PMC5714640 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i6.4442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Revised: 07/15/2013] [Accepted: 07/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The presence of air/fluid surrounding implantable devices used for partial breast irradiation may significantly impact dose coverage to at-risk tissue. Of the 67 total patients retrospectively evaluated for this study, 32 (48%) had greater than 1 cc volume of air/fluid extending outside of the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) device surface and were selected for comparison of planning approaches. The planning approaches utilized two different definitions of PTV_EVAL. One definition of a PTV_EVAL (PTV_EVALSAVI) was based on expanding 1 cm beyond the SAVI device only while accounting for the air/fluid using the NSABP Protocol B-39/RTOG Protocol 0413. The second PTV_EVAL definition (PTV_EVALCAV) was based on expanding 1 cm beyond the cavity (SAVI device plus air/fluid volume). The results indicate use of the B-39 formalism to account for air/fluid displacing the PTV_EVAL may overestimate the dose coverage to the at-risk tissue, especially for large contiguous volumes of air/fluid. Using the SAVI device to optimize dose covering the PTV_EVALCAV volume surrounding the cavity improves dosimetric coverage to at-risk tissue by 11.3% and 8.7% for V100 and V90, respectively, while the average V150 and V200 indices for PTV_EVALCAV increased by 9.1 cc and 5.0cc, respectively, and the average maximum rib and skin doses increased by 11.1% and 6.1%, respectively. The maximum skin dose, rib dose, V150, and V200 all met the planning objectives despite any increase in these parameters.
Collapse
|
23
|
Can we improve the dose distribution for single or multi-lumen breast balloons used for Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation? J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 5:134-8. [PMID: 24143147 PMCID: PMC3797409 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2013.37776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Revised: 08/10/2013] [Accepted: 09/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of the study was to verify dose distribution parameters for multi-lumen, and artificially created single-lumen balloon applicator used for the same patient with two optimization algorithms: inverse planning simulated annealing (IPSA) and dose point optimization with distance option. Material and methods Group of 24 patients with multi-lumen balloon applied were investigated. Each patient received 10 fractions of 3.4 Gy (2 fractions daily). For every patient, four treatment plans were prepared. Firstly, for five-lumen balloon optimized with IPSA algorithm and optimization parameters adjusted for each case. Secondly, for the same applicator optimized with dose point optimization and distant option. Two other plans were prepared for single-lumen applicator, created by removing four peripheral lumens, optimized with both algorithms. Results The highest D95 parameter was obtained for plans optimized with IPSA algorithm, mean value 99.3 percent of prescribed dose, and it was significantly higher than plans optimized with dose point algorithm (mean = 83.50%, p < 0.0001), IPSA single-lumen balloon plan (mean = 83.50%, p = 0.0037) and optimized to dose point single-lumen balloon (mean = 85.51%, p < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences concerning maximum doses distributed to skin surface for neither application nor optimization method. Volumes receiving 200% of prescribed dose in PTV were higher for multi-lumen balloon dose point optimized plans (mean = 8.78%), than for other plans (IPSA multi-lumen balloon plan: mean = 7.37%, p < 0.0001, single-lumen IPSA: mean = 7.20%, p < 0.0001, single-lumen dose point: mean = 7.19%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Basing on performed survey, better dose distribution parameters are obtained for patients with multi-lumen balloon applied and optimized using IPSA algorithm with individualized optimization parameters.
Collapse
|
24
|
Stewart AJ, Hepel JT, O’Farrell DA, Devlin PM, Price LL, Dale RG, Wazer DE. Equivalent uniform dose for accelerated partial breast irradiation using the MammoSite applicator. Radiother Oncol 2013; 108:232-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2012] [Revised: 06/18/2013] [Accepted: 06/26/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
25
|
Gifford KA, Pacha O, Hebert AA, Nelson CL, Kirsner SM, Ballo MT, Bloom ES. A new paradigm for calculating skin dose. Brachytherapy 2013; 12:114-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2012.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2012] [Revised: 05/23/2012] [Accepted: 05/24/2012] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
26
|
On the feasibility of treating to a 1.5 cm PTV with a commercial single-entry hybrid applicator in APBI breast brachytherapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2013; 4:29-33. [PMID: 23346137 PMCID: PMC3551370 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2012.27949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2011] [Revised: 01/20/2012] [Accepted: 02/04/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate and determine whether 30 patients previously treated with the SAVI™ device could have been treated to a PTV_EVAL created with a 1.5 cm expansion. This determination was based upon dosimetric parameters derived from current recommendations and dose-response data. Material and methods Thirty patients were retrospectively planned with PTV_EVALs generated with a 1.5 cm expansion (PTV_EVAL_1.5). Plans were evaluated based on PTV_EVAL_1.5 coverage (V90, V95, V100), skin and rib maximum doses (0.1 cc maximum dose as a percentage of prescription dose), as well as V150 and V200 for the PTV_EVAL_1.5. The treatment planning goal was to deliver ≥90% of the prescribed dose to ≥90% of the PTV_EVAL_1.5. Skin and rib maximum doses were to be ≤125% of the prescription dose and preferably ≤100% of the prescription dose. V150 and V200 were not allowed to exceed 52.5 cc and 21 cc, respectively. Plans not meeting the above criteria were recomputed with a 1.25 cm expanded PTV_EVAL and re-evaluated. Results Based on the above dose constraints, 30% (9/30) of the patients evaluated could have been treated with a 1.5 cm PTV_EVAL. The breakdown of cases successfully achieving the above dose constraints by applicator was: 0/4 (0%) 6-1, 6/15 (40%) 8-1, and 3/11 (27%) 10-1. For these PTV_EVAL_1.5 plans, median V90% was 90.3%, whereas the maximum skin and rib doses were all less than 115.2% and 117.6%, respectively. The median V150 and V200 volumes were 39.2 cc and 19.3, respectively. The treated PTV_EVAL_1.5 was greater in volume than the PTV_EVAL by 41.7 cc, and 60 cc for the 8-1, and 10-1 applicators, respectively. All remaining plans (17) successfully met the above dose constraints to be treated with a 1.25 cm PTV_EVAL (PTV_EVAL_1.25). For the PTV_EVAL_1.25 plans, V90% was 93.7%, and the maximum skin and rib doses were all less than 109.2% and 102.5%, respectively. The median V150 and V200 volumes were 41.2 cc and 19.3, respectively. The treated PTV_EVAL_1.25 was greater in volume than the PTV_EVAL by 16 cc, 24.9 cc, and 33.5 cc for the 6-1, 8-1 and 10-1 applicators, respectively. Conclusions It is dosimetrically possible to treat beyond the currently advised 1.0 cm expanded PTV_EVAL. Most patients should be able to be treated with a 1.25 cm PTV_EVAL and a select group with a 1.5 cm PTV_EVAL. Applicator size appears to determine the ability to expand to a 1.5 cm PTV_EVAL, as smaller devices were not as propitious in this regard. Further studies may identify additional patient groups that would benefit from this approach.
Collapse
|
27
|
Deneve JL, Hoefer RA, Harris EER, Laronga C. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: A Review and Description of an Early North American Surgical Experience with the Intrabeam Delivery System. Cancer Control 2012; 19:295-308. [DOI: 10.1177/107327481201900406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremiah L. Deneve
- Department of Women's Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Richard A. Hoefer
- Dorothy G. Hoefer Comprehensive Breast Center, Sentara Cancer Network, Newport News, Virginia
| | - Eleanor E. R. Harris
- Radiation Oncology Program at the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christine Laronga
- Department of Women's Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Brachytherapy in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) - review of treatment methods. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2012; 4:152-64. [PMID: 23346145 PMCID: PMC3551377 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2012.30682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2012] [Revised: 09/03/2012] [Accepted: 09/06/2012] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast conserving surgery (BCS) with following radiotherapy (EBRT) of the conserved breast became widely accepted in the last decades as the treatment of early invasive breast cancer. In an early stage of breast cancer, research has shown that the area requiring radiation treatment to prevent cancer from local recurrence is the breast tissue that surrounds the area where the initial cancer was removed. Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an approach that treats only the lumpectomy bed with 1-2 cm margin, rather than the whole breast and as a result allows accelerated delivery of the radiation dose in four to five days. Published results of APBI are very promising. It is evident that APBI will play a role in the management of a selected group of early breast cancer. We discuss current status, indications, technical aspects and recently published results of APBI using different brachytherapy techniques.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lu SM, Scanderbeg DJ, Barna P, Yashar W, Yashar C. Evaluation of two intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy devices for irradiating additional and irregularly shaped volumes of breast tissue. Med Dosim 2012; 37:9-14. [PMID: 21458981 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2010.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2010] [Revised: 11/12/2010] [Accepted: 12/08/2010] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
30
|
Cuttino LW. Point: balloon versus strut brachytherapy-which device offers the most dose modulation capability and normal tissue sparing? Brachytherapy 2011; 10:433-5. [PMID: 22051405 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2011.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie W Cuttino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Haie-Meder C, Siebert FA, Pötter R. Image guided, adaptive, accelerated, high dose brachytherapy as model for advanced small volume radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2011; 100:333-43. [PMID: 21963284 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2011] [Accepted: 09/15/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Brachytherapy has consistently provided a very conformal radiation therapy modality. Over the last two decades this has been associated with significant improvements in imaging for brachytherapy applications (prostate, gynecology), resulting in many positive advances in treatment planning, application techniques and clinical outcome. This is emphasized by the increased use of brachytherapy in Europe with gynecology as continuous basis and prostate and breast as more recently growing fields. Image guidance enables exact knowledge of the applicator together with improved visualization of tumor and target volumes as well as of organs at risk providing the basis for very individualized 3D and 4D treatment planning. In this commentary the most important recent developments in prostate, gynecological and breast brachytherapy are reviewed, with a focus on European recent and current research aiming at the definition of areas for important future research. Moreover the positive impact of GEC-ESTRO recommendations and the highlights of brachytherapy physics are discussed what altogether presents a full overview of modern image guided brachytherapy. An overview is finally provided on past and current international brachytherapy publications focusing on "Radiotherapy and Oncology". These data show tremendous increase in almost all research areas over the last three decades strongly influenced recently by translational research in regard to imaging and technology. In order to provide high level clinical evidence for future brachytherapy practice the strong need for comprehensive prospective clinical research addressing brachytherapy issues is high-lighted.
Collapse
|
32
|
Yashar CM, Scanderbeg D, Kuske R, Wallace A, Zannis V, Blair S, Grade E, Swenson VH, Quiet C. Initial Clinical Experience With the Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant (SAVI) Breast Brachytherapy Device for Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation (APBI): First 100 Patients With More Than 1 Year of Follow-Up. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011; 80:765-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2009] [Revised: 01/08/2010] [Accepted: 02/20/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
33
|
Lin R, Tripuraneni P. Radiation therapy in early-stage invasive breast cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2011; 2:101-11. [PMID: 22693401 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-011-0048-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2009] [Accepted: 01/06/2010] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of breast cancer involves a multi-disciplinary approach with radiation therapy playing a key role. Breast-conserving surgery has been an option for women with early-stage breast cancer for over two decades now. Multiple randomized trials now have demonstrated the efficacy of breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy. With the advancements in breast imaging and the successful campaign for early detection of breast cancer, more women today are found to have early-stage small breast cancers. Patient factors (breast size, tumor location, history of prior radiation therapy, preexisting conditions such as collagen vascular disease, age, having prosthetically augmented breasts), pathological factors (margin status, tumor size, presence of extensive intraductal component requiring multiple surgical excisions), as well as patient preference are all taken into consideration prior to surgical management of breast cancer. Whole-breast fractionated radiation therapy between 5 and 7 weeks is considered as the standard of care treatment following breast-conserving surgery. However, new radiation treatment strategies have been developed in recent years to provide alternatives to the conventional 5-7 week whole-breast radiation therapy for some patients. Accelerated partial breast radiation therapy (APBI) was introduced because the frequency of breast recurrences outside of the surgical cavity has been shown to be low. This technique allows treatments to be delivered quicker (usually 1 week, twice daily) to a limited volume. Often times, this treatment involves the use of a brachytherapy applicator to be placed into the surgical cavity following breast-conserving surgery. Accelerated hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation may be another faster way to deliver radiation therapy following breast-conserving surgery. This journal article reviews the role of radiation therapy in women with early-stage breast cancer addressing patient selection in breast-conserving therapy, a review of pertinent trials in breast-conserving therapy, as well as the different treatment techniques available to women following breast-conserving surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Scripps Clinic and Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, CA USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bloom ES, Kirsner S, Mason BE, Nelson CL, Hunt KK, Baumann DP, Gifford KA. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using the strut-adjusted volume implant single-entry hybrid catheter in brachytherapy for breast cancer in the setting of breast augmentation. Brachytherapy 2011; 10:178-83. [PMID: 20719576 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 06/08/2010] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has gained popularity as an alternative to adjuvant whole breast irradiation; however, owing to limitations of delivery devices for brachytherapy, APBI has not been a suitable option for all the patients. This report evaluates APBI using the strut-adjusted volume implant (SAVI) single-entry catheter to deliver brachytherapy for breast cancer in the setting of an augmented breast. METHODS AND MATERIALS The patient previously had placed bilateral subpectoral saline implants; stereotactic core biopsy revealed estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-positive ductal carcinoma in situ of intermediate nuclear grade. The patient underwent needle-localized segmental mastectomy of her left breast; pathologic specimen revealed no residual malignancy. An SAVI 8-1 device was placed within the segmental resection cavity. Treatment consisted of 3.4 Gy delivered twice a day for 5 days for a total dose of 34 Gy. Treatments were delivered with a high-dose-rate (192)Ir remote afterloader. RESULTS Conformance of the device to the lumpectomy cavity was excellent at 99.2%. Dosimetric values of percentage of the planning target volume for evaluation receiving 90% of the prescribed dose, percentage of the planning target volume for evaluation receiving 95% of the prescribed dose, volume receiving 150% of the prescribed dose, and volume receiving 200% of the prescribed dose were 97.1%, 94.6%, 22.7 cc, and 11.6 cc, respectively. Maximum skin dose was 115% of the prescribed dose. The patient tolerated treatment well with excellent cosmetic results, and limited acute and late toxicity at 8 weeks and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Breast augmentation should not be an exclusion criterion for the option of APBI. The SAVI single-entry catheter is another option to successfully complete APBI using brachytherapy for breast cancer in the setting of an augmented breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Bloom
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77081, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Gurdalli S, Kuske RR, Quiet CA, Ozer M. Dosimetric performance of Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant: A new single-entry multicatheter breast brachytherapy applicator. Brachytherapy 2011; 10:128-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2010.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2010] [Revised: 03/26/2010] [Accepted: 03/31/2010] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
36
|
Yashar C, Mahmood U. Strut-adjusted volume implant: a targeted radiation treatment in breast cancer. Future Oncol 2010; 6:1813-6. [PMID: 21142853 DOI: 10.2217/fon.10.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
|
37
|
Richardson SL, Pino R. Dosimetric effects of an air cavity for the SAVI partial breast irradiation applicator. Med Phys 2010; 37:3919-26. [PMID: 20879554 DOI: 10.1118/1.3457328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the dosimetric effect of the air inside the SAVI partial breast irradiation device. METHODS The authors have investigated how the air inside the SAVI partial breast irradiation device changes the delivered dose from the homogeneously calculated dose. Measurements were made with the device filled with air and water to allow comparison to a homogenous dose calculation done by the treatment planning system. Measurements were made with an ion chamber, TLDs, and film. Monte Carlo (MC) simulations of the experiment were done using the EGSnrc suite. The MC model was validated by comparing the water-filled calculations to those from a commercial treatment planning system. RESULTS The magnitude of the dosimetric effect depends on the size of the cavity, the arrangement of sources, and the relative dwell times. For a simple case using only the central catheter of the largest device, MC results indicate that the dose at the prescription point 1 cm away from the air-water boundary is about 9% higher than the homogeneous calculation. Independent measurements in a water phantom with a similar air cavity gave comparable results. MC simulation of a realistic multidwell position plan showed discrepancies of about 5% on average at the prescription point for the largest device. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric effect of the air cavity is in the range of 3%-9%. Unless a heterogeneous dose calculation algorithm is used, users should be aware of the possibility of small treatment planning dose errors for this device and make modifications to the treatment delivery, if necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L Richardson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wilder RB, Curcio LD, Khanijou RK, Eisner ME, Kakkis JL, Chittenden L, Agustin J, Lizarde J, Mesa AV, Macedo JC, Ravera J, Tokita KM. Preliminary Results in 173 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Post-Lumpectomy MammoSite Single-Lumen Brachytherapy or Multi-Catheter Brachytherapy. Breast J 2010; 16:581-6. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2010.00977.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
39
|
Njeh CF, Saunders MW, Langton CM. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI): A review of available techniques. Radiat Oncol 2010; 5:90. [PMID: 20920346 PMCID: PMC2958971 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-5-90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2010] [Accepted: 10/04/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast conservation therapy (BCT) is the procedure of choice for the management of the early stage breast cancer. However, its utilization has not been maximized because of logistics issues associated with the protracted treatment involved with the radiation treatment. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) is an approach that treats only the lumpectomy bed plus a 1-2 cm margin, rather than the whole breast. Hence because of the small volume of irradiation a higher dose can be delivered in a shorter period of time. There has been growing interest for APBI and various approaches have been developed under phase I-III clinical studies; these include multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, balloon catheter brachytherapy, conformal external beam radiation therapy and intra-operative radiation therapy (IORT). Balloon-based brachytherapy approaches include Mammosite, Axxent electronic brachytherapy and Contura, Hybrid brachytherapy devices include SAVI and ClearPath. This paper reviews the different techniques, identifying the weaknesses and strength of each approach and proposes a direction for future research and development. It is evident that APBI will play a role in the management of a selected group of early breast cancer. However, the relative role of the different techniques is yet to be clearly identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher F Njeh
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Mark W Saunders
- Radiation Oncology Department, Texas Oncology Tyler, 910 East Houston Street, Tyler, Texas, USA
| | - Christian M Langton
- Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Raffi JA, Davis SD, Hammer CG, Micka JA, Kunugi KA, Musgrove JE, Winston JW, Ricci-Ott TJ, DeWerd LA. Determination of exit skin dose for 192Ir intracavitary accelerated partial breast irradiation with thermoluminescent dosimeters. Med Phys 2010; 37:2693-702. [PMID: 20632580 DOI: 10.1118/1.3429089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Intracavitary accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has become a popular treatment for early stage breast cancer in recent years due to its shortened course of treatment and simplified treatment planning compared to traditional external beam breast conservation therapy. However, the exit dose to the skin is a major concern and can be a limiting factor for these treatments. Most treatment planning systems (TPSs) currently used for high dose-rate (HDR) 192Ir brachytherapy overestimate the exit skin dose because they assume a homogeneous water medium and do not account for finite patient dimensions. The purpose of this work was to quantify the TPS overestimation of the exit skin dose for a group of patients and several phantom configurations. METHODS The TPS calculated skin dose for 59 HDR 192Ir APBI patients was compared to the skin dose measured with LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Additionally, the TPS calculated dose was compared to the TLD measured dose and the Monte Carlo (MC) calculated dose for eight phantom configurations. Four of the phantom configurations simulated treatment conditions with no scattering material beyond the point of measurement and the other four configurations simulated the homogeneous scattering conditions assumed by the TPS. Since the calibration TLDs for this work were irradiated with 137Cs and the experimental irradiations were performed with 192Ir, experiments were performed to determine the intrinsic energy dependence of the TLDs. Correction factors that relate the dose at the point of measurement (center of TLD) to the dose at the point of interest (basal skin layer) were also determined and applied for each irradiation geometry. RESULTS The TLD intrinsic energy dependence for 192Ir relative to 137Cs was 1.041 +/- 1.78%. The TPS overestimated the exit skin dose by an average of 16% for the group of 59 patients studied, and by 9%-15% for the four phantom setups simulating treatment conditions. For the four phantom setups simulating the conditions assumed by the TPS, the TPS calculated dose agreed well with the TLD and MC results (within 3% and 1%, respectively). The inverse square geometry correction factor ranged from 1.023 to 1.042, and an additional correction factor of 0.978 was applied to account for the lack of charged particle equilibrium in the TLD and basal skin layer. CONCLUSIONS TPS calculations that assume a homogeneous water medium overestimate the exit skin dose for intracavitary APBI treatments. It is important to determine the actual skin dose received during intracavitary APBI to determine the skin dose-response relationship and establish dose limits for optimal skin sparing. This study has demonstrated that TLDs can measure the skin dose with an expanded uncertainty (k = 2) of 5.6% when the proper corrections are applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie A Raffi
- Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Manoharan SR, Rodriguez RR, Bobba VS, Chandrashekar M. Dosimetry evaluation of SAVI-based HDR brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation. J Med Phys 2010; 35:131-6. [PMID: 20927219 PMCID: PMC2936181 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.62127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2009] [Revised: 12/16/2009] [Accepted: 01/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy offers an excellent compact course of radiation due to its limited number of fractions for early-stage carcinoma of breast. One of the recent devices is SAVI (strut-adjusted volume implant), which has 6, 8 or 10 peripheral source channels with one center channel. Each channel can be differentially loaded. This paper focuses on the treatment planning, dosimetry and quality assurance aspects of HDR brachytherapy implant with GammaMed Plus HDR afterloader unit. The accelerated PBI balloon devices normally inflate above 35 cc range, and hence these balloon type devices cannot be accommodated in small lumpectomy cavity sizes. CT images were obtained and 3-D dosimetric plans were done with Brachyvision planning system. The 3-D treatment planning and dosimetric data were evaluated with planning target volume (PTV)_eval V90, V95, V150, V200 skin dose and minimum distance to skin. With the use of the SAVI 6-1 mini device, we were able to accomplish an excellent coverage - V90, V95, V150 and V200 to 98%, 95%, 37 cc (<50 cc volume) and 16 cc (<20 cc volume), respectively. Maximum skin dose was between 73% and 90%, much below the prescribed dose of 34 Gy. The minimum skin distance achieved was 5 to 11 mm. The volume that received 50% of the prescribed radiation dose was found to be lower with SAVI. The multi-channel SAVI-based implants reduced the maximum skin dose to markedly lower levels as compared to other modalities, simultaneously achieving best dose coverage to target volume. Differential-source dwell-loading allows modulation of the radiation dose distribution in symmetric or asymmetric opening of the catheter shapes and is also advantageous in cavities close to chest wall.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - R. Rodney Rodriguez
- Radiation Oncology, 21 Century Oncology-Redding Cancer Treatment Centre, Redding, CA-96001, USA
| | - Vidya S. Bobba
- Radiation Oncology, 21 Century Oncology-Redding Cancer Treatment Centre, Redding, CA-96001, USA
| | - Mukka Chandrashekar
- Department of Physics, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad, AP, India
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Polgár C, Van Limbergen E, Pötter R, Kovács G, Polo A, Lyczek J, Hildebrandt G, Niehoff P, Guinot JL, Guedea F, Johansson B, Ott OJ, Major T, Strnad V. Patient selection for accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery: recommendations of the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) breast cancer working group based on clinical evidence (2009). Radiother Oncol 2010; 94:264-73. [PMID: 20181402 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 444] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2009] [Revised: 01/04/2010] [Accepted: 01/23/2010] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To give recommendations on patient selection criteria for the use of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) based on available clinical evidence complemented by expert opinion. METHODS AND MATERIALS Overall, 340 articles were identified by a systematic search of the PubMed database using the keywords "partial-breast irradiation" and "APBI". This search was complemented by searches of reference lists of articles and handsearching of relevant conference abstracts and book chapters. Of these, 3 randomized and 19 prospective non-randomized studies with a minimum median follow-up time of 4 years were identified. The authors reviewed the published clinical evidence on APBI, complemented by relevant clinical and pathological studies of standard breast-conserving therapy and, through a series of personal communications, formulated the recommendations presented in this article. RESULTS The GEC-ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group recommends three categories guiding patient selection for APBI: (1) a low-risk group for whom APBI outside the context of a clinical trial is an acceptable treatment option; including patients ageing at least 50 years with unicentric, unifocal, pT1-2 (<or=30 mm) pN0, non-lobular invasive breast cancer without the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC) and lympho-vascular invasion (LVI) and with negative surgical margins of at least 2mm, (2) a high-risk group, for whom APBI is considered contraindicated; including patients ageing <or=40 years; having positive margins, and/or multicentric or large (>30 mm) tumours, and/or EIC positive or LVI positive tumours, and/or 4 or more positive lymph nodes or unknown axillary status (pNx), and (3) an intermediate-risk group, for whom APBI is considered acceptable only in the context of prospective clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS These recommendations will provide a clinical guidance regarding the use of APBI outside the context of a clinical trial before large-scale randomized clinical trial outcome data become available. Furthermore they should promote further clinical research focusing on controversial issues in the treatment of early-stage breast carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Csaba Polgár
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Polgár C, Major T, Fodor J, Sulyok Z, Somogyi A, Lövey K, Németh G, Kásler M. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy: 12-year update of a prospective clinical study. Radiother Oncol 2010; 94:274-9. [PMID: 20181401 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2009] [Revised: 01/26/2010] [Accepted: 01/29/2010] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To report the 12-year updated results of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using multicatheter interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-five prospectively selected patients with T1N0-N1mi, nonlobular breast cancer without the presence of an extensive intraductal component and with negative surgical margins were treated with APBI after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using interstitial HDR BT. A total dose of 30.3 Gy (n=8) and 36.4 Gy (n=37) in seven fractions within 4 days was delivered to the tumour bed plus a 1-2 cm margin. The median follow-up time was 133 months for surviving patients. Local and regional control, disease-free (DFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS), as well as late side effects, and cosmetic results were assessed. RESULTS Four (8.9%) ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences were observed, for a 5-, 10-, and 12-year actuarial rate of 4.4%, 9.3%, and 9.3%, respectively. A total of two regional nodal failures were observed for a 12-year actuarial rate of 4.4%. The 12-year DFS, CSS, and OS was 75.3%, 91.1%, and 88.9%, respectively. Grade 3 fibrosis was observed in one patient (2.2%). No patient developed grade 3 teleangiectasia. Fat necrosis requiring surgical intervention occurred in one woman (2.2%). Cosmetic results were rated excellent or good in 35 patients (77.8%). CONCLUSIONS Twelve-year results with APBI using HDR multicatheter interstitial implants continue to demonstrate excellent long-term local tumour control, survival, and cosmetic results with a low-rate of late side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Csaba Polgár
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Scanderbeg D, Yashar C, White G, Rice R, Pawlicki T. Evaluation of three APBI techniques under NSABP B-39 guidelines. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2009; 11:3021. [PMID: 20160680 PMCID: PMC5719777 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i1.3021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2009] [Revised: 06/23/2009] [Accepted: 08/05/2009] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This work compares two accelerated partial breast irradiation modalities, MammoSite brachytherapy and three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), to a new method, SAVI brachytherapy, following NSABP B-39 guidelines. A total of 21 patients treated at UC San Diego with the SAVI device were evaluated in this comparison. 9 of the 21 patients were eligible for all three modalities and were dosimetrically compared evaluating V90, V150, V200, total target volume, maximum skin, lung, and chestwall/rib dose. The target volumes (PTV_EVAL) differed with SAVI having the least total volume at 59.9 cc vs. 71.5 cc and 351.6 cc for MammoSite and 3D-CRT, respectively. The median V90, V150 and V200 for the three modalities were 97.7%, 25.0 cc, 10.4 cc (SAVI) vs. 97.6%, 23.9 cc, 5.0 cc (MammoSite) vs. 100% (V90 3D-CRT). The maximum dose for SAVI, MammoSite, and 3D-CRT, respectively, relative to the prescribed dose, for the: lung was 80.0%, 150.0%, and 104.9%; for rib 108.8%, 225.0%, and 114.7%: for skin 75.0%, 135.0%, and 108.6%. Comparing modalities, PTV coverage varied between 97.6% - 100.0% with more breast tissue covered by 3D-CRT, as expected, given the differences between external beam and brachytherapy. The maximum lung, skin and rib doses were lowest for the SAVI, highlighting its ability to conform to exclude normal tissues. In offering partial breast radiation, the availability of a variety of techniques allows for maximal patient eligibility, and comparison of individual method pros and cons may guide the most appropriate choice for each patient.
Collapse
|
45
|
Initial clinical experience with the Strut-Adjusted Volume Implant brachytherapy applicator for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2009; 8:367-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2009.03.190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2009] [Revised: 03/24/2009] [Accepted: 03/26/2009] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
|
46
|
Wilder RB, Curcio LD, Khanijou RK, Eisner ME, Kakkis JL, Chittenden L, Agustin J, Lizarde J, Mesa AV, Ravera J, Tokita KM. A Contura catheter offers dosimetric advantages over a MammoSite catheter that increase the applicability of accelerated partial breast irradiation. Brachytherapy 2009; 8:373-8. [PMID: 19736045 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2009.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2009] [Revised: 04/17/2009] [Accepted: 04/30/2009] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine whether a Contura catheter (SenoRx, Inc, Aliso Viejo, CA) can increase the applicability of accelerated partial breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS One hundred eighty-two women with early stage breast carcinomas were treated with postlumpectomy brachytherapy using a Contura multilumen catheter (n=45) or a MammoSite single-lumen catheter (Cytyc Corp, Marlborough, MA) (n=137). Hypothetical MammoSite catheter treatment plans were created for the Contura patients. Treatment planning goals were to (1) avoid a radiation "hot spot" in the skin and (2) have only a small air/fluid pocket next to the balloon. RESULTS The median followup was 16 months. Eighty-nine percent (40 of 45) of Contura plans satisfied both treatment planning goals vs. only 36% (16 of 45) of MammoSite plans (p<0.0001). A Contura catheter did not require explantation in 16% (7 of 45) of patients where balloon-to-skin spacing was only 3-6mm and 11% (5 of 45) of patients where there was an air/fluid pocket >10% of the planning target volume for plan evaluation (PTV_EVAL). A MammoSite catheter was explanted in 10% of cases where the minimum balloon-to-skin distance was <7mm and in 13% of cases where there was a large air/fluid pocket next to the balloon. Our incidence rates of acute toxicity with a Contura catheter were similar to those with a MammoSite catheter. CONCLUSIONS A Contura catheter provides important dosimetric advantages over a MammoSite catheter and does not require explantation in cases where balloon-to-skin spacing is only 3-6mm or an air/fluid pocket next to the balloon is >10% of PTV_EVAL.
Collapse
|
47
|
Image-guided brachytherapy sets benchmarks in advanced radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2009; 91:141-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2009] [Accepted: 04/20/2009] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
48
|
Current status and perspectives of brachytherapy for breast cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2009; 14:7-24. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-008-0867-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2008] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|