1
|
Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, Brennan M, Dennis K, Diaz DA, Doung YC, Elmore S, Hertan L, Johnstone C, Jones J, Larrier N, Lo SS, Nguyen QN, Tseng YD, Yerramilli D, Zaky S, Balboni T. External Beam Radiation Therapy for Palliation of Symptomatic Bone Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. [PMID: 38788923 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for palliative external beam radiation therapy (RT) in symptomatic bone metastases. METHODS The ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions regarding palliative RT in symptomatic bone metastases. Based on a systematic review by the Agency for Health Research and Quality, recommendations using predefined consensus-building methodology were established; evidence quality and recommendation strength were also assessed. RESULTS For palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases, RT is recommended for managing pain from bone metastases and spine metastases with or without spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Regarding other modalities with RT, for patients with spine metastases causing spinal cord or cauda equina compression, surgery and postoperative RT are conditionally recommended over RT alone. Furthermore, dexamethasone is recommended for spine metastases with spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Patients with nonspine bone metastases requiring surgery are recommended postoperative RT. Symptomatic bone metastases treated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy in 1 fraction (800 cGy/1 fx), 2000 cGy/5 fx, 2400 cGy/6 fx, or 3000 cGy/10 fx. Spinal cord or cauda equina compression in patients who are ineligible for surgery and receiving conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 1600 cGy/2 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, or 3000 cGy/10 fx. Symptomatic bone metastases in selected patients with good performance status without surgery or neurologic symptoms/signs are conditionally recommended stereotactic body RT over conventional palliative RT. Spine bone metastases reirradiated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, 2400 cGy/6 fx, or 2000 cGy/8 fx; nonspine bone metastases reirradiated with conventional RT are recommended 800 cGy/1 fx, 2000 cGy/5 fx, or 2400 cGy/6 fx. Determination of an optimal RT approach/regimen requires whole person assessment, including prognosis, previous RT dose if applicable, risks to normal tissues, quality of life, cost implications, and patient goals and values. Relatedly, for patient-centered optimization of treatment-related toxicities and quality of life, shared decision making is recommended. CONCLUSIONS Based on published data, the ASTRO task force's recommendations inform best clinical practices on palliative RT for symptomatic bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Alcorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
| | - Ángel Artal Cortés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | | | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dayssy A Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Yee-Cheen Doung
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shekinah Elmore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lauren Hertan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Candice Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Joshua Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, New York
| | - Nicole Larrier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Divya Yerramilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sandra Zaky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Tracy Balboni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
V Bonm A, Taylor LP. Management of Neurologic Complications in Patients with Brain and Spine Tumors. Semin Neurol 2024; 44:53-63. [PMID: 38176424 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Patients with brain and spine tumors represent a distinct population with unique needs. We provide a practical review of neurologic care in this group with an emphasis on familiarizing the general neurologist to the nuances of neuro-oncologic supportive care. We review the management of cerebral edema, steroid dosing, and pertinent side effects. We discuss seizure management, including choice of anticonvulsants, putative antitumor effects, and important seizure mimics like drop attacks. We review the presentation and symptomatology of stroke-like migraine attack after radiation therapy (SMART syndrome). We describe the signs and symptoms that should prompt concern for metastatic spinal cord compression, as well as both acute and definitive treatment options. Finally, we discuss the underappreciated incidence of venous thromboembolic events, particularly in patients with gliomas, and review the data on management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alipi V Bonm
- Department of Neurology, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, Washington
| | - Lynne P Taylor
- Department of Neurology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peters C, Vandewiele J, Lievens Y, van Eijkeren M, Fonteyne V, Boterberg T, Deseyne P, Veldeman L, De Neve W, Monten C, Braems S, Duprez F, Vandecasteele K, Ost P. Incidence and radiotherapy treatment patterns of complicated bone metastases. J Bone Oncol 2024; 44:100519. [PMID: 38179260 PMCID: PMC10765249 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbo.2023.100519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the encouraging results of the SCORAD trial, single fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) remains underused for patients with complicated bone metastases with rates as low as 18-39%. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and treatment patterns of these metastases in patients being referred to a tertiary centre for palliative radiotherapy. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of all bone metastases treated at our centre from January 2013 until December 2017. Lesions were classified as uncomplicated or complicated. Complicated was defined as associated with (impending) fracture, existing spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Our protocol suggests using SFRT for all patients with complicated bone metastases, except for those with symptomatic neuraxial compression and a life expectancy of ≥28 weeks. Results Overall, 37 % of all bone metastases were classified as complicated. Most often as a result of an (impending) fracture (56 %) or spinal cord compression (44 %). In 93 % of cases, complicated lesions were located in the spine, most commonly originating from prostate, breast and lung cancer (60 %). Median survival of patients with complicated bone metastases was 4 months. The use of SFRT for complicated bone metastases increased from 51 % to 85 % over the study period, reaching 100 % for patients with the poorest prognosis. Conclusions Approximately 37 % of bone metastases are classified as complicated with the majority related to (impending) fracture. Patients with complicated bone metastases have a median survival of 4 months and were mostly treated with SFRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cedric Peters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Julie Vandewiele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Yolande Lievens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marc van Eijkeren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tom Boterberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Pieter Deseyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Liv Veldeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Wilfried De Neve
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Chris Monten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sabine Braems
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fréderic Duprez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vandecasteele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital and Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Goutam S, Ghosh S, Stosky J, Tam A, Quirk S, Fairchild A, Wu J, Kerba M. An Analysis of Clinical and Systemic Factors Associated with Palliative Radiotherapy Delivery and Completion at the End of Life in Alberta, Canada. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:10043-10056. [PMID: 38132364 PMCID: PMC10742975 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30120730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is often utilized for symptom control at the end of life. Palliative RT (pRT) may not be taken to completion by patients, thus decreasing clinical benefits and adversely impacting resource allocation. We determined rates of incomplete pRT and examined predictors of non-completion using an electronic questionnaire. Methods: A questionnaire was embedded within the RT electronic prescribing system for all five cancer centers of Alberta, Canada, between 2017 and 2020. Prescribing radiation oncologists (ROs) were tasked with completing the questionnaire. Treatment variables were collected for 2040 patients prescribed pRT. Details on pRT courses delivered and completed were used to determine rates of incomplete RT. Electronic medical records of a subset of 367 patients randomly selected from the 2040 patients were then analyzed to examine for association of non-completion of RT with patient, disease, and therapy-related factors. Results: Overall, 10% of patients did not complete pRT. The rate of single fractions prescribed as a proportion of all RT fractions increased from 18% (pre-2017: pre-study era) to 29% (2017-2020: study era) (p < 0.0001). After conducting multivariate analysis on the overall group, multiple lifetime malignancies (OR:0.64) or increasing the number of pRT fractions (OR:0.08-0.17) were associated with non-completion. Being selected for stereotactic RT (OR:3.75) or survival > 30 days post-RT prescription (OR:2.20-5.02) were associated with greater rates of RT completion. The ROs' estimates of life expectancy at the time of RT prescription were not predictive of RT completion. In the multivariate analysis of the 367-patient subset, the presence of hepatic metastases (OR 2.59), survival 30-59 days (OR 6.61) and survival 90+ days (OR 8.18) post-RT prescription were associated with pRT completion. Only increasing pRT fractionation (OR:0.05-0.2) was associated with non-completion. Conclusion: One in ten patients prescribed pRT did not complete their treatment course. Decreasing pRT fractionation and improving prognostication in patients near the end of life may decrease rates of incomplete RT courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Goutam
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Sunita Ghosh
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Jordan Stosky
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Alexander Tam
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Sarah Quirk
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Alysa Fairchild
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R7, Canada
- Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Jackson Wu
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| | - Marc Kerba
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
- Tom Baker Cancer Center, Calgary, AB T2N 4N2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielsen AM, Storm KS, Laursen MRT, Gram VR, Rechner LA, Ottosson W, Suppli MH, Sibolt P, Behrens CF, Vogelius IR, Persson GF. Interim analysis of patient-reported outcome compliance and dosimetry in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of oesophagus-sparing spinal radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1496-1501. [PMID: 37647380 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2251083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomized clinical trial ESO-SPARE investigates if oesophagus-sparing radiotherapy (RT) can reduce dysphagia in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Patient-reported outcome (PRO) is the only follow-up measure. Due to the fragile patient population, low respondent compliance was anticipated. We performed a planned interim analysis of dosimetry and respondent compliance, to ensure that the protocol requirements were met. METHODS Patients >18 years referred for cervical/thoracic MSCC radiotherapy in 1-10 fractions were included from two centres. Patients were randomized (1:1) to standard RT or oesophagus-sparing RT, where predefined oesophageal dose constraints were prioritized over target coverage. Patients completed a trial diary with daily reports of dysphagia for 5 weeks (PRO-CTC-AE) and weekly quality of life reports for 9 weeks (QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-5L). According to power calculation, 124 patients are needed for primary endpoint analysis. The sample size was inflated to 200 patients to account for the fragile patient population. The co-primary endpoints, peak patient-reported dysphagia, and preserved ability to walk (EQ-5D-5L), are analysed at 5 and 9 weeks, respectively. The interim analysis was conducted 90 days after the inclusion of patient no 100. Respondent compliance was assessed at 5 and 9 weeks. In all RT plans, oesophagus and target doses were evaluated regarding adherence to protocol constraints. RESULTS From May 2021 to November 2022, 100 patients were included. Fifty-two were randomized to oesophagus-sparing RT. In 23% of these plans, oesophagus constraints were violated. Overall, the dose to both target and oesophagus was significantly lower in the oesophagus-sparing plans. Only 51% and 41% of the patients were evaluable for co-primary endpoint analysis at five and nine weeks, respectively. Mortality and hospitalization rates were significantly larger in patients who completed <4 days PRO questionnaires. CONCLUSION Compliance was lower than anticipated and interventions to maintain study power are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Mann Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Katrine Smedegaard Storm
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael R T Laursen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vanja Remberg Gram
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Laura Ann Rechner
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wiviann Ottosson
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Hiul Suppli
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Patrik Sibolt
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus F Behrens
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Ivan R Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gitte F Persson
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rades D, Schild SE. Personalization of Radiation Therapy in the Primary Treatment of Malignant Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (MESCC). Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:148-158. [PMID: 36990632 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
"True" malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is used here to describe a lesion compressing of infiltrating the spinal cord associated with neurologic deficits. Radiotherapy alone is the most common treatment, for which several dose-fractionation regimens are available including single-fraction, short-course and longer-course regimens. Since these regimens are similarly effective regarding functional outcomes, patients with poor survival are optimally treated with short-course or even single-fraction radiotherapy. Longer-course radiotherapy results in better local control of malignant epidural spinal cord compression. Since most in-field recurrences occur 6 months or later, local control is particularly important for longer-term survivors who, therefore, should receive longer-course radiotherapy. It is important to estimate survival prior to treatment, which is facilitated by scoring tools. Radiotherapy should be supplemented by corticosteroids, if safely possible. Bisphosphonates and RANK-ligand inhibitors may improve local control. Selected patients can benefit from upfront decompressive surgery. Identification of these patients is facilitated by prognostic instruments considering degree of compression, myelopathy, radio-sensitivity, spinal stability, post-treatment ambulatory status, and patients' performance status and survival prognoses. Many factors including patients' preferences must be considered when designing personalized treatment regimens.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tseng YD. Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: Fractionation, Recalcification, and Symptom Control. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:139-147. [PMID: 36990631 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Bone is a common site for metastases, which may cause pain and other skeletal-related events (SRE) in patients with advanced cancer. Since the 1980s, prospective clinical trials have demonstrated the high efficacy of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for pain relief from focal, symptomatic lesions. In uncomplicated bone metastases, which include those without pathologic fracture, evidence of cord compression, or prior surgical intervention, improvement or complete pain relief with radiotherapy is as high as 60%, with no difference in efficacy when radiotherapy is delivered in a single or multiple fractions. The ability to treat with a single fraction makes EBRT an attractive therapy even for patients with poor performance status and/or life expectancy. Even in patients with complicated bone metastases (eg cord compression), several randomized trials have demonstrated similar rates of pain relief in addition to improved functional outcomes such as ambulation. In this review, we summarize the role of EBRT for alleviating painful bone metastases and explore its role for other endpoints including functional outcomes, recalcification, and prevention of SREs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda D Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yerramilli D, Johnstone CA. Radiation Therapy at the End of-Life: Quality of Life and Financial Toxicity Considerations. Semin Radiat Oncol 2023; 33:203-210. [PMID: 36990637 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
In patients with advanced cancer, radiation therapy is considered at various time points in the patient's clinical course from diagnosis to death. As some patients are living longer with metastatic cancer on novel therapeutics, radiation oncologists are increasingly using radiation therapy as an ablative therapy in appropriately selected patients. However, most patients with metastatic cancer still eventually die of their disease. For those without effective targeted therapy options or those who are not candidates for immunotherapy, the time frame from diagnosis to death is still relatively short. Given this evolving landscape, prognostication has become increasingly challenging. Thus, radiation oncologists must be diligent about defining the goals of therapy and considering all treatment options from ablative radiation to medical management and hospice care. The risks and benefits of radiation therapy vary based on an individual patient's prognosis, goals of care, and the ability of radiation to help with their cancer symptoms without undue toxicity over the course of their expected lifetime. When considering recommending a course of radiation, physicians must broaden their understanding of risks and benefits to include not only physical symptoms, but also various psychosocial burdens. These include financial burdens to the patient, to their caregiver and to the healthcare system. The burden of time spent at the end-of-life receiving radiation therapy must also be considered. Thus, the consideration of radiation therapy at the end-of-life can be complex and requires careful attention to the whole patient and their goals of care.
Collapse
|
9
|
Multidisciplinary Approach to Spinal Metastases and Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression—A New Integrative Flowchart for Patient Management. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061796. [PMID: 36980681 PMCID: PMC10046378 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic spine disease (MSD) and metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are major causes of permanent neurological damage and long-term disability for cancer patients. The development of MSD is pathophysiologically framed by a cooperative interaction between general mechanisms of bone growth and specific mechanisms of spinal metastases (SM) expansion. SM most commonly affects the thoracic spine, even though multiple segments may be affected concomitantly. The great majority of SM are extradural, while intradural-extramedullary and intramedullary metastases are less frequently seen. The management of patients with SM is particularly complex and challenging, with multiple factors—such as the spinal stability status, primary tumor radio and chemosensitivity, cancer biological burden, patient performance status and comorbidities, and patient’s oncological prognosis—influencing the clinical decision-making process. Different frameworks were developed in order to systematize and support this process. A multidisciplinary, personalized approach, enriched by the expertise of each involved specialty, is crucial. We reviewed the most recent evidence and proposed an updated algorithmic approach to patients with MSD according to the clinical scenario of each patient. A flowchart-based approach offers an evidence-based management of MSD, providing a valuable clinical decision tool in a context of high uncertainty and quick-acting need.
Collapse
|
10
|
Wallace ND, Dunne MT, McArdle O, Small C, Parker I, Shannon AM, Clayton-Lea A, Parker M, Collins CD, Armstrong JG, Gillham C, Coffey J, Fitzpatrick D, Salib O, Moriarty M, Stevenson MR, Alvarez-Iglesias A, McCague M, Thirion PG. Efficacy and toxicity of primary re-irradiation for malignant spinal cord compression based on radiobiological modelling: a phase II clinical trial. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:576-585. [PMID: 36482188 PMCID: PMC9938159 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-02078-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 11/13/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy and safety of primary re-irradiation for MSCC are not known. Our aim was to establish the efficacy and safety of biologically effective dose-based re-irradiation. METHODS Patients presenting with MSCC at a previously irradiated spine segment, and not proceeding with surgical decompression, were eligible. A 3 Gray per fraction experimental schedule (minimum 18 Gy/6 fractions, maximum 30 Gy/10 fractions) was used, delivering a maximum cumulative spinal dose of 100 Gy2 if the interval since the last radiotherapy was within 6 months, or 130 Gy2 if longer. The primary outcome was a change in mobility from week 1 to week 5 post-treatment, as assessed by the Tomita score. The RTOG SOMA score was used to screen for spinal toxicity, and an MRI performed to assess for radiation-induced myelopathy (RIM). RESULTS Twenty-two patients were enroled, of whom eleven were evaluable for the primary outcome. Nine of eleven (81.8%) had stable or improved Tomita scores at 5 weeks. One of eight (12.5%) evaluable for late toxicity developed RIM. CONCLUSIONS Re-irradiation is an efficacious treatment for MSCC. There is a risk of RIM with a cumulative dose of 120 Gy2. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Cancer Trials Ireland (ICORG 07-11); NCT00974168.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mary T Dunne
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Orla McArdle
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
- Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG)), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Imelda Parker
- Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG)), Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoife M Shannon
- Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG)), Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Michael Parker
- Statistics and Data Management Office for Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly ICORG), Clinical Research Support Centre, Belfast, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Jerome Coffey
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Osama Salib
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Michael R Stevenson
- Statistics and Data Management Office for Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly ICORG), Clinical Research Support Centre, Belfast, Ireland
| | | | | | - Pierre G Thirion
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
- Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group (ICORG)), Dublin, Ireland
- Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saito T, Murotani K, Ito K, Nakamura N, Oya N. Bias due to statistical handling of death and reirradiation in the assessment of duration of response after palliative radiotherapy: a scoping review and analysis of clinical data. Br J Radiol 2023; 96:20220398. [PMID: 36125225 PMCID: PMC10997018 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated the influence of handling death and reirradiation on the estimation of duration of response (DOR). METHODS First, we performed a scoping review on methods to assess DOR in palliative radiotherapy. Second, we performed three different analyses on a subgroup of patients from a previously published prospective study. The first analysis was a competing risks analysis considering relapse of pain as the event of interest and death and reirradiation as competing events (Analysis A). The second and third analyses were standard survival analyses where the event of interest was a composite outcome of relapse of pain, death, or reirradiation (Analysis B) and relapse of pain (Analysis C), respectively. RESULTS Death was considered as an event of interest in less than half of the papers, while reirradiation was not considered in any of the studies. Competing risks analysis was not performed in any of the studies. In the analysis of clinical data, competing risks analysis showed that relapse of pain predominated as the cause of the end of response. Median DOR was correctly estimated to be 4.1 months in Analyses A and B, but was overestimated to be 8.1 months in Analysis C. CONCLUSIONS Death and reirradiation should be treated as the events of interest that mark the end of response (as in Analyses A and B) to avoid overestimation of treatment efficacy and an invalid assumption of independent censoring. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The definition of end of response remains inconclusive in the assessment of DOR. We recommend competing risks analysis (Analysis A), by which we can estimate cumulative incidence of each event type and evaluate the necessity of reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuo Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arao Municipal
Hospital, Arao, Japan
| | - Kenta Murotani
- Biostatistics Center, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume
University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kei Ito
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiology, Tokyo
Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome
Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Marianna University
School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Natsuo Oya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kumamoto University
Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
ESTRO ACROP guidelines for external beam radiotherapy of patients with complicated bone metastases. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:240-253. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
13
|
Jaipanya P, Chanplakorn P. Spinal metastasis: narrative reviews of the current evidence and treatment modalities. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221091665. [PMID: 35437050 PMCID: PMC9021485 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221091665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment for spinal metastasis has evolved significantly during the past decade. An advancement in systemic therapy has led to a prolonged overall survival in cancer patients, thus increasing the incidence of spinal metastasis. In addition, with the improved treatment armamentarium, the prediction of patient survival using traditional prognostic models may have limitations and these require the incorporation of some novel parameters to improve their prognostic accuracy. The development of minimally-invasive spinal procedures and minimal access surgical techniques have facilitated a quicker patient recovery and return to systemic treatment. These modern interventions help to alleviate pain and improve quality of life, even in candidates with a relatively short life expectancy. Radiotherapy may be considered in non-surgical candidates or as adjuvant therapy for improving local tumour control. Stereotactic radiosurgery has facilitated this even in radioresistant tumours and may even replace surgery in radiosensitive malignancies. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence leading to the paradigm shifts in the modern treatment of spinal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pilan Jaipanya
- Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Samut Prakan, Thailand.,Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Pongsthorn Chanplakorn
- Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Thureau S, Supiot S, Jouglar E, Rogé M, Lebret L, Hadj Henni A, Beldjoudi G, Lagrange JL, Faivre JC. Radiotherapy of bone metastases. Cancer Radiother 2021; 26:368-376. [PMID: 34955420 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy on bone metastases. This is a common treatment in the management of patients with cancer. It is a relatively simple treatment with proven efficacy in reducing pain or managing spinal cord compression. More complex treatments by stereotaxis can be proposed for oligometastatic patients or in case of reirradiation. In this context, increased vigilance should be given to the risks to the spinal cord.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Thureau
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, Quantif-Litis EA 4108, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France.
| | - S Supiot
- Service de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René- Gauducheau, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - E Jouglar
- Service de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest centre René- Gauducheau, 44800 Saint-Herblain, France
| | - M Rogé
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, Quantif-Litis EA 4108, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - L Lebret
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, Quantif-Litis EA 4108, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - A Hadj Henni
- Département de radiothérapie et de physique médicale, Quantif-Litis EA 4108, centre Henri-Becquerel, 76038 Rouen, France
| | - G Beldjoudi
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Léon-Bérard, 69000 Lyon, France
| | | | - J-C Faivre
- Département de radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine centre Alexis-Vautrin, 54519 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tibdewal A, Sharma A, Gurram L, Mummudi N, Agarwal J. Outcomes of Palliative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression in Lung Cancer-A Prospective Observational Study from Tata Memorial Hospital. South Asian J Cancer 2021; 10:120-126. [PMID: 34568226 PMCID: PMC8460344 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) secondary to lung cancer (LC) is a debilitating complication associated with poor prognosis and is commonly treated with radiotherapy (RT). There is no consensus for RT dose fractionation in spinal cord compression.
Methods
Forty consecutive patients of LC with radiological evidence of MESCC treated with palliative RT were evaluated for functional outcomes (pain, ambulation, and sphincter function) at 2-, 4-, and 24-week post RT completion. Pain assessment was done using visual analogue scale (VAS) and response was categorized according to international consensus criteria, ambulation status (AS) using Tomita’s scale, and sphincter function by the presence or absence of a catheter. Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Impact of potential prognostic factors on survival was also analyzed and
p
-value ≤0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Sixteen, 22, and two patients received 8 Gy single fraction (SF), 20 Gy in five fractions (20/5), and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (30/10), respectively. At 2 weeks, overall response (OR) rates of pain, ambulation, and sphincter control were 73, 81, and 81%, respectively. At 4 and 24 weeks, 93.7, 84.3, 87.5% and 88, 94, 76.5% had OR, respectively. Median OS was 4 months. Six- and 12-months OS was 50 and 37.5%. Nonsignificant difference in OS was seen between SF and 20/5 fractions (median 2.2 vs. 7.1 months,
p
= 0.39). Age ≤50 years was the only significant factor (
p
<0.05) in univariate analysis for OS.
Conclusion
Radiotherapy provided equivalent pain control, ambulation, and sphincter function compared with reported literature in MESCC. Nonsignificant difference in OS exists between SF and multifraction RT regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Tibdewal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Alisha Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Naveen Mummudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jaiprakash Agarwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Palliative radiotherapy indications during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future complex logistic settings: the NORMALITY model. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1619-1656. [PMID: 34570309 PMCID: PMC8475365 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01414-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy.
This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named “La Rete del Sollievo” (“The Net of Relief”)]. The proposed model, denoted “No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy” (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19).
Material and Methods First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed.
Results After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., “Normality model of PRT indications”) for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits. Conclusion We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sun S, Xu B, Zhang Q, Zhao CS, Ma R, He J, Zhang Y. The Early Results of Vertebral Pathological Compression Fracture of Extra- nodal Lymphoma with HIV-positive Patients Treated by Percutaneous Kyphoplasty. Curr HIV Res 2021; 18:248-257. [PMID: 32386494 DOI: 10.2174/1570162x18666200510010207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vertebral pathological compression fracture involving extra-nodal lymphoma impacts negatively on the quality of life of HIV-positive patients. The choice of a safe and effective approach to palliative care in this condition remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of vertebral pathological compression fracture of extra-nodal lymphoma in HIV-positive patients. METHODS A retrospective analysis, from January 2016 to August 2019, was performed on 7 HIVpositive patients, 3 males and 4 females, with extra-nodal lymphoma with a vertebral pathological compression fracture. The patients were treated using percutaneous kyphoplasty in our hospital. Preoperative assessment of the patients was conducted regarding their hematological profile, biochemical indicators, liver and kidney function, blood coagulation function, CD4+T lymphocyte count and viral load. Subsequently, the patients were placed on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (RCHOP) regimen. Besides, antibiotics, nutritional support and immune-modulating drugs were also administered, rationally. Postoperatively, the height of the anterior edge of the injured vertebrae, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) values were evaluated. Patients were also monitored for any complications related to the operation. RESULTS The average CD4+T cell count for the patients was 164 (range 114 ~247 / ul), while the viral load was 26,269 (range 5,765 ~82,321 copies/ul). All patients received nutritional and immune support and registered significant improvements in the levels of ALB and Hb (P<0.05). In all cases, the operation was uneventful with neither cement leakage nor toxic reactions observed. Similarly, no opportunistic infections, other complications or deaths were reported. The height of the anterior vertebral body and the ODI score of the injured vertebrae were significantly improved immediately after surgery (P<0.05). Compared to the preoperative VAS (7.71±1.11), postoperative values were significantly reduced immediately after surgery (3.85±0.90) and at 2 weeks, 1 month and 6 months post-surgery: 2.71±0.76, 3.29±1.11, and 4.00±0.82, respectively (P<0.01). CONCLUSION Supported with appropriate perioperative treatment measures, PKP is safe and effective in the treatment of pathological vertebral compression fracture due to extra-nodal lymphoma in HIV-positive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Sun
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Biao Xu
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Qiang Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Chang-Song Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Rui Ma
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| | - Yao Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, No.8, Jingshun East Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100015, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tsang DS, Vargo JA, Goddard K, Breneman JC, Kalapurakal JA, Marcus KJ. Palliative radiation therapy for children with cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68 Suppl 2:e28292. [PMID: 33818881 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is often used as a palliative treatment for children with recurrent malignant disease to ameliorate or prevent symptoms. However, no guidelines exist regarding the clinical indications or dose fractionation for palliative RT. The goal of this report is to provide guidelines for the use of palliative RT in children with cancer. In this guideline, appropriate indications for palliative RT, recommended dose-fractionation schedules, relevant toxicities, and avenues for future research are explored. RT is an effective palliative treatment for bone, brain, liver, lung, abdominopelvic and head-and-neck metastases, spinal cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome, and bleeding. Single-fraction regimens (8 Gy in one fraction) for children with short life expectancy are recommended for simple, uncomplicated bone metastases and can be considered for some patients with lung or liver metastases. A short, hypofractionated regimen (20 Gy in five fractions) may be used for other indications to minimize overall burden of therapy. There are little data supporting use of more prolonged fractionation regimens, though they may be considered for patients with very good performance status. Future research should focus on response and outcomes data collection, and to rigorously evaluate the role of stereotactic body RT in well-designed, prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek S Tsang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - John Austin Vargo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen Goddard
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - John C Breneman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - John A Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karen J Marcus
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wu SY, Yee E, Chan JW, Chapman CH, Boreta L, Braunstein SE. Timing of Urgent Inpatient Palliative Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100670. [PMID: 33817413 PMCID: PMC8005735 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Urgent indications for palliative radiation therapy (RT) include malignant spinal cord compression, symptomatic brain metastases, pain, airway obstruction, and bleeding. Data on the timing of palliative RT in the inpatient setting are limited. We report our experience with inpatient palliative RT at a tertiary academic center and evaluate the effect of a dedicated inpatient palliative RT nurse practitioner (NP) on treatment timelines. Methods and Materials We performed a retrospective, single-institution review of 219 inpatients consulted for RT to sites of metastatic disease between May 2012 and May 2018. We compared time-to-treatment intervals before and after integrating an NP for palliative RT in August 2017. Results The median age of the 219 patients receiving RT was 61 years (interquartile range [IQR], 51-69 years). The most frequent indications were symptomatic brain metastases (73 patients [33%]), pain (61 patients [28%]), and cord/cauda compression (48 patients [22%]). The median time from consultation request to consult was 1 day (IQR, 0-2 days), and the median time from consultation request to first RT fraction was 3 days (IQR, 2-6 days). The median time from consultation request to RT was shorter for cord compression (2 [IQR, 1-4] days) than for pain (5 [IQR, 2-7] days) (P = .001) or symptomatic brain metastases (3 [IQR, 1-6] days; P = .037). With an NP, patients were more likely to undergo same-day consultation and simulation (75% vs 60%; P = .045), which was associated with shorter median duration from consultation to initiation of RT (1 [IQR, 0-3] days vs 4 [IQR, 2-7] days; P <.001). After the integration of an NP for palliative RT, patients had a higher median Karnofsky Performance Score (70 [IQR, 60-80] vs 50 [IQR, 40-60]; P < .001) and were more likely to complete their prescribed RT course (93% vs 82%; P = .05) Conclusions Time from consultation request to RT is necessarily short for urgent inpatient palliative RT. Advanced practice providers may facilitate and potentially expedite treatment, with significantly shorter times to treatment among patients who undergo same-day consultation and simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Y Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emily Yee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Jason W Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Christopher H Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Lauren Boreta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Steve E Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
An Overview of Decision Making in the Management of Metastatic Spinal Tumors. Indian J Orthop 2021; 55:799-814. [PMID: 34194637 PMCID: PMC8192670 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00368-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Spinal metastases are the most commonly encountered spinal tumors. With increasing life expectancy and better systemic treatment options, the incidence of patients seeking treatment for spinal metastasis is rising. Radical resections and conventional low-dose radiotherapy have given way to modern 'separation' surgeries and stereotactic body radiotherapy which entails lesser morbidity and improved local control. This article provides an overview of the decision making and currently available treatment options for metastatic spinal tumors. METHODS A MEDLINE literature search was made for studies in English language reporting on human subjects, describing results of various treatment options that are a part of multidisciplinary management of metastatic spinal tumors. The highest-quality evidence available in the literature was reviewed. DISCUSSION Treatment of patients with metastatic spinal tumors is largely palliative, with radiotherapy and selective surgery being the mainstays of management. Multidisciplinary management that incorporates factors like patient performance status, expected survival and systemic burden of disease and employs well-validated decision-making frameworks for guiding treatment holds the key to an effective palliative treatment strategy. Effective pain management, achieving local control, adequate neurological decompression in the setting of epidural cord compression and surgical stabilization for mechanical stabilization are the main goals of treatment. CONCLUSION The management of metastatic spinal tumors has been rapidly evolving; currently, limited decompression and stabilization followed by postoperative SBRT for local tumor control are associated with less morbidity and may be referred to as the current standard of care in these patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Pontoriero A, Lillo S, Caravatta L, Bellafiore F, Longo S, Lattanzi E, Parisi S, Fiorica F, Massaccesi M. Cumulative dose, toxicity, and outcomes of spinal metastases re-irradiation : Systematic review on behalf of the Re-Irradiation Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO). Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:369-384. [PMID: 33635395 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01748-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify patient-, tumor-, or treatment-related factors which may affect disease-related outcomes of re-irradiation (reRT) in patients with previously irradiated vertebral metastases. METHODS A computerized search of the literature was performed by searching for terms related to reRT and spinal metastases in MEDLINE, EMBASE, OVID, and the Cochrane database from 1995 to 2019. Studies including at least 10 patients who had received reRT at the same site of initial radiotherapy for vertebral metastases with localized external beam radiotherapy were included. To determine the pooled ≥G3 acute and late toxicity rate, pain relief, local control, and overall survival, a meta-analysis technique of single-arm studies was performed. RESULTS Nineteen studies including 1373 patients met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The pooled pain relief, neurological improvement, 1‑year local control, and 1‑year overall survival rates were 74.3%, 73.8%, 78.8%, and 54.6%, respectively, with moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. No difference in heterogeneity was evidenced for pain relief or local control after omitting studies not using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or studies delivering biologically effective dose (BED) < 45 Gy10, whereas heterogeneity for 1‑year OS was lower after omitting studies not using SBRT and delivering BED < 45 Gy10. The pooled results of grade ≥ 3 acute and late toxicity were 0.4% (95% confidence interval: 0.1-1.2%) and 2.2% (95% confidence interval: 1.2-37%), respectively, with low heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSION While this systematic review confirmed that reRT is both safe and effective for treating patients with recurrent spinal metastases, it could not identify factors which may affect outcomes of reRT in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Luciana Caravatta
- Radiation Oncology Unit, "SS Annunziata" Hospital, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Silvia Longo
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Fiorica
- Radiotherapy and Nuclear Medicine Department, AULSS 9 Scaligera, Verona, Italy
| | - Mariangela Massaccesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chen B, Cai L, Zhou F. Management of acute spinal cord compression in multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 160:103205. [PMID: 33387626 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord compression (SCC) is a devastating complication of multiple myeloma and has the potential to cause loss of neurological function. The common symptoms of SCC are back pain, motor weakness, and sensory change. Once diagnosed, the patient should be managed as soon as possible to prevent permanent loss of neurological function. Currently, there have been a number of studies describing the mechanism and management experience of SCC in patients with myeloma. The clinical features, diagnostic strategies, and the roles of different therapeutic options are herein reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Chen
- Department of Hematology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
| | - Lin Cai
- Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
| | - Fuling Zhou
- Department of Hematology, Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Management of metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS) has evolved, and molecular characterization of metastatic disease is now routinely done. Targeted therapies, once few in number with limited penetration into the CNS, have multiplied in number and increased in CNS coverage. This article addresses recent advances in the evaluation and clinical management of patients with CNS metastasis. RECENT FINDINGS Metastasis of cancer to the CNS can be diagnosed and characterized with novel techniques, including molecular analyses of the spinal fluid, so-called liquid biopsies. Resected parenchymal CNS metastases are now routinely subjected to genomic sequencing. For patients with CNS metastases displaying targetable mutations, a wide variety of treatment options are available, including deferral of radiation therapy in favor of a trial of an orally bioavailable targeted therapy or immunotherapy. For patients without a molecularly targetable lesion, local treatment in the form of radiation therapy, now most often stereotactic radiosurgery, is supplanting untargeted whole-brain radiation therapy. SUMMARY Technologic advances in diagnosis and management have resulted in new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with metastasis to the CNS, with resulting improvements in progression-free and overall survival.
Collapse
|
24
|
Loblaw A, George K, Misra V. Surgical and Radiotherapeutic Management of Malignant Extradural Spinal Cord Compression. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:745-752. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Zhang HR, Li JK, Yang XG, Qiao RQ, Hu YC. Conventional Radiotherapy and Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Metastatic Spine Disease. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820945798. [PMID: 32757820 PMCID: PMC7432975 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820945798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal metastases are a common manifestation of malignant tumors that can cause
severe pain, spinal cord compression, pathological fractures, and hypercalcemia,
and these clinical manifestations will ultimately reduce the health-related
quality of life and even shorten life expectancy in patient with cancer.
Effective management of spinal bone metastases requires multidisciplinary
collaboration, including radiologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical
oncologists, and pain specialists. In the past few decades, conventional
radiotherapy has been the most common form of radiotherapy, which can achieve
favorable local control and pain relief; however, it lacks precise methods of
delivering radiation and thus cannot provide sufficient tumoricidal dose. The
advent of stereotactic radiosurgery has changed this situation by using highly
focused radiation beams guided by 3-dimensional imaging to deliver a high
biologic equivalent dose to the target region, and the spinal cord can be
identified and excluded from the target volume to reduce the risk of
radiation-induced myelopathy. Separation surgery can provide a 2- to 3-mm safe
separation of tumor and spinal cord to avoid radiation-induced damage to the
spinal cord. Targets for separation surgery include decompression of metastatic
epidural spinal cord compression and spinal stabilization without partial or en
bloc tumor resection. Combined with conventional radiotherapy, stereotactic
radiosurgery can provide better local tumor control and pain relief. Several
scoring systems have been developed to estimate the life expectancy of patients
with spinal metastases treated with radiotherapy. Thorough understanding of
radiotherapy-related knowledge including the dose-fractionation schedule,
separation surgery, efficacy and safety, scoring systems, and feasibility of
combination with other treatment methods is critical to providing optimal
patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Ran Zhang
- Department of Bone Tumor, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Ji-Kai Li
- Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | | | - Rui-Qi Qiao
- Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yong-Cheng Hu
- Department of Bone Tumor, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yerramilli D, Xu AJ, Gillespie EF, Shepherd AF, Beal K, Gomez D, Yamada J, Tsai CJ, Yang TJ. Palliative Radiation Therapy for Oncologic Emergencies in the Setting of COVID-19: Approaches to Balancing Risks and Benefits. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:589-594. [PMID: 32363243 PMCID: PMC7194647 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Palliation of metastatic disease compromises a significant portion of radiation treatments in the United States. These patients present a unique challenge in resource-limited settings, as expeditious treatment is often required to prevent serious morbidity. In order to reduce the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 and maximize the benefit to patients, we present evidence-based recommendations for radiation in patients with oncologic emergencies. Radiation oncologists with expertise in the treatment of metastatic disease at a high-volume comprehensive cancer center reviewed the available evidence and recommended best practices for the treatment of common oncologic emergencies, with attention to balancing the risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 and the potential morbidity of delaying treatment. Many prospective trials and national guidelines support the use of abbreviated courses of radiotherapy for patients with oncologic emergencies. As such, in the setting of the current coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the use of hypofractionated radiation therapy for patients requiring palliation for oncologic emergencies achieves desirable functional outcomes without compromising care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erin F. Gillespie
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for Oligometastatic and Metastatic Disease) Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Annemarie F. Shepherd
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for Oligometastatic and Metastatic Disease) Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kathryn Beal
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for Oligometastatic and Metastatic Disease) Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel Gomez
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for Oligometastatic and Metastatic Disease) Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Josh Yamada
- PROMISE (Precision Radiation for Oligometastatic and Metastatic Disease) Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of bulky spine metastases. J Neurooncol 2020; 148:381-388. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
28
|
Kurisunkal V, Gulia A, Gupta S. Principles of Management of Spine Metastasis. Indian J Orthop 2020; 54:181-193. [PMID: 32257036 PMCID: PMC7096601 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-019-00008-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With evolution of medicine, radiation therapy and surgical methods, cancer care has improved the quality of life for patients with improved survival and functional status in patients with skeletal metastasis. The most common site of skeletal metastases from other primary malignant neoplasms is the spine, hence, understanding the epidemiology of metastatic spine disease and its presentation is essential for developing a diagnostic and treatment strategy which eventually results in optimum care to reduce disease-related morbidity. PURPOSE With this review article we intend to describe an evidence-based review on the presentation, diagnosis and treatment of metastatic spinal disease. METHODS We reviewed the current available literature on management of spinal metastasis and have described a step wise evaluation and management strategy of metastatic spine disease. CONCLUSION The present review article addresses various aspects and related controversies related to evaluation, staging and treatment options in the management of spinal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineet Kurisunkal
- Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Ashish Gulia
- Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| | - Srinath Gupta
- Orthopaedic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai, India
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Non-inferiority randomised phase 3 trial comparing two radiation schedules (single vs. five fractions) in malignant spinal cord compression. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:1315-1323. [PMID: 32157242 PMCID: PMC7188681 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0768-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The optimal EBRT schedule for MSCC is undetermined. Our aim was to determine whether a single fraction (SF) was non-inferior to five daily fractions (5Fx), for functional motor outcome. Methods Patients not proceeding with surgical decompression in this multicentre non-inferiority, Phase 3 trial were randomised to 10 Gy/SF or 20 Gy/5Fx. A change in mobility from baseline to 5 weeks for each patient, was evaluated by a Modified Tomita score: 1 = ‘Walk unaided’, 2 = ‘With walking aid’ and 3 = ‘Bed-bound’. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was a detrimental change of −0.4 in the mean difference between arms. Results One-hundred and twelve eligible patients were enrolled. Seventy-three patients aged 30–87 were evaluated for the primary analysis. The 95% CI for the difference in the mean change in mobility scores between arms was −0.12 to 0.6. Since −0.4 is not included in the interval, there is evidence that 10 Gy/SF is non-inferior to 20 Gy/5Fx. One grade 3 AE was reported in the 5Fx arm. Twelve (26%) patients in the 5Fx arm had a Grade 2–3 AE compared with six (11%) patients in the SF arm (p = 0.093). Conclusion For mobility preservation, one 10-Gy fraction is non-inferior to 20 Gy in five fractions, in patients with MSCC not proceeding with surgical decompression. Clinical Trial Registration Cancer Trials Ireland ICORG 05-03; NCT00968643; EU-20952.
Collapse
|
30
|
Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, Holt T, McMenemin R, Dubois D, McKinna F, Foran B, Madhavan K, MacGregor C, Bates A, O’Rourke N, Lester JF, Sevitt T, Roos D, Dixit S, Brown G, Arnott S, Thomas SS, Forsyth S, Beare S, Reczko K, Hackshaw A, Lopes A. Effect of Single-Fraction vs Multifraction Radiotherapy on Ambulatory Status Among Patients With Spinal Canal Compression From Metastatic Cancer: The SCORAD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2019; 322:2084-2094. [PMID: 31794625 PMCID: PMC6902166 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.17913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Malignant spinal canal compression, a major complication of metastatic cancer, is managed with radiotherapy to maintain mobility and relieve pain, although there is no standard radiotherapy regimen. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether single-fraction radiotherapy is noninferior to 5 fractions of radiotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted in 42 UK and 5 Australian radiotherapy centers. Eligible patients (n = 686) had metastatic cancer with spinal cord or cauda equina compression, life expectancy greater than 8 weeks, and no previous radiotherapy to the same area. Patients were recruited between February 2008 and April 2016, with final follow-up in September 2017. INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive external beam single-fraction 8-Gy radiotherapy (n = 345) or 20 Gy of radiotherapy in 5 fractions over 5 consecutive days (n = 341). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was ambulatory status at week 8, based on a 4-point scale and classified as grade 1 (ambulatory without the use of aids and grade 5 of 5 muscle power) or grade 2 (ambulatory using aids or grade 4 of 5 muscle power). The noninferiority margin for the difference in ambulatory status was -11%. Secondary end points included ambulatory status at weeks 1, 4, and 12 and overall survival. RESULTS Among 686 randomized patients (median [interquartile range] age, 70 [64-77] years; 503 (73%) men; 44% had prostate cancer, 19% had lung cancer, and 12% had breast cancer), 342 (49.8%) were analyzed for the primary end point (255 patients died before the 8-week assessment). Ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 at week 8 was achieved by 115 of 166 (69.3%) patients in the single-fraction group vs 128 of 176 (72.7%) in the multifraction group (difference, -3.5% [1-sided 95% CI, -11.5% to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .06). The difference in ambulatory status grade 1 or 2 in the single-fraction vs multifraction group was -0.4% (63.9% vs 64.3%; [1-sided 95% CI, -6.9 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .004) at week 1, -0.7% (66.8% vs 67.6%; [1-sided 95% CI, -8.1 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .01) at week 4, and 4.1% (71.8% vs 67.7%; [1-sided 95% CI, -4.6 to ∞]; P value for noninferiority = .002) at week 12. Overall survival rates at 12 weeks were 50% in the single-fraction group vs 55% in the multifraction group (stratified hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.74-1.41]). Of the 11 other secondary end points that were analyzed, the between-group differences were not statistically significant or did not meet noninferiority criterion. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients with malignant metastatic solid tumors and spinal canal compression, a single radiotherapy dose, compared with a multifraction dose delivered over 5 days, did not meet the criterion for noninferiority for the primary outcome (ambulatory at 8 weeks). However, the extent to which the lower bound of the CI overlapped with the noninferiority margin should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of this finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Identifiers: ISRCTN97555949 and ISRCTN97108008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J. Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kirsten Hopkins
- Bristol Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Vivek Misra
- The Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Tanya Holt
- Princess Alexandra Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | - Danny Dubois
- Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Fiona McKinna
- Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Andrew Bates
- Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Noelle O’Rourke
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tim Sevitt
- Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel Roos
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sandy Beare
- CRUK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Andre Lopes
- CRUK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Rades D, Hansen O, Jensen LH, Dziggel L, Staackmann C, Doemer C, Cacicedo J, Conde-Moreno AJ, Segedin B, Ciervide-Jurio R, Rubio-Rodriguez C, Perez-Romasanta LA, Alvarez-Gracia A, Dennis K, Ferrer-Albiach C, Navarro-Martin A, Lopez-Campos F, Jankarashvili N, Janssen S, Olbrich D, Holländer NH. Radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression with increased radiation doses (RAMSES-01): a prospective multicenter study. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1163. [PMID: 31783816 PMCID: PMC6884857 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6390-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and favorable survival prognoses can benefit from radiation doses greater than 30Gy in 10 fractions in terms of improved local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS/DESIGN This prospective study mainly investigates LPFS after precision radiotherapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy) with 18 × 2.33Gy in 3.5 weeks. LPFS is defined as freedom from progression of motor deficits during radiotherapy and an in-field recurrence of MSCC following radiotherapy. The maximum relative dose allowed to the spinal cord is 101.5% of the prescribed dose, resulting in an equivalent dose in 2Gy-fractions (EQD2) for radiation myelopathy is 45.5Gy, which is below the tolerance dose of 50Gy according to the Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). The EQD2 of this regimen for tumor cell kill is 43.1Gy, which is 33% higher than for 30Gy in 10 fractions (EQD2 = 32.5Gy). Primary endpoint is LPFS at 12 months after radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include the effect of 18 × 2.33Gy on motor function, ambulatory status, sensory function, sphincter dysfunction, LPFS at other follow-up times, overall survival, pain relief, relief of distress and toxicity. Follow-up visits for all endpoints will be performed directly and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after radiotherapy. A total of 65 patients are required for the prospective part of the study. These patients will be compared to a historical control group of at least 235 patients receiving conventional radiotherapy with 10x3Gy in 2 weeks. DISCUSSION If precision radiotherapy with 18 × 2.33Gy results in significantly better LPFS than 10x3Gy of conventional radiotherapy, this regimen should be strongly considered for patients with MSCC and favorable survival prognoses. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04043156. Registered 30-07-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Olfred Hansen
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Liesa Dziggel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Christian Staackmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Claudia Doemer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562 Lübeck, Germany
| | - Jon Cacicedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cruces University Hospital, Barakaldo, Vizcaya Spain
| | - Antonio J. Conde-Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University and Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Barbara Segedin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | | | - Ana Alvarez-Gracia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ICO - University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
| | - Kristopher Dennis
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital & University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Carlos Ferrer-Albiach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Consorcio Hospital Provincial de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Stefan Janssen
- Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Niels Henrik Holländer
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Units, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rades D, Šegedin B, Conde-Moreno AJ, Ferrer-Albiach C, Metz M, Polat B, Badakhshi H, Schreiber A, Nitsche M, Cacicedo J, Schild SE. Patient-Reported Outcomes–Secondary Analysis of the SCORE-2 Trial Comparing 4 Gy × 5 to 3 Gy × 10 for Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:760-764. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
33
|
Abstract
This article reviews the most common oncologic emergencies encountered by the radiation oncologist, including malignant spinal cord compression, intramedullary spinal cord metastasis, superior vena cava syndrome, hemoptysis, and airway compromise caused by tumor. Important trials evaluating different treatments for these emergencies are reviewed. The role of corticosteroids, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy in these patients is discussed and patient-specific treatment guidelines are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mannat Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Pranshu Mohindra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Mark Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - William Regine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA
| | - Young Kwok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Parker SM, Wei RL, Jones JA, Mattes MD. A targeted needs assessment to improve referral patterns for palliative radiation therapy. ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE 2019; 8:516-522. [PMID: 31594377 PMCID: PMC7444431 DOI: 10.21037/apm.2019.08.02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) can effectively palliate a variety of symptoms in patients with metastatic cancer, using relatively low doses that infrequently cause major side effects. However, palliative radiation is often underutilized and sub-optimally implemented. In this study, we surveyed the Society of Palliative Radiation Oncology (SPRO) membership to identify barriers to appropriate referral for palliative RT that they encounter in their practice, and identify specific groups of physicians who radiation oncologists believed would benefit most from further education on when to refer patients. A total of 28 radiation oncologists responded to the survey with a response rate of 20.5%. On average, participants felt that referrals for palliative RT were inappropriately delayed 46.5% [standard deviation (STD) 20.2%] of the time. The most common barrier to referral for medical oncologists was thought to be potential interference with systemic therapy (33%); for primary care physicians and surgeons it was a lack of knowledge about the benefit (42%), and for palliative care physicians it was concern for patient convenience (25%). For brain metastases and spinal cord compression radiation oncology was felt to be part of the initial referral sequence more than 50% of the time, but less so for thoracic airway obstruction/bleeding (38%), esophageal obstruction (16%), or urinary obstruction/bleeding (8%), where another subspecialist was more often consulted first. Primary care, geriatric medicine, and emergency medicine were considered among the least knowledgeable specialties about palliative radiation. These hypothesis-generating findings can guide approaches to improve referral patterns for this important aspect of supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Parker
- School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Randy L Wei
- Memorial Radiation Oncology Medical Group, Fountain Valley, CA, USA
| | - Joshua A Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Malcolm D Mattes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kerstens P, Yi M, James M. Radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression; can the Rades score predict survival? Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 2019; 15:331-336. [PMID: 31436904 DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) can be debilitating and painful and carries a poor prognosis. There is increasing evidence that MSCC can be treated with single-fraction radiotherapy. The Rades score is designed to assist in identifying better prognosis patients who may benefit from longer radiotherapy courses. This study aims to study patterns of care for MSCC at a single center in New Zealand, and assess the Rades score and other variables as predictors of survival. METHODS An audit of patients receiving palliative radiotherapy for MSCC at a single center over a 5- year period (2010-2014) was performed. Independent variables and the Rades score were gathered for each patient for statistical analysis to investigate associations between potential prognostic factors, treatments and survival. RESULTS A total of 83 patients underwent analysis. Median overall survival was 14 weeks. Twenty Gray in five fractions (20 Gy/5) was the most frequently delivered radiotherapy course (89%). The simplified Rades score effectively stratified patients with Group 3 patients having significantly better survival with 40% surviving to 6 months compared to Group 1 and 2. Cancer type, receiving chemotherapy and receiving surgery were also significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION Overall survival at our centre is consistent with other published series. The Rades score is valid for predicting more prolonged survival in our population and could be used in selecting patients for longer radiotherapy courses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kerstens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Ma Yi
- Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Melissa James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Clément-Zhao A, Luu M, Bibault JE, Daveau C, Kreps S, Jaulmes H, Dessard-Diana B, Housset M, Giraud P, Durdux C. Effective delivery of palliative radiotherapy: A prospective study. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:365-369. [PMID: 31300329 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 09/14/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The main goal of palliative radiotherapy is to reduce patient's discomfort. But sometimes patients do not receive any benefits from this treatment because of rapid worsening of their general condition. This prospective monocentric study assessed the effective delivery of palliative radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 1st December 2015 to 29th February 2016, all consecutive patients receiving palliative radiotherapy in our hospital were included. The primary endpoint was the effective delivery of palliative radiotherapy according to the initial prescription (total dose, overall treatment time and fractionation). The secondary endpoints were the number of treatment breaks, the clinical benefit, the number of deaths and the delays for admission in the palliative care unit. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients were included and 64 treatments were analysed. The treatment sites were: bone (70.3%) and brain (21.9%). The treatment goals were: pain control only (43.8%), decompression only (21.9%), pain control and decompression (32.8%), haemostatic aim (1.6%). Palliative treatment was achieved in 57 cases (89%). Temporary interruption of the radiotherapy treatment was necessary in six cases (9.4%; three for medical reason, three for logistic reason). The main reason of permanent interruption was worsening of performance status (seven cases). Palliation of symptoms (complete or partial responses) was obtained in 44 cases (68.8%). Seven patients (11.9%) died during the month after the end of the treatment. No delay or cancellation for admission in the palliative care unit were observed. CONCLUSION Palliative radiotherapy was completed as originally planned in 51 cases (79.9%) with a clinical benefit for 44 cases (68.8%). Radiation therapy must not be neglected as a palliative treatment at the end-of-life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Clément-Zhao
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Department of radiotherapy, institut Curie, 35 rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France.
| | - M Luu
- Mobile palliative care unit, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - J-E Bibault
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - C Daveau
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - S Kreps
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - H Jaulmes
- Mobile palliative care unit, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - B Dessard-Diana
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - M Housset
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - P Giraud
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - C Durdux
- Department of radiotherapy, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Pahuta M, Frombach A, Hashem E, Spence S, Sun C, Wai EK, Werier J, van Walraven C, Coyle D. The Psychometric Properties of a Self-Administered, Open-Source Module for Valuing Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression Utilities. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2019; 3:197-204. [PMID: 30178420 PMCID: PMC6533369 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-018-0092-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Web surveys are often used for utility valuation. Typically, custom utility valuation tools that have not undergone psychometric evaluation are used. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of a metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) module run on a customizable open-source, internet-based, self-directed utility valuation platform (Self-directed Online Assessment of Preferences [SOAP]). METHODS Individuals accompanying patients to the emergency department waiting room in Ottawa, Canada, were recruited. Participants made SOAP MESCC health state valuations in the waiting room and 48 h later at home. Validity, agreement reliability, and responsiveness were measured by logical consistency of responses, smallest detectable change, the interclass correlation coefficient, and Guyatt's responsiveness index, respectively. RESULTS Of 285 participants who completed utility valuations, only 113 (39.6%) completed the re-test. Of these 113 participants, 92 (81.4%) provided valid responses on the first test and 75 (66.4%) provided valid responses on the test and re-test. Agreement for all groups of health states was adequate, since their smallest detectable change was less than the minimal clinically important difference. The mean interclass correlation coefficients for all health states were > 0.8, indicating at least substantial reliability. Guyatt's responsiveness indices all exceeded 0.80, indicating a high level of responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this is the first validated open-source, web-based, self-directed utility valuation module. We have demonstrated the SOAP MESCC module is valid, reproducible, and responsive for obtaining ex ante utilities. Considering the successful psychometric validation of the SOAP MESCC module, other investigators can consider developing modules for other diseases where direct utility valuation is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markian Pahuta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Blvd, CFP-6, Detroit, MI USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Eugene K. Wai
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Joel Werier
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Carl van Walraven
- Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Doug Coyle
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Levin AS, Alcorn SR, Neuman BJ, Meyer CF. Team Approach: Emergencies in Patients with Skeletal Metastases. JBJS Rev 2019; 7:e8. [PMID: 30920480 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.18.00036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S Levin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (A.S.L. and B.J.N.), Department of Radiation and Molecular Radiation Sciences (S.R.A.), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (C.F.M.), The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Donovan EK, Sienna J, Mitera G, Kumar-Tyagi N, Parpia S, Swaminath A. Single versus multifraction radiotherapy for spinal cord compression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2019; 134:55-66. [PMID: 31005225 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2018] [Revised: 01/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While multifraction radiotherapy (RT) regimens (MFRT) have been considered the standard of care in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) with limited prognosis, recent randomized evidence has demonstrated that single fraction RT (SFRT) may be equivalent in terms of functional and overall outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the effects of SFRT compared to short course MFRT in patients with MESCC. METHODS A search of OVID, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 2018 was conducted. Randomized and prospective non-randomized trials comparing SFRT and short course MFRT for MESCC were included. Data were analyzed using a random effects model, and relative risks (RR) or hazard ratios (HR) were reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria. RESULTS Overall 1717 articles were reviewed. Three randomized trials were eligible for inclusion (n = 712 patients). The pooled treatment effect for SFRT versus MFRT with respect to motor response was RR = 0.96 (95% CI = 0.86-1.07, I2 = 19%), HR = 1.00 (95% CI = 0.88-1.13, I2 = 0%) for OS, and RR = 0.97, (95% CI = 0.85-1.11, I2 = 61%) for bladder function. There was insufficient data to perform a meta-analysis on quality of life, toxicity or pain response, however available information suggests pain response appears similar between SFRT and MFRT. Overall quality of evidence was deemed moderate due to risk of bias. There was no evidence of an observed difference with respect to motor response, bladder dysfunction and OS between SFRT and MFRT for MESCC in patients with a limited prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elysia K Donovan
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Julianna Sienna
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gunita Mitera
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nidhi Kumar-Tyagi
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Sameer Parpia
- Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Anand Swaminath
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Bollen L, Dijkstra SPD, Bartels RHMA, de Graeff A, Poelma DLH, Brouwer T, Algra PR, Kuijlen JMA, Minnema MC, Nijboer C, Rolf C, Sluis T, Terheggen MAMB, van der Togt-van Leeuwen ACM, van der Linden YM, Taal W. Clinical management of spinal metastases-The Dutch national guideline. Eur J Cancer 2018; 104:81-90. [PMID: 30336360 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2018] [Revised: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 08/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This article is a summary of the revised Dutch multidisciplinary evidence-based guideline 'Spinal metastases' (English translation available at: https://www.oncoline.nl/spinal-metastases) that was published at the end of 2015. This summary provides an easy-to-use overview for physicians to use in their daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurens Bollen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sander P D Dijkstra
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Orthopedics, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald H M A Bartels
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Neurosurgery, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander de Graeff
- University Medical Centre Utrecht, Department of Medical Oncology, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Davey L H Poelma
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Borniastraat 36, 8934 AD Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Thea Brouwer
- National Federation of Cancer Patient Organizations, P.O. Box 8152, 3503 RD Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul R Algra
- Alkmaar Medical Centre, Department of Radiology, P.O. Box 501, 1800 AM Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - Jos M A Kuijlen
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Neurosurgery, P.O. Box 30001, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique C Minnema
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, Department of Hematology, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Claudia Nijboer
- VU University Medical Center, Department of Neurology, P.O. Box 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christa Rolf
- Community Health Center Hardijzer en Rolf, Jel Rinckesstrjitte 2, 8851 ED Tzummarum, the Netherlands
| | - Tebbe Sluis
- Rijndam Rehabilitation Centre, SCI Unit, Westersingel 300, 3015 LJ Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel A M B Terheggen
- Rijnstate, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Palliatieve Care, P.O. Box 9555, 6800 TA Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | - Yvette M van der Linden
- Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Radiotherapy, Centre of Expertise Palliative Care, P.O. Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Walter Taal
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Neuro-Oncology/Neurology, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Fischer-Valuck BW, Baumann BC, Apicelli A, Rao YJ, Roach M, Daly M, Dans MC, White P, Contreras J, Henke L, Gay H, Michalski JM, Abraham C. Palliative radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases at diagnosis: A hospital-based analysis of patterns of care, RT fractionation scheme, and overall survival. Cancer Med 2018; 7:4240-4250. [PMID: 30120817 PMCID: PMC6144149 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 06/10/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies associated with bone metastases, and palliative radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment option. A total of 2641 patients were identified with PCa and bone metastases at diagnosis from 2010 to 2014 in the NCDB. Fractionation scheme was designated as short course ([SC‐RT]: 8 Gy in 1 fraction and 20 Gy in 5 fractions) vs long course ([LC‐RT]: 30 Gy in 10 fractions and 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions). Patient characteristics were correlated with fractionation scheme using logistic regression. Overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method, log‐rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score‐matched analyses. A total of 2255 (85.4%) patients were included in the LC‐RT group and 386 (14.6%) patients in the SC‐RT group. SC‐RT was more common in patients over 75 years age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32‐2.20), treatment at an academic center (OR: 1.76, 1.20‐2.57), living greater than 15 miles distance to treatment facility (OR: 1.38, 1.05‐1.83), treatment to the rib (OR: 2.99, 1.36‐6.60), and in 2014 (OR: 1.73, 1.19‐2.51). RT to the spine was more commonly long course (P < .0001). In the propensity‐matched cohort, LC‐RT was associated with improved OS (P < .0001), but no OS difference was observed between 37.5 Gy and either 8 Gy in one fraction or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (P > .5). LC‐RT remains the most common treatment fractionation scheme for palliative bone metastases in PCa patients. Use of palliative SC‐RT is increasing, particularly in more recent years, for older patients, treatment at academic centers, and with increasing distance from a treatment center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian C Baumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Anthony Apicelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Yuan James Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Michael Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mackenzie Daly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Maria C Dans
- Division of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, Department of Hospital Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Patrick White
- Division of Hospice & Palliative Medicine, Department of Hospital Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jessika Contreras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Hiram Gay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jeff M Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Christopher Abraham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lee KA, Dunne M, Small C, Kelly PJ, McArdle O, O’Sullivan J, Hacking D, Pomeroy M, Armstrong J, Moriarty M, Clayton-Lea A, Parker I, Collins CD, Thirion P. (ICORG 05-03): prospective randomized non-inferiority phase III trial comparing two radiation schedules in malignant spinal cord compression (not proceeding with surgical decompression); the quality of life analysis. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:965-972. [PMID: 29419331 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1433320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal primary external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) radiation schedule for malignant epidural spinal cord compression (MSCC) remains to be determined. The ICORG 05-03 trial assessed if a 10 Gy single fraction radiation schedule was not inferior to one with 20 Gray (Gy) in five daily fractions, in terms of functional motor outcome, for the treatment of MSCC in patients not proceeding with surgical decompression. This article reports on two of the secondary endpoints, Quality of life (QoL), assessed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) version 3.0 (EORTC Data Center, Brussels, Belgium) and pain control assessed using a visual analog scale. METHODS A randomized, parallel group, multicenter phase III trial was conducted by Cancer Trials Ireland (formerly All-Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, ICORG), across five hospital sites in Ireland and Northern Ireland. Patients were randomized to 10 Gy single fraction of EBRT or 20 Gy in five fractions in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with baseline and 5-week follow up QoL data are included in this analysis. FINDINGS From 2006 to 2014, 112 eligible patients were enrolled for whom 57 were evaluated for this secondary analysis. After adjusting for pre-intervention scores, there was no statistically significant difference in post-treatment Summary scores (excl. FI and QL), or pain scores between the two RT schedules at 5 weeks and 3 months following EBRT. There was a statistically significant relationship between the pretreatment and post-treatment Summary scores (p = .002) but not between the pre-treatment and post-treatment pain scores. INTERPRETATION Primary radiotherapy for the treatment of MSCC significantly improves QoL in patients not proceeding with surgical decompression. After adjusting for pre-intervention scores, there was no statistically significant difference between a 10 Gy single fraction radiation schedule and one with 20 Gy in five daily fractions on post-treatment QoL Summary scores. For most patients, an effective treatment with low burden would be desirable. A single fraction schedule should be considered for this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K. A. Lee
- Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M. Dunne
- Clinical Trials Unit, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C. Small
- Radiation Oncology Department, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - P. J. Kelly
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - O. McArdle
- Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - J. O’Sullivan
- Radiation Oncology Department, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - D. Hacking
- Radiation Oncology Department, Whitfield Clinic, Waterford, Ireland
| | - M. Pomeroy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - J. Armstrong
- Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - M. Moriarty
- Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - A. Clayton-Lea
- Operational Services, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - I. Parker
- Radiation Oncology Department, All Ireland Cooperative Oncology Research Group, Dublin, Ireland
| | - C. D. Collins
- Radiology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | - P. Thirion
- Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke’s Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hypofractionated radiotherapy for complicated bone metastases in patients with poor performance status: a phase II international trial. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 105:181-187. [DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions, 1 week apart) in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status. Methods: A prospective single-arm phase II clinical trial was conducted from July 2014 to May 2016. The primary endpoint was pain response as defined in the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints. Secondary endpoints included quality of life as measured by quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) PAL-15 and QLQ-BM22 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer guidelines, pain flare, adverse events, re-irradiation, and skeletal complications. Results: Fifty patients were enrolled. There were 23 men with a median age of 58 years (range 26-86). Of the 50 patients, 38 had an extraosseous soft tissue component, 18 needed postsurgical radiation, 3 had neuropathic pain, and 3 had an impending fracture in a weight-bearing bone. At 2 months, 33 patients were alive (66%). Four (12.5%) had a complete response and 12 (37.5%) had a partial response. A statistically significant improvement was seen in the functional interference (p = 0.01) and psychosocial aspects (p = 0.03) of the BM22. No patient had spinal cord compression. One patient required surgery for pathologic fracture, and another re-irradiation. Conclusions: Hypofractionated radiotherapy (16 Gy in 2 fractions of 8 Gy 1 week apart) achieved satisfactory pain relief and safety results in patients with complicated bone metastases and poor performance status.
Collapse
|
44
|
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Spencer
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK
| | - Rhona Parrish
- Garforth Medical Centre, Garforth, Leeds LS25 1HB, UK
| | - Rachael Barton
- Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Castle Hill Hospital, Cottingham HU16 5JQ, UK
| | - Ann Henry
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9NL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
De Felice F, Piccioli A, Musio D, Tombolini V. The role of radiation therapy in bone metastases management. Oncotarget 2018; 8:25691-25699. [PMID: 28148890 PMCID: PMC5421962 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Bone metastases represent an important complication of malignant tumours. Despite improvement in surgical techniques and advances in systemic therapies, management of patients with bone metastatic disease remains a powerful cornerstone for the radiation oncologist. The primary goal of radiation therapy is to provide pain relief, preserving patients quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Piccioli
- Oncology Center, Palazzo Baleani, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Musio
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rades D, Schiff D. Epidural and intramedullary spinal metastasis: clinical features and role of fractionated radiotherapy. HANDBOOK OF CLINICAL NEUROLOGY 2018; 149:227-238. [PMID: 29307355 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811161-1.00015-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Metastases involving the spinal epidural space and cord parenchyma are major sources of neurological impairment and decreased quality of life in cancer patients. Herein we review the clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, importance of early diagnosis and initiation of treatment, and role of fractionated radiotherapy of these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
| | - David Schiff
- Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
He J, Xiao J, Peng X, Duan B, Li Y, Ai P, Yao M, Chen N. Dose escalation by image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy leads to an increase in pain relief for spinal metastases: a comparison study with a regimen of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Oncotarget 2017; 8:112330-112340. [PMID: 29348828 PMCID: PMC5762513 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Under the existing condition that the optimum radiotherapy regimen for spinal metastases is controversial, this study investigates the benefits of dose escalation by image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) with 60-66 Gy in 20-30 fractions for spinal metastases. RESULTS In the dose-escalation group, each D50 of planning gross tumor volume (PGTV) was above 60 Gy and each Dmax of spinal cord planning organ at risk volume (PRV) was below 48 Gy. The median biological effective dose (BED) of Dmax of spinal cord was lower in the dose-escalation group compared with that in the 30-Gy group (69.70 Gy vs. 83.16 Gy, p < 0.001). After one month and three months of the radiotherapy, pain responses were better in the dose-escalation group than those in the 30-Gy group (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024), and the complete pain relief rates were respectively 73.69% and 34.29% (p = 0.006), 73.69% and 41.38% (p = 0.028) in two compared groups. In the dose-escalation group, there is a trend of a longer duration of pain relief, a longer overall survival and a lower incidence of acute radiation toxicities. No late radiation toxicities were observed in both groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS Dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes, including pain response, duration of pain relief, radiation toxicities and overall survival, were compared among twenty-five metastatic spinal lesions irradiated with the dose-escalation regimen and among forty-four lesions treated with the 30-Gy regimen. CONCLUSIONS Conventionally-fractionated IG-IMRT for spinal metastases could escalate dose to the vertebral lesions while sparing the spinal cord, achieving a better pain relief without increasing radiation complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinlan He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Xingchen Peng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Baofeng Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Ping Ai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| | - Min Yao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospitals and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH 44106, United States
| | - Nianyong Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Sodji Q, Kaminski J, Willey C, Kim N, Mourad W, Vender J, Dasher B. Management of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. South Med J 2017; 110:586-593. [DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000000700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
49
|
Halfdanarson TR, Hogan WJ, Madsen BE. Emergencies in Hematology and Oncology. Mayo Clin Proc 2017; 92:609-641. [PMID: 28385197 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Accepted: 02/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The development of medical emergencies related to the underlying disease or as a result of complications of therapy are common in patients with hematologic or solid tumors. These oncological emergencies can occur as an initial presentation or in a patient with an established diagnosis and are encountered in all medical care settings, ranging from primary care to the emergency department and various subspecialty environments. Therefore, it is critically important that all physicians have a working knowledge of the potential oncological emergencies that may present in their practice and how to provide the most effective care without delay. This article reviews the most common oncological emergencies and provides practical guidance for initial management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Bo E Madsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Karlsson P, Lundstedt D. Radiotherapy for Metastatic Lesions. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|