Esophagus in-field: A new predictor for esophagitis

Dose-Volume Predictors for Radiation Esophagitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Our objective was to assess the incidence and dose-volume predictors of radiation esophagitis (RE) in patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients who received intensity modulated radiation therapy (RT) at the chest wall, the supraclavicular/infraclavicular fossa, level II axilla, and/or the internal mammary chain after mastectomy were included. The prescribed dose was 43.5 Gy in 15 fractions. RE was evaluated weekly during RT and at 1 and 2 weeks, followed by 3 and 6 months after RT, and was graded according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. The esophagus was contoured from the lower border level of the cricoid cartilage to the lower margin of the aortic arch. Esophageal total volume, mean dose, maximum dose, and the relative volumes (RV) and absolute volumes (AV) receiving at least 5 to 45 Gy by 5-Gy increments (RV5-RV45 and AV5-AV45) were evaluated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine risk factors for RE, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to identify the thresholds of esophageal dosimetric parameters.

RESULTS

In total, 298 patients were included between May 8, 2020, and January 5, 2022 (minimum post-RT follow-up: 6 months). Grade 2 and 3 RE incidence was 40.9% (122/298) and 0.3% (1/298), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 RE was observed. Esophageal RV20-RV40 and AV35-AV40 were significantly associated with the risk of grade ≥2 RE after adjusting for tumor laterality and internal mammary nodal irradiation. RV25 and AV35 were optimum dose-volume predictors for grade ≥2 RE at thresholds 20% for RV25 (35.9% vs 60.9%; P = .04) and 0.27 mL for AV35 (31.0% vs 54.6%; P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

RE is common in patients with breast cancer undergoing hypofractionated regional nodal irradiation. Maintaining the upper esophageal V25 at <20% and V35 at <0.27 mL may decrease the risk of RE.

Dosimetric benefits of adaptive radiation therapy for patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Daily adaptive radiation therapy (ART) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) lowers organs at risk exposure while maintaining the planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Thus, ART allows an isotoxic approach with increased doses to the PTV that could improve local tumor control. Herein we evaluate daily online ART strategies regarding their impact on relevant dose-volume metrics.

METHODS

Daily cone-beam CTs (1 × n = 28, 1 × n = 29, 11 × n = 30) of 13 stage III NSCLC patients were converted into synthetic CTs (sCTs). Treatment plans (TPs) were created retrospectively on the first-fraction sCTs (sCT₁) and subsequently transferred unaltered to the sCTs of the remaining fractions of each patient (sCT_2-n) (IGRT scenario). Two additional TPs were generated on sCT_2-n: one minimizing the lung-dose while preserving the D_95%(PTV) (isoeffective scenario), the other escalating the D_95%(PTV) with a constant V_20Gy(lung_ipsilateral) (isotoxic scenario).

RESULTS

Compared to the original TPs predicted dose, the median D_95%(PTV) in the IGRT scenario decreased by 1.6 Gy ± 4.2 Gy while the V_20Gy(lung_ipsilateral) increased in median by 1.1% ± 4.4%. The isoeffective scenario preserved the PTV coverage and reduced the median V_20Gy(lung_ipsilateral) by 3.1% ± 3.6%. Furthermore, the median V_5%(heart) decreased by 2.9% ± 6.4%. With an isotoxic prescription, a median dose-escalation to the gross target volume of 10.0 Gy ± 8.1 Gy without increasing the V_20Gy(lung_ipsilateral) and V_5%(heart) was feasible.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that even without reducing safety margins, ART can reduce lung-doses, while still reaching adequate target coverage or escalate target doses without increasing ipsilateral lung exposure. Clinical benefits by means of toxicity and local control of both strategies should be evaluated in prospective clinical trials.

A prediction model for dosimetric-based lung adaptive radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Anatomical changes occurred during the treatment course of radiation therapy for lung cancer patients may introduce clinically unacceptable dosimetric deviations from the planned dose. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can compensate these dosimetric deviations in subsequent treatments via plan adaption. Determining whether and when to trigger plan adaption during the treatment course is essential to the effectiveness and efficiency of ART. In this study, we aimed to develop a prediction model as an auxiliary decision-making tool for lung ART to identify the patients with intrathoracic anatomical changes that would potentially benefit from the plan adaptions during the treatment course.

METHODS

Seventy-one pairs of weekly cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) and planning CT (pCT) from 17 advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients were enrolled in this study. To assess the dosimetric impacts brought by anatomical changes observed on each CBCT, dose distribution of the original treatment plan on the CBCT anatomy was calculated on a virtual CT generated by deforming the corresponding pCT to the CBCT, and compared to that of the original plan. A replan was deemed needed for the CBCT anatomy once the recalculated dose distribution violated our dosimetric-based trigger criteria. A three-dimensional region of significant anatomical changes (region of interest, ROI) between each CBCT and the corresponding pCT was identified and 16 morphological features of the ROI were extracted. Additionally, eight features from the overlapped volume histograms (OVHs) of patient anatomy were extracted for each patient to characterize the patient specific anatomy. Based on the 24 extracted features and the evaluated replanning needs of the pCT-CBCT pairs, a nonlinear supporting vector machine was used to build a prediction model to identify the anatomical changes on CBCTs that would trigger plan adaptions. The most relevant features were selected using the sequential backward selection (SBS) algorithm and a shuffling-and-splitting validation scheme was used for model evaluation.

RESULTS

Fifty-Five CBCT-pCT pairs were identified of having a ROI, among which 21 CBCT anatomies required plan adaptions. For these 21 positive cases, statistically significant improvements in the sparing of lung, esophagus and spinal cord were achieved by plan adaptions. A high model performance of 0.929 AUC and 0.851 accuracy was achieved with six selected features including five ROI shape features and one OVH feature. Without involving the OVH features in the feature selection process, the mean AUC and accuracy of the model significantly decreased to 0.826 and 0.779, respectively. Further investigation showed that poor prediction performance with AUC of 0.76 was achieved by the univariate model in solving this binary classification task.

CONCLUSION

We built a prediction model based on the features of patient anatomy and the anatomical changes captured by on-treatment CBCT imaging to trigger plan adaption for lung cancer patients. This model effectively associated the anatomical changes with the dosimetric impacts for lung ART. This model can be a promising tool to assist the clinicians in making decisions for plan adaptions during the treatment courses. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Gut Microbiota Characteristics Are Associated With Severity of Acute Radiation-Induced Esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Acute radiation-induced esophagitis (ARIE) is one of the most debilitating complications in patients who receive thoracic radiotherapy, especially those with esophageal cancer (EC). There is little known about the impact of the characteristics of gut microbiota on the initiation and severity of ARIE.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Gut microbiota samples of EC patients undergoing radiotherapy (n = 7) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (n = 42) were collected at the start, middle, and end of the radiotherapy regimen. Assessment of patient-reported ARIE was also performed. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, changes of the gut microbial community during the treatment regimen and correlations of the gut microbiota characteristics with the severity of ARIE were investigated.

RESULTS

There were significant associations of several properties of the gut microbiota with the severity of ARIE. The relative abundance of several genera in the phylum Proteobacteria increased significantly as mucositis severity increased. The predominant genera had characteristic changes during the treatment regimen, such as an increase of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria including Streptococcus. Patients with severe ARIE had significantly lower alpha diversity and a higher abundance of Fusobacterium before radiotherapy, but patients with mild ARIE were enriched in Klebsiella, Roseburia, Veillonella, Prevotella_9, Megasphaera, and Ruminococcus_2. A model combining these genera had the best performance in prediction of severe ARIE (area under the curve: 0.907).

CONCLUSION

The characteristics of gut microbiota before radiotherapy were associated with subsequent ARIE severity. Microbiota-based strategies have potential use for the early prediction of subsequent ARIE and for the selection of interventions that may prevent severe ARIE.

Comparison of dose volumetric parameters of oesophagus in the radiation treatment of carcinoma breast with and without oesophagus delineation

Aim:

There are only limited studies available in literature that discuss methods to reduce the oesophageal dose and acute oesophagitis during breast cancer radiotherapy. The aim of this study is to compare dose volumetric parameters of oesophagus in radiation treatment of breast with and without oesophagus delineation.

Methods:

Treatment plans of 44 patients, who underwent chest wall and supraclavicular fossa irradiation, were selected for the study. Oesophagus was later delineated and treatment replanned using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) considering oesophagus as an organ at risk (OAR). The dose prescribed was 40 Gy/15 fractions to the planning target volume (PTV). Dose volumetric parameters of oesophagus such as maximum dose (Dmax), mean dose (Dmean), the percentage of oesophagus volume receiving ≥15Gy (V15), ≥25Gy(V25), ≥33Gy(V33) and ipsilateral lung volume parameters V4, V8 and V16 were compared with already executed plans in which oesophagus was not delineated.

Results:

Contouring the oesophagus as an OAR as a part of the radiotherapy treatment for Carcinoma Breast resulted in statistically significant reduction in dose to the oesophagus. No statistically significant change was found in the ipsilateral lung volume parameters. No compromise in plan quality was required as evident from the statistically non-significant differences in Homogeneity index and Conformity index.

Findings:

3DCRT planning with oesophagus delineation can be considered as a method to reduce oesophageal dose and the acute oesophageal toxicity during radiotherapy for carcinoma breast.

A Case of Refractory Esophageal Ulcer Caused by Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

A 77-year-old man who underwent radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma 6 months prior consulted for esophageal obstruction. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an esophageal ulcer caused by radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. He was treated with dietary counseling and vonoprazan. After 9 months, the ulcer improved but a moderate stenosis remained. Several factors such as high fraction size, history of chemotherapy, and stress associated with food intake might involve in the development of a radiation-associated ulcer. Opportunities to choose radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma may increase, so we hypothesize that esophageal ulcers might be a complication that should be noted associated with this therapy.

Dosimetric parameters associated with radiation-induced esophagitis in breast cancer patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Rates of acute esophagitis in breast cancer patients undergoing regional nodal irradiation (RNI) are under-reported. We set to identify esophageal dose-volume constraints associated with grade 2 esophagitis (G2E). We hypothesized that the G2E rate was higher with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

We identified patients that received RNI (50 Gy/25 fractions) from 1/2013 to 6/2019. We retrospectively contoured the esophagus in a consistent manner and recorded esophageal mean dose, max dose, and V10-V50. Our primary endpoint was the G2E rate. Receiver operating characteristics curves analysis (e.g., Youden's J statistic) were used to determine the cutpoints for the dosimetric parameters which were then tested in logistic regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 531 patients (50% left-sided; 41% IMRT; 16.2% G2E). G2E was significantly higher in IMRT vs. 3DCRT patients (23.6% vs. 10.9%, p < 0.0001). All esophageal dosimetric parameters were significantly associated with G2E after adjusting for age and laterality. The cutpoints for esophageal mean dose, V10 and V20 were 11 Gy, 30%, and 15%, respectively. The associations between the dichotomized dose-volume parameters and G2E were OR = 3.82 (95% CI 2.28-6.40, p < 0.0001) for esophageal mean dose, OR = 5.37 (95% CI 3.01-9.58, p < 0.0001) for esophageal V10, and OR = 3.23 (95% CI 1.93-5.41, p < 0.0001) for esophageal V20.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving RNI with modern techniques, we found that G2E occurs in >15%, and more frequently with IMRT. These data strongly support the routine contouring of the esophagus in RNI planning, and our constraints should be incorporated in future prospective protocols of RNI.

Predictive Modeling of Thoracic Radiotherapy Toxicity and the Potential Role of Serum Alpha-2-Macroglobulin

Background: To investigate the impact of alpha-2-macroglobulin (A2M), a suspected intrinsic radioprotectant, on radiation pneumonitis and esophagitis using multifactorial predictive models. Materials and Methods: Baseline A2M levels were obtained for 258 patients prior to thoracic radiotherapy (RT). Dose-volume characteristics were extracted from treatment plans. Spearman's correlation (Rs) test was used to correlate clinical and dosimetric variables with toxicities. Toxicity prediction models were built using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression on 1,000 bootstrapped datasets. Results: Grade ≥2 esophagitis and pneumonitis developed in 61 (23.6%) and 36 (14.0%) patients, respectively. The median A2M level was 191 mg/dL (range: 94-511). Never/former/current smoker status was 47 (18.2%)/179 (69.4%)/32 (12.4%). We found a significant negative univariate correlation between baseline A2M levels and esophagitis (Rs = -0.18/p = 0.003) and between A2M and smoking status (Rs = 0.13/p = 0.04). Further significant parameters for grade ≥2 esophagitis included age (Rs = -0.32/p < 0.0001), chemotherapy use (Rs = 0.56/p < 0.0001), dose per fraction (Rs = -0.57/p < 0.0001), total dose (Rs = 0.35/p < 0.0001), and several other dosimetric variables with Rs > 0.5 (p < 0.0001). The only significant non-dosimetric parameter for grade ≥2 pneumonitis was sex (Rs = -0.32/p = 0.037) with higher risk for women. For pneumonitis D15 (lung) (Rs = 0.19/p = 0.006) and D45 (heart) (Rs = 0.16/p = 0.016) had the highest correlation. LASSO models applied on the validation data were statistically significant and resulted in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 (esophagitis) and 0.78 (pneumonitis). Multivariate predictive models did not require A2M to reach maximum predictive power. Conclusion: This is the first study showing a likely association of higher baseline A2M values with lower risk of radiation esophagitis and with smoking status. However, the baseline A2M level was not a significant risk factor for radiation pneumonitis.

Dose-volume effects of breast cancer radiation therapy on the risk of second oesophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between oesophagus dose-volume distribution and long-term risk of oesophageal cancer after radiation therapy for breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a case-control study nested within a cohort of 289,748 ≥5-year survivors of female breast cancer treated in 1943-2003 in five countries, doses to the second primary cancer (D_SPC) and individual dose-volume histograms (DVH) to the entire oesophagus were reconstructed for 252 oesophageal cancer cases and 488 matched controls (median follow-up time: 13, range: 5-37 years). Using conditional logistic regression, we estimated excess odds ratios (EOR) of oesophageal cancer associated with DVH metrics. We also investigated whether DVH metrics confounded or modified D_SPC-related -risk estimates.

RESULTS

Among the DVH metrics evaluated, median dose (D_median) to the entire oesophagus had the best statistical performance for estimating risk of all histological types combined (EOR/Gy = 0.071, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.018 to 0.206). For squamous cell carcinoma, the most common subtype, the EOR/Gy for D_median increased by 31% (95% CI: 3% to 205%) for each increment of 10% of V30 (p = 0.02). Adjusting for DVH metrics did not materially change the EOR/Gy for D_SPC, but there was a borderline significant positive interaction between D_SPC and V30 (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

This first study investigating the relationship between oesophagus dose-volume distribution and oesophageal cancer risk showed an increased risk per Gy for D_median with larger volumes irradiated at high doses. While current techniques allows better oesophagus sparing, constraints applied to D_median and V30 could potentially further reduce the risk of oesophageal cancer.

Clinical, dosimetric, and position factors for radiation-induced acute esophagitis in intensity-modulated (chemo)radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to estimate the relation between acute esophagitis (AE) and clinical, dosimetric, and position factors in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving intensity-modulated (chemo)radiotherapy.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to identify factors associated with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events grade 2 or worse AE (AE2+). A multivariable model was established including patient- and treatment-related variables and esophageal dose–volume histogram parameters. The esophagus was divided according to physiological anatomy, and logistic regression was used to analyze the position parameter for its correlation with AE2+.

Results

The incidence of AE2+ was 27.5%. All models included gender, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT), position parameter, and one of the dosimetric variables. The model with mean dose showed the best goodness of fit. Gender (OR=2.47, P=0.014), CCRT (OR=3.67, P=0.015), mean dose (OR=1.33, P<0.001), and maximum radiation position (OR=1.65, P=0.016) were significantly related to AE2+.

Conclusion

Gender, concurrent chemotherapy, maximum radiation position, and mean dose were independent risk factors for AE2+. The upper part of the esophagus showed a higher sensitivity to radiation toxicity.

Revisiting the dose constraints for head and neck OARs in the current era of IMRT

Head and neck cancer poses a particular challenge in radiation therapy, whilst being an effective treatment modality it requires very high doses of radiation to provide effective therapy. This is further complicated by the fact that the head and neck region contains a large number of radiosensitive tissues, often resulting in patients experiencing debilitating normal tissue complications. In the era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatments can be delivered using non-uniform dose distributions selectively aimed at reducing the dose to critical organs-at-risk while still adequately covering the tumor target. Dose-volume constraints for the different risk organs play a vital role in one's ability to devise the best IMRT treatment plan for a head and neck cancer patient. To this end, it is pivotal to have access to the latest and most relevant dose constraints available and as such the goal of this review is to provide a summary of suggested dose-volume constraints for head and neck cancer RT that have been published after the QUANTEC reports were made available in early 2010.

Protein calorie malnutrition, nutritional intervention and personalized cancer care

Cancer patients often experience weight loss caused by protein calorie malnutrition (PCM) during the course of the disease or treatment. PCM is expressed as severe if the patient has two or more of the following characteristics: obvious significant muscle wasting, loss of subcutaneous fat; nutritional intake of <50% of recommended intake for 2 weeks or more; bedridden or otherwise significantly reduced functional capacity; weight loss of >2% in 1 week, 5% in 1 month, or 7.5% in 3 months. Cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome (CACS) is a multifactorial condition of advanced PCM associated with underlying illness (in this case cancer) and is characterized by loss of muscle with or without loss of fat mass. Cachexia is defined as weight loss of more than 5% of body weight in 12 months or less in the presence of chronic disease. Hence with a chronic illness on board even a small amount of weight loss can open the door to cachexia. These nutritional challenges can lead to severe morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. In the clinic, the application of personalized medicine and the ability to withstand the toxic effects of anti-cancer therapies can be optimized when the patient is in nutritional homeostasis and is free of anorexia and cachexia. Routine assessment of nutritional status and appropriate intervention are essential components of the effort to alleviate effects of malnutrition on quality of life and survival of patients.

Different definitions of esophagus influence esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer patients administered simultaneous integrated boost versus standard-dose radiation therapy

We aim to evaluate whether different definitions of esophagus (DEs) impact on the esophageal toxicity prediction for esophageal cancer (EC) patients administered intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-IMRT) vs. standard-dose IMRT (SD-IMRT). The esophagus for 21 patients diagnosed with primary EC were defined in the following four ways: the whole esophagus, including the tumor (ESO_whole); ESO_whole within the treatment field (ESO_infield); ESO_infield, excluding the tumor (ESO_{infield-tumor}) and ESO_whole, excluding the tumor (ESO_whole-tumor). The difference in the dose variation, acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) of four DEs were compared. We found that the mean esophageal dose for ESO_whole, ESO_infield, ESO_{infield-tumor} and ESO_whole-tumor were increased by 7.2 Gy, 10.9 Gy, 4.6 Gy and 2.0 Gy, respectively, in the SIB-IMRT plans. Radiobiological models indicated that a grade ≥ 2 AET was 2.9%, 3.1%, 2.2% and 1.6% higher on average with the Kwint model and 14.6%, 13.2%, 7.2% and 3.4% higher with the Wijsman model for the four DEs. A grade ≥ 3 AET increased by 4.3%, 7.2%, 4.2% and 1.2%, respectively. Additionally, the predicted LET increased by 0.15%, 0.39%, 1.2 × 10⁻²% and 1.5 × 10⁻³%. Our study demonstrates that different DEs influence the esophageal toxicity prediction for EC patients administered SIB-IMRT vs. SD-IMRT treatment.

Persistence of dysphagia and odynophagia after mediastinal radiation and chemotherapy in patients with lung cancer or lymphoma

Esophageal symptoms are common during radiation and chemotherapy. It is unclear how often these symptoms persist after therapy. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 320 adults treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer (84), lung cancer (109), or Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (127) who were disease-free at 10-14 months after therapy. Treatment included chemotherapy with or without nonmediastinal radiation therapy (150 patients), chemotherapy plus sequential mediastinal radiation therapy (MRT) (48 patients), chemotherapy plus concurrent MRT (61 patients), or non-MRT only (61 patients). Proton pump inhibitor use was documented. All treatment groups had similar prevalence of the esophageal symptom of heartburn before therapy. Rates were higher during treatment in those who received MRT with or without chemotherapy, but declined by 10-14 months after treatment. However, low baseline rates of dysphagia (4%) and odynophagia (2%) increased significantly after combined chemotherapy and MRT to 72% for dysphagia and 62% for odynophagia (P < 0.01) during treatment and stayed significantly elevated over baseline with 27% of the patients having dysphagia and 11% having odynophagia at 10-14 months after treatment. The use of proton pump inhibitors by patients who had MRT with chemotherapy was significantly increased during and after treatment (P = 0.002). Dysphagia, odynophagia and the use of proton pump inhibitors were significantly more common both during and after treatment than before treatment in patients who received both chemotherapy and mediastinal radiation. Our data highlight the important challenge for clinicians of managing patients with lung cancer and lymphoma who have persistent esophageal problems, particularly dysphagia and odynophagia, at approximately 1 year after treatment.

Results of a Single Institution Experience with Dose-Escalated Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

We determined factors associated with morbidity and outcomes of a series of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy at the University of Pittsburgh Lung Cancer Program.

Methods and materials

The records of 170 stage III NSCLC patients treated with definitive intent were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received four-dimensional CT simulation scan and had respiratory gating if tumor movement exceeded 5 mm. Overall survival (OS), locoregional control (LRC), and freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) were calculated using log-rank and Cox regression analysis.

Results

For the present series of patients, median follow-up was 36.6 months, median survival 27.4 months, and the 2- and 4-year OS was 56.0 and 30.7%, respectively. The 4-year LRC and FFDM were 43.9 and 40.7%, respectively. No benefit was associated with irradiation doses above 66 Gy in OS (p = 0.586), LRC (p = 0.440), or FFDM (p = 0.230). On univariate analysis, variables associated with worse survival included: clinical stage IIIB (p = 0.037), planning target volume (PTV) over 450 cc (p < 0.001), heart V₃₀ over 40% (p = −0.048), and esophageal mean dose over 20% (p = 0.024), V₅ (p = −0.015), and V₆₀ (p = −0.011). On multivariable analysis, PTV above 450 cc (52.2 vs. 25.3 months, p < 0.001) and esophageal V₆₀ >20% (43.8 vs. 21.3 months, p = −0.01) were associated with lower survival. Grade 2 or higher acute lung toxicity and esophagitis were detected in 9.5 and 59.7%, respectively of patients. Grade 2 or higher acute lung toxicity was reduced if lung V₅ was ≤65 (7.4 vs. 23.8%, p = 0.03). Grade 2 or higher acute esophagitis was reduced if V₆₀ ≤ 20% (62 vs. 81.3%, p = 0.018). The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy was more frequent in stage IIIB compared to stage IIIA patients (56.5 vs. 39.5%, p = 0.048) and was associated with a higher lung V₅ and V₁₀.

Conclusion

The outcomes of a program of dose-escalated chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC patients were consistent with other studies and showed no benefit to radiation doses above 66 Gy. Furthermore, maintaining low esophageal V₆₀ and lung V₅ were associated with lower morbidity and mortality.

Radiobiological evaluation of simultaneously dose-escalated versus non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare the radiobiological response between simultaneously dose-escalated and non-escalated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (DE-IMRT and NE-IMRT) for patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer (UTEC) using radiobiological evaluation.

METHODS

Computed tomography simulation data sets for 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC were used in this study. DE-IMRT plan with an escalated dose of 64.8 Gy/28 fractions to the gross tumor volume (GTV) and involved lymph nodes from 25 patients pathologically diagnosed with primary UTEC, was compared to an NE-IMRT plan of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions. Dose-volume metrics, tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability for the lung and spinal cord were compared. In addition, the risk of acute esophageal toxicity (AET) and late esophageal toxicity (LET) were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with NE-IMRT plan, we found the DE-IMRT plan resulted in a 14.6 Gy dose escalation to the GTV. The tumor control was predicted to increase by 31.8%, 39.1%, and 40.9% for three independent TCP models. The predicted incidence of radiation pneumonitis was similar (3.9% versus 3.6%), and the estimated risk of radiation-induced spinal cord injury was extremely low (<0.13%) in both groups. Regarding the esophageal toxicities, the estimated grade ≥2 and grade ≥3 AET predicted by the Kwint model were increased by 2.5% and 3.8%. Grade ≥2 AET predicted using the Wijsman model was increased by 14.9%. The predicted incidence of LET was low (<0.51%) in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Radiobiological evaluation reveals that the DE-IMRT dosing strategy is feasible for patients with UTEC, with significant gains in tumor control and minor or clinically acceptable increases in radiation-induced toxicities.

HSPB1 polymorphisms might be associated with radiation-induced damage risk in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

Several studies investigating the association between heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1) polymorphisms and radiation-induced damage in lung cancer patients administrated with radiotherapy have derived conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between the HSPB1 genes' (rs2868370 and rs2868371) polymorphisms and the risk of radiation-induced damage in lung cancer patients. After an electronic literature search, four articles including six studies were found to be eligible for this meta-analysis. No association was observed between rs2868370 genotypes and radiation-induced damage risk. However, rs2868371 showed a statistically increased risk of radiation-induced damage under CC vs. CG/GG model (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI = 1.10-2.29). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity showed that the genotypes of rs2868371 were also associated with a significantly increased risk of radiation-induced damage in CC vs. CG/GG model (OR = 1.86, 95 % CI = 1.21-2.83) among mixed ethnicities which are mainly comprised of white people. When the data was stratified by organ-damaged, a significant association was only observed in the esophagus group (OR = 2.94, 95 % CI = 1.35-6.37, for CC vs. CG/GG model). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that the rs2868371 genotypes of HSPB1 might be associated with radiation-induced esophagus damage risk, especially in Caucasians but not in the Asian population.

Advances in dosimetry and biological predictors of radiation-induced esophagitis

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the research progress about the dosimetry and biological predictors of radiation-induced esophagitis.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review addressing radiation esophagitis in the treatment of lung cancer published between January 2009 and May 2015 in the PubMed full-text database index systems.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight eligible documents were included in the final analysis. Many clinical factors were related to the risk of radiation esophagitis, such as elder patients, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and the intense radiotherapy regimen (hyperfractionated radiotherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy). The parameters including Dmax, Dmean, V20, V30, V50, and V55 may be valuable in predicting the occurrence of radiation esophagitis in patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Genetic variants in inflammation-related genes are also associated with radiation-induced toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Dosimetry and biological factors of radiation-induced esophagitis provide clinical information to decrease its occurrence and grade during radiotherapy. More prospective studies are warranted to confirm their prediction efficacy.

Multivariable normal-tissue complication modeling of acute esophageal toxicity in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated (chemo-)radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The majority of normal-tissue complication probability (NTCP) models for acute esophageal toxicity (AET) in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (AS-NSCLC) patients treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy are based on three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). Due to distinct dosimetric characteristics of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), 3D-CRT based models need revision. We established a multivariable NTCP model for AET in 149 AS-NSCLC patients undergoing IMRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An established model selection procedure was used to develop an NTCP model for Grade ⩾2 AET (53 patients) including clinical and esophageal dose-volume histogram parameters.

RESULTS

The NTCP model predicted an increased risk of Grade ⩾2 AET in case of: concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCR) [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 14.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.70-42.19; p<0.001], increasing mean esophageal dose [Dmean; OR 1.12 per Gy increase, 95% CI 1.06-1.19; p<0.001], female patients (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.36-8.17; p=0.008), and ⩾cT3 (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.12-6.50; p=0.026). The AUC was 0.82 and the model showed good calibration.

CONCLUSIONS

A multivariable NTCP model including CCR, Dmean, clinical tumor stage and gender predicts Grade ⩾2 AET after IMRT for AS-NSCLC. Prior to clinical introduction, the model needs validation in an independent patient cohort.

Acute phase response before treatment predicts radiation esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Radiation esophagitis (RE) represents an inflammatory reaction to radiation therapy (RT). We hypothesized that aspects of the physiologic acute phase response (APR) predicts RE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 285 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive radiation. The primary analysis was the association of pretreatment lab values reflective of the APR with symptomatic (grade ⩾ 2) RE. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to test associations of clinical and pretreatment lab values with RE. Optimal cutpoints and multivariable risk stratification groupings were determined via recursive partitioning analysis.

RESULTS

Pretreatment platelet counts were higher and hemoglobin levels lower in patients who developed RE (P<0.05). Based on these two pre-treatment risk factors, an APR score was defined as 0 (no risk factors), 1 (either risk factor), or 2 (both risk factors). APR score was significantly associated with RE in both univariate (OR = 2.3 for each point, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-3.4, P = 0.001) and multivariate (OR = 2.1, 95% CI 1.3-3.4, P = 0.002) analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The APR score may represent a novel metric to predict RE. However, pending validation in an independent dataset, caution is advised when interpreting these results given their retrospective and thus exploratory nature.

Dosimetric and clinical predictors of acute esophagitis in lung cancer patients in Turkey treated with radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical and dosimetric factors associated with acute esophagitis (AE) in lung cancer patients treated with conformal radiotherapy (RT) in Turkey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective review 104 lung cancer patients were examined. Esophagitis grades were verified weekly during treatment, and at 1 week, and 1 and 2 months afterwards. The clinical parameters included patient age, gender, tumor pathology, number of chemotherapy treatments before RT, concurrent chemotherapy, radiation dose, tumor response to RT, tumor localization, interruption of RT, weight loss, tumor and nodal stage and tumor volume. The following dosimetric parameters were analyzed for correlation of AE: The maximum (Dmax) and mean (Dmean) doses delivered to the esophagus, the percentage of esophagus volume receiving ≥10 Gy (V10), ≥20 Gy (V20), ≥30 Gy (V30), ≥35 Gy (V35), ≥40 Gy (V40), ≥45 Gy (V45), ≥50 Gy (V50) and ≥60 Gy (V60).

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients (52.9%) developed AE. Maximum grades of AE were recorded: Grade 1 in 51 patients (49%), and Grade 2 in 4 patients (3.8%). Clinical factors had no statistically significant influence on the incidence of AE. In terms of dosimetric findings, correlation analyses demonstrated a significant association between AE and Dmax (>5117 cGy), Dmean (>1487 cGy) and V10-60 (percentage of volume receiving >10 to 60 Gy). The most significant relationship between RT and esophagitis were in Dmax (>5117 cGy) (p=0.002) and percentage of esophageal volume receiving >30 Gy (V30>31%) (p=0.008) in the logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum dose esophagus greater than 5117 cGy and approximately one third (31%) of the esophageal volume receiving >30 Gy was the most statistically significant predictive factor associated with esophagitis due to RT.

Prognostic parameters for acute esophagus toxicity in intensity modulated radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to correlate clinical and dosimetric variables with acute esophageal toxicity (AET) following Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition, timeline of AET was reported.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

153 patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with 66 Gy/2.75 Gy/24 fractions of radiotherapy and concurrent daily low dose cisplatin were selected. Medical records and treatments of these patients were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum AET grade ≥2 and maximum grade 3 were the endpoints of this study. Dates for onset, maximum and recovery (to baseline) of AET were reported. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied to correlate clinical, tumor, dosimetric and chemotherapy dose variables to AET grade ≥2 and grade 3.

RESULTS

AET grade 2 occurred in 37% and grade 3 in 20% of the patients. The median onset of AET was around day 15 for all grades. The median onset of the maximum grade was day 30 for both grades 2 and 3. The median duration was 43 days for grade 1, 50 days for grade 2 and >80 days for grade 3. Of the grade 3 AET patients, 48% recovered within 3 months. Esophagus V50, ethnic background, and the number of cisplatin administrations were significantly correlated with grade 3 AET.

CONCLUSIONS

For NSCLC patients treated with concurrent chemotherapy and IMRT A higher number of cisplatin administrations, non-Caucasian background and higher V50oes were associated with grade 3 AET. The median onset of AET grade 3 is 15 days after the start of treatment, maximized at day 30, with a median duration of >80 days.

Acute radiation esophagitis caused by high-dose involved field radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and vinorelbine for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose of this study is to obtain dose-volume histogram (DVH) predictors and threshold values for radiation esophagitis caused by high-dose involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) with concurrent chemotherapy in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty-two patients treated by 66 Gy/33 Fr, 72 Gy/36 Fr, and 78 Gy/39 Fr thoracic radiotherapy without elective nodal irradiation plus concurrent cisplatin and vinorelvine were reviewed. Acute radiation esophagitis was evaluated according to common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0, and correlations between grade 2 or worse radiation esophagitis and DVH parameters were investigated. Grade 0-1, 2, 3, and 4-5 of radiation esophagitis were seen in 11 (34.4%), 20 (62.5%), 1 (3.1%), and 0 (0%) of the patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that whole esophagus V35 is a predictor of radiation esophagitis (OR = 0.74 [95%CI; 0.60-0.91], p = 0.006). There is a significant difference (38.4% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.027) in the cumulative rates of acute esophagitis according to V35 values of more than 20% versus less. As compared with other factors concerning patient and tumor and treatment factors, V35 ≤ 20% of the esophagus was an independent predictor (HR 5 0.29 [95%CI; 0.09-0.85], p 5 0.025). In conclusion, whole esophagus V35 < 20% is proposed in high-dose IFRT with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III NSCLC patients.

Relating acute esophagitis to radiotherapy dose using FDG-PET in concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To correlate radiotherapy (RT) dose to acute esophagitis (AE) by means of FDG-PET scans acquired after concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cCRT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated with 24 × 2.75 Gy were selected on presence of a post-RT PET (PET(post)) scan acquired within 3 months after cCRT. The value of PET(post) in relation to AE was evaluated by comparing the mean esophageal SUV of the highest 50% (mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket) between gr < 2 and gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose on the esophagus wall was correlated to the SUV and modeled using a power-law fit. The Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model was used to predict gr ≥ 2AE. The local dose-response relation was used in the LKB model to calculate the EUD. Resulting prediction accuracy was compared to D(mean), V(35), V(55) and V(60).

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included (gr < 2 = 25, gr ≥ 2=57). The mathematical left angle bracket SUV(50%) mathematical right angle bracket ≥ was significantly higher for gr ≥ 2AE (2.2 vs. 2.6, p < 0.01). The LKB parameters (95% CI) were n = 0.130 (0.120-0.141), m = 0.25 (0.13-0.85) and TD(50) = 50.4 Gy (37.5-55.4), which resulted in improved predictability of AE compared to other predictors.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal uptake of FDG post-cCRT reflects AE severity. Predictability of grade ≥ 2AE was improved by using the local dose-SUV response model, with narrow confidence intervals for the optimized LKB parameters.

Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of the transforming growth factor β1 gene and the risk of severe radiation esophagitis in patients with lung cancer

PURPOSE

We investigated the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) gene and the risk of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity (RE) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-seven NSCLC patients with available genomic DNA samples and mostly treated with intensity modulated radio(chemo)therapy from 2003 to 2006 were used as a test dataset and 101 NSCLC patients treated with 3-dimensional conformal radio(chemo)therapy from 1998 to 2002 were used as a validation set. We genotyped three SNPs of the TGFβ1 gene (rs1800469:C-509T, rs1800471:G915C, and rs1982073:T869C) by the polymerase chain reaction restriction fragment length polymorphism method.

RESULTS

In the test dataset, the CT/TT genotypes of TGFβ1 rs1800469:C-509T were associated with a statistically significant higher risk of RE grade⩾3 in univariate (P=0.026) and multivariate analysis (P=0.045) when compared with the CC genotype. These results were again observed in both univariate (P=0.045) and multivariate (P=0.023) analysis in the validation dataset.

CONCLUSION

We found and validated that the TGFβ1 rs1800469:C-509T genotype is associated with severe RE. This response marker may be used for guiding therapy intensity in an individual patient, which would further the goal of individualized therapy.

Functional promoter rs2868371 variant of HSPB1 associates with radiation-induced esophageal toxicity in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with radio(chemo)therapy

PURPOSE

We investigated the association between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the heat shock protein beta-1 (HSPB1) gene and the risk of radiation-induced esophageal toxicity (RIET) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experimental dataset comprised 120 NSCLC patients who were treated with radio(chemo)therapy between 2005 and 2009, when novel radiation techniques were implemented at MD Anderson. The validation dataset comprised 181 NSCLC patients treated between 1998 and 2004. We genotyped two SNPs of the HSPB1 gene (rs2868370 and rs2868371) by TaqMan assay.

RESULTS

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the experimental dataset showed that the CG/GG genotypes of HSPB1 rs2868371 were associated with significantly lower risk of grade ⩾3 RIET than the CC genotype (univariate hazard ratio [HR] 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.91; P=0.033; multivariate HR 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P=0.045). This difference in risk was replicated in the validation cohort despite the different radiation techniques used during that period.

CONCLUSIONS

The CG/GG genotypes of HSPB1 rs2868371 were associated with lower risk of RIET, compared with the CC genotype in patients with NSCLC treated with radio(chemo)therapy. This finding should be validated in large multi-institutional prospective trials.