Planning the breast boost: How accurately do surgical clips represent the CT seroma?

Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Guided Single-Dose Partial Breast Irradiation: 5-Year Results of the Prospective Single-Arm ABLATIVE Trial

PURPOSE

Preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) can increase accuracy of target volume definition and decrease irradiated volumes compared with postoperative PBI. In the ABLATIVE trial (NCT02316561), 15 of 36 patients achieved pathologic complete response 6 to 8 months after preoperative PBI and breast-conserving surgery (BCS). We now present the 5-year results.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The ABLATIVE trial is a Dutch prospective cohort study conducted in 4 hospitals. Women aged ≥50 years with unifocal, nonlobular breast cancer, estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, and a tumor negative sentinel node were treated between 2015 and 2018 with preoperative single-dose PBI followed by BCS after 6 or 8 months. The primary endpoint was pathologic complete response. Secondary endpoints were annually evaluated oncological outcomes, toxicity, cosmetic outcome (assessed by patients and physicians), and quality of life.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were treated with BCS 6 (n = 15) and 8 (n = 21) months following PBI. Median tumor size was 13 mm (IQR 9-16 mm). After a median follow-up of 5.5 years (IQR, 5.1-6.0), 2 (6%) patients had ipsilateral breast events and 2 (6%) distant metastases. The 5-year overall survival was 94% (95% CI, 87-100). The 5-year cumulative incidence of clinician-reported grade 1/2 breast fibrosis and breast discomfort/pain were 94%/6% and 75%/6%, respectively. The proportion of patients (very) satisfied with the cosmetic results was 89% at baseline and 78% at 5 years. Cosmetic results evaluated using the BCCT.core software were excellent or good in all patients. The 4-year median global quality of life score was 83 (IQR, 67-92), similar to baseline (83; IQR, 75-83; P = .42).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative single-dose PBI and BCS may be an oncologically safe treatment with mild late toxicity and no decline in cosmetic results and quality of life during 5 years of follow-up. This means that preoperative instead of standard postoperative irradiation has the potential to challenge the current clinical practice.

The King is in the altogether: Radiation therapy after oncoplastic breast surgery

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy, and the majority of the patients are diagnosed at an early disease stage. Breast conservation is the preferred locoregional approach, and oncoplastic breast conservation surgery is becoming more popular. This narrative review aims to discuss the challenges and uncertainties in target volume definition for postoperative radiation after these procedures, to improve radiation therapy decisions and encourage multidisciplinary.

Comparison of intraoperative radiotherapy as a boost vs. simultaneously integrated boosts after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer

Background

Currently, there are no data from randomized trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost in women at high risk of local recurrence. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the toxicity and oncological outcome of IORT or simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) with conventional external beam radiotherapy (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS).

Methods

Between 2009 and 2019, patients were treated with a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50 kV photons, followed by WBI 50 Gy in 25 or 40.05 in 15 fractions or WBI 50 Gy with SIB up to 58.80-61.60 Gy in 25-28 fractions. Toxicity was compared after propensity score matching. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A 1:1 propensity-score matching resulted in an IORT + WBI and SIB + WBI cohort of 60 patients, respectively. The median follow-up for IORT + WBI was 43.5 vs. 32 months in the SIB + WBI cohort. Most women had a pT1c tumor: IORT group 33 (55%) vs. 31 (51.7%) SIB group (p = 0.972). The luminal-B immunophenotype was most frequently diagnosed in the IORT group 43 (71.6%) vs. 35 (58.3%) in the SIB group (p = 0.283). The most reported acute adverse event in both groups was radiodermatitis. In the IORT cohort, radiodermatitis was grade 1: 23 (38.3%), grade 2: 26 (43.3%), and grade 3: 6 (10%) vs. SIB cohort grade 1: 3 (5.1%), grade 2: 21 (35%), and grade 3: 7 (11.6%) without a meaningful difference (p = 0.309). Fatigue occurred more frequently in the IORT group (grade 1: 21.7% vs. 6.7%; p = 0.041). In addition, intramammary lymphedema grade 1 occurred significantly more often in the IORT group (11.7% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.026). Both groups showed comparable late toxicity. The 3- and 5-year local control (LC) rates were each 98% in the SIB group vs. 98% and 93% in the IORT group (LS: log rank p = 0.717).

Conclusion

Tumor bed boost using IORT and SIB techniques after BCS shows excellent local control and comparable late toxicity, while IORT application exhibits a moderate increase in acute toxicity. These data should be validated by the expected publication of the prospective randomized TARGIT-B study.

Optimising post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and reconstructive procedures

Surgical techniques for breast cancer have been refined over the past decades to deliver an aesthetic outcome as close as possible to the contralateral intact breast. Current surgery further allows excellent aesthetic outcome even in case of mastectomy, by performing skin sparing or nipple sparing mastectomy in combination with breast reconstruction. In this review we discuss how to optimise post-operative radiation therapy after oncoplastic and breast reconstructive procedures, including dose, fractionation, volumes, surgical margins, and boost application.

Review of Current Accepted Practices in Identification of the Breast Lumpectomy Tumor Bed

Purpose

Of the 260,000 women diagnosed with breast cancer annually in the United States, more than 60% are treated with breast-conserving surgery or lumpectomy, followed by radiation to decrease the chance of local recurrence. More than 70% of breast cancer recurrences are localized to the original tumor cavity. Hence, targeted radiation therapy after lumpectomy is critical for recurrence prevention. With 30,000 patients annually opting for oncoplastic reconstruction of the breast after lumpectomy to improve cosmesis, the resulting tissue rearrangement increases the difficulty for radiation oncologists to accurately delineate the cavity when planning radiation therapy. Owing to the absence of a standardized protocol, it is important to assess the efficacy of various methods used to mark the tumor cavity for improved delineation.

Methods and Materials

A keyword search and analysis was used to compile relevant articles on PubMed (National Center for Biotechnology Information).

Results

Currently, a common practice for tumor cavity localization is applying titanium surgical clips to the borders of lumpectomy cavity. Tissue movement and seroma formation both impact the positioning of surgical clips within the tumor cavity and lead to significant interobserver variability. Furthermore, the main application of surgical clips is to control the small vessels during surgery, and that can create confusion when the same clips are used for tumor bed localization. All alternative solutions present more precise tumor bed delineation but possess individual concerns with workflow integration, patient comfort, and accuracy. Though liquid-based fiducials were found to be the most effective for delineating tumor cavities, there are still drawbacks for clinical use.

Conclusions

These findings should encourage medical innovators to develop novel techniques for tumor cavity marking to increase delineation accuracy and effectively target at-risk tissue. Future solutions in this space should consider the properties of liquid-based fiducial markers to improve radiation oncologists' ability to precisely delineate the tumor cavity.

Comparison of visibility of iodinated hydrogel and gadolinium-modified hyaluronic acid spacer gels on computed tomography and onboard imaging

Background and purpose

In accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), accurate definition of the tumour bed is crucial to reduce the risk of local recurrence and the volume of healthy tissue irradiated. Recently, hydrogels have been proposed to improve visibility of the lumpectomy cavity for APBI. The aim of this study was to alter two commercially available hyaluronic acid (HA) gels, with gadopentenate dimeglumine (GD), a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agent. We hypothesize that after injection in the surgical cavity, the mixtures will be visible with computed tomography (CT) for improved treatment planning, cone-beam CT (CBCT) for improved patient setup and planar kilovoltage (kV) x-ray for real-time tracking during treatment.

Materials and methods

In this ex vivo study, GD was mixed with the two HA gels, and 1 mL of each mixture was injected into fatty and muscular tissue of a pork phantom. Visibility with CT, CBCT and planar x-ray imaging was assessed. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were measured and compared to commercially available iodinated polyethylene glycol (PEG).

Results

The gel mixtures showed increased visibility over HA gels without GD. When comparing CNR of the gel mixtures to that of iodinated PEG on CT, there was a 4-fold increase in muscle for both mixtures and a 1.6-fold to 3.6-fold increase in fat, depending on the HA gel. Gel mixtures showed better visibility with planar kV imaging over iodinated PEG.

Conclusion

Addition of GD to HA gels increases visibility with CT, CBCT and planar x-ray imaging, indicating potential for improved delineation and positioning in APBI.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Breast Tumor Bed Delineation: Computed Tomography Comparison and Sequence Variation

Purpose

Our purpose was to investigate the interobserver variability in breast tumor bed delineation using magnetic resonance (MR) compared with computed tomography (CT) at baseline and to quantify the change in tumor bed volume between pretreatment and end-of-treatment MR for patients undergoing whole breast radiation therapy.

Methods and Materials

Forty-eight patients with breast cancer planned for whole breast radiation therapy underwent CT and MR (T1, T1 fat-suppression [T1fs], and T2) simulation in the supine treatment position before radiation therapy and MR (T1, T1fs, and T2) at the end of treatment in the same position. Two observers delineated 50 tumor beds on the CT and all MR sequences and assigned cavity visualization scores to the images. The primary endpoint was interobserver variability, measured using the conformity index (CI).

Results

The mean cavity visualization scores at baseline were 3.14 (CT), 3.26 (T1), 3.41 (T1fs), and 3.58 (T2). The mean CIs were 0.65, 0.65, 0.72, and 0.68, respectively. T1fs significantly improved interobserver variability compared with CT, T1, or T2 (P < .001, P < .001, and P = .011, respectively). The CI for T1fs was significantly higher than T1 and T2 at the end of treatment (mean 0.72, 0.64, and 0.66, respectively; P < .001). The mean tumor bed volume on the T1fs sequence decreased from 18 cm³ at baseline to 13 cm³ at the end of treatment (P < .01).

Conclusions

T1fs reduced interobserver variability on both pre- and end-of-treatment scans and measured a reduction in tumor bed volume during whole breast radiation therapy. This rapid sequence could be easily used for adaptive boost or partial breast irradiation, especially on MR linear accelerators.

DE-MR simulation imaging for prone radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery: assessing its application in lumpectomy cavity delineation based on deformable image registration

Background

The application of delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance (DE-MR) simulation imaging in lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation for prone radiotherapy in patients with an invisible seroma or a low seroma clarity score (SCS) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) based on deformable image registration (DIR) was assessed.

Methods

Twenty-six patients who were suitable for radiotherapy in prone positions after BCS were enrolled, and both computed tomography (CT) and DE-MR simulation scans were acquired. The LC delineated based on titanium surgical clips on CT images was denoted as LC_CT. The LC delineated based on the signal of cavity boundaries on fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and multiphase delayed-enhancement T1-weighted imaging (DE-T1WI), which was performed at 2 min, 5 min and 10 min postinjection, were denoted as LC_T2, LC_2T1, LC_5T1 and LC_10T1, respectively. Afterwards, DIR was performed to compare the volumes and locations of the LCs with MIM software. The generalized conformity index (CIgen) of inter (intra) observer (Inter-CIgen and Intra-CIgen) was also used to explore the inter(intra) observer variation for LC delineation on each image modality.

Results

LC_CT–LC_10T1 provided the best conformal index (CI) and degree of inclusion (DI), increasing by 2.08% and 4.48% compared to LC_CT–LC_T2, 11.36% and 2.94% for LC_CT–LC_2T1, and 8.89% and 7.69% for LC_5T1–LC_CT, respectively. The center of mass (COM) of LC_CT–LC_10T1 decreased by 17.86%, 6.12% and 13.21% compared with that of LC_CT–LC_T2, LC_CT–LC_2T1 and LC_CT–LC_5T1, respectively. The agreement of LC delineation was strongest for 10th min DE-TIWI (coefficient of variation, COV = 2.30%, Inter-CIgen = 87.06%, Intra-CIgen = 92.64%).

Conclusion

For patients with a low SCS (SCS ≤ 2) after BCS, it is feasible to contour the LC based on prone DE-MR simulation images. Furthermore, the LC derived from prone DE-T1WI at 10 min was found to be most similar to that derived from prone CT simulation scans using titanium surgical clips regardless of the volume and location of the LC. Inter (intra) variability was minimal for the delineation of the LC based on 10th min DE-TIWI.

Intraoperative radiotherapy boost as part of breast-conservation therapy for breast cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis

Background

There are currently no data from randomized controlled trials on the use of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a tumor bed boost as part of a breast-conservation approach for breast cancer. This study retrospectively reviewed the safety and efficacy of IORT as a boost treatment at a tertiary cancer center.

Methods

From 2015 to 2019, patients underwent breast-conserving surgery with axillary lymph node staging and a single dose of 20 Gy IORT with 50-kV photons, followed by whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and adjuvant systemic therapy (if applicable). Patients were followed for assessment of acute and late toxicities (using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0) at 3–6-month intervals. Outcomes included ipsilateral (IBTR) and contralateral breast progression-free survival (CBE), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

Median follow-up for the 214 patients was 28 (range 2–59) months. Most patients had T1 disease (n = 124) and were clinically node negative. Only few patients had high-grade and/or triple-negative disease. The vast majority of patients underwent sentinel node biopsy, and 32 (15%) required re-resection for initially positive margins. Finally, all tumor bed margins were clear. Nine (4.2%) and 48 (22.4%) patients underwent neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. WBI was predominantly performed as conventionally fractionated WBI (n = 187, 87.4%), and the median time from BCS to WBI was 54.5 days. IORT was delivered with a single dose of 20 Gy. The median WBI dose was 50 Gy (range 29.4–50.4 Gy). No patients experienced grade 4 events; acute grade 3 toxicities were limited to 17 (8%) cases of radiation dermatitis. Postoperative toxicities were mild. After WBI only one case of late grade ≥ 2 events was reported. There were two recurrences in the tumor bed and one contralateral breast event.

Conclusion

This investigation provides additional preliminary data supporting the using of IORT in the boost setting and corroborates the existing literature. These encouraging results should be prospectively validated by the eventual publication of randomized studies such as TARGIT‑B.

Are we missing the post-operative cavity in whole breast radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Whole breast radiotherapy (RT) following breast-conserving surgery is a standard treatment option in early-stage breast cancer patients. The whole breast RT technique targets the entire breast, traditionally identified based on breast palpation and the lumpectomy scar. The aim of this study is to evaluate dosimetry of the tumour bed (cavity) and location of recurrence in women treated with breast radiotherapy without explicit cavity delineation.

MATERIALS/METHODS

50 consecutive women previously treated with whole breast RT were retrospectively contoured to define the post-operative cavity with a 1.0 cm expansion for planning target volume (cPTV). The cavity and cPTV dosimetric coverage [volume receiving 92%(V92%) and 95%(V95%) prescription] were calculated. Cavity and cPTV location were classified as inside, at edge or outside of previous treatment fields and recurrence rates were collected.

RESULTS

Forty-five (90%) women had cavities located inside the previous treatment fields (CAVin) and 5 women (10%) had cavities located outside(4) or at edge(1) of previous fields (CAVout/edge). CAVout/edge were located in extreme aspects of the breast: lateral(3); medial(1); or superior(1). Mean cavity_V92% was 91.6% vs 98.5% for CAVout/edge vs CAVin (p = 0.042). Mean cPTV_V92% was 78.7% vs 97.2% for cPTVout/edge vs cPTVin (p<0.001). At 5-year follow-up, 20% (1/5) of the CAVout/edge had 1 in-breast recurrence near the cavity (at previous field edge). Within the CAVin cohort, 11 patients were lost to follow-up and 6% (2/34) patients had in-breast recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with whole breast RT without cavity delineation, 10% did not have ideal dosimetric coverage of the cavity. Cavity delineation in treatment planning provides optimal tumour bed coverage for patients undergoing whole breast RT, and is of particular importance for the coverage of cavities located in the extreme margins of the breast.

Effective of Pre-operative 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-d-glucose/Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Determination of Boost Volume in Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Breast-conserving Surgery

Objectives:

Determining boost volume (BV) during breast radiotherapy can be challenging at times. Therefore, surgical clips are now being widely used. At times, when surgical clips are inadequate in determining the BV, other additional imaging methods are required. In the present study, we aimed to demonstrate that pre-operative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) can be used to determine the BV after a breast-conversing surgery.

Methods:

We selected thirty patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery with surgical clips and had preoperative Fluorine-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose PET (18 FDG PET/CT). The BV in planning tomography (CT) and primary tumor volume (TV) in pre-operative F-18 FDG PET/CT was contoured by a radiation oncologist. These two volumes were superposed using rigid image fusion. In every patient, two BVs were measured. The mean shift between the two volumes by the calculation of the center of mass and percentage of the PET-CT TV (PET-CT TV) in planning the BV (planning target volume [PTV]-BV) was calculated.

Results:

The median age was 52 years (range 25–72 years). The pre-operative PET-CT TV median was 8.89 cm³ (range 1.00–64.30 cm³). The median PTV-BV was 62.92 cm³ (12.57–123.07 cm³). The median shifts between the center of volumes were 1.76 cm (range 0.90–3.50) in X(coronal), 1.73 cm (range 0.60–3.60) in the Y(axial), and 1.20 cm (0.40–2.80) in the Z(sagittal) directions, respectively. The shifts in these three planes were determined to be statistically significant (p<0.001). The percent volume of PET-CT TV included PTV TV, ranging from 35% to 100% (mean 54%, standard deviation 29.53) and 100% in two out of 31 patients.

Conclusion:

Our study has shown that pre-operative PET-CT cannot be used to determine the BV in patients who replaced surgical clips and had undergone breast-conserving surgery. To define a more accurate BV, surgical clips should be placed in four planes, and more PTV margins should be given in treatment planning.

A Three-Dimensional Bioabsorbable Tissue Marker for Volume Replacement and Radiation Planning: A Multicenter Study of Surgical and Patient-Reported Outcomes for 818 Patients with Breast Cancer

Background

Accurate identification of the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) ensures appropriate radiation to the tumor bed while minimizing normal tissue exposure. The BioZorb^® three-dimensional (3D) bioabsorbable tissue marker provides a reliable target for radiation therapy (RT) planning and follow-up evaluation while serving as a scaffold to maintain breast contour.

Methods

After informed consent, 818 patients (826 breasts) implanted with the BioZorb^® at 14 U.S. sites were enrolled in a national registry. All the patients were prospectively followed with the BioZorb^® implant after BCS. The data collected at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months included all demographics, treatment parameters, and provider/patient-assessed cosmesis.

Results

The median follow-up period was 18.2 months (range, 0.2–53.4 months). The 30-day breast infection rate was 0.5 % of the patients (n = 4), and re-excision was performed for 8.1 % of the patients (n = 66), whereas 2.6 % of the patients (n = 21) underwent mastectomy. Two patients (0.2 %) had local recurrence. The patient-reported cosmetic outcomes at 6, 12, and 24 months were rated as good-to-excellent by 92.4 %, 90.6 %, and 87.3 % of the patients, respectively and similarly by the surgeons. The radiation oncologists reported planning of target volume (PTV) reduction for 46.2 % of the patients receiving radiation boost, with PTV reduction most commonly estimated at 30 %.

Conclusions

This report describes the first large multicenter study of 818 patients implanted with the BioZorb^® tissue marker during BCS. Radiation oncologists found that the device yielded reduced PTVs and that both the patients and the surgeons reported good-to-excellent long-term cosmetic outcomes, with low adverse effects. The BioZorb^® 3D tissue marker is a safe adjunct to BCS and may add benefits for both surgeons and radiation oncologists.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-020-09271-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contribution of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Determining Lumpectomy Cavity in Breast Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Accurate localization of the lumpectomy cavity is important for breast cancer radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery (BCS), but the LC localization based on CT is often difficult to delineate accurately. The study aimed to compare CT-defined LC planning to MRI-defined findings in the supine position for higher soft-tissue resolution of MRI.

METHODS

Fifty-nine breast cancer patients underwent radiotherapy CT planning in supine position followed by MR imaging on the same day. LC was contoured by the radiologist and radiation oncologist together by CT and MRI separately. T2 weighted MR images and tomography findings were combined and the LC volume, mean diameter and the longest axis length were measured after contouring. Subsequently, patients were divided into two groups according to seroma in LC and the above-mentioned parameters were compared.

RESULTS

We did not find any statistically significant difference in the LC volume, mean diameter and length at the longest axis between CT and MRI but based on the presence or absence of seroma, statistically significant differences were found in the LC volumes and the length at the longest axis of LC volumes.

CONCLUSION

We believe that the supine MRI in the same position with CT will be more effective for radiotherapy planning, particularly in patients without a seroma in the surgical cavity.

What is the dosimetric impact of isotropic vs anisotropic safety margins for delineation of the clinical target volume in breast brachytherapy?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report dosimetric differences for breast brachytherapy plans optimized for clinical target volume (CTV) generated using conventional isotropic expansion of tumor bed volume (TBV) and Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) recommendations to expand the TBV anisotropically to achieve a total safety margin of 2 cm (resection margin size + added safety margin).

METHODS

Institutional records of 100 patients who underwent accelerated partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy from May 2015 to March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. Two sets of CT-based plans were made, one with 1-cm isotropic margins around the tumor bed (CTV_ISO) and the other with anisotropic margins (CTV_GEC). Plans were evaluated and compared using the American Brachytherapy Society and GEC-ESTRO guidelines.

RESULTS

The median TBV was 36.97 cc. The median margin widths were as follows: anterior 1.2, posterior 1.0, superior 1.0, inferior 0.9, medial 1.2, and lateral 1.2 cm. The mean tumor bed coverage index was 0.94; 0.93 [p.066], the CTV coverage index 0.86; 0.84 [p 0.001], the dose homogeneity index (DHI) 0.77; 0.75 [p < 0.001] and the conformity index 0.66; 0.64 [p < 0.001] in CTV_ISO and CTV_GEC plans, respectively. In smaller volume implants (TBV< 35 cc), the DHI was 0.76; 0.75 [p 0.008] and the conformity index was 0.66; 0.62 [p < 0.001], whereas in larger volumes >35 cc, the CTV coverage index was 0.86; 0.84 [p 0.003] and the DHI 0.78; 0.76 [p 0.001] in CTV_ISO and CTV_GEC plans, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients who underwent accelerated partial breast irradiation, plans with anisotropic margins had lower conformity, the impact of which was predominantly seen in smaller implants. Rest of the dosimetric constraints were achieved in both the plans as per the American Brachytherapy Society and GEC-ESTRO guidelines.

Comparison of postoperative CT- and preoperative MRI-based breast tumor bed contours in prone position for radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery

Objectives

To compare the target volume of tumor bed defined by postoperative computed tomography (post-CT) in prone position registered with or without preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (pre-MRI).

Methods

A total of 22 patients were included with early-stage breast invasive ductal cancer, who have undergone breast-conservative surgery and received the pre-MRI and post-CT in prone position. The MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T2W-SPAIR, DWI, dyn-eTHRIVE, sdyn-eTHRIVE) were delineated and manually registered to CT, respectively. The clinical target volumes (CTVs) and planning target volumes (PTVs) were contoured on CT and different MRI sequences, respectively. Differences were measured in terms of consistence index (CI), dice coefficient (DC), geographical miss index (GMI), and normal tissue index (NTI).

Results

The differences of delineation volumes among CT and MRIs were significant, both in the CTVs (p = 0.035) and PTVs (p < 0.001). The values of CI and DC for sdyn-eTHRIVE registration to CT were the largest among all MRI sequences, but GMI and NTI were the smallest. No obvious linear correlation (p > 0.05) between the CI derived from the registration of CT and sdyn-eTHRIVE of CTV with the breast volume, the cavity visualization score (CVS) of CT, time interval from surgery to CT simulation, the maximum diameter of the intraoperative mass, and the number of titanium clips, respectively.

Conclusions

The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT. The pre-MRI, especially the sdyn-eTHRIVE, could be used to optimize the post-CT-based target delineation of breast cancer.

Key Points

• Registered pre-MRI to post-CT in order to improve the accuracy of target volume delineation of breast cancer.

• The CTVs and PTVs in MRI sequences were all smaller than those in CT.

• The sdyn-eTHRIVE of pre-MRIs may be a better choice to improve the delineation of CT-based CTV and PTV.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-020-07085-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Interobserver Variability of Target Volumes Delineated in the Supine and Prone Positions Based on Computed Tomography Images for External-Beam Partial Breast Irradiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Comparative Study

Background: Although the supine position remains the dominant position for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI), the advantages of administering EB-PBI in the prone position have been recognized. The interobserver variability between target volumes delineated in the different positions for EB-PBI after breast-conserving surgery needs to be investigated.

Methods: Twenty-seven patients suitable for EB-PBI were enrolled from July 2016 to April 2017. Supine and prone simulation CT images were sequentially acquired for all enrolled patients during free breathing. Five experienced radiotherapists delineated the target volumes for all patients on supine and prone simulation CT images. The selected parameters, including target volumes, the coefficient of variation (COV), the matching degree (MD), and so on, were calculated to analyze the interobserver variability.

Results: Regardless of the patient position, the interobserver variability between tumor bed (TB) and clinical target volume (CTV) measurements in supine and prone positions were statistically significant (F = 31.34, 19.467; 44.000, 41.985; P = 0.000, 0.001; 0.000, 0.001). The interobserver variability of COV_CTV was significantly greater in the supine position than in the prone position (T = 2.64, P = 0.014). Furthermore, the interobserver variabilities of MD_TB and MD_CTV were statistically lower in the supine position than in the prone position (Z = −3.460, −3.195, P = 0.000, 0.001).

Conclusion: When delineating the target volume for EB-PBI, the interobserver variability in the prone position was lower than that in the supine position. Hence, the administration of EB-PBI in the prone position during free breathing is a reasonable option.

Surgical Clips in Breast-conserving Surgery: Do they Represent the Tumour Bed Accurately?

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) is a standard treatment for breast cancer. Currently, surgical clips are used to determine the tumour bed before radiotherapy planning. This study aimed to evaluate the migration of these clips on mammograms.

METHODS

The study was conducted on 121 females who were treated with radiotherapy after BCS at their first radiologic control examination 6 months after the end of treatment. MLO and CC views of all cases were evaluated regarding the clips. The distance between the surgical scar centre and the centre of the area covered by the clips was measured on both MLO and CC projections and recorded separately. This distance was determined as the clip displacement. A displacement ≤10 mm was recorded as no displacement.

RESULTS

The clips were out of the images and were not evaluated in 45 cases (37.2%) on CC and in 9 cases (7.4%) on MLO projections. There were no clip displacements in 37 (30.6%) cases on CC and in 43 (35.5%) cases on MLO views. The amount of displacement ranged from 11 to 56 mm with a mean of 24.38 mm on CC views, while on MLO projections, displacement ranged from 11 to 66 mm with a mean of 24.42 mm.

CONCLUSION

A clip displacement of greater than 10 mm was found in 64.5% of cases on MLO views. Therefore, we believe that the reliability of these clips for accurate delineation of the tumour bed in radiotherapy planning is controversial and other methods must be added.

Comparing Breast Conservation Surgery Seromas Contoured by Radiation Therapists versus those Contoured by a Radiation Oncologist in Radiation Therapy Planning for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the management of early-stage breast cancer using radiation therapy, computed tomography (CT) simulation is used to identify the breast conservation surgery (BCS) seroma as a proxy for the tumour bed. The delineation or contouring of the seroma is generally a task performed by a radiation oncologist (RO). With increasing patient numbers and other demands placed on ROs, the scope of practice for radiation therapists (RTs) is continually expanding, and the need for skills transfer from one profession to another has been investigated in recent years. This study aims to compare the BCS seroma volumes contoured by RTs with those contoured by ROs to add evidence in support of expanding the RTs' role in the treatment planning process in the management of early-stage breast cancer.

METHODS

A study was undertaken using the CT-simulation (CT-sim) data sets of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated in 2013. The CT-sim data sets had BCS seromas contoured by 1 of 5 ROs as part of routine clinical management. This study involved 4 RTs who each used the patient information to identify and contour breast seromas on 50 deidentified CT-sim data sets. Metrics used to compare RT versus RO contours included volume size, overlap between volumes, and geographical distance from the centre of volumes.

RESULTS

There were 50 CT-sim data sets with 1 RO contour and 4 RT contours analysed. The contour volumes of the 4 RTs and the ROs were assessed. Although there were 50 CT-sim data sets presented to each RT, analysis was carried out on 45, 43, 46, and 45 CT-sim data sets. There were no comparisons made where contours were not delineated. The contour volumes of the 4 RTs and the ROs were assessed with an interclass correlation coefficient, with a result of excellent reliability (0.975, 95% [0.963, 0.985]). The DICE similarity coefficient was used to compare the overlap of each RT contour with the RO contour; the results were favourable with mean (95% CI) DSCs 0.685, 0.640, 0.678, and 0.681, respectively. Comparing the RT and RO geographical centre of the seroma volumes, good to excellent reliability between the RTs and ROs was demonstrated (95% CI mean RO vs RT distances (mm): 3.75, 4.99, 7.71, and 3.39). There was no statistically significant difference between the distances (P = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

BCS seromas contoured by RTs compared well with those contoured by an RO. This research has provided further evidence to support RTs in assuming additional contouring responsibilities in radiation therapy planning for patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Intra- and inter-observer variability in breast tumour bed contouring and the controversial role of surgical clips

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the visualization of surgical clips (SCs) on the same set of planning computed tomography (CT) of breast cancer (BC) patients influences agreement on tumour bed (TB) delineation. Planning CT (CT_orig) of 47 BC patients with SCs to visualize the TB was processed in order to blur SCs and create a virtual CT (CT_mod). Four radiation oncologists (ROs, 2 juniors and 2 seniors) contoured TB on both the CT sets. Centre of mass distance (CMD), percentage overlap as Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface distance as average Hausdorff distance (AHD) and TB volume size were analysed. The intra-observer variability when contouring TB with and without SCs was statistically significant (p-values = 0.016, 0.0002 and ≪ 0.001 for CMD, AHD and DSC, respectively). Junior ROs showed worse reproducibility compared to seniors. The median DSC was < 0.7. The inter-observer variability with and without SCs was statistically significant (p < 0.001) for all metrics, with an increase of 48.7% in DSC and decrease of 50.7% and 57.1% in CMD and AHD, respectively, as relative median values, when SCs were visible. Regarding TB volumes, when SCs were visible, the intra-observer analysis revealed that 3/4 ROs delineated larger volumes, especially juniors. The inter-observer analysis showed that, in presence of visible SCs, the difference in TB volume among all the ROs fell from statistically significant to borderline significance (p = 0.052). TB contouring is confirmed to be an observer-dependent task. SCs decreased the intra and inter-observer variability but the overall agreement between ROs remained low.

Catheter-based delineation of lumpectomy cavity for accurate target definition in partial-breast irradiation with multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy

Purpose

In partial-breast irradiation (PBI), accurate lumpectomy cavity (LC) delineation is critical. Seroma-based delineation (SBD) using computed tomography (CT) with clips remains uncertain, causing an expansion of the LC and planning target volume (PTV). In catheter-based delineation (CBD), the implanted catheters were used as reference markers for LC delineation in multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIB).

Material and methods

Between October 2008 and October 2018, 513 patients who underwent MIB-PBI were examined. In CBD, anatomical relations of LC to catheters were recorded. In randomly selected 22 CBD cases, the LC volume and PTV were retrospectively recontoured on SBD, and the relationship between the contribution of CBD and cavity visuality was evaluated. The LC volume and PTV before and after the introduction of CBD were compared.

Results

The mean LC volumes based on SBD and CBD were 19.1 cm³ and 14.1 cm³, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean PTVs based on SBD and CBD were 47.9 cm³ and 35.7 cm³, respectively (p < 0.0001). More reductions in the LC volume (5.1 cm³) (p < 0.05) and PTV (7.7 cm³) (p = 0.13) were observed in the poorly visible LC than in the visible LC. The LC volume and PTV before the introduction of CBD (n = 411) were compared with those after introduction (n = 102). Significant reductions were observed in the LC volume (5.9 cm³) (p < 0.0001) after the introduction of CBD; moreover, PTV tended to be reduced (3.9 cm³) (p = 0.17).

Conclusions

CBD may help to establish the standardized procedure for MIB-PBI and prevent unnecessary radiation exposure to the normal breast tissue.

Improving oncoplastic breast tumor bed localization for radiotherapy planning using image registration algorithms

Knowledge about tumor bed localization and its shape analysis is a crucial factor for preventing irradiation of healthy tissues during supportive radiotherapy and as a result, cancer recurrence. The localization process is especially hard for tumors placed nearby soft tissues, which undergo complex, nonrigid deformations. Among them, breast cancer can be considered as the most representative example. A natural approach to improving tumor bed localization is the use of image registration algorithms. However, this involves two unusual aspects which are not common in typical medical image registration: the real deformation field is discontinuous, and there is no direct correspondence between the cancer and its bed in the source and the target 3D images respectively. The tumor no longer exists during radiotherapy planning. Therefore, a traditional evaluation approach based on known, smooth deformations and target registration error are not directly applicable. In this work, we propose alternative artificial deformations which model the tumor bed creation process. We perform a comprehensive evaluation of the most commonly used deformable registration algorithms: B-Splines free form deformations (B-Splines FFD), different variants of the Demons and TV-L¹ optical flow. The evaluation procedure includes quantitative assessment of the dedicated artificial deformations, target registration error calculation, 3D contour propagation and medical experts visual judgment. The results demonstrate that the currently, practically applied image registration (rigid registration and B-Splines FFD) are not able to correctly reconstruct discontinuous deformation fields. We show that the symmetric Demons provide the most accurate soft tissues alignment in terms of the ability to reconstruct the deformation field, target registration error and relative tumor volume change, while B-Splines FFD and TV-L¹ optical flow are not an appropriate choice for the breast tumor bed localization problem, even though the visual alignment seems to be better than for the Demons algorithm. However, no algorithm could recover the deformation field with sufficient accuracy in terms of vector length and rotation angle differences.

MRI Reduces Variation of Contouring for Boost Clinical Target Volume in Breast Cancer Patients Without Surgical Clips in the Tumour Bed

BACKGROUND

Omitting the placement of clips inside tumour bed during breast cancer surgery poses a challenge for delineation of lumpectomy cavity clinical target volume (CTVLC). We aimed to quantify inter-observer variation and accuracy for CT- and MRI-based segmentation of CTVLC in patients without clips.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT- and MRI-simulator images of 12 breast cancer patients, treated by breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy, were included in this study. Five radiation oncologists recorded the cavity visualization score (CVS) and delineated CTVLC on both modalities. Expert-consensus (EC) contours were delineated by a senior radiation oncologist, respecting opinions of all observers. Inter-observer volumetric variation and generalized conformity index (CIgen) were calculated. Deviations from EC contour were quantified by the accuracy index (AI) and inter-delineation distances (IDD).

RESULTS

Mean CVS was 3.88 +/- 0.99 and 3.05 +/- 1.07 for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.001). Mean volumes of CTVLC were similar: 154 +/- 26 cm3 on CT and 152 +/- 19 cm3 on MRI. Mean CIgen and AI were superior for MRI when compared with CT (CIgen: 0.74 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.67 +/- 0.12, p = 0.007; AI: 0.81 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.76 +/- 0.07; p = 0.004). CIgen and AI increased with increasing CVS. Mean IDD was 3 mm +/- 1.5 mm and 3.6 mm +/- 2.3 mm for MRI and CT, respectively (p = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

When compared with CT, MRI improved visualization of post-lumpectomy changes, reduced interobserver variation and improved the accuracy of CTVLC contouring in patients without clips in the tumour bed. Further studies with bigger sample sizes are needed to confirm our findings.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography for Breast Target Volume Delineation in Prone and Supine Positions

PURPOSE

To determine whether T2-weighted MRI improves seroma cavity (SC) and whole breast (WB) interobserver conformity for radiation therapy purposes, compared with the gold standard of CT, both in the prone and supine positions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eleven observers (2 radiologists and 9 radiation oncologists) delineated SC and WB clinical target volumes (CTVs) on T2-weighted MRI and CT supine and prone scans (4 scans per patient) for 33 patient datasets. Individual observer's volumes were compared using the Dice similarity coefficient, volume overlap index, center of mass shift, and Hausdorff distances. An average cavity visualization score was also determined.

RESULTS

Imaging modality did not affect interobserver variation for WB CTVs. Prone WB CTVs were larger in volume and more conformal than supine CTVs (on both MRI and CT). Seroma cavity volumes were larger on CT than on MRI. Seroma cavity volumes proved to be comparable in interobserver conformity in both modalities (volume overlap index of 0.57 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.54-0.60) for CT supine and 0.52 (95% CI 0.48-0.56) for MRI supine, 0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.59) for CT prone and 0.55 (95% CI 0.51-0.59) for MRI prone); however, after registering modalities together the intermodality variation (Dice similarity coefficient of 0.41 (95% CI 0.36-0.46) for supine and 0.38 (0.34-0.42) for prone) was larger than the interobserver variability for SC, despite the location typically remaining constant.

CONCLUSIONS

Magnetic resonance imaging interobserver variation was comparable to CT for the WB CTV and SC delineation, in both prone and supine positions. Although the cavity visualization score and interobserver concordance was not significantly higher for MRI than for CT, the SCs were smaller on MRI, potentially owing to clearer SC definition, especially on T2-weighted MR images.

Is the use of a preoperative computed tomography beneficial to reduce the interobserver variability of the CTVboost delineation for breast radiation therapy?

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of a preoperative (preop) computed tomography (CT) reduces (1) the clinical target volume boost (CTV_boost) and (2) the interobserver variability (IOV) of the delineated CTV_boost in breast radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In patients treated with breast-conserving therapy, 3 CT scans in treatment position were performed: (1) preop; (2) after surgery, prechemotherapy (postop); and (3) postchemotherapy (postchemo). Six radiation-oncologists delineated the tumor bed and CTV_boost before and after fusion of the preop CT. To assess the IOV, the Jaccard index was used. Linear mixed models were performedfor all analyses.

RESULTS

Eighty-two lumpectomy cavities were evaluated in 22 patients. No difference in CTV_boost using the fusion of the preop CT (50.0 cm³; 95% confidence interval [CI], 35.6-64.4) compared with no fusion (49.0 cm³; 95% CI, 34.6-63.4) (P = .6) was observed. A significant increase in IOV was shown with the fusion of the preop CT; the mean Jaccard index of the CTV_boost delineation of postop and postchemo CT together without the fusion of the preop CT was 0.53 (95% CI, 0.49-0.57) versus 0.50 (95% CI, 0.46-0.53) with fusion (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There is no benefit of using a preop CT to reduce the volume or the interobserver variability of the delineated CTV_boost for breast radiation therapy.

Recommendations from GEC ESTRO Breast Cancer Working Group (II): Target definition and target delineation for accelerated or boost partial breast irradiation using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy after breast conserving open cavity surgery

OBJECTIVE

To prepare guidelines for target definition and delineations after open cavity breast conserving surgery in accelerated partial breast irradiations or boost treatments using multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy based on the consensus of the Breast Working Group of GEC-ESTRO.

METHOD

Following a study on interobserver variations of target volume delineation in multicatheter breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery and a number of discussions in consensus meetings these guidelines were worked out by experts on the field.

PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS

(1) Consistent windowing has to be used for proper cavity visualization. (2) The cavity visualization score has to be at least 3 in order to minimize the interobserver variations of target definition. (3) At delineation of surgical cavity only the homogeneous part of the postoperative seroma has to be included in the contours and protrusions or sharp irregularities have to be excluded. When surgical clips are present, they have to be surrounded by the contour with close contact. (4) CTV is created from the outlined surgical cavity with a nonisotropic geometrical extension. In each direction the safety margin is calculated by taking into account the size of the free resection margin. The total size of safety margin is always 20mm which is the sum of the surgical and added safety margins. CTV is limited to chest wall/pectoral muscles and 5mm below the skin surface.

CONCLUSION

Following these guidelines the target volume definition in breast brachytherapy after open cavity surgery is expected to be accomplished in more consistent way with low interobserver variations.

A Comparison of Lumpectomy Cavity Delineations Between Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Acquired With Patient in Prone Position for Radiation Therapy Planning of Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To compare lumpectomy cavity (LC) and planning target volume (PTV) delineated with the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) and to examine the possibility of replacing CT with MRI for radiation therapy (RT) planning for breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

MRI and CT data were acquired for 15 patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy during RT simulation in prone positions, the same as their RT treatment positions. The LCs were delineated manually on both CT (LC-CT) and MRI acquired with 4 sequences: T1, T2, STIR, and DCE. Various PTVs were created by expanding a 15-mm margin from the corresponding LCs and from the union of the LCs for the 4 MRI sequences (PTV-MRI). Differences were measured in terms of cavity visualization score (CVS) and dice coefficient (DC).

RESULTS

The mean CVSs for T1, T2, STIR, DCE, and CT defined LCs were 3.47, 3.47, 3.87, 3.50. and 2.60, respectively, implying that the LC is mostly visible with a STIR sequence. The mean reductions of LCs from those for CT were 22%, 43%, 36%, and 17% for T1, T2, STIR, and DCE, respectively. In 14 of 15 cases, MRI (union of T1, T2, STIR, and DCE) defined LC included extra regions that would not be visible from CT. The DCs between CT and MRI (union of T1, T2, STIR, and DCE) defined volumes were 0.65 ± 0.20 for LCs and 0.85 ± 0.06 for PTVs. There was no obvious difference between the volumes of PTV-MRI and PTV-CT, and the average PTV-STIR/PTV-CT volume ratio was 0.83 ± 0.23.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MRI improves the visibility of LC in comparison with CT. The volumes of LC and PTV generated based on a MRI sequence are substantially smaller than those based on CT, and the PTV-MRI volumes, defined by the union of T1, T2, STIR, and DCE, were comparable with those of PTV-CT for most of the cases studied.

Interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on 4DCT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation

Background

To explore the interobserver variability in the delineation of the tumour bed using seroma and surgical clips based on the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation (EB-PBI) during free breathing.

Methods

Patients with a seroma clarity score (SCS) 3 ~ 5 and ≥5 surgical clips in the lumpectomy cavity after breast-conserving surgery who were recruited for EB-PBI underwent 4DCT simulation. Based on the ten sets of 4DCT images acquired, the tumour bed formed using the clips, the seroma, and both the clips and seroma (defined as TB_C, TB_S and TB_C+S, respectively) were delineated by five radiation oncologists using specific guidelines. The following parameters were calculated to analyse interobserver variability: volume of the tumour bed (TB_C, TB_S, TB_C+S), coefficient of variation (COV_C, COV_S, COV_C+S), and matching degree (MD_C, MD_S, MD_C+S).

Results

The interobserver variability for TB_C and TB_C+S and for COV_C and COV_C+S were statistically significant (p = 0.021, 0.008, 0.002, 0.015). No significant difference was observed for TB_S and COV_S (p = 0.867, 0.061). Significant differences in interobserver variability were observed for MD_C vs MD_S, MD_C vs MD_C+S, MD_S vs MD_C+S (p = 0.000, 0.032, 0.008), the interobserver variability of MD_S was smaller than that of MD_C and MD_C+S (MD_S > MD_C+S > MD_C).

Conclusions

When the SCS was 3 ~ 5 points and the number of surgical clips was ≥5, interobserver variability was minimal for the delineation of the tumour bed based on seroma.

IOERT as anticipated tumor bed boost during breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer--results of a case series after 5-year follow-up

To evaluate retrospectively rates of local (LCR) and locoregional tumor control (LRCR) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who were treated with preoperative chemotherapy (primary systemic treatment, PST) followed by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and either intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) preceding whole-breast irradiation (WBI) (Group 1) or with WBI followed by an external tumor bed boost (electrons or photons) instead of IOERT (Group 2). From 2002 to 2007, 83 patients with clinical Stage II or III breast cancer were enrolled in Group 1 and 26 in Group 2. All patients received PST followed by BCS and axillary lymph node dissection. IOERT boosts were applied by single doses of 9 Gy (90% reference isodose) versus external boosts of 12 Gy (median dose range, 6-16) in 2 Gy/fraction (ICRU). WBI in both groups was performed up to total doses of 51-57 Gy (1.7-1.8 Gy/fraction). The respective median follow-up times for Groups 1 and 2 amount 59 months (range, 3-115) and 67.5 months (range, 13-120). Corresponding 6-year rates for LCR, LRCR, metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival were 98.5, 97.2, 84.7, 89.2 and 86.4% for Group 1 and 88.1, 88.1, 74, 92 and 92% for Group 2, respectively, without any statistical significances. IOERT as boost modality during BCS in LABC after PST shows a trend to be superior in terms of LCR and LRCR in comparison with conventional boosts.

A comparative study on the volume and localization of the internal gross target volume defined using the seroma and surgical clips based on 4DCT scan for external-beam partial breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery

Background

To explore the volume and localization of the internal gross target volume defined using the seroma and/or surgical clips based on the four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) during free-breathing.

Methods

Fifteen breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were recruited for EB-PBI. On the ten sets CT images, the gross target volume formed by the clips, the seroma, both the clips and seroma delineated by one radiation oncologist and defined as GTVc, GTVs and GTVc + s, respectively. The ten GTVc, GTVs and GTVc + s on the ten sets CT images produced the IGTVc, IGTVs, IGTVc + s, respectively. The IGTV volume and the distance between the center of IGTVc, IGTVs, IGTVc + s were all recorded. Conformity index (CI), degree of inclusion (DI) were calculated for IGTV/IGTV, respectively.

Results

The volume of IGTVc + s were significantly larger than the IGTVc and IGTVs (p < 0.05). There was significant difference between the DIs of IGTVc vs IGTVc + s, the DIs of IGTVs vs IGTVc + s. There was significant difference among the CIs of IGTV/IGTV. The DIs and CIs of IGTV/IGTV were negatively correlated with their centroid distance (r < 0, p < 0.05).

Conclusions

There were volume difference and spatial mismatch between the IGTVs delineated based on the surgical clips and seroma. The IGTV defined as the seroma and surgical clips provided the best overall representation of the ‘true’ moving GTV.

Target volume delineation in breast conserving radiotherapy: are co-registered CT and MR images of added value?

Introduction

In breast conserving radiotherapy differences of target volume delineations between observers do occur. We evaluated whether delineations based on co-registered computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging may result in an improved consistency between observers. We used the delineation conformity index (CI) to compare clinical target volumes of glandular breast tissue (CTV breast) and lumpectomy cavity (LC) on both imaging modalities.

Methods and materials

Four observers delineated CTV breast and LC on co-registered CTMR images in ten breast cancer patients. CIs were determined for CT and CTMR. Furthermore, the Cavity Visualization Score (CVS) of LC was taken into account.

Results

The mean CI for CTV breast (CI_CT;CTV: 0.82 and CI_CT-CTMR;CTV: 0.80) and LC (CI_CT;LC: 0.52 and CI_CT-CTMR;LC: 0.48) did not differ significantly (p = 0.07 and p = 0.33, respectively). Taking CVS into account for the LC, with a CVS ≥ 4 the mean CI was 0.62 for both CI_CT;LC and CI_CT-CTMR;LC.

Conclusion

The mean volume of the delineated glandular breast tissue based on CT was significantly larger compared to the volume based on CTMR. For patients with a CVS ≥ 4, the mean CIs of the LC were higher compared to CVS < 4 for volumes delineated on both CT as well as CTMR images. In our study cohort no significant differences between the CIs of the CTV breast and the LC delineated on CTMR co-registered images were found compared to the CIs on CT images only. Adding MR images does not seem to improve consistency of the delineation of the CTV breast and the LC, even though the volumes were copied from CT images. Since we included only ten patients, caution should be taken with regard to the results of our study.

Intraoperative Period and Breast Cancer: Review

Intraoperative radiation therapy in breast cancer (IORT) delivers a concentrated dose of radiation therapy to a tumor bed during surgery. IORT offers some of the following advantages with typically fewer complications like; maximum effect, sparing healthy tissues and organs, to help the patients finish treatment and get back to their normal activities. The goal of IORT is to improve local tumor control and survival rates for patients with breast cancer. IORT can both be performed with electron beams (ELIOT) and X-rays. Two main randomised trials testing intraoperative partial breast radiotherapy are TARGIT trial and the ELIOT (intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons) trial, but the techniques are fundamentally different. Whereas TARGIT delivers radiation from within the undisturbed tumour bed, for ELIOT, the mammary gland is mobilised, a prepectoral lead shield is inserted, the edges of the tumour bed are apposed, and radiation is delivered from without.

Tumour bed clip localisation for targeted breast radiotherapy: compliance is proportional to trial-related research activity: tumour bed clip localisation in breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer, with the increasing use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), the need for accurate tumour bed localisation is paramount. We determined current practice of clip usage in patients referred to a regional centre for radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery. We also investigated whether participation of surgical units in IMRT trials, where tumour bed clip use is emphasised, was associated with clip insertion.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of consecutive CT planning images (n = 205), of breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy following breast conserving surgery. Presence and number of clips; referring hospital and referring surgeon of the patient was recorded. This was correlated to previous participation of referring hospital to IMRT trials.

RESULTS

Of 196 eligible patients, 126 (64%) had clips sited, of which 15 (12%) had two or fewer clips. Five referring hospitals were high recruiters (≥14 patients), and five hospitals were low/non-recruiters (≤1 patient) to IMRT trials. Of patients from low/non-recruiting centres, 29 of 43 (67%) had clips omitted, compared to 41 of 153 (27%) from high-recruiting centres (p < 0.001). Median number of clips used in centres recruiting high numbers of patients was four, compared to zero in low recruiting centres. Ten of 31 referring surgeons routinely omitted clips.

CONCLUSION

Despite inclusion in national guidelines, clip insertion has not become routine in the UK in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery. However, hospitals involved in breast radiotherapy randomised controlled trials are more compliant with clip usage recommendations. Auditing of clip insertion should be considered as a quality control marker in breast surgery.

Can initial diagnostic PET-CT aid to localize tumor bed in breast cancer radiotherapy: feasibility study using deformable image registration

Background

Localization of the tumor bed of breast cancer is crucial for accurate planning of boost irradiation. Lumpectomy cavity and surgical clips provide localizing information about tumor bed. However, defining the tumor bed is often difficult because of presence of unclear lumpectomy cavity and lack of certain information such as absence of surgical clips. In the present study, we evaluated the feasibility of initial diagnostic PET-CT in localization of the tumor bed using deformable image registration (DIR).

Methods

We selected twenty-five patients who had an initial diagnostic PET-CT performed and underwent breast-conserving surgery with surgical clips in tumor bed. In every individual patient, two target volumes were separately delineated on planning CT; 1) target volume based on surgical clips with a margin of 1 cm (TV_clip) and 2) tumor volume based on 90% of maximum SUV on PET-CT registered by DIR (TV_PET). The percent of TV_PET in TV_clip (V_in) was calculated and distance between center points of two volumes (D_center) was also measured.

Results

Mean D_center between two volumes was 1.4 cm (range, 0.33 – 2.53). Mean V_in was 94.8% (range, 60.9-100) and 100% in 18 out of 25 patients. When compared to the center of TV_clip, the center of TV_PET tended to be located posteriorly (mean 0.3 cm, standard deviation 0.6), laterally (mean 0.3 cm, standard deviation 0.8) and inferiorly (mean 0.4 cm, standard deviation 0.9).

Conclusion

Initial diagnostic PET-CT can be one of the possible references to localize the tumor bed in breast cancer radiotherapy.

IORT with electrons as boost strategy during breast conserving therapy in limited stage breast cancer: long term results of an ISIORT pooled analysis

PURPOSE

Linac-based intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons (IOERT) was implemented to prevent local recurrences after breast conserving therapy (BCT) and was delivered as an intraoperative boost to the tumor bed prior to whole breast radiotherapy (WBI). A collaborative analysis has been performed by European ISIORT member institutions for long term evaluation of this strategy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Until 10/2005, 1109 unselected patients of any risk group have been identified among seven centers using identical methods, sequencing and dosage for intra- and postoperative radiotherapy. A median IOERT dose of 10 Gy was applied (90% reference isodose), preceding WBI with 50-54 Gy (single doses 1.7-2 Gy).

RESULTS

At a median follow up of 72.4 months (0.8-239), only 16 in-breast recurrences were observed, yielding a local tumor control rate of 99.2%. Relapses occurred 12.5-151 months after primary treatment. In multivariate analysis only grade 3 reached significance (p=0.031) to be predictive for local recurrence development. Taking into account patient age, annual in-breast recurrence rates amounted 0.64%, 0.34%, 0.21% and 0.16% in patients <40 years; 40-49 years; 50-59 years and ≥ 60 years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In all risk subgroups, a 10 Gy IOERT boost prior to WBI provided outstanding local control rates, comparing favourably to all trials with similar length of follow up.

Target localisation for tumour bed radiotherapy in early breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

To compare clinical and CT techniques in localisation of the tumour bed in patients undergoing adjuvant breast radiotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients were CT scanned in the treatment position following clinical delineation of the whole breast, surgical scar and boost volume. Computed tomography boost volumes were contoured in three dimensions. A definitive treatment plan was generated to encompass the CT-localised planning target volume (PTV) with ≥90% isodose using electrons. A hypothetical plan was also generated to cover the clinically determined boost field for comparison. The primary end point was the difference in PTV coverage by the 90% isodose between the plans based on clinically and CT localised boost volumes.

RESULTS

The plans for 50 patients were evaluated. The median percentage of PTV encompassed by the 90% isodose using the clinical and CT techniques was 29% (range 5-90%) and 83% (range 25-100%), respectively. PTV coverage by the 90% isodose using the clinical technique was at least 10% less than that using CT technique in 88% of patients (95% confidence interval 77-95%; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Tumour bed boost PTV coverage was insufficient using clinical determination as compared with CT localisation. This study supports CT planning for target volume localisation of the tumour bed boost in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer.

Reducing interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving radiation therapy using a pre-operative CT and delineation guidelines

AIMS

To investigate whether using a pre-operative CT scan (Preop-CT) (1) decreases interobserver variation of boost-CTV delineation in breast conserving therapy (BCT), and (2) influences the size of the delineated volumes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty cT1-2N0-1 breast cancer patients underwent a CT-scan in radiation treatment position, prior to and after lumpectomy. Five observers delineated a boost-CTV, both with and without access to the Preop-CT. For each patient and for each observer pair, the conformity index (CI) and the distance between the centres of mass (COMd) for both boost volumes were calculated. In addition, all delineated volumes including the standard deviation (SD) with respect to the median delineation were calculated.

RESULTS

Using a Preop-CT reduced the mean COMd of the boost-CTV from 1.1cm to 1.0 cm (p<0.001). No effect was seen on the CI, but the boost-CTV volume reduced from 42 cc to 36 cc (p=0.005), implying a reduction of interobserver variation. We saw no significant change in the SD.

CONCLUSION

Use of a Preop-CT in BCT results in a modest but statistically significant reduction in interobserver variation of the boost-CTV delineations and in a significant reduction in the boost-CTV volume.