Second re-irradiation: efficacy, dose and toxicity in patients who received three courses of radiotherapy with overlapping fields

The Dosimetric Analysis of Duodenal and Intestinal Toxicity After a Curative Dose Re-irradiation Using the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Abdominopelvic Lymph Node Lesions

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to examine the influence of dosimetric factors on gastrointestinal toxicity after radical re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence in the abdominopelvic region using a composite plan.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and March 2017, 33 patients underwent radical re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence in the abdominopelvic region with a complete overlap with previous radiation therapy (RT) with the median prescription dose of the second RT of 71.7 Gy10. Re-irradiation planning protocol for target volume and organs at risk (OARs) (duodenum, small and large intestines) was decided as follows: more than equal to 97% of the prescription dose was administered to the D95 (percentage of the minimum dose that covered 95% of the target volume) of planning target volume (PTV); minimal dose to the maximally irradiated doses delivered to 1cc [D1 cc] and 5cc [D5 cc] of OARs was set below 70 Gy3 and 50 Gy3, respectively; and D1 cc and D5 cc in the cumulative plans to OARs were 120 Gy3 and 100 Gy3. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and univariate log-rank and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses were performed to explore predictive factors. Using dose summation of the first and re-irradiation plans, we conducted a dosimetric analysis for grade ≥ 3 toxicities of the duodenum and intestine.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 18 months, the two-year OS rate was 45.5%. The number of RT fields (localized or multiple) was a significant predisposing factor for OS rate with a hazard ratio of 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.73). The two-year OS of the patients with a localized RT field was 63.6% and 9.1% for multiple RT fields (p= 0.00007). Four patients experienced grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity related to re-irradiation (4/33=12.1%). We could not find any predisposing dosimetric value in the comparisons with and without toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose constraints presented in this study are relatively low rates of toxicity, which may be useful when planning re-irradiation. Especially, for the patients who could be treated with localized RT field, radical re-irradiation with a high curative dose is a good option. No dosimetric predisposing factor was found for radical re-irradiation of abdominopelvic lesions in the composite plan.

Third whole-brain radiation therapy for multiple brain metastases. Should it be considered in selected patients?

Whole brain reirradiation for the treatment of multiple brain metastases has shown promising results. However, concerns remain over the possible neurotoxic effects of the cumulative dose as well as the questionable radiosensitivity of recurrent metastases. A second reirradiation of the whole brain is ordinarily performed in our department for palliative purposes in patients presenting with multiple metastatic brain progression. For this study, an investigational third whole brain reirradiation has been administered to highly selected patients to obtain disease control and delay progression. Clinical outcomes and neurological toxicity were also evaluated.

Stereotactic Body Reirradiation in Gynaecological Cancer: Outcomes and Toxicities from a Single Institution Experience

AIMS

To report toxicity profile, outcomes and quality of life (QoL) data in patients with recurrent gynaecological cancer who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) retreatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from patients' folders were retrospectively extracted, focusing on the primary neoplasm, previous systemic therapies and previous radiotherapy. Concerning SBRT, the total dose (five daily fractions) was delivered with a linear accelerator using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. Acute and late toxicities were assessed by the CTCAE 4.03 scale. QoL was evaluated according to the Cancer Linear Analogue Scale [CLAS1 (fatigue), CLAS2 (energy level), CLAS3 (daily activities)].

RESULTS

Between December 2005 and August 2021, 23 patients (median age 71 years, range 48-80) with 27 lesions were treated. Most patients had endometrial (34.8%), ovarian (26.1%) and cervical cancer (26.1%) as the primary tumour. The most common SBRT schedules in five fractions were 30 Gy (33.3%), 35 Gy (29.6%) and 40 Gy (29.6%). The median follow-up was 32 months (range 3-128). There were no patients reporting acute or late toxicities higher than grade 2, except for a bone fracture. One- and 2-year local control was 77.9% and 70.8%, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival was 82.6% and 75.1%, respectively. The overall response rate was 96.0%. Regarding QoL, no statistically significant difference was identified between the baseline and follow-up values: the median CLAS1, CLAS2 and CLAS3 scores for each category were 6 (range 4-10) at baseline and 6 (range 3-10) 1 month after SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary experience suggests that SBRT retreatment for recurrent gynaecological cancer is a highly feasible and safe treatment with limited side-effects and no short-term QoL impairment.

Management of reirradiations: A clinical and technical overview based on a French survey

INTRODUCTION

The reirradiation number increased due to systemic therapies and patient survival. Few guidelines regarding acceptable cumulative doses to organs at risk (OARs) and appropriate dose accumulation tools need, made reirradiation challenging. The survey objective was to present the French current technical and clinical practices in reirradiations.

METHODS

A group of physician and physicists developed a survey gathering major issues of the topic. The questionnaire consisted in 4 parts: data collection, demographic, clinical and technical aspects. It was delivered through the SFRO and the SFPM. Data collection lasted 2 months and were gathered to compute statistical analysis.

RESULTS

48 institutions answered the survey. Difficulties about patient data collection were related to patient safety, administrative and technical limitations. Half of the institutions discussed reirradiation cases during a multidisciplinary meeting. It mainly aimed at discussing the indication and the new treatment total dose (92%). 79% of the respondents used various references but only 6% of them were specific to reirradiations. Patients with pain and clinical deficit were ranked as best inclusion criteria. 54.2% of the institutions considered OARs recovery, especially for spinal cord and brainstem. A commercial software was used for dose accumulation for 52% of respondents. Almost all institutions performed equivalent dose conversion (94%). A quarter of the institutions estimated not to have the appropriate equipment for reirradiation.

CONCLUSION

This survey showed the various approaches and tools used in reirradiation management. It highlighted issues in collecting data, and the guidelines necessity for safe practices, to increase clinicians confidence in retreating patients.

Dose evaluations of organs at risk and predictions of gastrointestinal toxicity after re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer by deformable image registration

Purpose

Re-irradiation of locally recurrent pancreatic cancer may be an optimal choice as a local ablative therapy. However, dose constraints of organs at risk (OARs) predictive of severe toxicity remain unknown. Therefore, we aim to calculate and identify accumulated dose distributions of OARs correlating with severe adverse effects and determine possible dose constraints regarding re-irradiation.

Methods

Patients receiving two courses of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the same irradiated regions (the primary tumors) due to local recurrence were included. All doses of the first and second plans were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD₂). Deformable image registration with the workflow "Dose Accumulation-Deformable" of the MIM^® System (version: 6.6.8) was performed for dose summations. Dose-volume parameters predictive of grade 2 or more toxicities were identified, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine optimal thresholds of dose constraints.

Results

Forty patients were included in the analysis. Only the V ₁₀ of the stomach [hazard ratio (HR): 1.02 (95% CI:1.00-1.04), P = 0.035] and D _mean of the intestine [HR: 1.78 (95% CI: 1.00-3.18), P = 0.049] correlated with grade 2 or more gastrointestinal toxicity. Hence, the equation of probability of such toxicity was P = 1 1 + e - ( - 4.155 + 0.579 D mean of the intestine + 0.021 V 10  of the stomach ) Additionally, the area under the ROC curve and threshold of dose constraints of V ₁₀ of the stomach and D _mean of the intestine were 0.779 and 77.575 cc, 0.769 and 4.22 Gy₃ (α/β = 3), respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the equation was 0.821.

Conclusion

The V ₁₀ of the stomach and D _mean of the intestine may be vital parameters to predict grade 2 or more gastrointestinal toxicity, of which the threshold of dose constraints may be beneficial for the practice of re-irradiation of locally relapsed pancreatic cancer.

Re-Irradiation after Radical Dose Radiotherapy: A Case Report Challenging an Established Dogma

Traditionally, external beam radiation therapy has a dogma pronouncing that re-irradiation of a region previously exposed to radical dose radiotherapy is contraindicated due to unacceptable risk to surrounding tissues. This edict is often zealously maintained to the detriment of certain, carefully selected patients that may benefit from re-irradiation. Liposarcoma is a high-grade malignancy with a poor prognosis and high rates of recurrence. A case is described of multiply recurrent liposarcoma that we treated with re-irradiation of an extended field encompassing the gross recurrent tumor mass and including the previously irradiated region. The patient had a very good cosmetic outcome and remained disease-free after 3 years of follow-up. The case demonstrates the potential to significantly improve patient care if established dogmas are challenged related to the re-irradiation of recurrent high-grade tumors. We propose that with careful patient selection, re-irradiation can be delivered safely to patients with recurrent tumors and contribute to improved clinical outcomes.

Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A State-of-the-Art Review

The recurrence rate of cervical cancer after primary treatment can reach 60%, and a poor prognosis is reported in most cases. Treatment options for the recurrence of cervical cancer mainly depend on the prior treatment regimen and the location of recurrent lesions. Re-irradiation is still considered as a clinical challenge, owing to a high incidence of toxicity, especially in in-field recurrence within a short period of time. Recent advances in radiotherapy have preliminarily revealed encouraging outcomes of re-irradiation. Several centers have concentrasted on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of well-selected cases. Meanwhile, as the image-guiding techniques become more precise, a better dose profile can also be achieved in brachytherapy, including high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) and permanent radioactive seed implantation (PRSI). These treatment modalities have shown promising efficacy with a tolerable toxicity, providing further treatment options for recurrent cervical cancer. However, it is highly unlikely to draw a definite conclusion from all of those studies due to the large heterogeneity among them and the lack of large-scale prospective studies. This study mainly reviews and summarizes the progress of re-irradiation for recurrent cervical cancer in recent years, in order to provide potential treatment regimens for the management of re-irradiation.

Re-irradiation for intra-thoracic tumours and extra-thoracic breast cancer: dose accumulation, evaluation of efficacy and toxicity based on a literature review

The improvement seen in the diagnostic procedures and treatment of thoracic tumours means that patients have an increased chance of longer overall survival. Nevertheless, we can still find those who have had a recurrence or developed a secondary cancer in the previously treated area. These patients require retreatment including re-irradiation. We have reviewed the published data on thoracic re-irradiation, which shows that some specific healthy tissues can tolerate a significant dose of irradiation and these patients benefit from aggressive treatment; however, there is a risk of damage to normal tissue under these circumstances. We analysed the literature data on re-irradiation in the areas of vertebral bodies, spinal cord, breast, lung and oesophagus. We evaluated the doses of primary and secondary radiotherapy, the treatment techniques, as well as the local control and median or overall survival in patients treated with re-radiation. The longest OS is reported in the case of re-irradiation after second breast-conserving therapy where the 5-year OS range is 81 to 100% and is shorter in patients with loco-reginal re-irradiation where the 5-y OS range is 18 to 60%. 2-year OS in patients re-irradiated for lung cancer and oesophagus cancer range from 13 to 74% and 18 to 42%, respectively. Majority grade ≥3 toxicity after second breast-conserving therapy was fibrosis up to 35%. For loco-regional breast cancer recurrences, early toxicity occurred in up to 33% of patients resulting in mostly desquamation, while late toxicity was recorded in up to 23% of patients and were mostly ulcerations. Early grade ≥3 lung toxicity developed in up to 39% of patients and up to 20% of Grade 5 hemoptysis. The most frequently observed early toxicity grade ≥3 in oesophageal cancer was oesophagitis recorded in up to 57% of patients, followed by hematological complications which was recorded in up to 50% of patients. The most common late complications included dysphagia, recorded in up to 16.7% of patients. We have shown that thoracic re-irradiation is feasible and effective in achieving local control in some patients. Re-irradiation should be performed with maximum accuracy and care using the best available treatment methods with a highly conformal, image-guided approach. Due to tremendous technological progress in the field of radiotherapy, we can deliver radiation precisely, shorten the overall treatment time and potentially reduce treatment-related toxicities.

High Dose Thoracic Re-Irradiation and Chemo-Immunotherapy for Centrally Recurrent NSCLC

Simple Summary

Since the early 1980s, there has been a trend towards escalating radiation doses in pulmonary tumor recurrences with the aim of improving survival. In this context, we performed a literature search in order to summarize the evidence of curative thoracic re-irradiation for centrally recurrent lung cancer. Tumor relapse in this specific situation poses a major problem because of the proximity to mediastinal organs. Of the initial 227 studies, 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for this analysis. The median overall survival (mOS) was 18.1 months (range 9.3–25.1), the median progression-free survival (mPFS) was nine months (range 4.5–16), and the median locoregional control (mLRC) was 12.1 months (range 6.5–20). The total re-irradiation dose correlated with both mLRC (p-value = 0.012) and mOS (p-value = 0.007). As large-scale prospective trials in the field are missing, this literature review is primarily based on retrospective data. In today’s age of enhanced long-term survival rates after chemoradiotherapy followed by immune checkpoint inhibition, the current analysis provides valuable insights into radiation treatment options for patients with loco-regional lung cancer recurrence.

Abstract

Introduction: Thoracic re-irradiation for recurrent lung cancer dates back four decades, when the first small series on 29 patients receiving palliative doses was published. With 5-year overall survival rates of 57% in PDL-1 positive patients after primary chemo-radio-immunotherapy, the number of patients who experience loco-regional relapse will increase in the near future. In this context, centrally recurring lung tumors pose a major treatment challenge. Hence, the aim of the current review is to compile the available evidence on curatively intended thoracic re-irradiation for this special clinical situation. Methods: A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. A study was included when the following criteria were met: (1) 66% of the patients had NSCLC, (2) a total dose of 50 Gy in the second course and/or a biologically effective dose of at least 100 Gy in both treatment courses was administered, (3) re-irradiation was administered with modern radiation techniques, (4) 50% or more of the patients had a centrally located relapse, (5) the minimum cohort size was 30 patients. Results: Of the initial 227 studies, 11 were analyzed, 1 of which was prospective. Median overall survival (OS) was 18.1 months (range 9.3–25.1), median progression free survival (PFS) was nine months (range 4.5–16), and median loco-regional control (LRC) was 12.1 months (range 6.5–20). Treatment-related mortality rates ranged from 2% to 14%. The total dose at re-irradiation correlated with both LRC (p-value = 0.012) and OS (p-value = 0.007) with a close relation between these two clinical endpoints (p-value = 0.006). The occurrence of acute toxicity grade 1 to 4 depended on the PTV size at re-irradiation (p-value = 0.033). Conclusion: The evidence regarding curative re-irradiation for centrally recurrent NSCLC is primarily based on scarce retrospective data, which are characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity. The OS in this clinically challenging situation is expected to be around 1.5 years after re-treatment. Patients with a good performance score, younger age, small tumors, and a longer interval to recurrence potentially benefit most from re-irradiation. In this context, prospective trials are warranted to achieve substantial advances in the field.

Organs at risk radiation dose constraints

Dose constraints are essential for performing dosimetry, especially for intensity modulation and for radiotherapy under stereotaxic conditions. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for the use of these doses in classical current practice but also for reirradiation.

Re-Irradiation for Locally Recurrent Lung Cancer: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

The treatment of locally recurrent lung cancer is a major challenge for radiation-oncologists, especially with data on high-dose reirradiation being limited to small retrospective studies. The aim of the present study is to assess overall survival (OS) for patients with locally recurrent lung cancer after high-dose thoracic reirradiation. Thirty-nine patients who were re-irradiated for lung cancer relapse between October 2013 and February 2019 were eligible for the current retrospective analysis. All patients were re-irradiated with curative intent for in-field tumor recurrence. The diagnostic work-up included a mandatory ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT scan and—if possible—histological verification. The ECOG was ≤2, and the interval between initial and second radiation was at least nine months. Thirty patients (77%) had non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), eight (20%) had small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and in one patient (3%) histological confirmation could not be obtained. More than half of the patients (20/39, 51%) received re-treatment with dose differentiated accelerated re-irradiation (DART) at a median interval of 20.5 months (range: 6–145.3 months) after the initial radiation course. A cumulative EQD₂ of 131 Gy (range: 77–211 Gy) in a median PTV of 46 mL (range: 4–541 mL) was delivered. Patients with SCLC had a 3 mL larger median re-irradiation volume (48 mL, range: 9–541) compared to NSCLC patients (45 mL, range: 4–239). The median cumulative EQD2 delivered in SCLC patients was 84 Gy (range: 77–193 Gy), while NSCLC patients received a median cumulative EQD2 of 135 Gy (range: 98–211 Gy). The median OS was 18.4 months (range: 0.6–64 months), with tumor volume being the only predictor (p < 0.000; HR 1.007; 95%-CI: 1.003–1.012). In terms of toxicity, 17.9% acute and 2.6% late side effects were observed, with a toxicity grade >3 occurring in only one patient. Thoracic high dose reirradiation plays a significant role in prolonging survival, especially in patients with small tumor volume at recurrence.

Management of recurrent or progressive spinal metastases: reirradiation techniques and surgical principles

With the growing incidence of new cases and the increasing prevalence of patients living longer with spine metastasis, a methodological approach to the management of patients with recurrent or progressive disease is increasing in relevance and importance in clinical practice. As a result, disease management has evolved in these patients using advanced surgical and radiotherapy technologies. Five key goals in the management of patients with spine metastases include providing pain relief, controlling metastatic disease at the treated site, improving neurologic deficits, maintaining or improving functional status, and minimizing further mechanical instability. The focus of this review is on advanced reirradiation techniques, given that the majority of patients will be treated with upfront conventional radiotherapy and further treatment on progression is often limited by the cumulative tolerance of nearby organs at risk. This review will also discuss novel surgical approaches such as separation surgery, minimally invasive percutaneous instrumentation, and laser interstitial thermal therapy, which is increasingly being coupled with spine reirradiation to maximize outcomes in this patient population. Lastly, given the complexities of managing recurrent spinal disease, this review emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary care from neurosurgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuro-oncology, rehabilitation medicine, and palliative care.

Challenges in Reirradiation of Intrahepatic Tumors

Definitive reirradiation using a stereotactic technique is an effective local treatment option for both recurrent liver metastases and recurrent primary liver cancers. The tolerance of the liver, bile ducts, and surrounding gastrointestinal luminal organs must be respected to ensure safe retreatment. The risks associated with retreatment to these organs must be carefully balanced with the probability of clinical benefit. We present 2 cases for consideration of repeat irradiation along with the opinions of 4 experts, along with conclusions about recommendations.

Practical effectiveness of re-irradiation with or without surgery for locoregional recurrence of rectal cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Re-irradiation might yield local control (LC) or palliation for locoregionally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC), but iatrogenic complications are a possible hindrance. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation to determine optimal treatment of LRRC.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies involving 744 patients with LRRC were included; median OS ranging from 10 to 45 months (median: 24.5 months). Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates for all patients were 76.1%, 49.1%, and 38.3%, respectively. For patients who underwent re-irradiation and surgery (OP group), these pooled rates were 85.9%, 71.8%, and 51.7%, respectively. For patients who underwent re-irradiation but not surgery (non-OP group), pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 63.5%, 34.2%, and 23.8%, respectively. The OS difference between both groups was significant for all 3 years (P < 0.05). Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates for the OP group were 84.4%, 63.8%, and 46.9%, and for the non-OP group were 72.0%, 54.8%, and 44.6%, respectively, without significant differences. Pooled grade ≥3 acute and late complication rates were 11.7% and 25.5% in the OP and non-OP groups, respectively. Patients who underwent surgery had a higher risk of grade ≥3 late complications (odds ratio: 6.39). Pooled symptomatic palliation rate was 75.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation with or without surgery for LRRC showed oncologic and palliative efficacy. Salvage treatment including re-irradiation and surgery showed higher survival, but the late complication was significantly increased with concomitant surgery.

Second Re-irradiation: Clinical Examples of Worthwhile Treatment

INTRODUCTION

 Improved treatment approaches have resulted in longer survival of patients with certain types of incurable cancer, without eliminating the need for symptom palliation and supportive measures. In this context, re-irradiation is an increasingly important option. Little data exists about a second or repeat re-irradiation.

METHODS

From a single institution database, patients who received a second re-irradiation with cumulative equivalent doses (equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for late effects, alpha/beta-value 3 Gy) of more than 90 Gy and survived for more than six months were identified. Illustrative clinical examples were provided.

RESULTS

The examples describe the treatment of sacral bone metastases, recurrent rectal cancer, and pelvic lymph node metastases. The maximum cumulative EQD2 was 142 Gy. Symptomatic responses were obtained without clinically relevant side effects.

CONCLUSION

 These three cases illustrate that a second re-irradiation has the potential to provide worthwhile palliative effects without causing overt late toxicity during the remaining life time. In patients who tolerated previous radiotherapy well, further re-irradiation may contribute to the ever-increasing armamentarium of options that increase the survival of patients with incurable cancer and try to prolong the time period where independent living is possible.

Second re-irradiation: a narrative review of the available clinical data

BACKGROUND

Considerable controversy exists about the safety and efficacy of second re-irradiations (three courses of radiotherapy to overlapping volumes). Therefore, all published clinical studies were reviewed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Contemporary and historical articles were identified. Outcomes such as survival, local control, symptom improvement and side effects were extracted. Contemporary results were grouped by anatomical location of the re-irradiated region in the body.

RESULTS

Most data were derived from central nervous system tumors, pelvic tumors and bone metastases. We could include nine contemporary, retrospective studies with 2-25 patients each. Nearly, all patients were treated with palliative intent. Most of the prescribed re-irradiation regimens were highly individualized and thus difficult to compare. Symptomatic responses were recorded in most patients. In palliatively treated patients with pelvic and bony target volumes, high-grade toxicity was uncommon.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite of issues related to study size, length of follow-up and calculation of lifetime cumulative equivalent dose, the available data provide an initial framework for future studies and discussion of dose constraints. Selected dose-fractionation regimens may result in a satisfactory therapeutic ratio even after two previous courses of radiotherapy, if these were well tolerated.

Repeat reirradiation of the spinal cord: multi-national expert treatment recommendations

BACKGROUND

Improved survival of patients with spinal bone metastases has resulted in an increased number of referrals for retreatment and repeat reirradiation.

METHODS

A consortium of expert radiation oncologists (RO) has been established with the aim of providing treatment recommendations for challenging clinical scenarios for which there are no established guidelines. In this case, a patient developed local progression of a T5 vertebral lesion after two prior courses of palliative radiotherapy (time interval >12 months, assumed cumulative biologically equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions [EQD2] for spinal cord [alpha/beta 2 Gy] 75 Gy). Expert recommendations were tabulated with the aim of providing guidance.

RESULTS

Five of seven RO would offer a third course of radiotherapy, preferably with advanced techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. However, the dose-fractionation concepts were heterogeneous (3-20 fractions) and sometimes adjusted to different options for systemic treatment. All five RO would compromise target volume coverage to reduce the dose to the spinal cord. Definition of the spinal cord planning-organ-at-risk volume was heterogeneous. All five RO limited the EQD2 for spinal cord. Two were willing to accept more than 12.5 Gy and the highest EQD2 was 19 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing body of literature about bone metastases and spinal cord reirradiation has encouraged some expert RO to offer palliative reirradiation with cumulative cord doses above 75 Gy EQD2; however, no consensus was achieved. Strategies for harmonization of clinical practice and development of evidence-based dose constraints are discussed.

Image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer: A single-institution study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of image-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for reirradiation of locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 2008 and 2015, patients receiving reirradiation using HDR-ISBT for local gross recurrence of uterine cervical cancer after definitive or postoperative radiotherapy were analyzed retrospectively. The prescription doses per fraction ranged 2.5-6.0 Gy, whereas the cumulative equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions ranged 48.6-82.5 Gy. The effects of prognostic factors on the local control (LC), progression-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed, and late toxicity data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in the analysis, with a median followup of 18.1 months. A tumor response was obtained in all patients, with radiological and pathological complete remission seen in 12 (66.7%) patients. The 2-year LC, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates for all patients were 51.3%, 20.0%, and 60.8%, respectively. The hemoglobin level and maximum tumor diameter were shown to be statistically significant prognostic factors for LC (p = 0.028 and 0.009, respectively). Late ≥ Grade 2 adverse events were observed in 5 patients (27.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Image-guided HDR-ISBT for the reirradiation of locally recurrent uterine cervical cancer may play an important role for local tumor control in a subgroup of patients. However, the treatment indication must be weighed against the risk of higher-grade late toxicity.

Repeated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using CyberKnife for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and toxicities of repeated stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Fourteen HCC patients with local recurrence (18 lesions) after liver SABR received repeated radiotherapy with SABR using CyberKnife. No patients experienced radiation-induced liver disease after the first SABR course. The median first SABR dose was 41 Gy (range, 34-60 Gy); the median second SABR dose, 40 Gy (range, 25-50 Gy); and the median interval, 12.9 months. Local recurrence was divided into in-field recurrence and out-field recurrence.

RESULTS

Objective responses were observed in 11 tumors (61.1%), including five tumors (27.8%) with complete responses. Intrahepatic out-field failure was the main cause of treatment failure (7 of 14 patients). In-field failure had developed in 1 of 18 tumors (5.6%), resulting in a 2-year in-field failure-free rate of 88.2%. The median time to progression was 14.0 months, with 1- and 2-year progression-free survival rates of 68.6% and 42.9%, respectively. One- and two-year overall survival rates were 76% and 59.1%, respectively. Of the 14 patients, one developed radiation-induced liver disease and three showed progression of the Child-Turcotte-Pugh class after the second SABR course. Other toxicities were generally mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

Repeated SABR in selected HCC patients is feasible with acceptable toxicity.

Cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery for the re-irradiation of brain lesions: a single-centre experience

PURPOSE

The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and clinical benefit of cyberknife stereotactic radiosurgery (CSRS) in patients treated at Florence University for recurrent, pre-irradiated brain lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirteen patients were retreated with cyberknife. Mean age was 47.1 years (range 33-77 years). Karnofsky performance status ranged from 60 to 100 (median 80). Eleven (84.6%) out of 13 patients had metastatic lesions: four (36.4%) had primary lung, three (27.2%) had primary breast cancer and four (36.4%) other types of solid malignancies. Two (15.4%) out of 13 patients had recurrent of glioblastoma.

RESULTS

In terms of compliance with CSRS, the majority of patients did not develop any acute side effects. However, two (15.4%) out of 13 patients developed acute grade 2 toxicity requiring an increase of steroid medication. At the time of the last follow-up, response rates were as follows: complete response in one case (16.6%), partial response in three (50%) and stable disease in two (33.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation with CSRS is a feasible and effective option for pre-irradiated, recurrent brain lesions to obtain clinical benefit without excessive acute toxicity.

HDR brachytherapy for the reirradiation of cervical and vaginal cancer: analysis of efficacy and dosage delivered to organs at risk

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of HDR brachytherapy (BT) for the reirradiation of cervical or vaginal cancer arising within a previously irradiated area with a special focus on dosage delivery to organs at risk.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients with cervical (N = 19) or vaginal (N = 1) cancer were reirradiated with curative intent using BT with or without external beam irradiation and hyperthermia. The median biologically equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2), assuming α/β = 10, for reirradiation was 48.8 Gy (range: 16.0-91.0 Gy), and the median cumulative EQD2 (for primary treatment and reirradiation) was 133.5 Gy (range: 96.8-164.2 Gy). The median follow-up after retreatment was 31 months (range: 6-86 months).

RESULTS

The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 44%-91%). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 42% (95% CI: 19%-65%). The 3-year local control (LC) rate was 45% (95% CI: 22%-69%). For nine patients who received 3D treatment planning, the median cumulative EQD2 to 2 cm(3) of rectum was 94.4 Gy (range: 67.1-118.8 Gy) and to 2 cm(3) of bladder was 99.3 Gy (range: 70.4-122.3 Gy). Grade 3 late toxicity was observed in 3 patients (15%). An interval between primary RT and reirradiation of ≤ 12 months and a tumor diameter >3 cm were significant prognostic factors adversely affecting OS, DFS and LC.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR BT is a valuable method for the reirradiation of cervical cancer. A cumulative EQD2 of approximately 100 Gy was safely delivered to 2 cm(3) of the bladder and the rectum.

Reirradiation and stereotactic radiotherapy for tumors in the lung: dose summation and toxicity

PURPOSE

To assess the accumulated dose and the toxicity after reirradiation for tumors in the lung using non-rigid registration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients with a tumor in the lung were reirradiated with or after stereotactic radiotherapy. The summed dose distribution was calculated using non-rigid registration. All doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). The median follow-up time was 12 months (range 2-52).

RESULTS

The median Dmax of the lung in the summed plans was 363 Gy3 (range 123-590). The median accumulated V20 of the lungs was 15.2%. Seven patients had in the heart and the trachea an accumulated dose ≥70 Gy3, with a median D(max) of the heart of 115 Gy3 and 89 Gy3 for the trachea. Eight patients had in the esophagus an accumulated dose ≥70 Gy3, with a median accumulated dose of 85 Gy3. No grade 3-5 toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Reirradiation of the lung with or after stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible to a median Dmax of 363 Gy3 to the lung, as low toxicity was observed.

Retreatment with radiotherapy for symptomatic bone, brain or visceral metastases

BACKGROUND

The need for reirradiation in the metastatic disease appears when other modalities of treatment lose their efficacy. The aim of reirradiation in the metastatic disease is mainly palliative to control a particular symptom. However, this theoretical benefit must be confronted against the risk of an undesirable toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experience with reirradiation for symptomatic bone, brain or visceral metastases are reviewed. Twenty-two patients were found to have a second palliative radiotherapy on the same location. Locatión of metastases were visceral in 5 (23 %) patients, brain in 4 (18 %) patients, spine in 1 (4.5 %) patient and bone metastasis other than spine in 12 (54.5 %) patients. Median dose delivered in the first treatment was 30 Gy (range 20-30 Gy) and 20 Gy for the second treatment (range 6-32.4 Gy).

RESULTS

A good symptomatic response after first irradiation (complete response or disappearance of >50 % of symptoms) was reached in 21 (95.5 %) of the 22 patients analyzed. After second irradiation, 82 % (18 patients) achieved a good response, 3 (14 %) patients had a moderate response (relief of symptoms <50 %) whereas no response was observed in 1 (4 %) patient. Acute toxicity was limited to grade 1-2 proctitis in 2 and 3 patients after the first and second irradiation, respectively. No cases of late toxicity after the first or second irradiation were recorded.

CONCLUSION

A second treatment with palliative radiotherapy is feasible and well tolerated and offers the possibility of symptomatic relief in a high percentage of patients with symptomatic metastases.

Re-irradiation: outcome, cumulative dose and toxicity in patients retreated with stereotactic radiotherapy in the abdominal or pelvic region

The purpose of the present study was to explore the outcome, cumulative dose in tumor and organs at risk and toxicity after extra-cranial stereotactic re-irradiation. Twenty-seven patients were evaluated who had been re-irradiated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) after conventional radiotherapy (CRT). The dose summation of the SBRT and CRT plans was done by dose point calculations accounting for fraction size by the linear-quadratic model. Efficacy and toxicity was scored by looking at the reduction in tumor size, pain and bleeding. Symptomatic response was observed in 96% of the patients. The median maximum SBRT dose to the tumor was 90 Gy₃ (range: 42-420 Gy₃). The median cumulative dose for the rectum, bowel and bladder resulted in 104 Gy₃, 98 Gy₃ and 113 Gy₃, respectively. No grades 5, 4 and 3 acute and late toxicity was observed. In conclusion: re-irradiation to the same region using extra-cranial stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible and resulted in a 96% symptomatic response with low toxicity.

Reirradiation of paraaortic lymph node metastasis by brachytherapy with hyaluronate injection via paravertebral approach: With DVH comparison to IMRT

PURPOSE/INTRODUCTION: To safely irradiate retroperitoneal targets as paraaortic lymph node by separating abdominal at-risk organs from the target during irradiation, we created a percutaneous paravertebral approach of high-dose-rate brachytherapy with hyaluronate gel injection (HGI). We report a case treated with this technique.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We encountered a patient with symptomatic regrowth of paraaortic lymph node metastasis from prostatic cancer. He had previously received 58.4Gy of radiotherapy to the same region 12 months prior. Brachytherapy needles and a HGI needle were deployed via the paravertebral approach under local anesthesia at our outpatient clinic.

RESULTS

A single dose of 22.5Gy (equivalent to 60.94Gy in 2Gy per fraction schedule calculated at α/β=10) was delivered to the target, with preservation of the surrounding small intestine by HGI with D(2cc) (minimum dose to the most irradiated volume of 2mL) of 5.05Gy. Therapeutic ratio was 3.64 times higher for this brachytherapy plan compared with an intensity-modulated radiation therapy plan. At followup at 1 year after brachytherapy, the symptoms had disappeared, tumor size had reduced with no fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation, and prostate-specific antigen level had decreased.

CONCLUSION

We consider that high-dose-rate brachytherapy with the HGI procedure offers effective treatment even in this type of reirradiation situation.

Brachytherapy reirradiation with hyaluronate gel injection of paraaortic lymphnode metastasis of pancreatic cancer: paravertebral approach--a technical report with a case

Paraaortic lymph nodal (PALN) recurrence is not a rare scenario of abdominal malignancies including pancreas cancer, even after radiotherapy. The role and indication of reirradiation is limited because it is often associated with significant late toxicity in the surrounding normal organs. We developed a new approach and technique of brachytherapy to overcome this difficult situation, with a paravertebral approach and hyaluronate gel injection (HGI). We encountered a patient with pancreatic cancer who developed PALN metastasis as in-field recurrence, 6 months after resection of pancreatic cancer with 50 Gy of preoperative radiotherapy. The applicator brachytherapy needles and gel injection needles were advanced by percutaneous paravertebral approach under local anesthesia, and by injection of a hyaluronate gel to separate the surrounding small intestines and the target. A single fraction of 18 Gy was delivered to the tumor (75.6 Gy equivalent in conventional schedule calculated with LQ model at α/β = 3) and total estimated D2cc (the minimum dose to the most irradiated volume of 2 cc, calculated at α/β = 2) in the small intestines was 61.6 GyE with HGI and 80.6 GyE without. No complications have been observed for six months. Three months later, FDG accumulation had disappeared, the tumor size was reduced, and serum CA-19-9 value decreased from 5150 U/mL to 36.6 U/mL (normal range < 37.5). Conclusively, the brachytherapy with the HGI procedure by paravertebral approach was thought safe and effective in reirradiation of PALN recurrence.