Primary tumor delineation based on (18)FDG PET for locally advanced head and neck cancer treated by chemo-radiotherapy

A proposed framework for the implementation of head and neck cancer treatment at a new cancer center from a radiation oncology perspective

BACKGROUND

Establishing a new head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment center requires multidisciplinary team management and expertise. To our knowledge, there are no clear recommendations or guidelines in the literature for the commencement of HNC radiation therapy (RT) at a new cancer center. We propose a novel framework outlining the necessary components required to set-up a new radiation therapy HNC treatment.

METHODS

We reviewed the infrastructure and methodology in the commencement of HNC radiation therapy in our cancer care center and invited several external, experienced metropolitan head and neck radiation oncologists to develop a novel consensus guideline that may be used by new RT centers to treat HNC. Recommendations were presented to our internal and external staff specialists using a survey questionnaire with ratings utilized to determine consensus using pre-defined thresholds as per the American Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines Methodology Manual.

CONCLUSION

This consensus recommendation aims to improve RT utilization whilst advocating for optimal patient outcomes by presenting a framework for new radiation therapy centers ready to step up and manage the treatment of head and neck cancer patients. We propose these evidence-based consensus guidelines endorsed by external HNC radiation oncologists.

Efficacy and safety of FDG-PET for determining target volume during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer involving the oral level

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy and safety of target volume determination by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx.

METHODS

We prospectively treated 10 consecutive consenting patients with HNSCC using IMRT, with target volumes determined by PET-CT. Gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) at the oral level were determined by two radiation oncologists for CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and PET-CT. Differences in target volume (GTVPET, GTVCT, GTVMRI, CTVPET, CTVCT, and CTVMRI) for each modality and the interobserver variability of the target volume were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient and Hausdorff distance. Clinical outcomes, including acute adverse events (AEs) and local control were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean GTV was smallest for GTVPET, followed by GTVCT and GTVMRI. There was a significant difference between GTVPET and GTVMRI, but not between the other two groups. The interobserver variability of target volume with PET-CT was significantly less than that with CT or MRI for GTV and tended to be less for CTV, but there was no significant difference in CTV between the modalities. Grade ≤ 3 acute dermatitis, mucositis, and dysphagia occurred in 55%, 88%, and 22% of patients, respectively, but no grade 4 AEs were observed. There was no local recurrence at the oral level after a median follow-up period of 37 months (range, 15-55 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that the target volume determined by PET-CT could safely reduce GTV size and interobserver variability in patients with locally advanced HNSCC extending into the oral cavity or oropharynx undergoing IMRT. Trial registration UMIN, UMIN000033007. Registered 16 jun 2018, https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000037631.

Reirradiation of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: a pragmatic approach, part II: radiation technique and fractionations

INTRODUCTION

Reirradiation (reRT) of local recurrent/second primary tumors of the head and neck represents a potential curative treatment for patients not candidate to a salvage surgery. Aim of the present study is to summarize literature data on modern radiation techniques and fractionations used in this setting of patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A narrative review of the literature was conducted on three topics: (1) target volume delineation (2) reRT dose and techniques and (3) ongoing studies. Patients treated with postoperative reRT and palliative intent were not considered for the current analysis.

RESULTS

Recommendations on the target volume contouring have been reported. 3D-Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy, Stereotactic body Radiotherapy Intraoperative Radiotherapy, Brachytherapy and Charged Particles have been analyzed in terms of indication and fractionation in the field of reRT. Ongoing studies on the topic have been reported for IMRT and Charged Particles. Moreover, according to literature data a stepwise approach has been proposed aiming to provide a useful tool to select patients candidate to a curative reRT in daily clinical practice. Two clinical cases were also provided for its application.

CONCLUSION

Different radiation techniques and fractionations can be used for a second course of radiotherapy in patients with recurrent/second primary tumor of head and neck region. Tumor characteristics as well as radiobiological considerations should be take into account to define the best reRT approach.

Evaluation of 11 C-Choline PET/CT for T Staging and Tumor Volume Delineation in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients in Comparison to 18 F-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

Accurate determination of the primary tumor extension of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by 18 F-FDG PET/CT is limited by the high physiological 18 F-FDG uptake in the surrounding area, especially in the brain tissue. We aimed to assess whether 11 C-choline PET/CT could improve the accuracy of T staging and tumor volume delineation for NPC patients.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NPC were enrolled. The primary tumor extension of each patient was evaluated by 11 C-choline PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI. The PET/CT-based tumor volume ( VPET ) was measured by 3 threshold methods, including the threshold of SUV 2.5 (Th 2.5 ), 40% of maximal SUV (Th 40% ), and the relative background-dependent threshold (Th bgd ). Tumor volume and Dice similarity coefficient were compared among VPET with different segmentation methods and VMR .

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with treatment-naive NPC and 6 patients with suspicious recurrent disease were enrolled. The NPC lesions were avid for both 11 C-choline and 18 F-FDG. Visual analysis showed that 11 C-choline PET/CT had better contrast and higher discernability than 18 F-FDG PET/CT for intracranial, skull base, and orbital involvement. 11 C-choline PET/CT also exhibited advantage over MRI for differentiation between local recurrence and radiation-induced alterations. For the tumor delineated, the VMR was larger than VPET in general, except for 18 F-FDG PET/CT with Th 2.5 threshold. For all 3 threshold methods applied, 11 C-choline PET/CT produced more consistent and comparable tumor volume to MRI than 18 F-FDG PET/CT. 11 C-choline PET/CT with Th bgd threshold showed the closest tumor volume and highest similarity to MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

11 C-choline PET/CT provides a higher accuracy than 18 F-FDG PET/CT in mapping tumor extension in locally advanced NPC and may be a promising complement to MRI in delineating the primary tumor.

Exploring the impact of metabolic imaging in head and neck cancer treatment

Background

Target volume delineation is performed with anatomical imaging for head and neck cancer. Molecular imaging allows the recognition of specific tumor regions. Its inclusion in the pathway could lead to changes in delineation and resultant treatment plans.

Methods

PRISMA methodology was adhered to when selecting the articles for analysis and only full articles were quality assessed.

Results

Seventeen articles were included. Gross tumor volume (GTV) primary, GTV nodal, and other target volumes were evaluated. Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) produced smaller primary GTVs, although not with diffusion‐weighted imaging‐magnetic resonance imaging (DWI‐MRI) or PET/MRI. The impact of these image modalities on GTV nodal did not display any consistency. Additionally, there was considerable heterogeneity in metrics comparing delineations. Four studies included appraised the dosimetric impact of the changes in target volume delineation.

Conclusion

Quantifying the impact of molecular imaging is difficult, due to heterogeneity in reporting metrics in molecular imaging modalities and a paucity of detail regarding delineation method and guideline adherence.

Comparison of Volumetric Quantitative PET Parameters Before and After a CT-Based Elastic Deformation on Dual-Time 18FDG-PET/CT Images: A Feasibility Study in a Perspective of Radiotherapy Planning in Head and Neck Cancer

Background

The use of 18FDG-PET/CT for delineating a gross tumor volume (GTV, also called MTV metabolic tumor volume) in radiotherapy (RT) planning of head neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) is not included in current recommendations, although its interest for the radiotherapist is of evidence. Because pre-RT PET scans are rarely done simultaneously with dosimetry CT, the validation of a robust image registration tool and of a reproducible MTV delineation method is still required.

Objective

Our objective was to study a CT-based elastic registration method on dual-time pre-RT 18FDG-PET/CT images to assess the feasibility of PET-based RT planning in patients with HNSCC.

Methods

Dual-time 18FDG-PET/CT [whole-body examination (wbPET) + 1 dedicated step (headPET)] were selected to simulate a 2-times scenario of pre-RT PET images deformation on dosimetry CT. ER-headPET and RR-headPET images were, respectively, reconstructed after CT-to-CT rigid (RR) and elastic (ER) registrations of the headPET on the wbPET. The MTVs delineation was performed using two methods (40%SUVmax, PET-Edge). The percentage variations of several PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak, MTV, TLG) were calculated between wbPET, ER-headPET, and RR-headPET. Correlation between MTV values was calculated (Deming linear regression). MTVs intersections were assessed by two indices (OF, DICE) and compared together (Wilcoxon test). Additional per-volume analysis was evaluated (Mann-Whitney test). Inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities were evaluated (ICC = intra-class coefficient).

Results

36 patients (30M/6F; median age = 65 y) were retrospectively included. The changes in SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak values between ER-headPET and RR-headPET images were <5%. The variations in MTV values between ER-headPET and wbPET images were −6 and −3% with 40%SUVmax and PET Edge, respectively. Their correlations were excellent whatever the delineation method (R² > 0.99). The ER-headPET MTVs had significant higher mean OF and DICE with the wbPET MTVs, for both delineation methods (p ≤ 0.002); and also when lesions had a volume > 5cc (excellent OF = 0.80 with 40%SUVmax). The inter- and intra-observer reproducibilities for MTV delineation were excellent (ICC ≥ 0.8, close to 1 with PET-Edge).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated no significant changes in MTV after an elastic deformation of pre-RT 18FDG-PET/CT images acquired in dual-time mode. This opens possibilities for HNSCC radiotherapy planning improvement by transferring GTV-PET on dosimetry CT.

Management and work-up procedures of patients with head and neck malignancies treated by radiation

Radiotherapy alone or in association with systemic treatment plays a major role in the treatment of head and neck tumours, either as a primary treatment or as a postoperative modality. The management of these tumours is multidisciplinary, requiring particular care at every treatment step. We present the update of the recommendations of the French Society of Radiation Oncology on the radiotherapy of head and neck tumours from the imaging work-up needed for optimal selection of treatment volume, to optimization of the dose distribution and delivery.

Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy

This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.

Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy

This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.

Positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: What impact?

PET-computed tomography (CT) plays a growing role to guide target volume delineation for head and neck cancer in radiation oncology. Pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET-CT adds information to morphological imaging. First, as a whole-body imaging modality, it reveals regional or distant metastases that induce major therapeutic changes in more than 10% of the cases. Moreover, it allows better pathological lymph node selection which improves overall regional control and overall survival. Second, locally, it allows us to define the metabolic tumoral volume, which is a reliable prognostic feature for survival outcome. [18F]FDG PET-CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) is on average significantly smaller than GTV based on CT. Nevertheless, the overlap is incomplete and more evaluation of composite GTV based on PET and GTV based on CT are needed. However, in clinical practice, the study showed that using GTV PET alone for treatment planning was similar to using GTVCT for local control and dose distribution was better as a dose to organs at risk significantly decreased. In addition to FDG, pretherapeutic PET could give access to different biological tumoral volumes - thanks to different tracers - guiding heterogeneous dose delivery (dose painting concept) to resistant subvolumes. During radiotherapy treatment, follow-up [18F]FDG PET-CT revealed an earlier and more important diminution of GTV than other imaging modality. It may be a valuable support for adaptative radiotherapy as a new treatment plan with a significant impact on dose distribution became possible. Finally, additional studies are required to prospectively validate long-term outcomes and lower toxicity resulting from the use of PET-CT in treatment planning.

[Late toxicity following primary conservative treatment : Dysphagia and xerostomia]

Dysphagia and xerostomia are still among the most important acute and late side effects of radiotherapy. Technical developments over the past two decades have led to improved diagnostics and recognition as well as understanding of the causes of these side effects. Based on these findings and advances in both treatment planning and irradiation techniques, the incidence and severity of treatment-associated radiogenic late sequelae could be clearly reduced by the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), which could contribute to marked long-term improvements in the quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Highly conformal techniques, such as proton therapy have the potential to further reduce treatment-associated side effects in head and neck oncology and are currently being prospectively tested within clinical trial protocols at several centers.

Imaging for Target Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy

The definition of tumor involved volumes in patients with head and neck cancer poses great challenges with the increasing use of highly conformal radiotherapy techniques eg, volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy. The risk of underdosing the tumor might increase unless great care is taken in the process. The information gained from imaging is increasing with both PET and MRI becoming readily available for the definition of targets. The information gained from these techniques is indeed multidimensional as one often acquire data on eg, metabolism, diffusion, and hypoxia together with anatomical and structural information. Nevertheless, much work remains to fully exploit the available information on a patient-specific level. Multimodality target definition in radiotherapy is a chain of processes that must be individually scrutinized, optimized and quality assured. Any uncertainties or errors in image acquisition, reconstruction, interpretation, and delineation are systematic errors and hence will potentially have a detrimental effect on the entire radiotherapy treatment and hence; the chance of cure or the risk of unnecessary side effects. Common guidelines and procedures create a common minimum standard and ground for evaluation and development. In Denmark, the treatment of head and neck cancer is organized within the multidisciplinary Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA). The radiotherapy quality assurance group of DAHANCA organized a workshop in January 2020 with participants from oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine from all centers in Denmark, treating patients with head and neck cancer. The participants agreed on a national guideline on imaging for target delineation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy, which has been approved by the DAHANCA group. The guidelines are available in the Supplementary. The use of multimodality imaging is being recommended for the planning of all radical treatments with a macroscopic tumor. 2-[¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT should be available, preferable in the treatment position. The recommended MRI sequences are T1, T2 with and without fat suppression, and T1 with contrast enhancement, preferable in the treatment position. The interpretation of clinical information, including thorough physical examination as well as imaging, should be done in a multidisciplinary setting with an oncologist, radiologist, and nuclear medicine specialist.

Usefulness of Hybrid PET/MRI in Clinical Evaluation of Head and Neck Cancer Patients

(1) Background: The novel hybrid of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance (PET/MR) examination has been introduced to clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate PET/MR usefulness in preoperative staging of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients (pts); (2) Methods: Thirty eight pts underwent both computed tomography (CT) and PET/MR examination, of whom 21 pts underwent surgical treatment as first-line therapy and were further included in the present study. Postsurgical tissue material was subjected to routine histopathological (HP) examination with additional evaluation of p16, human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and Ki67 status. Agreement of clinical and pathological T staging, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) of CT and PET/MR in metastatic lymph nodes detection were defined. The verification of dependences between standardized uptake value (SUV value), tumor geometrical parameters, number of metastatic lymph nodes in PET/MR and CT, biochemical parameters, Ki67 index, p16, HPV and EBV status was made with statistical analysis of obtained results; (3) Results: PET/MR is characterized by better agreement in T staging, higher specificity, sensitivity, PPV and NPV of lymph nodes evaluation than CT imaging. Significant correlations were observed between SUVmax and maximal tumor diameter from PET/MR, between SUVmean and CT tumor volume, PET/MR tumor volume, maximal tumor diameter assessed in PET/MR. Other correlations were weak and insignificant; (4) Conclusions: Hybrid PET/MR imaging is useful in preoperative staging of HNC. Further studies are needed.

Current Standards for Organ Preservation in Locoregionally Advanced Non-nasopharyngeal Head and Neck Cancer and Evolving Strategies for Favorable-Risk and Platinum-Ineligible Populations

OPINION STATEMENT

Standard-of-care treatment for the majority of patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is either upfront surgery followed by adjuvant treatment as indicated by intraoperative or pathologic findings or concurrent chemoradiation reserving surgical salvage for non-responsive disease. An attempt at upfront complete resection should be pursued if feasible in patients with oral cavity or paranasal sinus primary tumors. Given multimodality treatment paradigms, patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN should be managed in a multidisciplinary setting. Modern radiation therapy, whether postoperative or definitive in intent, is based on target delineation guided by high-quality imaging, using an intensity-modulated radiation technique to spare organs at risk. In select groups of low-risk patients, most notably those with HPV-associated oropharyngeal SCC (OPSCC), several treatment deintensification approaches are currently under investigation. Major experimental strategies within this non-surgical organ preservation domain include reductions in the intensity of the chemotherapy or radiation therapy components of the chemoradiation program, use of induction chemotherapy, or imaging-based selection of patients eligible for deintensified radiation-based treatment. Of note, recent efforts to substitute cetuximab for cisplatin in low-risk HPV-associated OPSCC have demonstrated the inferiority of cetuximab to cisplatin in cisplatin-eligible patients, re-confirming cisplatin as the standard systemic therapy of choice in HNSCC. In patients who are not candidates for any type of cisplatin administration, carboplatin-based therapy or cetuximab remain options, and other non-cisplatin therapies are under investigation. Altered fractionation may be considered in patients who are not candidates for any type of systemic therapy. The role of immunotherapy in the management of locoregional SCCHN remains investigational.

18F-FDG-PET/CT Imaging in Advanced Glottic Cancer: A Tool for Clinical Decision in Comparison with Conventional Imaging

This study assessed the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET-CT (PET/CT) to detect the cartilage and paraglottic infiltration in advanced glottic cancer comparing the results with those of conventional imaging (CI) (contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance). In addition, we assessed the prognostic value of quantitative parameters, measured on baseline PET/CT, in terms of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). We retrospectively analyzed 27 patients with glottic squamous cell carcinoma stage III and IVA, treated in our institute between 2010 and 2016, comparing PET/CT, performed for staging and radiotherapy planning, and CI findings. Cohen's K was used to compare concordance between PET/CT and CI. Imaging findings were correlated with endoscopic evaluation and histological reports (gold standard (GS)). All lesions shown by CI were also detected by PET/CT imaging, and in 5 cases, a better definition of local infiltration was achieved with PET/CT than CI (5 CT). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PET/CT and CT were 95%, 86%, and 93% and 70%, 86%, and 74% for, respectively. MRI showed sensitivity and specificity of 100%. One false-negative (FN) cases and 1 false-positive (FP) case were observed with PET/CT with no difference compared to MRI (10 cases). Six FN cases and 1 FP case were observed with CT. Cohen's K was 0.60 (PET vs. CI) and 0.80 (PET vs. GS). Patients were followed-up for at least 24 months to calculate EFS and OS. 13 local recurrence and 7 deaths were recorded. Among quantitative PET parameters, baseline MTV was the most powerful predictor of outcome. Our data suggest a reliable sensitivity and accuracy of PET/CT in the evaluation of local extension, proving a useful method for initial local staging in addition to the well-established role in lymph-node and distant sites assessment. Furthermore, pretreatment MTV provides better prognostic information than other PET/CT parameters.

PET/MRI-guided GTV delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness and accuracy of 18-fluorine-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) hybrid in gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation during radiotherapy planning in patients with carcinoma of the tongue.

Methods

Ten patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the tongue underwent computed tomography (CT) and PET/MRI examination. The GTV for primary tumor and lymph nodes (nGTV) were defined on CT (GTV-CT) and compared to GTVs obtained from PET (GTV-PET) and MRI (GTV-MRI) images. Two methods of GTV determination were used: visual interpretation of CT, PET (GTV-PET_vis) and MRI images and quantitative automatic method (Syngovia, Siemens) based on a chosen threshold value (20%, 30%, 40%, 50%) of standardized uptake values (SUV_max) from PET examination (GTV-PET_20%, GTV-PET_30%, etc.). Statistical analysis of differences in GTV values obtained from CT, PET and MRI studies was performed. GTV-CT was used as a reference.

Results

In all, 80% of GTV-MRI and 40% of GTV-PET_vis were larger than GTV-CT. Respectively, 20% of GTV-MRI and 60% of GTV-PET_vis were smaller than GTV-CT. Taking into account all threshold measurements, 70% of volumes were smaller than GTV-CT. GTV-PET_30% were the most closely related volumes to GTV-CT from all threshold methods in 50% of patients. GTV-PET_vis generated the most similar volumes in relation to GTV-CT from all PET measurements. Statistical analysis confirmed those results. Compared to nGTV-CT, 70% of nGTV-MRI and 20% of nGTV-PET_vis were larger. The remaining nGTV-MRI and nGTV-PET_vis measurements were smaller than nGTV-CT. Measurements of all thresholds nGTVs were smaller than nGTV-CTV in 52.5% of cases. nGTV-PET_20% were the most closely related volumes to nGTV-CT in 40% of the cases. Statistical analysis showed that nGTV-PET_20% (p = 0.0468), nGTV-PET_vis (p = 0.0166), and nGTV-PET_50% (p = 0.0166) diverge significantly from nGTV-CT results. nGTV-MRI (p = 0.1141), nGTV-PET_30% (p = 0.2845), and nGTV-PET_40% (p = 0.5076) were significantly related with nGTV-CT.

Conclusion

Combination of PET/MRI provides more information during target tumor mass delineation in radiotherapy planning of patients with SCC of the tongue than other standard imaging methods. The most frequently matching threshold value was 30% of SUV_max for primary tumor delineation and 30–40% of SUV_max for nGTV determination.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-019-01480-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiation Therapy (ART): Conceptual Considerations for the Informed Clinician

For nearly 2 decades, adaptive radiation therapy (ART) has been proposed as a method to account for changes in head and neck tumor and normal tissue to enhance therapeutic ratios. While technical advances in imaging, planning and delivery have allowed greater capacity for ART delivery, and a series of dosimetric explorations have consistently shown capacity for improvement, there remains a paucity of clinical trials demonstrating the utility of ART. Furthermore, while ad hoc implementation of head and neck ART is reported, systematic full-scale head and neck ART remains an as yet unreached reality. To some degree, this lack of scalability may be related to not only the complexity of ART, but also variability in the nomenclature and descriptions of what is encompassed by ART. Consequently, we present an overview of the history, current status, and recommendations for the future of ART, with an eye toward improving the clarity and description of head and neck ART for interested clinicians, noting practical considerations for implementation of an ART program or clinical trial. Process level considerations for ART are noted, reminding the reader that, paraphrasing the writer Elbert Hubbard, "Art is not a thing, it is a way."

18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and delineation of radiotherapy volume for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The aim is to investigate the use of ¹⁸F-FDG (fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose) PET/CT in head and neck cancer (HNC) staging and its effect on the therapeutic strategy and radiotherapy (RT) planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred patients with HNC were included. Primary tumor sites: 18% oral cavity, 20% oropharynx, 12% hypopharynx, 11% nasopharynx, 37% larynx, 2% paranasal sinuses. Patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee of Cancer 7th edition. Stage: 5% stage I, 7% stage II, 14% stage III, 61% stage IVA, 7% stage IVB and 6% stage IVC. A contrast-enhanced CT and a ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT acquired under RT position were performed. Both exams were compared to analyze patients' staging reclassification. Changes in therapeutic strategy were analyzed.

RESULTS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT detected 6 distant metastases and treatment intention changed to palliative. Eight synchronous tumors were detected; one received palliative treatment. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT reclassified cTNM staging in 27patients. Tumor extension changed in 28 (14% up-staged; 14% down-staged), implying a change in GTV (Gross Tumor Volume) delineation. Nodal detection was reclassified in 47 patients: 8 patients down-staged (N2C to N2A/N2B/N1) and 2 were false positive. Nineteen patients were false negatives and 5 staged as N+(N1/N2A/N2B) turned out into N2C. These staging modifications imply adapting the nodal volume to be irradiated.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT reclassification was higher than 10% in almost all categories studied (cTNM, tumor extension and nodal disease) and detects more metastases and synchronous tumors than conventional studies, which has an impact on the therapeutic patient management and RT planning.

Current State of Image Guidance in Radiation Oncology: Implications for PTV Margin Expansion and Adaptive Therapy

Image guidance technology has evolved and seen widespread application in the past several decades. Advancements in the diagnostic imaging field have found new applications in radiation oncology and promoted the development of therapeutic devices with advanced imaging capabilities. A recent example is the development of linear accelerators that offer magnetic resonance imaging for real-time imaging and online adaptive planning. Volumetric imaging, in particular, offers more precise localization of soft tissue targets and critical organs which reduces setup uncertainty and permit the use of smaller setup margins. We present a review of the status of current imaging modalities available for radiation oncology and its impact on target margins and use for adaptive therapy.

What is the prognostic impact of FDG PET in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with concomitant chemo-radiotherapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Evidence is conflicting on the prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of our study was to determine the impact of semiquantitative and qualitative metabolic parameters on the outcome in patients managed with standard treatment for locally advanced disease.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed of studies providing estimates of relative risk (RR) for the association between semiquantitative metabolic parameters and efficacy outcome measures.

RESULTS

The analysis included 25 studies, for a total of 2,223 subjects. The most frequent primary tumour site was the oropharynx (1,150/2,223 patients, 51.7%). According to the available data, the majority of patients had stage III/IV disease (1,709/1,799, 94.9%; no information available in four studies) and were treated with standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (1,562/2,009 patients, 77.7%; only one study without available information). A total of 11, 8 and 4 independent studies provided RR estimates for the association between baseline FDG PET metrics and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional control (LRC), respectively. High pretreatment metabolic tumour volume (MTV) was significantly associated with a worse OS (summary RR 1.86, 95% CI 1.08-3.21), PFS (summary RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.14-2.89) and LRC (summary RR 3.49, 95% CI 1.65-7.35). Given the large heterogeneity (I2 > 50%) affecting the summary measures, no cumulative threshold for an unfavourable prognosis could be defined. No statistically significant association was found between SUVmax and any of the outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

FDG PET has prognostic relevance in the context of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Pretreatment MTV is the only metabolic variable with a significant impact on patient outcome. Because of the heterogeneity and the lack of standardized methodology, no definitive conclusions on optimal cut-off values can be drawn.

Verification of HE-based CTV in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer using pan-cytokeratin

•

Currently clinical CTV margins lack evidence and need (histopathological) validation.

•

Tumor outline on HE and pan-cytokeratin staining are comparable for laryngeal cancer.

•

HE-based delineations can be used for histopathology based CTV-margin definition.

Background

For accurate target definition, we determined margins for the clinical target volume (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer in computed tomography (CT, 4.3 mm), magnetic resonance imaging (MR, 6.1 mm) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET, 5.2 mm). Previously, we used Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained whole-mount sections of total laryngectomy specimens as gold standard to define CTV margins. In the present study, we verified the HE-based tumor delineation with staining for pan-cytokeratin, specific for squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Twenty-seven patients with a T3/T4 laryngeal hypopharyngeal tumor were included. From each patient, a total laryngectomy specimen was obtained. Four subsequent 3-mm thick slices containing tumor were selected of which 4-µm thick whole-mount sections were obtained and stained with HE and for pan-cytokeratin CK-AE1/3. Tumors were microscopically delineated on both sections by an experienced head-and-neck pathologist. Tumor delineations were compared using the conformity index (CI) and the distance between both contours.

Results

The CI between HE-based and CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations was 0.87. The maximum and 95th percentile (p95) extent of the HE-based tumor delineations from the CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations were 1.7 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively. The maximum and p95 extent of the CK-AE1/3-based tumor delineations from the HE-based tumor delineations was 1.9 mm and 0.8 mm, respectively.

Conclusions

Histopathological assessment of tumor outline on standard HE-stained sections is comparable to microscopic tumor extent based on squamous cell specific pan-cytokeratin staining. Therefore, CTV margins based on HE based tumor contour will be adequate.

Molecular Imaging-Guided Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Head-and-Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Does it Fulfill the Promises?

With the routine use of intensity modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma allowing highly conformed dose distribution, there is an increasing need for refining both the selection and the delineation of gross tumor volumes (GTV). In this framework, molecular imaging with positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging offers the opportunity to improve diagnostic accuracy and to integrate tumor biology mainly related to the assessment of tumor cell density, tumor hypoxia, and tumor proliferation into the treatment planning equation. Such integration, however, requires a deep comprehension of the technical and methodological issues related to image acquisition, reconstruction, and segmentation. Until now, molecular imaging has had a limited value for the selection of nodal GTV, but there are increasing evidences that both FDG positron emission tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging has a potential value for the delineation of the primary tumor GTV, effecting on dose distribution. With the apprehension of the heterogeneity in tumor biology through molecular imaging, growing evidences have been collected over the years to support the concept of dose escalation/dose redistribution using a planned heterogeneous dose prescription, the so-called "dose painting" approach. Validation trials are ongoing, and in the coming years, one may expect to position the dose painting approach in the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The Utility of PET/CT in the Planning of External Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are the definitive treatment options for patients with localized prostate cancer. A rising level of prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy indicates prostate cancer recurrence, and these patients may still be cured with salvage radiotherapy. To maximize chance for cure, the irradiated volumes should completely encompass the extent of disease. Therefore, accurate estimation of the location of disease is critical for radiotherapy planning in both the definitive and the salvage settings. Current first-line imaging for prostate cancer has limited sensitivity for detection of disease both at initial staging and at biochemical recurrence. Integration of PET into routine evaluation of prostate cancer patients may improve both staging accuracy and radiotherapy planning. 18F-FDG PET/CT is now routinely used in radiation planning for several cancer types. However, 18F-FDG PET/CT has low sensitivity for prostate cancer. Additional PET probes evaluated in prostate cancer include 18F-sodium fluoride, 11C-acetate, 11C- or 18F-choline, 18F-fluciclovine, and 68Ga- or 18F-labeled ligands that bind prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA). PSMA ligands appear to be the most sensitive and specific but have not yet received Food and Drug Administration New Drug Application approval for use in the United States. Retrospective and prospective investigations suggest a potential major impact of PET/CT on prostate radiation treatment planning. Prospective trials randomizing patients to routine radiotherapy planning versus PET/CT-aided planning may show meaningful clinical outcomes. Prospective clinical trials evaluating the addition of 18F-fluciclovine PET/CT for planning of salvage radiotherapy with clinical endpoints are under way. Prospective trials evaluating the clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT on prostate radiation planning are indicated.

Molecular Imaging Using PET/CT for Radiation Therapy Planning for Adult Cancers: Current Status and Expanding Applications

Accurate tumor delineation is a priority in radiation therapy (RT). Metabolic imaging has a key and evolving role in target volume selection and delineation. This is especially so for non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell cancer of the head and neck, and lymphoma, for which positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is complimentary to structural imaging modalities, not only in delineating primary tumors, but also often in revealing previously undiagnosed regional nodal disease. At some sites, PET/CT has been confirmed to enable target size reduction compared with structural imaging alone, with enhanced normal tissue sparing and potentially allowing for dose escalation. These contributions often dramatically affect RT strategies. However, some limitations exist to the use of fluorodeoxyglucose-PET in RT planning, including its relatively poor spatial resolution and partial voluming effects for small tumors. A role is developing for contributions from metabolic imaging to RT planning at other tumor sites and exciting new applications for the use of non-fluorodeoxyglucose metabolic markers for RT planning.

PET/MR Imaging in Head and Neck Cancer: Current Applications and Future Directions

Clinical PET/MR imaging is being implemented at institutions worldwide as part of the standard-of-care imaging for select oncology patients. This article focuses on oncologic applications of PET/MR imaging in cancers of the head and neck. Although current published literature is relatively sparse, the potential benefits of a hybrid modality of PET/MR imaging are discussed along with several possible areas of research. With the increasing number of PET/MR imaging scanners in clinical use and ongoing research, the role of PET/MR imaging in the management of head and neck cancer is likely to become more evident in the near future.

Head and Neck Tumor Control Probability: Radiation Dose-Volume Effects in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Locally Recurrent Previously-Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer: Report of the AAPM Working Group

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a viable reirradiation strategy for locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Doses in the literature have varied, which challenges clinical application of SBRT as well as clinical trial design.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A working group was formed through the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to study tumor control probabilities for SBRT in head and neck cancer. We herein present a systematic review of the available literature addressing the dose/volume data for tumor control probability with SBRT in patients with locally recurrent previously-irradiated head and neck cancer. Dose-response models are generated that present tumor control probability as a function of dose.

RESULTS

Data from more than 300 cases in 8 publications suggest that there is a dose-response relationship, with superior local control and possibly improved overall survival for doses of 35 to 45 Gy (in 5 fractions) compared with <30 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Stereotactic body radiation therapy doses equivalent to 5-fraction doses of 40 to 50 Gy are suggested for retreatment.

Long-term outcome of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-guided dose painting for head and neck cancer: Matched case-control study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report the long-term outcome of ¹⁸ F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (¹⁸ F-FDG-PET)-guided dose painting for head and neck cancer in comparison to conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in a matched case-control study.

METHODS

Seventy-two patients with nonmetastatic head and neck cancer treated with dose painting were compared with 72 control patients matched on tumor site and T classification. Either ¹⁸ F-FDG-PET-guided dose painting by contour (DPBC) or voxel intensity-based dose painting by number (DPBN) was performed; control patients underwent standard IMRT. A total median dose to the dose-painted target was 70.2-85.9 Gy/30-32 fractions versus 69.1 Gy/32 fractions with conventional IMRT. In 31 patients, dose painting was adapted to per-treatment changes in the tumor and organs-at-risk (OAR).

RESULTS

Median follow-up in living dose-painting and control patients was 87.7 months (range 56.1-119.3) and 64.8 months (range 46.3-83.4), respectively. Five-year local control rates in the dose-painting patients were 82.3% against 73.6% in the control (P = .36); in patients treated to normalized isoeffective doses >91 Gy (NID2Gy) local control reached 85.7% at 5 years against 73.6% in the control group (P =.39). There was no difference in regional (P = .82) and distant control (P = .78). Five-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 36.3% versus 38.1% (P = .50) and 56.5% versus 51.7% (P = .72), respectively. A half of the dose-painting patients developed acute grade ≥3 dysphagia (P = .004). Late grade 4 mucosal ulcers at the site of dose escalation in 9 of 72 patients was the most common severe toxicity with dose painting versus 3 of 72 patients with conventional IMRT (P = .11). Patients in the dose-painting group had increased rates of acute and late dysphagia (P = .004 and P = .005).

CONCLUSION

Dose-painting strategies can be used to increase dose to specific tumor subvolumes. Five-year local, regional, and distant control rates are comparable with patients treated with conventional IMRT. Volume and intensity of dose escalation should be further tailored, given the possible increase in severe acute and chronic toxicity. Adapting treatment and decreasing dose to the swallowing structures might contribute to lower toxicity rates when applied in smaller tumor volumes. Whether adaptive DPBN can significantly improve outcomes is currently being investigated in a novel clinical trial.

The clinical outcome correlations between radiation dose and pretreatment metabolic tumor volume for radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: A retrospective analysis

This study was to investigate the clinical outcomes between radiation dose and pretreatment metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.Thirty-four patients received pretreatment F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) were recruited for this study. The CT-based volume (gross tumor volume of the primary [GTVp]) and 4 types of MTVs were measured on the basis of either a maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 2.5 (MTV2.5), 3.0 (MTV3.0), or a fixed threshold of 40% (MTV40%), 50% (MTV50%). F-FDG PET-CT images before treatment, and data including response to treatment, local recurrence, death due to the cancer, disease-free survival (DFS) and primary relapse-free survival (PRFS), were collected for analysis.The Wilcoxon rank test showed that all values determined by the different delineation techniques were significantly different from the GTVp (P < .05). Tumor volume and the homogeneity of target dose of MTV2.5, MTV3.0, MTV40%, and MTV50% were significantly different between the 2 groups of patients through treatment outcomes (P < .05).The survival curves for DFS and PRFS demonstrated that the homogeneity of the target dose in MTVs was a good indicator. The homogeneity of target dose in the tumor is a potential indicator of DSF and PRFS in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent radiotherapy.

Correlation between fluorodeoxyglucose hotspots on pretreatment positron emission tomography/CT and preferential sites of local relapse after chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The potential benefits of ¹⁸ F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/CT (FDG-PET/CT) imaging for radiotherapy (RT) treatment planning of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are increasingly being recognized. It has been suggested that intratumoral subvolumes with high FDG avidity ("hotspots") are potential targets for selected dose escalation. The purposes of this study were to demonstrate that pre-RT FDG-PET/CT can identify intratumoral sites at increased risk of local relapse after RT and to determine an optimal threshold to delineate smaller RT target volumes that would facilitate RT dose escalation without impaired tolerance.

METHODS

Seventy-two consecutive patients with locally advanced HNSCC treated by RT ± chemotherapy were included in this study. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT at initial staging (PET_A ) and during systematic follow-up (PET_R ). FDG-PET/CT was coregistered on the initial CT scan with a rigid method. Various subvolumes (A_X ; × = 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, and 90% standardized uptake value maximum [SUVmax] thresholds) within the primary tumor and in the subsequent local relapse (R_X ; × = 40% and 70% SUVmax thresholds) were compared together (Dice, Jaccard, overlap fraction, common volume/baseline volume, and common volume/recurrent volume).

RESULTS

Nineteen patients (26%) had local relapses. Using a 40% SUVmax threshold, the initial metabolic tumor volume was significantly higher in patients with local relapses than in controlled patients (10.4 ± 8.6 vs 5.1 ± 4.9 cc; p = .002) as well as total lesion glycolysis (117.9 ± 88.6 vs 60.6 ± 80.4; p = .013). For both methods, the overlap index among A₃₀ , A₄₀ , and A₅₀ subvolumes on PET_A and the whole metabolic volume of recurrence R₄₀ and R₇₀ on PET_R showed a moderate agreement (0.52 to 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Our study does not find high overlap index values between the initial tumor and recurrence subvolumes, probably because of a suboptimal coregistration. Our results also confirm that metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis are independently correlated with recurrence-free survival in patients with HNSCC. Further larger prospective studies with FDG-PET/CT performed in the same RT position and with a validated elastic registration method are needed. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1155-1165, 2017.

Modality-specific target definition for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on FDG-PET, CT and MRI

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to improve target definition by deriving modality-specific margins for clinical target volumes (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five patients with T3/T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET scans before laryngectomy. HE-sections were obtained from the surgical specimen and tumor was delineated (tumor_HE). The GTVs on CT and MRI were delineated in consensus. PET-based GTVs were automatically segmented. The three-dimensionally reconstructed specimen was registered to the various images. Modality-specific CTV margins were derived and added to the GTVs to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The resulting CTVs were compared with each other, to tumor_HE, and to CTV_CT10 constructed on CT with the clinical margin of 10mm.

RESULTS

CTV margins of 4.3mm (CT), 6.1mm (MRI) and 5.2mm (PET) were needed to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The median volumes of the resulting modality-specific CTVs were 44ml (CT), 48ml (MRI) and 39ml (PET), while the CTV_10mm was 80ml.

CONCLUSION

For laryngohypopharyngeal tumors, 45-52% target volume reduction compared with CTV_10mm is achievable when modality-specific CTV margins are used. PET-based CTVs were significantly smaller compared to CT- and MRI-based CTVs.

Evaluation of PET/MRI for Tumor Volume Delineation for Head and Neck Cancer

Introduction

Computed tomography (CT), combined positron emitted tomography and CT (PET/CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly used in head and neck radiation planning. Hybrid PET/MRI has garnered attention for potential added value in cancer staging and treatment planning. Herein, we compare PET/MRI vs. planning CT for head and neck cancer gross tumor volume (GTV) delineation.

Material and methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation to 60–70 Gy using IMRT. We performed pretreatment contrast-enhanced planning CT and gadolinium-enhanced PET/MRI. Primary and nodal volumes were delineated on planning CT (GTV-CT) prospectively before treatment and PET/MRI (GTV-PET/MRI) retrospectively after treatment. GTV-PET/MRI was compared to GTV-CT using separate rigid registrations for each tumor volume. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) metric evaluating spatial overlap and modified Hausdorff distance (mHD) evaluating mean orthogonal distance difference were calculated. Minimum dose to 95% of GTVs (D95) was compared.

Results

Eleven patients were evaluable (10 oropharynx, 1 larynx). Nine patients had evaluable primary tumor GTVs and seven patients had evaluable nodal GTVs. Mean primary GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 13.2 and 14.3 cc, with mean intersection 8.7 cc, DSC 0.63, and mHD 1.6 mm. D95 was 65.3 Gy for primary GTV-CT vs. 65.2 Gy for primary GTV-PET/MRI. Mean nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI size were 19.0 and 23.0 cc, with mean intersection 14.4 cc, DSC 0.69, and mHD 2.3 mm. D95 was 62.3 Gy for both nodal GTV-CT and GTV-PET/MRI.

Conclusion

In this series of patients with head and neck (primarily oropharynx) cancer, PET/MRI and CT-GTVs had similar volumes (though there were individual cases with larger differences) with overall small discrepancies in spatial overlap, small mean orthogonal distance differences, and similar radiation doses.

Head and neck target delineation using a novel PET automatic segmentation algorithm

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and impact of using a novel advanced PET auto-segmentation method in Head and Neck (H&N) radiotherapy treatment (RT) planning.

METHODS

ATLAAS, Automatic decision Tree-based Learning Algorithm for Advanced Segmentation, previously developed and validated on pre-clinical data, was applied to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scans of 20 H&N patients undergoing Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy. Primary Gross Tumour Volumes (GTVs) manually delineated on CT/MRI scans (GTVp_CT/MRI), together with ATLAAS-generated contours (GTVp_ATLAAS) were used to derive the RT planning GTV (GTVp_final). ATLAAS outlines were compared to CT/MRI and final GTVs qualitatively and quantitatively using a conformity metric.

RESULTS

The ATLAAS contours were found to be reliable and useful. The volume of GTVp_ATLAAS was smaller than GTVp_CT/MRI in 70% of the cases, with an average conformity index of 0.70. The information provided by ATLAAS was used to grow the GTVp_CT/MRI in 10 cases (up to 10.6mL) and to shrink the GTVp_CT/MRI in 7 cases (up to 12.3mL). ATLAAS provided complementary information to CT/MRI and GTVp_ATLAAS contributed to up to 33% of the final GTV volume across the patient cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

ATLAAS can deliver operator independent PET segmentation to augment clinical outlining using CT and MRI and could have utility in future clinical studies.

18F-FLT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting Response to Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Preliminary Results

The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of ¹⁸F-Fluorothymidine (¹⁸F-FLT) and ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in predicting treatment response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Patients with NPC of Stage II-IVB were prospectively enrolled, receiving 2 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Each patient underwent pretreatment and post-NACT FLT PET/CT and FDG PET/CT. Standard uptake values (SUV) and tumor volume were measured. Tumor response to NACT was evaluated before radiotherapy by MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), and tumor regression at the end of radiotherapy was evaluated at 55 Gy, according to RECIST 1.1 Criteria. Finally, 20 patients were consecutively enrolled. At the end of radiotherapy, 7 patients reached complete regression while others were partial regression. After 2 cycles of NACT both FLT and FDG parameters declined remarkably. Parameters of FDG PET were more strongly correlated to tumor regression than those of FLT PET.70% SUVmax was the best threshold to define contouring margin around the target. Some residual lesions after NACT showed by MRI were negative in PET/CT. Preliminary results showed both ¹⁸F-FDG and ¹⁸F-FLT PET have the potential to monitor and predict tumor regression.

How to minimize morbidity in radiotherapy of pharyngolaryngeal tumors?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiotherapy is one of the most effective treatment modalities for head and neck cancer. However, because of the intricacy between tumors and normal tissues, it can induce morbidity, such as mucositis, dermatitis, xerostomia, dysphagia, hearing loss, vision impairment, skin fibrosis, and osteoradionecrosis of the jaw, and it can dramatically impact on patient quality of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

Throughout the last decade, significant improvements have been made in head and neck cancer radiotherapy, especially with the introduction on a routine basis of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

In this context, this review manuscript will focus on how the implementation of intensity-modulated radiotherapy influences treatment morbidity. Specifically, the issues of target volume and organ-at-risk delineation, sparing of organs at risk, tailored treatment intensity, adaptive treatment, and the use of proton therapy will be discussed.

Recurrent oropharyngeal cancer after organ preserving treatment: pattern of failure and survival

The objectives is to thoroughly analyze the pattern of failure and oncologic outcome in recurrent oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) after (chemo)radiotherapy and correlate the site of failure to the planned radiation dose. Between January 2010 and April 2014, 57 patients with recurrent OPC after (chemo)radiotherapy were analyzed. Endpoints were pattern of failure and overall survival (OS). Local (LF) and regional failure (RF) were classified as in-field [>50% within gross tumor volume (GTV)], marginal [<50% within GTV but >50% within clinical target volume (CTV)], or out-of-field (>50% outside CTV) recurrences. In the whole group, 70 recurrences were reported. Of the 31 LF, 29 (93.5%) were in-field and 2 (6.5%) were marginal. No out-field LF was reported. Of the 21 RF, 13 RF (62%) were in-field, 6 (28.5%) marginal, and 2 (9.5%) out-of-field recurrences. Forty-three percent of RF was developed in an electively treated neck level, and 2 of them were contralateral. OS at 2 years in recurrent HPV positive, compared to HPV-negative OPC, were 66 and 18%, respectively (p = 0.011). OS was also significantly better in patients that were salvage treatment which was possible (70 vs. 6%, p < 0.001). Median survival after distant failure was 3.6 months. The great majority of LFs were located within the GTV and 43% of RFs developed in an electively treated neck level. The currently used margins and dose recipe and the indication for bilateral nodal irradiation need to be reevaluated. OS was significantly better in recurrent HPV-positive OPC and in patients, where salvage treatment was possible.

Role of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck oncology: the point of view of the radiation oncologist

Squamous cell carcinoma is the most common malignant tumour of the head and neck. The initial TNM staging, the evaluation of the tumour response during treatment, and the long-term surveillance are crucial moments in the approach to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Thus, at each of these moments, the choice of the best diagnostic tool providing the more precise and larger information is crucial. Positron emission tomography with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose integrated with CT (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) rapidly gained clinical acceptance, and it has become an important imaging tool in routine clinical oncology. However, controversial data are currently available, for example, on the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT imaging during radiotherapy planning, the prognostic value or its real clinical impact on treatment decisions. In this article, the role of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in HNSCC during pre-treatment staging, radiotherapy planning, treatment response assessment, prognosis and follow-up is reviewed focusing on current evidence and controversial issues. A proposal on how to integrate ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in daily clinical practice is also described.

A randomised controlled trial of Caphosol mouthwash in management of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

This phase III, non-blinded, parallel-group, randomised controlled study evaluated the efficacy of Caphosol mouthwash in the management of radiation-induced oral mucositis (OM) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radical (chemo)radiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomised at 1:1 to Caphosol plus standard oral care (intervention) or standard oral care alone (control), stratified by radiotherapy technique and use of concomitant chemotherapy. Patients in the intervention arm used Caphosol for 7weeks: 6weeks during and 1-week post-radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe OM (CTCAE ⩾grade 3) during and up to week 8 post-radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints include pharyngeal mucositis, dysphagia, pain and quality of life.

RESULTS

The intervention (n=108) and control (n=107) arms were well balanced in terms of patient demographics and treatment characteristics. Following exclusion of patients with missing data, 210 patients were available for analysis. The incidence of severe OM did not differ between the intervention and control arms (64.1% versus 65.4%, p=0.839). Similarly, no significant benefit was observed for other secondary endpoints. Overall, compliance with the recommended frequency of Caphosol was low.

CONCLUSION

Caphosol did not reduce the incidence or duration of severe OM during and after radiotherapy in HNC.

The management of head and neck tumors with high technology radiation therapy

Squamous cell carcinoma is responsible for 90% of the head and neck cancers affecting over 600,000 people worldwide. Radiation therapy, surgery and chemotherapy are the most important treatment modalities in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent innovations in head and neck radiation therapy, which intends to appreciate the cutting-edge intensity-modulated radiation therapy strategies to mitigate long-term toxicities and evaluate promising technologies in the field as adaptive treatment, dose painting and proton therapy.