1
|
Tamihardja J, Cirsi S, Kessler P, Razinskas G, Exner F, Richter A, Polat B, Flentje M. Cone beam CT-based dose accumulation and analysis of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in primary radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:205. [PMID: 34702305 PMCID: PMC8549146 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evaluation of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dose accumulation and target coverage analysis. Methods Twenty-three patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) between December 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Included patients were required to have an identifiable DIL on bi-parametric planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After import into the RayStation treatment planning system and application of a step-wise density override, the fractional doses were computed on each CBCT and were consecutively mapped onto the planning CT via a deformation vector field derived from deformable image registration. Fractional doses were accumulated for all CBCTs and interpolated for missing CBCTs, resulting in the delivered dose for PTVDIL, PTVBoost, PTV, and the organs at risk. The location of the index lesions was recorded according to the sector map of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Version 2.1. Target coverage of the index lesions was evaluated and stratified for location. Results In total, 338 CBCTs were available for analysis. Dose accumulation target coverage of PTVDIL, PTVBoost, and PTV was excellent and no cases of underdosage in DMean, D95%, D02%, and D98% could be detected. Delivered rectum DMean did not significantly differ from the planned dose. Bladder mean DMean was higher than planned with 19.4 ± 7.4 Gy versus 18.8 ± 7.5 Gy, p < 0.001. The penile bulb showed a decreased delivered mean DMean with 29.1 ± 14.0 Gy versus 29.8 ± 14.4 Gy, p < 0.001. Dorsal DILs, defined as DILs in the posterior medial peripheral zone of the prostate, showed a significantly lower delivered dose with a mean DMean difference of 2.2 Gy (95% CI 1.3–3.1 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to ventral lesions. Conclusions CBCT-based dose accumulation showed an adequate delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion and organs at risk within planning limits. Cautious evaluation of the target coverage for index lesions adjacent to the rectum is warranted to avoid underdosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Sinan Cirsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Kessler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Florian Exner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anne Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Darwis NDM, Oike T, Kubo N, Gondhowiardjo SA, Ohno T. Characteristics of PSA Bounce after Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12082180. [PMID: 32764448 PMCID: PMC7465291 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The rate and characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) bounce post-radiotherapy remain unclear. To address this issue, we performed a meta-analysis. Reports of PSA bounce post-radiotherapy with a cutoff of 0.2 ng/mL were searched by using Medline and Web of Science. The primary endpoint was the occurrence rate, and the secondary endpoints were bounce characteristics such as amplitude, time to occurrence, nadir value, and time to nadir. Radiotherapy modality, age, risk classification, androgen deprivation therapy, and the follow-up period were extracted as clinical variables. Meta-analysis and univariate meta-regression were performed with random-effect modeling. Among 290 search-positive studies, 50 reports including 26,258 patients were identified. The rate of bounce was 31%; amplitude was 1.3 ng/mL; time to occurrence was 18 months; nadir value was 0.5 ng/mL; time to nadir was 33 months. Univariate meta-regression analysis showed that radiotherapy modality (29.7%), age (20.2%), and risk classification (12.2%) were the major causes of heterogeneity in the rate of bounce. This is the first meta-analysis of PSA bounce post-radiotherapy. The results are useful for post-radiotherapy surveillance of prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narisa Dewi Maulany Darwis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia—Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia;
| | - Takahiro Oike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
- Correspondence:
| | - Nobuteru Kubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
| | - Soehartati A Gondhowiardjo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia—Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National General Hospital, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10430, Indonesia;
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22, Showa-machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan; (N.D.M.D.); (N.K.); (T.O.)
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22, Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee J, Carver E, Feldman A, Pantelic MV, Elshaikh M, Wen N. Volumetric and Voxel-Wise Analysis of Dominant Intraprostatic Lesions on Multiparametric MRI. Front Oncol 2019; 9:616. [PMID: 31334128 PMCID: PMC6624674 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Multiparametric MR imaging (mpMRI) has shown promising results in the diagnosis and localization of prostate cancer. Furthermore, mpMRI may play an important role in identifying the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for radiotherapy boost. We sought to investigate the level of correlation between dominant tumor foci contoured on various mpMRI sequences. Methods: mpMRI data from 90 patients with MR-guided biopsy-proven prostate cancer were obtained from the SPIE-AAPM-NCI Prostate MR Classification Challenge. Each case consisted of T2-weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and Ktrans images computed from dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences. All image sets were rigidly co-registered, and the dominant tumor foci were identified and contoured for each MRI sequence. Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Dice and Jaccard coefficients were calculated between the contours for each pair of MRI sequences (i.e., T2 vs. ADC, T2 vs. Ktrans, and ADC vs. Ktrans). The voxel wise spearman correlation was also obtained between these image pairs. Results: The DILs were located in the anterior fibromuscular stroma, central zone, peripheral zone, and transition zone in 35.2, 5.6, 32.4, and 25.4% of patients, respectively. Gleason grade groups 1-5 represented 29.6, 40.8, 15.5, and 14.1% of the study population, respectively (with group grades 4 and 5 analyzed together). The mean contour volumes for the T2W images, and the ADC and Ktrans maps were 2.14 ± 2.1, 2.22 ± 2.2, and 1.84 ± 1.5 mL, respectively. Ktrans values were indistinguishable between cancerous regions and the rest of prostatic regions for 19 patients. The Dice coefficient and Jaccard index were 0.74 ± 0.13, 0.60 ± 0.15 for T2W-ADC and 0.61 ± 0.16, 0.46 ± 0.16 for T2W-Ktrans. The voxel-based Spearman correlations were 0.20 ± 0.20 for T2W-ADC and 0.13 ± 0.25 for T2W-Ktrans. Conclusions: The DIL contoured on T2W images had a high level of agreement with those contoured on ADC maps, but there was little to no quantitative correlation of these results with tumor location and Gleason grade group. Technical hurdles are yet to be solved for precision radiotherapy to target the DILs based on physiological imaging. A Boolean sum volume (BSV) incorporating all available MR sequences may be reasonable in delineating the DIL boost volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Eric Carver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Aharon Feldman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Milan V Pantelic
- Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Mohamed Elshaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Ning Wen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lu W, Du P, Yang C, Jiang F, Xie P, Yang J, Zhang Z, Ma J. The Effect of Computed Tomography-Guided 125I Radioactive Particle Implantation in Treating Cancer and Its Pain. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2018; 33:176-181. [PMID: 29916744 DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2017.2425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Pain is a prevalent and serious problem in patients with cancer. This study aimed to investigate the clinical value of the implantation of radioactive particle 125I in treating cancer and its pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS From February 2014 to February 2015, 38 patients with malignant tumor received computed tomography (CT)-guided 125I radioactive particle implantation to treat cancer pain in this hospital. Before surgery, the lesions were calculated by brachytherapy treatment planning system (TPS) to get the local number of particles that are required for implantation. For a period after implantation, TPS was used again to assess the effect of treatment. The 38 patients received 6-month follow-up, and the CT scan was used to evaluate the local tumor. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the pain. RESULTS The curative effect was evaluated at postoperative 2, 4, and 6 months, and the curative effect was 34.2%, 73.68%, and 89.47%, respectively. The preoperative VAS score of the 38 patients was 5.48 ± 2.50 (13 cases of mild pain, 19 cases of moderate pain, and 6 cases of severe pain), and their pain was improved in different degrees after operation. CONCLUSIONS CT-guided 125I radioactive particle implantation is a safe and effective treatment for cancer and its pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Lu
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Peng Du
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Chao Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Fuqiang Jiang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Peng Xie
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Jian Yang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Zhang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| | - Junpeng Ma
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Navy General Hospital , Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, Mongiat-Artus P, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Brureau L, Ouzzane A, Azria D, Brenot-Rossi I, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Rebillard X, Lebret T, Soulié M, Penna RR, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : cancer de la prostate French ccAFU guidelines – Update 2018–2020: Prostate cancer. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S79-S130. [PMID: 30392712 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Rozet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, institut mutualiste Montsouris, université René-Descartes, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75674, Paris, France.
| | - C Hennequin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service de radiothérapie, Saint-Louis Hospital, AP-HP, 75010, Paris, France
| | - J-B Beauval
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, oncologie médicale, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, CHU Rangueil, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - P Beuzeboc
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, 92150, Suresnes, France
| | - L Cormier
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU François-Mitterrand, 21000, Dijon, France
| | - G Fromont-Hankard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; CHU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000, Tours, France
| | - P Mongiat-Artus
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, Paris cedex 10, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, clinique La Croix du Sud-Saint-Jean Languedoc, institut universitaire du cancer, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital de Rennes, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes cedex 9, France
| | - L Brureau
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Inserm, U1085, IRSET, 97145 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
| | - A Ouzzane
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Claude-Huriez, CHRU de Lille, rue Michel-Polonovski, 59000, Lille, France
| | - D Azria
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Inserm U1194, ICM, université de Montpellier, 34298, Montpellier, France
| | - I Brenot-Rossi
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, boulevard de Sainte-Marguerite, 13009, Marseille, France
| | - G Cancel-Tassin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; GRC no 5 ONCOTYPE-URO, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - O Cussenot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France
| | - X Rebillard
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, clinique mutualiste Beau-Soleil, 119, avenue de Lodève, 34070, Montpellier, France
| | - T Lebret
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, 92150, Suresnes, France
| | - M Soulié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Centre hospitalier universitaire Rangueil, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - R Renard Penna
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; GRC no 5 ONCOTYPE-URO, institut universitaire de cancérologie, Sorbonne université, 75020, Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, 75020, Paris, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 75015, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rozet F, Hennequin C, Beauval JB, Beuzeboc P, Cormier L, Fromont-Hankard G, Mongiat-Artus P, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Brureau L, Ouzzane A, Azria D, Brenot-Rossi I, Cancel-Tassin G, Cussenot O, Rebillard X, Lebret T, Soulié M, Renard Penna R, Méjean A. Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU – Actualisation 2018–2020 : cancer de la prostate. Prog Urol 2018; 28 Suppl 1:R81-R132. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
7
|
Zamboglou C, Eiber M, Fassbender TR, Eder M, Kirste S, Bock M, Schilling O, Reichel K, van der Heide UA, Grosu AL. Multimodal imaging for radiation therapy planning in patients with primary prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018; 8:8-16. [PMID: 33458410 PMCID: PMC7807571 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation of advanced imaging techniques like multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) or Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) planning of patients with primary prostate cancer demands several preconditions: accurate staging of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor mass, robust delineation of the intraprostatic gross tumor volume (GTV) and a reproducible characterization of the prostate cancer's biological properties. In the current review we searched for the currently available imaging techniques and we discussed their ability to fulfill these preconditions. We found that current pretreatment imaging was mainly performed with mpMRI and/or Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging. Both techniques offered an accurate detection of the extraprostatic and intraprostatic tumor burden and had a major impact on RT concepts. However, some studies postulated that mpMRI and PSMA PET had complementary information for intraprostatic GTV detection. Moreover, interobserver differences for intraprostatic tumor delineation based on mpMRI were observed. It is currently unclear whether PET based GTV delineation underlies also interobserver heterogeneity. Further research is warranted to answer whether multimodal imaging is able to visualize biological processes related to prostate cancer pathophysiology and radiation resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
- Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas R. Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eder
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Schilling
- Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Reichel
- Department of Urology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
| | - Uulke A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zamboglou C, Klein CM, Thomann B, Fassbender TF, Rischke HC, Kirste S, Henne K, Volegova-Neher N, Bock M, Langer M, Meyer PT, Baltas D, Grosu AL. The dose distribution in dominant intraprostatic tumour lesions defined by multiparametric MRI and PSMA PET/CT correlates with the outcome in patients treated with primary radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:65. [PMID: 29650029 PMCID: PMC5898009 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1014-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. .,Berta-Ottenstein-Programme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Christina Marie Klein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Thomann
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Franz Fassbender
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans C Rischke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Karl Henne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Natalja Volegova-Neher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Michael Bock
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Langer
- Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Philipp T Meyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mirjolet C, Boudon J, Loiseau A, Chevrier S, Boidot R, Oudot A, Collin B, Martin E, Joy PA, Millot N, Créhange G. Docetaxel-titanate nanotubes enhance radiosensitivity in an androgen-independent prostate cancer model. Int J Nanomedicine 2017; 12:6357-6364. [PMID: 28919739 PMCID: PMC5587207 DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s139167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Around 40% of high-risk prostate cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy (RT) will experience biochemical failure. Chemotherapy, such as docetaxel (DTX), can enhance the efficacy of RT. Multidrug resistance mechanisms often limit drug efficacy by decreasing intracellular concentrations of drugs in tumor cells. It is, therefore, of interest to develop nanocarriers of DTX to maintain the drug inside cancer cells and thus improve treatment efficacy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of titanate nanotubes (TiONts) to develop a TiONts-DTX nanocarrier and to evaluate its radiosensitizing in vivo efficacy in a prostate cancer model. In vitro cytotoxic activity of TiONts-DTX was evaluated using an MTS assay. The biodistribution of TiONts-DTX was analyzed in vivo by single-photon emission computed tomography. The benefit of TiONts-DTX associated with RT was evaluated in vivo. Eight groups with seven mice in each were used to evaluate the efficacy of the nanohybrid combined with RT: control with buffer IT injection ± RT, free DXL ± RT, TiONts ± RT and TiONts-DXL ± RT. Mouse behavior, health status and tumor volume were monitored twice a week until the tumor volume reached a maximum of 2,000 mm3. More than 70% of nanohybrids were localized inside the tumor 96 h after administration. Tumor growth was significantly slowed by TiONts-DTX associated with RT, compared with free DTX in the same conditions (P=0.013). These results suggest that TiONts-DTX improved RT efficacy and might enhance local control in high-risk localized prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Mirjolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Julien Boudon
- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Alexis Loiseau
- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Sandy Chevrier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Romain Boidot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Alexandra Oudot
- Preclinical Imaging Platform, Nuclear Medicine Department, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Bertrand Collin
- Preclinical Imaging Platform, Nuclear Medicine Department, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | | | - Nadine Millot
- Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guimas V, Quivrin M, Bertaut A, Martin E, Chambade D, Maingon P, Mazoyer F, Cormier L, Créhange G. Focal or whole-gland salvage prostate brachytherapy with iodine seeds with or without a rectal spacer for postradiotherapy local failure: How best to spare the rectum? Brachytherapy 2017; 15:406-411. [PMID: 27317949 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2016] [Revised: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 03/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Salvage prostate permanent implant (sPPI) for postradiation local failure provides high rates of biochemical control. The cumulative dose delivered to the prostate and the rectum is still unknown. METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed the postimplant CT-based dosimetry of 18 selected patients who underwent sPPI with (125)I seeds for isolated biopsy-proven local failure several years after external beam radiation therapy. Ten patients had whole-prostate sPPI, and 8 patients had multiparametric MRI-based focal sPPI. In 8 patients, hyaluronic acid (HA) gel was injected into the prostate-rectum space. RESULTS The median cumulative biological effective dose after EBRT + sPPI for the prostate and the rectum was higher in patients treated with whole-gland sPPI than in patients treated with focal sPPI (313.5 Gy2 vs. 174.4 Gy2; p = 0.06 and 258.1 Gy3 vs. 172.6 Gy3; p < 0.01, respectively). The median D0.1cc for the rectum was significantly lower in patients who had HA gel: 63.3 Gy (29.0-78.3) vs. 83.9 Gy (34.9-180.0) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS Cumulative prostate and rectum biological effective doses were lower with focal sPPI. D0.1cc delivered to the rectum was significantly lower with HA gel, while there was no difference between focal or whole-gland plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentine Guimas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Magali Quivrin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France; Medical Imaging Group, IMAC CNRS 6306, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Aurélie Bertaut
- Department of Biostatistics, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Etienne Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Damien Chambade
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Philippe Maingon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Frédéric Mazoyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France
| | - Luc Cormier
- Department of Urology, University Hospital François Mitterand, Dijon, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France; Medical Imaging Group, IMAC CNRS 6306, University of Burgundy, Dijon, Burgundy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Paoluzzi M, Losa A, Cerboneschi V, Colosimo C, Fontana N, Mangili P, Mignogna M, Nava L, Ravaglia V. Prostate-specific antigen percentage: An early predictive tool after iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Brachytherapy 2017. [PMID: 28642046 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After interstitial prostate iodine-125 brachytherapy (BT), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evolution in time could predict overall biochemical relapse, but, considering the single patient, it is influenced by the presentation PSA amount and by the prostatic volume. It is also challenging to differentiate a PSA bounce from a biochemical relapse. PURPOSE To determine the usefulness of PSA percentage (PP) defined as the rate between PSA presented by a patient at time "t" and the PSA that the same patient had presented at the time of diagnosis (t0) assumed as 100% in predicting biochemical relapse and in differentiating them from PSA Bounces. METHODS AND MATERIALS We included 721 patients from Milan S. Raffaele Turro (399) and Lucca Campo di Marte (then S. Luca) Hospital (322). The mean age of patients was 66.5 years (range, 50-79). Mean followup was 150 months (range, 24-180). For each patient, PSA was recorded before and after iodine-125 BT, and PPs were calculated. Cox regression model, relative operating characteristic curves, and Kaplan-Meier regression model were elaborated, and a cutoff of 20% was defined. RESULTS We observed that PP >20% is an independent variable highly associated with relapse risk (p < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 79.7%, a specificity of 82%, and an hazard ratio of 12.1, since the 6 months of followup. A PSA increase above the nadir should be because of bounce (sensitivity and specificity of 81.4%, p < 0.0001) if patient had experienced at 6 months a PP <20%. CONCLUSIONS PP might represent an early and useful tool, predictive of clinical outcome in patients after BT for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Paoluzzi
- Operative Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy.
| | - Andrea Losa
- Operative Unit of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - Valentina Cerboneschi
- Operative Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Colosimo
- Operative Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nicola Fontana
- Operative Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - Paola Mangili
- Operative Unit of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marcello Mignogna
- Operative Unit of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Turro Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luciano Nava
- Operative Unit of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| | - Valentina Ravaglia
- Operative Unit of Medical Physics, Department of Oncology, San Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of the guidelines national committee CCAFU was to propose updated french guidelines for localized and metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS A Medline search was achieved between 2013 and 2016, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of PCa, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS Epidemiology, classification, staging systems, diagnostic evaluation are reported. Disease management options are detailed. Recommandations are reported according to the different clinical situations. Active surveillance is a major option in low risk PCa. Radical prostatectomy remains a standard of care of localized PCa. The three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the technical standard. A dose of > 74Gy is recommended. Moderate hypofractionation provides short-term biochemical control comparable to conventional fractionation. In case of intermediate risk PCa, radiotherapy can be combined with short-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In case of high risk disease, long-term ADT remains the standard of care. ADT is the backbone therapy of metastatic disease. In men with metastases at first presentation, upfront chemotherapy combined with ADT should be considered as a new standard. In case of metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC), new hormonal treatments and chemotherapy provide a better control of tumor progression and increase survival. CONCLUSIONS These updated french guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for the diagnosis and treatment for prostate cancer. © 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Collapse
|