Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for central lung tumors: Plan quality and long-term clinical outcomes

Radiotherapy in the management of lung oligometastases

In recent years, the development of both medical imaging and new systemic agents (targeted therapy and immunotherapy) have revolutionized the field of oncology, leading to a new entity: oligometastatic disease. Adding local treatment of oligometastases to systemic treatment could lead to prolonged survival with no significant impact on quality of life. Given the high prevalence of lung oligometastases and the new systemic agents coming with increased pulmonary toxicity, this article provides a comprehensive review of the current state-of-art for radiotherapy of lung oligometastases. After reviewing pretreatment workup, the authors define several radiotherapy regimen based on the localization and size of the oligometastases. A comment on the synergistic combination of medical treatment and radiotherapy is also made, projecting on future steps in this specific clinical setting.

Widening the therapeutic window for central and ultra-central thoracic oligometastatic disease with stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART)

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Central/ultra-central thoracic tumors are challenging to treat with stereotactic radiotherapy due potential high-grade toxicity. Stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may improve the therapeutic window through motion control with breath-hold gating and real-time MR-imaging as well as the option for daily online adaptive replanning to account for changes in target and/or organ-at-risk (OAR) location.

MATERIALS/METHODS

26 central (19 ultra-central) thoracic oligoprogressive/oligometastatic tumors treated with isotoxic (OAR constraints-driven) 5-fraction SMART (median 50 Gy, range 35-60) between 10/2019-10/2022 were reviewed. Central tumor was defined as tumor within or touching 2 cm around proximal tracheobronchial tree (PBT) or adjacent to mediastinal/pericardial pleura. Ultra-central was defined as tumor abutting the PBT, esophagus, or great vessel. Hard OAR constraints observed were ≤ 0.03 cc for PBT V40, great vessel V52.5, and esophagus V35. Local failure was defined as tumor progression/recurrence within the planning target volume.

RESULTS

Tumor abutted the PBT in 31 %, esophagus in 31 %, great vessel in 65 %, and heart in 42 % of cases. 96 % of fractions were treated with reoptimized plan, necessary to meet OAR constraints (80 %) and/or target coverage (20 %). Median follow-up was 19 months (27 months among surviving patients). Local control (LC) was 96 % at 1-year and 90 % at 2-years (total 2/26 local failure). 23 % had G2 acute toxicities (esophagitis, dysphagia, anorexia, nausea) and one (4 %) had G3 acute radiation dermatitis. There were no G4-5 acute toxicities. There was no symptomatic pneumonitis and no G2 + late toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Isotoxic 5-fraction SMART resulted in high rates of LC and minimal toxicity. This approach may widen the therapeutic window for high-risk oligoprogressive/oligometastatic thoracic tumors.

Ten years outcomes after SABR in central and ultracentral primary lung tumors

PURPOSE

SABR performed for central and ultracentral lung tumors is associated with increased toxicity but limited data is available on late toxicities. We studied toxicity in patients followed-up ≥ 2 years post-SABR at a single-institution.

METHODS

All patients were treated using VMAT for a primary or recurrent central lung cancer between 2008-2015. 60 Gy was delivered in 8 or 12 fractions. Grade ≥ 3 clinical and radiological bronchial toxicity was scored. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios.

RESULTS

Of 127 eligible patients, 63% were treated with 8 fractions. Median tumor diameter was 4.4 cm (range 1.3-12.0). Median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% CI 16.5-33.5); 4% developed isolated local recurrences. The actuarial 5-year rate for severe clinical toxicity was 34.1% (95% CI 21.2-44.9). Both clinical toxicity and fatal lung haemorrhage were most observed when tumors were located ≤ 1 cm from the trachea or main bronchi (46% of all cases). The 5-year actuarial rate of radiological bronchial toxicity was 37.5% (95% CI 21.5-50.2). Multivariable analysis revealed that a performance score of 2 or 3 (HR 3.6; 95% CI 1.7-7.8), and tumor location ≤ 1 cm from the trachea or main bronchi (HR 4.3; 95% CI 1.2-14.9) were significant predictors for severe clinical toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The actuarial rates for both severe clinical and radiological bronchial toxicity after central SABR was approximately 35% in patients surviving 5 years. Patients with tumors located ≤ 1 cm from the trachea or main bronchus were at the highest risk for severe clinical toxicity.

Simulating the Potential of Model-Based Individualized Prescriptions for Ultracentral Lung Tumors

Purpose

The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy for ultracentral lung tumors is limited by increased toxicity. We hypothesized that using published normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability (TCP) models could improve the therapeutic ratio between tumor control and toxicity. A proposed model-based approach was applied to virtually replan early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumors.

Methods and Materials

The analysis included 63 patients with ultracentral NSCLC tumors treated at our center between 2008 and 2017. Along with current clinical constraints, additional NTCP model-based criteria, including for grade 3+ radiation pneumonitis (RP3+) and grade 2+ esophagitis, were implemented using 4 different fractionation schemes. Scaled dose distributions resulting in the highest TCP without violating constraints were selected (optimal plan [Planopt]). Planopt predictions were compared with the observed local control and toxicities.

Results

The observed 2-year local control rate was 72% (95% CI, 57%-88%) compared with 87% (range, 6%-93%) for Planopt TCP. Thirty-nine patients had Planopt with TCP > 80%, and 14 patients had Planopt TCP < 50%. The Planopt NTCPs for RP3+ were reduced by nearly half compared with patients' observed RP3+. The RP3+ NTCP was the most frequent reason for TCP of Planopt < 80% (14/24 patients), followed by grade 2+ esophagitis NTCP (5/24 patients) due to larger tumors (>40 cc vs ≤40 cc; P = .002) or a shorter tumor to esophagus distance (≥5 cm vs <5 cm; P < .001).

Conclusions

We demonstrated the potential for model-based prescriptions to yield higher TCP while respecting NTCP for patients with ultracentral NSCLC. Individualizing treatments based on NTCP- and TCP-driven simulations halved the predicted relative to the observed rates of RP3+. Our simulations also identified patients whose TCP could not be improved without violating NTCP due to larger tumors or a near tumor to esophagus proximity.

A competing risk analysis of the patterns and risk factors of recurrence in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

To assess patterns of recurrence after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patient ineligible to surgery with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC), report survival and treatment after first recurrence.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis on 1068 patients with ES-NSCLC and 1143 lesions. Between group differences were estimated using competing risk analysis and cause-specific hazard ratios were calculated. Overall survival (OS) after first recurrence was calculated.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 37.6 months. Univariate analysis demonstrated that ultra-central location was associated with higher risk of regional recurrence (RR) and distant metastasis (DM) (p = 0.004 and 0.01). Central lesions were associated with higher risk of local recurrence (LR) and RR (p < 0.001). Ultra-central lesions were associated with shorter OS (p = 0.002) compared to peripheral lesions. In multivariate analysis, central location was the only factor associated with increased LR and RR risks (p = 0.016 and 0.005). Median OS after first recurrence was 14.8 months. There was no difference in OS after first recurrence between ultra-central, central, and peripheral lesions (p = 0.83). Patients who received a second SABR course had an OS of 51.3 months, compared to 19.5 months with systemic therapy and 8.1 months with supportive care (p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

The main prognostic factor for LR and RR risks was central location. Ultra-central and central tumors might benefit from treatment intensification strategies such as dose escalation and/or addition of systemic therapy to improve radiotherapy outcomes. After a first recurrence post SABR, patients with contralateral lung recurrences and those who were eligible to receive a second course of SABR had improved OS.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes of Single- and Five-Fraction Schedules of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Early-Stage Central or Peripheral NSCLC

Background: The treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) frequently involves different fractionation schemes for peripheral and central tumors due to concerns with toxicity. We performed an observational cohort study to determine survival outcomes for patients with peripheral and central NSCLC treated with SBRT. Methods: A single-institutional database of patients with early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT from September 2008 to December 2018 was evaluated. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), local failure (LF), nodal failure (NF), and distant failure (DF). Cox multivariable analysis (MVA), Kaplan–Meier plotting, Fine–Gray competing risk MVA, and propensity score matching were performed. Results: A total of 265 patients were included with a median follow-up of 44.2 months. There were 191 (72%) and 74 (28%) patients with peripheral and central tumors treated with single-fraction SBRT to a dose of 27 Gy and five-fraction SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy, respectively. On Cox MVA, there was no difference in OS (adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) of 1.04, 95% CI of 0.74–1.46) or PFS (aHR of 1.05, 95% CI of 0.76–1.45). On Fine–Gray competing risk MVA, there were no differences in LF, NF, or DF. Propensity matching confirmed these findings. Conclusion: The survival outcomes of patients treated with SBRT for early-stage NSCLC were equivalent for central and peripheral tumors.

UK 2022 Consensus on Normal Tissue Dose-Volume Constraints for Oligometastatic, Primary Lung and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in the UK has expanded over the past decade, in part as the result of several UK clinical trials and a recent NHS England Commissioning through Evaluation programme. A UK SABR Consortium consensus for normal tissue constraints for SABR was published in 2017, based on the existing literature at the time. The published literature regarding SABR has increased in volume over the past 5 years and multiple UK centres are currently working to develop new SABR services. A review and update of the previous consensus is therefore appropriate and timely. It is hoped that this document will provide a useful resource to facilitate safe and consistent SABR practice.

Bronchial stenosis in central pulmonary tumors treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Bronchial stenosis in central lung tumors after SBRT

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in lung tumors has an excellent local control due to the high delivered dose. Proximity of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT) to the high dose area may result in pulmonary toxicity. Bronchial stenosis is an adverse event that can occur after high dose to the PBT. Literature on the risk of developing bronchial stenosis is limited. We therefore evaluated the risk of bronchial stenosis for tumors central to the PBT and correlated the dose to the bronchi.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with a planning tumor volume (PTV) ≤2cm from PBT receiving SBRT (8 × 7.5Gy) between 2015-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Main bronchi and lobar bronchi were manually delineated. Follow-up CT-scans were analyzed for bronchial stenosis and atelectasis. Bronchial stenosis was assessed using CTCAEv4. Patient, tumor, dosimetric factors and survival were evaluated between patients with and without stenosis using uni- and multivariate and Kaplan Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were analyzed with a median age of 70 years and WHO≤1 in 92.2%. Median follow-up was 36 months (IQR 19.6-45.4) and median OS 48 months (IQR 21.5-59.3). In fifteen patients (29.4%) bronchial stenosis was observed on FU-CT-scan. Grade 1 stenosis was seen in 21.6% (n=11), grade 2 in 7.8% (n=4). No grade ≥3 stenosis was observed. Median time to stenosis was 9.6 months (IQR 4.4-19.2). Patients who developed stenosis had significantly larger gross tumor volume (GTV) with a median of 19cc (IQR 7.7-63.2) versus 5.2cc (IQR 1.7-11.3, p<0.01). Prognostic factors in multivariate analysis for stenosis were age (p=0.03; OR 1.1), baseline dyspnea (p=0.02 OR 7.7) and the mean lobar bronchus dose (p=0.01; OR 1.1).

CONCLUSION

Low grade (≤2) lobar bronchial stenosis is a complication in approximately one third of patients following SBRT for lung tumors with a PTV ≤2cm from PBT. Prognostic risk factors were age, baseline dyspnea and mean dose on a lobar bronchus.

Advances and controversies in the management of early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Complete resection continues to be the gold standard for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. The landmark Lung Cancer Study Group trial in 1995 established lobectomy as the minimum intervention necessary for the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer, as it was associated with lower recurrence and metastasis rates than sublobar resection and lower postoperative morbidity and mortality than pneumonectomy. There is a growing tendency to perform sublobar resection in selected cases, as, depending on factors such as tumor size, histologic subtype, lymph node involvement, and resection margins, it can produce similar oncological results to lobectomy. Alternative treatments such as stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiofrequency ablation can also produce good outcomes in inoperable patients or patients who refuse surgery.

Medical consequences of radiation exposure of the bronchi-what can we learn from high-dose precision radiation therapy?

The bronchial tolerance to high doses of radiation is not fully understood. However, in the event of a radiological accident with unintended exposure of the central airways to high doses of radiation it would be important to be able to anticipate the clinical consequences given the magnitude of the absorbed dose to different parts of the bronchial tree. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a radiation treatment technique involving a few large fractions of photon external-beam radiation delivered to a well-defined target in the body. Despite generally favourable results, with high local tumour control and low-toxicity profile, its utility for tumours located close to central thoracic structures has been questioned, considering reports of severe toxic symptoms such as haemoptysis (bleedings from the airways), bronchial necrosis, bronchial stenosis, fistulas and pneumonitis. In conjunction with patient- and tumour-related risk factors, recent studies have analysed the absorbed radiation dose to different thoracic structures of normal tissue to better understand their tolerance to these high doses per fraction. Although the specific mechanisms behind the toxicity are still partly unknown, dose to the proximal bronchial tree has been shown to correlate with high-grade radiation side effects. Still, there is no clear consensus on the tolerance dose of the different bronchial structures. Recent data indicate that a too high dose to a main bronchus may result in more severe clinical side effects as compared to a smaller sized bronchus. This review analyses the current knowledge on the clinical consequences of bronchial exposure to high dose hypofractionated radiation delivered with the SBRT technique, and the tolerance doses of the bronchi. It presents the current literature regarding types of high-grade clinical side effects, data on dose response and comments on other risk factors for high-grade toxic effects.

Variation of Tumor Volume During Moderate Hypo-Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Lung Cancer

Aim To investigate the variation of tumor volume during moderate hypo-fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Patients and Methods Twenty patients, who received SBRT at our institution, were included in the analysis. A prescribed dose was 56 Gy at iso-center in seven fractions. Tumor volumes before and during SBRT were calculated. In order to investigate factors affecting the variation of tumor volume in RT 2 (after first irradiation) and RT 7 (after last irradiation), various parameters were verified by the Mann-Whitney U test. Results With regard to the low maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) group, transient increase of tumor volume was found in RT 2, and tumor volume reduction was hardly found in RT 7. With regard to the high SUVmax group, a transient increase was not found, and a definite reduction was found in the treatment course. Conclusion Accurate prediction of tumor volume variation is required for more accurate treatment, such as adaptive radiation therapy.

Safety and efficacy of 10-fraction hypofractionated radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To investigate the safety and efficacy of hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who are unfit for surgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) at our institution.

Materials and Methods

From May 2007 to December 2018, HFRT was used to treat 68 lesions in 64 patients who were unsuitable for SBRT because of central tumor location, large tumor size, or contiguity with the chest wall. The HFRT schedule included a dose of 50–70 Gy delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. The primary outcome was freedom from local progression (FFLP), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and toxicities.

Results

The median follow-up period was 25.5 months (range, 5.3 to 119.9 months). The FFLP rates were 79.8% and 67.8% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS rates were 82.8% and 64.1% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. A larger planning target volume was associated with lower FFLP (p = 0.023). Dose escalation was not associated with FFLP (p = 0.964). Four patients (6.3%) experienced grade 3–5 pulmonary toxicities. Tumor location, central or peripheral, was not associated with either grade 3 or higher toxicity.

Conclusion

HFRT with 50–70 Gy in 10 fractions demonstrated acceptable toxicity; however, the local control rate can be improved compared with the results of SBRT. More studies are required in patients who are unfit for SBRT to investigate the optimal fractionation scheme.

Stereotactic Radiation for Lung Cancer: A Practical Approach to Challenging Scenarios

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for medically inoperable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT is a noninvasive treatment involving the delivery of ablative radiation doses with high precision in the course of a few treatments. Relative to conventionally fractionated radiation, SBRT achieves superior local control and survival. SBRT use has increased dramatically in the past 15 years and is currently considered the standard of care in cases of inoperable early stage NSCLC. It is being increasingly applied to more complex patient populations at higher risk of treatment-related toxicity. In these more complex patients, there is an increasing need to balance patient and treatment factors in selecting the optimal patients for SBRT. Here, we review several challenging clinical scenarios often encountered in thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards.

Hypofractionation in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiation treatment of early stage nonsmall cell lung cancer has evolved over the past 2 decades to progressively more hypofractionated treatment courses. Results comparable to surgical resection are seen with stereotactic body radiotherapy, which is now the standard of care for medically inoperable patients, and a treatment option for operable patients as well. Understanding of the optimal radiation dose and fractionation are evolving, especially for central tumors which have higher treatment toxicity than peripheral tumors.

A single institutional experience with central lung stereotactic body radiation therapy demonstrating encouraging results with increased inter-fraction time

Background

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective treatment modality for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, there are concerns regarding potential toxicity for centrally located tumors.

Methods

This retrospective study considered patients with SBRT for central lung NSCLC (defined as a tumor within 2 cm of any mediastinal critical structure). The institutional protocol was that patients with central tumors received SBRT less frequently than daily—generally once or twice weekly.

Results

A total of 115 patients with 148 lesions were treated with SBRT to a median 45 [5–60] Gy in 4 [1–5] fractions over a median 5.3 [0–18] days. Many patients treated with this method presented with advanced disease: 58 treatments involved nodal targets, and 42 had stage 3 disease. 52% of patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and only 49% had a biopsy, often due to concerns regarding other medical comorbidities. Rates of prior chemotherapy, thoracic surgery, and thoracic radiotherapy were 32%, 21%, and 49%, respectively. Via the Kaplan-Meier method, 2-year overall survival was 65%, and 2-year local control was 77%. Two-year local-progression free survival was 53%, and 2-year progression-survival was 48%. Treatments for stage 3 disease had an impressive 82% 2-year local control that was comparable to early stage treatments. Patients with stage 3 disease had a 2-year overall survival of 59%, which trended towards decreased overall survival compared to early stage patients. There were 13 grade 1 (9%) and 14 grade 2 (9%) toxicities. There were no reported grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities and only 3 cases of pneumonitis.

Conclusions

Our series demonstrates encouraging local control with low rates of toxicity for central lung SBRT, including many stage 3 patients. This may be the result of the relatively large inter-fraction interval. This interval may allow for greater tumor effects (such as reoxygenation) and improved tolerance from normal tissues.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for central and ultracentral node-negative lung tumors

Advancements in imaging and radiotherapy (RT) techniques have allowed for remarkably precise delivery of high radiation dose per treatment fraction to intrathoracic targets. As a non-invasive therapeutic modality (compared to surgery), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an attractive option for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancers and oligometastases, especially for older patients with significant comorbidities and pre-existing pulmonary dysfunction. However, the outcomes and side effect profile of SBRT are highly dependent on tumor location, especially if the tumor is located centrally (within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree (PBT)] or ultracentrally (touching or within 1 cm of the mediastinum, esophagus, and PBT). In this focused review, we will examine the contemporary practice and principles of using hypofractionated RT or SBRT for central and ultracentral thoracic tumors. We will identify future directions on how this practice may be incorporated into the increasingly complicated modern paradigm of lung cancer treatments which now include immunotherapy along with proton beam radiotherapy.

Image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering proton therapy in the management of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of centrally-located early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is challenging due to the proximity of critical normal structures to the tumor target. The purpose of this study was to report the results of our experience in treating centrally-located early-stage NSCLC with hypofractionated proton therapy (PT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2018, 23 patients with T1-T2N0M0 NSCLC (T1, 46%; T2, 54%) were treated with image-guided hypofractionated double-scattering PT. The median age at the time of treatment was 74 years (range, 58-88). Patients underwent 4-dimensional computed tomography (CT) simulation following fiducial marker placement, and daily image guidance was performed. All patients were treated with 60 GyRBE in 10 fractions. Patients were assessed for CTCAEv4 toxicities weekly during treatment, and at regular follow-up intervals with CT imaging for tumor assessment. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, regional control, and metastases-free survival were evaluated using cumulative incidence with competing risks.

RESULTS

Median follow-up for all patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.2-9.2 years). Overall survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 50% (95% CI, 27-79%), respectively. Cause-specific survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 81% and 71% (95% CI, 46-92%). The 3-year local, regional, and distant control rates were 90%, 81%, and 87%, respectively. Three patients (13%) experienced local recurrences as their first recurrence, at a median time of 28 months from completion of radiation (range, 18-61 months). Two patients (9%) experienced late grade 3 toxicities, including 1 patient who developed a bronchial stricture that required stent placement.

CONCLUSION

Image-guided hypofractionated PT for centrally-located early-stage NSCLC provides excellent local control with low rates of grade ≥3 toxicities. For tumors in sensitive locations, PT may provide safer treatment than photon-based treatments due to its dosimetric advantages.

Clinical Outcomes and Predictors of Lung Toxicity After Multiple Courses of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of multicourse lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have yet to be validated in a prospective study, and there are a lack of data on allowable composite dosimetry.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients underwent multicourse lung SBRT for recurrent or metachronous NSCLC. The median biologically effective dose (BED₁₀) for the first course and subsequent courses were 132 and 100 Gy, respectively. Patient and treatment characteristics were evaluated to determine the correlation with the development of radiation pneumonitis (RP).

RESULTS

The local control rate was 91%. A total of 13.6% developed a grade 2+ RP, and 4.5% developed a grade 3+ RP, including one grade 5. On univariable analysis, multiple composite dosimetric factors (V₅ [proportion of lung structure receiving at least 5 Gy], V₁₀, V₂₀, V₄₀, and mean lung dose) were correlated with the development of RP. When comprised of the first and second course of SBRT, a composite lung V₅ of < 30% and > 50% was associated with a 0 and 75% incidence of grade 2+ RP, respectively. We identified no significant correlation on multivariable analysis but observed a strong trend between composite lung V₅ and the development of grade 2+ RP (hazard ratio, 1.157; P = .058). Evaluation of multiple clinical factors also identified a significant correlation between the timing of repeat lung SBRT and the development of grade 2+ RP after the second course (P = .0028).

CONCLUSION

Subsequent courses of lung SBRT, prescribed to a median BED₁₀ of 100 Gy, can provide a high rate of local control with a 4.5% incidence of grade 3+ toxicity. Composite lung V₅ and the timing of the second course of lung SBRT may be correlated to the development of RP.

Correlation of dosimetric factors with the development of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis in stereotactic body radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The development of radiation pneumonitis (RP) after Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) is known to be associated with many different factors, although historical analyses of RP have commonly utilized heterogeneous fractionation schemes and methods of reporting. This study aims to correlate dosimetric values and their association with the development of Symptomatic RP according to recent reporting standards as recommended by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective review for patients who received SBRT to the lung from 2010 to 2017. Inclusion criteria required near-homogeneous tumoricidal (α/β = 10 Gy) biological effective dose (BED10) of 100-105 Gy (e.g., 50/5, 48/4, 60/8), one or two synchronously treated lesions, and at least 6 months of follow up or documented evidence of pneumonitis. Symptomatic RP was determined clinically by treating radiation oncologists, requiring radiographic evidence and the administration of steroids. Dosimetric parameters and patient factors were recorded. Lung volumes subtracted gross tumor volume(s). Wilcoxon Rank Sums tests were used for nonparametric comparison of dosimetric data between patients with and without RP; p-values were Bonferroni adjusted when applicable. Logistic regressions were conducted to predict probabilities of symptomatic RP using univariable models for each radiation dosimetric parameter.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 103 treated lesions in 93 patients, eight of whom developed symptomatic RP (n = 8; 8.6%). The use of total mean lung dose (MLD) > 6 Gy alone captured five of the eight patients who developed symptomatic RP, while V20 > 10% captured two patients, both of whom demonstrated a MLD > 6 Gy. The remaining three patients who developed symptomatic RP without exceeding either metric were noted to have imaging evidence of moderate interstitial lung disease, inflammation of the lungs from recent concurrent chemoradiation therapy to the contralateral lung, or unique peri-tumoral inflammatory appearance at baseline before treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the largest dosimetric analysis of symptomatic RP in the literature, of which we are aware, that utilizes near-homogenous tumoricidal BED fractionation schemes. Mean lung dose and V20 are the most consistently reported of the various dosimetric parameters associated with symptomatic RP. MLD should be considered alongside V20 in the treatment planning process.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered on IRB 398-17-EP.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of 60 Gy in eight fractions is safe for ultracentral non-small cell lung cancer

Background

There is no consensus on the definition or recommended radiotherapy treatment of ultracentral non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report our institution's experience in treating ultracentral lung cancer patients with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) of 60 Gy in eight fractions.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of 21 ultracentral NSCLC patients treated with 60 Gy SABR in eight fractions. We defined ultracentral lung cancer as the planning target volume (PTV) directly abutting or overlapping central structures, including the proximal bronchial tree, heart, and great vessels but not the esophagus. The Kaplan‐Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and local control (LC). Toxicity was scored per the CTCAE v4.03.

Results

The median follow‐up time was 15 months, and the median OS was 15 months. The one‐ and two‐year OS rates were 87.5% and 76.6%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year PFS rates were 71.1% and 64.0%, respectively. The one‐ and two‐year LC rates were 92.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The rate of grade 2 treatment‐related toxicities was 19.1%. There was no grade ≥ 3 treatment‐related toxicity.

Conclusion

SABR of 60 Gy in eight fractions is feasible for ultracentral NSCLC.

Toxicity and Efficacy of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Moderately Central Non-small Cell Lung Cancers Using 50 Gy in Five Fractions

AIMS

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy doses for peripheral lung lesions caused high toxicity when used for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To determine a safe stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy dose for central tumours, the phase I/II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG 0813 trial used 50 Gy/five fractions as a baseline. From 2013, 50 Gy/five fractions was adopted at the Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre for inoperable early stage central NSCLC. We report our prospectively collected toxicity and efficacy data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient and treatment characteristics were obtained from electronic medical records. Tumours were classed as moderately central or ultra-central tumours using published definitions. Toxicity was assessed in a centralised follow-up clinic at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after treatment.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (31 women, 19 men, median age 75.1 years) were identified with T1-2N0M0 moderately central NSCLC; one patient had both an ultra-central and a moderately central tumour. Eighty-four per cent were medically unfit for surgery. Forty per cent had biopsy-proven NSCLC and 60% were diagnosed radiologically using 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging. Fifty-six per cent of patients were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 2 or worse. All patients received 50 Gy/five fractions on alternate days on schedule. Two patients died within 90 days of treatment, one from a chest infection, the other cause of death was unknown. There was one episode of early grade 3 oesophagitis and one grade 3 late dyspnoea. There was no grade 4 toxicity. Over a median follow-up of 25.2 months (range 1-70 months), there were 34 deaths: 18 unrelated to cancer and 16 due to cancer recurrence. The median overall survival was 27.0 months (95% confidence interval 20.6-35.9) and cancer-specific survival was 39.8 months (95% confidence interval 28.6, not reached).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that 50 Gy/five fractions is a safe dose and fractionation for early stage inoperable moderately central NSCLC, with outcomes comparable with other series, even with patients with a poor performance status.

Safety and Efficacy of a Five-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Schedule for Centrally Located Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: NRG Oncology/RTOG 0813 Trial

PURPOSE

Patients with centrally located early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are at a higher risk of toxicity from high-dose ablative radiotherapy. NRG Oncology/RTOG 0813 was a phase I/II study designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), efficacy, and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally located NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medically inoperable patients with biopsy-proven, positron emission tomography-staged T1 to 2 (≤ 5 cm) N0M0 centrally located NSCLC were accrued into a dose-escalating, five-fraction SBRT schedule that ranged from 10 to 12 Gy/fraction (fx) delivered over 1.5 to 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any treatment-related grade 3 or worse predefined toxicity that occurred within the first year. MTD was defined as the SBRT dose at which the probability of DLT was closest to 20% without exceeding it.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients were accrued between February 2009 and September 2013. Patients were elderly, there were slightly more females, and the majority had a performance status of 0 to 1. Most cancers were T1 (65%) and squamous cell (45%). Organs closest to planning target volume/most at risk were the main bronchus and large vessels. Median follow-up was 37.9 months. Five patients experienced DLTs; MTD was 12.0 Gy/fx, which had a probability of a DLT of 7.2% (95% CI, 2.8% to 14.5%). Two-year rates for the 71 evaluable patients in the 11.5 and 12.0 Gy/fx cohorts were local control, 89.4% (90% CI, 81.6% to 97.4%) and 87.9% (90% CI, 78.8% to 97.0%); overall survival, 67.9% (95% CI, 50.4% to 80.3%) and 72.7% (95% CI, 54.1% to 84.8%); and progression-free survival, 52.2% (95% CI, 35.3% to 66.6%) and 54.5% (95% CI, 36.3% to 69.6%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The MTD for this study was 12.0 Gy/fx; it was associated with 7.2% DLTs and high rates of tumor control. Outcomes in this medically inoperable group of mostly elderly patients with comorbidities were comparable with that of patients with peripheral early-stage tumors.

Safety and Effectiveness of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Ultra-Central Lung Lesions: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The safety and effectiveness of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with ultra-central lung tumors is currently unclear. We performed a systematic review to summarize existing data and identify trends in treatment-related toxicity and local control following SABR in patients with ultra-central lung lesions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using the PubMed and Embase databases. The databases were queried from dates of inception until September 27, 2018. Studies in the English language that reported treatment-related toxicity and local control outcomes post-SABR for patients with ultra-central lung lesions were included. Guidelines, reviews, non-peer reviewed correspondences, studies focused on re-irradiation, and studies with fewer than five patients were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 446 studies were identified, with 10 meeting all criteria for inclusion. The total sample size from the identified studies was 250 ultra-central lung patients and all studies were retrospective in design. Radiotherapy dose and fractionation ranged from 30 to 60 Gy in 3 to 12 fractions, with biologically effective doses (BED₁₀) ranging from 48 to 138 Gy₁₀ (median, 78-103 Gy₁₀). Median treatment-related grade 3 or greater toxicity was 10% (range, 0-50%). Median treatment-related mortality was 5% (range, 0-22%), most commonly from pulmonary hemorrhage (55%). High-risk indicators for SABR-related mortality included gross endobronchial disease, maximum dose to the proximal bronchial tree greater than or equal to 180 Gy₃ (BED₃, corresponding to 45 Gy in 5 fractions or 55 Gy in 8 fractions), peri-SABR bevacizumab use, and antiplatelet/anticoagulant use. Median 1-year local control rate was 96% (range, 63%-100%) and 2-year local control rate was 92% (range, 57%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

SABR for ultra-central lung lesions appears feasible but there is a potential for severe toxicity in patients receiving high doses to the proximal bronchial tree, those with endobronchial disease, and those receiving bevacizumab or anticoagulants around the time of SABR. Prospective studies are required to establish the optimal doses, volumes, and normal tissue tolerances for SABR in this patient population.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Primary Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for centrally located, primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Systematic search of 4 databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) was performed for literature published until May 9, 2018. Primary (overall survival [OS] and local control [LC] rates) and secondary (Grade ≥3 toxicity) endpoints were reported.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies encompassing 599 patients with central NSCLCs were included. Median values of T1 tumor proportion, tumor size, and median survival were 55.3% (range, 0%-75%), 3.3 (range, 2.1-4.1) cm, and 26 (range, 14-68.9) months, respectively. Pooled rates of 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS rates were 84.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.7-90.3), 64.0% (95% CI, 52.9-72.2), and 50.5% (95% CI, 39.4-61.5), respectively. Pooled rates of 1-, 2-, and 3-year LC rates were 89.4% (95% CI, 80.8-94.4), 82.2% (95% CI, 71.7-89.4), and 72.2% (95% CI, 55.0-84.7), respectively. Pooled rate of Grade ≥3 complication was 12.0% (95% CI, 7.3-19.0). Meta-regression analyses showed significant positive relationships between biologically equivalent dose using an α/β of 10 Gy in the linear quadratic model (BED_10Gy) and 1- and 2-year LC rates (P < .001 and P < .001), and 1- and 2-year OS rates (P = .0178 and P = .032), and Grade ≥3 complication rate (P = .0029). In subgroup comparisons between BED_10Gy <100 Gy versus ≥100 Gy, 1- and 2-year LC rates were significantly different but not for OS and Grade ≥3 complication rates.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggests that SBRT is potent for tumor control in central NSCLC, although complications should be further minimized through optimization of dose-fractionation scheme and accurate planning. Using BED_10Gy ≥100 Gy yielded higher LC rates, and dose escalation was related to OS, LC, and complications.

Accelerated Hypofractionated Radiotherapy Versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Stage I Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer-A Single Institution Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up

Purpose:

Although stereotactic body radiation therapy is one of the standard treatments for stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer, in the case of central tumors it carries the risk of severe adverse events for serial organs. Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy is considered a reasonable alternative to treat central tumors. We have been treating central tumors with accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy using a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen, and we compared the results with those of stereotactic body radiation therapy using 48 Gy/4 fr/1 week.

Methods:

Patients with central tumors and/or unfit for 1-hour fixation were candidates for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy. Based on the proximity to the biologically effective dose at 10 Gy, above accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen was adopted.

Results:

From October 2003 to December 2010, 159 patients, who received either accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy (103 cases) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (56 cases), were included in the analysis. In the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, 40 (39%) cases were central tumors, whereas all cases were peripheral tumors in the stereotactic body radiation therapy group. Overall 5-year local control and survival rates were 81.9% (95% confidence interval 73.6%-90.1%) and 46.5% (95% confidence interval 36.7%-56.2%), respectively for the accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy group, and 75.4% (95% confidence interval 63.0%-87.8%) and 44.6% (95% confidence interval 31.6%-57.7%), respectively for the stereotactic body radiation therapy group (n.s.). Among central tumors, ultracentral tumors (21 cases) and the remaining central tumors (19 cases) were similar in both local control and survival. On multivariate analysis, hazard ratios for accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiation therapy were <1 for both local control and survival. Pulmonary toxicity was similar in both groups. No serial organ toxicity was observed for central tumors.

Conclusions:

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with a 75 Gy/25 fr/5 weeks regimen is promising in that it can obtain similar local control and survival results to stereotactic body radiation therapy, and it can control both central and peripheral tumors without any serial organ toxicities. Based on these results, prospective multicenter trials are worth conducting, especially for ultracentral tumors.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes and Safety Profile of SBRT for Centrally Located NSCLC

Purpose

Previous studies suggest that stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is associated with higher toxicity rates for central lung tumors relative to peripheral tumors when using 3 fraction SBRT. The initial results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study 0813 suggest a safe toxicity profile of SBRT administered in 5 fractions for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We reviewed our institutional data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SBRT for central NSCLC.

Methods and materials

We reviewed our prospectively collected SBRT database for patients with central NSCLC who received SBRT between 2008 and 2014. The most frequent dose and fractionations were 50 Gy in 5 fractions (59%) and 48 Gy in 4 fraction (30%). Local control (LC), regional control, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminal Criteria for Adverse Events were used for toxicity grading.

Results

A total of 110 central lung tumors in 103 patients were included. The median age was 74 years (range, 40-95 years), and the median follow-up time of living patients was 50 months. The mean tumor size was 20 mm (range, 5-70 mm). The 5 year rate of LC, regional control, and distant control was 89%, 77%, and 82%, respectively. The median and 5-year overall survival were 3.5 years and 35%, respectively. No treatment variables were associated with tumor control or other clinical outcomes. A single patient experienced grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (0.97%). The rate of late toxicity grade ≥3 was 9.7% (grade 3, 7.7%; grade 4, 0.97%; grade 5, 0.97%) and included pneumonitis (3.9%), bronchial necrosis (2.9%), myocardial dysfunction (1.9%), and worsening heart failure (0.97%).

Conclusions

SBRT for central NSCLC provides high rates of LC. Despite excellent LC, patients remain at risk for regional and distant failure. The rate of grade 3 pneumonitis was consistent with that of prior reports. We observed low rates of grade 4-5 toxicity potentially attributable to SBRT. Our results contribute to the growing body of data in support of the safety of SBRT for central NSCLC.

Feasibility of markerless 3D position monitoring of the central airways using kilovoltage projection images: Managing the risks of central lung stereotactic radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Central lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) can cause proximal bronchial tree (PBT) toxicity. Information on PBT position relative to the high-dose could aid risk management. We investigated template matching + triangulation for high-frequency markerless 3D PBT position monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Kilovoltage projections of a moving phantom (full-fan cone-beam CT [CBCT, 15 frames/second] without MV irradiation: 889 images/dataset + CBCT and 7 frames/second fluoroscopy with MV irradiation) and ten patients undergoing free-breathing stereotactic/hypofractionated lung irradiation (full-fan CBCT without MV irradiation, 470-500 images/dataset) were retrospectively analyzed. 2D PBT reference templates (1 filtered digitally reconstructed radiograph/°) were created from planning CT data. Using normalized cross-correlation, templates were matched to projection images for 2D position. Multiple registrations were triangulated for 3D position.

RESULTS

For the phantom, 2D right/left PBT position could be determined in 86.6/75.1% of the CBCT dataset without MV irradiation, and 3D position (excluding first 20° due to the minimum triangulation angle) in 84.7/72.7%. With MV irradiation, this was up to 2% less. For right/left PBT, root-mean-square errors of measured versus "known" position were 0.5/0.8, 0.4-0.5/0.7, and 0.4/0.5-0.6 mm for left-right, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior directions, respectively. 2D PBT position was determined in, on average, 89.8% of each patient dataset (range: 79.4-99.2%), and 3D position (excluding first 20°) in 85.1% (range: 67.9-99.6%). Motion was mainly superior-inferior (range: 4.5-13.6 mm, average: 8.5 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency 3D PBT position verification during free-breathing is technically feasible using markerless template matching + triangulation of kilovoltage projection images acquired during gantry rotation. Applications include organ-at-risk position monitoring during central lung SBRT.

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for early-stage central lung tumors: New insights and approaches

The use of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for central lung tumors is increasing. Centrally located lung tumors can be subdivided into two categories, namely the 'moderately central' tumors where the planning target volume is located within 2 cm of the proximal bronchial tree, and the 'ultracentral' tumors where a planning target volume (PTV) overlaps the trachea or main stem bronchi. The toxicity of SABR appears acceptable when 'moderately central' tumors are treated using techniques that comply with organs at risk tolerance doses used for prospective trials and in recent publications. A high toxicity is seen when ultracentral tumors are treated using SABR, and conventional radiotherapy appears more appropriate in such tumors as the true normal organ tolerance doses remain unknown. When ultracentral tumors are treated with non-SABR hypofractionated radiotherapy, a homogenous dose distribution in the planning target volume and limitation of both normal organ maximum point doses and volumes receiving high doses seems to be needed.

[Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Centrally Located Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

A few study has proven that about 90% of local control rates might be benefit from stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with medically inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), it is reported SBRT associated overall survival and tumor specific survival is comparable with those treated with surgery. SBRT has been accepted as the first line treatment for inoperable patients with peripheral located stage I NSCLC. However, the role of SBRT in centrally located lesions is controversial for potential toxic effects from the adjacent anatomical structure. This paper will review the definition, indication, dose regimens, dose-volume constraints for organs at risk, radiation technology, treatment side effect of centrally located NSCLC treated with SBRT and stereotactic body proton therapy.

SUNSET: Stereotactic Radiation for Ultracentral Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer-A Safety and Efficacy Trial

BACKGROUND

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is considered a standard curative treatment for medically inoperable early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with ultracentral tumors (signifying tumors whose planning target volume touches or overlaps the central bronchial tree, esophagus, or pulmonary artery) may be at higher risk of serious toxicities such as bronchial stricture and collapse, esophageal strictures, tracheal-esophageal fistula, and hemorrhage. The primary objective of the study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose of radiotherapy for ultracentral NSCLC.

METHODS

This multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study will use a time-to-event continual reassessment method (TITE-CRM). Accrual will start at level 1 (60 Gy in 8 fractions delivered daily). The model will use all available information from previously accrued patients to assign the highest dose with a predicted risk of grade 3-5 toxicity of 30% or less. All patients with newly diagnosed stage T1-3 N0M0 NSCLC (International Union Against Cancer, 8th edition) with tumor size ≤ 6 cm and meeting the criteria for ultracentral location (ie, tumors whose planning target volume touches or overlaps the central bronchial tree, esophagus, pulmonary vein, or pulmonary artery) will be eligible for this study.

DISCUSSION

It is important to identify a safe dose-fractionation regimen for treating ultracentral tumors with SBRT. In addition, the data from this study may be informative in guiding future studies on the use of SBRT in treating malignancies within the mediastinum-for example, for salvage treatment of mediastinal lymph nodes for recurrent NSCLC or mediastinal oligometastases.

Phase 2 Study of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Stereotactic Body Proton Therapy for High-Risk, Medically Inoperable, Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

To report the feasibility of conducting a randomized study to compare the toxicity and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus stereotactic body proton therapy (SBPT) for high-risk, medically inoperable, early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with medically inoperable NSCLC with high-risk features (centrally located or <5 cm T3 tumor or isolated lung parenchymal recurrences) were randomly assigned to SBRT or SBPT. Radiation dose was 50 Gy(relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 4 12.5-Gy(RBE) fractions prescribed to the planning target volume. Stereotactic body radiation therapy was given using 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy or intensity modulated radiation therapy, and SBPT was given using passive scattering. Consistency in patient setup was ensured with on-board cone beam computed tomography for the SBRT group and with orthogonal X rays for the SBPT group.

RESULTS

The study closed early owing to poor accrual, largely because of insurance coverage and lack of volumetric imaging in the SBPT group. Ultimately, 21 patients were enrolled, and 19 patients who received 50 Gy in 4 fractions were included for analysis (9 SBRT, 10 SBPT). At a median follow-up time of 32 months, median overall survival time was 28 months in the SBRT group and not reached in the SBPT group. Three-year overall survival was 27.8% and 90%, 3-year local control was 87.5% (8 of 9) and 90.0% (9 of 10), and 3-year regional control was 47.6% (5 of 9) and 90% (9 of 10) in the SBRT and SBPT groups, respectively. One patient in the SBPT group developed grade 3 skin fibrosis. No patients experienced grade 4/5 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Poor accrual, due to lack of volumetric imaging and insurance coverage for proton therapy, led to early closure of the trial and precluded accurate assessment of efficacy and toxicity. Comparable maturity of 2 radiation therapy modalities, particularly on-board imaging, and better insurance coverage for SBPT should be considered for future studies.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy for centrally located stage I non-small cell lung cancer

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has become the standard of care for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer in high risk or medically inoperable patients. It is very well tolerated when given to peripherally located tumors and is associated with high rates of local control. Centrally located tumors represent a bigger challenge as they are closer to a number of critical structures, namely the major bronchi, esophagus, large vessels and brachial plexus, that can be damaged by the high ablative doses of SBRT needed for optimal tumor control. Thus, the fractionation schedule for centrally located tumors needs to balance the need for tumor control while minimizing the risk of significant radiotherapy toxicity. In this article, we review the current evidence, summarize the prospective and retrospective studies of SBRT for centrally located tumors, and highlight several practical considerations.

Normal Tissue Complication Probability Modeling of Pulmonary Toxicity After Stereotactic and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Central Lung Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical pulmonary and radiographic bronchial toxicity after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy and hypofractionated radiation therapy for central lung tumors, and perform normal tissue complication probability modeling and multivariable analyses to identify predictors for toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A pooled analysis was performed of patients with a central lung tumor treated using ≤12 fractions at 2 centers between 2006 and 2015. Airways were manually contoured on planning computed tomography scans, and doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction with an α/β ratio of 3. Grade ≥3 (≥G3) clinical pulmonary toxicity was evaluated by 2 or more physicians. Radiographic toxicity was defined as a stenosis or an occlusion with or without atelectasis using follow-up computed tomography scans. Logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 585 bronchial structures were studied in 195 patients who were mainly treated using 5 or 8 fractions (60%). Median patient survival was 27.9 months (95% confidence interval 22.3-33.6 months). Clinical ≥G3 toxicity was observed in 24 patients (12%) and radiographic bronchial toxicity in 55 patients (28%), both mainly manifesting ≤12 months after treatment. All analyzed dosimetric parameters correlated with clinical and lobar bronchial radiographic toxicity, with V_130Gy,EQD having the highest odds ratio. Normal tissue complication probability modeling showed a volume dependency for the development of both clinical and radiographic toxicity. On multivariate analyses, significant predictors for ≥G3 toxicity were a planning target volume overlapping the trachea or main stem bronchus (P = .005), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .034), and the total V_130Gy,EQD (P = .012). Radiographic bronchial toxicity did not significantly correlate with clinical toxicity (P = .663).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified patient and dosimetric factors associated with clinical and radiographic toxicity after high-dose radiation therapy for central lung tumors. Additional data from prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Scientific Advances in Thoracic Oncology 2016

Lung cancer care is rapidly changing with advances in genomic testing, the development of next-generation targeted kinase inhibitors, and the continued broad study of immunotherapy in new settings and potential combinations. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Journal of Thoracic Oncology publish this annual update to help readers keep pace with these important developments. Experts in thoracic cancer and care provide focused updates across multiple areas, including prevention and early detection, molecular diagnostics, pathology and staging, surgery, adjuvant therapy, radiotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, and immunotherapy for NSCLC, SCLC, and mesothelioma. Quality and value of care and perspectives on the future of lung cancer research and treatment have also been included in this concise review.

European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) recommendations for planning and delivery of high-dose, high precision radiotherapy for lung cancer

PURPOSE

To update literature-based recommendations for techniques used in high-precision thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer, in both routine practice and clinical trials.

METHODS

A literature search was performed to identify published articles that were considered clinically relevant and practical to use. Recommendations were categorised under the following headings: patient positioning and immobilisation, Tumour and nodal changes, CT and FDG-PET imaging, target volumes definition, radiotherapy treatment planning and treatment delivery. An adapted grading of evidence from the Infectious Disease Society of America, and for models the TRIPOD criteria, were used.

RESULTS

Recommendations were identified for each of the above categories.

CONCLUSION

Recommendations for the clinical implementation of high-precision conformal radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumours were identified from the literature. Techniques that were considered investigational at present are highlighted.

High Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy is a Safe and Feasible Treatment for Central Lung Cancer

Background

There have been few reports about high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The aim of this study was to examine retrospectively the safety and efficacy of high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer.

Patients and methods

Patients treated by proton beam therapy for central lung cancer located less than 2 cm from the trachea, mainstem bronchus, or lobe bronchus were included in this study. All patients received 80 Gy of relative biological dose effectiveness (RBE) in 25 fractions with proton beam therapy over 5 weeks between January 2009 and February 2015. The toxicities were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria.

Results

Twenty patients, including 14 clinically inoperable patients (70%), received proton beam therapy for central lung cancer. The median patient age was 75 years (range: 63–90 years), the median follow up time was 27.5 months (range: 12–72 months), and the median tumor diameter was 39.5 mm (range: 24–81 mm). All patients were followed for at least 20 months or until death. The 2-year overall survival rate was 73.8% (100% in operable patients, and 62.5% in inoperable patients), and the 2-year local control rate was 78.5%. There was no Grade 3 or higher toxicities, including bronchial stricture, obstruction, and fistula.

Conclusions

The present study suggests that a high total dose hypofractionated proton beam therapy for central lung cancer was safe and feasible.

Phase I study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (JROSG10-1)

BACKGROUND

To investigate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Five dose levels, ranging from of 52 to 68 Gy in eight fractions, were determined; the treatment protocol began at 60 Gy (level 3). Each dose level included 10 patients. Levels 1-2 were indicated if more than four patients exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which was defined as an occurrence of a grade 3 (or worse) adverse effect within 12 months after SBRT initiation. MTD was defined as the lowest dose level at which more than four patients exhibited DLT.

RESULTS

Ten patients were enrolled in the level 3 study. One patient was considered unsuitable because of severe emphysema. Therefore, nine patients were evaluated and no patient exhibited DLT. The level 3 results indicated that we should proceed to level 4 (64 Gy). However, due to the difficulty involved in meeting the dose constraints, further dose escalation was not feasible and the MTD was found to be 60 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD of SBRT for centrally located stage IA NSCLC was 60 Gy in eight fractions.

Use of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Measuring More Than 5 cm

INTRODUCTION

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is currently not the guideline-recommended treatment for lung tumors measuring more than 5 cm. However, improvements in radiotherapy techniques have led to increasing use of SABR for larger tumors.

METHODS

We analyzed the clinical outcomes in patients with a primary or recurrent NSCLC measuring more than 5 cm and treated with five or eight fractions of SABR at our center. Patients who had prior thoracic radiotherapy were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 63 consecutive patients with a median tumor diameter of 5.8 cm (range 5.1-10.4) were identified; 81% had T2N0 disease and 18% had T3N0 disease. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 2 (range 0-6). After a median follow-up of 54.7 months, median survival was 28.3 months. Disease-free survival at 2 years was 82.1%, and the local, regional, and distant control rates at 2 years were 95.8%, 93.7%, and 83.6%, respectively. An out-of-field distant recurrence at one or more sites was the most common pattern of failure (10%). Grade 3 or higher toxicity was recorded in 30% of patients, with radiation pneumonitis being the most common toxicity (19%). A likely (n = 4) or possible (n = 8) treatment-related death was scored in 19% of patients. There was preexisting interstitial lung disease in eight patients (13%), with fatal toxicity developing in five of them (63%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lung SABR in tumors larger than 5 cm resulted in high local control rates and acceptable survival outcomes in a patient population with appreciable comorbidity. Patients with interstitial lung disease should be considered a very high-risk population for SABR.

A systematic review of outcomes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) describes a radiotherapy (RT) technique where high doses of radiation are precisely delivered to an extracranial target within the body, using either a single fraction of RT or using multiple small numbers of fractions. SABR has now become the standard of care treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for whom surgery is not appropriate. This systematic review considers the evidence supporting the use of SABR in early-stage NSCLC, reported toxicity rates, the use of SABR in centrally located NSCLC, the use of SABR as salvage therapy following surgery or RT, and future potential drug combinations with SABR.

Phase I study of stereotactic body radiation therapy for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (JCOG0702): Results for the group with PTV⩾100cc

PURPOSE

A dose escalation study to determine the recommended dose (RD) with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for peripheral T2N0M0 non-small cell carcinomas (NSCLC) was conducted. The results of the group with PTV⩾100cc are reported in this paper.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The continual reassessment method (CRM) was used to determine the dose level that patients should be assigned to and to estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was Grade 3 or higher radiation pneumonitis (RP), and Grade 2 or higher RP was used as a surrogate DLT. The RD was equal to the MTD. The dose was prescribed at D₉₅ of the PTV.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were accrued. More patients should have been enrolled but we decided not to prolong the study period. No patients experienced Grade 3 RP. Two patients experienced Grade 2 RP at 50Gy in 4 fractions. The predicted MTD was 50.2Gy. The posterior probability of the Grade 2 RP frequency over 40% was 5.3% for the dose level of 50Gy. The RD was determined to be 50Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

The RD was determined to be 50Gy in 4 fractions in this population.

SBRT for centrally localized NSCLC - What is too central?

Purpose

Current guidelines recommend stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in medically inoperable patients. There are excellent outcome and toxicity data for SBRT of peripheral lung tumors. However, the discussion on SBRT for centrally located tumors is controversial. This study evaluated current clinical practice regarding SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, to identify common fractionation schedules and commonly accepted contraindications for SBRT.

Methods

A questionnaire consisting of two parts was introduced at the annual meeting of the DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, representing centers in Germany and Switzerland. The first part of the questionnaire covered general information about the centers, whereas the second part specifically addressed SBRT of centrally located lung tumors, using case examples of nine primary NSCLC patients. Reconstructions of a contrast enhanced CT, as well as PET-Imaging for each case were demonstrated to the participants.

Results

Twenty-six centers participated in the meeting. The majority was academic (73%), participated in interdisciplinary thoracic oncology tumorboards (88%) and offered SBRT for lung tumors (96%). Two centers questioned the indication of SBRT for central lung tumors because of lack of evidence. The majority of centers had experience in SBRT for central lung tumors (88%) and half of the centers reported more than ten cases treated during a median period of five years. Most fractionation schedules used PTV encompassing doses of 48–60 Gy in eight fractions with maximum doses of 125–150%.

A clear indication for SBRT treatment was seen by more than 85% of centers in three of the nine patients in whom tumors were small and not closer than 2 cm to the main bronchus. Prior pneumonectomy or immediate adjacency to hilar/mediastinal structures were not considered as contraindications for SBRT. In cases where the tumor exceeded 4 cm in diameter or was located closer than 4 cm to the carina 50–80% of centers saw an indication for SBRT. One case, with a 7 cm tumor reaching to the carina would have been treated with SBRT only by one center.

Conclusion

Within DEGRO working group on stereotactic radiotherapy, SBRT for small (<4 cm) early stage NSCLC is a common indication, if the minimal distance to the main bronchi is at least 2 cm. The controversy on the treatment of larger and more central tumors will hopefully be solved by ongoing prospective clinical trials.

Specific toxicity after stereotactic body radiation therapy to the central chest : A comprehensive review

The toxicity of stereotactic body radiation therapy in the central chest remains an unsettled issue. The collected data concerning the observed complications are poorly understood and are limited in their quantity and quality, thus hampering a precise delineation of treatment-specific toxicity. The majority of complications scored as toxicity grade 5, namely respiratory failure and fatal hemoptysis, are most likely related to multiple competing risks and occurred at different dose fractionation schemas, e. g., 10-12 fractions of 4-5 Gy, 5 fractions of 10 Gy, 3 fractions of 20-22 Gy, and 1 fraction of 15-30 Gy. Further investigations with longer follow-up and more details of patients' pretreatment and tumor characteristics are required. Furthermore, satisfactory documentation of complications and details of dosimetric parameters, as well as limitation of the wide range of possible fractionation schemes is also warranted for a better understanding of the risk factors relevant for macroscopic damage to the serially organized anatomic structure within the central chest.

A critical review of recent developments in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality, and radiotherapy plays a key role in both curative and palliative treatments for this disease. Recent advances include stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), which is now established as a curative-intent treatment option for patients with peripheral early-stage NSCLC who are medically inoperable, or at high risk for surgical complications. Improved delivery techniques have facilitated studies evaluating the role of SABR in oligometastatic NSCLC, and encouraged the use of high-technology radiotherapy in some palliative settings. Although outcomes in locally advanced NSCLC remain disappointing for many patients, future progress may come about from an improved understanding of disease biology and the development of radiotherapy approaches that further reduce normal tissue irradiation. At the moment, the benefits, if any, of radiotherapy technologies such as proton beam therapy remain unproven. This paper provides a critical review of selected aspects of modern radiotherapy for lung cancer, highlights the current limitations in our understanding and treatment approaches, and discuss future treatment strategies for NSCLC.