1
|
Mangesius J, Seppi T, Arnold CR, Mangesius S, Kerschbaumer J, Demetz M, Minasch D, Vorbach SM, Sarcletti M, Lukas P, Nevinny-Stickel M, Ganswindt U. Prognosis versus Actual Outcomes in Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastases: Reliability of Common Prognostic Parameters and Indices. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:1739-1751. [PMID: 38668035 PMCID: PMC11049204 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcome of stereotactic radiosurgery as the sole treatment for brain metastases and to assess prognostic factors influencing survival. A total of 108 consecutive patients with 213 metastases were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment was determined with close-meshed MRI follow-up. Various prognostic factors were assessed, and several prognostic indices were compared regarding their reliability to estimate overall survival. Median overall survival was 15 months; one-year overall survival was 50.5%. Both one- and two-year local controls were 90.9%. The rate of new metastases after SRS was 49.1%. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the presence of extracranial metastases, male sex, lower KPI, and progressive extracranial disease were significant risk factors for decreased survival. Of all evaluated prognostic indices, the Basic Score for Brain Metastases (BSBMs) showed the best correlation with overall survival. A substantial survival advantage was found for female patients after SRS when compared to male patients (18 versus 9 months, p = 0.003). SRS of brain metastasis is a safe and effective treatment option when frequent monitoring for new metastases with MRI is performed. Common prognostic scores lack reliable estimation of survival times. Female sex should be considered as an additional independent positive prognostic factor influencing survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Mangesius
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Thomas Seppi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Stephanie Mangesius
- Department of Neuroradiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Johannes Kerschbaumer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Matthias Demetz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Danijela Minasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Samuel Moritz Vorbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Manuel Sarcletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Lukas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Ute Ganswindt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Acker G, Nachbar M, Soffried N, Bodnar B, Janas A, Krantchev K, Kalinauskaite G, Kluge A, Shultz D, Conti A, Kaul D, Zips D, Vajkoczy P, Senger C. What if: A retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1056330. [PMID: 37007157 PMCID: PMC10062706 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (NaSRS) of brain metastases has gained importance, but it is not routinely performed. While awaiting the results of prospective studies, we aimed to analyze the changes in the volume of brain metastases irradiated pre- and postoperatively and the resulting dosimetric effects on normal brain tissue (NBT). Methods We identified patients treated with SRS at our institution to compare hypothetical preoperative gross tumor and planning target volumes (pre-GTV and pre-PTV) with original postoperative resection cavity volumes (post-GTV and post-PTV) as well as with a standardized-hypothetical PTV with 2.0 mm margin. We used Pearson correlation to assess the association between the GTV and PTV changes with the pre-GTV. A multiple linear regression analysis was established to predict the GTV change. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases was created to assess the volume effect on the NBT exposure. We performed a literature review on NaSRS and searched for ongoing prospective trials. Results We included 30 patients in the analysis. The pre-/post-GTV and pre-/post-PTV did not differ significantly. We observed a negative correlation between pre-GTV and GTV-change, which was also a predictor of volume change in the regression analysis, in terms of a larger volume change for a smaller pre-GTV. In total, 62.5% of cases with an enlargement greater than 5.0 cm3 were smaller tumors (pre-GTV < 15.0 cm3), whereas larger tumors greater than 25.0 cm3 showed only a decrease in post-GTV. Hypothetical planning for the selected cases to evaluate the volume effect resulted in a median NBT exposure of only 67.6% (range: 33.2-84.5%) relative to the dose received by the NBT in the postoperative SRS setting. Nine published studies and twenty ongoing studies are listed as an overview. Conclusion Patients with smaller brain metastases may have a higher risk of volume increase when irradiated postoperatively. Target volume delineation is of great importance because the PTV directly affects the exposure of NBT, but it is a challenge when contouring resection cavities. Further studies should identify patients at risk of relevant volume increase to be preferably treated with NaSRS in routine practice. Ongoing clinical trials will evaluate additional benefits of NaSRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Academy, Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcel Nachbar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Nina Soffried
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Bohdan Bodnar
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anastasia Janas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Kiril Krantchev
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - David Shultz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - David Kaul
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chang S, Liu G, Zhao L, Zheng W, Yan D, Chen P, Li X, Yang K, Deraniyagala R, Stevens C, Grills I, Chinnaiyan P, Li X, Ding X. Redefine the Role of Spot-Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for the Single Brain Metastasis Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Front Oncol 2022; 12:804036. [PMID: 35664795 PMCID: PMC9160604 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.804036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore the role of using Pencil Beam Scanning (PBS) proton beam therapy in single lesion brain stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), we developed and validated a dosimetric in silico model to assist in the selection of an optimal treatment approach among the conventional Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IMPT) and Spot-scanning Proton Arc (SPArc). Material and Methods A patient’s head CT data set was used as an in silico model. A series of targets (volume range from 0.3 cc to 33.03 cc) were inserted in the deep central and peripheral region, simulating targets with different sizes and locations. Three planning groups: IMPT, VMAT, and SPArc were created for dosimetric comparison purposes and a decision tree was built based on this in silico model. Nine patients with single brain metastases were retrospectively selected for validation. Multiple dosimetric metrics were analyzed to assess the plan quality, such as dose Conformity Index (CI) (ratio of the target volume to 100% prescription isodose volume); R50 (ratio of 50% prescription isodose volume to the target volume); V12Gy (volume of brain tissue minus GTV receiving 12 Gy), and mean dose of the normal brain. Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of brain radionecrosis (RN) was calculated using the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) model and total treatment delivery time was calculated. Six physicians from different institutions participated in the blind survey to evaluate the plan quality and rank their choices. Results The study showed that SPArc has a dosimetric advantage in the V12Gy and R50 with target volumes > 9.00 cc compared to VMAT and IMPT. A significant clinical benefit can be found in deep centrally located lesions larger than 20.00 cc using SPArc because of the superior dose conformity and mean dose reduction in healthy brain tissue. Nine retrospective clinical cases and the blind survey showed good agreement with the in silico dosimetric model and decision tree. Additionally, SPArc significantly reduced the treatment delivery time compared to VMAT (SPArc 184.46 ± 59.51s vs. VMAT: 1574.78 ± 213.65s). Conclusion The study demonstrated the feasibility of using Proton beam therapy for single brain metastasis patients utilizing the SPArc technique. At the current stage of technological development, VMAT remains the current standard modality of choice for single lesion brain SRS. The in silico dosimetric model and decision tree presented here could be used as a practical clinical decision tool to assist the selection of the optimal treatment modality among VMAT, IMPT, and SPArc in centers that have both photon and proton capabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Weili Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Di Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Xiangpan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Kunyu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Rohan Deraniyagala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Craig Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Inga Grills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Prakash Chinnaiyan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, United States
- *Correspondence: Xuanfeng Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rogers S, Stauffer A, Lomax N, Alonso S, Eberle B, Gomez Ordoñez S, Lazeroms T, Kessler E, Brendel M, Schwyzer L, Riesterer O. Five fraction stereotactic radiotherapy after brain metastasectomy: a single-institution experience and literature review. J Neurooncol 2021; 155:35-43. [PMID: 34546498 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03840-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The outcomes of five fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (hfSRT) following brain metastasectomy were evaluated and compared with published series. METHODS 30 Gy in 5 fractions HfSRT prescribed to the surgical cavity was reduced to 25 Gy if the volume of 'brain-GTV' receiving 20 Gy exceeded 20 cm3. Endpoints were local recurrence, nodular leptomeningeal recurrence, new brain metastases and radionecrosis. The literature was searched for reports of clinical and dosimetric outcomes following postoperative hfSRT in 3-5 fractions. RESULTS 39 patients with 40 surgical cavities were analyzed. Cavity local control rate at 1 year was 33/40 (82.5%). 3 local failures followed 30 Gy/5 fractions and 4 with 25 Gy/5 fractions. The incidence of leptomeningeal disease (LMD) was 7/40 (17.5%). No grade 3-4 toxicities, particularly no radionecrosis, were reported. The incidence of distant brain metastases was 15/40 (37.5%). The median overall survival was 15 months. Across 13 published series, the weighted mean local control was 83.1% (adjusted for sample size), the mean incidence of LMD was 14.9% (7-34%) and the mean rate of radionecrosis was 10.3% (0-20.6%). CONCLUSION Postoperative hfSRT can be delivered with 25-30 Gy in 5 fractions with efficacy in excess of 82% and no significant toxicity when the dose to 'brain-GTV' does not exceed 20 cm3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rogers
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
| | - A Stauffer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - N Lomax
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - S Alonso
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - B Eberle
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - S Gomez Ordoñez
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - T Lazeroms
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - E Kessler
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - M Brendel
- Department of Neuroradiology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - L Schwyzer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - O Riesterer
- Radiation Oncology Center KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstrasse 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Camargo AV, Cao M, da Silva DDCSA, de Araújo RLC. Evaluation of the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters of radiosurgery planning for multiple brain metastases. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:83-92. [PMID: 34212482 PMCID: PMC8364278 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the correlation between dosimetric, geometric, and technical parameters for radiosurgery planning of multiple brain metastasis treatments treated with a linear accelerator with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Materials and methods Data were collected retrospectively from 55 patients who underwent radiosurgery in a single institution from August 2017 to February 2020. Patients presented 4–21 brain metastases were treated with a single fraction with doses between 18 and 20 Gy. Dosimetric variables were collected including V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), maximum dose (Dmax), and the CI_R50. Geometric variables including the number of lesions, target volumes, the smallest target volume, the largest target volume, and the distance between the isocenter and the most distant lesion (DIL) and technical variables such as the numbers of total arcs, noncoplanar arcs, and isocenters were collected for analysis. Results The number of lesions had a moderate positive correlation with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, HI, Dmax, and with the number of total arcs. The target volumes had a positive medium–high correlation with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, and moderate positive correlation with HI, Dmax, number of arcs and noncoplanar arcs. The CI and CI_R50 had a negative correlation with all volumes related to the target: the target volumes, the smallest, and the largest lesion. A positive correlation was observed between the distance of the isocenter and the most DIL with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy, V14Gy, HI, Dmax, and the number of isocenters. Conclusion It was found that the number of lesions and the target volumes are good predictors of dosimetric indexes of plan evaluation and that the distance between the isocenter and the most DIL harms them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Raphael Leonardo Cunha de Araújo
- Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Brazil.,Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.,Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Desai DD, Cordrey IL, Johnson EL. Efficient optimization of R50% when planning multiple cranial metastases simultaneously in single isocenter SRS/SRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:71-82. [PMID: 33960619 PMCID: PMC8200517 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simultaneous optimization of multiple Planning Target Volumes (PTVs) of varying size and location in the cranium is a non-trivial task. The rate of dose falloff around PTV structures is variable and depends on PTV characteristics such as the volume. The metric R50% is one parameter that can be used to quantify dose falloff achieved in a given treatment plan. An important treatment planning question is how to construct optimization conditions that result in the efficient production of acceptable plan outcomes considering metrics such as R50%. Guidance provided in literature suggests generating multiple shell control structures around each PTV. The constraints applied to these shells can vary significantly depending on PTV volume. Additionally, there is no clear guidance on how to prospectively determine objective constraints for the optimization shells to achieve a specified goal of R50%. Based on physical principles and empirical evidence, we provide clear quantitative guidance on how to translate the desired R50% outcome into appropriately sized optimization structures around PTVs via an equation that depends on a desired goal for R50% and the volume of PTV. Optimization schema are also provided that allow the goal R50% to be approached or achieved for all PTVs individually. We demonstrate the application of the methodology using commercially available treatment planning software and radiotherapy treatment equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharmin D Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Ivan L Cordrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - E L Johnson
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Spaniol M, Mai S, Zakrzewski T, Ehmann M, Stieler F. Inverse planning in Gamma Knife radiosurgery: A comparative planning study. Phys Med 2021; 82:269-278. [PMID: 33706117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the advantages of inverse planning using a prerelease version of Leksell Gamma Knife® (LGK) Lightning (Elekta AB, Sweden) compared to manual forward planning. METHODS Thirty-eight patients with metastases (MET, n = 15), vestibular schwannomas (VS, n = 11) and meningiomas (MEN, n = 12), treated with LGK Icon™ at our institution, were analyzed retrospectively. For each case, an inverse (inv) and inverse full coverage (fc) treatment plan was generated using LGK Lightning and compared to the clinical plans. Several dosimetry and efficiency characteristics were compared for each indication. The mean, median difference and interquartile range were reported and the significance was assessed with a paired-sample Wilcoxon test (significance level < 0.05). Further, the inter operator variability was analyzed for multiple users. RESULTS Inv and fc treatment plans show improved target coverage (up to 3.6%) for all analyzed paradigms. For inv plans, the selectivity is enhanced (MET: 2.9%; VS: 1.8%; MEN: 1%) and the organ at risk doses are significantly reduced (VS: up to 4.5%; MEN: up to 17.5%). For inv and fc plans, the beam on time (BOT) is shortened (MET: up to 7.9%; benign tumors: 49.5%). The inter operator variability analysis shows similar treatment plan quality with small differences in plan efficiency (difference in BOT: 1-3.3 min). CONCLUSIONS LGK Lightning allows to generate improved LGK treatment plans regarding plan quality with reduced BOT compared to manual forward plans. The inter operator variability showed that multiple users with different experiences can generate similar treatment plan quality using LGK Lightning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Spaniol
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Sabine Mai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Tonja Zakrzewski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Michael Ehmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Florian Stieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daisne JF, De Ketelaere C, Jamart J. The individual risk of symptomatic radionecrosis after brain metastasis radiosurgery is predicted by a continuous function of the V12Gy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:70-74. [PMID: 33532633 PMCID: PMC7829108 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Brain metastases are frequently treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Radionecrosis (RN) is the late side effect in up to 24% of patients, being symptomatic in 8-10%. Fixed values of the radiosurgical volume receiving 12 Gy or more (V12Gy) are used to roughly predict the global risk. The aim of this retrospective study is to fine-tune the model of individual risk prediction for symptomatic radionecrosis and identify modulating factors. Materials and methods Data of patients treated with SRS for ≤3 BM of solid tumours at CHU-UCL-Namur were retrospectively reviewed. Doses ranging from 15 to 24 Gy were prescribed to the 70% isodose in function of the lesion diameter. Treatment was administered with a stereotactic linear accelerator. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was performed 3-monthly for 18 months and 6-monthly thereafter. RN was prospectively diagnosed and confirmed by the tumour board. V12Gy, previous or salvage whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), smoking history, diabetes, postoperative SRS, diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score, cerebral lobe location and relative location (superficial versus deep) were retrieved. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess their predictive values and derive a model. Results 128 patients with 220 lesions were analysed. The risk of RN was predicted by a continuous function of the V12Gy (p = 0.005). No other factor had a significant impact, particularly WBRT that did not increase the risk. Conclusion The risk of symptomatic RN is predicted on an individual basis by a model in function of the V12Gy and must be confirmed in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-François Daisne
- Radiation Oncology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU-UCL-Namur (site Ste-Elisabeth), 5000 Namur, Belgium.,Radiation Oncology Department, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - University of Leuven, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Clémentine De Ketelaere
- Radiation Oncology Department, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU-UCL-Namur (site Ste-Elisabeth), 5000 Namur, Belgium
| | - Jacques Jamart
- Unité de Support Scientifique, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU-UCL-Namur (site Godinne), 5530 Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Desai DD, Johnson EL, Cordrey IL. An analytical expression for R50% dependent on PTV surface area and volume: A cranial SRS comparison. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2021; 22:203-210. [PMID: 33493385 PMCID: PMC7882107 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Revised: 12/19/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The intermediate dose spill for a stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plan can be quantified with the metric R50%, defined as the 50% isodose cloud volume (VIDC50% ) divided by the volume of the planning target volume (PTV). By coupling sound physical principles with the basic definition of R50%, we derive an analytical expression for R50% for a spherical PTV. Our analytical expression depends on three quantities: the surface area of PTV (SAPTV ), the volume of PTV (VPTV ), and the distance of dose drop-off to 50% (Δr). The value of ∆r was obtained from a simple set of cranial phantom plan calculations. We generate values from our analytical expression for R50% (R50%Analytic ) and compare the values to clinical R50% values (R50%Clinical ) extracted from a previously published SRS data set that spans the VPTV range from 0.15 to 50.1 cm3 . R50%Analytic is smaller than R50%Clinical in all cases by an average of 15% ± 7%, and the general trend of R50%Clinical vs VPTV is reflected in the same trend of R50%Analytic . This comparison suggests that R50%Analytic could represent a theoretical lower limit for the clinical SRS data; further investigation is required to confirm this. R50%Analytic could provide useful guidance for what might be achievable in SRS planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dharmin D Desai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - E L Johnson
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Ivan L Cordrey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHI Memorial Hospital, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Shafie RA, Tonndorf-Martini E, Schmitt D, Celik A, Weber D, Lang K, König L, Höne S, Forster T, von Nettelbladt B, Adeberg S, Debus J, Rieken S, Bernhardt D. Single-Isocenter Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy vs. CyberKnife M6 for the Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Multiple Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2020; 10:568. [PMID: 32457829 PMCID: PMC7225280 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is becoming more frequently used for patients with multiple brain metastases (BMs). Single-isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (SI-VMAT) is an emerging alternative to dedicated systems such as CyberKnife (CK). We present a dosimetric comparison between CyberKnife M6 and SI-VMAT, planned at RayStation V8B, for the simultaneous SRS of five or more BM. Patients and Methods: Twenty treatment plans of CK-based single-session SRS to ≥5 brain metastases were replanned using SI-VMAT for delivery at an Elekta VersaHD linear accelerator. Prescription dose was 20 or 18 Gy, conformally enclosing at least 98% of the total planning target volume (PTV), with PTV margin-width adapted to the respective SRS technique. Comparatively analyzed quality metrics included dose distribution to the healthy brain (HB), including different isodose volumes, conformity, and gradient indices. Estimated treatment time was also compared. Results: Median HB isodose volumes for 3, 5, 8, 10, and 12 Gy were consistently smaller for CK-SRS compared to SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). Dose falloff outside the target volume, as expressed by the gradient indices GI_high and GI_low, was consistently steeper for CK-SRS compared to SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). CK-SRS achieved a median GI_high of 3.1 [interquartile range (IQR), 2.9–1.3] vs. 5.0 (IQR 4.3–5.5) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). For GI_low, the results were 3.0 (IQR, 2.9–3.1) for CK-SRS vs. 5.6 (IQR, 4.3–5.5) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). The median conformity index (CI) was 1.2 (IQR, 1.1–1.2) for CK-SRS vs. 1.5 (IQR, 1.4–1.7) for SI-VMAT (p < 0.001). Estimated treatment time was shorter for SI-VMAT, yielding a median of 13.7 min (IQR, 13.5–14.0) compared to 130 min (IQR, 114.5–154.5) for CK-SRS (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SI-VMAT offers enhanced treatment efficiency in cases with multiple BM, as compared to CyberKnife, but requires compromise regarding conformity and integral dose to the healthy brain. Additionally, delivery at a conventional linear accelerator (linac) may require a larger PTV margin to account for delivery and setup errors. Further evaluations are warranted to determine whether the detected dosimetric differences are clinically relevant. SI-VMAT could be a reasonable alternative to a dedicated radiosurgery system for selected patients with multiple BM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rami A El Shafie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Tonndorf-Martini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniela Schmitt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aylin Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dorothea Weber
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics (IMBI), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Höne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bastian von Nettelbladt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology (E050), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goldbaum DS, Hurley JD, Hamilton RJ. A simple knowledge-based tool for stereotactic radiosurgery pre-planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:97-108. [PMID: 31743563 PMCID: PMC6909177 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We studied the dosimetry of single‐isocenter treatment plans generated to treat a solitary intracranial lesion using linac‐based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). A common metric for evaluating SRS plan quality is the volume of normal brain tissue irradiated by a dose of at least 12 Gy (V12), which is important because multiple studies have shown a strong correlation between V12 and incidence of radiation necrosis. Unrealistic expectations for values of V12 can lead to wasted planning time. We present a model that estimates V12 without having to construct a full treatment plan. This model was derived by retrospectively analyzing 50 SRS treatment plans, each clinically approved for delivery using circular collimator cone arc therapy (CAT). Each case was re‐planned for delivery via dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT), and then scaling arguments were used to extend dosimetric data to account for different prescription dose (PD) values (15, 18, 21, or 24 Gy). We determined a phenomenological expression for the total volume receiving at least 12 Gy (TV12) as a function of both planning target volume (PTV) and PD: TV12/1cc=n∗PD/1Gy+d∗PTV/1cca∗PD/1Gyc, where a,c,n,d are fit parameters, and a separate set of values is determined for each plan type. In addition, we generated a sequence of plots to clarify how the relationship between conformity index (CI) and TV12 depends on plan type (CAT vs DCAT), PTV, and PD. These results can be used to suggest realistic plan parameters and planning goals before the start of treatment planning. In the absence of access to more sophisticated pre‐planning tools, this model can be locally generated and implemented at relatively low cost with respect to time, money, and expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Goldbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Justin D Hurley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Russell J Hamilton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bronnimann C, Huchet A, Benech-Faure J, Dutriaux C, Saut O, Blais E, Mollier O, Trouette R, Vendrely V. Interval between planning and frameless stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: are our margins still accurate? Neurooncol Pract 2019; 7:211-217. [PMID: 32626589 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Advances in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) have led to dramatically reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins. However, tumor growth between planning and treatment may lead to treatment failure. Our purpose was to assess the kinetics of tumor growth before SRS for brain metastases. Methods This retrospective, monocentric study included all consecutive patients (pts) treated for brain metastases secondary to melanoma (ML) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between June 2015 and May 2016. All pts underwent diagnostic brain imaging and a radiosurgery planning MRI, during which gross tumor volume (GTV) was delineated. Linear and exponential models were used to extrapolate a theoretical GTV at first day of treatment, and theoretical time to outgrow the PTV margins. Results Twenty-three ML and 31 NSCLC brain metastases (42 pts, 84 brain imaging scans) were analyzed. Comparison of GTV at diagnosis and planning showed increased tumor volume for 20 ML pts (96%) and 22 NSCLC pts (71%). The shortest time to outgrow a 1 mm margin was 6 days and 3 days for ML and 14 and 8 days for NSCLC with linear and exponential models, respectively. Conclusions Physicians should bear in mind the interval between SRS planning and treatment. A mathematical model could screen rapidly progressing tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Caroline Dutriaux
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU)-Bordeaux, Oncology Department, France
| | | | | | | | | | - Veronique Vendrely
- CHU-Bordeaux, Radiotherapy Department, France.,INRIA Bordeaux Sud-Ouest, France.,CHU-Bordeaux, Neurosurgery Department, France.,University of Bordeaux, INSERM U1035, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hofmaier J, Bodensohn R, Garny S, Hadi I, Fleischmann DF, Eder M, Dinc Y, Reiner M, Corradini S, Parodi K, Belka C, Niyazi M. Single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases: dosimetric comparison of VMAT and a dedicated DCAT planning tool. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:103. [PMID: 31186023 PMCID: PMC6560766 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In this dosimetric study, a dedicated planning tool for single isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) was compared to standard volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods Twenty patients with a total of 66 lesions who were treated with the DCAT tool were included in this study. Single fraction doses of 15–20 Gy were prescribed to each lesion. Patients were re-planned using non-coplanar VMAT. Number of monitor units as well as V4Gy, V5Gy and V8Gy were extracted for every plan. Using a density-based clustering algorithm, V10Gy and V12Gy and the volume receiving half of the prescribed dose were extracted for every lesion. Gradient indices and conformity indices were calculated. The correlation of the target sphericity, a measure of how closely the shape of the target PTV resembles a sphere, to the difference in V10Gy and V12Gy between the two techniques was assessed using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Results The automated DCAT planning tool performed significantly better in terms of all investigated metrics (p < 0.05), in particular healthy brain sparing (V10Gy: median 3.2 cm3 vs. 4.9 cm3), gradient indices (median 5.99 vs. 7.17) and number of monitor units (median 4569 vs. 5840 MU). Differences in conformity indices were minimal (median 0.75 vs. 0.73) but still significant (p < 0.05). A moderate correlation between PTV sphericity and the difference of V10Gy and V12Gy between the two techniques was found (Spearman’s rho = 0.27 and 0.30 for V10Gy and V12Gy, respectively, p < 0.05). Conclusions The dedicated DCAT planning tool performed better than VMAT in terms of healthy brain sparing and treatment efficiency, in particular for nearly spherical lesions. In contrast, VMAT can be superior in cases with irregularly shaped lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Hofmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany.
| | - Raphael Bodensohn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Sylvia Garny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Indrawati Hadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Daniel F Fleischmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Eder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Yavuz Dinc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Michael Reiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, DE, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee YC, Kim Y. Circular collimator arc versus dynamic conformal arc treatment planning for linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery of an intracranial small single lesion: a perspective of lesion asymmetry. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:91. [PMID: 31159835 PMCID: PMC6545737 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1307-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although circular collimator arcs (CCA) and dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) are commonly used linear accelerator-based treatment planning techniques for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of a small single lesion, these two techniques have not been rigorously compared in terms of tumor shape. Therefore, this study compared clinical CCA plans with re-planned DCA plans using conformity index (CI) and V12Gy (volume of normal brain tissue receiving 12 Gy or higher) from a perspective of asymmetry (Asym) of planning target volume (PTV). METHODS Ninety-five clinical CCA plans delivered for a small single lesion with PTV size < 1.4 cm3 were selected and re-planned using DCA. PTV Asym (%) was defined and calculated from three dimensions of PTV. A pair of the 95 plans was first considered as one group without grouping and then categorized into two groups with respective to either PTV size or PTV Asym, and four groups with respect to PTV size and PTV Asym. For grouping, median values of PTV size and PTV Asym were used. A non-parametric paired test was performed for CI and V12Gy to compare CCA and DCA plans in each group. RESULTS Median values of PTV size and PTV Asym were 0.415 cm3 (range: 0.076 cm3-1.369 cm3) and 6.12% (range: 0.52-25.74%), respectively. DCA plans had a lower average CI value than CCA plans for all groups. CCA plans had a smaller average V12Gy value than DCA plans for lesions with PTV Asym ≤6.12%, while CCA and DCA plans had similar average V12Gy values for lesions with PTV Asym > 6.12%. CONCLUSIONS The DCA technique is recommended when a lesion has PTV Asym > 6.12% regardless of PTV size. For lesions with PTV Asym ≤6.12%, a technique choice would depend on the preference of CI or V12Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongsook C Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona, Banner University Medicine North Building #2, 3838 N Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA
| | - Yongbok Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona, Banner University Medicine North Building #2, 3838 N Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Loganadane G, Dhermain F, Louvel G, Kauv P, Deutsch E, Le Péchoux C, Levy A. Brain Radiation Necrosis: Current Management With a Focus on Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2018; 8:336. [PMID: 30234011 PMCID: PMC6134016 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
As the prognosis of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is constantly improving with advances in systemic therapies (immune checkpoint blockers and new generation of targeted molecular compounds), more attention should be paid to the diagnosis and management of treatments-related long-term secondary effects. Brain metastases (BM) occur frequently in the natural history of NSCLC and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is one of the main efficient local non-invasive therapeutic methods. However, SRT may have some disabling side effects. Brain radiation necrosis (RN) represents one of the main limiting toxicities, generally occurring from 6 months to several years after treatment. The diagnosis of RN itself may be quite challenging, as conventional imaging is frequently not able to differentiate RN from BM recurrence. Retrospective studies have suggested increased incidence rates of RN in NSCLC patients with oncogenic driver mutations [epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive] or receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The risk of immune checkpoint inhibitors in contributing to RN remains controversial. Treatment modalities for RN have not been prospectively compared. Those include surveillance, corticosteroids, bevacizumab and local interventions (minimally invasive laser interstitial thermal ablation or surgery). The aim of this review is to describe and discuss possible RN management options in the light of the newly available literature, with a particular focus on NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frédéric Dhermain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Guillaume Louvel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Paul Kauv
- Department of Neuroradiology, AP-HP, CHU Henri Mondor, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Cécile Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dosimetric analysis of Tomotherapy-based intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery of brain metastasis. Phys Med 2018; 52:48-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.06.632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
17
|
Improved effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery in large brain metastases by individualized isotoxic dose prescription: an in silico study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 194:560-569. [PMID: 29349605 PMCID: PMC5959984 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1262-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2017] [Accepted: 01/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In large brain metastases (BM) with a diameter of more than 2 cm there is an increased risk of radionecrosis (RN) with standard stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) dose prescription, while the normal tissue constraint is exceeded. The tumor control probability (TCP) with a single dose of 15 Gy is only 42%. This in silico study tests the hypothesis that isotoxic dose prescription (IDP) can increase the therapeutic ratio (TCP/Risk of RN) of SRS in large BM. MATERIALS AND METHODS A treatment-planning study with 8 perfectly spherical and 46 clinically realistic gross tumor volumes (GTV) was conducted. The effects of GTV size (0.5-4 cm diameter), set-up margins (0, 1, and 2 mm), and beam arrangements (coplanar vs non-coplanar) on the predicted TCP using IDP were assessed. For single-, three-, and five-fraction IDP dose-volume constraints of V12Gy = 10 cm3, V19.2 Gy = 10 cm3, and a V20Gy = 20 cm3, respectively, were used to maintain a low risk of radionecrosis. RESULTS In BM of 4 cm in diameter, the maximum achievable single-fraction IDP dose was 14 Gy compared to 15 Gy for standard SRS dose prescription, with respective TCPs of 32 and 42%. Fractionated SRS with IDP was needed to improve the TCP. For three- and five-fraction IDP, a maximum predicted TCP of 55 and 68% was achieved respectively (non-coplanar beams and a 1 mm GTV-PTV margin). CONCLUSIONS Using three-fraction or five-fraction IDP the predicted TCP can be increased safely to 55 and 68%, respectively, in large BM with a diameter of 4 cm with a low risk of RN. Using IDP, the therapeutic ratio of SRS in large BM can be increased compared to current SRS dose prescription.
Collapse
|
18
|
Hellerbach A, Luyken K, Hoevels M, Gierich A, Rueß D, Baus WW, Kocher M, Ruge MI, Treuer H. Radiotoxicity in robotic radiosurgery: proposing a new quality index for optimizing the treatment planning of brain metastases. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:136. [PMID: 28818094 PMCID: PMC5561581 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0867-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As irradiated brain volume at 12 Gy (V12) is a predictor for radionecrosis, the purpose of the study was to develop a model for Cyberknife (CK) plans that is able to predict the lowest achievable V12 at a given tumor size and prescription dose (PD), and to suggest a new quality index regarding V12 for optimizing the treatment planning of brain metastases. METHOD In our model V12 was approximated as a spherical shell around the tumor volume. The radial distance between tumor surface and the 12 Gy isodose line was calculated using an approximation of the mean dose gradient in that area. Assuming a radially symmetrical irradiation from the upper half space, the dose distribution is given by the superposition of single fields. The dose profiles of a single field were derived by the measured off-center ratios (OCR) of the CK system. Using the calculated gradients of the sum dose profiles, minimal-V12 was estimated for different tumor sizes. The model calculation was tested using a phantom dataset and retrospectively applied on clinical cases. RESULTS Our model allows the prediction of a best-case scenario for V12 at a given tumor size and PD which was confirmed by the results of the isocentric phantom plans. The results of the non-isocentric phantom plans showed that an optimization of coverage caused an increase in V12. This was in accordance with the results of the retrospective analysis. V12 s of the clinical cases were on average twice that of the predicted model calculation. A good agreement was achieved for plans with an optimal conformity index (nCI). Re-planning of cases with high V12 showed that lower values could be reached by selecting smaller collimators and by allowing a larger number of total MU and more MU per beam. CONCLUSIONS V12 is a main parameter for assessing plan quality in terms of radiotoxicity. The index f12 defined as the ratio of V12 from the actual plan with the evaluated V12 from our model describes the conformity of an optimally possible V12 and thus can be used as a new quality index for optimizing treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Hellerbach
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Klaus Luyken
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mauritius Hoevels
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Gierich
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Daniel Rueß
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Wolfgang W. Baus
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Maximilian I. Ruge
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Harald Treuer
- Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ruschin M, Sahgal A, Soliman H, Myrehaug S, Tsao M, Yeboah C, Sarfehnia A, Chugh B, Kiss A, Lee Y. Investigation of irradiated volume in linac-based brain hypo-fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:117. [PMID: 28709427 PMCID: PMC5513379 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0853-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging techniques such as brain hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (HF-RT) involve complex cases with limited guidelines for plan quality and normal tissue tolerances. The purpose of the present study was to statistically parameterize irradiated volume independently of dose prescription, or margin to determine what spread in achievable irradiated volume one may expect for a given case. Methods We defined EXT as the total tissue within the external contour of the patient (including the target) and we defined BMP as the contour of the brain minus PTV. Irradiated volumes of EXT and BMP at specific doses (i.e. 50, 60%, etc., of the prescribed dose) were extracted from 135 single-target HF-RT clinical cases, each planned with a single-arc, homogeneous (SAHO) approach in which target maximum dose (Dmax) was constrained to <130% of the prescribed dose. Irradiated volumes were subsequently measured for cases involving 2 targets (N = 29), 3 targets (N = 7) and >3 targets (N = 10) to investigate the effect of target number. We also examined the effect of shape complexity. A series of best fit curves with confidence and prediction intervals were generated for irradiated volume versus total target volume and the resulting model was subsequently validated on a subsequent set of 23 consecutive prospective cases not originally used in curve-fitting. A subset of 30 HF-RT cases were re-planned with a well-published four-arc, heterogeneous (FAHE) radiosurgery planning approach (Dmax could exceed 130%) to demonstrate how technique affects irradiated volume. Results For SAHO, strong correlation (R2 > 0.98) was found for predicting irradiated volumes. For a given total target volume, irradiated-volume increased by a range of 1.4–2.9× for >3 versus single-targets depending on isodose level. Shape complexity had minor impact on irradiated volume. There was no statistical difference in irradiated volumes between validation and input data (p > 0.2). The FAHE-generated irradiated volumes yielded curves and prediction and confidence bands that agreed well with published data indicating that the proposed approach is feasible for cross-institutional comparisons. Conclusions A description of irradiated volume for linac-based HF-RT is proposed based on population data. We have demonstrated that the proposed approach is feasible for inter and intra-institutional comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - May Tsao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Collins Yeboah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Arman Sarfehnia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Brige Chugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alex Kiss
- Research Design and Biostatistics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sahgal A, Ruschin M, Ma L, Verbakel W, Larson D, Brown PD. Stereotactic radiosurgery alone for multiple brain metastases? A review of clinical and technical issues. Neuro Oncol 2017; 19:ii2-ii15. [PMID: 28380635 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past three decades several randomized trials have enabled evidence-based practice for patients presenting with limited brain metastases. These trials have focused on the role of surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). As a result, it is clear that local control should be optimized with surgery or SRS in patients with optimal prognostic factors presenting with up to 4 brain metastases. The routine use of adjuvant WBRT remains debatable, as although greater distant brain control rates are observed, there is no impact on survival, and modern outcomes suggest adverse effects from WBRT on patient cognition and quality of life. With dramatic technologic advances in radiation oncology facilitating the adoption of SRS into mainstream practice, the optimal management of patients with multiple brain metastases is now being put forward. Practice is evolving to SRS alone in these patients despite a lack of level 1 evidence to support a clinical departure from WBRT. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of the evidence for patients presenting with limited and multiple metastases, and to present an in-depth analysis of the technology and dosimetric issues specific to the treatment of multiple metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lijun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Wilko Verbakel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
| | - David Larson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed compared to whole brain radiotherapy after surgery of single brain metastasis: Results from a randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 2016; 121:217-224. [PMID: 27793446 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 09/27/2016] [Accepted: 10/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate if neurological/cognitive function outcomes in patients with resected single brain metastasis (BM) after stereotactic radiotherapy of the tumor bed (SRT-TB) are not inferior compared to those achieved with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). METHODS Patients with total/subtotal resection of single BM were randomly assigned either to SRT-TB (n=29) or WBRT (n=30). SRT-TB arm consisted of 15Gy/1 fraction, or 5×5Gy. WBRT consisted of 30Gy/10 fractions. Neurological/cognitive failure was defined as a decrease of neurological score by one point or more, or a worsening of the MiniMental test by at least 3 points, or neurological death. Cumulative incidence of neurological/cognitive failure (CINCF), neurological death (CIND), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS Median follow-up was 29months (range: 8-45) for 15 patients still alive. The difference in the probability of CINCF at 6months (primary endpoint) was -8% in favor of WBRT (95% confidence interval: +17% -35%; non-inferiority margin: -20%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, two-year CIND rates were 66% vs. 31%, for SRT-TB and WBRT arm, respectively, p=.015. The corresponding figures for OS were 10% vs. 37%, p=.046. CONCLUSIONS Non-inferiority of SRT-TB was not demonstrated in our underpowered study. More data from randomized studies are needed for confirmation of the value of this method.
Collapse
|