1
|
Wong SM. Best practice & research clinical haematology: Screening for breast cancer in hodgkin lymphoma survivors. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2023; 36:101525. [PMID: 38092481 DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2023.101525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Childhood and young adult survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma are at an elevated risk of developing breast cancer. Breast cancer risk is felt to originate from chest wall radiation exposure prior to the third decade of life, with incidence beginning to rise approximately eight to ten years following Hodgkin lymphoma treatment. Although incidence varies according to age at radiation exposure, dosage, and treatment fields, cohort studies have documented a cumulative incidence of breast cancer of 10-20% by 40 years of age. Women with a history of chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma are counselled to begin screening with bilateral breast MRI at 25 years of age, or eight years after radiation, whichever occurs later. Outside of high-risk surveillance, the optimal management approach for women with prior radiation exposure continues to evolve. When diagnosed with breast malignancy, evidence supports consideration of unilateral therapeutic and contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, although breast conserving surgery may be considered following multidisciplinary assessment. This review will address the epidemiology, characteristics, screening and management guidelines, and breast-cancer prevention efforts for Hodgkin lymphoma survivors treated with radiation therapy in adolescence and young adulthood.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Wong
- Department of Surgery and Oncology, McGill University Medical School, Montreal, QC, Canada; Jewish General Hospital Stroll Cancer Prevention Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zadravec Zaletel L, Cesen Mazic M, Jazbec J, Kos G, Toplak M, Štrbac D. Excellent results of screening for subsequent breast cancers in long-term survivors of childhood Hodgkin's lymphoma-Results of a population-based study. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1161128. [PMID: 37077334 PMCID: PMC10106574 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1161128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Subsequent breast cancer (SBC) represents a major complication in childhood cancer survivors and screening for SBC in survivors after incidental irradiation of breasts is recommended. In this article, we report the results and discuss benefits of SBC screening in female pts treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in Slovenia in a period of 45 years. Methods Between 1966 and 2010, 117 females were treated for HL under the age of 19 in Slovenia. One hundred five of them survived for 5 years and were included in our study. They were 3-18 (med. 15) years old at diagnosis and followed for 6-52 (med. 28) years. Eighty-three percent of them had chest RT with a median dose of 30 Gy. Ninety-seven (92%) of 105 pts were regularly followed according to the international guidelines including yearly screening mammography/breast MRI in those who received chest RT. Results We diagnosed 10 SBCs in eight pts 14-39 (med. 24) years after diagnosis at the age of 28-52 (med. 42) years. At 40 years of follow-up, cumulative incidence of SBCs in females who got chest RT was 15.2%. Seven of eight patients (with 9 SBCs) got chest RT with 24-80 (med. 36) Gy at the age of 12 to 18 (median 17) years. Two patients in this group got bilateral SBC. One patient got invasive SBC after being treated with ChT containing high-dose of anthracyclines without chest RT at the age of 13. All eight invasive SBCs were invasive ductal cancers, HER2 receptors negative, all but one with positive hormonal receptors. Six invasive cancers were of stage T1N0, one T1N1mi, only one, diagnosed before era of screening, was of T2N1. None of 8 pts died of SBC. Conclusion After introduction of regular breast screening in our female patients, who received chest RT in childhood, all SBCs were of early stage and no patients died of SBC. Survivors of pediatric HL should be informed about the risk of late sequelae of treatment for HL, including SBC. Regular follow-up with breast cancer screening and breast self-examination is of vital importance in those treated with chest RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorna Zadravec Zaletel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Correspondence: Lorna Zadravec Zaletel
| | - Maja Cesen Mazic
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Janez Jazbec
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gregor Kos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Toplak
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Danijela Štrbac
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Radiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphomas has evolved a lot over time, but still plays an important role, almost always in addition to chemotherapy, for the management of the early stages. The major objective is to preserve the quality of life of patients who will be cured from this disease in the vast majority of cases. Also, the personalization of the indications for the purpose of de-escalating toxicity is very refined and is essentially based on the pre- and pertherapeutic assessment by FDG-PET. The indications for radiotherapy are more limited for non-Hodgkin lymphomas, but the same principles are found, regardless of the histological type. We present the update of the recommendations of the French society of oncological radiotherapy for radiotherapy of lymphomas, which remains a very evolving field in terms of therapeutic strategy and evaluation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mulder RL, Hudson MM, Bhatia S, Landier W, Levitt G, Constine LS, Wallace WH, van Leeuwen FE, Ronckers CM, Henderson TO, Moskowitz CS, Friedman DN, Ng AK, Jenkinson HC, Demoor-Goldschmidt C, Skinner R, Kremer LC, Oeffinger KC. Updated Breast Cancer Surveillance Recommendations for Female Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer From the International Guideline Harmonization Group. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:4194-4207. [PMID: 33078972 PMCID: PMC7723685 DOI: 10.1200/jco.20.00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As new evidence is available, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has updated breast cancer surveillance recommendations for female survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer. METHODS We used evidence-based methods to apply new knowledge in refining the international harmonized recommendations developed in 2013. The guideline panel updated the systematic literature review, developed evidence summaries, appraised the evidence, and updated recommendations on the basis of evidence, clinical judgement, and consideration of benefits versus the harms of the surveillance interventions while attaining flexibility in implementation across different health care systems. The GRADE Evidence-to-Decision framework was used to translate evidence to recommendations. A survivor information form was developed to counsel survivors about the potential harms and benefits of surveillance. RESULTS The literature update identified new study findings related to the effects of prescribed moderate-dose chest radiation (10 to 19 Gy), radiation dose-volume, anthracyclines and alkylating agents in non-chest irradiated survivors, and the effects of ovarian function on breast cancer risk. Moreover, new data from prospective investigations were available regarding the performance metrics of mammography and magnetic resonance imaging among survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. Modified recommendations include the performance of mammography and breast magnetic resonance imaging for survivors treated with 10 Gy or greater chest radiation (strong recommendation) and upper abdominal radiation exposing breast tissue at a young age (moderate recommendation) at least annually up to age 60 years. As a result of inconsistent evidence, no recommendation could be formulated for routine breast cancer surveillance for survivors treated with any type of anthracyclines in the absence of chest radiation. CONCLUSION The newly identified evidence prompted significant change to the recommendations formulated in 2013 related to moderate-dose chest radiation and anthracycline exposure as well as breast cancer surveillance modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée L. Mulder
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Melissa M. Hudson
- Departments of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, and Oncology, St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Smita Bhatia
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Wendy Landier
- Institute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Gill Levitt
- Department of Oncology/Haematology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Louis S. Constine
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - W. Hamish Wallace
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Flora E. van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cécile M. Ronckers
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Institute for Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg, Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Tara O. Henderson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Chaya S. Moskowitz
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Danielle N. Friedman
- Departments of Pediatrics and Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Helen C. Jenkinson
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Birmingham Children’s Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Population Health, Cancer and Radiation team, University of Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Hematology/Oncology, CHU Angers, Angers, France
| | - Roderick Skinner
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Haematology/Oncology, Great North Children’s Hospital and Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Leontien C.M. Kremer
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Demoor-Goldschmidt C, de Vathaire F. Review of risk factors of secondary cancers among cancer survivors. Br J Radiol 2018; 92:20180390. [PMID: 30102558 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Improvements in cancer survival have made the long-term risks from treatments more important, in particular among the children, adolescents and young adults who are more at risk particularly due to a longer life expectancy and a higher sensitivity to treatments. Subsequent malignancies in cancer survivors now constitute 15 to 20% of all cancer diagnoses in the cancer registries. Lots of studies are published to determine risk factors, with some controversial findings. Just data from large cohorts with detailed information on individual treatments and verification of what is called "secondary cancers" can add some knowledge, because their main difficulty is that the number of events for most second cancer sites are low, which impact the statistical results. In this review of the literature, we distinguish second and secondary cancers and discuss the factors contributing to this increased risk of secondary cancers. The article concludes with a summary of current surveillance and screening recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt
- CESP University, Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Pediatric Oncology, Hematology, Immunology, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France
| | - Florent de Vathaire
- CESP University, Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.,Cancer and Radiation Team, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|